Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that asset allocation is a personal expression of one's understanding of the world, risk perception, and life goals, rather than merely a numerical game [2][4][5]. Group 1: Investment Tools and Strategies - Investors can utilize three main investment tools: asset allocation, stock selection, and market timing, with asset allocation accounting for over 90% of the volatility in institutional portfolio returns [2]. - Different investment strategies reflect individual preferences and risk tolerance, leading to diverse asset allocation choices among investors [3][4]. Group 2: Personalization of Investment Portfolios - Investment portfolios serve as a reflection of an individual's values and future aspirations, with choices influenced by personal experiences and environmental factors [3][5]. - The article highlights that there is no absolute right or wrong in investment choices, as they are based on different cognitive frameworks and risk perceptions [4]. Group 3: The Role of External Opinions - Investors often face pressure from external opinions, which can lead to unnecessary adjustments in their portfolios; successful investing relies on deep insights and steadfast beliefs rather than frequent trading [3]. - The article suggests that maintaining a clear understanding of one's investment philosophy can reduce the impact of external criticism [5]. Group 4: The Snowball Three-Factor Method - The Snowball Three-Factor Method promotes long-term investment through diversification across assets, markets, and timing, aiming for diversified sources of returns and risk mitigation [6].

大家周末愉快，一起来简单看下美股市场的表现。 当地时间周五，受美联储理事沃勒鸽派发言影响，美股一度走高，随后有所回落，最终三大指数 中仅道指收涨。本周，道指涨0.02%，标普500指数跌0.15%，纳指涨0.21%。 02 "稳定币第一股"再度暴涨20%！ 市场焦点集中在美联储降息议题上， 不过美联储官员之间也存在分歧。并且特朗普在社交媒体上 再度炮轰鲍威尔： "如果他把利率降到应有的水平——1%至2%，这个'笨蛋'每年能为美国节省 多达1万亿美元。" 一起来看具体情况。 01 大分歧！ 美联储官员降息观点不一 美东时间6月20日周五，美联储的"当红理事"沃勒， 他认为最早7月的下次美联储FOMC货币政 策会议上就可以降息。 沃勒在讲话中淡化特朗普政府关税对通胀的冲击。他认为，应该忽略关税对物价的一次性影响。 他强调，如果开始担心劳动力市场下行风险，那现在就得行动，"为什么我们要等到它真正崩溃才 开始降息？" 不过里士满联储主席巴尔金称，他认为FOMC不急于降息。尚未准备好排除关税带来的通胀风 险。如果美国通胀飙升，不能忽视，物价指数仍高于目标。目前数据中没有紧急因素需要美联储 降息。此外旧金山联储主席戴利预 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that high dividend stocks are not solely a result of growth but rather possess inherent traits that make them likely to offer high dividends, emphasizing the importance of business models and competitive advantages [2][3]. Business Model - Companies with light asset and low capital expenditure business models are more likely to become high dividend stocks, as they have lower fixed costs and more available cash for dividends [3]. - High capital expenditure businesses face more pressure to reinvest profits, reducing the likelihood of high dividends [3]. Competitive Advantage - Sustainable high dividends require companies to have a competitive moat, ensuring stable output capabilities [3]. - Examples include Changjiang Electric, which benefits from prime hydropower resources, and banks that leverage regulatory licenses and customer loyalty [4]. Dividend Sustainability - Companies like Fuyao and Yili, despite not being cash cows, maintain high dividends due to their competitive advantages, which allow for stable cash flow over time [4]. - The focus for identifying reliable long-term dividend stocks should be on the presence of both a favorable business model and a competitive moat [4]. Dividend Reinvestment - Dividend reinvestment can enhance income over time, creating a compounding effect similar to interest [5]. - Investors can set future passive income goals, allowing for a balance between current living expenses and future financial security [5].

直接上图，大类资产配置分别是偏债基金30%，偏股基金50%，商品基金20%，整体比较均衡，年化收益目标大约8-10%，最大回撤尽量控制在 15%以内，比较符合我的需求，稳中求进。 偏股基金 50% 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者：阿帅 最近学习了雪球三分法做资产配置，也看了小雪的方案，我属于极简主义，包括房子装修都是极简风，不太喜欢基金数量太多。 于是就想怎么用最少的基金做好方案，但同时又要满足三分法中"资产分散，市场分散"理念。 我尝试了很多基金的搭配，也回测了很多次，发现这4只基金做方案效果还是不错的，既符合我的极简要求，也符合三分法的逻辑。 偏股资产主要分享全球经济、优秀企业增长的红利,具备高 风险高收益特征。投资类型多元丰富,包含不同地区、策略 的偏股基金。 基金列表(2) 配置比例 中金中证优选300指数A 25.00% 501060 股票型 选股逻辑为"好公司、好价格",选取近5年平均股息... v 博时纳斯达克100指数发起（QDII）A 25.00% 016055 QDII 纳斯达克100是由具有高科技、高成长和非金融的特 ... × ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the disparity in valuation between Chinese banks and their international counterparts, emphasizing that the low valuations of Chinese banks do not align with their profitability and market contributions [2][4][6]. Group 1: Economic Context - China's economic development over the past 40 years has been remarkable, with a unique political and economic system that influences capital market pricing [2][3]. - The pricing of bonds in China follows a risk premium principle, with government bonds having the lowest interest rates due to their high credit quality [3]. Group 2: Bank Valuation Analysis - From 2010 to 2023, the profit contribution of the banking sector to A-share listed companies has consistently exceeded 39%, yet their market capitalization share has decreased from 15.0% to 8.7% [3]. - In 2024, the price-to-book (PB) ratio for major Chinese banks is 0.56, while for U.S. banks it is 1.4, indicating a significant valuation gap [4]. - The average PB ratio for global banks is 1.37, whereas A-shares and H-shares of Chinese banks are at 0.62 and 0.40, respectively, which is less than half of the global average [5]. Group 3: Market Perception and Mispricing - The market perceives low valuations for A-share listed banks due to expectations of declining asset growth, profitability, and concerns over risk management [6]. - The true reason for the low valuations is attributed to a denial of China's political and economic system, leading to a mispricing of bank stocks over the past decade [6]. - The article argues that the conditions for a valuation recovery of bank stocks are maturing, with stable loan growth and a potential shift in government policy [6].

Group 1: Bubble Mart's Decline - Bubble Mart's stock price has dropped by nearly 18% from its historical high of 283 HKD, resulting in a market capitalization loss of over 60 billion HKD [2][6] - The recent release of the Labubu series blind boxes has led to a significant decrease in secondary market prices, with prices dropping approximately 50% [8][9] - The company has increased the supply of Labubu products to improve consumer purchasing experiences, which has negatively impacted scalpers who previously profited from reselling [5][8] Group 2: Traditional Liquor Sector Recovery - The traditional liquor sector, particularly Baijiu, has seen a rebound with the sector rising over 2%, making it the top-performing industry on that day [10][11] - Companies like Huangtai Liquor and Jingjia Gongjiu have experienced significant stock price increases, with some stocks rising over 5% [11] - The market is shifting towards high-cost performance products as younger consumers drive demand, leading to a downward adjustment in product pricing strategies [13] Group 3: New vs. Old Consumption Trends - Discussions on social platforms highlight the contrasting narratives of new consumption, represented by Bubble Mart, and traditional consumption, represented by Baijiu [14][15] - Analysts suggest that while Bubble Mart has a strong growth trajectory, its reliance on single IPs may pose risks, as competitors can easily replicate its business model [15][16] - The transition in consumer behavior from functional needs to emotional value is noted, with traditional liquor companies needing to adapt to policy changes and economic recovery for sustained growth [18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the structural differentiation and paradigm shift in the current Chinese consumer market, highlighting the rapid growth of new consumption sectors compared to the stagnation of traditional consumption sectors like high-end liquor [2][10]. Group 1: Comparison of New and Old Consumption Markets - Traditional consumption, exemplified by Wuliangye, faces challenges due to policy restrictions, shrinking demand, and valuation corrections. The 2025 policy prohibits government agencies from providing alcohol at official receptions, impacting high-end liquor consumption [3][4]. - Economic deflation and consumption downgrade are evident, with CPI showing negative growth for two consecutive quarters in 2025, leading consumers to prefer more cost-effective products. The price of Feitian Moutai has dropped below 2000 yuan per bottle, weakening the "face-saving" function of high-end liquor [3][4]. - The valuation bubble in the liquor sector has burst, with a 200% increase in the sector from 2020 to 2024, leading to concerns about whether Wuliangye's earnings growth can match its valuation as the dynamic P/E ratio falls to 7.8 times [3][4]. - High inventory levels and weak demand in traditional consumption scenarios, such as weddings and business banquets, have resulted in a revenue growth slowdown for major liquor companies, with growth rates dropping to 5%-10% in Q1 2025 [3][4]. Group 2: Explosive Logic of New Consumption - New consumption, represented by Pop Mart, thrives on emotional value and the needs of Generation Z, utilizing blind box strategies to create uncertainty and surprise, achieving a gross margin of 50.9% in 2024, significantly higher than traditional sectors [4][5]. - Pop Mart has established an IP ecosystem and global expansion strategy, planning to increase overseas stores by 80% to 230 by 2025, enhancing cultural output [5]. - The company has built supply chain and channel barriers, rapidly expanding production capacity and enhancing user engagement through a combination of direct stores and robotic shops [5]. - The influx of southbound capital exceeding 610 billion HKD and policies promoting "old-for-new" exchanges are stimulating the new consumption sector, with the toy market expected to reach 110.1 billion yuan by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 20% [5][6]. Group 3: Core Drivers of Market Transformation - The shift in consumer behavior is characterized by a focus on "quality-price ratio" and "emotional-price ratio," with new consumption companies experiencing a revenue growth rate of 65% in 2024, compared to just 2.4% for traditional consumption [6]. - Technological advancements and data-driven strategies are facilitating the rapid response of new consumption companies to market demands, with online retail accounting for 26.8% of total retail sales in 2024 [6]. - Policy support and capital inflow are crucial for the recovery of traditional consumption, which relies on further policy measures to stimulate growth [6]. Group 4: Future Investment Opportunities - Traditional consumption companies like Wuliangye have potential for valuation recovery, but face short-term risks from policy restrictions and high inventory levels. Long-term prospects depend on economic recovery and policy easing [7][8]. - New consumption companies like Pop Mart exhibit strong growth potential due to their IP ecosystem, global expansion capabilities, and increasing emotional economic penetration, with overseas revenue expected to grow by 259.6% year-on-year in 2025 [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a systematic investment approach, particularly through the "three-part method" for fund investment, which aims to achieve stable returns that outpace inflation and bank savings [2][4]. Summary by Sections Initial Hesitation and Learning - The author initially hesitated to invest in funds due to a negative perception influenced by a colleague's comment about fund managers [2]. - The discovery of the Snowball App led to a renewed interest in fund investment, including a realization that previous investments were made through platforms like Alipay's Yu'ebao [2][3]. Understanding Fund Investment - The author gained a deeper understanding of fund investment concepts such as compound interest, asset allocation, rebalancing, and long-term investment through various resources, including a program featuring a discussion on pension investment [3]. - The recognition of the importance of a scientifically constructed fund portfolio based on individual risk tolerance was highlighted [4]. Implementation of the Three-Part Method - The author began implementing the "three-part method" for fund investment, which involves creating a reasonable investment portfolio to smooth out volatility and achieve average market costs through long-term investment [4][5]. - Two investment plans were created: a growth-oriented plan and an aggressive plan, which were shared with friends, indicating a growing acceptance of this investment strategy [5][6]. Investment Insights - Key insights learned from the investment experience include: 1. Fund investment should focus on the long term [7]. 2. Only use idle funds for investment, ensuring a reserve for emergencies [7]. 3. Long-term systematic investment helps to smooth out volatility and costs [8]. 4. Investor returns are influenced by both fund performance and individual investment behavior [9]. 5. Avoid trying to time the market; instead, focus on consistent investment to achieve average market costs [9]. 6. Avoid frequent fund switching and set realistic return expectations [11].

3倍大牛股 20%跳水跌停 市场全天低开低走，截至收盘 ， 沪指 跌0.79% ， 深成指 跌1.21% ， 创业板指跌1.36%。 盘面上 ， 市场热点较为杂乱 ， 个股跌多涨少 ， 全市场超4600只个股下跌 从板块来看 ， 油气股逆势大涨 ， 准油股份 等多股涨停； 固态电池概念股一度冲高。下跌方面 ，医药 概念股持续调整 ， 常山药业 20%跌停， 服装家纺、饮料制造等消费概念跌幅较大。 港股也同步调整，截至发稿，恒生指数、恒生科技指数均跌超2%，泡泡玛特、老铺黄金跌超5%。 01 医药板块集体回调，常山药业迎来20%跌停， 此前，常山药业自4月份低点，两个多月时间最高涨幅接近3倍。 广生堂、翰宇药业跌超11%，永安 药业跌停等。 >> · 15.75 11.92 成交额 33.95亿 MA5:28.90亿 10:31.33亿 盘后:96800 40.43亿 == MACD (12,26,9) DIF:7.26 DEA:6.68 MACD:1.16 7.86 4741711111111 -0.66 2025-04 2025-06 2025-05 不少机构依旧看好下半年创新药板块的投资机会。 银河证券表 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that even with the same price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) to return on equity (ROE) ratio at the time of purchase, companies with higher ROE will outperform in the long run in the U.S. stock market [1][19]. Group 1: ROE and Market Performance - High ROE is indicative of a strong economic moat and a guarantee of higher returns over the long term [2]. - Apple's ROE was around 33% before 2018, but after that, its debt ratio increased, distorting ROE [2]. - Walmart's ROE is approximately 22%, while Coca-Cola's ROE ranges between 30% and 40% [2]. Group 2: Market Capitalization Growth - On June 19, 2020, Apple and Walmart had similar price-to-earnings ratios of 1.02 and 1.03, respectively [5]. - Over five years, Apple's market value grew by 130%, while Walmart's increased by 97% [7]. - On February 11, 2011, both Apple and Walmart had the same price-to-earnings ratio of 0.56 [8]. - Over fourteen years, Apple's market value increased by 8 times, compared to Walmart's 3 times [9]. Group 3: Comparison with Coca-Cola - On April 29, 2021, Apple and Coca-Cola had close price-to-earnings ratios of 0.84 and 0.86, respectively [11]. - In the following five years, Apple's market value grew by 34%, while Coca-Cola's increased by 30% [12]. - On November 25, 2011, Apple's price-to-earnings ratio was 0.32, compared to Coca-Cola's 0.28 [13]. - Over fourteen years, Apple's market value grew by 8 times, while Coca-Cola's only increased by 1.1 times [17]. Group 4: Walmart's Position - Walmart's ROE is lower than Coca-Cola's, and its market value has been below Coca-Cola's for most of the time [15]. - In 2023, Walmart's market value began to significantly surpass Coca-Cola's, but its price-to-earnings ratio remains higher than Coca-Cola's, which is not sustainable in the long term [15].