利差

Search documents
工业PPI承压,关注上游价格波动
Hua Tai Qi Huo· 2025-07-10 05:10
宏观日报 | 2025-07-10 工业PPI承压,关注上游价格波动 中观事件总览 生产行业:工业PPI持续承压。 1)国家统计局公布数据显示,2025年6月份,全国居民消费价格同比上涨0.1%。 其中,城市上涨0.1%,农村下降0.2%;食品价格下降0.3%,非食品价格上涨0.1%;消费品价格下降0.2%,服务价 格上涨0.5%。上半年,全国居民消费价格比上年同期下降0.1%。2025年6月份,全国工业生产者出厂价格同比下降 3.6%,环比下降0.4%;工业生产者购进价格同比下降4.3%,环比下降0.7%。 服务行业:关注就业政策工具推行。 1)日前,国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加大稳就业政策支持力度的通知》。 《通知》强调,各地各部门要强化稳就业政治责任,跟踪调度存量政策落实,不断完善稳就业的政策工具箱。强 化资金使用监管,统筹用好就业补助资金、失业保险基金等支持落实稳就业政策。加强就业影响评估,构建就业 友好型发展方式 数据来源:iFind,华泰期货研究院 行业总览 上游:1)能源:国际油价回升。2)化工:PTA价格回落。 中游:1)化工:PX开工率季节性小幅回落,处三年中位。 下游:1)地产:一、二线 ...
银行理财周度跟踪(2025.6.30-2025.7.6):跨季后资金面转松,银行理财产品收益回升-20250709
HWABAO SECURITIES· 2025-07-09 11:04
2025 年 07 月 09 日 证券研究报告 | 银行理财周报 跨季后资金面转松,银行理财产品收益回升 银行理财周度跟踪(2025.6.30-2025.7.6) 分析师:蔡梦苑 分析师登记编码:S0890521120001 电话:021-20321004 邮箱:caimengyuan@cnhbstock.com 分析师登记编码:S0890525040001 电话:021-20321070 邮箱:zhoujiahui@cnhbstock.com 021-20515355 收 益 承 压 — 银 行 理 财 周 度 跟 踪 (2025.6.23-2025.6.29)》2025-07-01 2、《债市期限分化,银行理财产品收益普 遍 回 落 — 银 行 理 财 周 度 跟 踪 (2025.6.16-2025.6.22)》2025-06-24 3、《资金面宽松,银行理财产品收益维持 回 升 — 银 行 理 财 周 度 跟 踪 (2025.6.9-2025.6.15)》2025-06-19 4、《央行或重启国债买入,银行理财产品 收 益 回 升 — 银 行 理 财 周 度 跟 踪 (2025.6.2-2025.6.8 ...
【银行理财】跨季后资金面转松,银行理财产品收益回升——银行理财周度跟踪(2025.6.30-2025.7.6)
华宝财富魔方· 2025-07-09 09:21
分析师:蔡梦苑 登记编号:S0890521120001 分析师:周佳卉 登记编号:S0890525040001 投资要点 监管和行业动态: 1、中国证券报记者6月30日获悉,国家外汇管理局日前已向部分符合条件的 合格境内机构投资者(QDII)发放投资额度合计30.8亿美元。2、普益标准数据显示,截至6月 末,银行理财市场存续规模31.22万亿元,较年初增加5.22%。在季末回表压力与估值整改"半年 考"的双重考验下,当前净值型理财存续规模坚守31万亿关口,较5月规模变化不大。 同业创新动态: 招银理财创新费率模式,推出浮动管理费理财产品。工银理财参与IFBH港股 IPO基石投资,继三花智控后再下一城。交银理财首款慈善理财产品成功实现捐赠。建信理财成 功战略投资今年首单购物中心公募REITs 。 收益率表现: 上 周 ( 2025/6/30-2025/7/6 , 下 同 ) 现 金 管 理 类 产 品 近 7 日 年 化 收 益 率 录 得 1.48%,环比上行5BP;同期货币型基金近7日年化收益率报1.27%,环比下行5BP。现金管理类 产品与货币基金的收益差环比上行10BP。上周各期限纯固收和固收+产品年化 ...
和美股一样,垃圾债市场也对美国经济“很乐观”
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-07-09 03:33
在美国经济前景的不确定性中,垃圾债券(即高收益企业债券)市场正传递出与美股同样的乐观信号。 最新数据显示,美国垃圾债与国债的利差已降至历史低点,目前约为2.88个百分点,为2021年以来的最 低水平,仅略高于今年1月的低点,表明投资者对经济前景的信心依然坚挺。 低利差通常意味着投资者并不预期经济会陷入衰退,即便特朗普政府近期推行的关税政策引发了市场波 动。 Nicholas Colas在周二的一份报告中指出,2021年时,由于疫情时期财政和货币政策的强力支持,美国 经济信心非常高,而当前利差的收窄反映了类似的情绪。 垃圾债市场在2025年上半年的强劲表现进一步佐证了这一乐观态度。 据FactSet数据,iShares iBoxx美元高收益企业债券ETF上半年总回报率达5%,SPDR彭博高收益债券 ETF(JNK)同期获得4.8%的总回报,后者在6月的单月回报率更是高达2%,创下自2024年7月以来的最佳 月度表现。 先锋集团高收益信用负责人兼高级投资组合经理Michael Chang表示,6月份是高收益债券的"绝佳月 份"。 Chang在接受媒体采访时表示,关税的最终影响不会成为触发美国经济衰退的导火索。他指 ...
2220亿险资入市,大象起舞,蚂蚁寻缝
Hu Xiu· 2025-07-09 00:43
出品 | 妙投APP 作者 | 张贝贝 头图 | AI生图 在利率下行、传统险的利差损风险加大情况下,2220亿保险资金通过长期股票投资试点方式加速涌入资本市场寻求破局(以下简称"险企长线资金入市")。 注:保险资金长期投资改革试点,指保险公司出资设立私募证券投资基金,主要投向二级市场股票,并长期持有。目前监管部门已批准三批试点,中国人寿 和新华保险作为首批试点机构,规模合计500亿元;第二批获批试点的保险公司有8家,规模合计1120亿元;第三批600亿元的保险资金长期投资试点的机构 正在陆续获批,三批总规模预计达到2220亿元。 随着险企长线资金增加并加速入市,险企投资端的权益类资产可能会增加,而受到利率下行扰动较大的国债、银行存款等资产占比降低,有望带来投资回报 率的提升。 同时,险企权益投资收益率提升后,险企更敢推广浮动收益产品,并可能反向驱动负债端保险产品创新与销售增长,带来业绩走强。 然而分析下来,险企长线资金的加速入市对于保险行业的影响并不是"普惠利好",反而可能成为加速行业分化的"催化剂"。 详见下文。 利差损危机下的"自救" 随着利率不断下行,保险公司传统险的利差损压力较大(即资产收益无法覆盖 ...
美国垃圾债市场释放乐观信号 投资者对经济前景信心不减
智通财经网· 2025-07-08 22:20
尽管近期关税相关的不确定性引发市场波动,美国垃圾债市场却发出乐观的经济信号。 智通财经APP获悉,DataTrek Research联合创始人Nicholas Colas在周二的一份研究报告中指出:"这个对 风险高度敏感的市场,和股市一样,对美国经济抱有乐观预期。" 垃圾债券(高收益企业债)因其在经济下行时期违约风险高而备受关注。投资者之所以愿意购买此类债券, 是因为它们通常提供比美国国债更高的收益率,以补偿风险。目前,这种"利差"虽然已处于历史低位,引 发部分估值过高的担忧,但也从侧面反映出市场并不预期美国经济会陷入衰退,即便面临特朗普政府新一 轮关税政策。 根据道琼斯市场数据,标普500指数在2025年7月3日收于历史新高,已是今年第七次创纪录高点。尽管周 二小幅回落0.1%,但仍距历史高点不足1%。 Vanguard高收益债负责人及资深投资经理Michael Chang则表示,从宏观角度看,关税对美国经济而言"确 实有影响,但仍属可控范围"。他指出:"我们认为,当前的关税局面不太可能成为美国经济陷入衰退的导 火索。" 当然,如果市场开始担忧关税升级可能引发经济下行,垃圾债利差可能扩大,从而影响该市场的回 ...
江苏恒尚节能科技股份有限公司2024年年度权益分派实施公告
Shang Hai Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-07-08 18:54
证券代码:603137 证券简称:恒尚节能 公告编号:2025-022 江苏恒尚节能科技股份有限公司 2024年年度权益分派实施公告 2.分派对象: 截至股权登记日下午上海证券交易所收市后,在中国证券登记结算有限责任公司上海分公司(以下简 称"中国结算上海分公司")登记在册的本公司全体股东。 3.分配方案: 本次利润分配以方案实施前的公司总股本182,933,334股为基数,每股派发现金红利0.08元(含税),共 计派发现金红利14,634,666.72元。 1.实施办法 无限售条件流通股的红利委托中国结算上海分公司通过其资金清算系统向股权登记日上海证券交易所收 市后登记在册并在上海证券交易所各会员办理了指定交易的股东派发。已办理指定交易的投资者可于红 利发放日在其指定的证券营业部领取现金红利,未办理指定交易的股东红利暂由中国结算上海分公司保 管,待办理指定交易后再进行派发。 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏,并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示: ● 每股分配比例 A股每股现金红利0.08元 本次利润分配方案经公司2025年5月16日 ...
华谊集团: 2024年年度权益分派实施公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-08 16:08
Core Points - The company announced a cash dividend distribution for A and B shareholders, with A shares receiving a cash dividend of 0.18 RMB per share and B shares receiving 0.025046 USD per share [1] - The dividend distribution plan was approved at the annual shareholders' meeting held on May 30, 2025 [1] Dividend Distribution Details - A shares will have a record date of July 14, 2025, with the ex-dividend date on July 15, 2025, and payment on the same day [1] - B shares will have a record date of July 17, 2025, the last trading day on July 14, 2025, and payment on July 24, 2025 [1] - The total cash dividend to be distributed amounts to 382,109,630.40 RMB based on a total share capital of 2,122,831,280 shares [1] Taxation Policies - For A share individual shareholders, dividends are subject to different tax treatments based on holding periods, with a 10% tax for shares held for one month or less, and no tax for shares held for over one year [2][3] - For B share non-resident corporate shareholders, a 10% withholding tax will apply, resulting in a net dividend of 0.022541 USD per share [5] - For B share resident individual shareholders, the tax treatment varies based on holding periods, with a maximum tax of 20% for shares held for one month or less, and a net dividend of 0.025046 USD per share [5][6]
中枢1.9%的焦虑
SINOLINK SECURITIES· 2025-07-08 15:25
Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content found Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - As of July 7, 2025, the valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise real estate bonds and industrial bonds in the outstanding credit bonds are generally higher than those of other varieties. Compared with last week, the yields of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds and real estate bonds have generally declined, and the short - end varieties of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds have a larger decline. Among them, the 1 - 2 - year public and 1 - year private non - perpetual bonds of private enterprises have declined by 19.6BP and 14.2BP respectively. The 2 - year private enterprise real estate bonds are more popular [3][8]. - In financial bonds, the varieties with high valuation yields and spreads include urban and rural commercial bank capital supplementary tools and leasing company bonds. Compared with last week, the yields of financial bonds have generally declined. For example, the yields of 3 - 5 - year non - perpetual leasing bonds have declined by more than 8.5BP, and the yields of 1 - year joint - stock bank secondary perpetual bonds have declined by nearly 13BP [4][8]. - In public offering urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are both below 2.3%. The urban investment bonds with yields exceeding 4.5% are in prefecture - level cities and districts and counties of Guizhou. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu and other regions are also relatively high. Compared with last week, the yields of public offering urban investment bonds have basically declined, and the average yield of varieties within 1 year has declined by 11.5BP [2][16]. - In private placement urban investment bonds, the weighted average valuation yields of coastal provinces such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian are below 2.7%. The varieties with yields higher than 4% appear in prefecture - level cities of Guizhou and Shaanxi. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu, Heilongjiang and other regions are also relatively high. Compared with last week, the yields of private placement urban investment bonds have mainly declined [2]. Group 3: Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 1. Overall Outstanding Credit Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields and spreads of private enterprise real estate bonds and industrial bonds are generally higher than those of other varieties. The yields of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds and real estate bonds have generally declined, and the short - end varieties of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds have a larger decline. The yields of financial bonds have also generally declined [3][4][8]. - The data in the table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads, and their changes compared with last week of different types of bonds (including urban investment bonds, non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds, real estate bonds, financial bonds, etc.) under different issuance methods (public offering and private placement) and different maturities [9][12][13]. 2. Public Offering Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces are below 2.3%, while those in Guizhou's prefecture - level cities and districts and counties exceed 4.5%. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu and other regions are relatively high. The yields have basically declined compared with last week, and the 1 - year varieties have an average decline of 11.5BP. The varieties with a large decline in yields include 1 - year non - perpetual bonds of Jiangsu provincial level, 1 - year perpetual bonds of Hebei provincial level, etc. [2][16]. - The table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads, and their changes compared with last week of public offering urban investment bonds at different administrative levels in various regions [17][19][21]. 3. Private Placement Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of coastal provinces such as Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Fujian are below 2.7%. The varieties with yields higher than 4% appear in prefecture - level cities of Guizhou and Shaanxi. The spreads in Yunnan, Gansu, Heilongjiang and other regions are relatively high. The yields have mainly declined compared with last week, and the varieties with a large decline in yields include 1 - year perpetual bonds of Shandong district and county level, etc. [2]. - The table shows the weighted average valuation yields, spreads of private placement urban investment bonds at different administrative levels in various regions [25][28].
信用债周报:收益率下行,评级利差普遍处于历史低位-20250708
BOHAI SECURITIES· 2025-07-08 10:57
固定收益周报 收益率下行,评级利差普遍处于历史低位 ――信用债周报 分析师:李济安 SAC NO:S1150522060001 2025 年 7 月 8 日 核心观点: 本期(6 月 30 日至 7 月 6 日)交易商协会公布的发行指导利率多数下行, 整体变化幅度为-14 BP 至 2 BP。本期信用债发行规模环比下降,其中,企业 债、短期融资券发行金额增加,公司债、中期票据、定向工具发行金额减少; 信用债净融资额环比增加,中期票据净融资额减少,其余品种净融资额增加, 企业债、定向工具净融资额为负,公司债、中期票据、短期融资券净融资额 为正。二级市场方面,本期信用债成交金额环比下降,短期融资券成交金额 增加,其余品种成交金额均减少。收益率方面,本期信用债收益率全部下行。 信用利差方面,中短期票据、企业债、城投债信用利差多数收窄。分位数来 看,各等级基本处于历史低位,配置性价比不高,部分 AAA 级 5 年期品种 信用利差处于 10%左右分位,仍有少量压缩空间。绝对收益角度来看,供给 不足和相对旺盛的配置需求对信用债走强形成持续支撑,尽管多空因素影响 下震荡调整难以避免,但长远来看未来收益率仍在下行通道,鉴于当 ...