Workflow
收益
icon
Search documents
主动优选2025年来超额表现好,因为啥呢?
银行螺丝钉· 2025-07-14 13:59
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of the "Active Selection" strategy compared to the CSI 300 index and other equity fund indices, highlighting its ability to generate excess returns in most years since its inception, particularly noting a recovery in 2025 after underperforming in 2024 [1][2][36]. Performance Summary - As of June 30, 2025, the Active Selection strategy achieved a 5.46% excess return compared to the CSI 300 index [1]. - The performance of the Active Selection strategy since its inception shows that it outperformed the CSI 300 and the equity fund index in most years, particularly excelling during the bull market from 2020 to 2021 [4][8]. - Yearly performance data indicates that in 2020, the Active Selection strategy rose by 65.78%, outperforming the CSI 300 by 24.49% and the equity fund index by 5.61% [7][4]. 2024 Underperformance Analysis - In 2024, the Active Selection strategy increased by 6.56%, but underperformed the CSI 300, which rose by 14.68%, resulting in an 8.12% shortfall [11][12]. - The underperformance in 2024 is attributed to market style shifts, particularly a surge in small-cap and loss-making stocks, which the Active Selection strategy does not engage with [14][23]. Investment Strategy Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of investing in companies with strong profitability, as measured by Return on Equity (ROE), and categorizes companies into three groups based on their ROE [15][18]. - The strategy focuses on high-quality stocks, avoiding speculative investments in loss-making companies, which led to its relative underperformance during periods of "speculative trading" in 2024 [23][34]. - Long-term investment in high-performing stocks is advocated, aligning with the principle that stock prices ultimately reflect the underlying company's value over time [37][38].
美国国债收益率转为下行,10年期收益率现小幅下跌至4.411%。
news flash· 2025-07-14 13:47
美国国债收益率转为下行,10年期收益率现小幅下跌至4.411%。 ...
中证商品期货指数窄幅震荡:中证商品期货指数上半年评论
Zhao Shang Qi Huo· 2025-07-14 12:40
1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In H1 2025, the commodity market showed a narrow - range oscillation, with the CSI Commodity Futures Index rising slightly by 0.20%. Positive returns mainly came from gold, silver, and copper, while negative returns were mainly from rebar, rubber, and soda ash [2]. - The CSI Commodity Index's year - on - year sequence has bottomed out and rebounded, potentially indicating that the PPI sequence is in the process of bottoming out and rebounding. Microscopically, the sector index trends reflect certain operational pressures in the steel and chemical industries [2]. - Investors should gradually reduce their reliance on fixed - income assets and practice the methodology of stock - bond - commodity asset allocation, increasing the proportion of commodities in the portfolio [2]. - The CSI Commodity Index has shown a relatively independent and excellent performance compared to overseas indices, but the recent increase in correlation needs attention. Adding an appropriate amount of commodities to the traditional stock - commodity portfolio can significantly improve the return - risk ratio of the portfolio [2]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Market Review - In H1 2025, the commodity market presented a narrow - range oscillation. The CSI Commodity Index rose slightly by 0.20% annually, with an amplitude of only 10.27%. It was difficult to form a long - term trend, showing an inverted V - shaped oscillation after a strong start [9]. - Driven by frequent macro - events, the commodity market was repeatedly disturbed by policies and geopolitics. With the global economy still bottoming out, the demand side was weak, especially for industrial products. Three macro black - swan events occurred in H1 [12][14]. - There were two obvious characteristics in the commodity market: the significant differentiation between agricultural and industrial products, and the further differentiation within commodities due to different types of event shocks [15]. 3.2 Index Return Attribution 3.2.1 Roll Yield Contribution - The roll yield in H1 2025 was positive overall, at 1.07%, an improvement compared to 2024, possibly suggesting that the global economic growth is bottoming out. Most months had positive roll yields, except for March which had a large negative value [20]. 3.2.2 Sector Return Contribution - In H1 2025, the trends of industrial and agricultural products diverged. The agricultural product market had a small price increase and relatively low volatility, while the industrial product market had a large price decline and relatively large amplitude fluctuations. Agricultural products outperformed industrial products in most months [23]. 3.2.3 Variety Return Contribution - At the sector level, black and energy - chemical sectors mostly made negative return contributions, while precious metals, non - ferrous metals, and agricultural products mostly made positive return contributions. At the variety level, gold, silver, and copper had large positive return contributions, while rebar, rubber, and soda ash had large negative return contributions [24]. 3.3 Macro - Micro Representativeness 3.3.1 Macro Level: The CSI Commodity Index Leads PPI by About 2 Months - The CSI Commodity Index's year - on - year sequence is highly correlated with the PPI year - on - year and can lead by about 2 months. Recently, the commodity index's year - on - year sequence has bottomed out and rebounded, perhaps indicating that the PPI sequence is bottoming out and rebounding [25]. 3.3.2 Micro Level: The Sector Index Moves in Sync with the Industry's Total Profits - The year - on - year sequence of the sub - sector index is highly correlated with the year - on - year sequence of the corresponding industry's total profits. The energy - chemical futures index is in the process of bottoming out, and the steel futures index is still finding its bottom [29]. 3.4 Comparison of Major Asset Classes - In the long - term, the commodity market has similar returns but lower risks compared to the equity market. In H1 2025, the commodity market's risk indicators were still better than those of the equity market [38][39]. - The current risk - free interest rate is quite low, and the investment cost - performance of bonds has declined significantly. Investors should gradually practice the methodology of major asset allocation and increase the proportion of commodities in the portfolio [40]. - Since 2024, the correlation between the commodity market and the equity market has been increasing. In H1 2025, the correlation remained relatively high, but it decreased rapidly at the end of June [43]. 3.5 Comparison with Overseas Indices - In the long - term, the CSI Commodity Index has obvious advantages in both returns and risks compared to overseas mainstream commodity indices. In H1 2025, it still had better performance in risk control [47][48]. - The correlation between the CSI Commodity Index and overseas mainstream commodity indices increased rapidly in early April and remained high in Q2, mainly due to the impact of the tariff shock [50]. 3.6 Application Cases - Adding an appropriate amount of commodities to the traditional stock - commodity portfolio can significantly improve the return - risk ratio of the portfolio. Replacing half of the stocks in the traditional 40 - 60 stock - bond portfolio with commodities can significantly reduce the portfolio's volatility and drawdown while keeping the returns similar [54][60].
金溢科技:预计2025年上半年净利润亏损900万元–1200万元
news flash· 2025-07-14 12:31
金溢科技(002869)公告,2025年1月1日至2025年6月30日,预计归属于上市公司股东的净利润亏损900 万元至1200万元,上年同期为盈利1556.39万元;扣除非经常性损益后的净利润亏损1800万元至2100万 元,上年同期为盈利261.12万元;基本每股收益亏损0.05元/股至0.07元/股,上年同期为盈利0.09元/股。 报告期内,公司完成对车路通科技(成都)有限公司100%的股权收购,自2025年5月1日起车路通纳入公司 合并报表范围。业绩下滑主要由于行业竞争加剧、部分产品售价下降、综合毛利率承压以及理财产品收 益减少。 ...
美债保持稳定 投资者关注明日通胀数据
news flash· 2025-07-14 11:17
Group 1 - The core focus of the market is on the stability of the US 10-year Treasury yield, which remains around 4.42% as investors await the upcoming inflation data [1] - Analysts suggest that if the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data exceeds expectations, it could reignite market speculation regarding a more hawkish interest rate path from the Federal Reserve, potentially driving yields higher and limiting the downside for the dollar [1]
流动性和机构行为周度观察:资金面整体平稳均衡,债市杠杆率下行-20250714
Changjiang Securities· 2025-07-14 11:12
1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - From July 7 to July 11, 2025, the central bank conducted a net withdrawal of funds through 7 - day reverse repurchase operations. The liquidity remained relatively loose but showed a marginal and slight tightening trend during the week. From July 7 to July 13, the net payment of government bonds increased, most of the yields to maturity of inter - bank certificates of deposit (NCDs) rose, and the leverage ratio in the inter - bank bond market decreased. From July 14 to July 20, the expected net payment of government bonds is 405.83 billion yuan, and the maturity volume of NCDs is about 802.8 billion yuan [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Funds - **Central Bank Operations**: From July 7 to July 11, 2025, the central bank's reverse repurchase operations involved a release of 425.7 billion yuan and a withdrawal of 652.2 billion yuan, resulting in a net withdrawal of 226.5 billion yuan. From July 14 to July 18, 425.7 billion yuan of open - market reverse repurchases will mature. On July 15, 100 billion yuan of Medium - term Lending Facility (MLF) will mature, and considering the tax - payment deadline on the same day and subsequent tax - payment outflows, the central bank may conduct outright reverse repurchase operations [5]. - **Fund Rate Performance**: From July 7 to July 11, 2025, the average values of DR001 and R001 were 1.32% and 1.38% respectively, down 5.1 basis points and 19.9 basis points compared to June 30 - July 4. The average values of DR007 and R007 were 1.47% and 1.51% respectively, down 9.7 basis points and 13.2 basis points compared to June 30 - July 4. The significant decline in the weekly average of fund rates was mainly due to the cross - quarter effect in the previous week. Since July, the funds have been generally stable and loose, but in mid - July, affected by the upcoming tax - payment outflows, the fund rates increased slightly. On July 11, DR001 was 1.34%, about 3 basis points higher than on July 7 [6]. - **Government Bond Net Payment**: From July 7 to July 13, 2025, the net payment of government bonds was about 251.1 billion yuan, an increase of about 217 billion yuan compared to June 30 - July 6. Among them, the net financing of treasury bonds was about 139.9 billion yuan, and that of local government bonds was about 111.2 billion yuan. From July 14 to July 20, the expected net payment of government bonds is 405.83 billion yuan, including about 276.05 billion yuan of net treasury bond financing and about 129.78 billion yuan of net local government bond financing [7]. 3.2 Inter - bank Certificates of Deposit (NCDs) - **Yield to Maturity**: As of July 11, 2025, the yields to maturity of 1 - month, 3 - month, and 1 - year NCDs were 1.5195%, 1.5600%, and 1.6303% respectively, up 2, 3, and 4 basis points compared to July 4, 2025. During the week, as the funds tightened marginally, the primary issuance price of NCDs increased, and the secondary yields rose [8]. - **Net Financing and Issuance Rate**: From July 7 to July 13, 2025, the net financing of NCDs was about - 8.34 billion yuan, compared with about - 0.28 billion yuan from June 29 to July 6. From July 14 to July 20, the expected maturity repayment of NCDs is 802.8 billion yuan, with an increased roll - over pressure compared to the previous week. On July 11, 2025, the issuance rates of 1 - year NCDs for state - owned large - scale banks and joint - stock banks were 1.62% and 1.63% respectively, up from 1.59% on July 4 [8]. 3.3 Institutional Behavior - **Leverage Ratio in the Inter - bank Bond Market**: From July 7 to July 11, 2025, the average calculated leverage ratio in the inter - bank bond market was 108.18%, compared with 108.53% from June 30 to July 4. On July 11 and July 4, the calculated leverage ratios in the inter - bank bond market were about 107.86% and 108.58% respectively [9].
每周经济观察第28期:WEI指数上行至7%左右-20250714
Huachuang Securities· 2025-07-14 10:15
Economic Indicators - The Huachuang Macro WEI index rose to 7.08% as of July 6, 2025, up from 6.00% on June 29, marking an increase of 1.08%[2] - Domestic flight executions increased to 14,400 flights in the first five days of July, a year-on-year increase of 3%[8] - The operating rate of asphalt plants rose to 32.7% as of July 9, 2025, a year-on-year increase of 4.7%[15] Consumer Trends - Retail sales of passenger cars showed a year-on-year increase of 1% as of July 6, down from 3% previously, and June's total was 15%[8] - The sales area of commercial residential properties in 67 cities decreased by 24% year-on-year in the first 11 days of July, compared to a 17.6% decline in June[3] - The land premium rate fell to 4.88% as of July 6, down from 5.47% in June[9] Price Movements - Resource prices continued to rise, with Shanxi thermal coal prices increasing by 1.4%, and rebar prices in Shanghai rising by 1.9%[46] - The national average price of second-hand homes fell by 0.3% as of June 30, with first-tier cities down by 0.2%[47] - The overall price index for agricultural products rose, with vegetable prices increasing by 1.8% and fruit prices by 2.1%[46] Debt and Interest Rates - New special bond issuance accelerated, with 2.39 trillion yuan issued this year, achieving 54.3% of the annual target, compared to 39.3% last year[54] - As of July 11, 2025, the yields on 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year government bonds were 1.3702%, 1.5292%, and 1.6653%, respectively, reflecting increases of 3.4bps, 3.63bps, and 2.2bps from the previous week[67]
非美货币被动升值风险需警惕
Jing Ji Wang· 2025-07-14 10:05
Core Viewpoint - The significant decline of the US dollar index, which has dropped over 10% this year, has led to substantial appreciation of several non-USD currencies, raising concerns about the underlying economic fundamentals driving these changes [1][3]. Group 1: Reasons for Dollar Decline - Domestic political factors in the US have undermined the perceived independence of the Federal Reserve, contributing to the dollar's decline [3]. - The relative decrease in returns on US assets has made them less attractive compared to international markets, with major US stock indices underperforming compared to European and Asian markets [3][4]. - A diversification of global capital flows away from USD assets has been observed, with a net outflow of $14.2 billion from US securities and banks in April 2025 [4]. - Decreased confidence in US assets due to fiscal imbalances and sustainability issues has led to higher risk premiums, further diminishing the dollar's appeal [4]. Group 2: Economic Indicators - The US economy has shown signs of a reversal in expectations, with a reported GDP contraction of 0.5% in Q1 2025 and a downward revision of GDP growth forecast to 1.4% [5]. - The significant appreciation of other currencies is not driven by their economic fundamentals, but rather reflects the dollar's weakness, which could negatively impact exports for those economies facing dual pressures from tariffs and currency appreciation [5].
当被动已成信仰,主动正用超额收益为自己正名
雪球· 2025-07-14 08:25
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the unexpected strong performance of actively managed funds in the first half of 2025, outperforming passive funds by nearly 5 percentage points, suggesting a resurgence in the credibility of active fund managers [3][5]. Group 1: Performance of Active Funds - In the first half of 2025, 50 actively managed funds achieved net value returns exceeding 30%, with the top ten funds all surpassing 60% gains, outperforming the best-performing passive ETF, which had a return of 58.76% [12][14]. - Among the top-performing active funds, Guangfa Fund led with 9 funds, followed by Penghua, Changcheng, Huitianfu, and Fuguo, each with 6 funds [14][15]. Group 2: Opportunities in Emerging Markets - The article identifies the Beijing Stock Exchange (北交所) as a "golden opportunity" for active funds, where less transparent information and lower research coverage allow for better identification of mispriced opportunities, thus creating alpha (excess returns) [16][18]. - The North Star 50 Index, a benchmark for the Beijing Stock Exchange, has seen a year-to-date increase of over 30%, significantly outperforming the Zhongzheng 2000 index [18][21]. Group 3: Value of Active Management - The true value of active management lies in the ability to dynamically search for undervalued opportunities across the entire market, rather than being confined to specific industries or styles, which is a key advantage over passive investment strategies [22][24]. - The article emphasizes that while passive funds are effective for obtaining market average returns (beta), allocating a portion of investments to capable active fund managers can yield excess returns (alpha) [25][26].
利率择时策略研究系列之四:久期轮动策略创新及债券ETF组合应用
Group 1 - The report highlights the rapid development of bond ETFs since 2018, which have become an important tool for fixed income asset allocation, improving the performance of fixed income portfolios [2][56]. - The duration rotation strategy is based on the signal value of implied interest rates from government bond futures, which is used for duration allocation and bond ETF combinations [2][56]. - Backtesting of the duration rotation strategy applied to bond indices shows that the index combinations outperform the benchmark, with annualized returns exceeding the benchmark by 29 basis points for the conservative weight combination and 60 basis points for the aggressive weight combination [2][56]. Group 2 - The report discusses the application of the duration rotation strategy to government bond ETF combinations, indicating that the returns significantly exceed the benchmark, with annualized returns exceeding the benchmark by 82 basis points for the conservative weight combination and 102 basis points for the aggressive weight combination [2][56]. - Yearly comparisons show that the duration rotation strategy can achieve substantial excess returns even in volatile market conditions [2][56]. - The report emphasizes that the risk parameters of the duration rotation strategy are comparable to the benchmark, indicating a balanced risk-return profile [2][56]. Group 3 - The report outlines the historical development of bond ETFs, noting that the first bond ETF was launched in 2013, and the market has seen significant growth since 2018 due to favorable market conditions [7][14]. - The advantages of bond ETFs are highlighted, including low interest rates, low volatility, and the flexibility of trading, redemption, and collateralization [11][14]. - The report provides a detailed analysis of the duration rotation strategy, including the methodology for generating long and short signals based on implied interest rates and market conditions [24][30]. Group 4 - The report presents the performance of different duration bond ETFs, indicating that ETFs with similar durations and bond types tend to perform consistently [51]. - The backtesting period for the bond ETF duration rotation strategy is set from September 2020 to July 2025, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of performance [52]. - The report concludes with a summary of the findings, reiterating the effectiveness of the duration rotation strategy in enhancing returns while maintaining comparable risk levels [53][56].