Summary of Credit Bond Yield Trends in April Overall Credit Bond Performance - In April, credit bond yields exhibited a downward trend overall, with short-term spreads narrowing across the board. However, the decline in medium to long-term yields was less pronounced compared to the same maturity national development bonds, leading to a widening of credit spreads [5][9][11]. - By the end of April, short-term credit spreads remained at historically low levels, while medium to long-term financial bonds were at relatively high historical percentiles [5][11]. Industry-Specific Credit Spread Trends - **Industrial Bonds**: Most AAA-rated industrial bonds saw credit spreads widen in April. Among public bonds, the financial holding sector experienced the largest widening of 8.68 basis points, while the textile and apparel sector saw the most significant narrowing of 4.89 basis points. In private bonds, the basic chemical and retail sectors experienced slight narrowing, while other sectors generally widened by 3-10 basis points, with the steel sector widening the most at 10.86 basis points [13][15]. - **Local Government Bonds**: Credit spreads for local government bonds showed mixed trends, with lower-rated bonds generally narrowing while higher-rated bonds widened. Regions with relatively high spreads, such as Guizhou and Qinghai, mostly saw narrowing, while lower spread regions like Beijing and Shanghai experienced widening [5][9]. - **Financial Bonds**: The credit spreads for bank perpetual bonds mostly narrowed, while the spreads for securities company subordinated bonds and insurance company capital replenishment bonds widened across the board [5][9]. Historical Context - The credit spreads for various types of bonds remained at historically low levels, with AA-rated public and private industrial bonds reaching 30%-50% of their historical percentiles. Financial bonds generally had higher spread levels, exceeding the 30% historical percentile [11][12]. Key Industry Observations - In April, the steel and coal industries saw credit spreads widen across the board, with changes not exceeding 7 basis points. The high-grade bonds in these sectors experienced more significant widening. The electricity and construction engineering sectors also saw most spreads widen [15][16].

研究报告 股指周报 市场震荡格局生变，弱势特征初现 | 华龙期货投资咨询部 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 投资咨询业务资格： | | | | | 证监许可【2012】1087 号 | | | | | 金融板块研究员：邓夏羽 | | | | | 期货从业资格证号：F0246320 | | | | | 投资咨询资格证号：Z0003212 | | | | | 电话：13519655433 | | | | | 邮箱：383566967@qq.com | | | | | 报告日期：2025 5 20 | 年 | 月 | 日星期一 | 【行情复盘】： 上周 IF2506 报收于 3846.2 点，相较前一周 上涨 37.4 点，涨幅 0.01%。IH2506 报收于 2693.0 点，相较前一周下跌 2.2 点，跌幅 0.08%。IC2506 报收于 5561.8 点，相较前一周下跌 40.0 点，跌 幅 0.71%。IM2506 报收于 5872.0 点，相较前一周 下跌 61.8 点，跌幅 1.04%。 本报告中所有观点仅供参 考，请投资者务必阅读正文之后 的免责声明。 *特 ...

证券研究报告 | 债券点评报告 2025 年 05 月 26 日 6 月地方债发行节奏展望 ——地方债周报 一、一级市场情况 【净融资】本周地方债共发行 2485 亿元，净融资减少。本周地方债发行量为 2485 亿元，偿还量为 1059 亿元，净融资为 1426 亿元。发行债券中，新增一 般债 55 亿元，新增专项债 1076 亿元，再融资一般债 865 亿元，再融资专项债 490 亿元。 【发行期限】本周 10Y 地方债发行占比最高（33%），10Y 及以上发行占比为 75%，与上周相比有所下降。7Y、10Y、15Y、20Y 和 30Y 地方债发行占比分 别为 12%、33%、8%、12%和 23%，其中 7Y 地方债发行占比下降较多，环比 下降约 10 个百分点。 【发行利差】本周地方债加权平均发行利差为 11bp，较上周有所收窄。其中 30Y 地方债加权平均发行利差最高，达 18.4bp。本周除 1Y 地方债加权平均发行利 差有所走阔外，其余期限均有所收窄。本周四川、山东等地方债加权平均发行 利差较高，超过 16bp，而浙江发行利差相对较低。 【募集资金投向】截至本周末，2025 年以来新增专项债募集资 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - The recent rise in US Treasury yields is driven by concerns about US fiscal sustainability, inflation expectations pushed up by US tariff policies, and a weakening demand for US Treasuries. Moody's downgrade of the US sovereign credit rating has caused short - term upward pressure on yields, and the US tariff policy has increased short - term inflation risks, with the 1 - year inflation expectation reaching 7.3% in May. The demand for US Treasuries has weakened, especially in the long - term bond primary market, leading to a steeper yield curve [2][10][15]. - The impact of rising US Treasury yields on the domestic bond market is limited. The domestic bond market is mainly driven by domestic demand and is expected to be moderately strong with an oscillatory trend. Domestic institutions are the main players in the domestic bond market, and the monetary policy is domestically focused and expected to remain loose [3][24]. - In the bond market trading strategy, the approach of taking profits on price increases and adding positions on price drops is recommended. Attention can be paid to the allocation value of 6 - 7 - year China Development Bank bonds. Currently, the new 10 - year China Development Bank bonds and new 30 - year Treasury bonds are more cost - effective, and the new - old bond spread of the 30 - year Treasury bond 2500002 is expected to widen further [4][27][28]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 1. Reasons, Outlook, and Impact of the Rise in US Treasury Yields - **Reasons for the Rise in US Treasury Yields** - Moody's downgrade of the US sovereign credit rating has increased market concerns about US debt risks, causing short - term upward pressure on yields [2][10]. - The US tariff policy has increased short - term inflation risks. The uncertainty of the policy has pushed up the inflation expectations of the US household sector, with the 1 - year inflation expectation reaching 7.3% in May, making it difficult for long - term Treasury yields to decline [2][10]. - The demand for US Treasuries has weakened. The primary market subscription enthusiasm has declined, especially for long - term bonds. As of May 9, the subscription multiple of long - term Treasury bonds in May dropped to 1.97 times from 2.33 times in April, and the weaker long - end subscription sentiment has steepened the yield curve [15]. - **Outlook for US Treasury Yields** - In the short term, US Treasury yields are expected to oscillate at a high level. The high uncertainty of the US tariff policy, persistent inflation expectations, concerns about US fiscal sustainability, and weakening demand for US Treasuries make it difficult for yields to decline. However, the pressure for a significant further increase in yields is controllable due to the possibility of Fed rate cuts and a weakening US economy [24]. - **Impact on the Domestic Bond Market** - The impact of rising US Treasury yields on the domestic bond market is limited. Domestic institutions are the main players in the domestic bond market, and the monetary policy is domestically focused and expected to remain loose. The domestic bond market is expected to be moderately strong with an oscillatory trend [3][24]. 2. Bond Market Trading Strategies - Adopt the strategy of taking profits on price increases and adding positions on price drops [4][27]. - Focus on the allocation value of 6 - 7 - year China Development Bank bonds [4][27]. - The new 10 - year China Development Bank bonds and new 30 - year Treasury bonds are more cost - effective. The 30 - year Treasury bond 2500002 has become an active bond after its listing, and its new - old bond spread is expected to widen further as there are still 3 additional issuances planned [4][27][28].

证券研究报告 固收 沿着债市定价体系找机会 华泰研究 2025 年 5 月 25 日│中国内地 利率周报 研究员 张继强 SAC No. S0570518110002 SFC No. AMB145 zhangjiqiang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 研究员 吴宇航 SAC No. S0570521090004 wuyuhang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 研究员 仇文竹 SAC No. S0570521050002 qiuwenzhu@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 联系人 欧阳琳 SAC No. S0570123070159 ouyanglin@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 联系人 朱逸敏 SAC No. S0570124070133 zhuyimin@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 与信贷等广谱利率对比：债市定价基本合理 债券与存贷款之间会通过比价效应和机构行为传导。但本次 LPR 下调后， 一些银行通过减少加点幅度，仍维持新增按揭贷款 3%的原利率。如果 3% 是房贷利率的 ...

Core Insights - The recent upward trend in Japanese government bond yields is attributed to a steepening yield curve and widening term spreads, with the 30Y yield reaching 3.06% as of May 22, marking a historical high [1][12] - The Japanese economy is emerging from a prolonged deflationary period, with CPI and core CPI recorded at 3.6% and 3.5% respectively in April 2025, exceeding the Bank of Japan's inflation target for over two years [2][16] - The proportion of Japanese government bonds held by the Bank of Japan has slightly decreased, with the central bank holding 557 trillion yen as of March 2025, down 4.6% from November 2023 [3][28] Group 1: Japanese Bond Market Dynamics - The yield curve for Japanese government bonds has steepened, with the 10s30s spread increasing to 167 basis points, driven by comments from Prime Minister Kishida and disappointing bond auction results [1][12][13] - The Bank of Japan's monetary policy is transitioning from negative to positive rates, with expectations of gradual interest rate hikes beginning in 2024 [2][21] - The Japanese government debt-to-GDP ratio has risen significantly, reaching 260% by 2025, raising concerns about long-term economic implications [4][25][26] Group 2: Impact on Asset Classes - The rising yields on Japanese bonds are expected to increase the financial burden on the Japanese government, potentially leading to higher interest payments [5][36] - The narrowing of the Japan-U.S. interest rate differential may lead to a depreciation of the dollar and an appreciation of non-U.S. currencies, impacting global capital flows [5][36] - The outlook for equities suggests that both Japanese and U.S. stocks may face short-term pressure, while the impact on Hong Kong and A-shares is expected to be more indirect [5][36]

存款利率下调信用债表现强势 中长端信用利差显著压缩 —— 信用利差周度跟踪 [[Table_R Table_Report eportTTime ime]] 2025 年 5 月 24 日 请阅读最后一页免责声明及信息披露 http://www.cindasc.com 1 歌声ue 证券研究报告 债券研究 [Table_ReportType] 专题报告 | [Table_A 李一爽 uthor固定收益首席分析师 | ] | | --- | --- | | 执业编号：S1500520050002 | | | 联系电话：+86 18817583889 | | | 邮 | 箱： liyishuang@cindasc.com | 朱金保 固定收益分析师 执业编号：S1500524080002 联系电话：+86 15850662789 联系电话：+86 15850662789 箱： zhujinbao@cindasc.com 信达证券股份有限公司 CINDA SECURITIES CO.,LTD 北京市西城区宣武门西大街甲 127 号金隅 大厦B 座 邮编：100031 3存款利率下调信用债表现强势 中长端信用利差显著压 ...

Group 1 - The core CPI data released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics significantly impacts the foreign exchange market, causing dramatic fluctuations in the dollar index [1][3] - In June 2023, the core CPI increased by 4.8% year-on-year, exceeding expectations, which led to a 1.2% rise in the dollar index within 90 seconds [1][3] - The market quickly recalibrates interest rate expectations using the "Taylor Rule," where a 0.1% increase in core CPI raises the implied probability of rate hikes by an average of 8 percentage points [3] Group 2 - Algorithmic trading systems rapidly reassess the positions of Federal Reserve officials based on CPI data, leading to significant market movements, such as a 15 basis point rise in two-year Treasury yields within 20 minutes following a CPI release [3] - The "interest rate differential arbitrage unwinding spiral" is triggered by CPI data, which strengthens rate hike expectations and increases the actual yield on dollar assets, prompting institutional investors to shift from negative-yielding eurozone bonds [3][4] - On the day of CPI announcements, there is a positive correlation of 0.7 between the deviation of the data and the inflow of funds into dollar money market funds [3] Group 3 - High-frequency trading algorithms initiate preset strategies immediately after CPI data is released, resulting in a trading volume for dollar futures that is 18 times the daily average within the first 50 milliseconds [4] - The liquidity supply from market makers shows significant asymmetry, with the bid-ask spread for euro-dollar widening 2.3 times more when data exceeds expectations compared to when it falls short [4] Group 4 - Doo Financial recommends investors to develop a three-dimensional analytical framework that includes inflation expectation disaggregation, interest rate sensitivity testing, and volatility transmission monitoring [5] - Historical data indicates that adjusting dollar exposure to a delta-neutral position 20 minutes before CPI announcements can reduce net value drawdowns by 42% during extreme volatility [5] - The macro event analysis model has identified a 73% certainty in the mid-term trend of the dollar index when core goods inflation diverges from housing inflation, validated across six CPI events from 2022 to June 2023 [5]

【市场表现】 昨日期债延续窄幅震荡。短期看，一方面期债下跌的风险有限，当前仍处在逆周期政策周期中，资金面 持续收紧的可能性小，MLF增量续作也体现了央行对资金面的呵护，LPR与存款利率双调降，中期广谱 利率处于下行周期中；另一方面在关税压力缓释的背景下，当下央行进一步引导资金利率下行的概率也 不高，还需要观察政策后效和出口动向，目前整体或以稳为主，从期限利差的角度来看长债目前吸引力 也相对有限。短期信息空窗期，整体债市或进入震荡阶段，等待基本面指引。目前预计，短期10年期国 债利率可能在1.65%-1.7%区间波动，30年国债利率可能在1.85%-1.95%区间波动。单边策略上建议观望 为主，关注高频经济数据和资金面动态。 免责声明：本报告中的信息均来源于被广发期货有限公司认为可靠的已公开资料，但广发期货对这些信 息的准确性及完整性不作任何保证。在任何情况下，报告内容仅供参考，报告中的信息或所表达的意见 并不构成所述品种买卖的出价或询价，投资者据此投资，风险自担。本报告的最终所有权归报告的来源 机构所有，客户在接收到本报告后，应遵循报告来源机构对报告的版权规定，不得刊载或转发。 国债期货收盘涨跌不一，30年期 ...

Core Insights - The secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) reached 4.26% on May 21, marking the lowest level since December 2022, down from 4.27% the previous day [1] - The narrowing spread between SOFR and the Federal Reserve's overnight reverse repurchase agreement (RRP) rate to just 1 basis point indicates ample front-end funding due to U.S. Treasury payments and government-supported corporate cash inflows [1] - The repo market is experiencing a notable softening, particularly at this time of the month, as highlighted by Oxford Economics analyst John Canavan [1] Summary by Category SOFR and RRP Rates - SOFR reported at 4.26%, down from 4.27% [1] - The spread between SOFR and RRP rate narrowed to 1 basis point, the tightest since November 20, 2024 [1] Repo Market Dynamics - Overnight GC repo rates initially reported at 4.30%, 4.29%, and 4.28%, with bid-ask spreads of 4.28%-4.27% [1] - The effective federal funds rate remained unchanged at 4.33% [1]