Core Viewpoint - Gold exhibits a unique price fluctuation mechanism influenced by multiple factors, including currency pricing systems, macroeconomic risks, market structure evolution, supply-demand elasticity, and technical reinforcement mechanisms. Group 1: Currency Pricing System Linkage - The international gold price is negatively correlated with the US dollar index, where a 1% increase in the dollar index raises gold purchasing costs, suppressing investment demand [1]. - Major central banks' balance sheet expansions directly elevate gold price benchmarks, with each additional $1 trillion in quantitative easing raising gold valuations by 8%-12% [2]. Group 2: Macroeconomic Risk Matrix - The forward price of gold is determined by the nominal interest rate minus inflation expectations, with gold prices reaching a historical peak of $2075 per ounce when the real yield on US Treasuries fell below -1% [3]. - A 10-point increase in the global geopolitical risk index results in a 3.2% increase in average monthly gold holdings, evidenced by events like the Crimea crisis and the Russia-Ukraine conflict [4]. Group 3: Market Structure Evolution - Emerging market central banks have increased gold purchases for 13 consecutive years, with global official reserves rising by 1136 tons in 2022, accounting for 23% of annual supply [5]. - An increase of 100,000 open contracts in COMEX gold futures raises price volatility by 1.8 basis points, with significant spikes in implied volatility during events like the Silicon Valley Bank incident [6]. Group 4: Supply-Demand Elasticity - The average extraction cost of the top ten gold mines has risen to $1250 per ounce, with newly discovered reserves declining by 15% year-on-year [7]. - India and China account for 55% of global physical gold demand, with a 40% surge in imports during festive seasons, despite India's recent increase in import tax to 15% [8]. Group 5: Technical Reinforcement Mechanisms - Algorithmic trading strategies hold over 30 million ounces of gold, with momentum factors contributing over 35% to price volatility, triggering significant buy orders upon breaking key price levels [9]. - A 50% year-on-year increase in Google searches for "gold investment" correlates with a 68% probability of gold price increases in the following 30 days [10].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: PB-ROE-50 Strategy **Model Construction Idea**: The strategy aims to identify stocks with expectation gaps in the market and enhance portfolio returns by incorporating surprise factors (e.g., SUE, ROE growth)[30] **Model Construction Process**: 1. Based on the PB-ROE pricing model derived by Wilcox (1984), a pool of stocks with expectation gaps is identified[30] 2. Additional factors such as SUE (Standardized Unexpected Earnings) and ROE year-over-year growth are used to select 50 stocks to construct the PB-ROE-50 portfolio[30] **Model Evaluation**: The strategy underperformed in April 2025 across all stock pools, indicating potential limitations in capturing market trends during the period[30] - **Model Name**: Institutional Research Strategy **Model Construction Idea**: This strategy leverages public and private institutional research data to extract alpha by analyzing the frequency of company visits and stock performance relative to benchmarks before the visits[38] **Model Construction Process**: 1. Public and private institutional research data are collected[38] 2. Stocks are selected based on the number of visits and their relative performance to benchmarks prior to the visits[38] **Model Evaluation**: The private institutional research strategy achieved positive excess returns, while the public institutional research strategy underperformed relative to the benchmark in April 2025[38] Model Backtesting Results - **PB-ROE-50 Strategy**: - **Excess Return (April 2025)**: - CSI 500: -3.48% - CSI 800: -2.44% - All Market: -4.53%[30][34] - **Absolute Return (April 2025)**: - CSI 500: -7.20% - CSI 800: -5.59% - All Market: -7.69%[34] - **Institutional Research Strategy**: - **Excess Return (April 2025)**: - Public Research: -2.92% - Private Research: +0.04%[38][40] - **Absolute Return (April 2025)**: - Public Research: -6.05% - Private Research: -3.18%[40] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: Percentage of Advancing Stocks (Market Sentiment Indicator) **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor captures market sentiment by analyzing the proportion of stocks with positive returns in a given period. A higher proportion indicates optimism, while a lower proportion suggests caution[12] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Calculate the proportion of stocks in the CSI 300 index with positive returns over the past N days $ \text{Advancing Stocks Percentage} = \frac{\text{Number of CSI 300 stocks with returns > 0 over N days}}{\text{Total CSI 300 stocks}} $[12] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor effectively identifies market bottoms and overheated conditions but struggles to predict downturns[12] - **Factor Name**: Moving Average Sentiment Indicator **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor uses the eight moving averages of the CSI 300 index to assess market trends and sentiment[19] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Calculate the eight moving averages of the CSI 300 index (parameters: 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233)[19] 2. Assign sentiment values based on the position of the current price relative to the moving averages[19] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor provides a clear relationship between sentiment states and market trends but may lag in rapidly changing markets[19] - **Factor Name**: Fund Concentration Degree (Proxy for Fund Herding) **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor measures the degree of fund herding by analyzing the cross-sectional standard deviation of returns among concentrated fund portfolios[25] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Calculate the cross-sectional standard deviation of returns for a portfolio of concentrated funds 2. A lower standard deviation indicates higher herding, while a higher standard deviation suggests dispersion[25] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor effectively tracks changes in fund herding behavior, with higher dispersion indicating reduced herding[25] - **Factor Name**: Financial Cost Burden Ratio **Factor Construction Idea**: This factor evaluates a company's financial pressure by analyzing the ratio of interest expenses to EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes)[47] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Extract interest expenses and EBIT from the income statement 2. Calculate the financial cost burden ratio: $ \text{Financial Cost Burden Ratio} = \frac{\text{Interest Expenses}}{\text{EBIT}} $[47] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor highlights companies with high financial stress, making it a useful tool for identifying potential risks[47] Factor Backtesting Results - **Percentage of Advancing Stocks**: - Indicator value as of April 30, 2025: Below 60%, indicating a cooling market sentiment[12] - **Moving Average Sentiment Indicator**: - As of April 30, 2025: CSI 300 index in a non-prosperous sentiment zone[19] - **Fund Concentration Degree**: - As of April 30, 2025: Slight increase in dispersion, indicating reduced fund herding[25] - **Financial Cost Burden Ratio**: - Companies with ratios exceeding 10x include Liaoning Chengda, Yinbaoshanxin, Ashichuang, and others[47]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided 2. Core View of the Report - The urea market is affected by market sentiment and demand changes. The current fundamentals are weak, with supply pressure increasing as the daily production exceeds 200,000 tons, and demand showing marginal weakness. The market may experience a phased rebound when agricultural demand picks up, but there are risks of market fluctuations [1] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Strategy Analysis - The urea main contract opened and closed lower on the day, and the spot market was affected by the futures market. After the pre - holiday pre - order transactions were completed, the subsequent transactions stagnated due to the futures decline. The fundamentals remained weak, with the supply side having an increased start - up rate and some factories planning to resume production after the May Day holiday. The demand side saw improved transactions after the futures rebounded yesterday, but with the holiday stocking almost over and the decline of the futures today, it is expected that tomorrow's transactions will be weak. Some agricultural dealers started low - price stocking, but the demand from compound fertilizer factories was the main factor. The raw material urea inventory in factories was not under great pressure, and the start - up load declined. The summer fertilizer demand after the holiday would have limited incremental demand for urea. Agricultural demand was expected to relieve supply pressure in May [1] Futures and Spot Market Conditions - **Futures**: The urea main 2509 contract opened and closed lower at 1770 yuan/ton and finally closed at 1735 yuan/ton, with a decline of 2.09%. The daily trading volume increased, and the open interest was 210,028 lots (+4,562 lots). Among the top 20 main positions, long positions increased by 3,932 lots and short positions increased by 2,427 lots. Specifically, CITIC Futures' net long positions increased by 7,884 lots, Zhongtai Futures' net long positions increased by 2,770 lots, Guotai Junan's net short positions increased by 7,064 lots, and Galaxy Futures' net short positions decreased by 3,971 lots [2] - **Spot**: On April 29, 2025, the urea warehouse receipt quantity was 4,999, unchanged from the previous trading day. The spot market transactions improved due to the futures rebound yesterday, but then stagnated. The ex - factory prices of urea factories in Shandong, Henan, and Hebei were mostly in the range of 1,750 - 1,780 yuan/ton, with an increase of 10 - 20 yuan/ton. The price of small - particle urea in Shanxi was 1,680 - 1,710 yuan/ton, and the quoted price of large - particle urea was mostly 1,720 - 1,760 yuan/ton, and local factories had good order receipts yesterday [3][5] Fundamental Tracking - **Basis**: The mainstream spot market quotation was stable, and the futures closing price declined. Based on Shandong, the basis widened compared to the previous trading day, and the basis of the September contract was 85 yuan/ton (+66 yuan/ton) [8] - **Supply Data**: On April 29, 2025, the national daily urea production was 203,600 tons, unchanged from yesterday, and the start - up rate was 87.28% [10]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint indicates that recent gold price movements are influenced by geopolitical factors, monetary policy, and market sentiment, with a short-term outlook leaning towards a bearish trend and potential technical corrections [1] Group 2 - Short-term trend analysis shows that gold prices have retreated from a historical high of $3500, with daily charts displaying a "shooting star" pattern and weekly declines exceeding 1%, suggesting short-term downward pressure [3] - A key support level is identified at $3260; if this level is breached, the bearish trend may strengthen, potentially leading to further declines to $3221 or even $3100 [3] Group 3 - Market sentiment has cooled due to easing tensions in US-China trade relations and signs of progress in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has reduced the demand for gold as a safe haven [4] - Profit-taking has increased as gold prices have fallen from their highs, contributing to short-term volatility [5] Group 4 - Mid-term risks include geopolitical uncertainties, with fluctuating statements from Trump regarding tariffs and the independence of the Federal Reserve, alongside escalating global trade risks, which could trigger renewed safe-haven demand [6] - The interplay between expectations of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and a strengthening dollar may diminish gold's appeal to overseas buyers, thereby suppressing prices [7] - There is a risk of technical breakdown if the $3260 support level is lost, which could lead to significant selling pressure and increased correction magnitude [8] Group 5 - Short-term trading strategy suggests focusing on buying during pullbacks and selling during rebounds, with resistance levels at $3343-$3353 and support levels at $3300-$3290 [9] - For medium to long-term positioning, adjustments should be made based on geopolitical developments and Federal Reserve policy signals, with a recommendation to consider reducing positions for risk management if the $3260 level is breached [10]

A. 恐慌抛售怕被套牢 B. 逢低加仓期待反弹 C. 不知所措观望等待 亲爱的鹏友们： 展信佳！第二封信我们初步认识了"牛市也会有回撤"。 我们回归到实战操作，当你的持仓市值一周内回落 15%，你会： 正确答案取决于：这到底是上涨路途的中场休息，还是盛宴结束？ 识别市场位置需要跳出情 绪干扰，借助成体系的指标工具进行理性诊断。今天，我们将以 A 股历史为参照， 分析各指标工具和市场表现的关系，帮助大家在波动行情中找到自己的锚点。 估值信号灯：低买高卖的标尺 市盈率（PE）分位数是判断市场估值水位的常用指标。2007 年全市场 PE 突破 70 倍（历史分位数 98%）， 2015 年创业板 PE 达 145 倍（分位数 99%），均构成显著泡沫特征。 我们可根据指数的估值历史百分位划分状态，再根据估值状态来辅助决定买入、持有或卖出。比如： 低于25%——低估 介于25%和75%之间——适中 高于75%——高估 当前数据：全 A 指数 PE18 倍，处于近十年 34% 分位，沪深 300 指数 PE12 倍（分位数 39%），中证 500 指 数 PE27 倍（分位数 39%），整体估值处于适中区间，未现系统性 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent volatility in the gold market is driven by various factors, including U.S. economic data and geopolitical tensions, highlighting the importance of maintaining a long-term investment perspective in the face of short-term fluctuations [3][4]. Market Dynamics - Gold serves as both a safe-haven asset and a barometer for the U.S. dollar, with recent price movements reflecting the tug-of-war between positive U.S. economic indicators and concerns over financial stability [3]. - Strong employment data in the U.S. raised expectations for continued interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, leading to a temporary decline in gold prices due to increased opportunity costs associated with holding gold [3]. - Subsequent concerns about the U.S. banking system and ongoing geopolitical issues in regions like the Middle East and Eastern Europe reignited demand for gold as a safe-haven asset, causing price fluctuations [3]. Long-term Investment Perspective - The current economic environment remains uncertain, with debates over whether the global economy is experiencing a "soft landing" or a "hard landing," making gold's role as a hedge against uncertainty particularly relevant [4]. - Historically, gold prices tend to rise as the Federal Reserve approaches the end of its interest rate hike cycles, suggesting potential long-term investment opportunities in gold [4]. - Investors are encouraged to focus on two key factors: the trajectory of U.S. real interest rates, which influences gold's mid-term valuation, and the evolving global geopolitical and economic landscape, which affects long-term demand for gold [4].

广发早知道-汇总版 投资咨询业务资格： 广发期货研究所 电 话：020-88830760 E-Mail：zhaoliang@gf.com.cn 目录： 金融衍生品： 金融期货： 股指期货、国债期货 贵金属： 黄金、白银 集运指数 商品期货： 有色金属： 铜、锌、镍、不锈钢、锡、碳酸锂 黑色金属： 钢材、铁矿石、焦煤、焦炭、铁合金 农产品： 张晓珍（投资咨询资格：Z0003135） 电话：020- 88818009 邮箱：zhangxiaozhen@gf.com.cn 刘珂（投资咨询资格：Z0016336） 电话：020-88818026 邮箱：qhliuke@gf.com.cn 叶倩宁（投资咨询资格：Z0016628） 电话：020- 88818017 邮箱：yeqianning@gf.com.cn 周敏波（投资咨询资格：Z0010559） 电话：020-81868743 邮箱：zhoumingbo@gf.com.cn 油脂、粕类、玉米、生猪、白糖、棉花、鸡蛋、花生、红枣、苹果 能源化工： 原油、PTA、乙二醇、苯乙烯、短纤、尿素、瓶片、烧碱、PVC、LLDPE、 PP 特殊商品： 橡胶、玻璃纯碱、工业硅、多 ...

股市潜在风险提示： 截至2025年4月20日，中泰资管风险系统对各大资本市场的系统评分情况如下： 沪深300指数的中泰资管风险系统评分为45.53，较上月47.51略有下降，市场情绪出现一定波动，整体风险 评分仍处于中等偏低风险区间。 沪深300估值较上月有所下降（本月38.93，上月45.01），显示出市场整体估值水平有所回落。从行业分布 来看，部分前期估值较高的行业如电子、计算机等，估值有所调整，而部分防御性板块或低估值板块的估 值相对稳定。 行业间估值分化有所减小。 目前，28个申万一级行业中钢铁、房地产、国防军工、计算机 的行业估值高于历史60%分位数；农林牧渔、纺织服装、公共事业、非银金融等行业的估值低于历史10% 分位数。 市场整体估值的调整，有超预期的关税冲击的影响，也反映了市场对经济复苏节奏和企业盈利 预期的重新评估。 市场预期分数较上月有所下降（本月48.00，上月56.00）。分析师认为，政策层面持续发力，财政政策和 货币政策协同配合，为经济复苏提供了有力支持。财政方面，当月地方基建支出有所改善，土地市场的恢 复虽不均衡，但政府债发行提速，继续支撑政府性基金支出。预计二季度财政仍将保持积极 ...

截至2025年4月20日，中泰资管风险系统对各大资本市场的系统评分情况如下： 沪深300指数的中泰资管风险系统评分为45.53，较上月47.51略有下降，市场情绪出现一定波动，整体风险 评分仍处于中等偏低风险区间。 沪深300估值较上月有所下降（本月38.93，上月45.01），显示出市场整体估值水平有所回落。从行业分布 来看，部分前期估值较高的行业如电子、计算机等，估值有所调整，而部分防御性板块或低估值板块的估 值相对稳定。 行业间估值分化有所减小。 目前，28个申万一级行业中钢铁、房地产、国防军工、计算机 的行业估值高于历史60%分位数；农林牧渔、纺织服装、公共事业、非银金融等行业的估值低于历史10% 分位数。 市场整体估值的调整，有超预期的关税冲击的影响，也反映了市场对经济复苏节奏和企业盈利 预期的重新评估。 市场预期分数较上月有所下降（本月48.00，上月56.00）。分析师认为，政策层面持续发力，财政政策和 货币政策协同配合，为经济复苏提供了有力支持。财政方面，当月地方基建支出有所改善，土地市场的恢 复虽不均衡，但政府债发行提速，继续支撑政府性基金支出。预计二季度财政仍将保持积极。但全球经济 复苏的 ...

市场如果是对的，那我一定大错特错， 我觉得贸易战的影响很大，对于双方都是。 但是指数竟然能回到3300, 虽然我没有做空，但可以说是踏空！ 我不理解。 香橙柠檬 当你质疑市场的时候，他一定是对的；当你认同他的时候，他大概率是错的。就是这样反人 性，所以你要有一个标准（策略），去衡量他，而不是凭感觉去判断。 火星兔 现状是另一只手的力量很强大，扭曲了市场。但是长期看，经过充分地发酵，更多人认清事 实，还是会还原市场的本来面目。 我的教训是一定要做时间的朋友，否则即使判断正确方向，却倒在转折之前。 资水 不理解指数涨回3300，那是你的定价模型的因子不完备。 业绩预期下降，股市就一定跌么？股市定价还有其他因子啊，这轮行情至少还有政策和市场 情绪这两个因子。政策方面有GJD入场、国资股回购、机构不许抛。市场情绪方面，看到特 不靠谱的草台班子的做派，国内大部分投资者都认定西必输吧，那么大家都会在西大服软之 前抢筹。 稳若老狗 对手虚晃一枪，我们严阵以待，这次是爱国牛。 你看看集思录大佬，或者就看看实盘贴汇总，有几个人择时？ 大部分人都是长期100%仓位，没有踏空一说。 luckzpz 因为这是牛市！ 银行早就突破70 ...