【市场表现】 昨日期债延续窄幅震荡。短期看，一方面期债下跌的风险有限，当前仍处在逆周期政策周期中，资金面 持续收紧的可能性小，MLF增量续作也体现了央行对资金面的呵护，LPR与存款利率双调降，中期广谱 利率处于下行周期中；另一方面在关税压力缓释的背景下，当下央行进一步引导资金利率下行的概率也 不高，还需要观察政策后效和出口动向，目前整体或以稳为主，从期限利差的角度来看长债目前吸引力 也相对有限。短期信息空窗期，整体债市或进入震荡阶段，等待基本面指引。目前预计，短期10年期国 债利率可能在1.65%-1.7%区间波动，30年国债利率可能在1.85%-1.95%区间波动。单边策略上建议观望 为主，关注高频经济数据和资金面动态。 免责声明：本报告中的信息均来源于被广发期货有限公司认为可靠的已公开资料，但广发期货对这些信 息的准确性及完整性不作任何保证。在任何情况下，报告内容仅供参考，报告中的信息或所表达的意见 并不构成所述品种买卖的出价或询价，投资者据此投资，风险自担。本报告的最终所有权归报告的来源 机构所有，客户在接收到本报告后，应遵循报告来源机构对报告的版权规定，不得刊载或转发。 国债期货收盘涨跌不一，30年期 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Long - term credit bonds adjusted with interest rates, while short - term credit bond spreads significantly compressed. This week, affected by the easing of Sino - US trade tariff policies, market interest rates fluctuated upward. Credit bond trends were differentiated, with long - end yields adjusting with interest rates and medium - short - end yields falling. Credit spreads of various types of credit bonds compressed, with short - term varieties having a larger decline [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads declined. Spreads of urban investment bonds generally decreased this week, with different levels of decline for platforms of different external subject ratings and in different regions and administrative levels [2][9]. - Industrial bond spreads generally declined, and the spreads of mixed - ownership real estate bonds significantly compressed. Central and local state - owned real estate bond spreads decreased, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads dropped significantly, and private real - estate bond spreads slightly increased. Spreads of coal, chemical, and steel bonds also declined [2][19]. - Secondary and perpetual bond spreads were generally stable, and their overall performance was weaker than that of ordinary credit bonds. Most yields of secondary and perpetual bonds followed the interest rate upward, with only some weakly - qualified varieties slightly falling [2][29]. - Industrial perpetual excess spreads were basically flat, and urban investment perpetual excess spreads slightly declined [2][32]. Summary by Directory 1. Long - term credit bonds adjusted with interest rates, short - term credit bond spreads significantly compressed - Market interest rates fluctuated upward. 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y maturity China Development Bank bond yields increased by 3BP, 3BP, 6BP, 6BP, and 5BP respectively [2][5]. - Credit bond trends were differentiated. 1Y maturity credit bond yields of all grades decreased by 3 - 6BP, 3Y maturity yields decreased by 0 - 2BP, 5Y maturity yields increased by 1 - 2BP, and 7Y and 10Y maturity yields increased by 2 - 3BP [2][5]. - Credit spreads compressed. 1Y maturity credit bond spreads of all grades decreased by 6 - 9BP, 3Y, 5Y, and 7Y maturity spreads decreased by 3 - 5BP, and 10Y maturity spreads decreased by 2BP. Rating spreads and term spreads were differentiated [2][5]. 2. Urban investment bond spreads declined - Spreads of different rating platforms declined. AAA - rated platform credit spreads decreased by 7BP, while AA+ and AA - rated platform spreads decreased by 8BP [2][9]. - Regional spreads showed different declines. In different provinces, spreads of AAA - rated platforms mostly decreased by 6 - 8BP, AA+ - rated platforms mostly decreased by 7 - 9BP, and AA - rated platforms mostly decreased by 6 - 8BP. Different regions had different decline amplitudes [9][11][12]. - Spreads of different administrative levels declined. Provincial, municipal, and district - county - level platform credit spreads decreased by 7BP, 7BP, and 8BP respectively [2][15]. 3. Industrial bond spreads generally declined, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads significantly compressed - Real estate bond spreads varied. Central and local state - owned real estate bond spreads decreased by 6 - 7BP, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads decreased by 104BP, and private real - estate bond spreads increased by 4BP. Spreads of some real - estate companies like Longfor and Vanke also changed [2][19]. - Spreads of other industrial bonds declined. Spreads of coal, chemical, and steel bonds decreased, with coal and chemical bonds decreasing by 7BP and steel bonds decreasing by 8BP [2][19]. 4. Secondary and perpetual bond spreads were generally stable, overall performance was weaker than that of ordinary credit bonds - Yields and spreads of different terms and grades changed. 1Y maturity secondary capital bonds and AA+ and above perpetual bonds' yields increased by 2 - 3BP, with spreads decreasing by 0 - 1BP; AA - rated perpetual bond yields decreased by 1BP, with spreads decreasing by 4BP. Similar changes occurred in 3Y and 5Y maturity bonds [2][29]. 5. Industrial perpetual excess spreads were basically flat, urban investment perpetual excess spreads slightly declined - Industrial perpetual excess spreads were stable. The AAA3Y excess spread was 11.71BP, at the 20.54% quantile since 2015, and the AAA5Y excess spread was 9.22BP, at the 9.54% quantile [2][32]. - Urban investment perpetual excess spreads declined slightly. The AAA3Y urban investment perpetual bond excess spread decreased by 0.03BP to 7.25BP, at the 3.45% quantile; the AAA5Y excess spread decreased by 0.89BP to 10.56BP, at the 9.68% quantile [2][32]. 6. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - Market credit spreads and related excess spreads were calculated based on ChinaBond medium - short - term notes and perpetual bonds data, with historical quantiles starting from the beginning of 2015. Credit spreads of urban investment and industrial bonds were compiled and statistically analyzed by the R & D center of Cinda Securities, also with historical quantiles starting from 2015 [38]. - Calculation methods were provided for industrial and urban investment individual bond credit spreads, bank secondary capital bond/perpetual bond excess spreads, and industrial/urban investment perpetual bond excess spreads [38][39]. - Sample selection criteria were given, including selecting medium - term notes and public corporate bonds, excluding guaranteed and perpetual bonds, and removing bonds with remaining maturities below 0.5 years or above 5 years. Different rating types were used for different bond types [40].

双降之后，债市行情从短端开始修复，收益率曲线进入兑现阶段。长端调整幅 度较大，主要受协议签订后整体风险偏好显著修复的影响。从宏观角度看，债 市逻辑变化较大。4 月份外部冲击明显加强导致收益率下行约十个 BP 左右。5 月初降息落地后政策利率调降十个 BP，对长端定价有同等幅度的估值下行。然 而协议达成超预期，中间有三个月缓冲期，这期间可能出现强劲出口变化、国 内需求端边际强化及价格端变化，带来短期宏观趋势逻辑明显变化。 摘要 • 政策利率下调 10BP 后，长端利率面临不确定性，三个月缓冲期内出口、 需求和价格可能出现变化，导致长端利率近期或维持震荡调整，难以找到 明确主线。 • 期限利差压缩至 20BP 以下，表明长端行情变动可能性小，应关注短端修 复。降准及货币政策组合拳使得流动性乐观，资金价格中枢预计移至 1.4- 1.5 附近，或阶段性突破 1.4。 • 大规模结构性货币政策（如再贷款）超预期，央行或迎来中长期流动性投 放高峰，资金价格可能向下偏离政策利率，类似于 2020 年以来的超常规 宽松。 • 存款利率调降对银行流动性有影响，但受结构性货币政策支撑，当前流动 性略偏松。银行投放高峰期，新价格证 ...

Credit Spread Performance - In March, credit bond yields generally declined, with most credit spreads narrowing, particularly in the short to medium-term [1][3] - The 1-year and 3-year credit spreads mostly contracted, while the 5-year spreads showed mixed trends, with AAA-rated spreads generally narrowing and AA+ and AA-rated spreads fluctuating [1][3] - The overall trend for credit spreads across various types of bonds indicates a steepening yield curve, particularly for AA- rated bonds [8] Industry-Specific Credit Spread Analysis Industrial Bonds - In March, AAA-rated industrial bonds saw a general contraction in credit spreads, with the real estate sector experiencing the most significant narrowing of 23.88 basis points [10][11] - Private bonds in the pharmaceutical and biological sector saw spreads widen by 5.01 basis points, while other sectors experienced a contraction [10][11] Local Government Bonds - Credit spreads for local government bonds across major ratings and maturities declined in March, with most provinces showing a narrowing trend [1][3] - Notably, the credit spreads for local government bonds in Liaoning and Inner Mongolia contracted significantly, while lower-rated bonds in provinces like Qinghai and Heilongjiang widened [1][3] Financial Bonds - The credit spreads for bank perpetual bonds contracted overall, although there was a divergence in trends among different types, with secondary capital bonds widening [1][3] - Securities company subordinated bonds and insurance company capital replenishment bonds saw their credit spreads decline across the board [1][3] Historical Context and Current Trends - As of the end of March, credit spreads for various types of bonds remained at historically low levels, particularly for public industrial and local government bonds [8][9] - The historical percentile levels for credit spreads indicate that many financial bonds are above the 30th percentile, suggesting a relatively high risk perception compared to industrial and local government bonds [8][9]

Group 1: Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3238 points, with a daily increase of 0.45% but a decline of 4.19% over the past five days and 3.11% over the past month [1] - The Shenzhen Composite Index closed at 1882 points, with a daily increase of 0.72% but a decline of 9.86% over the past five days and 5.55% over the past month [1] - Large-cap indices showed a daily increase of 0.38%, while mid-cap and small-cap indices increased by 0.84% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating a mixed performance across market segments [1] Group 2: Industry Performance - Non-metallic materials sector saw a daily increase of 6.86%, with a 1-month increase of 5.53% and a 6-month increase of 18.56% [1] - The semiconductor sector increased by 5.03% daily but decreased by 7.88% over the past month, while other electronic sectors saw a daily increase of 4.59% but a 1-month decline of 15% [1] - The agriculture sector, particularly planting, experienced a significant decline of 7.37% daily, with a 1-month increase of 8.93% and a 6-month increase of 18.16% [1] Group 3: Trade and Tariff Analysis - The report discusses misconceptions regarding the impact of tariffs on exports, suggesting that the elasticity of tariff impacts is non-linear and may decrease at higher rates [9][12] - It highlights that trade partners like Canada and Mexico remain crucial trade channels, mitigating the impact of tariffs on U.S. exports [9] - The analysis indicates that the U.S. GDP could suffer a loss of up to 3% due to tariffs, with significant implications for consumer prices and inflation [12] Group 4: Company-Specific Insights - Jinbo Biological's new collagen filling product has received approval, potentially reshaping the industry landscape [17] - The company is expected to leverage its existing distribution channels to promote the new product, which is anticipated to significantly enhance its revenue [21] - The report emphasizes the growth potential in the aesthetic medicine market, with the domestic market size projected at approximately 150 billion yuan [21]

Group 1 - The report highlights that the Shanghai Stock Exchange has tightened the issuance of municipal investment bonds, making it more difficult for weaker quality issuers to finance [2][7][8] - The newly implemented guidelines include increased scrutiny on issuers with high proportions of inventory and receivables, as well as those with low EBITDA relative to interest expenses [12][8] - The special treasury bond injection into four major banks is expected to enhance their core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratios by approximately 1 percentage point, with the Agricultural Bank of China likely to receive additional support due to its lower capital adequacy [9][10] Group 2 - Credit bond yields have generally declined, with notable compressions in credit spreads across various sectors, particularly in the banking sector, which saw a reduction of 8 basis points [3][4][18] - The report indicates that the credit spreads for municipal investment bonds have also compressed, with no overdue non-standard municipal bonds reported in recent weeks [19][22] - The strategy outlook suggests focusing on short-duration opportunities as credit spreads may widen in the future due to lower supply of credit bonds compared to interest rate bonds [6][30]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided on the report industry investment rating Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - On April 2, Trump announced "reciprocal tariffs", setting a 10% minimum benchmark tariff for trading partners, with higher - tariff economies including China (34%), EU (20%), Vietnam (46%), India (26%), Japan (24%), etc., and also re - emphasized 25% auto tariffs and announced a 25% tariff on all imported beer, which increased capital market volatility [2] - On April 3, in the domestic bond market, the yields of various maturities declined, with the 10Y Treasury bonds 240011 and 250004 down about 5bp, and the decline of ultra - long bonds > long bonds > medium - short bonds [3] - After the "reciprocal tariffs" shock, the bond market is close to the pricing of unchanged short - term interest rate center + historical minimum term spread. The subsequent market decline needs to focus on the influx of risk - averse funds into the bond market and the opening of the broad - money window. The 10 - year Treasury bond is likely to fluctuate in the range of 1.70% - 1.80%. Active bonds are more cost - effective during the bond - replacement period, and some secondary - active bonds may over - adjust due to temporary tightening of funds [6] Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Impact of Tariff Announcement - Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" announcement was a major surprise to the market, targeting multiple economies and increasing capital market volatility [2] 2. Bond Market Performance on April 3 - The domestic bond market priced in the tariff impact in the morning, with the yields of 10Y Treasury bonds 240011 and 250004 dropping by about 5bp, and the decline pattern of different - maturity bonds was ultra - long bonds > long bonds > medium - short bonds [3] 3. Three Perspectives on the Subsequent Bond Market 3.1. Tariff's Impact on Fundamental Expectations and Term Spread - Tariffs increase pessimistic expectations about the economic fundamentals. When there are such expectations, term spreads like 10Y - 1Y and 30Y - 10Y usually compress. Given the current short - term interest rate above 1.5% (1.54% on April 2) and the 10Y - 1Y term spread compressed to 25bp, the short - term interest rate is approaching the theoretical lower limit of 1.74% (calculated based on the historical minimum term spread of 20bp) [3] 3.2. Conditions for Further Decline in Short - term Interest Rates - A further decline in short - term interest rates depends on broad - money policies, but the window may not open immediately. The pressure to stabilize the economy has increased, and the expectation of reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts has risen again. However, stabilizing the exchange rate restricts broad - money policies in the short term, the space for broad - money policies is limited compared to 2018, and the probability of broad - money policies in May - June to cooperate with government bond issuance is higher, while the net financing pressure in April is relatively small [4] 3.3. Focus on Institutional Behavior when the 10 - year Treasury Bond Fluctuates between 1.70% - 1.80% - In the current bond - replacement market, 240011 may face upward pressure because the short - selling force of 240011 is still strong (as shown by the increase in bond lending volume after the quarter), and 250004 is about to replace 240011 as the active bond, so its interest rate may rise due to liquidity pricing [5][6] - The secondary - active bonds of 30Y Treasury bonds may also face upward pressure. Although the funds have loosened, the negative Carry phenomenon still exists. During the Q2 when there is a 30Y Treasury bond issuance plan, the secondary - active bonds may over - adjust after the seasonal tightening of funds [6]