Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that Return on Equity (ROE) is a more critical indicator for stock selection than growth, as highlighted by Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger in their shareholder letters [2][3]. Group 1: Importance of ROE - Companies that can maintain high ROE typically possess long-term competitive advantages, often referred to as "moats," which are essential for future performance [3]. - From a practical investment perspective, in the absence of secondary market pricing, the only goal for shareholders is the return on equity, which will approximate the long-term return rate [3]. - The notion that a lack of growth leads to stagnant stock valuations overlooks the fact that sustainable competitive advantages make it difficult for companies to remain stagnant [3][4]. Group 2: Growth and Valuation - Even in industries perceived to be stagnant, such as liquor and home appliances, companies like Moutai and Meidi have continued to achieve growth and increasing profits over the past decade [3][4]. - The existence of an enduring industry allows for moderate growth driven by improved production efficiency and inflation, which benefits companies in competitive positions [4]. - The ability to predict high growth is complex, as past performance does not guarantee future results, and many high-growth companies have faced sudden downturns [4]. Group 3: Pricing and Investment Strategy - The key to profitability is not merely the increase in valuation but the price at which investments are made; for instance, Gree's PE ratio increased from 6x in 2014 to 17x in 2018, demonstrating that low growth can still yield significant returns if purchased at a low price [5]. - Long-term holders of companies like Moutai have achieved returns close to the net asset return rate, despite the company never trading at 1x PB, indicating that brand and market position are critical value drivers not reflected on the balance sheet [7][8]. - High growth does not always correlate with high ROE, as many companies pursuing aggressive growth strategies do not achieve favorable economic outcomes [8].

特朗普再度挥动关税大棒， 威胁对欧盟商品征收50%关税，此外，特朗普还点名苹果和三星，表示 对不在美国生产的手机制造商征收25%的关 税，并称 将在六月底前对苹果公司和三星征收关税。 此言论也在欧洲金融市场引发震荡，重要股指纷纷下挫。 关税担忧再起，周五美股也全线下挫， 截至收盘，道指跌0.61%，纳指跌1.00%，标普 500指数跌0.67%。 本周，道指累计跌2.47%，标普500指数跌2.61%，纳斯达克指数跌2.48%。 | A HS 港股 | 美股 全球 | 某余 | 期货 曲家 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 亚太市场收盘 | 欧洲市场收盘 | | 北美市场收盘 | | * 恒生指数 | 疆 英国富时 | | ■ 道琼斯 | | 23601.26 | 8718.27 | | 41603.07 | | +56.95 +0.24% | -20.99 -0.24% | | -256.02 -0.61% | | · 上证指数 | 德国DAX | | ■ 纳斯达克 | | 3348.37 | 23623.82 | | 18737.21 | | -31.82 -0.94% | -3 ...

以下文章来源于二马由之 ，作者二马由之 二马由之 . 用逻辑讲投资 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者： 二马由之 来源：雪球 价值投资者应该何时卖出股票呢 ？ 常规的说法是 1 、 涨多了 ， 股票贵了 ， 因此高抛 ； 3 、 公司基本面有超预期的负面变化 ， 因此卖出 。 俗称割肉 。 那么价值投资会不会因为公司股票下跌而止损呢 ？ 是否因为股票下跌而选择止损一直是区分价值 投资和非价值投资的一个重要标准 。 这里我说一个观点 ， 价值投资者只割肉不止损 。 趋势投资者 ， 技术分析者会因为股票下跌而卖出 ， 这本身是他们投资体系的一部分 。 因此 ， 这类投资者因为下跌而止损是很正常的行为 。 但是价值投资的底层逻辑是低买 ， 高卖 。 因此 ， 因为股票下跌了 ， 更便宜了而卖出是违背了 价值投资的基本原则的 。 那么价值投资者能不能因为股票下跌 ， 而不是基本面恶化卖出股票呢 ？ 能 。 对于价值投资者来 说 ， 这个行为叫做割肉 。 价值投资者为什么会因为股票下跌 ， 而非基本面变化而割肉呢 ？ 其原因是 ， 当股票上涨时 ， 一些人认为自 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the benefits of systematic investment plans (SIPs) or dollar-cost averaging, arguing that it helps manage investment risks and emotions during market fluctuations [2][5][22]. Group 1: Problems Addressed by SIPs - SIPs allow investors to buy regardless of market price fluctuations, preventing the pitfalls of trying to time the market [5][6]. - Investors often hesitate to buy during market downturns, leading to missed opportunities and potential losses [9][12]. - SIPs help manage emotional responses to market volatility, reducing the likelihood of making impulsive decisions during market lows [13][14]. Group 2: Personal Investment Experience - The author shares personal experiences with SIPs, highlighting a case where the investment initially faced a -24% loss but later recovered to -2.9% due to continued investments during market lows [15][19]. - The article discusses specific funds, such as the Huatai-PB Southeast Asia Technology ETF and Manulife India Equity Fund, showcasing their performance and recovery from losses [16][20]. Group 3: Importance of Selecting the Right Assets - The article stresses the necessity of choosing long-term upward-trending assets for SIPs to ensure positive outcomes over time [22][24]. - Historical examples, such as gold and the Nasdaq 100 index, illustrate that long-term investments can yield profits even when purchased at market peaks [26][27]. Group 4: Investment Philosophy - Viewing SIPs as a method of accumulating wealth rather than short-term trading can enhance commitment to the investment strategy [28].

对于港股大模型，杜厚良认为，从长期来看， AI有望在本质上改变移动互联网的入口。通过AI技 术的普及应用，移动互联网现有的分配方式或将发生较大转变。 当硅基代码叩响文明之门，当智能浪潮重塑人类想象， AI浪潮正以前所未有的 速度改变着人类认 知世界的方式， 颠覆着传统产业的底层逻辑 ， 更逐浪于资本市场 。 "AI+"的未来还有哪些想象 空间？人形机器人投资的下一阶段焦点在哪？投资者应该如何 从大模型技术发展中寻找机会？ 近日，中欧基金举办了 AI DAY活动。活动邀请了 中欧基金科技战队核心团队、 券商分析师、国 内 AI科学家及产业专家等，分享了当前AI技术发展的最新成果，探讨了 生成式 AI发展趋势及投 资价值，一同解码AI应用的投资机会和无限可能。 中欧基金权益研究部副总监、科技组组长杜厚良： 关注港股大模型应用、国产替代、 3D打印等 作为中欧基金权益研究部副总监、科技组组长，杜厚良认为投资科技一定要立足产业研究，要比 别人更早发现科技产业变化的机会。今年以来，中欧基金科技战队积极主动开展调研，力求挖掘 AI产业的潜在投资机会。 杜厚良介绍，中欧基金科技战队的大部分成员毕业于清华、交大等院校，且兼具 ...

午后突然跳水！ 创业板指领跌 。 截至收盘， 沪指跌0.94% ， 深成指跌0.85% ， 创业板指跌1.18% 。 个股跌多涨少 ， 全市场超4200只个股下跌 。 沪深两市全天成交额1.16万亿 ， 较上个交易日放量529亿 。 板块方面 ， 可控核聚变 、 贵金属 、 创新药 、 维生素等板块涨幅居前 ， 港口 、 游戏 、 算力 、 电力等板块跌幅居前 。 01 午后突然跳水 多只高位股跌停 今日午后，市场突然大调整，早上向好的指数于下午两点之后直接跳水。 从结构上看，大盘蓝筹股是下跌的主要压力，今天早上长江电力就带头下跌，盘中跌幅扩大至2%，中国平安、中信证券、贵州茅台等多只权重股 短线跳水，中国石油、农业银行、中国人寿等股票更是贡献了较大的下跌点数，上证指数跌幅也跟随扩大。 | STEET | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 600900 已收盘05-23 15:00:00 北京 | | | | | | 125.21万人加自选 30.49 -0.54 -1.74% | | | | | | 高 31.06 开 30.99 量 85.42万手 | | ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the top 50 actively managed funds held by institutional investors, highlighting their performance, management styles, and the implications of recent management changes on fund sizes and investor confidence [5][7][9]. Group 1: Top Actively Managed Funds by Institutional Holdings - The fund with the highest institutional holdings is Changxin Jinli Trend Mixed A, with an estimated holding amount of approximately 3.9 billion yuan as of May 19 [6][8]. - Huashang Advantage Industry Mixed ranks second, but its size has significantly decreased following the departure of its manager, Zhou Haidong [7]. - The third position is held by ICBC Innovation Power Stock, managed by Yang Xinxin, who focuses on large-cap value stocks and has a strong track record of risk control [7][9]. - The fourth is Taikang Hongshi March Open Mixed, which has a 100% institutional holding ratio, raising concerns about liquidity risk due to potential concentrated redemptions [7]. - The fifth is Huitianfu Quality Value Mixed, with 90.77% of its holdings by institutions, known for its strong risk control and a maximum drawdown of only 11.85% since inception [7][9]. Group 2: Management Styles and Performance - The fund manager of Changxin Jinli Trend Mixed, Gao Yuan, has been managing since September 2018, employing a top-down macro perspective combined with industry comparisons [6][8]. - Yang Xinxin's strategy in ICBC Innovation Power Stock involves a bottom-up selection of undervalued, high-dividend stocks, contributing to its long-term stability [7]. - Fan Yan, who took over the management of Fuguo Steady Growth Mixed A, utilizes a top-down strategy focusing on macroeconomic indicators to select stocks, maintaining a diversified portfolio [8][9]. - The article notes that the institutional holdings from ranks 11 to 50 also reflect strong recognition from institutions, with several renowned fund managers involved [9].

Market Overview - The market experienced fluctuations, with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.22%, Shenzhen Component Index down 0.72%, ChiNext Index down 0.96%, and the North Exchange 50 Index down 6.15% [1] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets was 1.1 trillion, a decrease of 70.8 billion compared to the previous trading day [1] - Over 4,400 stocks declined, with banking stocks showing resilience, as several banks, including Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, reached historical highs [1] North Exchange 50 Index - The North Exchange 50 Index, which reached a historical high of 1500 points yesterday, saw a significant drop of over 6% today [4] - Leading stock Jinbo Biological, which has the highest market capitalization on the North Exchange, fell nearly 5%, with a current market value of 43.6 billion [7] - Jinbo Biological's stock price had been rising since March, peaking at 589.98 yuan per share on May 21, with a market value exceeding 52 billion [10] - The recent market adjustment is attributed to high-priced stocks retreating and signs of overbuying in micro-cap stocks [10] Innovative Drug Sector - The innovative drug sector showed strength, with Sanofi's stock rising for four consecutive days, achieving a 20% limit-up [11] - Sanofi announced a licensing agreement with Pfizer for its PD-1/VEGF dual-specific antibody SSGJ-707, with a record-breaking upfront payment of $1.25 billion [15] - The potential valuation of Sanofi is discussed, with estimates suggesting a significant increase in net profit due to the licensing agreement [16] Pop Mart - Pop Mart's market capitalization surpassed 300 billion Hong Kong dollars, with a stock price increase of over 5% on May 21 [17] - The surge in stock price is attributed to the strong global demand for its newly launched Labubu third-generation plush product, which has seen significant sales both domestically and internationally [21] - Morgan Stanley raised Pop Mart's target price from 204 HKD to 224 HKD, citing strong demand for Labubu v3 as a key growth factor [22]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that there is no such thing as a sunset industry; profitable companies are always good companies, regardless of the sector they operate in [2]. Group 1: Coal Industry Insights - The author observed that coal stocks had attractive dividend yields, with some Hong Kong-listed companies exceeding 10% [4]. - Key factors for analyzing coal companies include reserves, coal quality, coal prices, extraction costs, and transportation costs [9]. - There is a significant valuation disparity among coal stocks, primarily due to the perception of coal as a sunset industry, leading to substantial discounts in valuations [9]. Group 2: Market Perception and Valuation - The market is divided on the future of coal; some believe the transition to renewable energy will happen quickly, while others think it will take much longer, affecting their investment outlook [10][11]. - The author initially held a negative bias towards coal stocks, influenced by the perception of them as sunset industries, despite recognizing their solid performance metrics [12]. - The article draws a parallel between coal and other industries, such as liquor, suggesting that market skepticism can cloud judgment and lead to missed investment opportunities [14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the cyclical nature of the stock market, emphasizing the rotation of styles and the inevitable return to value after periods of overvaluation in certain sectors [2]. Market Trends and Historical Context - In 2012-2013, small-cap stocks and the ChiNext index saw significant gains, while large-cap stocks were undervalued with a P/E ratio below 10 times [2]. - The second half of 2014 witnessed a rapid increase in large-cap stocks led by brokerage firms, while the ChiNext index remained stagnant [2]. - In 2015, the market shifted back to growth stocks, with the ChiNext index experiencing a 150% increase over four months, despite large-cap stocks remaining flat [2][3]. - The market peaked in May 2015, leading to a significant downturn with many stocks hitting their lower limits [3]. - From 2016 to 2018, overvalued growth stocks faced a three-year decline, while large-cap stocks began a small bull market, with leading banks reaching a valuation of 10 times [3]. - The market saw a downturn in 2018, with the ChiNext index suffering substantial losses [3]. - Between 2019 and 2021, strong stocks in sectors like oil and banking faced declines, while growth stocks in consumption, pharmaceuticals, and technology surged, with the ChiNext index rising by 200% [3]. - 2022 was another down year, but by early 2023, value stocks in banking, telecommunications, and oil began to lead the market again, with many doubling in value [3]. Future Outlook - By May 2025, the market shows signs of potential shifts, with banks, telecommunications, and oil stocks having doubled, but some are experiencing declining performance [4]. - Leading companies in consumption and manufacturing have seen their dividend yields drop below 4% or even 5% due to declines or growth [4]. - The pharmaceutical sector, which has faced a four-year decline, is beginning to stabilize, with new consumption trends emerging and significant breakthroughs in drug development [4]. - The market is seeing an influx of new capital, with state-owned enterprises supporting the market, insurance funds investing in high-dividend stocks, and speculative funds driving up small-cap stocks [4].