Group 1 - The article discusses the significant fluctuations in the Hong Kong dollar exchange rate since May, highlighting its movement between strong and weak exchange guarantees and the underlying causes and potential market impacts [7][8]. - It addresses the recent pause in local government subsidies, examining the changes in the "old for new" mechanism compared to 2024 and the rapid usage of subsidies in certain regions [9][8]. - The article analyzes the rebound in M1 growth as of May, attributing it to the introduction of new policy financial tools and the expectation of stable credit performance [12][12]. - It explores the divergence between consumption and production, citing factors such as holiday distribution, e-commerce promotions, and declines in exports and investments [16][16]. - The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is noted as a driver for rising gold and oil prices, indicating external influences on domestic markets [18][18]. Group 2 - The article outlines the recent policy initiatives in Shenzhen aimed at deepening reform and innovation, including enhancing collaboration between industry and academia, improving financial services for the real economy, and promoting talent acquisition [22][22]. - It highlights the Federal Open Market Committee's decision to maintain the federal funds rate at 4.25-4.50%, along with adjustments to economic and inflation forecasts, suggesting a potential for interest rate cuts in the future [25][25]. - The macroeconomic outlook is discussed, with a focus on the potential for "stagflation" and the implications for future economic policies and market conditions [26][26].

增量政策方面，最大的可能是落实前期提出的"设立新型政策性金融工具"，用作项目资本金，进而提振 投资。 6月20日，中国人民银行授权全国银行间同业拆借中心公布，2025年6月20日贷款市场报价利率（LPR） 为：1年期LPR为3.0%，5年期以上LPR为3.5%。在上月双双下调10bp之后，6月均维持不变。 多位业内人士分析称，6月LPR不变符合市场预期，短期内将进入政策观察期，LPR报价有可能继续保 持稳定。 6月LPR为何维持不变？ 6月LPR报价维持不变，主要源于两方面原因。一是近期政策利率持稳，二是银行息差继续承压，LPR 继续下调受限。 6月政策利率保持不变，影响LPR报价加点的因素也没有发生重大变化。中国民生银行首席经济学家温 彬分析，当前，国内外形势发生了一定变化，使得短期内国内货币政策再度加码的必要性不强，政策利 率预计持稳，LPR报价也会维持稳定。 伴随5月降准落地、存款挂牌利率再度下调，商业银行负债成本得以继续改善，但存款定期化、长期化 趋势日益加剧，约束了存款成本的下降幅度。数据显示，2025年4月，居民和企业定期存款的占比分别 达到74.3%和74%，呈不断上升态势。此外，前期对公存款和 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Loan Prime Rate (LPR) for June remains unchanged, with the 1-year LPR at 3.00% and the 5-year LPR at 3.50%, aligning with market expectations [2][4][12]. Summary by Relevant Sections LPR Stability - The stability of the LPR is attributed to the recent policy rate cuts by the central bank and the unchanged 7-day reverse repurchase rate at 1.40% [4][12]. - The current LPR levels are seen as adequate for both corporate and personal loan rates, which are already low [7][12]. Banking Sector Insights - Commercial banks are facing pressure on net interest margins, which have decreased to 1.43%, down 9 basis points from the previous quarter, limiting their ability to lower LPR further [7][10]. - The focus for banks is on managing liability costs and optimizing asset structures to stabilize margins [10]. Economic Context and Future Outlook - The economic environment suggests that there is no immediate need for further monetary policy easing, with expectations that LPR will remain stable in the short term [9][12]. - The central bank's monetary policy aims to balance supporting the real economy while maintaining the health of the banking system, indicating a multi-faceted approach to monetary policy [9][12]. Financing Costs and Policy Measures - The current financing costs for enterprises and residents have significantly decreased, with "expensive financing" no longer being a primary concern [12]. - Future efforts to reduce overall financing costs may focus on lowering non-interest costs such as collateral and service fees rather than solely relying on LPR adjustments [12]. Potential Policy Changes - There is speculation about potential incremental policy measures in the second half of the year, particularly in response to economic conditions and external pressures [15][16]. - The introduction of new policy financial tools is anticipated to stimulate investment, with estimates suggesting that such measures could leverage significant amounts of credit demand [16].

Group 1: Policy Financial Tools - Historical policy financial tools were introduced as counter-cyclical measures to stabilize the economy and enhance local investment capabilities, characterized by low costs, quick deployment, and market-oriented operations [1][20][21] - New policy financial tools are expected to focus more on technology innovation, consumption, and foreign trade, with significant attention on their scale, leverage effects, and issuance rhythm [1][22] Group 2: Banking Sector - The loan interest rate is expected to decline significantly slower in 2025, with the LPR reform leading to a rapid decline in loan rates during certain periods, but a slowdown is anticipated moving forward [3][31][32] - The banking sector is likely to see a stabilization in performance due to reduced pressure on interest margins, with a recommendation to focus on high-quality regional small banks and stable state-owned banks [3][32] Group 3: Non-Banking Sector - Guoyin Financial Leasing - Guoyin Financial Leasing is projected to achieve total revenue of 28.56 billion yuan in 2024, with a year-on-year growth of 7.2%, and a net profit of 4.5 billion yuan, up 8.5% [3] - The company has seen rapid growth in its ship leasing segment, with revenue reaching 7.7 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 32.4% [3] Group 4: Non-Banking Sector - Blue Sky Technology - Blue Sky Technology reported a revenue of 2.554 billion yuan in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 2.6%, with a net profit of 787 million yuan, up 9.8% [24] - The company’s adsorption materials business has shown strong growth, while the lithium extraction project has seen a significant decline in revenue [24][25] Group 5: Non-Banking Sector - Ruile New Materials - Ruile New Materials achieved a revenue of 1.459 billion yuan in 2024, with a year-on-year growth of 20.7%, and a net profit of 252 million yuan, up 87.6% [27] - The display materials segment has become the largest business area for the company, driven by the increasing penetration of OLED panels [27][28][29]

Group 1: Historical Policy Financial Instruments - Historical policy financial instruments were introduced during counter-cyclical adjustments to stabilize the economy and enhance local investment capabilities, characterized by their ability to leverage social funds into long-term infrastructure investments, low costs, and rapid deployment [1][7][8] - The Special Construction Bonds, created in 2015 to address domestic economic downturn pressures, helped alleviate local expenditure pressures and meet funding needs for key projects, becoming a crucial tool for stabilizing growth in infrastructure [9][15] - In 2022, the Policy Development Financial Instruments were launched to actively expand effective investment, with a rapid implementation timeline that allowed for quick project initiation and support for infrastructure investment growth [21][27] Group 2: New Policy Financial Instruments - The new policy financial instruments are expected to focus on technology innovation, consumption, and foreign trade, with a market-oriented mechanism to address fiscal shortfalls and support key project capital needs [31][36] - Recent meetings in various regions indicate a proactive approach to deploying these new financial tools, with local governments emphasizing the importance of leveraging these instruments to stimulate effective investment [33][35] - The operational model for the new instruments will likely continue to involve policy banks leading the initiatives, with the central bank providing funding support through structural monetary policy tools [36]

Economic Performance - In May, industrial added value increased by 5.8% year-on-year, while the service production index rose by 6.2%[3] - Retail sales grew by 6.4% year-on-year, up 1.3 percentage points from the previous month[3] - Fixed asset investment accumulated a year-on-year growth of 3.7%, down 0.3 percentage points from last month[3] Sector Analysis - Infrastructure and manufacturing investment grew by 10.4% and 8.5% respectively in the first five months of the year[3] - New energy vehicle production surged by 40.8%, while industrial robots increased by 32%[3] - Real estate sales and investment saw declines of -2.9% and -10.7% respectively in the first five months[3] Price Trends - The Producer Price Index (PPI) fell from -2.7% to -3.3% year-on-year, indicating price pressures affecting investment[3] - Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed signs of stabilization, nearing the mid-level of 2022-2024[3] Future Outlook - The economy is expected to meet the annual growth target of around 5%, but structural changes will depend on the evolution of the current economic narratives[3] - Key issues to monitor include the potential overconsumption of durable goods, export growth rates, and the government's policy responses[3]

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人| 贾东旭 摘要 核心观点：随后续政策性金融工具推出，信贷表现或趋于稳定持续走强。 5 月金融数据中最突出的变化是 M1 增速回暖，主要原因或有两点：其一，去年 "资金防空转" 政策下的低基数效应；其二，房地产销售边际回暖带 动资金注入企业端。 5月M1同比回升0.8个百分点，一方面源于去年"资金防空转"治理，使企业活期存款基数快速下降；另一方面，5月商品房成交 同比降幅收窄，部分资金转化为企业活期存款。 信贷持续性偏弱主要归因于企业部门，企业中长期贷款已连续两个月同比少增超1500亿元，这与PPI同比降幅扩大、企业未来预期不确定性仍存密切 相关。 企业投资计划与价格走势紧密相连，5月PPI同比降幅扩大至-3.3%，这或许预示着企业投资计划将进一步削减。同时，5月PMI中的企业生产 经营预期指数为也处于2024年10月以来的较低水平。 新增社会融资规模同比多增幅度收窄，主要是由于政府债净融资的基数抬升，财政融资"前置"推动社融快速改善的阶段可能已趋于结束。 社融存量 同比从2024年底的8.0%上升至8.7%，主因政府债净融资"前置" 。5月政府债净 ...

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人| 贾东旭 摘要 事件：6月13日，央行公布2025年5月中国金融数据，信贷余额同比下行0.1个百分点至7.1%，社融存量同比持平于至8.7%，M2同比下行0.1个百 分点至7.9% 。 增长同经济增长、价格总水平预期目标相匹配。 常规跟踪：M1同比回暖。 5月新增信贷6200亿，同比少增3300亿，拖累仍主要源于企业中长贷。 居民部门贷款新增540亿，同比少增217亿，其中短贷减少208亿，同比多 减451亿，中长贷新增746亿，同比多增232亿。企业部门方面，票据融资新增746亿，同比少增2826亿，短期贷款新增1100亿，同比增加2300 亿。非银贷款新增589亿，同比多增226亿。 5月新增社融22871亿，同比多增2248亿，主要源于政府债券。 人民币贷款新增5960亿，同比少增2237亿。政府债券新增14633亿，同比多增 2367亿。企业债券新增1496亿，同比多增1211亿。委托贷款减少167亿，同比多减158亿，信托贷款新增173亿，同比少增51亿，未贴现汇票减少 1162亿，同比少减169亿。 5月M2同比下行0.1个百分点至7. ...

Group 1: Financial Data Overview - In May 2025, the credit balance decreased by 0.1 percentage points to 7.1% year-on-year[1] - The total social financing stock remained flat at 8.7% year-on-year[1] - M2 growth declined by 0.1 percentage points to 7.9% year-on-year[1] Group 2: M1 Growth and Influencing Factors - M1 growth rebounded by 0.8 percentage points to 2.3% year-on-year, exceeding market expectations of 1.8%[2] - The rebound in M1 is attributed to a low base effect from last year's "funds anti-circulation" policy and a marginal recovery in real estate sales[2] - The decline in corporate medium and long-term loans has persisted for two consecutive months, with a reduction exceeding 150 billion yuan, linked to a widening decline in PPI[2] Group 3: Social Financing and Government Bonds - The growth rate of social financing stock increased from 8.0% at the end of 2024 to 8.7% due to the "front-loaded" net financing of government bonds[3] - In May, the net financing of government bonds remained high but the year-on-year increase narrowed to 236.7 billion yuan[3] - The phase of rapid improvement in social financing driven by fiscal financing may be coming to an end[3] Group 4: Credit and Loan Trends - In May, new credit amounted to 620 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 330 billion yuan, primarily due to corporate medium and long-term loans[4] - New social financing in May was 2,287.1 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 224.8 billion yuan, mainly from government bonds[4] - The structure of deposits showed that household deposits increased by 470 billion yuan, while corporate deposits decreased by 417.6 billion yuan[5]

Core Insights - The article discusses the transition into a "new phase" of transformation and a "reform period" for policies, questioning whether external shocks are obstacles or opportunities [5] - It highlights the end of the "American exceptionalism" narrative as a significant expectation gap in the first half of the year [8] - The impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy is identified as a major contradiction for the second half of the year, with a focus on inflation trends [9] Deep Dive Topics - The mid-year outlook emphasizes the need for new changes in policies, particularly regarding U.S. tariffs, tax cuts, and monetary policy, as domestic export data enters a "verification period" [11] - The article explores the emergence of new policy financial tools aimed at stabilizing growth, suggesting that these tools are becoming increasingly relevant [12][14] - The booming inbound tourism sector is analyzed, noting the expansion of visa-free access for additional countries, which is expected to have significant macroeconomic implications [15] High-Frequency Tracking - The article notes a shift in export strategies, with a transition from targeting emerging markets to focusing on the U.S. market [17] - It identifies three characteristics of stabilizing core CPI based on May inflation data [19] - The upcoming second round of U.S.-China trade negotiations is highlighted, with stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm employment data [22] Policy Updates - Recent communications between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Trump emphasize the importance of maintaining a cooperative relationship and mutual respect [27][28] - The article discusses the implications of ongoing trade negotiations with various countries, including Canada, the EU, and Mexico, and their potential outcomes [23]