Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - In June, both social financing and credit showed seasonal rebounds with significant growth. The stock of social financing increased by 4.2 trillion yuan, and RMB loans increased by 2.24 trillion yuan. M2 maintained stable growth, M1 increased significantly, and M0 maintained high growth [3]. - The significant growth of social financing this month was stronger than in previous years, with the increased issuance of government bonds being the core driving force. The structure of new social financing changed from being dominated by government bonds in the previous month to "credit - based, government bonds as a supplement" [4]. - New credit increased seasonally and was slightly higher than the same period last year, mainly driven by short - term corporate loans, and medium - and long - term corporate loans also increased [4]. - The sharp rise of M1 this month may be due to factors such as the May interest rate cut, the central bank's use of outright reverse repurchases, the decline of the ten - year Treasury bond interest rate, and the acceleration of fiscal expenditure flowing into the real economy [5]. - In terms of corporate direct financing, there was differentiation among industries, and attention should be paid to the decline of real estate financing. Corporate bill financing decreased significantly, indicating an improvement in the corporate financing environment [7][8]. - The problem of insufficient currency activation has improved under the continuous acceleration of government leverage, but there are still concerns about the corporate balance sheet. The scissors gap between M2 and M1 has narrowed, but the expansion of the balance sheet of large - scale industrial enterprises depends on debt rather than profit [8]. - The policy combination of "fiscal leadership + monetary support" has achieved significant results. In the future, each sector has room for further development, and the enterprise sector may take over the social financing in the future [9]. - Currently, it is a critical transition period of "government - driven → enterprise takeover → household follow - up". The rebound of M1 this month may be a verification point of the start of recovery, and policy support is still necessary [10]. Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs Data Observation - **Social Financing and Credit**: In June, the stock of social financing increased by 4.2 trillion yuan, with an year - on - year increase of 0.91 trillion yuan. RMB loans increased by 2.24 trillion yuan, with an year - on - year increase of 110 billion yuan. The growth of social financing was mainly driven by the high - growth of government bond financing year - on - year [3][4]. - **Money Supply**: M2 increased by 8.3% year - on - year, 0.4 percentage points higher than last month. M1 increased by 4.6% year - on - year, 2.3 percentage points higher than last month. M0 increased by 12% year - on - year, 0.1 percentage points slower than last month [3]. - **New Credit Structure**: New credit increased seasonally, mainly driven by short - term corporate loans, and medium - and long - term corporate loans also increased. On the supply side, banks tend to increase short - term corporate loans to meet the end - of - quarter assessment requirements. On the demand side, the PMI production and new order indexes in June showed that production and orders were recovering [4]. Depth Perspective - **Fiscal Deposits**: The financing volume of government bonds was slightly lower than in previous years, and the new fiscal deposits were at a historically low level. The difference between new government bond financing and fiscal deposits increased, indicating that government funds were flowing into the real economy [6]. - **Corporate Direct Financing**: There was differentiation among industries in corporate direct financing. The net financing of energy, materials, optional consumption, and information technology industries increased year - on - year, while that of medical, industrial, communication services, and real estate industries decreased. Attention should be paid to the decline of real estate financing [7][8]. - **Bill Financing**: Corporate bill financing decreased significantly this month, and there was no obvious bill - padding phenomenon. The bill financing interest rate center decreased compared with May, indicating an improvement in the corporate financing environment [8]. Future Outlook - **Overall Economic Pattern**: The problem of insufficient currency activation has improved, but there are still concerns about the corporate balance sheet. The scissors gap between M2 and M1 has narrowed, but the expansion of the balance sheet of large - scale industrial enterprises depends on debt rather than profit. The current cycle still depends on policy support to boost household currency activity [8]. - **Policy Level**: The policy combination of "fiscal leadership + monetary support" has achieved significant results. In the future, the government sector can release fiscal space through debt resolution, the enterprise sector can improve its ability to increase leverage through debt structure optimization, and the household sector is in a weak recovery state [9]. - **Bond Market**: Currently, it is still a liquidity - loose pattern dominated by policies. Although social financing has entered the fiscal effect verification period, the weak fundamentals remain unchanged. The downward adjustment space of the bond market may be limited, and investors should actively seize the opportunities brought by emotional changes [10].

Core Insights - The report emphasizes the flourishing approval of new drugs and highlights the importance of focusing on technological tracks and opportunities within the industry chain [1][5] - It suggests a dual growth strategy combining internal and external growth, particularly in the context of the imminent patent cliff for IO1.0 and the increasing recognition of Chinese innovative pharmaceutical companies globally [5] Industry Overview - The report notes a significant recovery in domestic healthcare policies, including the integration of commercial insurance into the medical insurance system and the inclusion of high-priced innovative drugs in the Class B medical insurance catalog [5] - The overall revenue growth rate for chemical pharmaceutical companies in 2024 is projected at 4.10%, a substantial increase from 0.24% in 2023, while the net profit growth rate is expected to be 51.66% [12][15] Investment Opportunities - Short-term focus is recommended on certain tracks with high certainty, such as IO+ADC, while long-term investments should target new technologies with significant potential, including small nucleic acids and CAR-T [5] - The report categorizes various technological tracks for investment, including combinations of PD-1 with other mechanisms and innovative solutions for unmet clinical needs [5] Company Valuations - The report provides a comparative valuation of unprofitable innovative pharmaceutical companies, highlighting their market capitalizations and projected revenues for 2024 to 2027 [6] - It also presents a comparative valuation of profitable innovative pharmaceutical companies, detailing their market capitalizations and projected net profits for the same period [8] Performance Review - The report reviews the performance of pharmaceutical companies in 2024 and Q1 2025, noting that while the overall industry faced temporary pressure, gross profit margins have steadily improved [12][15] - It highlights that many small and mid-cap innovative pharmaceutical companies have turned profitable in Q1 2025, indicating a positive trend in the sector [18]

Investment Rating - Industry Rating: Overweight [1] Core Views - The report highlights the strengthening expectations for photovoltaic supply-side reforms and the high demand for domestic energy storage procurement [1][4] - The photovoltaic sector has seen a significant increase in silicon material prices, while silicon wafer and battery prices have stabilized [15][21] - The energy storage market remains robust, with data from June indicating continued high demand, particularly in Europe [4][29] - The hydrogen energy sector is experiencing positive development, with the world's largest green hydrogen project recently launched [38][42] - The electric grid sector has seen rapid investment growth, with over 30 billion yuan allocated to key summer peak projects [43][44] Summary by Sections Photovoltaics - Silicon material prices have surged, with N-type dense material prices rising to 34,000 yuan/ton and N-type recycled material prices to 37,000 yuan/ton [17] - The overall market is in a competitive phase, with policy expectations increasing but terminal demand recovering weakly [15][16] - Investment suggestions include focusing on companies with higher certainty in the BC technology industry trend, such as Longi Green Energy and Aiko Solar [16][22] Wind Power - Multiple large-scale offshore wind projects have been announced, with significant EPC contracts awarded [23][24] - Investment recommendations include undervalued stocks and those benefiting from offshore wind projects, such as Mingyang Smart Energy and Goldwind [28] Energy Storage - The report emphasizes the promotion of high-power charging facilities and the growth of household storage in Europe due to frequent power outages [29][34] - The National Development and Reform Commission aims to establish over 100,000 high-power charging facilities by the end of 2027 [29] Hydrogen Energy - The report notes the successful launch of the world's largest green hydrogen project, which aims to produce 1.52 million tons of green ammonia [38][42] - The focus is on developing a new energy system that integrates wind, solar, and hydrogen energy [38] Electric Grid Equipment - The report states that investments in the electric grid have exceeded 30 billion yuan, with 162 key summer peak projects fully operational [43] - The report suggests focusing on companies involved in high-voltage transmission and distribution equipment [44] Electric Vehicles - Global lithium battery production in the first half of 2025 increased by 48% year-on-year, with major companies like CATL and BYD leading the market [45][47] - Investment recommendations include companies with stable profitability in the battery and structural components sectors [45] Humanoid Robots - The humanoid robot sector is entering a small-scale production phase, with significant investments in technology and key components [50] - Investment focus areas include companies with solid core businesses and those involved in new technology developments [50] Automotive Parts - The report indicates a 15.1% year-on-year increase in wholesale automotive parts in June, suggesting a stable market outlook [51] - Recommendations include focusing on companies with higher certainty in performance and new product developments [51]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Overweight" [6] Core Insights - The report highlights the launch of four generations of GPU architectures by the company, which includes solutions for AI computing, professional graphics acceleration, desktop graphics acceleration, and intelligent SoC products [1][2][25] - The company aims to provide a comprehensive computing acceleration infrastructure and one-stop solutions globally, focusing on AI computing support for various industries [17][25] - The company has achieved significant revenue growth, with AI computing products projected to contribute 3.36 billion yuan, accounting for 77.63% of total revenue in 2024 [1][2] Summary by Sections Section 1: Company Overview - The company has undergone three development phases, focusing on full-function GPUs to support digital transformation across industries [17] - The company has successfully launched four generations of GPU architectures from 2021 to 2024, with products catering to various market needs [1][28] Section 2: AI Computing Products - The company’s AI computing products are expected to generate significant revenue, with a projected 42.42% of total revenue coming from AI computing clusters in 2024 [1][2] - The company has developed a diverse product line, including AI computing boards and modules, with a focus on high-performance applications [1][2][25] Section 3: Technological Advancements - The company has advanced its manufacturing capabilities, achieving rapid iteration from 12nm to 7nm processes and enhancing its domestic supply chain [2][7] - The company has developed a heterogeneous computing architecture integrating GPU, CPU, NPU, and VPU, leading to the successful production of the "Yangtze" SoC chip [2][32] Section 4: Market Performance - The report provides insights into the performance of the electronic industry, comparing it with the CSI 300 index, indicating a competitive landscape [3][4] - The company has established a strong investor base, having completed six rounds of financing totaling over 4.5 billion yuan, with notable investors including Sequoia China and Tencent [8][9]

Core Insights - The report indicates that the current real estate market is experiencing a phase of valuation recovery, supported by policy expectations, with potential for further upside in the coming weeks [3][7][24] - The banking sector is expected to maintain a trend of upward momentum, driven by high dividend yields and stable operational logic, despite recent market fluctuations [6][21][23] Market Perspectives - The upcoming economic data release on July 15 is anticipated to show resilience, with GDP growth expected to be in the range of 5.1% to 5.3%, slightly lower than the previous quarter's 5.4% [4][14][18] - The divergence in CPI and PPI trends suggests a potential for mild price improvements, which could positively impact the market if the GDP growth exceeds expectations [4][14][15] Industry Allocation - The banking sector is projected to see a significant increase in dividend yields, with short-term expectations of a rise of 0.3% to 0.62% before August, and a further increase of 0.6% to 1.21% by early 2026 [6][21][23] - The real estate sector is currently in a typical down-cycle phase, with historical patterns suggesting a potential for a 5% to 15% increase in the index over the next month, driven by policy easing [7][24][26] Specific Opportunities - The report highlights three main investment themes: 1. Banks and insurance companies with strong dividend stability and long-term capital inflow [30] 2. Real estate stocks benefiting from anticipated policy easing [30] 3. Sectors with robust demand support, including rare earths, precious metals, and agricultural chemicals [31]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Short - term liquidity depends on central bank's injections. Investors can maintain duration and seize opportunities from falling interest rates [2]. - In mid - July, there are both positive and negative factors for the liquidity. The key variable is the central bank's roll - over of outright reverse repos. DR007 is likely to fluctuate between 1.40% - 1.50%. There are few negative factors for the bond market. If there is a tightening trend in liquidity, a further decline in large banks' lending volume should be observed first [3]. 3. Summary According to Related Catalogs 3.1 This Week's Institutional Behavior Review: Is There a Tightening Trend in Liquidity? - **Yield Curve**: Yields of treasury bonds and China Development Bank bonds generally increased. For treasury bonds, 1Y yield rose 3bp, 3Y and 5Y rose 4bp, 7Y rose 3bp, 10Y rose about 3bp, 15Y and 30Y rose 2bp. For China Development Bank bonds, 1Y yield rose about 4bp, 3Y rose 4bp, 5Y rose about 6bp, 7Y and 10Y rose 3bp, 15Y rose 2bp, and 30Y changed less than 1bp [13]. - **Term Spread**: The spread between treasury bonds and China Development Bank bonds increased. For treasury bonds, the short - term spread narrowed and the long - term spread widened. For China Development Bank bonds, the short - term spread was divided, and the medium - and long - term spread narrowed [16]. 3.2 Bond Market Leverage and Liquidity - **Leverage Ratio**: It dropped to 107.3%. From July 7th to July 11th, 2025, the leverage ratio decreased continuously during the week. As of July 11th, it was about 107.3%, down 0.69pct from last Friday and 0.58pct from this Monday [20]. - **Average Daily Turnover of Pledged Repurchase**: The average daily turnover of pledged repurchase this week was 8.2 trillion yuan, with an average overnight proportion of 89.57%. From July 7th to July 11th, the average daily turnover was 8.2 trillion yuan, up 0.61 trillion yuan from last week. The average overnight turnover was 7.4 trillion yuan, up 0.55 trillion yuan month - on - month, and the average overnight proportion was 89.57%, down 0.14pct month - on - month [26][27]. - **Liquidity**: Banks' lending volume continued to decline. From July 7th to July 11th, the lending volume of the banking system decreased. On July 11th, large banks and policy banks' net lending was 4.65 trillion yuan; joint - stock banks and urban and rural commercial banks' average daily net lending was 0.66 trillion yuan, and on July 11th, they had a net inflow of 0.91 trillion yuan. The banking system's net lending was 3.74 trillion yuan [31]. 3.3 Duration of Medium - and Long - Term Bond Funds - **Median Duration**: It dropped to 2.87 years. From July 7th to July 11th, the median duration of medium - and long - term bond funds was 2.87 years (de - leveraged) and 3.21 years (leveraged). On July 11th, the median duration (de - leveraged) was 2.87 years, down 0.01 year from last Friday; the median duration (leveraged) was 3.21 years, up 0.04 year from last Friday [45]. - **Duration of Interest - Rate Bond Funds**: It rose to 3.93 years. Among different types of bond funds, the median duration (leveraged) of interest - rate bond funds rose to 3.93 years, up 0.02 year from last Friday; the median duration (leveraged) of credit bond funds rose to 2.98 years, up 0.01 year from last Friday; the median duration (de - leveraged) of interest - rate bond funds was 3.55 years, up 0.09 year from last Friday; the median duration (de - leveraged) of credit bond funds was 2.73 years, down 0.02 year from last Friday [48]. 3.4 Category Strategy Comparison - **China - US Yield Spread**: It generally widened. The 1Y spread widened 3bp, 2Y widened 7bp, 3Y widened 6bp, 5Y widened 5bp, 7Y widened 3bp, 10Y widened about 3bp, and 30Y widened 2bp [52]. - **Implied Tax Rate**: The short - term spread widened, and the long - term spread narrowed. As of July 11th, the spread between China Development Bank bonds and treasury bonds widened 1bp for 1Y, changed less than 1bp for 3Y, widened 2bp for 5Y, widened 1bp for 7Y and 10Y, changed less than 1bp for 15Y, and narrowed 2bp for 30Y [53]. 3.5 Changes in Bond Lending Balance On July 11th, the concentration of lending for active 10Y treasury bonds, active 10Y China Development Bank bonds, second - active 10Y China Development Bank bonds, and active 30Y treasury bonds showed an upward trend, while the concentration of second - active 10Y treasury bonds showed a downward trend. For all institutions, it showed an upward trend [56].

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Overweight" [1] Core Insights - The report highlights the ongoing global biotechnology revolution, emphasizing its integration into economic and social development, addressing major challenges such as health, climate change, and food security. The National Development and Reform Commission has issued the "14th Five-Year Plan for Bioeconomic Development," indicating a trillion-yuan market potential in the bioeconomy [1] - The Huazhong Securities Synthetic Biology Index, which includes 58 companies involved in synthetic biology and related technologies, decreased by 2.50% to 1484.292 during the week of June 30 to July 4, 2025, underperforming compared to the Shanghai Composite Index and the ChiNext Index [2][14] Summary by Sections 1.1 Secondary Market Performance - The synthetic biology sector experienced a decline of 2.50%, ranking 32nd among various sectors during the week of June 30 to July 4, 2025 [14] 1.2 Company Business Progress - Meihua Biological completed an overseas acquisition for HMO and high-end amino acid production, with a transaction value of approximately 8.33 billion yuan [21] - Weiyuan Biological's alolose sugar received approval as a new food ingredient, becoming the first company in China to produce it through fermentation technology [21] - Jinbo Biological secured a 3.4 billion yuan investment from Yangshengtang and Hangzhou Jiushi, enhancing its R&D capabilities in collagen technology [22] - Avantium signed a supply agreement for fully plant-based PEF packaging materials, emphasizing sustainability [24] - Syzygy Plasmonics announced the launch of a sustainable aviation fuel facility, aiming to produce over 350,000 gallons annually [24] 1.3 Industry Financing Tracking - Synthetic biology companies are accelerating financing, with nearly a hundred firms completing new rounds of funding since the beginning of 2025. Zhejiang Rongrui Technology raised nearly 100 million yuan in a Pre-A round [27][28]

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: IPCA Factor Model - **Model Construction Idea**: The IPCA factor model is designed to explain the returns of 46 option strategies, aiming to capture 80% of their returns while minimizing abnormal monthly returns to near zero[22] - **Model Construction Process**: The model integrates factors such as transaction costs and heterogeneous risk aversion to optimize derivative pricing. It also addresses the absence of reliable credit or liquidity premiums in pre-WWI corporate bond returns[25] - **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates strong explanatory power for option strategy returns and highlights the role of transaction costs in driving return volatility[22][25] 2. Model Name: Neural Functionally Generated Portfolios (NFGP) - **Model Construction Idea**: NFGP combines Transformer and diffusion models to enhance probabilistic time-series forecasting accuracy and improve decision reliability[35] - **Model Construction Process**: The model reduces forecasting errors by 42% compared to benchmarks and introduces dual uncertainty indicators to optimize portfolio decisions[35] - **Model Evaluation**: The model outperforms traditional approaches in terms of predictive accuracy and robustness in decision-making[35] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. IPCA Factor Model - **Explanatory Power**: 80% of option strategy returns explained[22] - **Abnormal Monthly Returns**: Approaching zero[22] 2. Neural Functionally Generated Portfolios (NFGP) - **Forecasting Error Reduction**: 42% compared to benchmarks[35] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: "Betting Against (Bad) Beta" (BABB) - **Factor Construction Idea**: The BABB factor improves the "Betting Against Beta" (BAB) strategy by managing transaction costs and isolating bad beta components[15] - **Factor Construction Process**: The factor is constructed using double sorting to isolate bad beta components. It achieves an annualized alpha exceeding 6%, independent of traditional sentiment indicators[15] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor demonstrates strong performance in low-risk investment strategies, with significant alpha generation[15] 2. Factor Name: High-Speed Rail Network Centrality - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor captures the impact of high-speed rail network centrality on corporate bond spreads by improving the information environment and regional trust[25] - **Factor Construction Process**: The factor is derived from the centrality of high-speed rail networks, showing a significant reduction in corporate bond spreads, particularly for non-state-owned enterprises and non-central cities[25] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor effectively highlights the role of infrastructure in reducing financing costs and improving capital allocation efficiency[25] 3. Factor Name: Residual-Based Structural Change Detection - **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor robustly detects structural changes in factor models, accommodating over-specified factor numbers and error correlations[17] - **Factor Construction Process**: The factor employs residual-based tests to identify smooth or abrupt structural changes in factor models, enhancing robustness in model evaluation[17] - **Factor Evaluation**: The factor is highly effective in detecting structural changes and improving the robustness of factor model evaluations[17] --- Factor Backtesting Results 1. "Betting Against (Bad) Beta" (BABB) - **Annualized Alpha**: >6%[15] 2. High-Speed Rail Network Centrality - **Corporate Bond Spread Reduction**: Significant, especially for non-state-owned enterprises and non-central cities[25] 3. Residual-Based Structural Change Detection - **Robustness**: Effective in detecting both smooth and abrupt structural changes[17]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" (maintained) [1] Core Views - The company reported Q1 FY26 earnings with revenue of $9.83 billion, a year-over-year increase of 7.6%, and subscription revenue of $9.30 billion, up 8.3% year-over-year [3][4] - The acquisition of Informatica for $8 billion is aimed at strengthening the company's data capabilities, with AgentForce completing 8,000 transactions in Q1, nearly half of which were paid collaborations [4][5] - The company's Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) reached a record high of $60.9 billion, reflecting a year-over-year growth of 13% [5] - The company has raised its full-year revenue guidance for FY26 to $41-41.3 billion, driven by growth in data cloud and AgentForce [6][7] Financial Performance - For FY26, the company expects non-GAAP net profits of $10.96 billion, with year-over-year growth rates of 10.4%, 14.8%, and 15.6% for FY26, FY27, and FY28 respectively [7][9] - The company’s gross margin is projected to improve from 77.2% in FY25 to 79.5% in FY28 [9] - The company’s operating margin is expected to remain stable, with GAAP operating margin at 21.6% and non-GAAP operating margin at 34% for FY26 [6][9]

Group 1: Report Overview - The report is a fixed - income review report titled "Why is the Divergence Trend between CPI and PPI Intensifying? - Review of June Price Data" dated July 9, 2025 [1][2] - The chief analyst is Yan Ziqi, and the analyst is Hong Ziyan [2] Group 2: Data Observation CPI Data - In June, CPI was up 0.1% year - on - year, rising 0.2 pct from the previous month and moving from negative to positive. The month - on - month CPI decreased by 0.1%, with the decline narrowing by 0.1 pct from the previous month and the value being at a relatively high level in the same period over the years [2] - Core CPI continued to rise, indicating a possible demand recovery, but it was uneven. The year - on - year increase in CPI was stronger than that of core CPI mainly due to the reduced drag from the energy item. After removing the impact of food and energy, core inflation continued to rise year - on - year, reflecting a demand recovery. However, the recovery of consumer demand was mainly supported by sub - items such as transportation, communication, rent, water and electricity, and household appliances, while CPI in areas such as clothing, education, tourism, and household services decreased month - on - month [3] - Service CPI continued to grow, and consumer goods CPI continued to recover. The demand structure continued to shift from food to consumption and services. The decline in consumer CPI narrowed, and service CPI had been growing for 5 months, with the year - on - year value remaining at 0.5% as in the previous month. Food prices remained stable, and the increase in vegetable prices led to a narrowing of the decline in food CPI [3] PPI Data - The month - on - month PPI of consumer goods weakened. The reason was that during the subsidy gap period, the path for demand to spread from policy - driven areas to other consumer goods areas slowed down compared with the previous month. Durable consumer goods declined month - on - month in June [4] - External demand suppressed the prices of the processing industry, while the input factor of international crude oil drove the price recovery of upstream industries, and PPI entered a weak equilibrium state. In June, the decline in external demand orders in the PMI indicated a weakening of external demand, leading to a month - on - month decline in the PPI of the processing industry. High temperatures restricted infrastructure construction, resulting in demand lagging behind material supply. The decline in coal prices due to new energy substitution and over - capacity continued to reduce PPI prices, but the increase in international crude oil prices repaired the drag on domestic related industries, and deflation in upstream industries such as mining and raw material industries eased [4] Group 3: In - depth Perspective From the Perspective of Resident Income - Since March, the year - on - year decline in rent has narrowed to - 0.1% and remained unchanged for 4 consecutive months. The stable and flat trend of rent may indicate that the income improvement trend has stalled, and income recovery is the core driving force for the recovery of total demand and the return of price levels to positive [6] From the Perspective of Corporate Activity - In June, the year - on - year price of pork dropped to - 8.5%, and the month - on - month price dropped to - 1.2%. The decline in pork prices was mainly due to oversupply and also reflected a contraction in pork demand in June, suggesting a possible structural decline in factory labor demand. The continuous squeeze on corporate profits in previous months still had a lagging impact on the economy, and the significant decline in the PMI of small enterprises and employment in the manufacturing and service industries in June confirmed the contraction in pork demand. The month - on - month decline in liquor prices was 0.3%, the same as the average in the past 5 years, implying that the business activity of small enterprises remained weak [6] From the Perspective of Corporate Price Transmission - The increase in household appliance prices in June may be an illusion during the policy window period. The month - on - month increase in household appliance CPI was likely due to manufacturers adjusting prices during the subsidy gap period. The price model of leading brands was to "raise the marked price and offset with subsidies" to achieve a nominal price increase. In June, the subsidy amount in many places was exhausted, leading to a decrease in the subsidy part and an increase in the final product price. The price increase during the subsidy gap period may be a game behavior to transfer inventory pressure [7] High - frequency Data - International oil prices showed a downward trend, and PPI would face downward pressure in the next stage. The marginal price of Nanhua industrial products began to rise, but the price of rebar continued to decline. Although the third batch of 300 billion dual - purpose funds had been issued, high - temperature weather restricted demand release and limited physical construction. Glass prices continued to decline, indicating no improvement in the real estate market [7] Group 4: Future Outlook CPI Outlook - Currently, CPI has achieved an upward breakthrough with a marginal reduction in external interference items, but the demand recovery is uneven, and the recovery trend needs to be consolidated. High - frequency data shows that international oil prices have started to decline, and with the easing of local geopolitical conflicts, it is highly likely that the oil price center will shift downward in July, which may drive next month's CPI down. In July, the next batch of fiscal funds will start to be in place, and the household appliance sub - item of CPI may decline. Due to the slowdown in the transmission to other industries caused by the subsidy gap and the crowding - out of consumption in other areas this month, the price recovery in other areas next month still needs to be observed. From the perspective of corporate activities, the continuous profit compression pattern has led to a decline in the prosperity of small enterprises and employment, and the consumption demand contributed by the income side is still not optimistic [7] PPI Outlook - The supply - side dilemma of PPI has not changed. The "rush - to - export" effect of external demand is fading, and although the pull from domestic demand has slowed down, it may rebound in July, maintaining the current weak equilibrium. On the supply side, the over - capacity pattern is difficult to change in the short term, and the decline in international oil prices in July may lead to a decline in PPI prices. In terms of external demand, there are still challenges, and exports are likely to decline in the second half of the year, with trade cooling down, which is difficult to significantly drive up total demand. In terms of domestic demand, after the next batch of subsidy funds is in place in July, on the one hand, it will directly improve corporate profits, and on the other hand, the uneven pattern of CPI demand recovery may improve, and the chain of CPI pulling PPI will restart, and the PPI of consumer goods may continue to rise. However, overall, the upward repair amplitude may be relatively limited [8]