Report Industry Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly mention the industry investment rating [1][2][3] Core Viewpoints of the Report - The spring rally in the A-share market at the beginning of the year was driven by the fear of missing out, but after the regulatory adjustment of the minimum margin ratio for margin trading, the market shifted from a rapid rise to a slow bull market. The two - margin funds did not leave but switched from high - leverage to low - leverage sectors. The left - hand force of the spring rally came from institutional investors, while foreign capital and margin trading formed the right - hand acceleration, with foreign capital participating more actively [2][15] - The AI industry chain is the main direction where funds form a consensus. The logic of "storage driving computing power, and computing power leading to applications" is expected to be a popular investment direction. Insurance in the financial sector can contribute absolute returns, and industries such as chemicals, home appliances, and panels can be considered for portfolio investment [3][28][29] Summary According to the Directory Market Review: From High - Speed Growth to Active Cooling - At the beginning of the year, the A - share market experienced a spring rally. From the beginning of the year to January 13, the Sci - tech Innovation 50 index rose 9.33%, and sectors such as media, computer, and national defense and military industry led the gains. The proportion of margin trading turnover in the total turnover reached 11.5%, approaching the upper limit of the historical average plus twice the standard deviation [8] - On January 14, the regulatory authorities announced an increase in the margin ratio from 80% to 100%, which was a measure to cool down the over - heated market sentiment. After the adjustment, there was a "hot - cold switch" in the broad - based index and industry structure. In the broad - based index, leveraged funds shifted from small - cap to large - cap stocks. In the industry structure, funds shifted from high - volatility themes to undervalued blue - chips [11][12][13] Slow Bull Trend Established, Leverage Cooling, but Bullish Sentiment Remains - Margin trading accelerated the spring rally but was not the dominant force. The spring rally was mainly driven by domestic institutional investors, with foreign capital and margin trading accelerating on the right - hand side, and foreign capital's participation was more significant. Comparing the trading volume ratios of 9 trading days before and after New Year's Day, the trading volume ratio of north - bound funds increased from 10.2% to 11.6%, while that of margin trading only increased from 11.0% to 11.4% [15] - While broad - based ETFs experienced large - scale outflows, theme - based ETFs continued to see inflows. For example, from January 14 to 16, the average daily net outflow of the CSI 300 ETF reached 14.71 billion yuan, while sectors such as non - ferrous metals, consumption, securities, and medical devices saw capital inflows [19][20] Tightening Micro - environment Accelerates Stock Game, with Both Offensive and Defensive Strategies - The marginal tightening of the micro - liquidity environment led to a stock game and structural optimization. The AI industry chain remained the main line, and some funds flowed back to sectors such as home appliances and chemicals with high safety margins [25] - The capital flow in the AI industry showed a "spiral relay" pattern, starting from storage chips and commercial aerospace, moving to AI applications, and then flowing back to storage and spreading to embodied intelligent robots. The semiconductor and media ETFs remained at the forefront, indicating strong market recognition of the AI industry chain [26] Index Uptrend Slows, Strong Focus on the AI Industry Chain - The AI industry chain's "storage - computing power - application" logic is expected to be a popular investment direction. The performance of US stocks provides a strong reference, and the continuous strength of overseas technology giants has raised the valuation ceiling for A - share counterparts [28] - Insurance in the financial sector can contribute absolute returns. It benefits from the bull market and the rise of the technology sector in terms of asset - side profitability and has defensive properties when offensive sectors adjust [28] - For portfolio investment, technology sectors can provide high returns and elasticity, while sectors such as chemicals, home appliances, and panels with improving fundamentals and healthy chip structures can be used as stable investment options [29]

Core Insights - The report highlights the "Net Profit Gap Strategy" which achieved an absolute return of 6.60% this year, with an annualized return of 29.76% since 2010, outperforming the benchmark by 25.95% [10][11] - The "Davis Double Play Strategy" has shown a historical annualized return of 26.45% from 2010 to 2017, with consistent excess returns exceeding 11% in each year of the backtest period [4][9] - The "Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio" has demonstrated stable excess returns, with a relative excess return of 3.08% this year and 2.17% for the week [13][18] Net Profit Gap Strategy - This strategy focuses on stocks that show a significant upward price gap on the first trading day following earnings announcements, indicating market recognition of earnings surprises [10] - The strategy constructs a portfolio by selecting the top 50 stocks based on the magnitude of the price gap after earnings announcements [10] Davis Double Play Strategy - The strategy involves buying stocks with low price-to-earnings (PE) ratios that have strong growth potential, aiming to sell them once their growth is recognized and PE ratios increase [4][7] - Historical performance shows that the strategy has consistently outperformed the benchmark, achieving a total return of 4.64% as of January 16, 2026, while underperforming the CSI 500 index by 5.63% this year [9][11] Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio - This portfolio is constructed based on investor preferences, including GARP (Growth at a Reasonable Price), growth, and value investing styles [13] - The strategy aims to identify undervalued stocks with strong profitability and growth potential, achieving a stable historical excess return [18]

｜ 证 券 研 究 报 告 ｜ 预防式降温：两融、北向和股指期货的分歧 ——负债行为跟踪 2 0 2 6 . 1 . 1 8 林莎 张可迎 执业证书编号： S0740525080001 邮 箱：zhangky04@zts.com.cn 中 泰 证 券 研 究 所 专 业 ｜ 领 先 ｜ 深 度 ｜ 诚 信 执业证书编号：S0740525060004 邮 箱：linsha@zts.com.cn 摘要 开年第二周，市场略有降温。出现以下值得关注的现象： 第一，两融新规防止过热。1月14日，经中国证监会批准，沪深北交易所发布通知调整融资保证金比例，将投资者融资买入证券时的融资保证金最低比例从80%提 高至100%，相关安排自1月19日起正式施行。 1）在市场走向过热之前的"预防式"降温，慢牛趋势确立。开年以来两融余额持续上升，截至1月13日，两融余额达到2.68万亿，超过2015年和2021年高点（分 别为2.3万亿和1.9万亿）；两融余额占流通市值比重达到2.58%，略超2022年3月高点（2.55%），离2015年高点（4.7%）还有不小的距离。从两融交易额来看， 本周两融交易额占A股交易额比重略低于"均值+2 ...

- The report introduces a **market timing system** that uses the distance between the 20-day moving average and the 120-day moving average of the WIND All A Index to determine market trends. The system identifies an uptrend when the short-term moving average is above the long-term moving average, with a significant distance threshold of 3%[2][6][11] - The **industry trend allocation model** is highlighted, which signals opportunities in specific sectors. For the medium term, the "distressed reversal expectation model" suggests focusing on innovative healthcare. The "TWO BETA model" continues to recommend the technology sector, particularly AI applications and commercial aerospace after adjustments. In the short term, the "earnings trend model" points to opportunities in computing power (e.g., Sci-Tech Chip ETF, code 588200) and energy storage batteries (e.g., Energy Storage Battery ETF, code 159566)[2][5][7] - The **position management model** is used to determine stock allocation levels. Based on the WIND All A Index's valuation and trend, the model recommends an 80% stock allocation for absolute return products[5][7] - The **valuation indicators** for the WIND All A Index are also discussed. The PE ratio is at the 90th percentile, indicating a relatively high valuation, while the PB ratio is at the 50th percentile, representing a medium level[5][7][11]

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the coal industry, indicating a positive outlook for investment opportunities in this sector [5]. Core Insights - The coal market is expected to experience a recovery in demand due to a cold wave, which may stimulate heating needs and lead to increased procurement [7]. - The report highlights that the coal price is likely to stabilize and potentially increase in the latter part of January, driven by a combination of steady supply and moderate demand recovery [7]. - The investment strategy suggests positioning in coal stocks that have shown resilience and potential for growth, particularly those with strong dividend yields and low valuations [8]. Summary by Sections Basic Conditions - The coal industry comprises 37 listed companies with a total market capitalization of 1,905.163 billion yuan and a circulating market value of 1,857.669 billion yuan [2]. Key Company Performance - Major companies such as China Shenhua, Yancoal Energy, and Shanxi Coking Coal are highlighted for their strong earnings per share (EPS) and price-to-earnings (PE) ratios, with recommendations to buy or hold based on their growth potential [5]. Coal Price Tracking - The report notes fluctuations in coal prices, with a recent increase in coking coal prices by 150 yuan/ton, while thermal coal prices have seen a slight decline [8]. - The average daily production of thermal coal from sample mines is reported at 5.467 million tons, reflecting a week-on-week increase of 0.28% [8]. Inventory and Supply Chain - Coal inventory levels at major ports have increased, with a total of 27.012 million tons reported as of January 17, indicating a year-on-year increase of 5.50% [7]. - The report anticipates a tightening supply in the near term due to ongoing safety inspections and the upcoming holiday season affecting production [7]. Investment Opportunities - The report identifies three main investment lines: 1. Companies with strong dividend yields and low valuations, such as China Shenhua and Zhongmei Energy [8]. 2. Companies with growth potential based on their production capacity, such as Yancoal Energy and Shanxi Coking Coal [8]. 3. Companies positioned for recovery in coking coal prices, including Lu'an Huanneng and Pingmei Shenma [8].

Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the REITs industry [2] Core Insights - The REITs index experienced a decline of 0.36% this week, while the Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.57% and the CSI 300 Index decreased by 0.57% [5][20] - The report highlights the correlation of REITs with various indices, showing a correlation of 0.23 with 10-year government bonds, 0.07 with 1-year government bonds, and 0.65 with convertible bonds [20] - The report emphasizes the strong allocation attributes of REITs in a stable economic environment, suggesting investors pay attention to sector rotation and expansion opportunities [9] Industry Overview - The REITs industry consists of 78 listed companies with a total market capitalization of 2,199.24 billion yuan and a circulating market capitalization of 1,230.12 billion yuan [2] - The report notes significant events, including the listing of additional shares for 华夏华润有巢 REIT on January 12 and 中航京能光伏 REIT on January 15 [12] Market Performance - The trading volume for the week was 2.44 billion yuan, representing a decrease of 25.3%, with an average turnover rate of 0.4% [35] - The report details the performance of various REIT sectors, with significant declines in trading volumes for highways (-36.6%) and consumption (-37.5%), while ecological environmental REITs saw an increase of 13.4% [35] Valuation Situation - The estimated yield for bonds ranged from -0.31% to 10.93%, with 平安广州广河 having the highest yield at 10.93% and 创金合信首农 the lowest at -0.31% [37] - The P/NAV ratio for the REITs is reported to be between 0.73 and 1.79, with 嘉实物美消费 having the highest P/NAV at 1.79 and 华夏中国交建 the lowest at 0.73 [37]

A H 股市场周度观察（1 月第 2 周） 证券研究报告/策略定期报告 2026 年 01 月 17 日 分析师：徐驰 执业证书编号：S0740519080003 Email：xuchi@zts.com.cn 二、港股： 请务必阅读正文之后的重要声明部分 执业证书编号：S0740520120003 Email：zhangwy01@zts.com.cn 2026-01-11 2、《A H 股市场周度观察（1 月第 1 周）》2026-01-10 3、《军工行情底线牢固，传媒或迎 布局良机》2026-01-09 报告摘要 一、A 股： 分析师：张文宇 【市场走势】本周 A 股市场呈现分化走势，结构性行情特征明显。中小盘及成长风格 板块表现突出，其中小盘成长与中盘成长指数涨幅居前。宽基指数方面，中证 500、 中小 100 等指数录得上涨，而上证指数、沪深 300 等权重指数则小幅回调。市场成交 额显著放大，本周日均成交额达到 3.47 万亿，环比增长 21.5%，显示市场活跃度明 显提升。 相关报告 1、《开年市场新高后或如何演绎？》 【深入剖析】本周 A 股市场展现出显著的结构性行情。成交额的显著放大（日均 3 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, indicating an expected relative performance increase of over 15% against the benchmark index within the next 6 to 12 months [7]. Core Views - The company is engaging in a strategic investment by subscribing to new shares of Jitu Express, which will enhance its international strategy and expand its market presence [5]. - The company aims to leverage synergies with Jitu Express to improve its end-to-end logistics solutions and enhance operational efficiency in both domestic and international markets [5]. - The company is adjusting its profit forecasts for 2025-2027, expecting net profits of 10,879 million, 12,011 million, and 13,843 million yuan respectively, with corresponding earnings per share of 2.16, 2.38, and 2.75 yuan [5][6]. Financial Summary - Revenue projections for the company are as follows: 258,409 million yuan for 2023, 284,420 million yuan for 2024, and expected growth to 373,115 million yuan by 2027, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of approximately 10% [2][6]. - The net profit for 2023 is projected at 8,234 million yuan, increasing to 10,170 million yuan in 2024, and further to 13,843 million yuan by 2027, indicating a robust growth trajectory [2][6]. - The company's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is expected to decrease from 24.0 in 2023 to 14.3 by 2027, suggesting an improving valuation over time [2][6].

Inflation Data Summary - December CPI in the U.S. increased by 0.3% month-on-month, compared to an average increase of 0.1% in October and November[4] - Year-on-year CPI growth remained at 2.7%, consistent with the previous value[4] - Core CPI rose by 0.2% month-on-month and 2.6% year-on-year, matching the prior year's growth[4] Price Components - Energy prices increased by 0.3% month-on-month and 2.3% year-on-year, down from a previous 4.2%[7] - Food CPI rose by 0.7% month-on-month and 3.1% year-on-year, compared to a prior increase of 2.6%[7] - Core goods prices remained flat, with used car prices dropping by 1.1% month-on-month, indicating weak durable goods demand[8] Market Reactions and Expectations - Following the CPI release, market expectations for interest rate cuts in 2026 remained stable, with FedWatch indicating an average of 2.2 cuts (56.2 basis points) compared to 2.1 cuts (51.6 basis points) prior to the data release[8] - The overall CPI and core inflation performance aligned with market expectations, indicating a moderate inflation environment[8] Future Outlook - Confirmation of the inflation path requires one to two "cleaner" data windows, with potential upward pressures from delayed economic activity due to government shutdowns and tariff pass-through effects starting in early 2026[9] - Downward pressures include falling crude oil prices and declining food commodity indices, alongside indicators suggesting a downward trend in housing rent CPI growth[9]

Group 1: Exchange Settlement Overview - The estimated "pending settlement" amount for enterprises is approximately $930 billion, accumulated from early 2022 to November 2025[1] - The willingness of export enterprises to settle foreign exchange is expected to improve in 2025 due to the RMB entering an appreciation cycle and strong performance of Chinese financial assets[1] - By the end of 2026, if 20% of the pending settlement is realized, it could lead to an increase in M1 by approximately 1.3 trillion RMB, contributing about 1.2 percentage points to M1 growth[1] Group 2: Impact on Liquidity and Market - Enterprise settlement essentially converts foreign exchange assets into RMB deposits, affecting the balance sheets of central banks, commercial banks, and enterprises[1] - The relationship between M1 growth and PPI typically shows that M1 growth leads PPI growth by 2-3 quarters, but the current M1 increase may have limited impact on PPI due to insufficient effective demand[1] - High-risk enterprises may channel some of the funds from settlements into the stock market, potentially providing incremental capital to the A-share market[1] Group 3: Risks and Considerations - Risks include domestic policy effectiveness falling short of expectations, potential data distortion from third-party sources, and the possibility of measurement deviations[1] - The analysis indicates that while M1 growth is expected, its direct influence on corporate profitability may be limited due to the different driving factors compared to previous cycles[1]