Export Performance - In Q1, export growth was 5.8% year-on-year, with March exports increasing by 12.4%, significantly exceeding the expected growth of 3.5%[1] - The strong export growth is attributed to a low base from the previous year and the delayed effects of Trump's tariff policies, leading to a "rush to export" phenomenon[1] - March exports showed a month-on-month growth that was higher than seasonal trends, indicating continued strength in exports[1] Regional Contributions - Major contributors to export growth include ASEAN, EU, and the US, with ASEAN's contribution rate rising significantly compared to last year[2] - In March, ASEAN contributed 2.2 percentage points to export growth, with a contribution rate of 17.7%, while the EU and the US contributed 1.5 and 1.2 percentage points, respectively[2] - Cumulatively in Q1, ASEAN, EU, and the US together contributed 0.9 percentage points to export growth, accounting for a total contribution rate of 46.4%[2] Product Categories - Labor-intensive products saw a decline in their contribution to export growth, while high-tech products maintained strong resilience[3] - In March, textile, clothing, and ceramic products showed improved export growth rates, but their overall contribution to export growth decreased significantly compared to last year[3] - High-tech products contributed 25% to export growth, while labor-intensive products contributed negatively, dragging down the overall export growth by 0.3 percentage points[3] Import Trends - Import growth was negatively impacted by low commodity prices, with Q1 imports declining by 7.1% year-on-year, below the annual target of 1.1%[4] - Agricultural products and certain resource commodities were the main contributors to the decline in import growth, with agricultural imports down by 15.8%[4] - The decline in imports was also driven by significant drops in metal resources and energy products, with iron ore imports down by 27.5%[4] Structural Changes and Risks - The fluctuating tariff policies are expected to create structural differentiation in exports, with potential short-term boosts in exports to ASEAN and certain consumer electronics due to tariff exemptions[5] - Domestic policy measures aimed at boosting internal demand may help offset external demand shocks, with expectations of potential interest rate cuts and increased issuance of government bonds[5] - Risks include unexpected changes in overseas policies and slower-than-expected recovery in foreign economies[6]

证券研究报告：宏观报告 发布时间：2025-04-16 研究所 分析师:袁野 SAC 登记编号:S1340523010002 Email:yuanye@cnpsec.com 研究助理:苑西恒 SAC 登记编号:S1340124020005 Email:yuanxiheng@cnpsec.com 近期研究报告 《出口可能出现的变化及应对》 - 2025.04.07 宏观研究 抢出口叠加低基数效应推升出口超预期 核心观点 以美元计价，3 月出口增速保持较高韧性，好于预期和季节性水 平；从国别来看，我国对东盟、欧盟、美国的出口保持韧性是支撑出 口超预期的主要原因。我们理解，虽然 2 月和 3 月美国对我国加征 20%关税落地，但市场基于美国"对等关税"的不确定性，短期仍存在 "抢出口"行为，同时叠加我国出口商品相对价格优势，支撑我国出 口韧性。 站在当前时点，向后看：（1）展望 4 月出口，因所谓的"对等关 税"已经落地，显著超市场预期，全球贸易体系面临重构风险，"抢出 口"或已结束，我国出口或面临较为显著压力，4 月我国出口增速或 回落至-3%左右。（2）年内看，出口有望实现正增长。一是关注美国是 否基于自身经济 ...

核心观 点 1 、一季度我国出口累计同比高达 5.8% （其中东盟拉动 1.4% ，拉美拉动 0.7%, 美国拉动 0.6% ） ， 基本与去年全年增速持平，显示我国出口在外部困难挑战增 多的情况下，韧性十足。近期，美国政府滥施关税，不可避免地对全球包括中美在内的贸易造成负面影响。后续对出口跟踪可能主要沿三条脉络 ： 1 ） "抢出 口"的变化。或可跟踪周频指标"我国监测港口集装箱吞吐量"， 4 月第二周环比有所回落。 2 ） 美国进口需求冲击。或可跟踪三个高频指标。目前最新至 4 月第一 周的数据或尚未看到快速回落迹象。 3 ） "新三大伙伴"的拉动。一季度新三大伙伴（俄罗斯、非洲、中西亚）拉动出口同比 1.1 个点。若后续维持，则或可部分 对冲其他地区受关税冲击的出口下滑。 2、进口方面，一季度美元计价累计同比-7%，受多个因素影响， 其中 国际大宗价格下跌，工作日减少等约可解释77%。 此外，我们提示关注"硬科技进口映 射"——自动数据处理设备及其零部件， 一季度进口同比高达83.7%，拉动1.7个百分点。 报告摘要 文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090 ...

以下文章来源于申万宏源宏观 ，作者赵伟 屠强等 申万宏源宏观 . 申万宏源证券研究所 | 宏观研究部 作者： 赵伟 申万宏源证券首席经济学家 屠强 资深高级宏观分析师 联系人： 屠强、浦聚颖、耿佩璇 摘要 事件： 4月14日，海关公布3月进出口数据，出口（美元计价）同比12.4%、预期3.5%、前值2.3%；进口 （美元计价）同比-4.3%、预期-4.3%、前值-8.4%。 展望4月，关税冲击落地以及春节错位扰动消退后，出口增速读数或有所回落。 4月13日的港口货运吞吐 量同比下滑10.6%，显示"对等关税"压力已显现。此外，春节错位对出口的支撑作用将在4月消散。然 而，仍需密切关注"抢出口"现象。一方面，豁免清单的不确定性依然存在。4月10日公布的消费电子豁免 清单虽在短期内缓解了关税压力，但该豁免措施具有临时性，未来两个月或将出台新的特定税率。另一 方面，特朗普政府对新兴经济体的关税暂停措施也仅为90天，同样存在不确定性。在上述两个因素的共 同作用下，短期内，企业的"抢出口"行为将进一步加剧。 常规跟踪：出口大幅回升，进口继续走弱 出口商品：消费品出口分化， 3月自动数据处理设备（-20.6pct至2.3 ...

2025年04月15日 二次抢出口正在孕育,但更陡峭下滑风险亦增 -- 国际贸易数据点评(2025.3) 团队成员 周欣然(S0210525040005) 投资要点: > 别除春节提前导致的3月偏强效应,3月出口同比约5.7%,显著低于抢出口 集中的2月。美国关税局部缓和但仍旨在隔离我国供给,我国出口仍然面临较大 不确定性。3月出口(美元计价,下同)同比12.4%,较2月反弹达15.4个百分点, 但主要原因是春节提前导致的3月偏强效应。由于春节提前至1月,节后复工和出 口恢复期集中于2月,从而令3月出口同比错位性暂时走强。甚于我们团队率先构 建的出口春节调整定量模型,剔除这一暂时性因素后,3月出口同比5.7%,转而 显著低于2月达7.8个百分点。这显示出特朗普前期分两次加码对华加征关税至 20%所引发的首轮"抢出口"效应已经有所衰减。3月进口同比-4.3%,较2月下滑 5.8个百分点,当月货物贸易顺差达 1026亿美元。4月以来,特朗普关税计划一方 面日益凸显对华针对性,另一方面亦暴露出产业链向美国回流的巨大成本掣肘。全 球产业链"极限拉扯"过程中,出口面临短期震荡、长期走弱的巨大不确定性。 > 本轮"抢出口 ...

宏 观 研 究 2025 年 04 月 15 日 二次抢出口正在孕育，但更陡峭下滑风险亦增 ——国际贸易数据点评（2025.3） 投资要点： 宏 观 点 评 剔除春节提前导致的 3 月偏强效应，3 月出口同比约 5.7%，显著低于抢出口 集中的 2 月。美国关税局部缓和但仍旨在隔离我国供给，我国出口仍然面临较大 不确定性。3 月出口（美元计价，下同）同比 12.4%，较 2 月反弹达 15.4 个百分点， 但主要原因是春节提前导致的 3 月偏强效应。由于春节提前至 1 月，节后复工和出 口恢复期集中于 2 月，从而令 3 月出口同比错位性暂时走强。基于我们团队率先构 建的出口春节调整定量模型，剔除这一暂时性因素后，3 月出口同比 5.7%，转而 显著低于 2 月达 7.8 个百分点。这显示出特朗普前期分两次加码对华加征关税至 20%所引发的首轮"抢出口"效应已经有所衰减。3 月进口同比-4.3%，较 2 月下滑 5.8 个百分点，当月货物贸易顺差达 1026 亿美元。4 月以来，特朗普关税计划一方 面日益凸显对华针对性，另一方面亦暴露出产业链向美国回流的巨大成本掣肘。全 球产业链"极限拉扯"过程中，出口面临短 ...

Core Viewpoint - China's exports in March recorded a year-on-year growth rate of 12.4%, significantly rebounding over 10 percentage points compared to January-February, indicating strong export performance [1][2][15] Export Performance - The increase in exports is primarily driven by a low base effect from the previous year, "export rush," and the early timing of the Spring Festival [1][2][15] - The quantity of exports has increased, while prices have exerted a drag on growth [4][11] - Exports to emerging markets have shown higher growth rates, with significant increases in machinery and mobile phones, while household appliances and labor-intensive goods have benefited from the export rush [1][6][9] Regional Analysis - Exports to Africa surged by 37.5%, Latin America by 23.3%, and countries along the Belt and Road by 15.1%, all exceeding 10 percentage points [6] - Exports to developed economies, such as the U.S. and EU, also increased but at a lower rate compared to emerging markets [6] Product Category Insights - Labor-intensive products, including footwear and textiles, saw significant increases in export growth, with footwear at 10%, clothing at 9.3%, and textiles at 16.5% [9] - In the machinery sector, exports of lighting devices increased by 24.3%, while general machinery and auto parts also saw growth exceeding 10 percentage points [9] Import Trends - China's imports in March recorded a year-on-year decline of 4.3%, but this was an improvement of over 4 percentage points compared to January-February [11] - Imports from major trading partners, except for the EU and the U.S., showed varying degrees of increase, with ASEAN seeing a notable rise of 10% [11][13] Trade Balance - The trade surplus in March was $102.64 billion, a decrease of $67.88 billion compared to January-February [15] - The overall export trend is expected to decline as the impact of tariffs becomes more pronounced, with potential for a bottoming out by mid-year [15]

Export Data Overview - In March 2025, China's exports increased by 12.4% year-on-year, significantly exceeding the expected 3.5% and reversing the previous month's decline of -3%[3] - Imports in March 2025 decreased by 4.3% year-on-year, aligning with expectations and contrasting with a 1.5% increase in the previous month[3] Factors Influencing Export Performance - The primary driver for the March export surge was seasonal effects, as early Spring and a low base from the previous year contributed to higher year-on-year figures[3] - "Rush exports" occurred ahead of tariff increases, with significant contributions from ASEAN, Latin America, and Africa, collectively boosting exports by 4.8 percentage points[3] Future Export Trends - Export growth is expected to decline in Q2 2025, potentially falling between -5% to -10% year-on-year due to the impact of tariff escalations and weakening external demand[4] - Recent logistics data indicates a significant drop in port cargo volumes, suggesting a slowdown in export activity[4] Potential Upside Factors - Signals of tariff exemptions may provide some relief, with an estimated $100 billion worth of products eligible for exemptions, potentially easing export pressures[5] - Continued "rush exports" and shifts in trade patterns towards ASEAN and other regions may sustain some export momentum[5] Risks and Policy Responses - The government is likely to implement policies aimed at mitigating employment risks due to external shocks, focusing on high-tech manufacturing sectors with significant export exposure to the U.S.[7] - If tariffs are enforced as planned, the direct impact on foreign trade revenues could exceed 1.2 trillion yuan for affected industries[7]

作者：张云杰 陶川 如我们在前期报告《 关税下出口：已知压力和未知风险 》中所指出的， 3 月还观察不到出口的下行压力，"早春"、低基数等因素将推高 当月出口同比。 但在关税升级后，后续出口将进入"新范式"。 如何看待出口的已知变化和未知风险？我们围绕以下四个问题展开回答： Q ： 3 月出口大超预期，源自哪些因素？ A ："季节性"脉冲是核心原因。 基于历史经验，春节时点靠前往往会压低 1-2 月出口、抬高 3 月出口表现（可参照 2006 、 2014 、 2017 年等春节时点与今年相近的年份， 3 月出口环比均为历史较高水平）。 今年不仅是"早春"，而且和去年形成"错位"（ 2024 年恰好是"晚 春"， 3 月出口环比较低），这些因素共同放大了 3 月出口同比读数。 从实际数据看， 3 月出口环比略高于"季节性"水平。 其次，"对等关税"落地前夕，出现了一部分"抢出口"需求。 这一因素可能解释了 3 月出口好于"季节性"的这部分。 一方面， 3 月外需是边际回落的，全球制造业 PMI 较上月下滑 0.3 个百分点至 50.3% 。 另一方面， 从国别上看，主要是对一些"转口"贸易区域的出口增速大幅反 ...

Economic Recovery - In January-February, the revenue of industrial enterprises increased by 2.8% year-on-year, up by 0.7 percentage points compared to the entire year of 2024[4] - The profits of industrial enterprises decreased by 0.3% year-on-year, but this is an improvement of 3 percentage points compared to the entire year of 2024[4] - The manufacturing PMI for March was 50.5, a rise of 0.3 percentage points from the previous month, marking a nearly one-year high[6] Trade and Tariff Impact - The ongoing increase in U.S. tariffs has extended the "export rush" effect, supporting inventory replenishment and order increases for enterprises[2] - The upcoming U.S. tariff investigation results are expected to significantly impact global trade order and suppress market risk appetite[11] - The U.S. economy continues to weaken, with the Markit manufacturing PMI dropping to 49.8 in March, indicating a contraction[18] Market Trends - The equity market has seen a shift in style, with technology stocks experiencing notable adjustments and a reduction in trading volume, indicating a convergence of market divergence[2] - Risk appetite in the market is declining, with gold prices expected to remain high due to geopolitical uncertainties and economic cooling in the U.S.[22] - The performance of dividend and consumer sectors has been relatively strong as investors seek opportunities outside of technology stocks[11]