关于延长国信证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者 公开发行公司债券（第六期）簿记建档时间的公告 国信证券股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"发行人"）向专业投资者公开 发行面值总额不超过 200 亿元公司债券已获得中国证券监督管理委员会证监许 可[2024]1722 号文注册同意。 根据《国信证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券（第 六期）发行公告》，发行人及簿记管理人原定于 2025 年 9 月 15 日（T-1 日）15:00 到 18:00 以簿记建档的方式向网下投资者进行利率询价，并根据簿记建档结果确 定本期债券的最终票面利率。 因簿记建档当日市场变化较为剧烈，经全体簿记参与人协商一致，现将本期 债券簿记建档结束时间由 2025 年 9 月 15 日 18:00 延长至 2025 年 9 月 15 日 19:00。 特此公告。 （以下无正文） 1 ( 本页无正文，为《关于延长国信证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公 开发行公司债券（第六期）簿记建档时间的公告》之盖章页） 司 日 2 (本页无正文,为《关于延长国信证券股份有限公司 2025 年面向专业投资者公 开 ...

Core Viewpoint - Guosen Securities initiates coverage on CITIC Financial Assets (02799) with a "Neutral" rating, projecting net profit for ordinary shareholders to reach 10.4 billion, 10.9 billion, and 11.0 billion yuan for 2025-2027, representing year-on-year growth of 8.5%, 4.1%, and 1.1% respectively, with corresponding EPS of 0.13, 0.14, and 0.14 yuan, and PE ratios of 7.6, 7.3, and 7.3 times, while PB ratios are 1.70, 1.38, and 1.16 times, suggesting a reasonable stock price range of 1.16-1.28 HKD [1] Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, CITIC Financial Assets achieved operating revenue (including performance from joint ventures and associates) of 40.2 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 19.9%, and net profit from continuing operations of 5.5 billion yuan, up 19.7%, with net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders reaching 6.2 billion yuan, a growth of 15.7%, resulting in an annualized ROE of 21.1% and ROA of 1.1% [1] Asset Scale - As of the end of Q2 2025, the total assets of the company amounted to 1.01 trillion yuan, reflecting a 2.7% increase from the beginning of the year but a 4.2% decrease year-on-year. The non-performing asset management segment's total assets grew by 2.7% from the start of the year, while the asset management and investment segment's total assets increased by 1.6% [2] Segment Performance - The non-performing asset management segment reported a revenue increase of 58.3% year-on-year, primarily due to approximately 21.3 billion yuan in income from investments in China Bank and Everbright Bank. Conversely, the asset management and investment segment saw a significant revenue decline of 85.1%, with its share of revenue before group offsets dropping to 5.6% [3] Credit Costs and Risk Management - The credit cost rate for the first half of the year was 15.3%, a substantial year-on-year increase, attributed to higher credit impairments on debt instruments measured at amortized cost. The significant provisioning has enhanced the company's risk resilience, with a coverage ratio of 270% for debt instruments measured at amortized cost and those measured at fair value, an increase of 44 percentage points from the beginning of the year [4]

Core Viewpoint - Guosen Securities initiates coverage on CITIC Financial Assets (02799) with a "Neutral" rating, projecting net profit for ordinary shareholders to reach 10.4 billion, 10.9 billion, and 11.0 billion yuan from 2025 to 2027, representing year-on-year growth of 8.5%, 4.1%, and 1.1% respectively, with corresponding EPS of 0.13, 0.14, and 0.14 yuan, and PE ratios of 7.6, 7.3, and 7.3 times, while PB ratios are 1.70, 1.38, and 1.16 times, suggesting a reasonable stock price range of 1.16-1.28 HKD [1] Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, CITIC Financial Assets achieved operating revenue (including performance from joint ventures and associates) of 40.2 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 19.9%, and net profit from continuing operations of 5.5 billion yuan, up 19.7%, with net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders reaching 6.2 billion yuan, reflecting a 15.7% increase, while annualized ROE stood at 21.1% and ROA at 1.1% [1] Asset Growth - As of the end of Q2 2025, the total assets of the company amounted to 1.01 trillion yuan, marking a 2.7% increase from the beginning of the year but a 4.2% decrease year-on-year. The total assets in the non-performing asset management segment grew by 2.7% compared to the beginning of the year, while the asset management and investment segment saw a 1.6% increase [2] Segment Performance - The non-performing asset management segment reported a revenue increase of 58.3% year-on-year, primarily due to approximately 21.3 billion yuan in income from investments in China Bank and Everbright Bank. Conversely, the asset management and investment segment experienced an 85.1% decline in revenue, with its share of income before group offsets dropping to 5.6% [3] Credit Cost and Risk Management - The credit cost rate for the first half of the year was 15.3%, significantly up year-on-year, attributed to increased credit impairment on debt instruments measured at amortized cost. The substantial provisioning has enhanced the company's risk resilience, with the overall provision coverage ratio for debt instruments measured at amortized cost and those measured at fair value, with changes recorded in other comprehensive income, reaching 270% by the end of June 2025, an increase of 44 percentage points from the beginning of the year [4]

Core Viewpoint - Hong Kong jewelry companies are showing strong resilience and are gradually returning to a growth trajectory through multi-dimensional transformation, leveraging their strong brand power, which is driving continuous valuation recovery [1] Group 1: Market Performance - The performance of Hong Kong jewelry companies has rebounded significantly, with notable stock price increases for Chow Tai Fook, Luk Fook, and Chow Sang Sang, achieving respective gains of 151%, 95%, and 135% as of September 10, 2025 [1] - The recovery is attributed not only to market trends but also to fundamental improvements within the companies, such as Luk Fook's same-store sales growth of 19% and Chow Sang Sang's net profit growth of 76% year-on-year for the first half of 2025 [1] Group 2: Industry Changes - The underlying logic of jewelry consumption has evolved to emphasize both "fashion and value preservation," with rising gold prices enhancing the perception of gold as a store of value [2] - The rapid increase in gold prices has suppressed some traditional demand, while breakthroughs in design have elevated the fashion appeal of gold jewelry, leading to over 100% growth in fixed-price gold jewelry sales for several companies in 2024 [2] - Fixed-price products with premium design have achieved gross margins of 30%-40%, ensuring profitability for companies [2] Group 3: Company Transformations - Hong Kong jewelry companies are enhancing product design and differentiation, with Chow Tai Fook's contribution from fixed-price gold products increasing from 7.1% to 19.2% in mainland China for the fiscal year 2025 [3] - Store transformations are being optimized to focus on high-quality locations and service experiences, improving single-store output and mitigating short-term store contraction pressures [3] - Companies are leveraging brand power through social media marketing, IP collaborations, and celebrity endorsements to attract younger consumers, with over 80% of followers on Xiaohongshu being aged 18-34 [3]

智通财经APP获悉，国信证券发布研报称，整体来看，港资珠宝企业在近年来的行业变化中虽有短期挣 扎，但也展现了自身较强应变能力，通过从产品到渠道的多维度转型变革，依托自身强品牌力基础，正 逐步重回增长轨道，并带动估值持续修复。重点推荐周大福(01929)、六福集团(00590)、周生生 (00116)。 近年来，金价持续上涨，以及消费者对钻石镶嵌等高溢价品类的祛魅，黄金的保值属性认知持续强化。 但过快抬升的金价也压制了部分传统需求的释放，且成本加成定价的克重黄金产品也面临毛利压力;与 此同时，设计工艺的突破让黄金的时尚属性显著提升，悦己消费需求场景得以打开，具备强产品设计的 一口价黄金首饰实现"时尚+保值"的完美融合，多家企业24年一口价黄金饰品增长幅度达到100%以上。 同时具备产品溢价的一口价产品毛利率达到30%-40%，确保了企业盈利水平。 港资珠宝企业自身变革：产品力+渠道力+品牌力的三重升级 1)加大产品设计及差异化布局，近年定价黄金饰品的营收贡献持续增长，如2025财年周大福中国内地黄 金饰品中，定价模式产品贡献值从7.1%提升至19.2%;六福集团定价黄金产品同店实现高双位数增长。2) 门店变革优 ...

Core Viewpoint - The bond issuance by securities firms in August reached nearly 300 billion yuan, marking a record high for the year, driven by strong demand for capital replenishment due to active market trading, low interest costs, and policy encouragement [1][2]. Group 1: Bond Issuance Data - In August, securities firms issued a total of 141 bonds, raising 293.5 billion yuan, both figures being the highest monthly totals for the year [2][3]. - As of September 12, the total bond issuance by securities firms for the year reached 1.06 trillion yuan, a significant increase from 673.6 billion yuan in the same period last year [2]. Group 2: Major Issuers - Six securities firms issued bonds exceeding 50 billion yuan this year, with China Galaxy Securities leading at 102.5 billion yuan, followed by Huatai Securities at 77.7 billion yuan [3]. Group 3: Business Development and Demand - The surge in financing demand from July to August coincided with a notable rise in the A-share market, with the Shanghai Composite Index breaking through several key levels [4]. - The primary uses of the raised funds include refinancing existing debts and supplementing working capital to support business expansion [4]. Group 4: Margin Financing and Competitive Landscape - The balance of margin financing reached 2.34 trillion yuan by September 11, indicating a growing demand for leveraged funds among high-net-worth clients [6]. - The average bond issuance interest rate for securities firms this year was 1.89%, with larger firms enjoying lower rates, enhancing their competitive edge in margin financing [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - Guosen Securities has successfully acquired Wanhe Securities, with the newly issued shares listed on September 10, 2025, marking a significant expansion for the company in the securities industry [1][2]. Acquisition Details - Guosen Securities completed the acquisition of 96.08% of Wanhe Securities from seven institutions for a total transaction value of 5.192 billion yuan, issuing 629 million shares at a price of 8.25 yuan per share [2][3]. - The acquisition process involved multiple regulatory approvals, including from the Shenzhen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission and the China Securities Regulatory Commission [2][3]. Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, Guosen Securities reported operating revenue of 11.075 billion yuan and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 5.367 billion yuan, representing year-on-year growth of 51.84% and 71%, respectively [4][5]. - The company's net profit has shown continuous growth over four consecutive quarters, with significant increases in the second quarter of 2024 and the first half of 2025 [5][6]. Business Segments - The growth in Guosen Securities' revenue is primarily driven by investment income and brokerage services, with investment income accounting for 40.93% of total revenue in 2024 [5][6]. - In the first half of 2025, investment income reached 5.066 billion yuan, up 78.99% year-on-year, while brokerage service income also saw substantial growth [6]. Industry Context - The securities industry has witnessed a surge in mergers and acquisitions, with six completed transactions in the past year, indicating a trend towards consolidation [3]. - The overall bond issuance by securities firms has increased significantly, with a year-on-year growth of 66.18% as of September 11, 2025, driven by the need for business expansion and capital optimization [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent surge in bond issuance by securities firms is driven by a combination of active market trading, low interest costs, policy encouragement, and the need for debt structure adjustment and business expansion [1][4]. Group 1: Bond Issuance Trends - In August, securities firms issued a record 141 bonds, raising a total of 2,935 billion yuan, marking the highest monthly figures of the year [2][3]. - As of September 12, the total bond issuance by securities firms for the year reached 1.06 trillion yuan, a significant increase from 673.63 billion yuan in the same period last year [2][3]. - Six securities firms have issued over 500 billion yuan in bonds this year, with China Galaxy Securities leading at 1,025 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Business Development and Financing Needs - The financing demand from securities firms surged significantly from July to August, coinciding with a notable rise in the A-share market, where the Shanghai Composite Index broke through several key points [4]. - The primary uses of the raised funds include refinancing existing debts and supplementing working capital to support business expansion [4]. - The shift in the securities industry towards capital-driven growth necessitates increased capital scale, which can be achieved through bond issuance [4]. Group 3: Margin Financing and Competitive Landscape - The balance of margin financing reached 2.34 trillion yuan by September 11, indicating a growing demand for leveraged funds among high-net-worth clients [7]. - The average bond issuance interest rate for securities firms this year is 1.89%, with larger firms enjoying lower rates around 1.85% [7][8]. - Some leading firms are offering competitive margin financing rates as low as 2.8% for high-net-worth clients, while smaller firms face pressure due to higher financing costs [8].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - The "History of Overseas Central Bank Bond Purchases" series systematically analyzes key stages of bond - purchase policies of the Bank of Japan, the Federal Reserve, and the European Central Bank. Their policies have similarities and differences in approach, implementation timing, and scale [1]. - The Bank of Japan and the Federal Reserve's bond - purchase policies evolved from traditional to innovative tools. The Bank of Japan was a pioneer in unconventional monetary policies, starting quantitative easing in 2001. The Federal Reserve launched quantitative easing in 2008. The ECB was more cautious about unconventional policies and started full - scale quantitative easing in 2015 [1]. - The bond - purchase policies of the Federal Reserve, ECB, and the Bank of Japan have been complex. The Federal Reserve ended QE in 2014, then had a slow balance - sheet reduction (QT), which was halted early in 2019. It restarted QE in 2022 due to the pandemic and then QT due to high inflation. The ECB stopped APP net purchases in 2018, restarted in 2019, and ended bond - buying in 2022 and started passive QT in 2023. The Bank of Japan ended negative interest rates and started balance - sheet reduction in March 2024. The Bank of Japan's exit was more cautious and delayed, the Federal Reserve's policy cycle was more flexible, and the ECB's policy shift was more sluggish [2]. - The bond - purchase scales of the three central banks are huge. As of August 20, 2025, the Bank of Japan's scale was 574.8 trillion yen, the Federal Reserve's was $6.5 trillion, and the ECB's was 4.2 trillion euros, accounting for 79.5%, 98.6%, and 69.2% of their total assets respectively. Relative to economic aggregates, the Bank of Japan's balance - sheet expansion was more significant [3]. - The Federal Reserve and the ECB have a wider range of bond - purchase categories. The Federal Reserve mainly buys MBS and Treasury bonds. The ECB's bond - purchase scope includes government bonds, covered bonds, asset - backed securities, and corporate bonds. The Bank of Japan, besides buying Treasury bonds, also buys a large amount of stock ETFs and J - REITs [3]. - The Bank of Japan's YCC policy directly sets an interest - rate ceiling, marking a new stage in monetary policy by shifting from controlling bond - purchase quantity to controlling bond interest rates [3]. Summary by Relevant Catalog First Stage (2009 - 2010): First Attempt during the Sub - prime Crisis - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Provide liquidity to the bond market. After the 2008 financial crisis, the euro - area banking system faced a liquidity crisis, especially in the covered - bond market [14][15]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Continuously make small - scale purchases in the primary and secondary markets. In May 2009, the ECB announced the CBPP, buying 600 billion euros of covered bonds from July 2009 to June 30, 2010, with a maximum holding of 611.4 billion euros [16]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The CBPP had a certain boosting effect on the covered - bond market, reducing the yield and spread of bank - issued covered bonds and enhancing bank financing ability. However, due to its limited scale, its impact on the overall bond market and economy was relatively mild [17]. Second Stage (2010 - 2012): Emergency Response during the European Debt Crisis - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Provide liquidity to the bond market. After the Greek debt crisis, market panic spread to peripheral countries, causing a sell - off of their sovereign bonds and a surge in yields. The ECB launched the "Securities Markets Programme" (SMP) to address market liquidity and financing difficulties [22]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Buy sovereign bonds of troubled countries in the secondary market. The SMP aimed to buy public and private - sector bonds in the secondary market without disclosing the quantity, time frame, or target level. It initially focused on Greece, Ireland, and Portugal, then expanded to Italy and Spain. The ECB also sterilized the injected liquidity. In 2011, SMP was restarted and expanded. The SMP's total reached a maximum of 2,195 billion euros by March 5, 2012. In 2011, the ECB launched CBPP2 with a planned scale of 400 billion euros but only bought 164 billion euros. In 2012, the "Outright Monetary Transactions" (OMT) plan was introduced but never activated [23][24]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The SMP had an immediate positive impact on the bond market, reducing the yields of Spanish and Italian bonds. The OMT had an "announcement effect", significantly reducing the yields of Spanish and Italian bonds. However, as the economic recovery was weak, the effectiveness of the SMP decreased [25]. Third Stage (2013 - 2018): Full - scale Quantitative Easing under Persistent Low Inflation - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Implement QE in the euro area. After the European debt crisis, the euro - area economy recovered slowly, with low inflation and high financing costs. The ECB introduced negative interest rates and launched multiple bond - purchase programs [31]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Use a combination of measures. In 2014, the ECB announced CBPP3 and the Asset - Backed Securities Purchase Program (ABSPP). CBPP3 bought covered bonds, with a holding of 2,702 billion euros by the end of 2018. ABSPP bought asset - backed securities, with a holding of 276 billion euros by the end of 2018. In 2015, the Expanded Asset Purchase Programme (APP) was launched, including the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) and the Corporate Sector Purchase Programme (CSPP). The APP ended net purchases in December 2018, with a cumulative net purchase of about 2.65 trillion euros [32][33][35]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The ECB's large - scale bond purchases led to a significant decline in long - term government bond yields in the euro area. The yields of German 10 - year government bonds fell into negative territory in 2016, and the yields of French bonds also dropped close to zero. The spread between peripheral and core countries generally narrowed [39]. Fourth Stage (2019 - 2023): Emergency Bond - purchase Plan during the Pandemic - **Macro Background and Bond - purchase Policy Goals**: Intervene promptly to maintain financial stability. In 2019, due to economic slowdown and low inflation, the ECB restarted QE. In 2020, the "Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme" (PEPP) was launched to deal with the impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic [42]. - **Bond - purchase Method**: Systematically increase purchases. In September 2019, the ECB restarted QE with a monthly purchase of 200 billion euros. In March 2020, an additional 1,200 billion euros of purchases were announced. The PEPP was launched in March 2020 with an initial scale of 7,500 billion euros, which was later expanded to 1.85 trillion euros. The PEPP ended net purchases in March 2022, with a cumulative purchase of about 1.71 trillion euros [43][45]. - **Bond - market Impact Analysis**: The PEPP effectively alleviated market panic, stabilized investor confidence, and reduced excessive market volatility. During the implementation and scale - expansion of the PEPP, the 10 - year bond yields in Europe generally declined. When the purchase speed slowed down, bond yields generally rose [52]. Summary and Insights from Overseas Central Bank Bond Purchases - Similarities and differences exist among the bond - purchase policies of the Bank of Japan, the Federal Reserve, and the ECB in terms of approach, implementation timing, and scale, as detailed in the core viewpoints above [53].

Core Insights - The 42 listed securities firms reported a total operating revenue of 251.9 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 31%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 104 billion yuan, up 65% [1] - Guotai Junan surpassed CITIC Securities in net capital, reaching 194.1 billion yuan, marking an increase of 102.4 billion yuan, or 111.64% [1][8] - Guoxin Securities experienced the largest decrease in net capital, dropping by 13.4 billion yuan to 71.5 billion yuan, a decline of 15.8% [3][6] Revenue and Profit Performance - Guoxin Securities achieved a revenue of 11.1 billion yuan, a year-on-year growth of 51.84%, and a net profit of 5.4 billion yuan, up 71% [1][2] - The total net capital of the 42 listed securities firms increased by 168.4 billion yuan to 1547.6 billion yuan, reflecting a growth rate of 10.88% [5] Capital Structure and Implications - Net capital is a critical indicator of a securities firm's capital adequacy and liquidity, with a decrease potentially limiting business expansion and risk tolerance [6][7] - Guoxin Securities' significant drop in net capital may hinder its ability to engage in capital-intensive business activities [6][7] Competitive Landscape - Guotai Junan's rise in net capital positions it as a potential leader in the industry, challenging CITIC Securities' previous dominance [8] - Despite Guotai Junan's higher net profit, its underlying performance may be influenced by non-recurring gains, raising questions about its sustainable growth compared to CITIC Securities [8]