截至 6 月 13 日，城投债、产业债成交期限分别加权于 2.35 年、2.98 年，均处于 2021 年 3 月以来 90%以上分位数水 平，商业银行债中，二级资本债、银行永续债以及一般商金债加权平均成交期限分别为 3.90、3.70 年、2.03 年，其 中一般商金债位于较低历史水平；从其余金融债来看，证券公司债、证券次级债、保险公司债、租赁公司债久期分别 为 1.64 年、2.05 年、3.56 年、1.62 年，其中证券公司债、证券次级债位于较低历史分位，租赁公司债位于较高历史 分位。 模型适用性风险；模型估算误差 敬请参阅最后一页特别声明 1 城投债：城投债加权平均成交期限徘徊在 2.35 年附近。其中，陕西省级城投债久期超 6 年，河北省级城投债成交久 期缩短至 0.81 年附近。同时，江苏区县级、浙江地级市、重庆区县级、广东地级市、福建区县级、四川省级、河南地 级市等区域城投债久期历史分位数已逾 90%，安徽地级市、浙江地级市、广东地级市城投债久期逼近 2021 年以来最 高。 产业债：产业债加权平均成交期限较上周有所缩短，总体处于 2.98 年附近，食品饮料行业成交久期缩短幅度较大， 缩短至 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the context of a volatile bond market and a passive widening of credit spreads, investors should prioritize high - coupon assets for certain returns and prepare in advance for the spread compression market driven by the seasonal inflow of wealth management funds in July [1][5]. - The current core contradiction in the credit bond market is the co - existence of weakening allocation demand and a passive widening of spreads in a volatile environment. Investors should seize pricing deviation opportunities under the protection of coupon safety cushions [5]. - The volatile market pattern caused by the interplay of multiple factors will continue, providing tactical opportunities for layout during market adjustments [6]. - The coupon strategy is the optimal solution in a volatile market, and portfolios should be constructed in a stratified manner according to the characteristics of liabilities [7]. - Investors should "pre - position" for the seasonal spread compression market in July and seize structural opportunities in specific bond varieties [8]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalog 3.1 Yield and Spread Overview 3.1.1 Yields and Changes of Each Tenor - Yields of various types of bonds at different tenors are presented, along with their weekly changes and historical percentiles. For example, the 0.5 - year Treasury yield is 1.41%, down 4.0bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 8.4% [14]. 3.1.2 Spreads and Changes of Each Tenor - Credit spreads of various types of bonds at different tenors are shown, including their weekly changes and historical percentiles. For instance, the 0.5 - year credit spread of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 25bp, up 2.1bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 12.7% [16]. 3.2 Yields and Spreads of Credit Bonds by Category (Hermite Algorithm) 3.2.1 Yields and Spreads of Urban Investment Bonds by Region - **Yields and Changes of Each Tenor**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at key tenors, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are provided. For example, the 0.5 - year yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.77%, up 2.6bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 1.1% [19]. - **Spreads and Changes of Each Tenor**: Credit spreads of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at key tenors, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are given. For example, the 0.5 - year credit spread of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 30.41bp, up 4.6bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 7.2% [22]. - **Yields and Changes of Each Implied Rating**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces for each implied rating, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are presented. For example, the AAA - rated yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.80%, up 3.8bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 5.1% [26]. - **Spreads and Changes of Each Implied Rating**: Credit spreads of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces for each implied rating, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are shown. For example, the AAA - rated credit spread of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 28.96bp, up 4.8bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 32.2% [31]. - **Yields and Changes of Each Administrative Level**: Yields of public non - perpetual urban investment bonds in different provinces at each administrative level, their weekly changes, and historical percentiles are provided. For example, the provincial - level yield of Anhui's public non - perpetual urban investment bonds is 1.80%, up 3.5bp from last week, with a historical percentile of 3.7% [35].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - For credit bonds, continue to focus on coupon hunting and maintain a 3 - year duration for in - depth exploration [8][9][10] - For convertible bonds, the sentiment is weak, and it is recommended to reserve positions and wait for right - side adding opportunities [11][32] 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Credit & Convertible Bond Market Observation and Thinking 3.1.1 Credit Bonds - From June 2nd to June 8th, the primary issuance of credit bonds was 273.7 billion yuan, with a slight increase compared to the previous period. The total repayment amount was 147.5 billion yuan, a reduction of about 1/3 compared to the previous period, resulting in a net inflow of 126.2 billion yuan. The average coupon rates of AAA and AA+ grades were 1.99% and 2.18% respectively, remaining flat and decreasing by 27bp compared to the previous week [8] - Short - term yields of each grade increased slightly by about 1bp, with higher - grade bonds having a larger increase. Long - term yields generally decreased by about 2bp. The risk - free yield curve shifted downward by 2 - 3bp. Short - duration spreads of each grade generally widened by about 4bp, while medium - and long - term spreads fluctuated within ±1bp. The term spreads of each grade continued to narrow by about 2bp, with the 5Y - 1Y spreads of medium - and high - grade bonds narrowing by 4 - 5bp. Most grade spreads narrowed by about 2bp, except for the 5Y AA - AAA spread which widened by 2bp [9] - In terms of urban investment bond credit spreads, most provincial credit spreads widened slightly by 1 - 2bp, with some high - valuation areas narrowing slightly. In terms of industrial bond credit spreads, industry spreads fluctuated narrowly but generally tended to widen, with a central value of about 1bp, and the real estate industry continued to widen by 14bp [9] - Affected by the fewer trading days during the holiday, the turnover rate decreased by 0.75pct to 1.01%. High - discount bonds were mainly real - estate enterprise bonds, with high - frequency and large - amplitude discount real - estate entities mainly involving Country Garden [9] - The bond market was stable last week, with a significant decline on Friday. The central bank has a strong willingness to support, but as spreads continue to narrow, the risk of credit bond valuation being affected by interest - rate bond fluctuations is increasing. It is not recommended to extend the duration at this stage, and it is advisable to maintain a 3 - year duration for in - depth exploration [10] 3.1.2 Convertible Bonds - Last week, the equity market fluctuated upward, with all major indices rising. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.13%, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 1.42%, the CSI 300 rose 0.88%, the CSI 1000 rose 2.10%, the ChiNext Index rose 2.32%, the STAR 50 rose 1.50%, and the Beijing Stock Exchange 50 rose 1.30%. The daily average trading volume increased by 114.305 billion to 1.21 trillion yuan [11] - Convertible bonds significantly followed the upward trend. The CSI Convertible Bond Index rose 1.08%, the parity center rose 0.7% to 96.0 yuan, and the conversion premium rate center decreased 1.0% to 26.0%. The daily average trading volume significantly increased to 64.075 billion yuan. Medium - and low - grade, high - price, and small - cap convertible bonds performed well, while high - grade and large - cap convertible bonds were relatively weak [11] - Currently in a data vacuum period, the equity market is expected to fluctuate. From a long - term perspective, the convertible bond market still has allocation demand, and the logic of scarce bottom - positions remains unchanged. The current convertible bond valuation is relatively neutral, not significantly overvalued. Considering potential credit risk disturbances in June, it is recommended to reserve positions and wait for right - side adding opportunities [11] 3.2 Credit Bond Review 3.2.1 Negative Information Monitoring - There were no bond defaults, overdue payments, downgrades of corporate or bond ratings, or overseas rating downgrades during the week from June 2nd to June 8th [12] - There were three major negative events: Guizhou Hongcai Investment Group Co., Ltd. was involved in two major lawsuits with a total execution amount of 604 million yuan; Huai'an Hongxin State - owned Assets Investment Management Co., Ltd. was sued for failing to pay project funds, with a total execution amount of 261 million yuan; and the credit enhancement measures of "H20 Shanshan 1" of Shanshan Group Co., Ltd. had significant adverse changes [13] 3.2.2 Primary Issuance - The primary issuance volume of credit bonds increased slightly compared to the previous period, while the maturity scale decreased significantly, resulting in a significant increase in the net inflow, exceeding 100 billion yuan. Only one credit bond was cancelled or postponed for issuance [13][14] - The primary issuance cost of medium - and low - grade bonds decreased significantly compared to the previous period, while that of high - grade bonds remained flat. The average coupon rates of AAA and AA+ grades were 1.99% and 2.18% respectively, remaining flat and decreasing by 27bp compared to the previous week. The frequency of newly issued AA/AA - grade bonds remained at a low level [14] 3.2.3 Secondary Trading - Credit bond valuations increased at the short - end and decreased at the long - end. The risk - free interest rate curve shifted downward. Short - end spreads of each grade widened significantly, while medium - and long - term spreads remained basically unchanged [16] - The term spreads of each grade continued to narrow by about 2bp, with the 5Y - 1Y spreads of medium - and high - grade bonds narrowing by 4 - 5bp. Most grade spreads narrowed by about 2bp, except for the 5Y AA - AAA spread which widened by 2bp [18] - In terms of urban investment bond credit spreads, most provincial credit spreads widened slightly by 1 - 2bp, with some high - valuation areas narrowing slightly. In terms of industrial bond credit spreads, industry spreads fluctuated narrowly but generally tended to widen, with a central value of about 1bp, and the real estate industry continued to widen by 14bp [21][23] - Affected by the fewer trading days during the holiday, the turnover rate decreased by 0.75pct to 1.01%. High - discount bonds were mainly real - estate enterprise bonds, with high - frequency and large - amplitude discount real - estate entities mainly involving Country Garden [24] 3.3 Convertible Bond Review 3.3.1 Market Overall Performance - From June 3rd to June 6th, the equity market fluctuated upward, with all major indices rising. The communication, non - ferrous metals, and electronics sectors led the gains, while the household appliances, food and beverage, and transportation sectors led the losses [28] - Seven convertible bonds with the highest gains outperformed their underlying stocks. Jinling, Yitian, and Jingyuan Convertible Bonds led the gains, rising 24.42%, 14.89%, and 14.85% respectively. Tianyang, Jinling, and Limin Convertible Bonds were relatively active in trading [28] 3.3.2 Convertible Bonds Followed the Upward Trend, and the Wait - and - See Sentiment Remained - Convertible bonds followed the upward trend. The CSI Convertible Bond Index rose 1.08%, the parity center rose 0.7% to 96.0 yuan, and the conversion premium rate center decreased 1.0% to 26.0%. The daily average trading volume significantly increased to 64.075 billion yuan. Medium - and low - grade, high - price, and small - cap convertible bonds performed well, while high - grade and large - cap convertible bonds were relatively weak [32] - Currently in a data vacuum period, the equity market is expected to fluctuate. From a long - term perspective, the convertible bond market still has allocation demand, and the logic of scarce bottom - positions remains unchanged. The current convertible bond valuation is relatively neutral, not significantly overvalued. Considering potential credit risk disturbances in June, it is recommended to reserve positions and wait for right - side adding opportunities [32]

Group 1 - The bond market has faced significant challenges in 2023, with fund managers focusing on maintaining stable net value curves and market predictions [1][4] - Future bond yields are unlikely to replicate the significant decline seen in 2022, with duration strategies expected to weaken marginally, making coupon strategies a more stable choice [1][4] - Recent adjustments in deposit rates by domestic banks have led to cautious investor sentiment regarding the bond market, with concerns over profit-taking and pressure on bank liabilities [2][3] Group 2 - Credit bonds have outperformed interest rate bonds recently, driven by a shift of funds from bank deposits to wealth management products due to lower deposit rates [2] - The performance of interest rate bonds has been lackluster, influenced by rapid market movements and weak expectations for short-term liquidity easing [2][4] - Future bond market dynamics will depend on fundamental economic conditions and the People's Bank of China's (PBOC) policy expectations, including potential resumption of government bond purchases [3][5] Group 3 - In a low-interest-rate environment, fund managers need to adopt more refined strategies, focusing on individual bonds and optimizing portfolio structures to maximize risk-return ratios [4][6] - The newly launched fund by the company, which has a 12-month holding period, aims to leverage a stable liability structure and employ a yield curve riding strategy to enhance positive returns [4][5]

证券研究报告 固收 供求支撑下的波段与品种增厚—— 2025 年中期信用债展望 华泰研究 2025 年 6 月 06 日│中国内地 中期策略 报告核心观点 高等级二永债可随利率波段交易，但空间较窄，对交易要求较高，负债端稳 定机构逢调整增配。1-3 年优质城农商行信用风险可控，可适当下沉挖掘， 增厚票息。TLAC 非资本工具关注扩容及与二级资本债比价机会。券商、保 险债交易活跃度低，以逢高配置为主。私募永续债方面，可关注 2 年以内主 流城投、中短久期地产国企及优质电力、交运、公用事业等品种配置机会。 消金小微类 ABS 放量，震荡市可品种挖掘。公募 Reits 兼顾一二级机会， 一级关注如 IDC、文旅等新资产上市和扩募机会，二级可逢市场调整增配基 本面稳健项目。 展望下半年，利率或延续震荡市格局，信用债胜在供需关系略好，存款搬家 带来非银增量需求，但理财整改、债基负债端不稳定，信用债中短端需求好 于长端。供给方面，城投严监管下，仍以央国企产业、国股行二永债为主， 关注科创债扩容、城投转型等带来的机会。化债下信用风险可控+实体融资 缓慢修复，信用利差仍有下行机会，但空间或不大且波动较多。建议继续以 震荡思路 ...

丨证券研究报告丨 固定收益丨点评报告 [Table_Title] 信用债策略转向"以守为攻" 报告要点 [Table_Summary] 6 月上中旬信用债建议转向防御性票息策略，聚焦中高等级品种以规避利率波动风险，静待超 长地方债及优质产业债配置窗口；当前信用利差收窄空间相对有限，需适当缩短久期并优选抗 跌性强的品种。存款降息推动资金向理财和保险迁移，结构性利好 AA+及以上城投债，但需警 惕弱区域城投及低等级产业债的分化风险。利率债市场尚处"预期真空期"，波动可能通过估 值、流动性及利差路径冲击信用债，建议小幅降低久期、避免资质过度下沉，静待情绪企稳期 择机布局国企产业债价值洼地。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] 赵增辉 赖逸儒 SAC：S0490524080003 SAC：S0490524120005 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 SFC：BVN394 SFC：BVZ968 %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 cjzqdt11111 2025-06-06 固定收益丨点评报告 [Table_Title2] 信用债策略转向"以守为攻" [Table_Summa] 防 ...

Core Viewpoint - June is identified as a critical transitional period for the bond market, with a focus on the downward trend of general interest rates leading to stronger bond market rates, and the increasing certainty of looser funding around the quarter-end [1][4][11]. Group 1: Market Performance - Since early May, the bond market has entered a transitional phase under funding constraints, with a gradual compression of spreads [1]. - The credit spread, particularly at the short end, has compressed to historical lows, while the spread between government bonds and policy bank bonds turned negative in late May [1][4]. - The spread between active and less active 10-year government bonds has narrowed significantly, indicating a clear trend of spread compression in the market [1][4]. Group 2: Investment Recommendations - It is recommended to focus on 10-year and 30-year non-active government bonds, including new and old special government bonds, as well as 10-year local government bonds, which offer both liquidity and static returns [1]. - For credit bonds, attention should be given to high-rated (AAA) credit bonds with a maturity of over five years that possess certain liquidity [1]. - Credit bond ETFs that are eligible for general pledged repos are also suggested for consideration [1]. Group 3: Strategic Transition - The bond market is expected to transition from a pure coupon strategy to a strategy that balances coupon and liquidity [1][11]. - The next phase of spread compression may lead to either a bear market driven by macro policy shifts or a rapid rise in bond prices if government bond rates decline sharply [11]. - The recommendation is to prepare for a shift to more liquid instruments in anticipation of the next round of interest rate declines, considering the uncertainty of funding fluctuations at the end of June [11].

从"故事"回归经济和降息视角：对比存款利率，长期中债市并未过度定价。 融资、通胀的修复相对"滞 后"。回顾 2022 年以来的广谱利率走势，以贷款利率为锚来看，当前债市利率下行步伐是合理的。当前 债市进入平台期的主要原因是：资金短摩擦，海内外因素导致国内长期低利率"故事" 持续性存疑。 双降的长短期影响：货币政策的再置换，回归"正常"的资金。 降准资金落地后，资金反而边际收紧，其 背后的直接原因或是货币政策投放节点变化所造成的波动。在 2024 年之前存款利率对资金出表的扰动并 不明显，在 2024 年之后扰动有所显现。资金短摩擦或于二季度末结束。 走楼梯之后策略轮动再起：短期票息策略占优， Q3 或有拉久期空间。 国内对长期中利率反弹风险的认知 上升抑制债市"抢跑"。短期内票息策略的性价比较高，建议维持久期但不追涨长利率债，关注曲线上的凸 点区域债种（流动性风险减低）。 Q3 建议以贷款利率为锚，降息可能都将进一步驱动利率下行。 低利率环境下的降本增利：新策略和新资产。 资产关注科创债、 REITs 等扩容。策略关注债基 ETF 的扩 容与轮动，债市量化策略的兴起。 风险提示。 基本面超预期变化、外部环境不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The overall sensitivity of deposit scale to the reduction in deposit interest rates is low under the trend of low interest rates [1] Group 1: Deposit Scale and Interest Rate Sensitivity - The deposit scale is not sensitive to the reduction in non-interbank deposit rates, primarily due to the manual interest compensation rectification in April 2024, which caused a short-term outflow of deposits to asset management products [2] - Despite several rounds of deposit rate cuts since 2022, the year-on-year growth rate of personal and corporate deposits has aligned with the growth rate of broad money supply, with the proportion of deposits in broad money supply rising from around 48% to a peak of 52% by March 2024 [2][3] - The proportion of deposits in low-risk preference funds has shown a slight decline from a peak of 79.3% in March 2023, indicating manageable outflow pressure [2] Group 2: Impact of Deposit Rate Cuts - The disturbances caused by deposit rate cuts on fund outflows were not significant before 2024, but became more pronounced afterward due to increased price comparison willingness in a low-interest environment [3] - Following the deposit rate cuts in July and October 2024, there was a noticeable decline in the year-on-year growth of large bank deposits, indicating a shift towards asset management products [3][4] - The current round of deposit rate cuts is not expected to lead to a significant tightening of the funding environment, as the year-on-year growth of deposits has remained stable despite the cuts [4] Group 3: Future Expectations - The attractiveness of asset management products relative to deposits is expected to decrease due to the ongoing adjustments in performance benchmarks and the gradual implementation of net value rectification [4] - The company anticipates that the ticket interest strategy will continue to prevail, with high-grade short-duration credit bonds likely to benefit from some funds flowing from deposits to asset management products [4]

Core Insights - The overall sensitivity of deposit scale to the reduction of deposit rates is low, indicating a strong willingness among individuals and businesses to allocate funds to bank deposits despite rate cuts [1][10] - The shift of deposits from the banking system to asset management products is primarily attributed to the manual interest compensation rectification in April 2024, which had a short-term impact but began to stabilize by July of the same year [1][10] - The proportion of personal and corporate deposits in the broad money supply has increased from approximately 48% to 52% by March 2024, reflecting a robust demand for bank deposits [1][10] Deposit Rate Adjustments - The reduction in deposit rates in July and October 2024 led to a noticeable decline in the year-on-year growth of large bank deposits, dropping from 5.8 trillion yuan to 5.2 trillion yuan and from 5.0 trillion yuan to 4.8 trillion yuan respectively [3] - The asset management product scale saw a rebound, with a shift from a year-on-year decrease of 629.5 billion yuan in August 2024 to a slight increase of 10 billion yuan, and a similar trend was observed in November 2024 [3] Deposit Growth Trends - Large banks' personal and corporate deposit year-on-year growth fluctuated, with notable increases and decreases observed in various months, indicating a dynamic response to interest rate changes [5] - The year-on-year growth of deposits in small and medium-sized banks also showed variability, with a peak growth of 81.56 billion yuan followed by a decrease of 25.29 billion yuan [5] Market Reactions - The bond market typically reacts in advance to expectations of deposit rate cuts, with rates generally declining before the official announcement, although the actual impact on market trends remains limited [10] - Following the last three deposit rate cuts, the yields on various bonds, including government bonds and credit bonds, generally trended downward over the subsequent trading days [10] Future Outlook - The current round of deposit rate cuts is expected to have a limited impact on the outflow of funds, with the probability of a return to a tight liquidity situation similar to the first quarter of the year being low [10] - The attractiveness of asset management products is anticipated to decrease due to ongoing adjustments in performance benchmarks, which may lead to a shift of funds back to deposits [10]