Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Outperform" rating for the public utility and environmental sectors [1][10]. Core Views - The completion of the preliminary design for China's first 1 million kilowatt fourth-generation commercial fast reactor marks a significant advancement in the country's nuclear energy strategy [2][16]. - The public utility sector saw a 7.64% increase in the total market value of fund holdings, reaching 63.28 billion yuan in Q2 2025, with a focus on hydropower companies [3][17]. - The report emphasizes the importance of coal and electricity prices moving downward, which is expected to maintain reasonable profitability for thermal power companies [4][25]. Summary by Sections Market Review - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.69%, while the public utility index fell by 0.27% and the environmental index increased by 1.66% [1][15]. - Within the power sector, thermal power decreased by 0.29%, hydropower by 1.31%, while new energy generation rose by 1.24% [1][28]. Important Events - The preliminary design of the CFR1000 fast reactor has been completed, which is crucial for energy security and sustainable development in China [2][16]. - In August 2025, the electricity trading price in Jiangsu was 393.8 yuan per megawatt-hour, with a total transaction volume of 12.353 billion kilowatt-hours [2][16]. Investment Strategy - Recommendations include major thermal power companies like Huadian International and Shanghai Electric, as well as leading new energy firms such as Longyuan Power and Three Gorges Energy [4][25]. - The report suggests focusing on water and waste incineration sectors, which are entering a mature phase, and highlights investment opportunities in companies like China Everbright Environment and Zhongshan Public Utilities [4][26]. Fund Holdings - In Q2 2025, the total market value of fund holdings in the public utility sector was 63.28 billion yuan, with a notable increase in hydropower and gas sectors, while thermal power saw a decrease [3][19]. - The environmental sector's fund holdings totaled 7.352 billion yuan, showing a slight decrease from the previous quarter [21][23]. Key Company Predictions and Ratings - Huadian International, Longyuan Power, and China Nuclear Power are among the recommended companies with an "Outperform" rating [10][25]. - The report highlights the strong growth potential in the domestic waste oil recycling industry, recommending companies like Shanggou Environmental [4][26].

截至2025年7月28日 09:56，中证A500指数上涨0.25%，成分股光迅科技10cm涨停，兴森科技上涨9.29%，胜宏科技上涨8.36%，恒瑞医药上涨6.35%，金发科 技上涨5.98%。A500ETF嘉实(159351)红盘蓄势。 A500ETF嘉实紧密跟踪中证A500指数，中证A500指数从各行业选取市值较大、流动性较好的500只证券作为指数样本，以反映各行业最具代表性上市公司证 券的整体表现。 数据显示，截至2025年6月30日，中证A500指数前十大权重股分别为贵州茅台、宁德时代、中国平安、招商银行、兴业银行、长江电力、美的集团、紫金矿 业、比亚迪、东方财富，前十大权重股合计占比20.67%。 申万宏源证券指出，目前阶段，时间已经是牛市的朋友，因为时间是基本面改善和增量资金流入的朋友。反内卷显著提升了2026年中游制造供需格局改善的 可见度。远期有困境反转预期的情况下，2025年下半年经济验证承压可能只会带来短期波折。居民全面增配权益的条件仍有欠缺，但赚钱效应已加速累积。 A股全面增量博弈的时间可能提前。 华泰证券表示，当前交易性资金热度仍在、政策窗口期临近下，市场或仍偏强运行，底部升高，高位 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" outlook on the public utilities and environmental sectors, particularly in electricity and natural gas [1]. Core Insights - The report highlights a recovery in electricity consumption in June, driven by the tertiary sector and residential usage, with a total electricity consumption of 8,670 billion kWh, representing a year-on-year growth of 5.4% [15][17]. - Natural gas consumption showed a slight increase in June, with a total apparent consumption of 35.05 billion m³, up 1.4% year-on-year, indicating a recovery in industry sentiment [21][48]. - The report emphasizes the ongoing optimization of energy structure in China, with significant contributions from renewable energy sources, particularly solar and nuclear power [2][8]. Summary by Sections 1. Electricity: June Consumption Growth Accelerates - In June, the industrial electricity generation reached 7,963 billion kWh, a year-on-year increase of 1.7% [7][9]. - The breakdown of electricity generation types shows a decline in hydropower by 4.0%, while nuclear power grew by 10.3%, and solar power surged by 18.3% [9][15]. - The report notes that the second industry contributed significantly to the electricity increment, accounting for 38% of the total increase [16][17]. 2. Natural Gas: Global Price Decline and June Consumption Growth - The report states that the apparent consumption of natural gas in June was 35.05 billion m³, marking a 1.4% increase year-on-year [21][48]. - The average price of LNG in Northeast Asia decreased to $11.90/mmBtu, reflecting a broader trend of declining global gas prices [22][41]. - The report anticipates that the long-term outlook for natural gas will improve due to rising LNG export capacities from the US and the Middle East [48]. 3. Weekly Market Review - The public utilities and environmental sectors underperformed compared to the CSI 300 index, while the electrical equipment sector outperformed [50]. 4. Company and Industry Dynamics - The report mentions the increase in installed capacity for solar and wind energy, with solar capacity growing by 54.2% year-on-year [53]. - It highlights the ongoing construction of large seawater desalination projects in coastal provinces to support high water-consuming industries [53]. 5. Key Company Valuation Table - The report includes a valuation table for key companies in the public utilities and environmental sectors, indicating potential investment opportunities [60].

Core Viewpoint - A significant investment of approximately 1.2 trillion yuan in a super hydropower project has commenced, positively impacting the hydropower sector in China's A-share market [1] ESG Disclosure and Ratings - Among the 10 companies in the A-share hydropower industry, 7 have disclosed their 2024 ESG reports, resulting in a disclosure rate of 70% [1] - 90% of the companies in the hydropower sector are rated A (including A and A+), with only one company rated C [2] - Only 3 companies have disclosed Scope 1 and Scope 2 carbon emissions data, while none have reported Scope 3 emissions [2] Environmental and Social Dimensions - Protecting biodiversity is crucial for sustainable operations in hydropower companies, with measures like environmental impact assessments and ecological restoration being implemented [3] - Community relations and resettlement management are key social issues for hydropower companies, affecting their long-term reputation and sustainable development [3][4] - The "green" recognition of large hydropower projects must consider their full lifecycle carbon impacts and social effects to avoid creating new environmental and social liabilities [5] International Expansion and Challenges - Leading hydropower companies are achieving success in international markets, with projects in Peru and Myanmar enhancing their asset structures [5][6] - The global shift away from coal has created a strong demand for clean energy, making countries with quality water resources attractive for investment [6] - Offshore projects face complex risks, including compliance with local laws and potential impacts on local communities and ecosystems [6] Recommendations for ESG Improvement - Companies should focus on three main areas for ESG enhancement: environmental impact assessments related to biodiversity, strengthening supply chain ESG management, and improving corporate governance [6]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a rating of "Buy" for the industry [3]. Core Viewpoints - The report indicates a significant drop in new installations of solar and wind power in June, suggesting that the supply-side pressure is easing, and green electricity is expected to experience a reversal [2][10]. - The increase in the proportion of renewable energy is expected to stimulate the demand for flexible power generation, benefiting coal-fired power plants and aiding in the absorption of renewable energy [2]. - The report emphasizes the importance of focusing on the power sector, particularly coal-fired power companies with resilient quarterly performance and leading firms in flexible coal-fired power transformation [2]. Summary by Sections Industry Overview - As of June 30, the total installed power generation capacity in the country reached 3.65 billion kilowatts, a year-on-year increase of 18.7%. Solar power capacity was 1.1 billion kilowatts, up 54.2%, and wind power capacity was 570 million kilowatts, up 22.7% [7][13]. - In June, new installations of solar and wind power dropped significantly, with solar power adding 14.36 GW and wind power adding 5.11 GW, down 78.56% and 21.21% respectively from May [7][13]. - The average utilization hours of power generation equipment decreased by 162 hours year-on-year to 1504 hours [7][13]. Electricity Demand - In June, the total electricity consumption increased by 5.4%, with the first, second, and third industries, as well as residential electricity consumption, showing growth rates of 8.7%, 2.4%, 7.1%, and 4.9% respectively [7][10]. - The third industry's electricity demand showed resilience, with internet and related services growing by 27.4% year-on-year [7][10]. Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on coal-fired power companies such as Huaneng International, Huadian International, and Baoneng New Energy, as well as leading firms in flexible coal-fired power transformation like Qingda Environmental Protection [2]. - It also suggests prioritizing undervalued green electricity operators, particularly in the Hong Kong market, and companies with high stock project ratios and short-term revenue certainty [2]. Market Performance - The report notes that during the week of July 21-25, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 1.67%, while the electricity and public utilities sector index fell by 0.03%, underperforming the broader market [55][56].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods Model Name: Central Enterprise Innovation Index (000861.CSI) - **Model Construction Idea**: The index selects 100 representative listed companies under the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) based on their innovation and profitability to reflect the overall performance of innovative central enterprises[8] - **Model Construction Process**: - **Sample Space**: All listed companies under SASAC[9] - **Step 1**: Rank the securities in the sample space by average daily trading volume over the past year and exclude the bottom 20%[9] - **Step 2**: Select the remaining securities controlled by SASAC and its subsidiaries[9] - **Step 3**: Exclude securities with negative operating cash flow in the past year and negative net profit excluding non-recurring items in the past two years[9] - **Step 4**: Calculate the innovation score for non-financial companies based on R&D expenditure, R&D personnel ratio, patent quality score, and participation in national or industry standards. For financial companies, use revenue, net profit, patent quality score, and participation in standards[9] - **Step 5**: Rank the remaining securities by innovation score and select the top 50% as innovation-themed securities[9] - **Step 6**: Calculate the quality score for non-financial companies based on ROE, net profit growth, earnings quality, and financial leverage. For financial companies, use ROE and net profit growth. Combine the quality score with the scale score (based on market cap) to get a comprehensive score[9] - **Step 7**: Select the top 100 securities by comprehensive score as index samples[9] - **Adjustment**: The index samples are adjusted semi-annually[9] - **Model Evaluation**: The index is designed to reflect the performance of innovative central enterprises, with a focus on maintaining representativeness and accuracy through regular adjustments[8][9] Model Backtesting Results - **Central Enterprise Innovation Index**: - **Cumulative Return Since Inception**: 138.08%[5][10] - **Excess Return Over Major Indices**: - CSI 300: 79.25%[5] - SSE Composite Index: 83.67%[5] - CSI 500: 54.40%[5] - CSI 800: 74.09%[5] - **5-Year Cumulative Return**: 33.70%[10] - **Excess Return Over Major Indices in 5 Years**: - CSI 300: 49.24%[10] - SSE Composite Index: 29.47%[10] - CSI 800: 47.94%[10] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods Factor Name: Innovation Score - **Factor Construction Idea**: Evaluate the innovation capability of non-financial and financial companies based on specific indicators[9] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Non-Financial Companies**: - R&D expenditure to market cap ratio (40% weight) - R&D personnel ratio (10% weight) - Patent quality score (40% weight) - Participation in national or industry standards (10% weight)[9] - **Financial Companies**: - Revenue (40% weight) - Net profit (10% weight) - Patent quality score (40% weight) - Participation in national or industry standards (10% weight)[9] - **Calculation**: Sum the weighted scores to get the innovation score[9] Factor Name: Quality Score - **Factor Construction Idea**: Assess the financial quality of companies based on profitability and financial stability[9] - **Factor Construction Process**: - **Non-Financial Companies**: - ROE (30% weight) - Net profit growth (35% weight) - Earnings quality (25% weight) - Financial leverage (10% weight)[9] - **Financial Companies**: - ROE (50% weight) - Net profit growth (50% weight)[9] - **Calculation**: Sum the weighted scores to get the quality score[9] Factor Backtesting Results - **Innovation Score**: - **Top 50% Selection**: Used to identify innovation-themed securities[9] - **Quality Score**: - **Comprehensive Score Calculation**: Combined with scale score to select top 100 securities[9]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided regarding the report's industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q2 2025, A - shares and Hong Kong stocks showed different performances, with the overall market - value style in A - shares being dominant, and the bond market slightly recovered in June after fluctuations from April to May. REITs and convertible bond funds led the performance, and "fixed - income +" funds performed well driven by the equity market [4]. - Most fund managers expect the economy to continue a weak recovery in Q3 2025, with monetary policy remaining loose but limited room for interest - rate decline. Strategies focus on coupon income from medium - short - duration, medium - high - grade urban investment bonds and financial bonds, and the overall tone is prudent and flexible [40]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 固收型公募基金2025Q2季报数据解读 Performance - In Q2 2025, in the context of weak economic recovery, gradually restored equity sentiment, and intensified long - short game and fluctuations in the bond market, REITs and convertible bond funds led the performance, and "fixed - income +" funds performed well driven by the equity market. Pure - bond fund net values generally recovered [4]. - The top - performing funds in terms of Q2 2025 compounded unit net - value growth rate (%) were REITs funds (8.07%), convertible bond funds (3.49%), and QDII bond - type funds (1.38) [5]. Scale - By the end of Q2 2025, passive index - type bond funds received significant capital inflows and had the fastest scale growth [8]. Leverage - As of June 30, 2025, compared with March 31, 2025, the overall fund leverage showed an upward trend [11]. Duration - As of June 30, 2025, compared with March 31, 2025, the fitted durations of pure - bond funds all showed an upward trend [14]. Weighted Position Changes of Fixed - Income + Funds - By the end of Q2 2025, the convertible - bond positions of different types of fixed - income + funds were basically the same as in the previous quarter, while the stock positions all showed a downward trend [17]. - The top five industries for stock increase were non - bank finance, banking, communications, electronics, and medicine; the top five industries for stock reduction were food and beverage, automobiles, coal, basic chemicals, and home appliances [28]. Individual Stock Positions of Fixed - Income + Funds - The top ten stocks with the highest market value of holdings in Q2 2025 were Zijin Mining, Tencent Holdings, Yangtze Power, Contemporary Amperex Technology, China Merchants Bank, Midea Group, Kweichow Moutai, Alibaba - W, SF Holdings, and Haier Smart Home [30]. - The top ten stocks with the largest increase in market value of holdings in Q2 2025 were New H3C Technologies, Inphi Corporation, AVIC Shenyang Aircraft, Bank of Hangzhou, China Minsheng Bank, Yunnan Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhaojin Mining Industry, China Merchants Bank, Zhongjin Gold, and SF Holdings [32]. - The top ten stocks with the largest decrease in market value of holdings in Q2 2025 were Wuliangye, Midea Group, Kweichow Moutai, Wanhua Chemical, Zijin Mining, Honglu Steel Structure, Hunan Gold, BYD, Shunxin Agriculture, and Luzhou Laojiao [34]. 3.2 固收型重点基金2025Q2后市展望观点汇总 Key Short - Term Bond Fund Managers' Views - Most short - term bond fund managers expect the bond market to continue the volatile market with high winning probability but low odds, and the bond - market trend is mainly determined by the liability side and policy orientation [39]. - Strategies focus on coupon income from medium - short - duration, medium - high - grade urban investment bonds and financial bonds, and the overall tone is prudent and flexible [40]. Key Medium - and Long - Term Bond Fund Managers' Views - Most medium - and long - term bond fund managers expect the bond market to continue the volatile pattern, with loose monetary policy continuing to support the bond market, while domestic demand is weak and the real - estate market is weakening marginally [41]. - Some managers suggest actively participating in interest - rate bond band trading, while others believe that the space for credit - spread compression is limited. Most still focus on medium - high - grade credit bonds [41]. Equity - Linked Fixed - Income Fund Managers' Views - For stock assets, most managers are relatively optimistic about the medium - term market outlook. Low - equity - position fixed - income + fund managers are relatively conservative, while some medium - and high - equity - position managers will increase the exploration and allocation in industries with relatively guaranteed short - and medium - term supply - demand environments and reasonable valuations [42]. - For convertible - bond assets, the supply - demand balance in the convertible - bond market remains tight, with overall high valuations and potential increased volatility, but there are still structural opportunities. Some managers will maintain a neutral - to - low position and shift to equity - oriented and balanced varieties [42]. - For pure - bond assets, managers generally maintain a neutral view, expecting the central - bank policy to remain consistent, the capital market to remain loose, and limited upward space for interest rates [42]. Key High - Position Convertible - Bond Enhanced Fund Managers' Views - Managers will maintain a relatively positive position, seize structural opportunities, and pay attention to the layout opportunities in technology self - controllability and the allocation opportunities after the sentiment of new consumption and innovative drugs cools down [45]. - They believe that the convertible - bond market has a relatively high valuation, with short - term cost - effectiveness and fault - tolerance rate reduced, but there are still structural opportunities, especially in equity - oriented convertible bonds [45]. QDII Bond - Fund Managers' Views - The global market in Q2 2025 was still dominated by policy. The impact of Trump's tariff policy continued to push up inflation expectations, and there were differences in the market's pricing of the Fed's interest - rate cut [46]. - In the future, although the probability of a US recession is relatively low, attention should be paid to the recurrence of tariff policies, and the US bond market may fluctuate bidirectionally in the short term [46][47]. REITs Fund Managers' Views - In Q2 2025, the performance of different types of REITs varied. The performance of rental - protection REITs was stable, the industrial - park REITs were under pressure, the consumer - infrastructure REITs performed steadily, the transportation REITs showed growth driven by traffic flow, the warehousing - logistics REITs were under pressure in terms of revenue, and the energy and environmental - protection REITs showed different performances [50][51][52].

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Positive" (maintained) [4] Core Viewpoints - The report highlights a continued performance divergence within the power sector, with thermal power companies showing improved performance in regions like Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Guangdong, and Shanghai, while new energy companies exhibit significant individual performance differences [5][6] - Hydropower and nuclear power maintain stable performance, with hydropower's unique business model and resource scarcity being emphasized as key investment considerations [5] - The report suggests focusing on companies with resilient business models that can navigate annual cycles and have higher certainty with lower downside risks [5] Summary by Sections Performance Analysis - The report anticipates that thermal power companies will see improved performance in regions with smaller declines in electricity prices, particularly in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Central China [5] - New energy performance is expected to vary significantly based on regional wind conditions, electricity price declines, and installed capacity growth [5] - Hydropower's pricing impact is expected to be controllable in the short term, with a focus on low-valuation and growth-oriented companies [5] Investment Recommendations - The report provides three stock selection strategies: prioritize resilient hydropower assets, continue to monitor low-valuation or growth-oriented wind power operators, and focus on quality thermal power assets and power equipment manufacturers [5] - Key recommended companies include: 1. Quality Hydropower: Chuan Investment Energy, Yangtze Power, Huaneng Hydropower, State Power Investment [5] 2. Hong Kong Wind Power: Longyuan Power (H), Datang New Energy, CGN New Energy, New天绿色能源 [5] 3. Quality Thermal Power: China Resources Power, Anhui Energy, Sheneng Co., Guangzhou Development [5] 4. Traditional Power Equipment Manufacturers: Dongfang Electric [5]

Core Points - The Shanghai Composite Index decreased by 0.33%, while the Shanghai Central Enterprises 50 Index fell by 0.72%, closing at 1806.12 points with a trading volume of 93.634 billion yuan [1] - The Shanghai Central Enterprises 50 Index has increased by 2.24% over the past month, 6.69% over the past three months, and 2.24% year-to-date [1] - The index is composed of the top 50 listed companies controlled by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission and the Ministry of Finance, based on average market capitalization and trading volume over the past year [1] Index Composition - The top ten weighted companies in the Shanghai Central Enterprises 50 Index are: China Merchants Bank (11.04%), Yangtze Power (7.04%), CITIC Securities (5.83%), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (5.26%), Bank of Communications (4.15%), Agricultural Bank of China (3.94%), SMIC (3.63%), Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway (3.29%), China Shenhua Energy (2.55%), and China State Construction Engineering (2.42%) [1] - The index is fully represented by companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange [1] Industry Breakdown - The industry composition of the index includes: Finance (41.47%), Industry (22.86%), Public Utilities (10.67%), Energy (7.50%), Communication Services (6.37%), Information Technology (5.14%), Materials (3.42%), Consumer Discretionary (1.37%), and Real Estate (1.19%) [2] - The index samples are adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December [2] - New samples are prioritized for inclusion if they rank within the top 40, while existing samples ranked within the top 60 are generally retained [2]

Market Overview - The FTSE China A50 Index showed a predominantly declining trend with more stocks falling than rising, particularly in the banking, oil, and coal sectors [1][6]. Banking Sector - Everbright Bank had a market capitalization of 241.07 billion with a trading volume of 716 million, closing at 4.08, down by 1.21% [3]. - Major banks like China Ping An, China Pacific Insurance, and China Life Insurance had market capitalizations of 374.58 billion, 360.67 billion, and 1,057.65 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 1.962 billion, 789 million, and 2.959 billion [3]. Oil Sector - China Petroleum and China Sinopec had market capitalizations of 1,586.79 billion and 722.62 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 1.598 billion and 996 million, both showing slight declines [3]. Coal Sector - China Shenhua and Shaanxi Coal had market capitalizations of 763.55 billion and 201.27 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 1.049 billion and 905 million, both experiencing declines [3]. Semiconductor Sector - Northern Huachuang, Cambrian, and Haiguang Information had market capitalizations of 246.76 billion, 281.68 billion, and 328.87 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 5 billion, 2.105 billion, and 8.133 billion, showing positive trends for Cambrian and Haiguang [3]. Alcohol Industry - Kweichow Moutai, Shanxi Fenjiu, and Wuliangye had market capitalizations of 1,827.77 billion, 226.40 billion, and 479.53 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 6.140 billion, 1.609 billion, and 2.285 billion, all showing declines [3]. Electric Power Sector - Changjiang Electric Power had a market capitalization of 191.69 billion with a trading volume of 2.910 billion, showing a slight increase [4]. Securities Sector - CITIC Securities, Ningde Times, and Guotai Junan had market capitalizations of 440.17 billion, 361.23 billion, and 1,289.37 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 3.625 billion, 2.769 billion, and 3.803 billion, with CITIC Securities showing a decline [4]. Consumer Electronics - Industrial Fulian, Luxshare Precision, and Dongfang Fortune had market capitalizations of 569.17 billion, 277.97 billion, and 379.14 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 11.391 billion, 3.082 billion, and 3.138 billion, with mixed performance [4]. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sector - Heng Rui Pharmaceutical, Muyuan Foods, and SF Holding had market capitalizations of 265.38 billion, 242.76 billion, and 374.34 billion respectively, with trading volumes of 2.874 billion, 1.963 billion, and 1.074 billion, showing varied performance [4].