Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided Core Viewpoints of the Report - The current market is approaching the phased bottom range, which is a good time to layout the key market window in the first half of next year, especially before the Spring Festival [8]. - In the first half of next year, the most important market will still be before the Spring Festival, and sectors such as securities and technology may experience structural out - performance [8]. - There are significant expected differences among the consumer, non - banking financial, and technology sectors [6]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Market Review - **Market Performance** - Most of the major market indices rose last week, with the Shanghai Composite 50 Index having the largest increase of 0.32% [9][15]. - In terms of major industry performance, the daily consumption index and financial index performed relatively well, with weekly changes of 2.26% and 2.06% respectively; the information technology index and industrial index performed weakly, with changes of - 2.08% and - 1.22% respectively [9][15]. - Among the 30 Shenwan primary industries, 19 industries rose. The industries with relatively large increases were commercial retail, non - banking finance, and beauty care, rising 6.66%, 2.90%, and 2.87% respectively; the industries with relatively large declines were electronics, power equipment, and machinery, falling 3.28%, 3.12%, and 1.56% respectively [9][18]. - **Trading Heat** - The average daily trading volume of Wind All - A last week was 1.760484 trillion yuan (the previous value was 1.953044 trillion yuan), which was at a relatively high level in history (82.30% in the three - year historical quantile) [9][21]. - **Valuation Tracking** - As of December 19, 2025, the valuation (PE_TTM) of Wind All - A was 21.79, an increase of 0.06 from the previous week, and it was at the 89.40% quantile in the past five - year history [26]. - Among the 30 Shenwan primary industries, 19 industries' valuations (PE_TTM) were repaired [26]. Market Observation: Expected Differences in the Year - End Market - **Last Week's Market Conditions** - The market fluctuated and declined last week, with shrinking trading volume and enhanced profit - making effects. The Wind All - A and CSI 300 Index fell 0.15% and 0.28% respectively, while the CSI 2000 Index rose 0.30%. The average daily trading volume of Wind All - A was about 1.76 trillion yuan, a decrease of 9.86% from the previous week. The proportion of rising stocks in Wind All - A increased significantly, and on Friday, the number of rising stocks in the Chinese mainland exceeded 4400 [6]. - The market generally showed the characteristics of "relatively stable indices and changing structural trends". The fluctuations of broad - based indices were generally limited, and the market's risk expectations were temporarily stable. In terms of style, value outperformed growth as a whole. The large - cap value index had a relatively large increase (1.52%), while the large - cap growth index had a relatively large correction (- 1.39%). In terms of industries, the technology sector, which had a large increase since the beginning of this month, had an obvious correction, while the consumer and financial sectors performed strongly [6]. - **Expected Differences among Sectors** - **Consumer Sector**: Recently, relevant policies have been intensively issued, raising positive expectations, but the substantial boost to the sector's profitability still needs to be verified by the implementation of subsequent fiscal and credit tools. It is currently more of a thematic and expected - repair market [6]. - **Non - Banking Financial Sector**: The market rose last week, but the valuation level was still low, indicating that potential positive factors were not fully priced. If the return of funds at the beginning of next year resonates with the improvement of risk appetite, the sector has the potential to achieve resonance between valuation repair and profit improvement [6]. - **Technology Sector**: In the short term, it is greatly affected by negative overseas policy impacts, but the capital preference is strong. With the return of loose capital, it still has support [6]. - **Outlook for Next Year** - In the first half of next year, the most important market will still be before the Spring Festival. Sectors such as securities and technology may experience structural out - performance due to factors such as the nomination of the new Fed Chairman, the return of institutional funds at the beginning of the year, and some micro - events [8]. Investment Recommendations - It is recommended to layout for the key market window in the first half of next year, especially before the Spring Festival. Sectors such as robotics, nuclear power, and commercial aerospace in the technology sector, as well as the non - banking financial sector, are expected to be the main lines of the Spring market. The consumer sector mainly presents phased and thematic trading opportunities, and attention can be paid to service - type consumption such as sports and cultural tourism, as well as sub - sectors such as medical devices that benefit from the aging trend [8]. Economic Calendar - The report mentions paying attention to global economic data, but specific data in the economic calendar are not detailed in the provided content [28].

杠杆上行，大行保险买长 ——流动性与机构行为跟踪 Email：yanly@zts.com.cn Email：suht@zts.com.cn 相关报告 证券研究报告/固收定期报告 2025 年 12 月 22 日 分析师：吕品 执业证书编号：S0740525060003 Email：lvpin@zts.com.cn 执业证书编号：S0740525070001 1、《大行增仓，基金久期回升》 2025-12-15 2、《大行买短，农商接长》2025-12-08 3、《基金、券商共振抛券》2025-12-01 报告摘要 分析师：严伶怡 本周（12.15-12.19）关注要点：本周资金利率分化，大行融出日均环比增加，基金小 幅加杠杆；存单到期增加，存单到期收益率曲线下移；现券成交来看，买盘主力来自 大行，增持 3Y 以内和 5-10Y 利率债为主，基金净买入规模减少，主要增持短端信用， 大保险继续增配 20-30Y 超长利率债，农商行抛利率债为主。 货币资金面 同业存单与票据 请务必阅读正文之后的重要声明部分 联系人：苏鸿婷 本周（12.15-12.19，下同）共有 6685 亿元逆回购到期。周一至周五央行分别投放逆 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - Last week, the ChinaBond New Composite Index rose 0.06% for the whole week; short - term pure bond and medium - long - term pure bond funds rose 0.02% and 0.02% respectively; the CSI AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond Index and the SSE Benchmark Market - making Corporate Bond Index rose 0.05% and 0.06% respectively [2]. - All types of bond ETF product net values recovered last week. As of December 19, 2025, the 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF performed well, rising 0.46% for the whole week, and the Policy - Financial Bond ETF rose 0.17%. The Convertible Bond ETF and the SSE Convertible Bond ETF rose 0.44% and 0.17% respectively [5]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Funds Flow - As of December 19, 2025, bond - type ETFs had a total net inflow of 20.485 billion yuan in the past week. Interest - rate, credit, and convertible - bond ETFs had net inflows of 2.911 billion yuan, 18.993 billion yuan, and a net outflow of 1.42 billion yuan respectively. Among credit - type ETFs, short - term financing, corporate bonds, and urban investment bonds had net outflows of 2.775 billion yuan, a net inflow of 0.351 billion yuan, and a net outflow of 0.008 billion yuan respectively. Market - making credit bonds had a net inflow of 2.8 billion yuan, and sci - tech innovation bonds had a net inflow of 18.626 billion yuan. As of December 19, 2025, the cumulative net inflows of interest - rate, credit, and convertible - bond ETFs for the year were 74.719 billion yuan, 473.285 billion yuan, and 20.548 billion yuan respectively, with a total of 568.552 billion yuan [4]. 3.2 Net Value Performance - As of December 19, 2025, the 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF performed well, rising 0.46% for the whole week, and the Policy - Financial Bond ETF rose 0.17%. The Convertible Bond ETF and the SSE Convertible Bond ETF rose 0.44% and 0.17% respectively [5]. 3.3 Performance of Credit Bond ETFs and Sci - tech Innovation Bond ETFs - As of December 19, 2025, the median unit net values of credit bond ETFs and sci - tech innovation bond ETFs were 1.0107 and 0.9989 respectively, rising 0.05% and 0.04% for the whole week. Among credit bond ETFs, the E Fund Corporate Bond ETF and the Credit Bond ETF performed relatively well, rising 0.07% for the whole week. Among sci - tech innovation bond ETFs, the Taikang Sci - tech Innovation Bond ETF performed relatively well. As of December 19, 2025, the median discount rates of credit bond ETFs and sci - tech innovation bond ETFs were 30BP and 21BP respectively [6]. 3.4 Duration Tracking of Credit - type ETFs - As of December 19, 2025, the holding durations of short - term financing ETFs, corporate bond ETFs, and urban investment bond ETFs were 0.39 years, 1.82 years, and 2.16 years respectively. Among market - making credit bond ETFs, the median holding durations of products tracking the SSE Market - making Corporate Bond Index and the SZSE Market - making Corporate Bond Index were 3.80 years and 2.61 years respectively. Among sci - tech innovation bond ETFs, the median holding durations of products tracking the AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond Index, the SSE AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond Index, and the SZSE AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond Index were 3.39 years, 3.42 years, and 3.26 years respectively [7].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the industry [5] Core Insights - The pharmaceutical sector is experiencing a phase of oscillation and differentiation, with a recommendation to seize thematic rotation and bottom adjustment opportunities, particularly in the innovative drug supply chain and AI+ sectors [6][13] - The long-term growth driver for the pharmaceutical sector is technological innovation, with key focuses on "continuation of policy benefits," "breakthroughs in frontier technologies," and "international BD transactions" [6][13] - The report highlights the potential of new generation CTLA-4 therapies that address toxicity issues, thereby unlocking market potential [7] Summary by Sections Industry Overview - The pharmaceutical industry comprises 499 listed companies with a total market value of 71,291.29 billion [2] - The industry is currently valued at 25.8 times PE based on 2025 earnings forecasts, with a premium of 10.2% over the overall A-share market [22] Market Dynamics - The report notes a 14.49% return for the pharmaceutical sector since the beginning of 2025, underperforming the CSI 300 index by 1.60 percentage points [19] - Recent market movements show a decline in the pharmaceutical sector, with specific segments like pharmaceutical commerce and medical devices showing positive growth [19][6] Key Recommendations - Focus on companies involved in innovative drug development and AI applications, such as 恒瑞医药 (Hengrui Medicine), 中国生物制药 (China National Pharmaceutical Group), and 康方生物 (Kangfang Biopharma) [6][13] - The report emphasizes the importance of addressing clinical pain points and enhancing safety in new generation immuno-oncology drugs [7] Notable Companies - The report recommends several companies for investment, including 康方生物 (Kangfang Biopharma), 药明合联 (WuXi AppTec), and 泰格医药 (Tigermed) [7][30] - It highlights the performance of specific stocks, noting that the average decline for 中泰医药 (Zhongtai Medicine) was 2.51% this month, while it outperformed the industry by 0.68% this week [29][30]

分析师：徐驰 执业证书编号：S0740519080003 Email：xuchi@zts.com.cn 2020 年以来 A 股结构性行情深度镜鉴 ——AI 行情再审视 证券研究报告/策略专题报告 2025 年 12 月 22 日 执业证书编号：S0740522050001 Email：wangyj09@zts.com.cn 1、《"反内卷"：治理逻辑与产业 影响》2025-11-23 2、《全 A 盈利改善，结构主线明确 — — 2025 年 A 股 三 季 报 点 评 》 2025-11-07 3、《2025 年中报透视：科技景气对 冲 周 期 寻 底 ， 消 费 延 续 分 化 》 2025-09-12 请务必阅读正文之后的重要声明部分 报告摘要 分析师：王永健 核心研判：2020 年以来，A 股市场已系统性告别总量驱动的同涨同跌模式，进入由 宏观动能转换、资金行为变迁与产业逻辑迭代共同驱动的结构性行情新阶段。我们通 过深度复盘三轮代表性行情（消费医药、新能源、泛 AI），揭示不同市场环境下超额 收益的来源演变与核心驱动逻辑的范式转移，并重点对当前处于导入期的泛 AI 行情 与历史上科技泡沫进行对比，论 ...

- The report discusses the "Industry Trend Allocation Model" which indicates that the communication, industrial metals, and energy storage sectors continue to show an upward trend[2][5][7] - The "Two Beta Model" is recommended for the technology sector, focusing on domestic computing power and commercial space[2][5][7] - The "Mid-term Distress Reversal Expectation Model" signals attention to retail and tourism service consumption[2][5][7] Model Construction and Evaluation - **Industry Trend Allocation Model**: This model identifies sectors with upward trends based on historical data and current market conditions. It uses various indicators to determine the sectors that are likely to perform well in the near future[2][5][7] - **Two Beta Model**: This model focuses on sectors with high growth potential, particularly in technology. It evaluates the beta coefficients of different sectors to identify those with higher expected returns relative to the market[2][5][7] - **Mid-term Distress Reversal Expectation Model**: This model identifies sectors that are expected to recover from a period of underperformance. It uses historical performance data and current market signals to predict which sectors will experience a turnaround[2][5][7] Model Backtesting Results - **Industry Trend Allocation Model**: The model continues to show an upward trend in the communication, industrial metals, and energy storage sectors[2][5][7] - **Two Beta Model**: The model recommends the technology sector, focusing on domestic computing power and commercial space, indicating strong growth potential[2][5][7] - **Mid-term Distress Reversal Expectation Model**: The model signals attention to retail and tourism service consumption, suggesting these sectors are poised for recovery[2][5][7]

Report Industry Investment Rating - The industry rating of this report is "Overweight", indicating an expected increase of over 10% compared to the benchmark index in the next 6 - 12 months [24] Core Viewpoints - Since December 2025, although market volatility has increased, the upward trend remains unchanged. The A - share market showed a "V - shaped" reversal last week, and the sentiment for long - positions is still strong [2][6] - This year has seen a significant "stock - strong, bond - weak" trend, but at the year - end, bonds may have a greater reverse impact on stocks. The year - end is a buying opportunity for stocks, following the principle of "buying on small dips, buying more on large dips, and not buying without dips" [2][6] - There will likely be a spring rally. After the year - end, with reduced institutional indicator constraints, funds will form a synergy, and the technology growth sector will have the greatest elasticity [3][6] Summary by Directory Why is December 2025 a "Buy - on - Dip" Opportunity for Stocks? - Extreme stock - bond market conditions at the year - end have increased institutional behavioral differentiation. Bond fluctuations directly affect stocks. Institutions with increased bond investment durations may reduce equity exposure due to solvency and volatility requirements [8] - Banks need to sell long - term bonds due to exceeding EVE indicators, while insurance companies buy long - term bonds. Since Q4 2025, insurance companies have net - bought 313 billion yuan of 10 - year + treasury bonds, and joint - stock banks have net - sold 479 billion yuan. Large bond price fluctuations have led to floating losses for bond buyers [8] - The "Fixed - Income +" strategy has become a negative feedback. The scale of "Fixed - Income +" products expanded significantly in the second half of this year. As of now, new funds in October have not yet made floating profits and have weaker volatility - bearing capacity. In Q3, the scale of "Fixed - Income +" strategy products increased by about 422.5 billion yuan, while the scale of pure - bond funds decreased by 1.6 trillion yuan [9] - The supply and demand of long - term bonds are worrying, and the potential risk of bonds lies in the pressure on the liability side. Even after a sharp decline, the rebound of long - term bonds is weak. The median return of "Fixed - Income +" public funds from October to now is 0.2%, and the maximum loss is - 10.1% [11] Every Decline at the Year - End is a New Opportunity for Stocks - The "relocation" of residents' deposits this round is carried out through institutions. Institutions are responsible for their liability sides, and the liability side has gradually shifted to equity. Asset allocation needs to match the liability side, which requires a slow - bull market [13] - Insurance companies have increased the number of dividend - insurance products since the second half of this year. In November, dividend - insurance products accounted for 48% of new insurance products, and future product layouts will also focus on them, increasing the need to boost investment - end returns [13] - The reinvestment of matured insurance investments is a new variable. The traditional life - insurance products, which account for 55% of the on - sale stock, have a liability - end duration of over 15 years. The 5 - 10Y bonds they hold are due for reinvestment, facing lower yields and thinner capital gains. This may force the asset side to shorten the duration or invest in equity [15] - From the perspective of boosting returns, technology is a necessary choice. The correlation coefficient between the China Bond Index and the CSI Dividend Total Return Index is as high as 0.95, while other broad - based equity indices are negatively correlated with the 10 - year treasury bond index [17] From "Buy - on - Dip" to "Spring Rally" - It is estimated that the incremental funds flowing into the stock market in 2026 will reach 3.1 trillion yuan, and the scale of "Fixed - Income +" will double. If the market adjusts in December, incremental funds are likely to enter the market in advance [19] - At the year - end, stock price movements are affected by bonds and may be more volatile, but it is a buying opportunity for well - capitalized institutions. In the spring rally next year, technology will still be the most worthy sector to focus on [19] - The importance of industry portfolio research is increasing. A "Fixed - Income + Technology" or a combination of technology and other weakly - correlated industries can meet the requirements of the liability side. For "Fixed - Income +" funds, adding 5% technology is better than adding 10% dividends [19]

Group 1: Allocation Demand in Low-Interest Rate Environment - The demand for dividend-related assets is expected to continue increasing, driven by the need for stable cash returns in a low-interest rate and asset scarcity environment [4][9]. - As of December 17, 2025, the tracking scale of dividend index ETFs approached 200 billion, while cash flow-related products reached 24.8 billion since their issuance in February of the same year [9]. Group 2: Comparison of Dividend and Free Cash Flow Indices - The report outlines the selection rules for the CSI Dividend Index and the National Index Free Cash Flow, emphasizing liquidity and consistent dividend payments over the past three years [12]. - The performance comparison shows that both dividend and cash flow indices outperformed the overall market during periods of market downturns, indicating their defensive characteristics [15]. Group 3: Relationship Between Dividend Capability and Willingness - There is a significant positive correlation between dividend yield and free cash flow, indicating that companies with high cash flow are more willing to distribute dividends [51]. - The analysis shows that companies with a history of consistent dividends and strong cash flow tend to have more stable and superior long-term stock price performance [59]. Group 4: "High-Yield Cash Cow" Strategy Construction - The "High-Yield Cash Cow" strategy involves selecting stocks based on high free cash flow rates and consistent dividend payments, excluding financial and real estate sectors [59]. - The strategy has shown strong performance, with the "Cash Cow 50 High Yield 30" combination achieving an annualized return of 25.9% since 2014, outperforming the CSI Dividend Index by 13.5% [62].

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - The report does not mention the industry investment rating [1][2][3] Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - The current main logic of the bond market is the lack of incremental funds, and there is also a "debt repayment theory" that the bond market is repaying the over - drawn "debt" since December last year. The "debt repayment" in terms of bond yields is almost done, and the second stage is the return of the bond's duration through secondary - market influence on primary issuance [3][4][32] - There is short - term allocation value in the bond market, but it needs to be considered separately from the perspectives of banks and insurance. The bank's bond allocation value is weakened due to possible over - limit constraints of interest - sensitive assets, while the allocation value of local bonds is prominent from the insurance perspective [3][19][20] - The anti - reflexivity in the bond market supply - demand framework exists. The EVE indicator can adjust assumptions, and the urgency of the indicator decreases in the second year. The issuance structure of interest - rate bonds is not fixed, and the steepening market may reverse [3][13] - The "stock - strong and bond - weak" consensus expectation needs to be vigilant against the anti - reflexivity caused by over - concentrated expectations in the first quarter [4][37][39] Group 3: Summary According to Related Catalogs 1. Behind the Framework of Bond Market Supply and Demand: Where is the Reflexivity? - The impact of bond market supply and demand on the market mainly has two paths: the rise of equities leads to the decline of the bond market, the withdrawal of trading funds with unstable liabilities, and the over - limit of the bank's EVE indicator after long - term bonds are taken back to the balance sheet; the rise of equities leads to insurance institutions rebalancing to more stocks and less bonds, resulting in a change in the insurance product structure and a decrease in the demand for long - term bonds [8] - If the treasury bond issuance structure is determined by plans such as stable growth and the proportion of ultra - long bonds remains unchanged, the long - term bond supply and demand will face an annual - level "imbalance" logic [8] - The anti - reflexivity of bond market supply and demand lies in that problems that can be deduced perfectly may not have a large impact. The EVE indicator can be adjusted, and the issuance structure of interest - rate bonds is variable [3][13] 2. Abuse of the Concept of "Allocation Disk": Measuring the Current Allocation Value of Bonds - The insurance allocation disk's buying rhythm has been relatively stable, and it mainly has trading demand for 30 - year treasury bonds, while large - account allocation or amortized product accounts still use local bonds of the same term as allocation varieties [3][15][17] - From the bank's perspective, the EVA cost - performance of 30 - year treasury bonds is better than that of mortgage loan interest rates, but the bank's bond allocation value is weakened due to possible over - limit constraints of interest - sensitive assets. From the insurance perspective, the allocation value of local bonds is prominent [3][19][20] - The seasonal "red - start" market of bonds has been advancing year by year, resulting in the anti - reflexivity of seasonal failure this year [3][23] 3. Why Does the Stock - Bond Correlation Fail? - Since October, the rapid expansion of fixed - income + strategy products has not produced a strong profit - making effect. Under the recent market consensus expectation of "stock - strong and bond - weak", the hedging effect of the fixed - income + strategy is average [25][27] - The relationship between liquidity and assets is like that between flour and water. The increase in risk preference may have led to an increase in "flour" with little marginal change in "water", resulting in unstable trading liquidity, and more precise liquidity injection is needed to break the situation [28] 4. How to Quantitatively Understand the Widening of the Yield Spread? - The market generally agrees on the widening of the term spread, with differences mainly in quantification and duration. In December, the 30 - year to 10 - year spread has reached over 40BP, returning to the level at the end of 2022. The market may have over - drawn the rhythm of next year [29] - There may be new factors for the spread to widen further, such as the widening of the bond yield curve in other countries, the possible inadequacy of using the 2022 bull - market term spread to measure in case of a bull - bear conversion, and the possible inadequacy of the current priced term spread in case of re - inflation. However, if the long - term bond issuance term is adjusted from over 20 years to under 10 years, the spread may change from widening to narrowing [31] 5. Summary: The Current Main Line of the Bond Market - The main line of the current bond market is the lack of incremental funds, and the "debt repayment theory" also has a certain basis. The "debt repayment" in terms of bond yields is almost done, and the second stage is the return of the bond's duration [32][34] - In terms of strategy, the 30 - year bond has the highest short - term over - sold betting odds, but the space for one - sided direction betting is limited. The spread between special 6 and special 2 still has room for betting on regression. Medium - and short - term credit bonds and interest - rate bonds with a term of 5 years or less are relatively stable choices [4][37]

Group 1: Core Insights - The report highlights the "Davis Double Hit Strategy," which involves buying stocks with low price-to-earnings (PE) ratios that have growth potential, and selling them once their growth is realized, achieving a multiplier effect on returns [4][7] - The "Net Profit Discontinuity Strategy" focuses on selecting stocks that show significant upward price gaps on the first trading day after earnings announcements, indicating market recognition of earnings surprises [10][11] - The "Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio" is constructed based on investor preferences, targeting stocks with low valuations and strong profitability, aiming for stable excess returns over time [13][18] Group 2: Performance Metrics - The Davis Double Hit Strategy achieved an annualized return of 26.45% during the backtest period from 2010 to 2017, with excess returns exceeding 11% in each of the seven years [4][8] - The Net Profit Discontinuity Strategy has recorded a cumulative absolute return of 65.34% this year, outperforming the benchmark by 40.13% [11][12] - The Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio has shown a relative excess return of 19.48% this year, with a weekly excess return of 1.60% [18]