Group 1 - The Federal Reserve is facing a rare conflict between its dual mandate of achieving "full employment" and "price stability," a situation not seen since the stagflation of the 1970s [1] - There is a notable division within the Federal Reserve, with some officials advocating for a more aggressive stance while others support a more dovish approach [1] - The December dot plot indicates a split among Federal Reserve officials, with 7 members favoring no changes in 2026 and 8 members supporting at least two rate cuts [1] Group 2 - Some Federal Reserve officials expect inflation caused by tariffs to peak in the first quarter of next year before declining, while others are concerned about persistently high inflation [2] - Nomura forecasts that the U.S. economy will remain resilient in 2026, with real GDP expected to grow by 2.4% [2] - The unemployment rate is projected to decrease to 4.0% by the end of the year, supported by easing labor supply pressures and accelerated AI-driven business investments [2] - Despite anticipated relief from tariff-induced inflation, core services inflation is expected to keep the Federal Reserve cautious, leading to rate cuts in June and September 2026 [2]

Group 1: U.S. Inflation Challenges - The U.S. inflation rate reached 2.9% in August 2025, the highest since January of the same year, with a monthly increase of 0.4% in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) [3] - Food prices surged by 0.6% in a single month, marking the largest monthly increase in nearly three years, while oil prices rose by 1.9% [3] - 72% of the CPI components are experiencing price increases exceeding the Federal Reserve's 2% target, indicating a broadening inflationary trend [3] Group 2: Factors Driving U.S. Inflation - U.S. tariffs on key sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals have led to cost increases for manufacturers, with some experiencing a 2%-5% rise in costs due to tariffs [6] - The labor market is tightening, with immigration policies causing labor shortages in sectors like agriculture, leading to price increases for fresh produce [6] - Internal divisions within the Federal Reserve complicate responses to inflation, with differing views on maintaining high interest rates versus considering preventive rate cuts [6] Group 3: China's Deflationary Pressures - China's CPI growth has remained near zero since 2023, with the GDP deflator index negative for eight consecutive quarters, indicating persistent deflationary pressures [9] - Despite a 5% actual GDP growth, the negative GDP deflator suggests that economic growth is not reflected in nominal terms, leading to a cold perception among businesses and consumers [9] - The Producer Price Index (PPI) has experienced over 30 months of negative growth, contrasting with previous periods where PPI was negative but CPI was positive [9] Group 4: Structural Issues in China's Economy - Weak housing prices and income expectations are creating a negative feedback loop that suppresses consumption and home buying, further dragging down prices [12] - The monetary supply (M2) has increased by approximately 20% from October 2022 to December 2024, yet price indicators remain low, indicating a blockage in the monetary policy transmission mechanism [13] - The real estate market's downturn is causing credit contraction in the private sector, leading to reduced investment and fiscal stress for local governments [14] Group 5: Comparative Policy Responses - The Federal Reserve's focus is on controlling inflation without triggering a recession, constrained by political pressures and rising costs from tariffs [16] - China's policy approach is shifting towards repairing the internal economic cycle and expanding domestic demand, moving away from traditional investment-driven growth [17] - The contrasting economic conditions in the U.S. and China are leading to increased global financial market uncertainty and reshaping global trade dynamics [17]

美联储会议纪要提到，在讨论可能影响货币政策前景的风险管理因素时，与会者普遍认为，通胀上行风 险仍然较高，而就业下行风险也较高，且自2025年中期以来有所上升。大多数与会者指出，转向更为中 性的政策立场将有助于防止劳动力市场状况出现重大恶化。这些与会者中的许多人还认为，现有证据表 明，关税导致持续通胀压力的可能性有所降低。相比之下，一些与会者指出通胀上升风险可能根深蒂 固，并认为在通胀数据居高不下的情况下，进一步降低政策利率可能会被误解为政策制定者对2%的通 胀目标承诺有所减弱。 【黄金期货最新行情】 | 12月31日 | 收盘价（元/克） | 当日涨跌幅 | 成交量（手） | 持仓量（手） | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 沪金主力 | 977.56 | -0.85% | 284555 | 136303 | 打开APP，查看更多高清行情>> 【基本面消息】 数据显示，12月31日上海黄金现货价格报价976.99元/克，相较于期货主力价格（977.56元/克）贴水0.57 元/克。 美联储明年1月降息25个基点的概率为14.9%，维持利率不变的概率为85.1%。到明年3月累 ...

Group 1 - The USD/CAD exchange rate is fluctuating around the key level of 1.3700, currently reported at 1.3706, with a slight increase of 0.05% [1] - The USD index has risen slightly, reaching a one-week high of 98.3429, with a gain of 0.09% [3] - The Federal Reserve's December meeting minutes indicate a completed 25 basis point rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate target range to 3.50% to 3.75%, with a majority of officials supporting further rate cuts if inflation decreases as expected [3] Group 2 - The Canadian dollar is relatively stable, with market expectations that the Bank of Canada will not adjust interest rates in the short term, maintaining the current benchmark rate at 2.25% [3] - The Bank of Canada's recent meeting minutes reflect uncertainty regarding future rate adjustments due to U.S. trade policy and economic data fluctuations, leading to a decision to maintain current rates to stabilize inflation [3] - The technical analysis shows that the USD/CAD is in a high-level consolidation pattern, with the price oscillating around the 1.37 mark, indicating a balance of buying and selling forces [4] Group 3 - The current movement of the USD/CAD is influenced more by year-end market liquidity decline and position adjustments rather than significant changes in fundamentals [6] - The Federal Reserve retains the space for further rate cuts but is cautious in its approach, while the Bank of Canada maintains a wait-and-see attitude, resulting in limited divergence in monetary policies between the two countries [6] - The USD/CAD is likely to continue its oscillation within the range of 1.3650 to 1.3750 until macroeconomic data and central bank policy signals become clearer in the new year [6]

Group 1 - The current spot gold price has surpassed $4,350, trading around $4,331.00 per ounce, showing bullish momentum supported by the key level of $4,350, despite being below the 50-day EMA, which limits strong short-term rebounds [1] - The Federal Reserve's FOMC meeting minutes indicate that most officials believe further rate cuts are appropriate as long as inflation declines over time, although there is disagreement on timing and magnitude [1] - The CME Group has raised margin requirements for gold, silver, and other metals, requiring traders to provide more cash to prevent defaults on contract settlements [1] Group 2 - Traders are anticipating the release of the U.S. initial jobless claims report, with economists predicting a slight increase to 220,000 claims for the week ending December 27, up from 214,000 the previous week [2] - Technically, gold prices have shown strong upward movement this month but are experiencing a notable pullback at the month-end, indicating potential for a larger correction towards the $4,000-$3,900 range or lower [2] - The bullish outlook for precious metals remains intact, with prices above the 100-day EMA and an expanding Bollinger Band, suggesting upward momentum [2] Group 3 - Initial support for gold is seen in the $4,305-$4,300 range, representing the low from December 29 and a key psychological level, with stronger corrections potentially dragging prices down to the December 16 low of $4,271 [3]

对于发展中国家来说，GDP增长4.3%可能不算特别高，但对于像美国这样经济总量庞大、连2%的增长 都难以实现的国家而言，4.3%的增长简直可以称作奇迹。在特朗普执政期间，美国实现了这一经济奇 迹。他不拘泥于国际规则，也不强调自由贸易的高深理念，而是凭借极具现实主义的做法，推动了美国 经济发展。这种做法值得其他大国深思。 在特朗普看来，国际秩序、地缘政治平衡、多边主义等概念 显得遥远而抽象。他不懂，也不屑于讨论这些宏大的国际大道理。对他来说，最重要的是普通美国人的 生活：工作、温饱、养家糊口。他正是凭借对民意的精准把握，在2024年大选中再次赢得了中下层选 民、劳工阶层和焦虑中产阶级的支持。上任后，他以只争朝夕的态度，掀起一场针对庞大政府机构的瘦 身行动，大规模裁减公务员体系。在他看来，这是一种为承受沉重税负的美国人民减轻负担的措施。当 国内改革遇到外部竞争时，他又使用解放日关税等直接手段迫使贸易伙伴让步，甚至直接为美国财政带 来可观收入。特朗普的逻辑始终如一：世界规则可以暂时搁置，但民众的餐桌必须照顾好。 然而，繁荣数据的背后也潜藏风险。美联储关注的核心通胀指标——个人消费支出（PCE）价格指数在 上季度上升 ...

纪要显示，多数FOMC成员认为，如果通胀按预期回落，未来适度降息可能合适。然而，纪要未提供明 确时间表，也未超出现有政策框架释放新信息。内部意见存在分歧：部分官员倾向于在12月降息后维持 利率不变，以观察经济数据演变；另有成员提醒，高通胀风险依然存在，过快降息可能被市场解读为对 2%通胀目标承诺减弱，从而限制了市场对宽松节奏的预期。 UNforex 12月31日讯 随着年底假期临近，市场参与度下降，美国金融市场周二整体表现谨慎。美联储 最新公布的会议纪要释放有限鸽派信号，但缺乏新增政策方向，美股主要指数走势分化，道琼斯工业平 均指数在低成交量环境下小幅回落，美元则在纪要公布后稳中微升。 周二晚间，道指下跌约100点，仍守住48400点附近整数关口。标普500指数和纳斯达克指数基本持平， 板块轮动特征明显。能源板块小幅上涨，但医疗保健和金融板块承压，限制了整体指数的上行动能。 纪要指出，储备余额已降至「充足」水平，适时启动国债购买可协助利率管理，但属于技术性操作，不 意味着政策转向。整体来看，美联储立场更多向中性靠拢，而非开启新一轮快速宽松周期。 特朗普在与以色列总统会晤期间，再次批评即将卸任的美联储主席鲍威尔 ...

美联储12月货币政策会议纪要公布。 当地时间12月30日（周二），美国股市三大股指表现比较平淡，并均录得三连跌。 美联储披露的12月货币政策会议纪要显示内部的分歧明显，在该纪要发布后，交易员维持美联储2026年内两次降息押 注。 银行股全线走低，拖累指数表现，不过普遍跌幅不大。其中，高盛、花旗集团跌近1%，摩根大通、摩根士丹利、美国 银行、富国银行等微跌。 美股三大指数连续3个交易日下跌 当地时间12月30日（周二），美国股市三大股指小幅收跌，其中道琼斯工业指数跌0.2%，报48367.06点；标准普尔500 指数跌0.14%，报6896.24点；纳斯达克指数跌0.24%，报23419.08点。值得注意的是，上述三大股指均录得三连跌。 美股市场大型科技股涨跌互现。具体个股方面，特斯拉跌超1%，英伟达、苹果跌幅不足1%，Meta涨超1%，亚马逊、 微软、谷歌微涨。 能源股集体上涨，西方石油涨超2%，斯伦贝谢、康菲石油涨逾1%，埃克森美孚、雪佛龙涨幅不足1%。 芯片股涨跌不一，费城半导体指数跌0.13%。具体芯片个股方面，英特尔、迈威尔科技涨超1%，科天半导体、拉姆研 究、应用材料跌逾1%。其他芯片股方面，微芯科 ...

在成交量极度萎缩的背景下，美联储最新公布的12月会议纪要并未给市场带来方向，反而揭示了决策层内部巨大的意见裂痕。 由于缺乏新的利好驱动，加之流动性偏紧，周二标普500、纳指、道指连续三个交易日收跌，标普500指数跌幅0.14%；道指跌幅0.20%；纳指收跌幅 0.24%。 | Dow Jones | S&P 500 | Nasdaq | | --- | --- | --- | | 48,367.06 | 6,896.24 | 23,419.08 | | (-94.87) | (-9.50) | (-55.27) | | -0.20% @ | -0.14% C | -0.24% @ | 目前，市场核心逻辑正在发生以下结构性转变： 在科技股方面，Meta成为市场关注点。 Meta收购AI初创公司Manus。在科技股集体走弱的环境下，Meta通过收购Manus展示了其在AI代理领域的扩张野心。 美股投资网分析认为，此举旨在将高级AI能力整合进Facebook和Instagram。这种清晰的业务增长点，在震荡市中为科技板块提供了一定的情绪支撑。 从盘面反馈看，周一暴跌后的贵金属虽有短线反弹，但难以扭转整体谨慎的情绪。 ...

在12月10日举行的货币政策会议上，美联储公开市场委员会以9票赞成、3票反对的结果通过再度降息25 个基点的决定。其12名成员中，两人认为应保持基准利率不变，一人认为降息幅度应扩大至50个基点。 会议纪要显示，大多数与会官员认为，如果未来通胀如预期回落，进一步降息是合适的。但一些官员认 为，此次降息后，应在一段时间内维持利率不变，以让决策者评估最近货币政策对就业市场和经济活动 的延迟影响，并有更多时间建立对通胀向2%目标回落的信心。 新华社纽约12月30日电（记者刘亚南）美国联邦储备委员会12月30日公布的12月货币政策会议纪要显 示，美联储官员对此次会议降息决定并未达成一致，对未来货币政策预期也存在明显分歧。 多名与会官员认为，美联储为应对就业下行风险而放松货币政策的立场是正确的。也有不少官员指出， 通胀走高风险正变得根深蒂固，在此情况下进一步降息，将被误认为决策者对实现2%通胀目标的承诺 在降低。 根据会议纪要，所有与会官员均同意，目前没有预设的货币政策路径，未来政策应根据最新数据、经济 前景和整体风险状况进行调整。（完） 会议纪要还显示，与会官员的总体判断是，受美国政府加征关税影响，通胀上行风险依然较高 ...