Core Viewpoint - The company expects its export volume this year to be comparable to last year's level, with ongoing projects in green smelting upgrades set to commence in the second half of 2025 [1] Export Performance - The company is currently processing export licenses for light rare earths normally, while the export licenses for medium and heavy rare earths have been submitted for approval [1] - Major export products include praseodymium-neodymium, lanthanum-cerium, gadolinium oxide, terbium oxide, and yttrium oxide, primarily exported to Japan, the United States, and Germany [1] - Export revenue constitutes a small proportion of the company's total income [1] Green Smelting Project - The green smelting upgrade and transformation project is the largest and most complete rare earth smelting and separation project globally [1] - The first phase of the project has entered full production, while the second phase is planned to start construction in the second half of 2025 [1]

Core Insights - China's rare earth imports have surpassed exports in recent years, driven by increased domestic demand for high-tech industries and strategic resource enhancement [1][2] - The U.S. heavily relies on China for rare earth elements, with approximately 70% of its imports coming from China, highlighting the need for the U.S. to diversify its supply sources [4][9] Import and Export Trends - In the first quarter of 2025, China imported 24,679.1 tons of rare earths worth 1.87 billion yuan, a decrease of 30.9% in quantity and 30.2% in value compared to the previous year [2] - During the same period, China exported 14,177.6 tons of rare earths valued at 920 million yuan, with a 5.1% increase in quantity but a 9.8% decrease in value year-on-year [2] U.S. Dependency and Strategic Moves - The U.S. is a major consumer of rare earths, particularly for defense applications, which account for 35% of its usage, significantly higher than the global average of 8% [9] - The U.S. government has initiated several measures to reduce reliance on Chinese rare earths, including contracts with companies like Lynas USA to establish domestic processing facilities [11] Government Actions and Policies - The U.S. Department of Defense signed a contract worth $120 million with Lynas in June 2022 to build a heavy rare earth separation facility in Texas, which was later increased to approximately $258 million [11] - The U.S. has also passed legislation to encourage domestic mining and processing of critical minerals, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign imports [11] International Cooperation and Future Outlook - The U.S. is exploring partnerships with other countries to develop rare earth projects, including discussions with Greenland for resource access [11] - The U.S. is considering regulatory changes to expedite deep-sea mining for critical minerals, reflecting a strategic shift towards enhancing domestic resource development [11]

Group 1 - The core index, the CN Materials Composite Index, reported at 3281.67 points, with a 2.51% increase over the past month, 1.68% over the past three months, and a 6.63% year-to-date increase [1] - The index is designed to reflect the overall performance of different industry securities from Chinese mainland enterprises, classified according to the China Securities Index industry classification standards [1] - The top ten holdings of the CN Materials Composite Index include Zijin Mining (6.39%), Wanhua Chemical (2.21%), and others, indicating a concentration in specific companies [1] Group 2 - The market distribution of the CN Materials Composite Index shows that the Shanghai Stock Exchange accounts for 49.23%, Shenzhen Stock Exchange for 42.38%, and Hong Kong Stock Exchange for 7.82% [2] - In terms of industry composition, non-ferrous metals represent 41.47%, chemicals 37.94%, and other sectors such as non-metallic materials and steel also contribute to the index [2] Group 3 - The index samples are adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December, and can also be adjusted under special circumstances [3] - Adjustments to the index samples occur when there are changes in industry classification due to special events or when companies are delisted [3]

证券研究报告|行业研究周报 [Table_Date] 2025 年 5 月 25 日 本周沪锡价格小幅下跌，Bisie 首批锡精矿已 进入物流环节 [Table_Title2] 有色-能源金属行业周报 [Table_Summary] 报告摘要: ►本周沪镍价格环比下跌，沪镍持续去库 截止到 5 月 23 日，LME 镍现货结算价报收 15,205.00 美 元/吨，较 5 月 16 日下跌 1.49%，LME 镍总库存为 198,636.00 吨，较 5 月 16 日增加 1.75%；沪镍报收 12.31 万元/吨，较 5 月 16 日下跌 1.25%，沪镍库存为 26,955.00 吨，较 5 月 16 日 减少 2.84%；截止到 5 月 16 日，硫酸镍报收 28,900.00 元/吨， 较 5 月 16 日价格持平。根据 SMM 周报，硫酸镍方面，需求 端表现方面，经过 5 月行业去库存后，部分前驱体生产企业 6 月排产计划趋于乐观，对硫酸镍的询价活跃度显著提升，且 企业对镍盐价格的接受度有所增强。供应端来看，部分镍盐生 产企业受需求增长及原料库存紧张影响，上调了产品报价系 数，另有部分企业报价维持稳 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article critiques Lynas Corporation's claims of being a leading non-Chinese rare earth separation company, highlighting that their technology and production capabilities are significantly inferior to China's, despite Western media hype [1][3][10]. Group 1: Technology and Production Capabilities - Lynas's production line in Malaysia is described as outdated, with claims of a "heavy rare earth breakthrough" being likened to cosmetic upgrades rather than genuine technological advancements [3]. - China's advanced "cascade extraction technology" allows for the precise separation of 17 rare earth elements, achieving purity levels down to five decimal places, while Lynas's solvent extraction method fails to reach 90% purity [3][10]. - The article asserts that Lynas's claimed "independent patents" are largely derived from knowledge acquired from a bankrupt Chinese company, undermining their innovation claims [3][10]. Group 2: Cost and Production Efficiency - The cost of producing one kilogram of dysprosium oxide at Lynas is $15, compared to just $4 for the same product from China, highlighting a significant cost disadvantage [5]. - Lynas's environmental measures account for 40% of their total investment, leading to higher operational costs, while China's automated production lines operate more efficiently and at lower costs [5][10]. - Lynas's annual production capacity of 1,500 tons is dwarfed by China's North Rare Earth Group, which can produce over 10,000 tons from a single facility [5][10]. Group 3: Western Supply Chain Challenges - The article discusses the flawed nature of Western efforts to establish a rare earth supply chain, citing the limited rare earth reserves in Saudi Arabia and the reliance on China for processing [8]. - Companies like MP Materials are criticized for exporting a significant portion of their mined materials back to China for processing, undermining the goal of reducing dependence on Chinese supply [8]. - European companies face similar challenges, with high labor costs making local recycling efforts unviable compared to purchasing new materials from China [8]. Group 4: China's Dominance and Future Outlook - China's control over the rare earth supply chain is attributed to its unique "in-situ leaching" technology, which allows for efficient extraction without extensive mining [10]. - The article emphasizes that China holds over 4,000 rare earth patents, creating a significant barrier for competitors like Lynas to catch up [10]. - The Pentagon's concerns about dwindling rare earth inventories and the inability to meet production demands for military applications underscore the urgency of the situation, with potential implications for future defense capabilities [12].

Core Viewpoint - China is accelerating the integration and control of rare earth exports to safeguard national security, prompting concerns from Western countries and even Russia and India, which are now collaborating to challenge China's dominance in the rare earth sector [1][5]. Group 1: Russia and India's Collaboration - Russia and India have reached an agreement to enhance technical cooperation in the field of rare earth and strategic metals, focusing on the development of processing and extraction technologies to ensure supply for their industries and reduce dependence on external sources [3]. - Despite having significant rare earth reserves (3.8 million tons for Russia and 6.9 million tons for India), both countries heavily rely on China for downstream processing technologies [5]. Group 2: China's Strategic Moves - China Rare Earth Group and China National New Group have signed a strategic agreement, indicating increased state capital involvement in the rare earth sector, which will provide strong financial and asset management support for future expansions [7]. - Chinese rare earth companies are accelerating overseas integration by acquiring Australian-listed rare earth company PEK and its associated Tanzanian and UK assets, marking a significant step in consolidating the rare earth supply chain [9]. - The Baotou Rare Earth Research Institute has announced the development of magnetic refrigeration technology in the rare earth field, indicating a surge in new technologies that strengthen China's patent monopoly in the international rare earth market [9]. Group 3: Challenges for Other Countries - While other countries seek to reduce reliance on China, the rare earth sector is characterized by long-term returns, making it difficult for latecomers to catch up as long as China maintains its competitive edge [11]. - There is a concern about internal security within China's rare earth sector, emphasizing the need for strict controls to prevent leaks that could undermine national interests [11].

投资者可于 2025 年 5 月 23 日（星期五）至 2025 年 5 月 29 日 （星期四）16:00 前登录上证路演中心网站首页，点击"提问预征集" 栏目或者通过中国北方稀土（集团）高科技股份有限公司（以下简称 公司）邮箱（cnrezqb@126.com）进行提问，公司将在说明会上对投 资者普遍关注的问题进行回答。 公司于 2025 年 4 月 30 日发布了 2025 年第一季度报告。为便于 广大投资者更全面深入了解公司 2025 年第一季度经营成果、财务状 况等信息，公司计划于 2025 年 5 月 30 日（星期五）上午 9:00～10:00 召开 2025 年第一季度业绩说明会，就投资者关心的问题进行交流。 证券代码：600111 证券简称：北方稀土 公告编号：2025-034 中国北方稀土（集团）高科技股份有限公司 关于召开2025 年第一季度业绩说明会的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 会议召开时间：2025 年 5 月 30 日（星期五）上午 9:00～10:00 ...

Core Insights - China is a major player in the rare earth industry, holding significant global market share, with a production of 270,000 tons in 2024, accounting for 69.2% of the total global output of 390,000 tons [1] - The government has implemented various policies at both national and local levels to support the development of the rare earth industry, focusing on resource protection and technological innovation [2][4] National Policy Summary - The Chinese government has issued multiple policies to guide the rare earth industry, emphasizing the importance of sustainable development and technological advancement [2] - Key policies include the "Rare Earth Management Regulations," which will take effect on October 1, 2024, aimed at enhancing resource protection and establishing a comprehensive management system for the entire industry chain [14] - The "14th Five-Year Plan" outlines goals for the rare earth industry, including promoting high-quality development and ensuring resource security [10][12] Local Policy Summary - Various provinces have introduced specific policies to enhance their rare earth industries, such as Sichuan's goal to establish itself as a major rare earth production base by 2027, targeting an industry scale exceeding 100 billion yuan [17] - Inner Mongolia aims to become a leading base for rare earth new materials and applications, focusing on technological innovation and sustainable practices [17] - Zhejiang's plan emphasizes the development of high-performance rare earth materials and their applications in various industries [19] Development Goals - The rare earth industry aims to achieve a self-sufficiency rate of over 80% by 2025, transitioning from a follower to a leader in the field of rare earth functional materials [10] - By 2035, the goal is to establish China as a global leader in rare earth materials, with significant advancements in innovation and competitiveness [10][12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent collective rise of gold-themed ETFs and related non-ferrous metal ETFs, highlighting the differences among three key indices: the China Securities Non-Ferrous Metals Index, the China Securities Sub-Industry Non-Ferrous Metals Theme Index, and the National Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Index [1]. Group 1: Differences Among Indices - **Constituent Stock Composition**: The China Securities Non-Ferrous Metals Index includes a broad range of listed companies involved in the mining, smelting, and processing of non-ferrous metals, with an average market capitalization of approximately 40.2 billion CNY [2]. The China Securities Sub-Industry Non-Ferrous Metals Theme Index focuses on larger, more liquid companies within specific sub-industries, with an average market capitalization of about 45.9 billion CNY [3]. The National Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Index selects 50 prominent securities based on industry classification standards, with an average market capitalization of around 46.7 billion CNY [4]. - **Industry Distribution**: The top five industries in the China Securities Non-Ferrous Metals Index are copper, gold, aluminum, rare earths, and lithium, with a relatively balanced distribution [6]. The China Securities Sub-Industry Non-Ferrous Metals Theme Index also lists the same top five industries, but copper's share exceeds 30% [8]. Similarly, the National Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Index has a comparable distribution, with copper also exceeding 30% [10]. - **Top Ten Weightings**: The cumulative weighting of the top ten stocks in the China Securities Non-Ferrous Metals Index is 45.91% [12]. In contrast, the China Securities Sub-Industry Non-Ferrous Metals Theme Index has a cumulative weighting of 51.22% [12], while the National Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Index stands at 52.1% [12]. Notably, the largest stock, Zijin Mining, has a weight of less than 11% in the China Securities Non-Ferrous Metals Index, but exceeds 16% in the other two indices [12]. Group 2: Similarities Among Indices - **Industry Focus**: All three indices concentrate on the non-ferrous metals sector, reflecting the performance of listed companies in this industry, closely tied to the overall development trends, market supply and demand, and price fluctuations of non-ferrous metals [18]. - **Constituent Stock Selection Rules**: Each index selects stocks from the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets (with the National Non-Ferrous Metals Industry Index also including the Beijing Stock Exchange) based on liquidity and market capitalization to ensure a representative sample of the industry [18]. - **Valuation Levels**: The valuation levels of the three indices are consistent, with all having a TTM price-to-earnings ratio below the historical 20th percentile, indicating a historically low valuation [18].

Group 1 - Six rare earth magnet companies, including Zhongke Sanhuan and Ningbo Yunsheng, have obtained export licenses as of mid-May [1] - The approval process for export licenses is ongoing for several listed companies, including Northern Rare Earth and Guangsheng Youse [1] - The first batch of export products from Tianhe Magnetic Materials will be delivered to a German automotive company, with subsequent orders requiring individual applications [1] Group 2 - The implementation of export controls on medium and heavy rare earths is leading to a strategic revaluation, with prices rising due to higher overseas premiums and increased demand for inventory replenishment [2] - The rare earth sector is expected to see a dual increase in performance and valuation, driven by new demand from humanoid robots and the low-altitude economy [2] - The rare earth industry is positioned as a globally leading sector in the context of de-globalization, which is likely to increase overall attention on the sector [2] Group 3 - Northern Rare Earth is focusing on high-end applications such as new energy vehicles and robotics, reinforcing its strategic value as part of China's "rare earth national team" [3] - Shenghe Resources is the only mixed-ownership listed company in China's rare earth industry that spans both light and heavy rare earths, transitioning towards becoming a global supplier of key green low-carbon raw materials [3]