今年4月以来，美国特朗普政府所谓"对等关税"政策搅动世界经贸体系，全球金融市场随之陷入剧烈波动中，美国本土市场首当其冲。 21世纪经济报道记者注意到，4月份，美国金融市场多次出现股债汇"三线齐跌"的现象。Wind数据显示，美股标普500指数当月下跌0.7625%，道琼斯工业指 数当月下跌3.1722%；美债则遭遇"抛长买短"，两年期美债收益率从月初的3.87%一度下降至3.6%，十年期美债收益率从月初的4.17%迅速拉升，最高达到 4.48%。 汇市方面，美元指数4月开盘104.179，收盘99.646，录得4.36%的跌幅，其间最低触达97.910。而在此之前，美元指数已长期维持在105以上的高位，且于今 年1月10日以109.6567创2023年以来的最高值。最新数据显示，截至记者发稿，美元指数徘徊在100.41附近。 中国社会科学院亚太与全球战略研究院副研究员肖宇在接受记者采访时指出，4月份美国金融市场股债汇三杀在其历史上屈指可数。"即使是在2008年次贷危 机期间，流动性短缺导致美三大股指大幅回撤，但债市和汇市涨跌互现，也未形成单边一致性下跌"。 显然，在美国掀起的关税风暴催化下，资本市场对美元资产信 ...

Summary of Key Points from Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion primarily revolves around the fixed income market, particularly focusing on the U.S. economy, monetary policy, and the bond market dynamics. Core Points and Arguments 1. **Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy** - Economic external demand pressures are evident, leading to a pessimistic market outlook on economic expectations, with a flattening yield curve observed. Attention is drawn to the U.S. Federal Reserve's policies, the dollar exchange rate, and the progress of fiscal expansion, while cautioning against the potential impacts of the U.S. "twin deficits" on dollar asset credit [1][5][7]. 2. **U.S. Economic Conditions** - The U.S. economy is currently in a state of stagflation rather than recession, with the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index declining primarily due to rising inflation expectations. Global trade growth is expected to peak in 2024, with increasing tensions in U.S.-China relations leading to a significant restructuring of the global trade economy [1][10][11]. 3. **Domestic Policy Focus** - Domestic policies are aimed at boosting internal demand, but negative overseas influences may weaken the effectiveness of these policies. Investment opportunities in real estate, infrastructure, and manufacturing are limited, while consumption is constrained by savings willingness, income expectations, and falling housing prices. Future policies should prioritize consumption promotion [1][13][14]. 4. **Monetary Policy Adjustments** - The monetary policy is characterized by maintaining stability in major tools while flexibly adjusting minor tools. A decline in real financing demand has led to spontaneous easing, with interest rates expected to decrease from May to August. The year is anticipated to be a period of declining interest rates nested within a macro-prudential framework, with caution advised regarding financial risks arising from this decline [1][15][16]. 5. **Bond Market Dynamics** - The convertible bond market remains strong with a clear bullish trend, supported by stock recovery enhancing valuation. Future performance will depend on equity market conditions, with smaller-cap convertible bonds showing more pronounced returns in a volatile market [4][20]. 6. **Credit Bond Market Performance** - The credit bond market showed weak performance in April, influenced by tariff policies leading to credit spread compression and subsequent adjustments. Higher coupon credit bonds present certain opportunities, particularly in mid-to-short-term strategies and municipal bonds [4][34]. 7. **U.S. Fiscal Policy and Deficits** - The U.S. has reached historical highs in fiscal expansion since 2020, with deficit rates significantly above pre-2019 levels. A shift towards fiscal tightening is anticipated in the coming years, with potential implications for the dollar's value [5][7]. 8. **Global Trade and Economic Growth Predictions** - Global trade is expected to peak in 2024, with a decline anticipated in 2025. The ongoing U.S.-China competition is likely to intensify, increasing the probability of a global economic restructuring [11]. 9. **Investment Opportunities in Specific Sectors** - Sectors such as public utilities and coal, which are less affected by tariff impacts and have stable fundamentals, are highlighted as worthy of attention. Additionally, the real estate industry in strong provinces and sectors supported by technology innovation policies may present potential investment opportunities [51][52]. 10. **Market Sentiment and Future Outlook** - The market sentiment towards dollar assets has weakened, particularly concerning U.S. debt repayment issues. While the immediate risk of default is low, the high debt rollover pressure and interest costs are significant concerns for decision-making [9][10]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - The discussion emphasizes the need for a macro-prudential perspective in evaluating the bond market, considering both external risks and domestic economic pressures. The potential for financial risks arising from interest rate declines is highlighted, necessitating careful monitoring of credit risk and liquidity conditions [17][18]. - The convertible bond market's performance is closely tied to equity market trends, with a focus on the impact of stock price movements on convertible bond valuations and investor strategies [20][21]. - The anticipated issuance of special bonds for debt resolution and the potential for significant municipal bond opportunities are noted, particularly in the context of land reserve special bonds [46][47]. This summary encapsulates the key insights and forecasts discussed in the conference call, providing a comprehensive overview of the current economic landscape and investment considerations.

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights China's firm stance against U.S. trade coercion, emphasizing that it will not accept any deals that sacrifice its interests and will respond resolutely to U.S. actions [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Trade Strategy - The U.S. has imposed punitive tariffs ranging from 34% to 104% on Chinese goods, viewing China as its primary competitor and aiming to weaken its position in global supply chains [1][3]. - The U.S. is facing a significant debt crisis, with national debt exceeding $36 trillion and annual interest payments nearing $1 trillion, leading to a reliance on tariffs as a means to address its economic challenges [3]. - The U.S. trade strategy has resulted in increased inflation and a growing trade deficit, countering its intended economic benefits [3]. Group 2: International Reactions - Key allies like the UK and Japan have openly rejected U.S. pressure to decouple from China, indicating a miscalculation of U.S. influence [3][5]. - The article notes that the U.S. is using trade as a political tool, which undermines international cooperation and trust [3][5]. Group 3: China's Response and Adaptation - China has made significant advancements in overcoming technology blockades, having developed 21 out of 35 key technologies previously restricted by the U.S. [5]. - China's trade focus is shifting towards emerging markets in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, with its exports to the U.S. decreasing from 19% in 2017 to 14.6% in 2024 [5]. - The article mentions that the U.S. tariffs on Southeast Asian countries have inadvertently strengthened China's ties with ASEAN nations [5]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The trade war has led to rising inflation in the U.S., with a reported 3.5% year-on-year increase in CPI as of March, and declining consumer confidence [7]. - The potential for retaliatory tariffs could lead to a significant contraction in global trade, reminiscent of the Great Depression [7]. - The intertwining of trade and national security by the U.S. is increasing geopolitical tensions, particularly in regions like Southeast Asia and Europe [7].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since 2021, the bond market yield has entered a downward cycle, influenced by the shift of monetary credit from supply - constraint to demand - constraint, the change of economic endogenous momentum, and insufficient effective demand [4][134][137] - The U.S. may shift from "loose fiscal + tight monetary" to "tight fiscal + tight monetary" during the debt - reduction process, and the Fed's rate - cut may require a significant weakening of the labor market [2][97] - China's current economic situation shows weak domestic demand and declining external demand. Policy elasticity may lie in the consumption sector, and monetary policy will gradually ease to cooperate with fiscal policy [3][131] - In Q2 2025, "macro - prudential" supervision may give way to loose trading, and the bond market curve may change from flat to bull - steep [4] 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 1月至今债市走势分析及其宏观逻辑 - **Monthly Trends** - In January 2025, to stabilize the exchange rate and the central bank suspended buying treasury bonds, resulting in tight funds, short - term bond corrections, and long - term bond fluctuations [1][51] - In February, tight funds spread to banks, weakening easing expectations, and both short - and long - term bonds accelerated their corrections [2][51] - In March, the funds returned to equilibrium. In the first half of the month, the bond market self - adjusted due to the revision of easing expectations, and in the second half, long - term bonds gradually recovered [51] - In April, due to increased external uncertainties, long - term bonds fell to a low level and then fluctuated narrowly [2] - **Interest Rate Curve** - From January to April 2025, the interest rate curve changed from "bear - flat" to "bear - steep" and then to "bull - flat." The flat curve reflected pessimistic expectations of liquidity and fundamentals, which cannot coexist for a long time [22] - **Credit Spreads** - In 2025, the credit spread of medium - term notes showed an obvious compression trend, while that of commercial bank secondary capital bonds fluctuated [27] - **Duration Strategy** - In February - March 2025, the duration strategy underperformed, but in April, the long - duration strategy became dominant again [31] - **Market Logic** - Fundamentally, the economy was booming in Q1 2025, but external changes disturbed expectations. In terms of funds, from January to February, tight funds led to bond market corrections; from March to April, the central bank's attitude became more favorable, and the bond market strengthened. Institutionally, in January - February, institutions reduced duration and leverage; in March - April, the long - duration strategy was preferred, and institutions bet on long - term bond capital gains [51] 3.2 "对等关税"背后的"特里芬难题"与潜在冲击 - **Triffin Dilemma** - The Triffin Dilemma refers to the coexistence of the global credit of the US dollar and long - term trade deficits. The long - term trade deficit may lead to the hollowing - out of the manufacturing industry and debt inflation in the US [54][56] - **First Impact of the Triffin Dilemma** - The Bretton Woods system basically collapsed in the 1970s due to the continuous expansion of US demand and the rapid shrinkage of US gold reserves [61] - **Consequences of the Triffin Dilemma** - The global credit of the US dollar may lead to a high - valued dollar, which is negative for US manufacturing exports. The critical point of the Triffin Dilemma is the continuous expansion of the deficit, which may trigger credit risks for reserve assets [65][70] - **"海湖庄园协议"** - The core of the "Mar - a - Lago Agreement" is to reduce debt and revitalize the industrial system through measures such as replacing foreign - held US bonds with ultra - long - term zero - coupon bonds and asking countries to cooperate in depressing the dollar exchange rate [71][75] - **US Fiscal - Monetary Policy Shift** - The US may shift from "loose fiscal + loose monetary" to "tight fiscal + loose monetary" to break the negative feedback loop of "fiscal expansion - increased interest payments - passive fiscal expansion" [79][84] - **US Economic Situation** - Currently, a US recession is not the baseline scenario. The US economy has not significantly slowed down, and the employment market remains resilient. However, if labor - market "hard data" weakens significantly, recession trading may resume [90][93] - **Potential Impact of "Reciprocal Tariffs"** - "Reciprocal tariffs" may lead to a decline in global trade volume and a decrease in the potential economic growth rate [94][96] 3.3 Policy Hedging and Domestic Demand Stimulation: Focus on One's Own Affairs - **Political Bureau Meeting** - The April 2025 Political Bureau Meeting mainly implemented established policies, with highlights possibly in structural monetary policy tools [100] - **Three - Horse Carriage** - **Investment**: Weak investment is due to the downward real - estate cycle, limited infrastructure investment space under local debt regulations, and insufficient effective demand restricting manufacturing expansion [3][110] - **Export**: The export structure is being improved. Non - US economies contribute significantly to export growth but with high volatility, and high - tech products are not the main support for exports [3][116] - **Consumption**: Constrained by weak income expectations and falling housing prices, consumption has room for improvement compared to developed economies, and top - level meetings have increased their emphasis on it [3][119][121] - **Monetary Policy** - With the issuance of special treasury bonds, monetary policy is gradually easing to cooperate with fiscal policy. In May, as a credit - off month, weak credit demand may lead to spontaneous easing [122][130] 3.4 Nested in the Macro - Prudential Interest Rate Downward Cycle - **Macro - background of the Interest Rate Downward Cycle** - Since 2021, the bond market yield has been in a downward cycle, driven by the shift of monetary credit from supply - constraint to demand - constraint, the change of economic endogenous momentum, and insufficient effective demand [4][134][137] - **Macro - Prudential Assessment** - The bond market is expanding, mainly driven by interest - rate bonds, and investors face more interest - rate risks. Current regulatory assessments focus more on credit expansion, lacking constraints on interest - rate and duration risks. Asset management product scale is increasing, and fixed - income asset allocation is strong. Banks and insurance institutions face the pressure of inverted liability costs and asset returns. Monetary easing is necessary but needs to balance internal and external factors and risks [4][142][155] - **Q2 Market Outlook** - In Q2, "macro - prudential" supervision may give way to loose trading. Monetary - fiscal cooperation may be prioritized to boost domestic demand and hedge external risks. The liquidity in Q2 is expected to be loose, and the bond - curve shape may change from flat to bull - steep [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the accelerated financialization of gold, highlighting its emerging role as a key asset in the global investment landscape amid a restructuring of the monetary order and increasing geopolitical risks [2][3][5]. Group 1: Financialization of Gold - The financialization of gold is driven by a shift in the global monetary order, with gold becoming a potential alternative to the dollar as a reserve asset [3][5]. - The World Gold Council reported a 1% year-on-year increase in global gold demand in Q1 2025, reaching 1,206 tons, the highest level for a first quarter since 2016 [3]. - China's gold reserves increased to 2,292.33 tons by the end of March 2025, with domestic gold ETF holdings rising by 327.73% year-on-year [3]. Group 2: Economic Logic Behind Rising Gold Prices - Gold prices surged to over $3,500 per ounce in April 2025, driven by a combination of geopolitical risks, U.S. debt concerns, and a significant increase in central bank gold purchases [5]. - Central banks have been purchasing over 1,000 tons of gold annually since the Russia-Ukraine conflict began in 2022, indicating a potential return of gold to a central role in the international monetary system [5]. Group 3: Three Pillars of Gold Financialization - The financialization of gold is supported by three main pillars: liquidity revolution, restructured pricing mechanisms, and functional transformation [8][10]. - The liquidity revolution involves the creation of financial products like gold ETFs and futures, which enhance trading speed and convenience [8]. - The pricing mechanism has shifted from physical supply-demand dynamics to algorithm-driven high-frequency trading, significantly impacting market liquidity [8]. Group 4: Structural Changes in the Gold Market - The Chinese gold market is experiencing a structural shift from physical dominance to financial dominance, with financial products outpacing physical gold transactions [10]. - The three-layer structure of gold includes physical, financial, and symbolic layers, with financial derivatives now dominating trading volumes [10]. Group 5: Gold as a Global Financial Asset - Gold's financialization allows it to transition from a static store of value to a dynamic asset in global financial infrastructure [11]. - As of April 2025, global gold ETF assets reached a record high of $345 billion, redefining gold as a new type of "borderless liquidity anchor" [11]. Group 6: Addressing the Triffin Dilemma - The financialization of gold may provide a solution to the Triffin dilemma by offering a non-sovereign international asset as a reserve alternative [12]. - The ongoing demand for gold from central banks is expected to persist, driven by geopolitical and currency risks, indicating a profound transformation in the global financial and trade systems [12][14].

Group 1 - The article discusses the challenges faced by the dollar system due to the spillover effects of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, the weaponization of the dollar, and significant changes in the global economic landscape [1][2][8] - The Milan Report proposes the "Mar-a-Lago Accord" as a strategy for the U.S. to reshape the global economic order through dollar depreciation, debt restructuring, and trade confrontation [2][4] - The dollar's status as the dominant reserve currency is linked to U.S. financial control, which is maintained through military alliances and economic strategies [3][6] Group 2 - The dollar's financial control manifests in three key areas: international pricing power, financial sanctions, and crisis transfer [4][5] - The U.S. has leveraged its financial control to impose sanctions, as seen in the Ukraine crisis, which has raised concerns about the safety of dollar assets and accelerated the process of "de-dollarization" [10][11] - The "Triffin Dilemma" poses a structural challenge to the dollar system, where the need for liquidity through U.S. deficits undermines the dollar's credibility [7][12] Group 3 - The article highlights the impact of the dollar's hegemony on global financial stability, emphasizing that the current U.S. policies may exacerbate internal contradictions within the dollar system [8][9] - The spillover effects of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy have led to global financial cycles, with significant repercussions for emerging markets [9] - The weaponization of the dollar has contributed to the fragmentation of the global financial system, prompting countries to seek alternative payment mechanisms [10][11] Group 4 - The article suggests that the U.S. strategy of "debt monetization" could undermine global financial stability, as proposed in the Milan Report [12][13] - The potential implementation of long-term zero-coupon bonds could lead to a loss of confidence in U.S. Treasury securities, impacting global markets [12][13] - The need for a diversified international monetary system is emphasized, with recommendations for enhancing the use of the renminbi in global trade [13][14] Group 5 - The article advocates for the construction of a new international monetary order based on the concept of a "community of shared future for mankind," promoting cooperation among countries [16] - It highlights the importance of regional financial cooperation and the establishment of a multilateral currency settlement system to reduce reliance on third-party currencies [16] - The development of a digital currency payment system is seen as a crucial step towards reforming the international payment system and enhancing the renminbi's role [15][16]

凤凰网财经 . 你好，我们是凤凰网财经，全球华人都在看的财经公众号，传播最有价值的财经报道，你值得关注！欢 迎访问：http://finance.ifeng.com/ 以下文章来源于凤凰网财经 ，作者凤凰网财经 作者： 凤凰网财经 来源： 凤凰网财经 特朗普或 创下 "尴尬"新纪录 。 据财联社报道， 自 1月20日特朗普重返白宫至4月25日，美元指数累计下跌近9% ， 料将 创下 1973年尼克松时代以来美国总统任期前100天的最大跌幅。这一表现与1973年 " 尼克松冲击 " 时期形成历史性呼应 ——彼时布雷顿森林体系崩溃引发全球抛售美元，而如今特朗普反复无常的 关税威胁、对美联储独立性的干预，以及对传统国际秩序根基的动摇，正重演"去美元化"浪潮。 数据显示，自尼克松第二任期开启至拜登执政前，美国总统任内前 100天美元平均回报率为 0.9%，而特朗普的政策已使美元成为全球资本的"弃儿"。欧元、瑞郎和日元兑美元汇率涨幅均 超8%，黄金价格同步攀升，蒙特利尔银行指出："美元作为储备货币的三大支柱——制度信任、 自由贸易和稳定外交政策正在瓦解。" 01 历史重现——布雷顿森林体系崩塌与美元"假死" 1971年 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current U.S. tariff war is an attempt to address the structural contradictions within the U.S. debt-dollar system, which is an evolution of the "Triffin Dilemma" [2][5] Summary by Sections U.S. Tariff War Reasons - The tariff war is initiated to tackle the unsustainable fiscal situation caused by trade deficits, aiming to resolve the inherent contradictions of the U.S. debt-dollar system [2] - The U.S. has imposed tariffs on various imports, including a 25% tariff on imported cars and a 30% tariff on goods valued under $800 [1] Tariff Calculation Issues - The U.S. tariff calculation method is flawed, using a formula that overestimates the necessary tariff rates by about double [3][4] - The formula's assumptions regarding price elasticity of demand and supply are inaccurate, leading to potential miscalculations in expected tariff impacts [3][4] Economic Impact of Tariffs - The tariff increases are expected to raise domestic prices, with an average cost increase of $2,700 per household and a potential rise in core inflation by 1.7% to 2.1% [7] - The tariff war is likely to reduce bilateral trade and weaken the dollar's status as a reserve currency, as evidenced by rising U.S. debt yields and a declining dollar index [5][7] Recommendations for Response - The company suggests increasing macroeconomic countermeasures, including fiscal and monetary policies to mitigate the impact of tariffs [9][10] - Emphasis on enhancing consumer income and building a robust domestic demand market is recommended to counteract the effects of the tariff war [10] - The company advocates for further innovation support to maintain a competitive edge in global supply chains, particularly in high-tech and emerging industries [11]

来源|凤凰网财经 特朗普或 创下 "尴尬"新纪录 。 据财联社报道， 自 1月20日特朗普重返白宫至4月25日，美元指数累计下跌近9% ， 料将 创下 1973年尼克松时代以来美国总统任期前100天的 最大跌幅。这一表现与1973年 " 尼克松冲击 " 时期形成历史性呼应 ——彼时布雷顿森林体系崩溃引发全球抛售美元，而如今特朗普反复无常的关 税威胁、对美联储独立性的干预，以及对传统国际秩序根基的动摇，正重演"去美元化"浪潮。 瑞银、德银接连下调美元预期，押注贸易谈判转机；对冲基金美元净空头头寸达 100亿美元，创2024年来新高；部分投资者预期汽车关税豁免等政 策回旋可能。市场博弈下是衰退信号，还是政策倒逼策略？ 数据显示，自尼克松第二任期开启至拜登执政前，美国总统任内前 100天美元平均回报率为0.9%，而特朗普的政策已使美元成为全球资本的"弃 儿"。欧元、瑞郎和日元兑美元汇率涨幅均超8%，黄金价格同步攀升，蒙特利尔银行指出："美元作为储备货币的三大支柱——制度信任、自由贸 易和稳定外交政策正在瓦解。" 01 历史重现——布雷顿森林体系崩塌与美元"假死" 1971年8月15日，尼克松宣布美元与黄金脱钩，这场 ...

长按即可参与 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： David_Pan 来源：雪球 雪球三分法是雪球基于"长期投资+资产配置"推出的基金配置理念，通过资产分散、市场分散、时机分散 这三大分散进行基金长期投资，从而实现投资收益来源多元化和风险分散化。 | 1本投资好书，0元包邮到家 | | --- | | 7天系统课程,搭建投资框架 | | 市场深度解析,投资机会早知道 | | 高手社群交流,扫平投资认知差 | 要知道 ， 市场公认各国央行增持是本轮黄金上涨的重要推手 ， 而其中最大的中国央行暂停增持 ， 无疑会对黄金的上涨逻辑形成重大打击 。 由于历史上中国央行每轮增持黄金 ， 无一例外均 出现了黄金的大涨 ， 因此市场中有一部分很聪明的资金是紧盯着中国央行做黄金 ， 央行买他就 买 ， 央行不买他就卖 ， 这部分资金可谓从无败绩 ， 我们为什么敢于去接盘呢 ？ 先回顾上一轮央行停止增持黄金的影响 。 央行上一轮自2022年11月开始增持黄金 ， 起初黄金 价格只是温和上涨 ， 但进入2024年后黄金突然加速上涨 ， 至6月初年内涨幅就高达到15% 。 ...