证券研究报告：固定收益报告 研究所 分析师:梁伟超 SAC 登记编号:S1340523070001 Email:liangweichao@cnpsec.com 研究助理:王一 SAC 登记编号:S1340125070001 Email:wangyi8@cnpsec.com 近期研究报告 《四季度，票息性价比提升——信用周 报 20250930》 - 2025.10.06 固收专题 去杠杆的国际经验与资产表现 ——债务周期专题之二 20251009 ⚫ 债务周期观察：各部门杠杆率变动分化，付息压力缓和 2025 年上半年，随着赤字率调升带动政府债发行放量，宏观杠杆 率波动项连续两个季度回升，开启新一轮宏观加杠杆小周期。1）居民 部门去杠杆进程较为深入，短期贴息政策或抑制杠杆率跌幅，但趋势 难转，探底回升时间可能相对后置。2）企业部门杠杆率波动项高位震 荡，尚未形成去杠杆趋势。信贷融资需求持续处于偏弱态势，杠杆后 续或呈现缓慢回落态势。3）政府部门杠杆的波动项或将继续震荡上 行。四季度政府部门杠杆率波动项在无新增政策补充的前提下或将有 所回落。预计"化债"方向之下，2026 年财政政策举债规模可能进一步 扩张，以 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - The issuance rules of local government bonds have changed significantly in the past decade. Policy encourages the issuance of longer - term special bonds, and the weighted average issuance term of local government bonds has been greatly extended. There may be pressure of supply - demand imbalance for ultra - long bonds in the future, and high macro - leverage ratio in the non - financial sector may lead to increased debt pressure when interest rates rise. It is recommended to address the supply - demand imbalance from both the supply and demand sides [1] Summary by Related Catalogs Changes in Local Government Bond Issuance Rules - In 2015, local governments fully launched independent bond issuance, with a maximum term of 10 years and strict restrictions on medium - and long - term proportions. In 2018, 15 - year and 20 - year terms were added. In 2019, the limit on the term - ratio structure of local bond issuance was removed, and long - term special bonds were encouraged. In 2020, 9 terms were specified, and requirements for the average issuance term of new general bonds were set [1] Differences between General Bonds and Special Bonds - General bonds are used for non - revenue public welfare projects, repaid mainly by general public budget revenue, with an average term within 10 years. Special bonds are for projects with certain revenues, repaid by government fund revenues or special revenues, and long - term issuance is encouraged. In 2025, 4.4 trillion yuan of local government special bonds are planned [1] Changes in the Weighted Average Issuance Term of Local Government Bonds - From 2015 - 2018, the weighted average issuance term was about 6 years. Since 2019, it has increased significantly from 10.3 years in 2019 to 15.5 years as of September 15, 2025. The proportion of local bonds with a term of 15 years and above has risen from 18.6% in 2019 to 48.6% as of September 15, 2025 [1] Potential Supply - Demand Imbalance of Ultra - Long Bonds - The annual issuance scale of interest - bearing bonds with a term of 20 years and above has increased from 1.96 trillion in 2021 to 4.65 trillion as of September 25, 2025. The demand for ultra - long bonds mainly comes from life insurance. However, factors such as the significant reduction of insurance preset interest rates, the peak of non - standard investment maturity of insurance funds, and the new regulations on punitive redemption fees of public funds may lead to a weakening of demand. Banks may also net sell ultra - long interest - bearing bonds in the secondary market [1] High Macro - Leverage Ratio and Debt Pressure - As of the end of March 2025, China's non - financial sector macro - leverage ratio was 292.2%, significantly higher than the average of developed economies (258%). Rising interest rates may increase the debt pressure on enterprises and local governments [1] Suggestions to Alleviate Supply - Demand Imbalance - Demand side: The central bank should restart the purchase of government bonds and expand the scope to local bonds, and encourage banks to promote ultra - long interest - bearing bonds to individual investors and guide long - term funds such as social security and annuities to increase investment. Supply side: Control the proportion of government bonds with a term of 15 years and above and encourage the issuance of floating - rate bonds [2]

Group 1 - The central bank has conducted a 600 billion MLF operation today, resulting in a net injection of 300 billion, indicating a continued loose liquidity environment [1][2][3] - The average yield of medium to long-term pure bond funds since the beginning of the year is only 0.29%, marking one of the worst years for bond investments [1] - The macro leverage ratio of China's non-financial sector reached 292.2% in Q1 2025, significantly higher than the average of developed economies at 252% [1] Group 2 - Jiangxi province has issued various local government bonds with different maturities and interest rates, including a 5-year bond at 1.80% and a 30-year bond at 2.46% [2] - The central bank has been increasing MLF operations for seven consecutive months, with expectations that market interest rates will not rise significantly in the fourth quarter [2][3] - The National Development Bank ETF has shown a 1.54% increase over the past year, with a trading volume of 330.73 million as of September 24, 2025 [3] Group 3 - The management fee for the National Development Bank ETF is 0.15%, and the custody fee is 0.05%, which are among the lowest in comparable funds [4] - The tracking error for the National Development Bank ETF over the past month is 0.011%, indicating high tracking precision compared to similar funds [5]

Group 1 - The global macro leverage ratio has been continuously increasing, primarily driven by government leverage, with total global debt exceeding 350% of GDP [2][5][6] - Major economies like the US, Japan, and China have shown a trend of increasing government leverage while corporate and household leverage remains stable or decreases [5][12][41] - The US government debt interest payments are projected to exceed $1 trillion for the first time, highlighting the growing fiscal pressure [41][42] Group 2 - The structure of leverage in major economies indicates that government departments are increasing their debt levels, while businesses and households are more cautious [5][9][12] - Japan's government has maintained a high leverage ratio, yet its economy has struggled with long-term stagnation despite significant fiscal stimulus [9][12][41] - China's government leverage has risen rapidly post-pandemic, contrasting with the declining leverage in many developed countries [12][35][41] Group 3 - The increasing reliance on debt to stimulate economic growth raises concerns about the sustainability of this model, as investment returns decline [45][46] - The need for effective fiscal policy is emphasized, with suggestions for improving the efficiency of government spending and addressing social welfare needs [57][58][59] - The demographic challenges, particularly aging populations, are driving up social security expenditures, necessitating higher government spending [33][35][41]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the world has experienced a prolonged period of relative peace since the end of World War II, leading to significant population and economic growth, but also highlights the substantial costs associated with this growth, including rising inequality and increasing public debt [1] Economic Growth and Population - Since 1945, the global population has increased from 2.5 billion to 8.1 billion, indicating a substantial demographic expansion [1] - Economic growth has outpaced population growth, but this has come at a significant cost [1] Costs of Economic Growth - The article outlines several negative consequences of economic growth, including: - Widening wealth disparity - Environmental pollution - Intensified economic conflicts between nations - Domestic debt crises [1] Debt Dependency - Major global economies are increasingly reliant on debt for growth, with the rate of debt increase surpassing economic growth rates [1] - The macro leverage ratio is continuously rising, indicating a growing dependency on borrowing [1] Recommendations for Debt Management - The article suggests several measures to address the rising public debt: - Increase transparency regarding debt levels - Make hidden debts visible - Utilize larger-scale local special bonds to replace hidden debts - Encourage local governments to obtain long-term low-interest loans from policy banks and state-owned banks to replace hidden debts [1] - It also recommends that central banks implement significant interest rate cuts and modify laws to allow central banks to purchase government bonds, thereby increasing the proportion of government bonds in central bank assets [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the long-term global peace since World War II, leading to significant population growth and economic expansion, but also highlights the rising issues of wealth disparity, environmental pollution, and increasing national debts [1] - Global macro leverage ratios have been increasing, primarily driven by government borrowing, with government debt levels reaching historical highs post-2008 financial crisis [2][5] - The article notes that the macro leverage ratio in China has surpassed 300%, exceeding that of the US and developed countries, indicating a trend of increasing government debt [2][14] Group 2 - The structure of leverage in major economies shows that government sectors are increasing leverage while corporate and household sectors are stabilizing or reducing their leverage [5][10] - The article explains that only governments are willing to increase leverage counter-cyclically, as they can coordinate fiscal and monetary policies to create favorable borrowing conditions [7][10] - It highlights that during significant economic events, government deficits and debts tend to spike, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic [16][19] Group 3 - The article discusses the challenges of tax reforms, noting that high-income countries tend to maintain stable tax revenues while facing pressures to reduce corporate tax rates [22][24] - It points out that the US has seen a decline in corporate tax burdens while increasing payroll taxes, potentially exacerbating wealth inequality [24][25] - Japan's tax structure has shifted towards consumption taxes, which disproportionately affect lower-income groups [27][28] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the need for increased government spending on social security due to aging populations, with the US seeing a significant rise in mandatory spending related to social welfare [31][34] - China's government has been increasing subsidies to social insurance funds significantly, indicating a growing fiscal burden due to demographic changes [37][38] - The article warns of diminishing returns on debt-driven growth, suggesting that the efficiency of using debt to stimulate economic growth is declining [49][51] Group 5 - The article suggests that China should focus on demand-side strategies to address overcapacity and low inflation, advocating for increased consumption from both government and households [51][58] - It discusses the importance of improving the efficiency of fiscal spending, shifting from construction-focused investments to social welfare and public services [54][58] - Recommendations include enhancing transparency in public debt, reducing local government hidden debts, and improving the overall fiscal framework to support sustainable growth [59][60]

Core Viewpoint - The easing of external constraints on China's monetary policy is expected due to the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts, which will provide more room for policy adjustments [1][2]. Group 1: Monetary Policy Environment - The Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts have led to a decline in the US dollar index, reducing pressure on the RMB exchange rate [1]. - Analysts suggest that the attractiveness of RMB assets is increasing, leading to more foreign capital inflows and higher demand for RMB, which supports its appreciation [1][2]. - The potential for further interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve may continue to alleviate pressure on the China-US interest rate differential and the RMB exchange rate, allowing for a more accommodative monetary policy environment in China [1][2]. Group 2: Internal Constraints on Monetary Policy - Internal factors, such as maintaining necessary policy space and ensuring reasonable net interest margins, pose greater constraints on China's monetary policy compared to external factors [2]. - The net interest margin of commercial banks has fallen to a new low of 1.42%, which may limit the space for further interest rate cuts [2][3]. - The need to avoid excessive liquidity that could lead to inefficient allocation of financial resources is emphasized, suggesting a preference for targeted monetary policy measures [2]. Group 3: Future Outlook for Monetary Policy - There is still room for further interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio (RRR) reductions, as the macroeconomic environment remains challenging [4][5]. - Analysts predict that the People's Bank of China may lower the RRR by 0.25 to 0.5 percentage points in the third and fourth quarters to enhance liquidity [6]. - The coordination between fiscal and monetary policies is expected to strengthen, focusing on optimizing the structure of financial support to key sectors [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve has restarted interest rate cuts, lowering the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to between 4.00% and 4.25%, which reduces external constraints on China's monetary policy and enhances its operational space and autonomy [2][3][4]. External Constraints - The Fed's rate cut alleviates external pressures on China's monetary policy, allowing for a more "self-directed" approach [3][4]. - The alignment of monetary policy cycles between China and the U.S. is expected to broaden China's policy space and enhance its autonomy [4]. - The depreciation of the dollar and the decline in U.S. Treasury yields following the Fed's decision have reduced pressure on the RMB exchange rate, further easing external constraints [4][5]. Internal Constraints - Internal factors, particularly the pressure on bank interest margins, pose a greater constraint on China's monetary policy than external factors [6]. - The narrowing of net interest margins for commercial banks, which fell to a new low of 1.42%, limits the space for further interest rate cuts [6][7]. - The need to maintain a reasonable net interest margin and avoid excessive liquidity that could lead to financial risks is crucial for the stability of the banking sector [6][7]. Future Outlook - There remains potential for further cuts in reserve requirements and interest rates, as the current economic environment still faces challenges [9][10]. - Analysts suggest that the People's Bank of China may lower the reserve requirement ratio by 0.25 to 0.5 percentage points in the latter half of the year to optimize liquidity [9][10]. - The focus of monetary policy will likely shift towards structural adjustments to stimulate effective demand and support key sectors, rather than relying solely on broad interest rate cuts [10].

Group 1 - The macro leverage ratio in China rose by 1.9 percentage points to 300.4% in Q2 2025, marking the first time it has exceeded 300% [1] - The increase in China's macro leverage ratio is attributed to the growth of debt outpacing nominal GDP growth [2] - By the end of 2019, the macro leverage ratios for China, Germany, Japan, and the US were 239.5%, 202%, 382.9%, and 256.3% respectively, with China's ratio showing the most significant increase by 2024 [2] Group 2 - The leverage ratio of the non-financial corporate sector in China has shown a pattern of increase since 2022, reaching 139.4% by Q3 2024, driven by accelerated investment in manufacturing and emerging industries [7] - The average asset-liability ratio of state-owned enterprises in China's A-share market is 85.6%, higher than that of non-state-owned enterprises at 78.3% [9] - The government leverage ratio in China has increased from 59.6% at the end of 2019 to 88.4% by the end of 2024, contrasting with the trends in Germany, Japan, and the US [11][13] Group 3 - China's government has effectively implemented counter-cyclical policies, resulting in a more favorable outcome compared to Western countries during economic downturns [15][20] - The increase in China's government leverage ratio is not solely linked to international financial crises, as evidenced by significant increases during periods of domestic economic challenges [20]

Core Insights - The decline in household deposits in July 2023 is interpreted as a seasonal effect rather than a significant economic indicator, as historical data shows similar trends in previous years [2][3] - The relationship between household deposit changes and stock market fluctuations is weak, with non-bank financial institutions playing a more crucial role in market movements [4][5] - The trend of "more savings, less borrowing" among Chinese households continues, indicating a persistent deleveraging process [7][10] Group 1: Household Deposits and Loans - In July 2023, household deposits decreased by 1.11 trillion yuan, which is 780 billion yuan more than the same month last year [1] - The decline in household loans in July 2023, amounting to 489.3 billion yuan, marks a shift from the previous trend of positive growth since 2009 [3] - Cumulatively, household deposits increased by 9.66 trillion yuan in the first seven months of 2023, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 720.3 billion yuan [3] Group 2: Stock Market Dynamics - The stock market's performance in July does not correlate strongly with household deposit changes, as evidenced by varying stock index movements despite significant deposit fluctuations in previous years [2][4] - Non-bank financial institutions saw an increase in deposits of 2.14 trillion yuan in July 2023, indicating a potential shift in investment behavior away from traditional bank deposits [4][5] Group 3: Deleveraging Trends - The household leverage ratio in China has slightly decreased to 61.1% as of Q2 2023, down from 62.3% in Q1 2023, indicating ongoing deleveraging efforts [7][10] - The average household loan increase in the first seven months of 2023 was only 680.8 billion yuan, a decrease of 579.4 billion yuan compared to the previous year [4] - The widening gap between new deposits and new loans, reaching 8.98 trillion yuan, highlights the trend of households prioritizing savings over borrowing [4]