Group 1 - The overall performance of credit bonds remains weak, with credit spreads showing a slight upward trend despite a balanced and loose funding environment [1][11][13] - The total market size of wealth management products reached 30.84 trillion yuan as of April 20, 2025, reflecting an increase of 1.82 trillion yuan since the end of March, indicating a significant growth compared to the same period in previous years [2][16] - Wealth management has shifted its investment direction, showing increased buying power for secondary capital bonds and commercial paper, while the buying interest for certificates of deposit has decreased [3][20] Group 2 - The demand for credit bonds is expected to improve, supported by wealth management needs and allocation forces, although the pace and types of bonds require careful consideration [4][27] - The issuance of credit bonds totaled 537.2 billion yuan during the week, with a net financing of 114.8 billion yuan, indicating a stable issuance environment [32][34] - The supply of urban investment bonds continues to be tight, with a net outflow of 409 billion yuan, reflecting a decrease in net financing compared to previous weeks [43][45]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week, the central bank achieved a net injection of 774 billion yuan, leading to a marginal easing of the capital market. The yield of the 10Y Treasury bond active bond continued to fluctuate around the 1.65% central level, pricing in an expected interest rate cut of about 30BP. The yield of the 10Y Treasury bond may still return above 1.7% this year [2][42]. - Overall, the credit spreads of various industries fluctuated slightly this week. For urban investment bonds, it is recommended to focus on short - duration moderate credit - risk exposure for coupon income and also pay attention to the convex points in the 3 - 5Y term structure to increase returns. For industrial bonds, the short - end credit spreads compressed slightly while the long - end widened slightly. It is advisable to continue to focus on high - rating short - duration industrial bonds for coupon income and increase positions on dips. For bank capital bonds, the credit spreads fluctuated slightly, with fluctuations within 3BP for different terms and ratings. It is recommended to focus on short - duration and highly liquid varieties for defense and capture the riding income at the convex points of the term structure of AA and AA+ bank secondary capital bonds [2][42]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Primary Market 3.1.1 Net Financing Scale - The net financing of credit bonds (excluding asset - backed securities) was 435.5 billion yuan this week, a week - on - week increase of 255.1 billion yuan. The total issuance was 751.5 billion yuan, up 299.4 billion yuan week - on - week, and the total repayment was 316 billion yuan, up 44.3 billion yuan week - on - week. The net financing of asset - backed securities was 36.4 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 11.3 billion yuan [6]. - By product type, the net financing of urban investment bonds was 30.1 billion yuan, a week - on - week decrease of 37.3 billion yuan; that of industrial bonds was 188.9 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 60.5 billion yuan; and that of financial bonds was 216.5 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 231.8 billion yuan [6]. 3.1.2 Issuance Cost - Except for the issuance rates of AAA financial bonds and AA+ urban investment bonds, which increased, the issuance rates of other rated credit bonds decreased to varying degrees. Specifically, the issuance rates of AA - rated urban investment bonds and industrial bonds decreased by 3BP and 12BP respectively compared with last week; the issuance rate of AA+ - rated industrial bonds decreased by 11BP; and the issuance rates of AA+ - rated urban investment bonds and AAA - rated financial bonds increased by 4BP and 7BP respectively compared with last week [14]. 3.2 Secondary Market 3.2.1 Trading Volume and Turnover - The trading volume of credit bonds (excluding asset - backed securities) decreased by 11.7 billion yuan week - on - week. By product type, the trading volume of urban investment bonds was 254.5 billion yuan, a week - on - week decrease of 12.3 billion yuan; that of industrial bonds was 363.9 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 6.4 billion yuan; and that of financial bonds was 369.5 billion yuan, a week - on - week decrease of 5.8 billion yuan. The trading volume of asset - backed securities was 2.11 billion yuan, a week - on - week decrease of 0.2 billion yuan [15]. - The turnover rate of credit bonds fluctuated slightly compared with last week. Specifically, the turnover rate of urban investment bonds was 1.62%, a week - on - week decrease of 0.08 percentage points; that of industrial bonds was 2.16%, a week - on - week increase of 0.01 percentage points; that of financial bonds was 2.64%, a week - on - week decrease of 0.07 percentage points; and that of asset - backed securities was 0.61%, a week - on - week decrease of 0.09 percentage points [16]. 3.2.2 Yield - The yields of credit bonds with different terms and ratings increased to varying degrees this week. In AA+ - rated credit bonds, the yields of 7 - 10Y and over 10Y increased by more than 5BP; in AAA - rated credit bonds, the yield of 7 - 10Y increased by more than 5BP. Except for the yield of AA+ credit bonds below 1Y, which decreased by less than 1BP compared with last week, the yields of other term and rating credit bonds increased by no more than 5BP [20][21]. 3.2.3 Credit Spreads - The credit spreads of various industries fluctuated slightly this week. In AA - rated credit bonds, the industry credit spreads of non - bank finance and public utilities widened by 7BP and 5BP respectively compared with last week; in AA+ - rated credit bonds, the industry credit spreads of electronics and pharmaceutical biology widened by 7BP and 5BP respectively; in AAA - rated credit bonds, the industry credit spreads of leisure services, national defense and military industry, household appliances, and automobiles widened by 5BP, 5BP, 6BP, and 5BP respectively. In addition, the credit spread of the AA+ chemical industry narrowed by 5BP, and that of the AAA real estate industry narrowed by 7BP. The credit spreads of different ratings in other industries fluctuated by less than 5BP compared with last week [24]. - **Urban Investment Bonds**: The credit spreads of urban investment bonds widened this week, with the long - end widening more than the short - end. By region, the credit spreads of urban investment bonds in most regions widened, while those in a few regions narrowed slightly. The top five regions with the highest credit spreads of AA - rated, AA+ - rated, and AAA - rated urban investment bonds were listed respectively [28][29]. - **Industrial Bonds**: The credit spreads of industrial bonds showed a pattern of slight compression at the short - end and slight widening at the long - end this week. It is recommended to continue to focus on high - rating short - duration industrial bonds for coupon income and increase positions on dips [32]. - **Bank Capital Bonds**: The credit spreads of bank capital bonds fluctuated slightly this week, with fluctuations within 3BP for different terms and ratings. The overall pattern was slight compression at the short - end and slight widening at the long - end. It is recommended to focus on short - duration and highly liquid varieties for defense and capture the riding income at the convex points of the term structure [36]. 3.3 This Week's Bond Market Public Opinions - On March 28, 2025, AVIC Industry Finance Holdings Co., Ltd. announced its plan to delist from the Shanghai Stock Exchange and transfer to the National Equities Exchange and Quotations. This led to a downgrade of the implied ratings of a total of 65 bonds issued by AVIC Industry Finance and its subsidiaries [40]. - Other negative public opinions included the downgrade of the implied ratings of "17 Chaoyang Bank Secondary" and "16 Chaoyang Bank Secondary" issued by Chaoyang Bank Co., Ltd., the extension of "20 Tianqian 02" issued by Hubei Tianqian Asset Management Co., Ltd., and the extension of "H20 Xinyuan 1" and "H21 Xinyuan 1" issued by Xinyuan (China) Real Estate Co., Ltd. [2][44].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Credit bond yields have followed the upward trend, and credit spreads have slightly widened again. This week, interest rates have generally fluctuated upward, and credit bond yields have generally followed suit. Except for the AA- credit bonds with 1Y and 5Y tenors, the spreads of other varieties have rebounded [2][5]. - The spreads of urban investment bonds have increased, with higher-grade varieties showing a relatively larger increase. This week, the spreads of urban investment bonds have generally increased, with the spreads of external subject-rated AAA platforms increasing by 3BP, and those of AA+ and AA platforms increasing by 1BP [2][9]. - The spreads of industrial bonds have diverged, and the spreads of private real estate bonds have continued to rise. This week, the spreads of central and state-owned enterprise real estate bonds have slightly increased by 2 - 3BP, the spreads of mixed-ownership real estate bonds have significantly decreased by 124BP, and the spreads of private real estate bonds have increased by 44BP [2][18]. - The spreads of secondary perpetual bonds have adjusted slightly upward, with a slightly higher increase in the 3 - 5Y tenors. This week, secondary perpetual bonds have adjusted, and their spreads have slightly increased, with a relatively higher increase in the 3 - 5Y tenors [2][27]. - The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds have basically remained flat, while the excess spreads of urban investment perpetual bonds have increased. This week, the excess spreads of industrial AAA3Y perpetual bonds have slightly increased by 0.01BP to 9.21BP, and those of urban investment AAA3Y and AAA5Y perpetual bonds have increased [2][29]. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs I. Credit Bond Yields Follow the Upward Trend, and Credit Spreads Slightly Widen Again - Interest rates have generally fluctuated upward. The yields of 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y China Development Bank bonds have increased by 2BP, 3BP, 1BP, and 2BP respectively, while the yield of 1Y bonds has remained basically the same as last week [5]. - Credit bond yields have generally followed the upward trend. The yield of 1Y AA- credit bonds has decreased by 1BP, while the yields of other varieties have increased by 2BP; the yields of 3Y credit bonds of all grades have increased by 5 - 6BP; the yields of 5Y AAA and AA- credit bonds have increased by 1 - 3BP, and those of AA+ and AA varieties have increased by 5 - 6BP; the yields of 7Y credit bonds of all grades have increased by 3 - 4BP; the yields of 10Y bonds of all grades have increased by 5 - 6BP [5]. - Credit spreads have shown a mixed trend. Except for the slightly decreased spreads of 1Y and 5Y AA- credit bonds, the spreads of other varieties have rebounded. The spreads of 1Y AA- credit bonds have decreased by 1BP, while those of other varieties have increased by 2BP; the spreads of 3Y credit bonds of all grades have increased by 3 - 4BP; the spreads of 5Y AA- varieties have decreased by 2BP, while those of other varieties have increased by 1 - 3BP; the spreads of 7Y bonds of all grades have increased by 2 - 3BP; the spreads of 10Y bonds of all grades have increased by 3 - 4BP [5]. - Rating spreads and term spreads have shown a divergent trend. Most rating spreads have slightly decreased, and term spreads have shown different trends among different grades and tenors [5]. II. The Spreads of Urban Investment Bonds Increase, with Higher-Grade Varieties Showing a Relatively Larger Increase - Overall, the spreads of urban investment bonds have increased. The spreads of external subject-rated AAA platforms have increased by 3BP, and those of AA+ and AA platforms have increased by 1BP [9]. - Provincial AAA platform spreads: Most have increased by 1 - 3BP, with Tianjin, Xinjiang, and Shanxi increasing by 4 - 5BP [9]. - AA+ platform spreads: Most have increased by 0 - 1BP, with Jilin and Guizhou increasing by 8BP, and Yunnan, Heilongjiang, and Shaanxi decreasing by 5BP, 2BP, and 1BP respectively [9]. - AA platform spreads: Most have increased by 0 - 2BP, with Hunan and Liaoning increasing by 3BP, and Shaanxi and Shandong decreasing by 7BP and 3BP respectively [9]. - By administrative level: The spreads of provincial, municipal, and district-level platforms have increased by 3BP, 2BP, and 1BP respectively. Most provincial platform spreads have increased by 1 - 3BP, with Shanxi increasing by 8BP, and Shaanxi and Tianjin increasing by 5BP; most municipal platform spreads in various regions have increased by 1 - 2BP, with Jilin increasing by 7BP, and the spreads in Shanxi, Heilongjiang, Yunnan, and Guizhou decreasing by 1 - 5BP; most district-level platform spreads in various regions have remained flat or increased by 1 - 2BP, with Liaoning increasing by 3BP, Guizhou decreasing by 9BP, and Shaanxi decreasing by 4BP [15]. III. The Spreads of Industrial Bonds Diverge, and the Spreads of Private Real Estate Bonds Continue to Rise - The spreads of industrial bonds have shown a divergent trend. The spreads of central and state-owned enterprise real estate bonds have slightly increased by 2 - 3BP, the spreads of mixed-ownership real estate bonds have significantly decreased by 124BP (Vanke's spreads have decreased by 278BP), and the spreads of private real estate bonds have increased by 44BP (Longfor's spreads have decreased by 27BP, Midea Real Estate and Huafa Co., Ltd.'s spreads have remained flat, and CIFI's spreads have increased by 563BP) [18]. - The spreads of coal and steel bonds of all grades have increased by 1 - 2BP; the spreads of AAA-grade chemical bonds have decreased by 5BP, and those of AA+ have decreased by 13BP. The spreads of Shaanxi Coal have increased by 3BP, those of Jinkong Coal Industry have increased by 2BP, and those of HBIS have increased by 2BP [18]. IV. The Spreads of Secondary Perpetual Bonds Slightly Increase, with a Slightly Higher Increase in the 3 - 5Y Tenors - This week, secondary perpetual bonds have adjusted, and their spreads have slightly increased, with a relatively higher increase in the 3 - 5Y tenors. Specifically, the yields of 1Y medium- and high-grade commercial bank secondary capital bonds and perpetual bonds have increased by 0 - 1BP, the yield of AA-grade secondary capital bonds has increased by 2BP, and the spreads of 1Y secondary perpetual bonds have generally increased by 0 - 2BP. The yields of 3Y secondary capital bonds have increased by 5 - 6BP, and the spreads have increased by 3 - 4BP; the yields of 3Y AAA- and AA+-grade perpetual bonds have increased by 4BP, and that of AA has increased by 2BP, with the spreads of 3Y perpetual bonds increasing by 0 - 2BP. The yields of 5Y secondary capital bonds have increased by 4 - 5BP, and the spreads have increased by 1 - 2BP; the yields of 5Y perpetual bonds have increased by 2 - 4BP, and the spreads have increased by 0 - 2BP [27]. V. The Excess Spreads of Industrial Perpetual Bonds Basically Remain Flat, while the Excess Spreads of Urban Investment Perpetual Bonds Increase - This week, the excess spreads of industrial AAA3Y perpetual bonds have slightly increased by 0.01BP to 9.21BP, at the 9.83% quantile since 2015; the excess spreads of industrial AAA5Y perpetual bonds have remained the same as last week at 8.72BP, at the 6.53% quantile since 2015; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA3Y perpetual bonds have increased by 0.75BP to 8.99BP, at the 9.68% quantile; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA5Y perpetual bonds have increased by 1.19BP to 10.92BP, at the 10.12% quantile [29]. VI. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - The overall market credit spreads, commercial bank secondary perpetual spreads, and urban investment/industrial perpetual bond credit spreads are calculated based on ChinaBond medium- and short-term notes and ChinaBond perpetual bond data, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015; the credit spreads related to urban investment and industrial bonds are compiled and statistically analyzed by Cinda Securities R & D Center, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015 [36]. - The credit spreads of industrial and urban investment individual bonds are calculated as the individual bond's ChinaBond valuation (exercise) minus the yield to maturity of the same-term China Development Bank bond (calculated by linear interpolation method), and finally the credit spreads of the industry or regional urban investment are obtained by the arithmetic mean method [36]. - The excess spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds are calculated as the credit spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds minus the credit spreads of bank ordinary bonds of the same grade and term; the excess spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds are calculated as the credit spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds minus the credit spreads of medium-term notes of the same grade and term [37]. - Sample selection criteria: Industrial and urban investment bonds both select medium-term notes and public corporate bond samples, and exclude guaranteed bonds and perpetual bonds; if the remaining term of an individual bond is less than 0.5 years or more than 5 years, it will be excluded from the statistical sample; industrial and urban investment bonds are both externally subject-rated, while commercial banks use ChinaBond implicit bond ratings [38].

Credit Spread Performance - In March, credit bond yields generally declined, with most credit spreads narrowing, particularly in the short to medium-term [1][3] - The 1-year and 3-year credit spreads mostly contracted, while the 5-year spreads showed mixed trends, with AAA-rated spreads generally narrowing and AA+ and AA-rated spreads fluctuating [1][3] - The overall trend for credit spreads across various types of bonds indicates a steepening yield curve, particularly for AA- rated bonds [8] Industry-Specific Credit Spread Analysis Industrial Bonds - In March, AAA-rated industrial bonds saw a general contraction in credit spreads, with the real estate sector experiencing the most significant narrowing of 23.88 basis points [10][11] - Private bonds in the pharmaceutical and biological sector saw spreads widen by 5.01 basis points, while other sectors experienced a contraction [10][11] Local Government Bonds - Credit spreads for local government bonds across major ratings and maturities declined in March, with most provinces showing a narrowing trend [1][3] - Notably, the credit spreads for local government bonds in Liaoning and Inner Mongolia contracted significantly, while lower-rated bonds in provinces like Qinghai and Heilongjiang widened [1][3] Financial Bonds - The credit spreads for bank perpetual bonds contracted overall, although there was a divergence in trends among different types, with secondary capital bonds widening [1][3] - Securities company subordinated bonds and insurance company capital replenishment bonds saw their credit spreads decline across the board [1][3] Historical Context and Current Trends - As of the end of March, credit spreads for various types of bonds remained at historically low levels, particularly for public industrial and local government bonds [8][9] - The historical percentile levels for credit spreads indicate that many financial bonds are above the 30th percentile, suggesting a relatively high risk perception compared to industrial and local government bonds [8][9]

Group 1 - The credit market is experiencing structural weakness, with credit bond yields fluctuating alongside interest rates. Mid to long-term credits (3-4 years) are performing relatively well, while ultra-long credits are declining due to strong liquidity demands from institutions [1][12][38] - The buying power for ultra-long credit bonds is weakening, despite similar buying intensity compared to historical data. This is attributed to redemption disturbances leading to selling pressure, which is not sufficiently countered by returning buying power [2][19][24] - The low coupon rates of ultra-long credits (below 2.4%-2.5%) limit capital gain potential, making it difficult to engage in capital gain speculation. The ability to withstand price fluctuations is also low, with a tolerance of only 5 basis points [3][23][25] Group 2 - Short-term credits are actively traded, benefiting from their defensive characteristics and certainty. However, there is a scarcity of selling pressure due to institutions' reluctance to part with their holdings [4][31] - The 3-5 year segment of the credit curve remains steep, presenting opportunities for investors to capture yield through duration extension strategies [5][33] - The overall credit market is expected to compress spreads in the second quarter, supported by demand for wealth management products and allocation forces. Short-term credits will depend on the funding side, while long-term credits will gradually develop [6][35] Group 3 - In the primary market, the issuance of ultra-long bonds has increased, with a total issuance of 4,212 billion yuan and a net financing of 814 billion yuan. The weighted average issuance rate for credit bonds is 2.07%, remaining stable compared to the previous week [38][41] - The effective subscription multiple for credit bonds has decreased to 0.90 times, indicating weakened subscription sentiment, particularly in the short-term segment [38][42] - The ultra-long credit bonds issued during the week totaled 303 billion yuan, with some issuers offering coupon rates above 2.8% [46]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Credit bond yields increased slightly, and the credit spreads of medium - and short - term bonds declined slightly. The long - end of interest rates performed better than the short - end this week [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads generally continued to decline slightly, with the spreads of Guizhou's low - grade varieties slightly rising [2][9]. - Industrial bond spreads were relatively stable, while the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased [2][18]. - The yield curve of secondary and perpetual bonds became slightly steeper, with medium - and high - grade bonds performing better, and the spreads of 3Y medium - and high - grade secondary bonds compressed significantly [2][28]. - The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds were basically flat, while those of urban investment perpetual bonds increased [2][31]. Summary by Directory 1. Credit bond yields increased slightly, and the 3Y spreads compressed most significantly - Interest rates fluctuated within a narrow range this week, with the long - end performing better than the short - end. The yields of 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y China Development Bank bonds increased by 2BP, 3BP, and 2BP respectively, while those of 7Y and 10Y decreased by 1BP and 2BP respectively [2][5]. - Credit bond yields increased slightly overall. The yields of 1Y AA - grade and above credit bonds increased by 1 - 2BP, and the AA - grade remained the same as last week; the yields of 3Y AA and AA + grade credit bonds increased by 2 - 4BP, and the AAA and AA - varieties remained flat; the yields of 5Y AA + and above grade varieties increased by 0 - 1BP, and the AA and AA - varieties increased by 2 - 4BP; the yields of 7Y all - grade credit bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP; the yields of 10Y all - grade varieties increased by 4BP [2][5]. - In terms of credit spreads, the medium - and short - term spreads declined slightly, while those of long - term varieties increased. The spreads of 1Y AA and above varieties remained the same as last week, and the AA - spread decreased by 1BP; the spreads of 3Y AA - grade varieties remained flat, and the other varieties decreased by 1 - 4BP; the spreads of 5Y AAA and AA + grades decreased by 1 - 2BP, the AA - grade increased by 3BP, and the AA - spread remained the same as last week; the spreads of 7Y all - grade increased by 0 - 1BP; the spreads of 10Y all - grade increased by 6BP [2][5]. 2. Urban investment bond spreads declined slightly, and some weakly - qualified regions rebounded and widened - This week, the spreads of urban investment bonds continued to decline slightly. The credit spreads of externally - rated AAA and AA - grade platforms decreased by 1BP, and the spreads of AA + - grade platforms remained the same as last week [2][9]. - Among provinces, the spreads of most AAA - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Yunnan decreasing by 3BP and Gansu increasing by 2BP; the spreads of most AA + - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Tibet and Shaanxi decreasing by 3BP and 4BP respectively, and Anhui, Beijing, and Heilongjiang increasing by 1 - 2BP; the spreads of most AA - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 2BP, with Shanxi decreasing by 5BP, Gansu decreasing by 15BP, and Guizhou increasing by 5BP [2][9]. - In terms of administrative levels, the credit spreads of provincial platforms decreased by 1BP, and the spreads of prefecture - level and district - county - level platforms remained the same as last week. The spreads of most provincial platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Yunnan decreasing by 3BP; the spreads of most prefecture - level platforms in various regions decreased by 0 - 2BP, with Gansu decreasing by 15BP; the spreads of most district - county - level platforms remained flat or increased by 1BP, with Hebei and Liaoning decreasing by 3BP, Shaanxi decreasing by 4BP, and Guizhou increasing by 8BP [2][9][15]. 3. Industrial bond spreads declined overall, and the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased - Industrial bond spreads were relatively stable, while the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased. This week, the spreads of central - state - owned and local - state - owned real - estate bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP, and the spreads of mixed - ownership real - estate bonds decreased by 69BP. The spreads of private real - estate bonds increased by 14BP overall, with the spread of Longfor decreasing by 6BP, the spreads of Midea Real Estate and Huafa Co., Ltd. remaining flat, and the spread of CIFI increasing by 384BP [2][18]. - The spreads of all - grade coal bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP; the spreads of AAA - grade steel bonds remained flat; the spreads of AAA - grade chemical bonds increased by 1BP, and the AA + spreads decreased by 2BP. The spread of Shaanxi Coal Industry increased by 1BP; the spread of Jinkong Coal Industry decreased by 1BP; the spread of HBIS increased by 2BP [2][18]. 4. The yields of secondary and perpetual bonds showed a long - short differentiation, and most credit spreads declined - This week, the yield curve of secondary and perpetual bonds became slightly steeper, with medium - and high - grade bonds performing better, and the spreads of 3Y medium - and high - grade secondary bonds compressed significantly. Specifically, the yields of 1Y commercial bank secondary capital bonds decreased by 0 - 3BP, the yields of perpetual bonds decreased by 2BP, and the spreads of 1Y secondary and perpetual bonds decreased by 2 - 4BP overall [2][28]. - The yields of 3Y AAA - and AA + - grade secondary capital bonds decreased by 0 - 2BP, the AA yield increased by 1BP, and the spreads of 3Y secondary bonds decreased by 2 - 5BP; the yields of 3Y AAA - and AA + - grade perpetual bonds increased by 1BP, the spreads decreased by 2BP, the AA - grade yield increased by 4BP, and the spread increased by 1BP; the yields of 5Y commercial bank secondary capital bonds increased by 0 - 2BP, the spreads decreased by 0 - 2BP, the yields of perpetual bonds increased by 2BP, and the spreads were basically flat [2][28]. 5. The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds were basically flat, and the excess spreads of urban investment perpetual bonds increased - This week, the excess spreads of industrial AAA3Y perpetual bonds decreased slightly by 0.01BP to 9.20BP, at the 8.80% quantile since 2015; the excess spreads of industrial AAA5Y perpetual bonds remained flat at 8.72BP, at the 6.38% quantile; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA3Y perpetual bonds increased by 1.25BP to 8.24BP, at the 6.02% quantile; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA5Y perpetual bonds increased by 0.89BP to 9.73BP, at the 7.92% quantile [2][31]. 6. Credit spread database compilation instructions - The overall market credit spreads, commercial bank secondary and perpetual spreads, and the credit spreads of urban investment/industrial perpetual bonds are calculated based on the data of ChinaBond Medium - and Short - Term Notes and ChinaBond Perpetual Bonds. The historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015; the relevant credit spreads of urban investment and industrial bonds are compiled and statistically analyzed by the R & D Center of Cinda Securities, and the historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015 [38]. - The credit spreads of industrial and urban investment individual bonds = the individual bond's ChinaBond valuation (exercise) - the yield to maturity of the same - term China Development Bank bond (calculated by the linear interpolation method), and finally the credit spreads of the industry or regional urban investment are obtained by the arithmetic average method [38][39]. - The excess spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds = the credit spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds - the credit spreads of bank ordinary bonds of the same grade and term; the excess spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds = the credit spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds - the credit spreads of medium - and short - term notes of the same grade and term [39]. - Sample selection criteria: Both industrial and urban investment bonds select samples of medium - term notes and public - offering corporate bonds, and exclude guaranteed bonds and perpetual bonds; if the remaining term of an individual bond is less than 0.5 years or more than 5 years, it will be excluded from the statistical sample; industrial and urban investment bonds are externally - rated by the issuer, while commercial banks use ChinaBond's implied bond ratings [40].

Core Insights - The report suggests that credit spreads may widen in the second quarter of 2025, while extending duration remains a favorable strategy [3][26] - The overall strategy for credit bonds indicates a potential decline in yields following government bonds, but increased supply and weakened demand may lead to passive widening of credit spreads [3][26] Market Review - Since the beginning of 2025, credit bond rates have generally increased, but the rise is less than that of government bonds, resulting in a compression of credit spreads, particularly in lower-rated bonds [5][8] - The first quarter of 2025 saw a significant increase in net financing of government bonds compared to credit bonds, with the latter remaining relatively stable [14][25] Sector Strategies City Investment Bonds - Focus on opportunities for spread compression in high-quality city investment bonds from good regions, as policies are favorable for mitigating credit risks [3][51] - The new regulations from the exchange may lead to a decrease in supply of lower-rated city investment bonds, while good regional city investment bonds may see a more significant decline in supply [3][50] Industrial Bonds - Attention is drawn to the opportunities in state-owned real estate and construction bonds due to debt resolution policies, which are expected to accelerate cash flow for state-owned enterprises [3][61] - The report highlights that the safety of state-owned enterprise bonds is assured under supportive policies [3][55] Financial Bonds - The report emphasizes the potential for overall opportunities in financial bonds due to reduced supply pressure from perpetual bonds and the consolidation of rural commercial banks [3][70] - The ongoing reforms in rural commercial banks are expected to lower credit risks associated with financial bonds [3][73]

Group 1 - The report highlights that the Shanghai Stock Exchange has tightened the issuance of municipal investment bonds, making it more difficult for weaker quality issuers to finance [2][7][8] - The newly implemented guidelines include increased scrutiny on issuers with high proportions of inventory and receivables, as well as those with low EBITDA relative to interest expenses [12][8] - The special treasury bond injection into four major banks is expected to enhance their core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratios by approximately 1 percentage point, with the Agricultural Bank of China likely to receive additional support due to its lower capital adequacy [9][10] Group 2 - Credit bond yields have generally declined, with notable compressions in credit spreads across various sectors, particularly in the banking sector, which saw a reduction of 8 basis points [3][4][18] - The report indicates that the credit spreads for municipal investment bonds have also compressed, with no overdue non-standard municipal bonds reported in recent weeks [19][22] - The strategy outlook suggests focusing on short-duration opportunities as credit spreads may widen in the future due to lower supply of credit bonds compared to interest rate bonds [6][30]

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Accumulate" rating for Xiamen International Trade (600755) [1] Core Views - The company is focusing on its core supply chain management business after divesting from real estate and financial services, positioning itself to navigate through economic cycles [8][10] - The domestic bulk commodity supply chain market presents significant growth potential, with the company holding only 0.85% market share as of 2023, indicating room for expansion [9][62] - The investment logic is based on a combination of demand recovery, internal growth, and a high dividend yield, making it a balanced investment option [10] Summary by Sections Company Overview - Xiamen International Trade has transitioned from a diversified business model to a focus on supply chain management, shedding non-core assets [34][37] - The company has a stable ownership structure backed by local state-owned assets, with 35.82% of shares held by Xiamen State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission [38] Business Model - The company operates as a midstream circulation organizer with high turnover and low profit margins, leveraging its advantages in credit, capital, operations, and logistics [7][12] - The business model includes both self-operated and agency trading modes, with revenue primarily generated from the sale of goods [18] Financial Performance - The company’s revenue and profit growth rates are positioned in the upper-middle tier of the industry, with stable ROE and net profit margins [55][56] - Revenue projections for 2024 to 2026 are estimated at CNY 389.05 billion, CNY 404.61 billion, and CNY 418.84 billion, with corresponding net profits of CNY 1.22 billion, CNY 1.61 billion, and CNY 2.09 billion [10] Market Position - Xiamen International Trade is a leading player in the domestic bulk commodity supply chain, particularly strong in metals and paper products [42][43] - The company’s market share in key categories like steel, iron ore, and copper ranks among the top in the industry [43] Growth Strategy - The company is pursuing a dual growth strategy of horizontal expansion into new product categories and vertical integration along the supply chain [9][61] - The focus on emerging sectors such as health and renewable energy is part of its strategy to diversify and mitigate demand fluctuations [78]

中信建投固收｜固羽增收 - 信用性价比框架失效了吗 20250320 摘要 Q&A 当前信用债的性价比框架是否失效？ 我们认为当前的信用债性价比框架在某些情况下确实失效。尽管按照之前的性 价比框架，短端信用债已经进入了较好的投资区间，但市场环境和前提条件发 生了变化。自 2022 年起，我们观察到中短票的信用利差（3A 评级、3 年期限） 在 30 到 50BP 之间波动。然而，2024 年的市场调整显示，这一规律并不总是适 用。 • 信用利差受资产荒、流动性及风险偏好影响，2024 年公募基金增持长端信 用债，改变了市场调整模式，3-7 年期债券调整幅度超过短端，需关注资 金面和货币政策。 • 构建信贷性价比框架需满足资产荒、流动性稳定和风险偏好不变三个假设， 否则适用性受限。当前利率债供给增加，传统信用利差配置区间逻辑可能 变化。 • 股市与理财产品存在互动，散户资金流向影响债市，需关注市场分化。广 义基金仓位平衡时应防守，仓位低则需配置，关注资金面和货币政策。 • 2025 年初专项债发行扰动市场，央行紧平衡操作并引导资金中枢偏高运行， 需关注银行态度及其引导方式，而非简单解读为阶段性扰动。 • 当前资 ...