Report Industry Investment Rating The document does not mention the industry investment rating. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In the second quarter, the stock and bond markets both performed well, boosting the expansion of the fund industry. Although bond funds face certain redemption pressure in the short term, the current internal economic momentum is weak, the logic of asset shortage continues, and the monetary policy guides sufficient liquidity. There is no pressure for a trend adjustment in the bond market. It is expected that the scale of bond funds will continue to increase steadily in the third quarter, and the scale increase of equity - containing products may exceed that of the second quarter [6]. - The share and net asset value of the entire market's funds increased in the second quarter. The scale of bond funds increased significantly. In terms of positions, the overall allocation ratio of the entire market's funds to bonds and stocks decreased, while the allocation ratio of cash increased significantly. Among them, the bond allocation mainly showed an increase in the allocation of treasury bonds, financial bonds, and credit bonds, and a decrease in the allocation of policy - financial bonds and inter - bank certificates of deposit [6]. - The performance of equity - containing products rebounded more. Among them, the performance of long - term bonds was better than that of short - term bonds, and the performance of hybrid second - tier bond funds was better than that of hybrid first - tier bond funds. Although the performance of hybrid funds was good, the scale declined. The main reasons are that the return gap between hybrid funds and second - tier bond funds is not obvious, and the risk level is higher; and the return of hybrid funds is lower than that of stock - type funds, and the recovery of risk appetite drives the scale of stock - type funds to rise, thus suppressing the hybrid funds [7]. Summary According to the Directory 1. Fund Total Scale Rises, Bond Allocation Scale Increases - **1.1 Fund Market Scale: Fund Shares and Net Asset Value Both Increase** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, there were approximately 1.29 trillion funds in total, with a market share of about 30.90 trillion shares and a net asset value of about 33.72 trillion yuan. Compared with the end of the first quarter of 2025, the number of various funds increased by 2.44%, the market share increased by 5.14%, and the net asset value increased by 6.68% [21]. - The net asset value of hybrid funds slightly decreased, while that of other types of funds increased. The net asset value of bond - type funds increased significantly. The total share of bond funds in the second quarter of 2025 was 9.60 trillion shares, a 6.27% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025; the net asset value of bond - type funds was about 10.91 trillion yuan, an 8.54% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025 [25][32]. - The outstanding shares of pure - bond funds and hybrid bond funds increased. The new - issue shares of actively managed and passively managed bond funds both increased slightly quarter - on - quarter but decreased significantly year - on - year [36][45]. - **1.2 Fund Asset Allocation: Bond Allocation Ratio Decreases Slightly, Cash Allocation Ratio Increases** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total asset value of funds increased by 8.42% compared with the end of the first quarter of 2025. The market value of stocks held increased by 4.09% quarter - on - quarter, the market value of bonds held increased by 7.69% quarter - on - quarter, and the market value of cash held increased significantly by 32.30% quarter - on - quarter. The reason for the increase in cash allocation by funds is mainly due to the increase in the cash allocation ratio of money market funds [53]. - The proportion of funds held in stocks, bonds, and other assets decreased, while the proportion of cash held increased. At the end of the second quarter of 2025, the proportions of stocks, bonds, cash, and other assets were 19.64%, 57.80%, 12.88%, and 9.15% respectively, among which the proportion of bond - holding assets decreased by 0.39 pct quarter - on - quarter [53]. - **1.3 Fund Bond - Holding Analysis: The Allocation of Financial Bonds Increased the Most Quarter - on - Quarter** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by all funds was about 21.21 trillion yuan, a 7.69% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds increased by 7.71%, 12.82%, 8.96%, 5.33%, and 5.78% respectively quarter - on - quarter [55][56]. - The proportion of inter - bank certificates of deposit held by funds decreased the most. In the bond positions of funds at the end of the second quarter of 2025, the allocation ratios of interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, and credit bonds increased by 0.01 pct, 0.59 pct, and 0.23 pct respectively quarter - on - quarter, while the allocation ratios of inter - bank certificates of deposit and other bonds decreased by 0.78 pct and 0.05 pct respectively quarter - on - quarter [56]. 2. Bond Fund Bond - Holding Analysis - **2.1 All Bond Funds: The Total Bond - Holding Scale Increases, the Allocation Proportion of Treasury Bonds Increases, and the Allocation Proportion of Policy - Financial Bonds Decreases** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by bond - type funds was about 12.5207 trillion yuan, a 10.01% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, the market value of interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds increased by 405.9 billion yuan, 292.5 billion yuan, 380.6 billion yuan, 28.2 billion yuan, and 32.4 billion yuan respectively, with quarter - on - quarter growth rates of 7.96%, 13.05%, 11.87%, 8.85%, and 6.29% respectively [61][65]. - The allocation ratios of interest - rate bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds decreased. The market value of treasury bonds and policy - bank bonds held by all bond funds accounted for 6.46% and 37.52% of the bond investment market value respectively, with quarter - on - quarter changes of 1.29 pct and - 2.13 pct respectively. The allocation ratios of enterprise bonds and short - term financing bills increased, while the allocation ratio of medium - term notes decreased [65][67]. - **2.2 Medium - and Long - Term Pure - Bond Funds: In Terms of Allocation Proportion, Reduce the Allocation of Policy - Financial Bonds and Increase the Allocation of Treasury Bonds** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by medium - and long - term pure - bond funds was about 7.7616 trillion yuan, a 5.38% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds changed by 4.47%, 6.50%, 5.86%, 0.45%, and 11.96% respectively quarter - on - quarter [71]. - In the second quarter, the allocation ratios of financial bonds and local government bonds in medium - and long - term bond funds increased the most, while the allocation ratio of interest - rate bonds decreased significantly. The market value of treasury bonds and policy - bank bonds held by medium - and long - term pure - bond funds accounted for 6.74% and 42.63% of the bond investment market value respectively, with quarter - on - quarter changes of 1.33 pct and - 1.76 pct respectively. The allocation ratios of enterprise bonds and short - term financing bills decreased, while the allocation ratio of medium - term notes increased [71][74]. - **2.3 Short - Term Pure - Bond Funds: In Terms of Allocation Proportion, Reduce the Allocation of Non - Financial Credit Bonds and Increase the Allocation of Financial Bonds** - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by short - term pure - bond funds was about 128.05 billion yuan, a 21.29% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds increased by 28.73%, 52.18%, 13.26%, 13.10%, and 27.17% respectively quarter - on - quarter [79]. - Compared with the first quarter of 2025, short - term pure - bond funds reduced the allocation ratios of credit bonds and inter - bank certificates of deposit and increased the allocation ratios of interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, and other bonds. The market value of treasury bonds and policy - bank bonds held by short - term pure - bond funds accounted for 2.02% and 11.70% of the bond investment market value respectively, with quarter - on - quarter changes of 0.62 pct and 0.17 pct respectively. The allocation ratios of enterprise bonds, short - term financing bills, and medium - term notes decreased [79][81][82]. - **2.4 Hybrid First - Tier Bond Funds: Increase the Allocation of Cash and Bonds, Mainly Increase the Allocation of Interest - Rate Bonds and Financial Bonds** - At the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total asset value of hybrid first - tier bond funds was about 99.45 billion yuan, a 14.55% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, the market values of stocks, bonds, cash, and other assets changed by 1.85%, 15.00%, 17.19%, and - 3.39% respectively quarter - on - quarter [85]. - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by hybrid first - tier bond funds was about 96.11 billion yuan, a 15.00% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds changed by 25.48%, 30.68%, 4.17%, 23.63%, and 10.04% respectively quarter - on - quarter. The allocation ratios of interest - rate bonds and financial bonds increased, while the allocation ratio of credit bonds decreased significantly [85]. - In terms of proportion, hybrid first - tier bond funds significantly increased the allocation of treasury bonds and reduced the allocation of various non - financial credit bonds in the second quarter [88]. - **2.5 Hybrid Second - Tier Bond Funds: Increase the Allocation of Cash and Bonds, Mainly Increase the Allocation of Interest - Rate Bonds** - At the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total asset value of hybrid second - tier bond funds was about 94.03 billion yuan, a 6.94% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, the market values of stocks, bonds, cash, and other assets changed by 2.66%, 7.34%, 30.18%, and - 6.07% respectively quarter - on - quarter [90]. - As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the total value of bonds held by hybrid second - tier bond funds was about 79.61 billion yuan, a 7.34% increase from the end of the first quarter of 2025. Among them, interest - rate bonds, financial bonds, credit bonds, inter - bank certificates of deposit, and other bonds changed by 18.51%, 6.18%, 7.63%, - 16.54%, and - 3.92% respectively quarter - on - quarter. The allocation ratio of interest - rate bonds increased, while the allocation ratios of other types of bonds decreased [91]. - In the second quarter, the allocation ratio of treasury bonds in hybrid second - tier bond funds increased, while the allocation ratio of policy - bank bonds decreased. The allocation ratio of medium - term notes increased, while the allocation ratios of enterprise bonds and short - term financing bills decreased [95]. 3. Analysis of the Structure of Fund Heavy - Positioned Bonds: The Proportion of Treasury Bond Positions Continues to Rise - In the second quarter, bond funds mainly increased the allocation of treasury bonds and reduced the allocation of policy - financial bonds. In the heavy - positioned interest - rate bonds of bond - type funds in the second quarter of 2025, the proportions of treasury bonds, local government bonds, and policy - bank bonds were 11.62%, 1.34%, and 87.04% respectively. Compared with the first quarter of 2025, the allocation ratio of treasury bonds increased by 2.70 pct, the allocation ratio of local government bonds decreased by 0.12 pct, and the allocation ratio of policy - bank bonds decreased by 2.58 pct [97]. - Bond funds increased the allocation ratio of AAA - rated industrial bonds and reduced the allocation ratios of AA +, AA, and below - AA - rated industrial bonds. In the heavy - positioned industrial bonds of bond - type funds in the second quarter of 2025, the proportions of AAA, AA +, AA, and below - AA industrial bonds were 94.81%, 4.59%, 0.60%, and 0.00% respectively [101]. - Bond funds increased the allocation ratios of AAA - and AA - rated urban investment bonds and reduced the allocation ratio of AA + - rated urban investment bonds. In the heavy - positioned urban investment bonds of bond - type funds in the second quarter of 2025, the proportions of AAA, AA +, AA, and below - AA urban investment bonds were 61.30%, 29.45%, 8.91%, and 0.34% respectively [102]. - In terms of regions, at the end of the second quarter of 2025, the heavy - positioned urban investment bonds of bond - type funds were still mainly from Zhejiang, Shandong, and Jiangsu. Notably, in the second quarter, the position - holding ratios of bond funds in regions such as Guangdong and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region increased quarter - on - quarter, while the position - holding ratios in regions such as Hunan and Henan decreased quarter - on - quarter [105][106]. 4. Analysis of Fund Leverage and Duration: Both Leverage Ratio and Duration Increase - In the second quarter, the leverage ratios of medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds increased. The leverage ratios of medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds were 120.20%, 116.61%, and 113.83% respectively, increasing by 2.58 pct, 3.29 pct, and 1.73 pct respectively compared with the first quarter of 2025 [110]. - In the second quarter, the durations of medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds increased. The durations of medium - and long - term pure - bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds were 3.76 years, 4.07 years, and 3.83 years respectively, increasing by 0.79 years, 1.19 years, and 0.93 years respectively compared with the first quarter of 2025 [110]. 5. Fund Performance Analysis: The Performance of Equity - Containing Products Rebounded More - In the second quarter of 2025, the median quarterly returns of various funds were ranked as follows: stock - type funds (1.59%) > hybrid funds (1.18%) > second - tier bond funds (1.15%) > ChinaBond Treasury Bond Total Full - Price Index (1.11%) > first - tier bond funds (1.08%) > medium - and long - term pure - bond funds (0.99%) > short - term pure - bond funds (0.67%) > ChinaBond CDB Bond Total Full - Price Index (0.41%) > money - market funds (0.33%) [113]. - Although the performance of hybrid funds was good, the scale declined. The main reasons are that the return gap between hybrid funds and second - tier bond funds is not obvious, and the risk level is higher; and the return of hybrid funds is lower than that of stock - type funds, and the recovery of risk appetite drives the scale of stock - type funds to rise, thus suppressing the hybrid funds [113].

Group 1 - The core strategy for Q3 focuses on building a short-end position while exploring the "convex points" of the yield curve, emphasizing the need to maintain duration and avoid overly short positions [7][11] - The report highlights that the short-end strategy is the most certain, but it lacks significant yield enhancement potential, necessitating a continued extension of duration to contribute to returns [11][12] - The performance of credit bonds in Q2 was influenced by unstable funding conditions, with a shift to a more optimistic sentiment in May and June, leading to a rapid compression of liquidity premiums in ultra-long credit bonds [7][11] Group 2 - For bonds with maturities within 3 years, it is recommended to focus on areas with good liquidity, as high-yield issuers are scarce and low-rated municipal bonds are already undervalued [12][14] - The report suggests that the yield curve steepens beyond 3 years, indicating opportunities to extend duration in the 3-5 year segment, particularly in regions with acceptable liquidity [7][12] - The supply-demand dynamics support the continued exploration of niche products, with perpetual bonds in the 4-5 year range being a good choice for enhancing portfolio yields [7][12] Group 3 - The Q2 review indicates a shift in market sentiment from cautious to optimistic, with a decrease in the issuance of municipal bonds and a monthly net financing scale of approximately 500 billion yuan [7][8] - The report notes that the trading environment for short-end bonds has become crowded, with the market increasingly seeking returns from liquidity [7][8] - Credit risk perceptions have lightened, with a decrease in new public sentiment points related to credit risk in Q2, suggesting a stable risk environment [7][8]

Summary of Conference Call Notes Industry Overview - The conference call primarily discusses the credit bond market, highlighting a bearish trend in the overall bond market while credit bonds are outperforming, particularly in the low-grade segment [1][2][3]. Key Points and Arguments 1. **Market Performance**: The credit bond market has shown a compression in credit spreads, especially for low-grade bonds, indicating a stronger performance compared to government bonds [1]. 2. **Supply and Demand Dynamics**: - **Supply**: The supply of credit bonds is weaker than that of government bonds, with corporate credit bond issuance showing a stable trend, while government bond issuance has increased significantly [2]. - **Demand**: The demand for credit bonds is driven by a lower cost of funds and a shift in bank wealth management products towards bond investments, particularly credit bonds [3][4]. 3. **Risk Assessment**: The default rate for industrial bonds has significantly decreased, with a rolling default rate of 0.04% in May, down from the previous year, indicating a reduction in credit risk [5]. 4. **Future Supply Expectations**: The supply of government bonds is expected to decrease by 1.9 trillion yuan in the second half of the year, while credit bonds, particularly industrial bonds, are anticipated to increase [6][7]. 5. **Interest Rate Dynamics**: The widening of the credit spread is likely to favor industrial bond financing as the cost of loans becomes relatively higher compared to bond prices [7][8]. 6. **Investment Strategies**: The focus is on sectors with expected supply contractions and the potential for credit risk mitigation through government policies, particularly in the context of special bonds and debt clearance initiatives [10][11][14]. Additional Important Insights - **Market Trends**: The call notes that the issuance of credit bonds is expected to remain strong, particularly in the context of supportive government policies aimed at mitigating credit risks [10][11]. - **Regional Variations**: Different provinces are experiencing varying impacts from government policies, with some regions benefiting more from debt clearance and support measures [12][14]. - **Sector-Specific Opportunities**: There is a growing interest in technology innovation bonds, which are expected to see increased issuance and potentially favorable credit spreads compared to green bonds [17][18]. This summary encapsulates the key insights from the conference call, focusing on the credit bond market's performance, supply-demand dynamics, risk assessments, and future expectations.

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given content. 2. Core View of the Report - In the low - interest - rate era, "extending duration" and "controlling costs" are two key strategies for bond investment. The public - offering bond funds are shifting from "credit downgrading" to "duration management", and the low - cost advantage of bond - fund indexation is prominent [1][2]. - Long - duration index bond funds are the best combination of "high duration" and "low cost". Different types of long - duration index bond funds have different risk - return characteristics, and investors can choose according to their needs [3]. - Ten - year Treasury bond ETFs are effective "offensive - and - defensive" tools for enhancing portfolio returns, and are also suitable for short - term trading and rotation strategies [7]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Low - Interest - Rate Era: "Extending Duration" and "Controlling Costs" as Two Key Strategies - Since early 2014, domestic interest rates have been in a downward cycle, and the upward elasticity of interest rates has weakened. From 2015 to 2025, the market has experienced five rounds of local government debt resolution, gradually flattening the credit spread [1][12][13]. - Facing the "low - interest - rate + low - spread" environment, public - offering bond funds are shifting from "credit downgrading" to "duration management". The average allocation ratio of medium - and long - term bond funds to credit bonds has dropped from 41% in 2020 to 30% at the end of Q1 2025, while the acceptance of portfolio duration is increasing [1][20][21]. - Referring to overseas experience, in a low - interest - rate environment, Japanese public - offering bond funds have increased their allocation to long - term bonds. In terms of risk - return ratio, the cost - effectiveness of long - duration strategies has become prominent since 2021 [27][32]. - Passive index - type bond funds have a cost - saving advantage of about 11 - 15bp per year compared with actively managed products, which is a relatively certain "hidden alpha" for investors [2][33]. 3.2 Long - Duration Index Bond Funds: The Best Combination of "High Duration" and "Low Cost" 3.2.1 Choices of Long - Duration Index Tools - Mainstream long - duration index bond funds are divided into three categories: local government bonds, Treasury bonds, and policy - financial bonds, and can be further divided into "long - term tools" (7 - 10 years and 10 years) and "ultra - long - term tools" (30 years) [3][48]. - Among them, the 10 - year index - type bond funds mainly hold bonds with a remaining term of 7 - 10 years, similar to 7 - 10 - year products. The 7 - 10 - year policy - financial bond index funds are the most popular, while the local bond index funds are scarce [48][49]. 3.2.2 Differences in the Long - Duration Index Toolbox - From the duration dimension, the 10 - year and 30 - year Treasury bonds have significant differences in risk - return characteristics, corresponding to the "ballast" and "offensive spear" roles respectively. The 10 - year Treasury bond is suitable for stable long - term investment, while the 30 - year Treasury bond is suitable for aggressive investors [54]. - From the bond type dimension, 7 - 10 - year policy - financial bonds are similar to Treasury bonds, while local bonds have unique characteristics. Although the long - term performance of 7 - 10 - year local bonds is good, investors may need more patience. The investment value of Treasury bonds and policy - financial bonds is converging [55][56][61]. 3.3 Investment Strategies for Long - Duration Index Bond Funds 3.3.1 Allocation: Enhancing Portfolio Returns, "Offensive and Defensive" - Ten - year Treasury bond ETFs are effective "offensive - and - defensive" tools for enhancing portfolio returns. In the interest - rate downward cycle, they have excellent return - capturing ability, such as the 9.02% annual return of Cathay Shanghai Stock Exchange 10 - Year Treasury Bond ETF in 2024 [7][65]. 3.3.2 Trading: Capturing Band - Trading Returns from "Point - Type Market Conditions" - Long - duration index products represented by ten - year Treasury bond ETFs have high liquidity and trading convenience, and are suitable for capturing band - trading returns from "point - type market conditions" in the bond market, such as the rapid decline and rebound of the 10 - year Treasury bond yield from November 2024 to January 2025 [7]. 3.3.3 Important Tools in Rotation Strategies - A "core - satellite" strategy is proposed, using long - duration interest - rate bond ETFs as the core "base" for pure - bond rotation, and tactically adjusting the satellite positions according to short - term market conditions. Back - testing shows that the improved rotation strategy can enhance returns and has better risk - adjusted returns [7][77][80].

从"故事"回归经济和降息视角：对比存款利率，长期中债市并未过度定价。 融资、通胀的修复相对"滞 后"。回顾 2022 年以来的广谱利率走势，以贷款利率为锚来看，当前债市利率下行步伐是合理的。当前 债市进入平台期的主要原因是：资金短摩擦，海内外因素导致国内长期低利率"故事" 持续性存疑。 双降的长短期影响：货币政策的再置换，回归"正常"的资金。 降准资金落地后，资金反而边际收紧，其 背后的直接原因或是货币政策投放节点变化所造成的波动。在 2024 年之前存款利率对资金出表的扰动并 不明显，在 2024 年之后扰动有所显现。资金短摩擦或于二季度末结束。 走楼梯之后策略轮动再起：短期票息策略占优， Q3 或有拉久期空间。 国内对长期中利率反弹风险的认知 上升抑制债市"抢跑"。短期内票息策略的性价比较高，建议维持久期但不追涨长利率债，关注曲线上的凸 点区域债种（流动性风险减低）。 Q3 建议以贷款利率为锚，降息可能都将进一步驱动利率下行。 低利率环境下的降本增利：新策略和新资产。 资产关注科创债、 REITs 等扩容。策略关注债基 ETF 的扩 容与轮动，债市量化策略的兴起。 风险提示。 基本面超预期变化、外部环境不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The credit bond market has shown overall positive performance this year, with yields experiencing a downward trend, but the space for further decline in short-term credit bond yields and narrowing spreads is limited [1][2]. Credit Bond Market Analysis - As of May 21, the interbank credit bond market continues to show a downward trend in yields, with the AAA-rated 3-month yield slightly increasing by 1 basis point to 1.65%, while the 3-year yield remains stable around 1.83%, and the 5-year yield decreased by 2 basis points to 1.96% [2]. - The compression of credit spreads for 1-2 year credit varieties is nearing its limit, with 2-year credit spreads being less than 10 basis points above last year's lows, and 3-year varieties showing a distance of 10-20 basis points from last year's lows [3]. Investment Recommendations - Institutions are advised to focus on certain ticket opportunities with guaranteed yields, considering absolute yield perspectives for allocation [3]. - For institutions with weaker liability stability, it is recommended to focus on 2-3 year mid-low grade varieties, such as broker subordinated bonds, while also considering high-yield, medium-quality bonds in the 4-5 year range [3]. - For institutions with stronger liability stability, extending duration with a focus on 4-5 year varieties is suggested [3]. City Investment Bonds - City investment products remain a preferred choice among institutions, with a 20.7% quarter-on-quarter increase in cash for city investment bond issuers in Q1 2025, indicating improved liquidity due to debt relief funds [4]. - The overall supply of city investment bonds is slowing while demand continues to rise, benefiting credit spreads [4]. - Recommendations include focusing on low-grade bonds within 3 years and medium-high grade bonds in the 4-5 year range [4]. Industry Debt Performance - The overall performance of industry debt issuers has shown four main characteristics: continued decline in profitability, weak cash flow, reliance on inventory compression for cash flow, and weakened liquidity indicators [6]. - Approximately two-thirds of issuers show weakened performance, particularly in sectors like media, steel, trade, real estate, and construction [6]. - Industries performing relatively well include agriculture, logistics, non-ferrous metals, and electricity, while sectors like airports and public transport remain in loss but maintain good cash flow due to strong external financing capabilities [6]. Conclusion on Industry Debt Investment - Caution is advised for industry debt investments, with a focus on meticulous selection of bonds being crucial for future opportunities [7].

债券研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券月报】 回归基本面，信用债如何配置？ ——5 月信用债策略月报 1、城投债方面，关注 3y 以内低等级与 4-5y 中高等级投资机会。对江苏、浙 江等区域，综合实力较强、存量债券余额较多，叠加化债利好保护，可在 3y 以内下沉至 AA-品种；四川、山东、河南、湖南、湖北等地可在 2y 以内下沉 至 AA-品种，天津、重庆等区域可在 2y 以内下沉至 AA(2)品种。 2、地产债方面，关注 1-2y 央国企地产 AA 及以上品种。从板块比价来看，当 前地产债收益率具有一定吸引力，1-2yAA 品种利差在 88-98BP。4 月国务院常 务会议指出要持续稳定股市，政治局会议指出持续巩固房地产市场稳定态势， 后续仍可关注 1-2y 央国企地产 AA 及以上品种机会。但行业信用风险尚未出 清，景气度预计仍偏低，低等级主体谨慎下沉。 3、周期债方面，煤炭债短端下沉、中高等级拉久期至 3y，钢铁债规避尾部风 险。对短期风险可控的隐含评级 AA 煤企 1-2y 品种适当下沉，中高等级可拉 长久期至 3y。今年以来动力煤供需两弱，煤炭价格持续下跌，关注煤价止跌 回稳情况，若景气度持续下 ...