主要市场及行业指数表现 超预期增强行业轮动策略一月份推荐的行业为房地产、有色金属、国防军工、基础化工和电子行业。策略持仓与上月 结果显著不同，调出非银行金融、传媒和电力设备及新能源，调入房地产、国防军工和基础化工行业。本期推荐行业 中，房地产行业的估值动量、分析师预期和超预期因子得分进一步上升，成为所有行业中排名第一；有色金属的超预 期因子出现改善，目前在所有行业中总分排名第二；国防军工行业的估值动量和分析师预期因子得分均大幅上升；基 础化工则是由于分析师预期和超预期因子得分改善；电子行业此前一直排名第一，但本月超预期得分大幅下降，总排 名落至第五。 景气度估值行业轮动策略给出的一月行业推荐为有色金属、国防军工、机械、基础化工、电子行业，其中机械行业的 分析师预期与超预期得分不高，因此并未得到超预期增强策略的推荐。 调研行业精选策略一月份的推荐行业为计算机、交通运输、煤炭、钢铁和国防军工行业。本期计算机、交通运输和国 防军工行业的基金调研热度有所上升，同时计算机、交通运输、煤炭和国防军工的调研拥挤度有所下降，因此得到推 荐。 国防军工行业得到超预期增强策略和调研精选策略的共同推荐，更加值得关注。 风险提示 以 ...

金融工程 | 证券研究报告 — 周报 2025 年 12 月 26 日 中银量化多策略行业轮动 周报 – 20251225 当前（2025 年 12 月 25 日）中银多策略行业配置系统仓位：非银行金融 （11.8%）、银行（9.3%）、交通运输（9.1%）、食品饮料（7.6%）、基 础化工（7.3%）、钢铁（6.9%）、通信（6.0%）、石油石化（4.7%）、 家电（4.3%）、机械（3.7%）、煤炭（3.7%）、综合金融（3.6%）、有 色金属（3.5%）、建材（3.5%）、综合（3.4%）、农林牧渔（3.4%）、 电 力 设 备 及 新 能 源 （ 3.4% ） 、 电 子 （ 2.5% ） 、 电 力 及 公 用 事 业 （1.2%）、建筑（1.2%）。 相关研究报告 《中银证券量化行业轮动系列（七）：如何把 握市场"未证伪情绪"构建行业动量策略》 20220917 《中银证券量化行业轮动系列（八）："估值泡 沫保护"的高景气行业轮动策略》20221018 《中银证券宏观基本面行业轮动新框架：对传 统自上而下资产配置困境的破局》20230518 《中银证券量化行业轮动系列（九）：长期反 转-中期动量- ...

一、日央行鸽派加息，美联储非鹰派降息，下一任美联储主席人选必须"超级鸽派"。 12 月全球货币政策关键验证期，有望平 稳收官。美国中期选举年，货币 + 财政双宽重 新成为主导资产定价的预期。A 股面临的海外环境可能趋于平稳。 日央行加息 25 基点符合预期，而后续加息的幅度和时机取决于通胀与经济的演变， 日央行鸽派加息，日元兑美元进一步贬 值。套息交易退潮担忧缓解。此前，美联储降息 符合预期，重启扩表早于预期，且表述并不鹰派，叠加特朗普表示下一任美 联储主席人 选必须"超级鸽派"。至此，12 月全球货币政策关键验证期，资本市场大概率能平稳 度过。后续，美国中期选举 年，货币 + 财政双宽的中期预期，可能重新主导资产定价。 增量财政发力的窗口期，可能在美国政府关门问题解决后，2026 年 2 月后才是观察期。 未来一段时间，A 股面临的海外环境可能趋于平稳。 春季主线资产向上有阻力的判断不变，春季行情可能先在非主战场上演绎。11 月 下旬以来，A 股市场面临的宏观环境出现 了"还原"，风格特征也还原了10月底之前 的状态。但向上有阻力的问题并未根本解决。光连接 Alpha 逻辑演绎，但 26 年美股 科 技龙头 ...

Core Viewpoint - The debut of Moer Thread, known as the "first domestic GPU stock," on the STAR Market has set a record for IPO returns in the A-share market, reflecting the strong performance of hard technology stocks in 2023 [1] Group 1: Market Performance - Moer Thread closed at 600.5 yuan per share, with a peak of 688 yuan, resulting in a potential profit of over 280,000 yuan for investors who sold at the highest point [1] - As of December 5, 2023, 101 new stocks listed since 2025 have raised over 110 billion yuan, with a significant focus on high-tech sectors [1] Group 2: Industry Insights - The STAR and ChiNext boards have become the main platforms for hard technology companies, which possess core technology patents and competitive market potential [2] - The distribution of new stocks by industry shows that the power equipment sector leads with 17 new listings (16.8%), followed by electronics (16), automotive (15), machinery (13), and basic chemicals (9) [2] Group 3: Future Trends - The trend for future A-share IPOs is expected to focus on high quality, high technology, and high growth, with a deeper market-oriented pricing mechanism [3] - The STAR and ChiNext boards will increasingly concentrate on technological innovation, while the Beijing Stock Exchange will serve as a primary channel for specialized small and medium enterprises [3]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided in the given content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In 2026, the "fixed - income asset shortage" and "high equity market sentiment" that drove the convertible bond market in 2025 may continue. The convertible bond market is expected to have a return opportunity of over 10% next year [4]. - The supply - demand structure of the convertible bond market will continue to evolve in 2026, with the term structure becoming "dumbbell - shaped", the "aging" of convertible bonds slowing down slightly, the proportion of funds held in convertible bonds remaining high, and the influence of convertible bond ETFs becoming more prominent [4]. - In 2026, the valuation of convertible bonds is likely to remain high. The market risk appetite is not weak, the convertible bond positions of low - risk - preference investors are at a historical low, and the probability of extreme credit risk events in the short term is limited [4]. - In terms of strategy, attention should be paid to "higher - order" undervaluation. The contradiction between the high demand for undervalued convertible bonds from "fixed - income +" investors with a bond - biased approach and the "weak supply" of traditional low - priced convertible bonds needs to be resolved by constructing more complex undervaluation evaluation criteria [4]. - In the context of the "involution" of clause games, more attention should be paid to the odds. In the high - valuation environment, the valuation of convertible bonds is rapidly compressed before the call - back, and the game space for downward revisions has reached a historical low [4]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Convertible Bond "Ecological Niche" Advantage Remains Unchanged, with a Decent Return Space in 2026 - The two factors that drove the convertible bond market in 2025, "fixed - income asset shortage" and "high equity market sentiment", may continue in 2026. As of November 20, 2025, the median parity of the convertible bond market exceeded 100 yuan, and the overall equity nature of convertible bonds was at a historical high. The strong equity market is expected to be the most important support for convertible bonds in 2026 [8]. - The demand for convertible bonds from "fixed - income +" investors, especially bond - biased accounts with stock position limits, is expected to remain high due to the low long - term interest rate environment, which will support the valuation of convertible bonds [8]. - The convertible bond index is expected to have a return space of over 10% in 2026. Based on the delta calculation, if the Shanghai Composite Index reaches 4500 - 5000 points in 2026, the overall return of convertible bonds may be around 8% - 17%, and the actual return space may be higher [8]. 3.2 The "Aging" Speed May Slow Down Slightly, and the Dumbbell Structure Gradually Appears - The contraction speed of the convertible bond market in 2026 is expected to be slightly lower than that in 2025, and the stock size may reach 450 - 500 billion yuan. As of November 21, 2025, the stock size of the convertible bond market was about 550 billion yuan, a decrease of nearly 180 billion yuan from the end of 2024. The net supply of convertible bonds in 2026 may be - 100 billion yuan [13]. - The "aging" of convertible bonds in 2026 may slow down slightly, and the median remaining term of convertible bonds at the end of next year may be about 2.2 years. The main reasons are the redemption of many short - term convertible bonds since 2025 and the recovery of convertible bond supply starting from mid - 2025 [15]. - In 2026, the number of medium - term convertible bonds will significantly decrease, and the term structure will evolve into a "dumbbell - shaped" structure. By the end of 2026, the number of 3 - 4 - year convertible bonds will decline from over 100 at the beginning of the year to about 30. The market may form a structure with medium - and large - sized convertible bonds within 3 years at one end and small - and medium - sized growth technology - related convertible bonds over 4 years at the other end [16]. - In terms of industries, the convertible bonds of non - bank finance, commercial retail, and consumer service industries will all mature by the end of 2026. The non - bank finance industry involves the largest scale and the most targets, with 4 convertible bonds worth 15 billion yuan maturing. The remaining industries' distributions may not change much, and the balance of convertible bonds in the banking, power equipment and new energy, and basic chemical industries significantly leads the others [18]. 3.3 The Proportion of Funds May Further Increase, Pay Attention to Convertible Bond ETFs - As of the end of October 2025, the proportion of convertible bonds held by funds is estimated to reach 47%, the highest level since the data was released. The increase in the proportion of convertible bonds held by public funds is mainly due to the decrease in the scale of convertible bonds held by insurance and annuity funds. By October 2025, the scale of convertible bonds held by insurance may be less than 50 billion yuan, a decrease of nearly 30% from August 2025, and the scale of convertible bonds held by annuities may be close to 130 billion yuan, a record low [20]. - In 2026, the proportion of convertible bonds held by funds is expected to remain high and may even reach a new high. Retail investors have a long - term trend of reducing their holdings of convertible bonds. Insurance and annuity funds may participate in the convertible bond market through FOFs in 2026 due to the low net supply of large - scale and high - rating convertible bonds and the high overall valuation of convertible bonds [22]. - The scale of convertible bond ETFs may continue to expand, and attention should be paid to the potential impact of the high proportion of ETFs on the convertible bond market. As of the end of October 2025, the market value of convertible bonds held by convertible bond ETFs reached 67.84 billion yuan, accounting for nearly 10% of the convertible bond market. The high valuation of newly issued convertible bonds may be related to convertible bond ETFs [27]. 3.4 Valuation is Supported, and There is Room for More Optimism - In 2025, the valuation of convertible bonds increased significantly, and the implied volatility returned to the central level of 2023. As of November 20, 2025, the premium rate per 100 yuan of convertible bonds continued to break through historical highs, and the median implied volatility of convertible bonds exceeded 40% [30]. - In 2026, the valuation of convertible bonds is likely to remain high. The current market risk appetite is not weak, the convertible bond positions of low - risk - preference investors are at a historical low, and the probability of extreme credit risk events in the short term is limited [30]. - The high point of convertible bond valuation may be around 35% - 40%, and considering the possible decline in long - term interest rates and the increase in the bond floor of convertible bonds in 2026, the high point of valuation may be even higher [33]. 3.5 In the High - Valuation Environment, It is Recommended to Focus on "Higher - Order" Undervaluation - In 2025, convertible bond investors clearly preferred undervalued targets. As of November 21, 2025, the return of the low - price strategy was 21.1%, with an excess return of 4.6% compared to the CSI Convertible Bond Index. The relatively "abnormal" excess return may be mainly due to institutional behavior [37]. - In 2026, it may be more difficult for the pure low - price strategy to obtain excess returns. The market is facing the contradiction between the high demand for undervalued convertible bonds from "fixed - income +" investors with a bond - biased approach and the "weak supply" of traditional low - priced convertible bonds. It is recommended to focus on "higher - order" undervaluation [41]. - The convexity strategy may be a good entry point for "higher - order undervaluation". Since 2025, the series of convexity strategies have achieved excellent results, with a Calmar ratio of over 3 and a return of over 20% [42]. 3.6 The "Involution" of Clause Games, and More Attention Should Be Paid to the Odds - In the fourth quarter of 2025, the experience of convertible bond clause games was not good. In the high - level volatile environment of the equity market, listed companies became more cautious in considering convertible bond clauses. As of November 21, 2025, only 1 convertible bond proposed a downward revision in that month, and the ratio of downward - revision announcements to possible downward - revision announcements was 0.04:1, both the lowest levels since March 2023. The ratio of call - back announcements to non - call - back announcements in November was 1.57:1, the highest level in 2025 [45]. - In the high - valuation environment, the convertible bond call - back game has become "involution". The difference in the average conversion premium rate of convertible bonds with a call - back progress of 80% - 100% and those with a progress of 0 - 20% has rapidly expanded since September 2025, and the conversion premium rate of convertible bonds with a high call - back progress has fallen to a historical low [47]. - The game space for convertible bond downward revisions is narrowing. Under the dual influence of high valuation and institutional preference for undervalued convertible bonds, the average difference between the prices of all convertible bonds eligible for downward revision and the expected price after a full downward revision has narrowed to a relatively low level since 2021 [48]. - The report also lists the convertible bonds whose cooling - off periods for downward revisions and call - backs will end in 2026 [52][53][54].

Market Liquidity Overview - R007 increased from 1.4945% to 1.4952%, a rise of 0.07 basis points, while DR007 decreased from 1.4673% to 1.4408%, a drop of 2.65 basis points. The spread between R007 and DR007 widened by 2.72 basis points [9] - The net outflow of funds this week was 40.114 billion yuan, with net inflow decreasing by 23.562 billion yuan compared to last week. Fund supply was 53.787 billion yuan, while demand was 93.901 billion yuan [11] Industry Sector Liquidity Tracking - All sectors in the CITIC first-level industry index experienced declines, with the comprehensive sector showing the most significant drop of 9.47%. The power equipment and new energy, as well as basic chemicals sectors, also saw slight declines [16] - The defense industry received the highest net inflow of leveraged funds at 0.507 billion yuan, while the electronics sector experienced the most significant net outflow of 10.594 billion yuan [18] Style Sector Liquidity Tracking - The style indices generally fell, with the cyclical and growth styles leading the decline at 6.02% and 5.73%, respectively. The growth style was the most active, accounting for 54.58% of the average daily trading volume [33] - The main funds in the style sectors showed a predominant trend of reduction, with the stable style seeing an increase of 0.378 billion yuan, while the growth style saw a reduction of 31.3 billion yuan [32]

Market Performance Review - The A-share market experienced a significant decline this week, with major indices unable to avoid losses. The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 2.72%, while the ChiNext Index saw the largest drop of 6.15%. The small-cap indices, CSI 500 and CSI 1000, also performed poorly, declining by 5.78% and 5.80% respectively [4][12] - All major styles recorded negative returns, with the financial style down by 2.85%, the smallest decline among styles, while the cyclical style dropped by 6.05%, the largest [4][12] - In terms of market capitalization, large-cap stocks outperformed small and mid-cap stocks, maintaining the trend of larger stocks being more resilient during downturns. Core assets represented by the "Mao Index" and "Ning Combination" also saw significant declines, with the Ning Combination down 7.64% and the Mao Index down 3.63% [4][12] Industry Analysis - All primary industries experienced declines, with banking showing relative resilience. The banking sector fell by only 0.89%, while other sectors like power equipment (-10.54%), comprehensive (-9.18%), and basic chemicals (-7.47%) faced larger losses [4][15] - The A-share market's recent downturn aligns with historical patterns of retreat following previous uptrends, particularly affecting sectors like AI, resource products, and new energy, which had previously seen gains [4][15] Future Outlook and Investment Strategy - The report anticipates continued market volatility, with the A-share market expected to remain under pressure due to a dual vacuum period in policy and performance from November to December. The lack of significant movement in household deposits suggests weaker future capital support for the market [5][33] - The investment strategy emphasizes maintaining a growth style, focusing on sectors with strong performance trends and favorable policy expectations. The transition from a fast bull market driven by corporate capital to a slower bull market led by public funds is expected to be challenging [5][33] - Two specific strategies are recommended: investing in photovoltaic equipment that meets the "turnaround + high growth" criteria post-Q3 reports, and targeting commercial sectors and low-altitude economy industries that have lagged since September [5][33]

Group 1 - Market sentiment score has slightly decreased to 3.8 as of November 21, down from 3.9 the previous week, indicating a bearish outlook [7][11] - The consistency between price and volume has weakened significantly, showing a decline in market engagement and a drop in risk appetite, particularly reflected in the decreasing trading volume of the Sci-Tech 50 index [11][18] - The total trading volume for the entire A-share market has decreased by 8.74% week-on-week, with an average daily trading volume of 18650.36 billion yuan [15][17] Group 2 - The banking, textile and apparel, defense, petrochemical, and comprehensive sectors have shown an upward trend in short-term scores, with the petrochemical sector leading at a score of 83.05 [40][41] - The correlation between sector crowding and weekly price changes is negative at -0.24, indicating that sectors with high crowding, such as electric power equipment and basic chemicals, have experienced significant declines [44][46] - The current model indicates a preference for small-cap and value styles, with strong signals for both, although the strength of these signals may need further observation [50][52]

Market Overview - The market is expected to remain volatile next week, with the Wind All A Index staying below the SAR reversal point for a consecutive week, indicating potential downward space [1][2] - The liquidity shock indicator for the CSI 300 Index was 0.15, lower than the previous week (0.67), suggesting current market liquidity is above the average level of the past year by 0.15 standard deviations [2] - The trading activity has decreased, with the five-day average turnover rates for the Shanghai Composite Index and Wind All A Index at 1.21% and 1.86%, respectively, which are at the 73.72% and 80.02% percentile since 2005 [2] Economic Indicators - The US stock market experienced a decline, with the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq indices showing weekly returns of -1.91%, -1.95%, and -2.74%, respectively [2] - The preliminary November PMI for the US manufacturing sector was 51.9, a four-month low, while the services PMI was 55, and the composite PMI was 54.8, both reaching four-month highs [2] Technical Analysis - The Wind All A Index broke below the reversal indicator on November 17, indicating a bearish trend [2] - The moving average strength index score is currently at 80, placing it in the 25.9% percentile for 2023, suggesting a weak market condition [2] - The sentiment model score is at 0 (out of 5), indicating very weak market sentiment, with both trend and weighted models signaling negative [2] Market Performance - For the week of November 17-21, the Shanghai 50 Index fell by 2.72%, the CSI 300 Index by 3.77%, the CSI 500 Index by 5.78%, and the ChiNext Index by 6.15% [3] - The overall market PE (TTM) stands at 21.3 times, which is at the 70.1% percentile since 2005 [3] Factor Analysis - The crowding degree for low valuation factors has decreased, with small-cap factor crowding at 0.39 and low valuation factor crowding at -0.69 [4] - High profitability factor crowding is at -0.02, while high growth factor crowding is at 0.05 [4] Industry Insights - The industry crowding degree is relatively high in sectors such as non-ferrous metals, telecommunications, comprehensive, power equipment, and steel, with significant increases in the crowding degree for basic chemicals and banking [5]

Core Insights - The report highlights the current industry allocation positions, with the highest weights in Non-Bank Financials (10.8%), Transportation (10.1%), and Basic Materials (9.7) [1] - The average weekly return for the CITIC primary industries is 1.0%, with the best-performing sectors being Steel (4.3%), Coal (3.7%), and Electric Equipment & New Energy (3.6%) [3][10] - The report indicates a significant shift in strategy, with increased allocations to TMT, Consumer, Pharmaceutical, and upstream and midstream cyclical sectors, while reducing exposure to Financials and Real Estate [3] Industry Performance Review - The top three performing industries this week are Steel (4.3%), Coal (3.7%), and Electric Equipment & New Energy (3.6%), while the worst performers are Communication (-2.8%), Non-Ferrous Metals (-2.8%), and Electronics (-1.8%) [10][11] - Year-to-date, the industry rotation composite strategy has achieved a cumulative return of 30.0%, outperforming the CITIC primary industry equal-weight benchmark return of 25.6% by 4.4% [3] Valuation Risk Alerts - The report employs a valuation warning system based on the PB ratio over the past six years, identifying industries with PB ratios above the 95th percentile as overvalued. Currently, Retail, Media, Computing, Coal, Oil & Petrochemicals, and the Composite sector are flagged for high valuation risk [12][13] Single Strategy Rankings and Recent Performance - The top three industries based on the high prosperity industry rotation strategy (S1) are Non-Bank Financials, Composite Financials, and Communication [15] - The top three industries based on the implied sentiment momentum strategy (S2) are Electric Equipment & New Energy, Basic Chemicals, and Steel [19] - The macro style rotation strategy (S3) currently favors Banking, Transportation, Oil & Petrochemicals, Construction, Electric Utilities, and Home Appliances [22] Long-Term Reversal Strategy - The long-term reversal strategy (S4) recommends the following industries: Agriculture, Basic Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, National Defense, and Electric Equipment & New Energy [25]