证券研究报告 | 海外市场月报 2025 年 06 月 30 日 [Table_Main] 海外市场月报 证券分析师 薛威 资格编号：S0120523080002 邮箱：xuewei＠tebon.com.cn 谭诗吟 资格编号：S0120523070007 邮箱：tansy＠tebon.com.cn 美元资产修复之后 [Table_Summary] 投资要点： 请务必阅读正文之后的信息披露和法律声明 6 月全球股市涨多跌少。美国三大股指集体上涨，其中纳斯达克指数领涨；欧洲 三大主要指数表现分化；亚太市场方面，韩国综合指数领涨。 美国 5 月 PCE 基本符合预期，消费者信心显著下降。6 月 27 日，美国商务部公 布数据显示，美国 5 月 PCE 物价指数同比上升 2.3%，符合预期，美国 5 月核心 PCE 物价指数年率录得 2.7%，创 2025 年 2 月以来新高。6 月 25 日周二，谘商 会最新报告显示，由于预期商业状况、就业市场和收入前景较为低迷，美国消费 者信心本月有所减弱，美国 6 月谘商会消费者信心指数降至 100.4，略高于市场 预期的 100，但 5 月数据下修至 101.3。 美元弱势 ...

欧洲央行首席经济学家连恩：我们正面对地缘政治的诸多问题，而这些问题，某种程度上，正引导着全 球化的逐步退却。 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The overall market shows a complex situation with different trends in various sectors. In the financial futures and options market, both stock index futures and treasury bond futures are expected to be strong in the short and medium - term. In the commodity futures and options market, different metals and energy materials, as well as agricultural products, have their own unique supply - demand and price trends [1][2][4]. Summary by Category Financial Futures and Options Stock Index Futures (IF, IH, IC, IM) - **Day - to - day view**: Oscillate with a slight upward bias [1] - **Medium - term view**: Bullish [1] - **Reference strategy**: Hold short MO2507 - P - 5800 out - of - the - money put options and IM2507 long positions [1] - **Core logic**: Positive sentiment in the equity market due to Sino - US communication and policy support, and the potential rise of the science and technology sector [1] Treasury Bond Futures (TS, TF, T, TL) - **Day - to - day view**: Oscillate with a slight upward bias [2] - **Medium - term view**: Bullish [2] - **Reference strategy**: Hold T2509 or TL2509 long positions [3] - **Core logic**: Weak domestic fundamentals strengthen policy expectations, and the central bank's continued net investment affects the capital market [3] Commodity Futures and Options Metal and New Energy Materials - **Copper** - **Day - to - day view**: Price range from 79,200 to 81,000 [4] - **Medium - term view**: Price range from 60,000 to 90,000 [4] - **Reference strategy**: Adopt an oscillating and slightly upward trading idea, buy call options [4] - **Core logic**: The "Big and Beautiful" bill in the US, supply shortages, and changes in international demand and inventory levels affect copper prices [4] - **Industrial Silicon** - **Day - to - day view**: Run with a slight upward bias, price range from 8,000 to 8,100 [5] - **Medium - term view**: Face downward pressure, price range from 7,000 to 9,000 [5] - **Reference strategy**: Hold short SI2508 - C - 9000 until expiration, short futures on rallies [5] - **Core logic**: Decreased supply and demand, and high inventory levels [5] - **Polysilicon** - **Day - to - day view**: Run with a slight upward bias, price range from 33,000 to 35,000 [7] - **Medium - term view**: Trade at a low level, price range from 28,000 to 38,000 [7] - **Reference strategy**: Hold short PS2508 - C - 45000 until expiration [7] - **Core logic**: Decreased supply and demand, and high inventory levels [7] - **Aluminum** - **Day - to - day view**: Run with a slight upward bias, price range from 20,400 to 20,700 [9] - **Medium - term view**: Trade at a high level, price range from 19,200 to 21,000 [9] - **Reference strategy**: Sell AL2508 - P - 19300 [9] - **Core logic**: Limited supply increase, low inventory, good performance in the automotive market, and the overall rise of non - ferrous metals [9] - **Lithium Carbonate** - **Day - to - day view**: Run with a slight upward bias, price range from 63,000 to 65,000 [11] - **Medium - term view**: Cost support weakens, prices decline steadily, price range from 56,000 to 68,000 [11] - **Reference strategy**: Short futures on rallies, sell LC2508 - C - 83000 [11] - **Core logic**: Low spot prices, large supply, and high inventory levels [11] Black and Building Materials - **Rebar and Hot - Rolled Coil** - **Day - to - day view**: Downward pressure weakens [14] - **Medium - term view**: Stop falling and stabilize [14] - **Reference strategy**: Exit the strategy of selling call options and buying put options on RB2510, sell out - of - the - money put options on rebar RB2510 [14] - **Core logic**: Potential relief of raw material inventory pressure and changes in supply and demand [14] Livestock, Poultry, and Soft Commodities - **Hogs** - **Day - to - day view**: Run with a slight upward bias [17] - **Medium - term view**: Rebound temporarily and then maintain a weak trend [17] - **Reference strategy**: Short on rallies [17] - **Core logic**: Changes in supply and demand, with supply remaining abundant and demand weak [17] - **Sugar** - **Day - to - day view**: Oscillate weakly [19] - **Medium - term view**: Rise first and then fall [19] - **Reference strategy**: Short on rallies [19] - **Core logic**: Global supply surplus expectations and domestic supply - demand and import situations [19] - **Protein Meal** - **Day - to - day view**: Soybean meal 2509 oscillates in the range of [2,900, 3,000] [22] - **Medium - term view**: Soybean meal 2509 builds a bottom in the range of [2,900, 3,100] [22] - **Reference strategy**: Sell out - of - the - money put options on soybean meal 2508 - P - 2850 [22] - **Core logic**: Uncertainty in the weather of US soybean and Canadian rapeseed growing areas, and changes in international and domestic soybean and rapeseed markets [22] Energy and Chemicals - **Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)** - **Day - to - day view**: Oscillate within a range [25] - **Medium - term view**: Face downward pressure [25] - **Reference strategy**: Hold short out - of - the - money call options on PG2508 [25] - **Core logic**: Changes in supply, demand, and cost factors [25] - **PVC** - **Day - to - day view**: Oscillate with a slight upward bias [28] - **Medium - term view**: Limited upside potential [28] - **Reference strategy**: Continue to hold the strategy of selling out - of - the - money call options on PVC [28] - **Core logic**: Changes in cost, supply, demand, and inventory levels [28]

Core Insights - The recent occupation of a lithium mine by Russian forces near Shevchenkove village in the Donetsk region has resulted in Ukraine losing control over a critical strategic resource, disrupting the economic cooperation framework between the U.S. and Ukraine [1][3] - The lithium mine, although small in size (approximately 100 acres), is considered one of Ukraine's most valuable mineral deposits, essential for battery manufacturing and advanced technologies [3] - The U.S. previously signed agreements with Ukraine to prioritize the development of its lithium resources, aiming to strengthen its influence in the global mineral supply chain [3] Economic and Strategic Implications - The loss of control over the lithium mine poses significant risks to Ukraine's economic recovery and strategic autonomy, as control over mineral resources is directly linked to economic power [3][5] - Ukrainian officials have expressed the need for increased military support from the U.S. to effectively counter Russian advances and maintain control over strategic resources [3][5] - The U.S. has shown reluctance to link mineral development transactions with additional military aid, indicating a cautious approach to military involvement in Ukraine [3][5][8] Geopolitical Context - The seizure of the lithium mine by Russian forces highlights the ongoing resource competition and geopolitical tensions, with lithium becoming a cornerstone for future energy and high-tech industries [5][7] - The situation reflects a broader trend where resource control is intertwined with national security, emphasizing that economic cooperation cannot be isolated from security considerations [7][8] - The ongoing conflict over the lithium mine is expected to intensify, becoming a focal point in the geopolitical rivalry between major powers [7][8] Future Outlook - The interplay between resource control and military support will continue to shape the dynamics of U.S.-Ukraine cooperation, with the potential for significant implications on regional stability and global supply chains [7][8] - The challenges faced by Ukraine in balancing economic interests with military realities underscore the complexities of modern geopolitical strategies [8]

Group 1: Gold Market - Investors are closely monitoring trade negotiations as the deadline for Trump's proposed "reciprocal tariffs" approaches, with indications that the negotiations may not be as severe as in April [2] - The proposed "Big and Beautiful" bill passed the House on May 22 and narrowly passed a procedural vote in the Senate on June 28, with modifications requiring another House vote; the CBO predicts a $4.5 trillion revenue reduction and a $3.3 trillion increase in the fiscal deficit by 2034 [2] - Technically, gold has been in a correction phase since April 22, with a potential rebound if it stabilizes above $3,300, targeting $3,360 [2] Group 2: Oil Market - Despite a verbal ceasefire between Israel and Iran, tensions remain high, with Trump threatening further military action against Iran and Iran halting inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency [4] - The probability of the Federal Reserve maintaining interest rates in July is 80%, with a 92.5% chance of a rate cut in September, increasing market bets on future rate cuts, which could boost oil demand [5] - OPEC+ is expected to continue increasing production, leading to potential oversupply in the oil market; if global economic conditions improve, it may bolster market confidence [5] - Technically, oil prices have shown a downward trend, with resistance at $67 and a potential drop to $60 if prices fall below $64 [5] Group 3: Nikkei 225 and Copper Market - The Nikkei 225 index has been on a strong upward trend, breaking the highest price since July 18, 2024, but caution is advised against chasing further gains [7] - Copper prices have been fluctuating since early April, with a potential shift in trend; support is noted at $4.88 and resistance at $5.06 [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that President Trump announced the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities, which escalates geopolitical risks and disrupts market expectations for US-Iran negotiations [2][4][11] - Trump's statement indicates a dual strategy of sanctions and military threats, emphasizing that sanctions will not be lifted until Iran completely abandons its nuclear program [5][11] - The Iranian government has responded by asserting its readiness to counter any aggression and has called for accountability from the UN Security Council [2][4] Group 2 - The escalation of geopolitical risks has led to significant fluctuations in the gold market, with spot gold prices experiencing a sharp rise and subsequent decline due to market reactions [6][11] - Historical comparisons show that gold prices surged significantly during past US-Iran conflicts, indicating a potential for similar behavior in the current situation [7] - Despite the geopolitical tensions boosting demand for gold, the hawkish stance of the Federal Reserve poses a challenge to gold prices, as rising interest rates could diminish gold's appeal [8][11] Group 3 - Central banks globally are expected to continue increasing their gold holdings, with a strong interest from emerging market central banks [9] - The decline in the dollar's share of global foreign exchange reserves suggests a structural support for gold as it becomes a key beneficiary of the "de-dollarization" trend [9][11] - The risk of an economic recession in the US provides a baseline support for gold prices, despite short-term pressures from interest rate expectations [8][11]

Core Viewpoint - The situation in the Middle East has escalated significantly due to military actions by Israel and the U.S. against Iran's nuclear facilities, with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicating that Iran could resume uranium enrichment within "months" despite the damage [1][3]. Group 1: Iran's Nuclear Program - IAEA Director General Grossi's assessment suggests that some Iranian nuclear facilities remain operational, and there is uncertainty regarding the potential secret relocation of high-enriched uranium stocks [3][4]. - Iran's parliament has voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, effectively closing off transparency regarding its nuclear program [3][6]. - The Iranian government appears to leverage the "nuclear uncertainty" to gain strategic advantage, despite suffering damage to its facilities [3][6]. Group 2: U.S. and Israel's Military Actions - The military actions by the U.S. and Israel are questioned in terms of their effectiveness, with claims that they have set back Iran's nuclear program "decades" being viewed as politically motivated rather than based on reliable intelligence [4][6]. - The actions taken by the U.S. and Israel may provide Iran with justification for retaliatory measures, complicating the geopolitical landscape [4][6]. Group 3: Regional and Global Implications - The current situation reflects a broader reconfiguration of power in the Middle East, with nuclear capabilities becoming a key bargaining chip among regional players [6][8]. - The failure of international oversight mechanisms, such as the IAEA, raises concerns about nuclear non-proliferation and the potential for increased regional tensions [6][8]. - The escalation of conflict over nuclear issues could have far-reaching consequences for global supply chains, financial markets, and strategic alignments, with major powers unable to effectively mediate the situation [8].

Group 1 - Geopolitical risks are shifting market focus back to fundamental factors, with OPEC+ potentially increasing production in August and developments in US "reciprocal tariffs" being key influences on future oil prices [1] - As of June 30, WTI crude oil futures fell by 0.52% to $65.18 per barrel, while Brent crude oil futures decreased by 0.25% to $66.63 per barrel, reversing gains made during the Israel-Iran conflict [1] - The conflict between Israel and Iran, which included airstrikes and threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, initially caused Brent prices to spike to around $80 per barrel before dropping significantly after a ceasefire announcement [1] Group 2 - Analysts from Shenwan Hongyuan Futures noted that a peace agreement between Israel and Iran led to a significant drop in oil prices, with future price movements dependent on geopolitical negotiations, OPEC+ production rates, and tariff discussions [2] - The US is entering a new phase of high shale oil production, with the EIA projecting an increase of 400,000 barrels per day to reach 13.6 million barrels per day, putting pressure on other oil-producing countries [2] - OPEC+ is expected to increase production by 411,000 barrels per day in August and 274,000 barrels per day in September, with a complete removal of previous voluntary cuts by the end of the year [2] Group 3 - There are concerns about weak global oil demand, which may further pressure oil prices, especially with the upcoming deadline for the US to suspend "reciprocal tariffs" [3] - If the US can successfully negotiate agreements with other countries, it could lead to an increase in oil demand by at least 300,000 barrels, although short-term trade negotiations may hinder this [3] - Recent economic forecasts from the IMF and OECD have downgraded global economic expectations for the next two years, indicating that oil demand may be suppressed [3]

Group 1 - South Korea is actively seeking to extend the 90-day tariff suspension period originally set to expire on July 9, due to the current negotiation progress not being sufficient to meet the deadline [1] - The recent high-level trade talks between South Korea and the U.S. marked the third round of technical negotiations since the agreement to formulate a tariff reduction plan by July 9 was reached in late April [1] - The South Korean official indicated that some countries may reach agreements before July 8, while others may require extensions, and some may continue negotiations under the existing tariff framework [1] Group 2 - The U.S. focused on non-tariff barriers during the recent talks, shifting attention from nearly zero tariffs on U.S. imports to technical trade barriers and regulatory standards [2] - Discussions regarding foreign exchange rate policies and the sharing of defense costs for U.S. troops stationed in South Korea are being conducted through separate channels [2] - The ongoing tariff negotiations reflect a deeper strategic competition between South Korea and the U.S., with South Korea's key industries like automotive and steel urgently needing tariff relief, while the U.S. aims to reshape the Asia-Pacific trade landscape through new trade rules [2]

Core Viewpoint - The geopolitical risk premium has decreased following the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, leading to a significant drop in international oil prices and a shift in investor focus back to fundamentals rather than geopolitical tail risks [1] Group 1: Geopolitical Developments - The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran has alleviated concerns regarding supply disruptions in the oil market [1] - The reduction in geopolitical tensions has allowed for a reassessment of inflation expectations, providing some breathing room for investors [1] Group 2: Market Implications - Expectations of a substantial increase in production by OPEC+ in August are contributing to downward pressure on oil prices [1] - The recent significant weekly decline in international oil prices reflects the market's reaction to these geopolitical developments and production forecasts [1]