Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund Minsheng Jianyin Dividend Return Mixed Fund (690009) reported a profit of 2.2766 million yuan for Q2 2025, with a net asset value growth rate of 4.33% during the period [3] Fund Performance - As of the end of Q2 2025, the fund's scale was 54.2078 million yuan [15] - The fund's weighted average profit per share for the period was 0.1049 yuan [3] - The fund's unit net value as of July 21 was 2.505 yuan [3] - The fund's one-year cumulative net value growth rate was 6.05%, ranking 732 out of 880 comparable funds [3] - The fund's three-month net value growth rate was 4.02%, ranking 757 out of 880 comparable funds [3] - The fund's six-month net value growth rate was 5.25%, ranking 598 out of 880 comparable funds [3] - The fund's three-year net value growth rate was -23.05%, ranking 672 out of 871 comparable funds [3] Investment Strategy - The fund manager, Deng Kaicheng, maintains a positive outlook on value style and dividends, focusing on stable investments while seeking flexible dividend opportunities [3] - The fund continues to allocate a significant portion to the financial sector and actively seeks companies with improved operations and higher dividend payouts [3] Risk Metrics - The fund's three-year Sharpe ratio was -0.3336, ranking 749 out of 875 comparable funds [8] - The maximum drawdown over the past three years was 33.6%, ranking 513 out of 873 comparable funds [10] - The maximum drawdown in a single quarter occurred in Q1 2021, reaching 18.96% [10] Portfolio Composition - The average stock position over the past three years was 74.32%, compared to the industry average of 80.43% [13] - The fund reached its highest stock position of 77.33% at the end of H1 2024, with a lowest position of 35.27% at the end of Q1 2019 [13] - As of Q2 2025, the fund's top ten holdings included companies such as Chao Hong Ji, Zhong Chong Co., Runben Co., and Meidi Group [17]

2、会议投票表决起止时间：自2025年7月19日起，至2025年8月18日17：00止（以基金管理人收到表决 票时间为准）。 万家基金管理有限公司已于2025年7月18日、2025年7月21日发布了《万家基金管理有限公司关于以通讯 方式召开万家兴恒回报一年持有期混合型证券投资基金基金份额持有人大会的公告》及《万家基金管理 有限公司关于以通讯方式召开万家兴恒回报一年持有期混合型证券投资基金基金份额持有人大会的第一 次提示性公告》。为了使本次基金份额持有人大会顺利召开，现发布关于以通讯方式召开万家兴恒回报 一年持有期混合型证券投资基金基金份额持有人大会的第二次提示性公告。 一、召开会议基本情况 根据《中华人民共和国证券投资基金法》、《公开募集证券投资基金运作管理办法》等法律法规和《万 家兴恒回报一年持有期混合型证券投资基金基金合同》（以下简称"《基金合同》"）的有关规定，万家 兴恒回报一年持有期混合型证券投资基金（以下简称"本基金"）的基金管理人万家基金管理有限公司 （以下简称"基金管理人"或"本基金管理人"）经与本基金的基金托管人兴业银行股份有限公司协商一 致，决定以通讯方式召开本基金的基金份额持有人大会，会议 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Outperform" rating for major state-owned banks, including China Postal Savings Bank, Agricultural Bank of China, and China Bank [3][7][10]. Core Insights - The report emphasizes that state-owned banks exhibit strong asset return rates despite lower ROE, with a RORWA of 1.43%, outperforming joint-stock and regional banks [4][14]. - It highlights the stability of credit demand due to a higher proportion of safe assets, with over 60% of loans in infrastructure and mortgages [5][4]. - The report suggests that the valuation of banks is expected to recover, with a potential upside of 30%-50% from current levels [10]. Summary by Sections Profitability - State-owned banks have a lower leverage ratio, with an average ROE of 11.34% and an average ROA of 0.84%, comparable to the industry average [14]. - The average RORWA for state-owned banks is 1.43%, higher than joint-stock banks (1.16%) and regional banks (1.26%) [4][14]. - The net interest margin is expected to stabilize as deposit rates decrease, benefiting from a high proportion of deposits in liabilities [9][10]. Performance - The net profit growth of state-owned banks is slightly lower than peers due to cautious provisioning [12]. - Non-interest income accounts for 23% of total revenue, which is below the industry average of 25% [12][9]. - The asset composition is heavily weighted towards loans, particularly mortgages, which have lower risk weights [16]. Asset Quality - The report notes that state-owned banks have a stricter risk recognition standard, with a non-performing loan ratio close to the industry average but a higher ratio of overdue loans [5][12]. - The average provision coverage ratio exceeds 250%, indicating potential for profit release [5][12]. Capital Adequacy - State-owned banks maintain a higher core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio, averaging 11.69%, which is significantly above the regulatory minimum [14][16]. - The new capital regulations are expected to further benefit these banks, potentially increasing their capital ratios by about 1 percentage point [9][10]. Valuation - The report anticipates a long-term recovery in bank valuations, with forward P/B ratios expected to stabilize around 0.7-0.8x, compared to the current 0.5x [10]. - Catalysts for this recovery include macroeconomic recovery, lower deposit costs, and supportive fiscal policies [10].

Group 1 - The Shanghai Composite Index opened high and the CSI 300 Commercial Banks Index reported 7780.10 points, with a 3.00% increase over the past month, 11.10% over the past three months, and a 15.30% increase year-to-date [1] - The CSI 300 Index is categorized into 11 primary industries, 35 secondary industries, over 90 tertiary industries, and more than 200 quaternary industries, providing a comprehensive analysis tool for investors [1] - The top ten weights in the CSI 300 Commercial Banks Index are: China Merchants Bank (16.86%), Industrial Bank (12.27%), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (8.23%), Bank of Communications (6.49%), Agricultural Bank of China (6.0%), Jiangsu Bank (5.23%), Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (4.78%), Minsheng Bank (4.08%), Ping An Bank (3.73%), and Shanghai Bank (3.32%) [1] Group 2 - The CSI 300 Commercial Banks Index consists of 76.30% comprehensive banks and 23.70% regional banks [2] - The index sample is adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December [2] - Weight factors are generally fixed until the next scheduled adjustment, with temporary adjustments made in response to changes in the CSI 300 Index samples or significant events affecting sample companies [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report provides an overview of the Tianhong Xinyi 39-Month Regular Open Bond Fund, highlighting its investment strategy, performance metrics, and compliance with regulations [1][2][3]. Fund Overview - Fund Name: Tianhong Xinyi 39-Month Regular Open Bond Fund [3] - Fund Manager: Tianhong Fund Management Co., Ltd. [6] - Fund Trustee: Industrial Bank Co., Ltd. [6] - Total Fund Shares at Reporting Period End: 7,987,245,412.16 shares [3] - Investment Strategy: The fund adopts a strict buy-and-hold strategy, aiming for stable asset appreciation while controlling net value volatility [3]. Performance Metrics - Net Value Growth Rate for the past three months: 0.76% [8] - Net Value Growth Rate for the past six months: 1.41% [8] - Net Value Growth Rate for the past year: 2.91% [8] - Net Value Growth Rate since fund contract inception: 16.38% [8] Investment Composition - Total Value of Bonds Held: 15,015,091,759.87 RMB, accounting for 97.23% of total fund assets [12] - Value of Policy Financial Bonds: 6,821,641,371.69 RMB, representing 80.76% of net asset value [12] Compliance and Fair Trading - The fund operates in accordance with national laws and regulations, ensuring no violations of fund contract commitments [9] - Fair trading procedures are effectively implemented, with no reported incidents of unfair trading or profit transfer [10]

Core Insights - The report indicates a shift in the banking sector's focus from fundamental expectations and growth thinking to strategy and trading thinking, highlighting the evolving landscape of investment approaches in the industry [2][29]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Three significant regulatory actions have guided the banking industry from "wild growth" to orderly expansion: 1. In 2011, the tightening of city commercial banks' cross-regional expansion and the central bank's credit scale control ended the disorderly expansion of the banking sector [16][20]. 2. The introduction of the MPA assessment in 2016 served as a core regulatory framework, preventing small and medium-sized banks from circumventing regulations and promoting stability [21][23]. 3. The implementation of asset management regulations in 2018 significantly constrained the expansion of non-standard assets in banks, addressing risks associated with shadow banking [24][28]. Group 2: Valuation Framework - A new understanding of the valuation framework for banks is presented, emphasizing the "PB-ROE" model, where banks with higher ROE typically correspond to higher PB ratios. The introduction of dividend yield and payout ratio into this framework suggests that banks with an ROE above 11.7% could justify a PB valuation above 1 [32][33]. - The report notes a shift in the driving logic behind bank stock price increases from growth logic to dividend strategies, indicating a transition in market focus from numerator-driven factors (like ROE) to denominator-driven factors (like dividend yield) [32][33]. Group 3: Historical Performance Review - A comprehensive review of bank stocks from 2008 to 2022 reveals that the banking sector has outperformed the CSI 300 index, achieving nine rounds of excess returns lasting over three months. The core driving factors shifted from growth to dividends over this period [8][29]. - Specific periods of excess returns are highlighted, such as: 1. From November 2008 to July 2009, the sector achieved an absolute return of 139.8% and an excess return of 15.3% [19]. 2. In 2011, despite negative absolute returns, the sector still managed an excess return of 17.6% [19]. 3. The period from October 2014 to December 2014 saw an absolute return of 60% and an excess return of 14.9% [19]. Group 4: Investment Recommendations - The report suggests two main investment themes: 1. Anticipating a reduction in insurance preset interest rates in Q3 2025, it recommends focusing on high-dividend banks such as China Construction Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank [3]. 2. The strong performance of small and medium-sized banks since the beginning of the year is expected to continue, with recommendations for banks like Industrial Bank, CITIC Bank, and Nanjing Bank based on valuation, dividends, and fundamentals [3].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for both the banking and securities sectors [10]. Core Views - Investment opportunities are prioritized in the order of banking > securities > insurance, driven by strong performance in the banking sector and robust earnings forecasts from securities firms [2][13]. - The central bank's data indicates a significant increase in social financing and deposits, with corporate short-term loans showing strong growth [3][15]. - Major securities firms are expected to report impressive earnings, with large firms seeing a net profit growth of 50% to 80% year-on-year, while smaller firms may achieve growth rates of 50% to 120% [2][32]. Summary by Sections Banking Sector - The central bank's report on social financing shows a year-on-year increase, primarily due to government bond issuance and a surge in corporate short-term loans [3][15]. - Hangzhou Bank reported a revenue increase of 3.89% year-on-year for the first half of 2025, with net profit rising by 16.67% [17]. - Postal Savings Bank has established a financial asset investment company, marking the completion of the AIC strategy by the six major banks [18][19]. - Recommended investment themes include high-quality regional banks, actively underweighted stocks, and large banks with strong dividend advantages [3][14]. Securities Sector - The report highlights a strong performance in the securities sector, with major firms expected to report significant profit growth [2][32]. - The trading environment remains robust, with financing balances nearing 1.9 trillion yuan, indicating active leverage in the market [2][32]. - Key firms recommended for investment include Galaxy Securities, Guotai Junan, CITIC Securities, and Zhongjin Company [4][32]. Insurance Sector - The insurance sector is experiencing a gradual increase in valuations, although profit margins are tightening [3][37]. - Investors are advised to focus on high-quality leading companies within the insurance sector [4][37].

Core Viewpoint - The bond underwriting market in China is experiencing severe price competition, with underwriters willing to accept extremely low fees to secure business, leading to regulatory investigations into several institutions for abnormal pricing practices [1][6][10]. Group 1: Underwriting Fee Trends - The underwriting fees for the 2025-2026 secondary capital bond project by Guangfa Bank were reported as exceptionally low, with fees as low as 700 yuan and an average of around 10,000 yuan per institution, significantly below market averages [3][4][6]. - The total underwriting service fee for the six selected institutions was only 63,448 yuan, raising concerns about the sustainability of such low pricing [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The China Interbank Market Dealers Association has initiated self-regulatory investigations into six institutions for their unusually low bids, citing potential violations of self-regulatory rules [6][10]. - Previous instances of low underwriting fees by Guangfa Bank have also drawn market scrutiny, indicating a pattern of aggressive pricing strategies that may undermine market integrity [6][10]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The intense competition among underwriting firms is driven by a desire to increase market share and rankings, leading to a cycle of low pricing that may not cover operational costs [7][9]. - The top six banks dominate the bond underwriting market, holding a combined market share of 53.7%, which pressures smaller firms to engage in price competition to secure business [9]. Group 4: Industry Concerns - There are significant concerns that continued low pricing in the underwriting market could lead to inadequate due diligence and increased risks of bond defaults, potentially harming the overall market [10]. - Experts suggest that a shift in focus from low pricing to value creation is necessary to restore a healthy competitive environment in the bond underwriting sector [10].

Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund, CITIC Prudential Dividend Select A (008091), reported a profit of 329,100 yuan for Q2 2025, with a weighted average profit per fund share of 0.0235 yuan. The fund's net value growth rate was 1.57%, and its total scale reached 22.47 million yuan by the end of Q2 2025 [3][16]. Fund Performance - As of July 17, the fund's unit net value was 1.633 yuan. Over the past year, the fund achieved a cumulative net value growth rate of 10.38%, ranking it highest among its peers, while CITIC Prudential New Blue Chip had the lowest at -0.2% [3]. - The fund's net value growth rates over different periods are as follows: 4.51% over the last three months (ranked 543/615), 4.91% over the last six months (ranked 480/615), and 14.74% over the last three years (ranked 29/324) [4]. Investment Strategy - In Q2 2025, the fund adjusted its holdings towards high-dividend stocks, slightly increasing the concentration of its portfolio. The external environment has become more complex, with increasing trade barriers, but the overall economic operation in China remains stable and improving [3]. Risk and Return Metrics - The fund's Sharpe ratio over the past three years is 0.4308, ranking 17/319 among comparable funds. The maximum drawdown over the same period was 14.64%, with the largest single-quarter drawdown occurring in Q1 2022 at 14.53% [10][12]. Portfolio Composition - The average stock position of the fund over the past three years was 88.66%, compared to the industry average of 83.13%. The fund reached a peak stock position of 92.3% in mid-2021 and a low of 70.57% in Q1 2020 [15]. - As of Q2 2025, the top ten holdings of the fund included Midea Group, Yangtze Power, Bank of Communications, Hangzhou Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Jiangsu Bank, China Merchants Bank, Gree Electric Appliances, Daqin Railway, and Industrial Bank [19].

Core Viewpoint - The AI Fund Yin Hua Mixed Reform Dividend Flexible Allocation Mixed Initiation A (005519) reported a profit of 1.5649 million yuan in Q2 2025, with a net value growth rate of 5.01% for the period [3]. Fund Performance - As of the end of Q2 2025, the fund's scale was 32.6497 million yuan [14]. - The fund's unit net value as of July 17 was 1.197 yuan [3]. - The fund's performance over different time frames includes: - 3-month net value growth rate: 6.99%, ranking 582 out of 880 comparable funds [3]. - 6-month net value growth rate: 8.91%, ranking 380 out of 880 comparable funds [3]. - 1-year net value growth rate: 2.26%, ranking 790 out of 880 comparable funds [3]. - 3-year net value growth rate: -26.93%, ranking 726 out of 870 comparable funds [3]. Risk Metrics - The fund's Sharpe ratio over the past three years was -0.5078, ranking 824 out of 874 comparable funds [7]. - The maximum drawdown over the past three years was 38.97%, ranking 360 out of 864 comparable funds [10]. - The highest quarterly maximum drawdown occurred in Q1 2024, at 17.45% [10]. Investment Strategy - The fund adheres to a low-volatility dividend stock selection strategy, which has outperformed its benchmark in the first half of the year [3]. - The average stock position over the past three years was 83.36%, compared to the industry average of 80.33% [13]. - The fund reached its highest stock position of 93.73% at the end of H1 2023, while the lowest was 24.17% at the end of H1 2019 [13]. Top Holdings - As of the end of Q2 2025, the fund's top ten holdings included major banks and financial institutions such as Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Merchants Bank, and Ping An Insurance [17].