Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Positive" [2] Core Viewpoints - The report highlights significant growth in wind power installations, with a 134.2% year-on-year increase in new installations from January to May 2025, totaling 46.28 GW [20] - The report emphasizes the potential recovery in profitability for the electric vehicle battery sector, driven by a decrease in lithium carbonate prices and advancements in fast-charging technology [2][3] - The energy storage sector is expected to maintain high growth, with commercial storage opportunities emerging through virtual power plants and increased demand for household storage as summer approaches [3] - The photovoltaic sector is experiencing strong demand in Europe and domestic ground power stations, with new technologies like TOPCON and HJT accelerating production [3][18] Summary by Sections New Energy Vehicles - The lithium battery sector is anticipated to recover, with a potential turning point in supply excess and a decrease in lithium carbonate prices stimulating downstream demand [2] - In May 2025, new energy vehicle sales reached 1.307 million units, a year-on-year increase of 36.9% [14] - The installed capacity of power batteries in May 2025 was 57.1 GWh, up 61.3% year-on-year [15] Power Equipment and Energy Storage - The report suggests that 2025 is likely to be a significant year for grid investment, with increasing demand for power equipment driven by new industries and the need for grid upgrades due to renewable energy development [2][3] - The energy storage market is expected to thrive, with large-scale storage and commercial storage gaining traction [3] Photovoltaics - The report notes that the photovoltaic industry is benefiting from high demand in Europe and a robust domestic market, with new technologies expected to drive further growth [3][18] Wind Power - Wind power installations have seen a substantial increase, with a reported 134.2% growth in new installations from January to May 2025 [20]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the steel industry is "Positive" [2] Core Viewpoints - The steel sector has shown resilience during the off-peak season, with a notable increase in iron and steel production, indicating a potential investment opportunity [3][4] - The report highlights that despite challenges such as supply-demand imbalances and declining overall industry profits, the implementation of "stability growth" policies is expected to support steel demand, particularly in real estate and infrastructure sectors [4][6] - The report suggests that certain steel companies are undervalued and presents structural investment opportunities, especially for high-margin special steel enterprises and leading companies with strong cost control [4][6] Weekly Market Performance - The steel sector rose by 2.16%, outperforming the broader market, with specific segments like special steel and long products seeing increases of 2.64% and 3.70% respectively [3][11] - The average daily pig iron production reached 2.4229 million tons, reflecting a week-on-week increase [25][40] Supply Data - As of June 27, the capacity utilization rate for blast furnaces was 90.8%, with a slight increase of 0.04 percentage points week-on-week [25] - The total production of five major steel products was 7.703 million tons, marking a week-on-week increase of 1.59% [25][24] Demand Data - The consumption of five major steel products decreased to 8.799 million tons, a decline of 0.49% week-on-week [33][29] - The transaction volume of construction steel by mainstream traders increased slightly, indicating stable demand in that segment [33] Inventory Data - Social inventory of five major steel products decreased to 9.065 million tons, down 0.72% week-on-week [40][37] - Factory inventory increased to 4.335 million tons, reflecting a week-on-week rise of 1.82% [40][38] Price Trends - The comprehensive index for ordinary steel decreased to 3344.6 yuan/ton, a drop of 0.49% week-on-week [46] - The comprehensive index for special steel fell to 6591.1 yuan/ton, down 0.29% week-on-week [46] Profitability - The profit per ton for rebar produced in blast furnaces was 145 yuan, a decrease of 6.45% week-on-week [54] - The average cost of pig iron was reported at 2138 yuan/ton, reflecting a week-on-week decline [54] Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on regional leaders with advanced equipment and environmental standards, as well as companies benefiting from the new energy cycle [4][70]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the coal mining sector is "Positive" [2] Core Viewpoints - The current phase is seen as the beginning of a new upward cycle in the coal economy, with a resonance between fundamentals and policies, making it an opportune time to accumulate coal sector stocks [11][12] - The coal price has stabilized and is expected to continue its upward trend due to safety inspections in production areas, ongoing inventory depletion at ports, and the initiation of peak season demand [11][12] - The valuation of the coal sector remains low, and the continuous improvement in fundamentals and price expectations has not yet been fully reflected, highlighting the sector's investment value [11][12] Summary by Sections Coal Price Trends - As of June 28, the market price for Qinhuangdao port thermal coal (Q5500) is 614 CNY/ton, up 4 CNY/ton week-on-week [11][29] - The international thermal coal offshore price for Newcastle NEWC5500 is 65.3 USD/ton, down 1.3 USD/ton week-on-week [11][29] - The price for coking coal at Jing Tang port remains stable at 1250 CNY/ton [11][31] Supply and Demand Analysis - The capacity utilization rate for sample thermal coal mines is 92.9%, down 1.6 percentage points week-on-week, while the coking coal mine utilization rate is 82.48%, down 2.0 percentage points [11][48] - Daily coal consumption in inland provinces has increased by 14.5 thousand tons/day (+4.13%), while consumption in coastal provinces has decreased by 1.6 thousand tons/day (-0.84%) [11][49] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on stable and high-performing companies such as China Shenhua, Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry, and China Coal Energy, as well as those with significant upside potential like Yanzhou Coal Mining and China Power Investment [12][13] - The coal sector is characterized by high performance, high cash flow, and high dividend yields, making it an attractive investment opportunity [12][13]

新疆、蒙西发布 136 号文承接方案，西气东输四线全线贯通 【】【】[Table_Industry] 公用事业—电力天然气周报 [Table_ReportDate] 2025 年 6 月 28 日 15666646523.tcy 证券研究报告 行业研究——周报 [Table_ReportType] 行业周报 [Table_StockAndRank] 公用事业 投资评级 看好 上次评级 看好 [Table_Author] 左前明 能源行业首席分析师 执业编号：S1500518070001 联系电话：010-83326712 邮 箱：zuoqianming@cindasc.com 李春驰 电力公用联席首席分析师 执业编号：S1500522070001 联系电话：010-83326723 邮 箱：lichunchi@cindasc.com 邢秦浩 电力公用分析师 化工行业： 执业编号：S1500524080001 联系电话：010-83326712 邮 箱：xingqinhao@cindasc.com 唐婵玉 电力公用分析师 执业编号：S1500525050001 邮 箱：tangchanyu@cindasc.co ...

Report Industry Investment Rating The document does not provide information about the report industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints - The rally of ultra-long credit bonds has paused, with 3 - 5-year medium and low-grade bonds performing better. Interest rate bond yields have shown narrow fluctuations overall, while credit bond yields have also maintained a volatile pattern. Credit spreads have different changes across various maturities and ratings [2][5]. - Most urban investment bond spreads have increased, with varying trends among different regions and ratings [2][9]. - Industrial bond spreads are generally stable, but the spreads of mixed-ownership real estate bonds continue to rise [2][13]. - Most yields of secondary capital and perpetual bonds (Two-Permanent Bonds) have increased, and the spreads have slightly widened [2][26]. - The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds have decreased, while those of urban investment perpetual bonds have slightly increased [2][28]. Summary by Directory 1. The Rally of Ultra-long Credit Bonds Pauses, 3 - 5-year Medium and Low-grade Bonds Perform Better - Interest rate bond yields have narrow fluctuations: 1Y and 5Y Guokai bond yields have decreased by 1BP, 3Y yields remain flat, and 7Y and 10Y yields have increased by 1 - 2BP [5]. - Credit bond yields are volatile: The yields of 7-year and 3 - 5-year high-grade bonds have rebounded, while 3 - 5-year medium and low-grade bonds perform relatively strongly. Yield changes vary by maturity and rating [5]. - Credit spreads: 1Y spreads change between -1 and 1BP; 3Y AAA spreads increase by 3BP, others decrease by 2BP; 5Y AAA spreads increase by 3BP, others decrease by 3 - 4BP; 7Y spreads increase by 0 - 1BP; 10Y spreads of AAA, AA+, and AA change by 2BP, -2BP, and 1BP respectively [2][5]. - Rating and term spreads show obvious differentiation [5]. 2. Most Urban Investment Bond Spreads Increase - External ratings: AAA and AA+ platform spreads increase by 2BP, AA platform spreads increase by 3BP [2][9]. - Provincial platforms: Most AAA platform spreads increase by 1 - 3BP, with Guangxi decreasing by 4BP, Jilin and Liaoning increasing by 5BP; most AA+ platform spreads increase by 1 - 3BP, Jilin increasing by 7BP; most AA platform spreads increase by 1 - 3BP, Liaoning decreasing by 6BP, Xinjiang and Gansu increasing by 4BP [9][10][11]. - Administrative levels: Provincial, prefecture-level, and district-level platform spreads all increase by 2BP, with different trends in different regions [14][15]. 3. Industrial Bond Spreads are Generally Stable, Mixed-ownership Real Estate Bond Spreads Continue to Rise - Real estate bonds: Central and local state-owned enterprise real estate bond spreads are basically flat compared to last week, mixed-ownership real estate bond spreads increase by 8BP, and private enterprise real estate bond spreads increase by 40BP. Spreads of individual real estate companies vary [2][13]. - Other industrial bonds: AAA coal bond spreads increase by 1BP, AA+ remain flat, AA decrease by 1BP; AAA and AA+ steel bond spreads decrease by 1BP and 2BP respectively; spreads of various grades of chemical bonds increase by 0 - 1BP. Spreads of individual companies such as Shaanxi Coal and HBIS decrease by 1BP, while Jinkong Coal Industry increases by 7BP [13]. 4. Most Yields of Two-Permanent Bonds Increase, Spreads Slightly Widen - 1Y bonds: Secondary capital bond yields of all grades increase by 1 - 2BP, perpetual bond yields increase by 2 - 3BP, and spreads generally increase by 2 - 3BP [26]. - 3Y bonds: Secondary capital bond yields of all grades increase by 2 - 4BP, perpetual bond yields increase by 1BP, and spreads increase in line with yields [26]. - 5Y bonds: Yields and spreads of all grades of Two-Permanent Bonds increase by 0 - 1BP [26]. 5. The Excess Spreads of Industrial Perpetual Bonds Decrease, Urban Investment Bond Excess Spreads Slightly Increase - Industrial perpetual bonds: The excess spreads of industrial AAA 3Y perpetual bonds decrease by 2.38BP to 3.81BP, at the 0.07% percentile since 2015; the excess spreads of AAA 5Y perpetual bonds decrease by 2.60BP to 8.51BP, at the 5.80% percentile [2][28]. - Urban investment perpetual bonds: The excess spreads of urban investment AAA 3Y perpetual bonds increase by 0.15BP to 6.14BP, at the 2.86% percentile; the excess spreads of AAA 5Y perpetual bonds increase by 0.44BP to 9.81BP, at the 8.80% percentile [2][28]. 6. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - Market credit spreads are calculated based on ChinaBond Medium and Short-term Notes and ChinaBond Perpetual Bonds data, with historical percentiles since early 2015 [36]. - Credit spreads of industrial and urban investment individual bonds are calculated by subtracting the yield of the same-term Guokai bond from the individual bond's ChinaBond valuation, and then averaged to get the industry or regional credit spreads [36]. - Excess spreads of bank secondary capital and perpetual bonds, as well as industrial and urban investment perpetual bonds, are calculated by subtracting the credit spreads of corresponding benchmark bonds [36]. - Samples of industrial and urban investment bonds are selected from medium notes and public corporate bonds, excluding guaranteed and perpetual bonds. Bonds with remaining maturities below 0.5 years or above 5 years are excluded [36]. - Industrial and urban investment bonds use external entity ratings, while commercial banks use ChinaBond implicit debt ratings [36].

Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the industry [2] Core Insights - The GRI has released new sustainability reporting standards, GRI 102 on climate change and GRI 103 on energy, aimed at promoting corporate responsibility and accelerating climate action [3][15] - The Chinese Ministry of Finance has issued a draft application guide for the "Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards," focusing on nine core issues and emphasizing the importance of the value chain [11][12] Summary by Sections Domestic Developments - The Ministry of Finance published a draft application guide for corporate sustainability disclosure standards on June 24, 2025, detailing nine key areas and aligning with international standards while reflecting Chinese characteristics [11] - The People's Bank of China is revising the sustainable disclosure guidelines for financial institutions, with over 87% of Chinese companies disclosing data points aligned with IFRS S2 [12] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has released an implementation plan for green and low-carbon standardization, aiming to revise over 100 standards by 2027 [13] - Chengdu has established 1,458 "waste-free city cells," achieving a 15.64% reduction in energy consumption per unit of industrial added value [14] ESG Financial Products Tracking - As of June 27, 2025, China has issued 3,585 ESG bonds with a total outstanding amount of 5.52 trillion RMB, where green bonds account for 61.51% of the total [4][27] - The market has 899 existing ESG products with a total net asset value of 10,534.20 billion RMB, with ESG strategy products making up 53.03% [33] - There are 951 existing ESG bank wealth management products, with pure ESG products representing 56.68% of the total [38] Index Tracking - As of June 27, 2025, most major ESG indices outperformed the market, with the Wind All A Sustainable ESG index showing the highest increase of 2.63% [5][39] - Over the past year, major ESG indices have all increased, with the Huazheng ESG index showing the largest gain of 15.46% [39] Expert Opinions - An assistant researcher from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics noted that under low interest rates, green finance can still function effectively, although the issuance of green bonds has significantly decreased [41] - A director from Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University emphasized that international investors' focus on ESG has evolved beyond mere compliance to include detailed assessments of carbon footprints and operational practices [41]

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods Model Name: Continuous Hedging Strategy - **Construction Idea**: The strategy is based on the analysis of basis convergence factors and optimization strategies[43] - **Construction Process**: - **Backtesting Parameters and Settings**: - **Backtesting Period**: July 22, 2022, to June 27, 2025[44] - **Spot End**: Hold the total return index of the corresponding underlying index[44] - **Futures End**: Use 70% of the funds for the spot end, short the corresponding nominal principal amount of CSI 500 (CSI 300, SSE 50, CSI 1000) stock index futures contracts, occupying the remaining 30% of the funds. After each rebalancing, recalculate the quantity of the spot and futures ends based on the product's net value[44] - **Rebalancing Rules**: Continuously hold quarterly/monthly contracts until the remaining days to expiration are less than 2 days. On that day, close the position at the closing price and simultaneously short the next quarterly/monthly contract at the closing price[44] - **Remarks**: Allocate equal principal to the spot and futures ends, without considering transaction fees, impact costs, and the non-infinite divisibility of futures contracts[44] - **Evaluation**: The strategy is designed to optimize hedging by continuously adjusting positions based on basis convergence factors[43] Model Name: Minimum Basis Strategy - **Construction Idea**: The strategy selects the contract with the smallest annualized basis discount for hedging[45] - **Construction Process**: - **Backtesting Parameters and Settings**: - **Backtesting Period**: July 22, 2022, to June 27, 2025[45] - **Spot End**: Hold the total return index of the corresponding underlying index[45] - **Futures End**: Use 70% of the funds for the spot end, short the corresponding nominal principal amount of CSI 500 (CSI 300, SSE 50, CSI 1000) stock index futures contracts, occupying the remaining 30% of the funds. After each rebalancing, recalculate the quantity of the spot and futures ends based on the product's net value[45] - **Rebalancing Rules**: When rebalancing, calculate the annualized basis of all tradable futures contracts on the day and select the contract with the smallest annualized basis discount for opening a position. Hold the same contract for 8 trading days or until the remaining days to expiration are less than 2 days, then select a new contract (excluding futures contracts with less than 8 days to expiration). Even if the selection result is to hold the original contract unchanged, continue to hold for 8 trading days[45] - **Remarks**: Allocate equal principal to the spot and futures ends, without considering transaction fees, impact costs, and the non-infinite divisibility of futures contracts[45] - **Evaluation**: The strategy aims to minimize basis discount by selecting the optimal contract for hedging[45] Model Backtesting Results Continuous Hedging Strategy - **CSI 500 Index Futures**: - **Annualized Return**: -2.77% (monthly), -2.08% (quarterly), -0.98% (minimum basis)[47] - **Volatility**: 3.88% (monthly), 4.77% (quarterly), 4.69% (minimum basis)[47] - **Maximum Drawdown**: -8.15% (monthly), -8.34% (quarterly), -7.97% (minimum basis)[47] - **Net Value**: 0.9215 (monthly), 0.9405 (quarterly), 0.9718 (minimum basis)[47] - **Annual Turnover**: 12 (monthly), 4 (quarterly), 17.53 (minimum basis)[47] - **2025 YTD Return**: -3.31% (monthly), -1.35% (quarterly), -0.69% (minimum basis)[47] - **CSI 300 Index Futures**: - **Annualized Return**: 0.58% (monthly), 0.77% (quarterly), 1.42% (minimum basis)[52] - **Volatility**: 3.02% (monthly), 3.37% (quarterly), 3.16% (minimum basis)[52] - **Maximum Drawdown**: -3.95% (monthly), -4.03% (quarterly), -4.06% (minimum basis)[52] - **Net Value**: 1.0171 (monthly), 1.0226 (quarterly), 1.0418 (minimum basis)[52] - **Annual Turnover**: 12 (monthly), 4 (quarterly), 15.46 (minimum basis)[52] - **2025 YTD Return**: -0.63% (monthly), 0.27% (quarterly), 0.82% (minimum basis)[52] - **SSE 50 Index Futures**: - **Annualized Return**: 1.07% (monthly), 2.04% (quarterly), 1.76% (minimum basis)[56] - **Volatility**: 3.14% (monthly), 3.57% (quarterly), 3.16% (minimum basis)[56] - **Maximum Drawdown**: -4.22% (monthly), -3.75% (quarterly), -3.91% (minimum basis)[56] - **Net Value**: 1.0315 (monthly), 1.0605 (quarterly), 1.0521 (minimum basis)[56] - **Annual Turnover**: 12 (monthly), 4 (quarterly), 15.81 (minimum basis)[56] - **2025 YTD Return**: 0.07% (monthly), 1.11% (quarterly), 1.09% (minimum basis)[56] - **CSI 1000 Index Futures**: - **Annualized Return**: -6.00% (monthly), -4.44% (quarterly), -3.79% (minimum basis)[58] - **Volatility**: 4.73% (monthly), 5.78% (quarterly), 5.60% (minimum basis)[58] - **Maximum Drawdown**: -14.00% (monthly), -12.63% (quarterly), -11.11% (minimum basis)[58] - **Net Value**: 0.8523 (monthly), 0.8843 (quarterly), 0.9009 (minimum basis)[58] - **Annual Turnover**: 12 (monthly), 4 (quarterly), 16.02 (minimum basis)[58] - **2025 YTD Return**: -8.76% (monthly), -4.36% (quarterly), -3.55% (minimum basis)[58] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods Factor Name: Cinda-VIX - **Construction Idea**: Reflects the market's expectation of future volatility of the underlying asset[61] - **Construction Process**: - **Algorithm**: Based on the methodology in the report series "Exploring Market Sentiment Implied in the Options Market"[61] - **Data**: As of June 27, 2025, the 30-day VIX values for SSE 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 are 17.47, 16.92, 23.84, and 21.35, respectively[61] - **Evaluation**: The index accurately reflects the volatility expectations of the market for different time horizons[61] Factor Name: Cinda-SKEW - **Construction Idea**: Measures the skewness of implied volatility across different strike prices[69] - **Construction Process**: - **Algorithm**: Based on the methodology in the report series "Exploring Market Sentiment Implied in the Options Market"[69] - **Data**: As of June 27, 2025, the SKEW values for SSE 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 are 95.51, 97.95, 93.74, and 101.14, respectively[70] - **Evaluation**: The index provides valuable insights into market expectations of extreme events and tail risks[70] Factor Backtesting Results Cinda-VIX - **SSE 50**: 17.47[61] - **CSI 300**: 16.92[61] - **CSI 500**: 23.84[61] - **CSI 1000**: 21.35[61] Cinda-SKEW - **SSE 50**: 95.51[70] - **CSI 300**: 97.95[70] - **CSI 500**: 93.74[70] - **CSI 1000**: 101.14[70]

Group 1: Income Growth Discrepancy - There is a persistent income growth gap between first-tier cities and the national average, with first-tier cities' income growth lagging by approximately 0.8 percentage points in 2024[2] - In Q1 2024, the income growth rate for first-tier cities was 4.6%, nearly 1 percentage point lower than the national growth rate[7] - The income growth rate for first-tier cities has been consistently lower than the national average since 2020, indicating a widening gap[2] Group 2: Income Structure Differences - The primary source of disposable income for both first-tier cities and the national average is wage income, with growth rates for wage income being similar[10] - However, first-tier cities rely more on property income for growth, while the national average sees growth driven by net transfer income[10] - Property income accounts for 14% of disposable income in first-tier cities, compared to only 8.3% in the national average[18] Group 3: Dual Constraints on First-Tier Cities - First-tier cities face dual constraints on income growth: property income and net transfer income, with the latter being more significantly impacted by fiscal pressures[19] - The recovery of net transfer income in first-tier cities is expected to be slow due to high fiscal dependency, limiting the reduction of income disparity with the national average[26] - Positive changes in property income growth have been observed, particularly in Beijing, where property income growth reached 2.3% in Q1 2023, suggesting potential for narrowing the income gap[26] Group 4: Risks and Challenges - Consumer confidence recovery is slow, and policy implementation may not meet expectations, posing risks to income growth in first-tier cities[32]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" [1] Core Views - The company is expected to improve liquidity through the issuance of new H shares and convertible bonds, with a total expected fundraising net amount of approximately HKD 58.33 billion [2][3] - The company has successfully transformed into a comprehensive logistics leader, expanding into various emerging sectors such as express delivery, cold chain, and international logistics, which are expected to enhance profitability and revenue growth [4] - The projected net profit for the company from 2025 to 2027 is expected to grow by 17.1%, 19.7%, and 18.2% respectively, indicating a strong growth trajectory [4] Summary by Sections Fundraising and Liquidity Improvement - The company plans to issue 70 million new H shares at a price of HKD 42.15 per share, which is a discount of approximately 8.8% from the closing price on June 25 [2] - Additionally, the company intends to issue zero-coupon convertible bonds worth HKD 29.5 billion, with an initial conversion price of HKD 48.47 per share, representing a premium of about 5.3% [3] - The funds raised will be used to enhance international and cross-border logistics capabilities, develop advanced technologies, and optimize the company's capital structure [3] Financial Projections - The total revenue for the company is projected to reach HKD 315.54 billion in 2025, with a year-on-year growth rate of 10.9% [5] - The company's gross profit margin is expected to improve from 12.8% in 2023 to 14.8% in 2027 [5] - The earnings per share (EPS) is forecasted to increase from CNY 2.39 in 2025 to CNY 3.37 in 2027 [5] Profitability and Valuation - The company is expected to maintain a strong cash flow, with cash assets amounting to approximately CNY 427.71 billion as of the end of Q1 2025 [3] - The projected price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios for 2025, 2026, and 2027 are 21.1x, 17.6x, and 14.9x respectively, indicating a favorable valuation outlook [4]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Positive" [2] Core Viewpoints - The report emphasizes the importance of focusing on Hong Kong's dividend assets in the context of a low-interest environment, which benefits financing costs for Hong Kong stocks, particularly in the water and waste incineration sectors [3][16] - The report highlights a significant reduction in capital expenditure in the industry, indicating a shift towards positive free cash flow and stable dividend payouts [3][16] - The report suggests that the "14th Five-Year Plan" will maintain high demand for energy conservation, environmental protection, and resource recycling, which is expected to sustain high industry prosperity [34] Market Performance - As of June 20, the environmental sector declined by 2.51%, underperforming the broader market, with specific declines in various sub-sectors such as water governance and waste incineration [3][9][10] - The report notes that the green electricity trading volume in China reached 220.945 billion kWh from January to May 2025, a year-on-year increase of 49.2% [26] Company Announcements - The report provides detailed financial forecasts and dividend rates for several companies, including: - Yuehai Investment: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 65%, dividend yield of 4.66% [18] - Beikong Water: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 91%, dividend yield of 6.41% [20] - China Water: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 30%, dividend yield of 6.1% [21] - China Everbright Environment: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 41.84%, dividend yield of 5.94% [22] - Green Power Environmental: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 73.39%, dividend yield of 9% [24] - Tianjin Chuangye Environmental: 2024 dividend payout ratio of 34%, dividend yield of 5.58% [25] Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on quality operational assets in the water and waste incineration sectors, which are expected to benefit from stable earnings and cash flow [34] - Key recommendations include companies such as Hanlan Environment, Xingrong Environment, and Hongcheng Environment, with additional attention to companies like Wangneng Environment and Junxin Co. [34]