- The report does not contain any information about quantitative models or factors. Therefore, no relevant content can be summarized from the provided documents.

Group 1 - The report highlights a transition from a "loose monetary + tight credit" environment to a "loose monetary + marginal credit recovery" scenario, indicating a positive outlook for the economy and equity markets in the next 1-3 quarters [1][12] - The A-share market is showing a positive trend driven by liquidity release and policy support, with significant performances from the Growth and ChiNext indices [2] - The bond market is expected to regain its allocation value due to deflationary pressures and declining interest rates, supported by a favorable monetary policy environment [3][12] Group 2 - The report suggests a focus on large-cap growth stocks due to the current economic recovery and favorable conditions for larger enterprises amid external uncertainties [17][19] - The domestic asset allocation model recommends aggressive positioning in stocks (50%), bonds (25%), oil (8.3%), and gold (16.7%) under an optimistic scenario, while a conservative scenario suggests 15% in stocks and 85% in bonds [22][23] - The report indicates that the performance of domestic assets in August was led by growth stocks, with significant returns compared to other sectors [27][34] Group 3 - The report emphasizes the importance of monitoring trade negotiations and policy directions as the market operates in a relatively high position, suggesting a stable upward trend [2] - The report provides a global asset allocation model, indicating specific allocation percentages for major global markets, with a notable emphasis on emerging markets like India and Vietnam [22][23] - The report notes that the stock-bond valuation ratio in China has been declining, suggesting a shift in investment attractiveness between these asset classes [40][43]

Report Date - The report was released on September 26, 2025, by the macro team of the research center [2] Global Asset Market Performance 10 - Year Treasury Yields of Major Economies - Yields on September 25, 2025, varied widely, from 0.180% in Switzerland to 6.103% in Brazil [3] - Yield changes showed different trends in the latest, weekly, monthly, and yearly periods. For example, the US 10 - year yield increased by 0.023 in the latest change, 0.065 in a week, - 0.034 in a month, and 0.456 in a year [3] 2 - Year Treasury Yields of Major Economies - Yields on September 25, 2025, ranged from 0.929% in Japan to 4.014% in the UK [3] - Yield changes also had diverse trends. The US 2 - year yield decreased by 0.080 in the latest change but increased by 0.020 in a week [3] Dollar Exchange Rates Against Major Emerging - Market Currencies - Exchange rates on September 25, 2025, were presented, such as 5.364 for the dollar against the Brazilian real [3] - Exchange rate changes showed fluctuations, with the dollar against the Brazilian real having a 0.61% latest change and - 0.94% monthly change [3] Major Economies' Stock Indices - Index values on September 25, 2025, were given, like 6604.720 for the S&P 500 [3] - Index changes varied. The S&P 500 had a - 0.50% latest change, - 0.41% weekly change, 1.58% monthly change, and 15.60% yearly change [3] Credit Bond Indices - Index values' latest, weekly, monthly, and yearly changes were provided. For example, the US investment - grade credit bond index had a - 0.20% latest change and 3.04% yearly change [3][4] Stock Index Futures Trading Data Index Performance - Closing prices, percentage changes, and valuations were reported. The A - share index closed at 3853.30 with a - 0.01% change, and the S&P 500 had a PE(TTM) of 27.49 [5] Fund Flows - Latest values and 5 - day average values of fund flows were shown. A - share fund flow had a latest value of - 523.88 and a 5 - day average of - 505.69 [5] Trading Volume - Latest trading volumes and their changes were presented. The trading volume of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets was 23710.90 with a 443.06 change [5] Basis and Spread - Basis and spread percentages of IF, IH, and IC were given. IF had a basis of - 31.29 and a spread of - 0.68% [5] Treasury Bond Futures Trading Data - Closing prices and percentage changes of T00, TF00, T01, and TF01 were reported. T00 closed at 107.610 with a - 0.06% change [6] - Interest rates and their daily changes of R001, R007, and SHIBOR - 3M were provided. R001 had an interest rate of 1.5191% with a - 19.00 BP change [6]

首先我们看一下三季度债券市场调整的主因，其实就是我们前面提到的随着权益市场上涨带来的市场风 险偏好的上行，其中会有部分资金去做大类资产配置的切换，进而从债券市场转向权益市场。在这个过 程中我们其实发现，不同于过往的几轮权益市场的牛市，在这一轮权益市场"慢牛"的行情中，居民的存 款搬家从固收类转向权益类的迹象不是特别明显。我们理解对于大部分居民而言，他其实寻找的更多的 还是稳定的、并且收益相对比较可观的资产，就导致在权益走慢牛的趋势下，其实很多资金还是更愿意 去配置在三季度调整过后相对有配置价值的债券类资产。 第二点就是在7月份中央财经委提到的反内卷政策下，三季度多种商品出现了触底反弹，包括定价国内 需求的一些黑色商品，也包括这两年相对产能比较过剩的一些光伏产业的上游资产。我们发现其实在三 季度反内卷政策推行的过程中，更多的是政策层对于供给层面的一些约束。我们看到光伏产业部分头部 的企业去注资成立公司，然后去做部分产能的收储，并且去淘汰一些落后的、过剩的产能。而在化工领 域、黑色领域部分限产也引发了上游原材料价格的上涨。 我们想强调的是，在经济转型的过程中，反内卷政策更多还是依托于供给侧去做一些产能方面的严控， ...

Economic Overview - In August, the industrial added value increased by 5.2% year-on-year, slightly down from 5.7% in July, but still above 5%[5] - The manufacturing sector's added value grew by 5.7%, outpacing overall industrial growth by 0.5 percentage points, with 31 out of 41 industrial categories showing year-on-year growth, resulting in a growth coverage of 75.6%[5] - High-tech manufacturing saw a significant expansion, with added value increasing by 9.3% year-on-year, indicating strong momentum in emerging industries[5] Investment Trends - From January to August, fixed asset investment grew by only 0.5% year-on-year, a decline from 1.6% in the previous period, with real estate being a major drag[5] - Manufacturing investment rose by 5.1%, significantly higher than the overall investment growth, with notable increases in consumer goods manufacturing (9.0%) and aerospace manufacturing (28.0%)[5] - Real estate development investment fell by 12.9% year-on-year, with August alone seeing a 19.5% decline, marking the largest monthly drop of the year[6] Consumer Behavior - Retail sales of consumer goods increased by 3.4% year-on-year in August, with significant growth in home appliances (14.3%) and furniture (18.6%) despite a slight overall slowdown[6] - The penetration rate of new energy vehicles reached over 50%, with August retail sales showing a positive shift to +0.8% from -1.5% in July[6] Market Outlook - The economic recovery momentum is expected to continue, with GDP growth projected to meet the target of around 5% for the year, despite a forecasted slowdown in Q3 compared to Q2[6] - A-shares typically exhibit a "pre-holiday contraction, post-holiday surge" pattern, with over 60% probability of index gains following the National Day holiday[7] Fixed Income Strategy - The bond market is currently experiencing fluctuations, with short-term credit spreads narrowing while long-term spreads are widening, indicating a mixed market sentiment[7] - The average duration of bank TPL (Total Portfolio Loss) is estimated at 3 years, with projected floating losses of approximately 453 billion yuan for Q3 due to rising long-term bond yields[9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the growing importance of bond ETFs in the current investment landscape, particularly for bank wealth management companies facing an "asset shortage" and seeking refined investment management tools [1][3]. - The recent launch of the second batch of 14 sci-tech bond ETFs has increased the total number of such products to 24, indicating a significant uptick in market interest and investment [1][2]. - As of September 24, the total scale of the first batch of sci-tech bond ETFs reached 128.57 billion, with several products exceeding 15 billion, showcasing robust demand and growth in this sector [1][2]. Group 2 - Wealth management funds have become a crucial driver of the growth in sci-tech bond ETF scales, with institutions like Xingyin Wealth and Zhaoyin Wealth actively participating in the market [2][3]. - The dual considerations of optimizing asset allocation and enhancing liquidity are key reasons why bank wealth management funds favor bond ETFs, allowing for diversified and efficient investment strategies [3][4]. - Bond ETFs offer superior liquidity compared to other fixed-income assets, with mechanisms such as T+0 trading and the ability to pledge for financing, making them attractive to institutional investors [4][5]. Group 3 - The article warns of potential market volatility due to "coupon-snatching" behavior by institutions, which may lead to mispricing of component bonds within the ETFs [4][6]. - The rapid influx of new capital into credit bond ETFs has created a "snatching" phenomenon, where institutions preemptively purchase related component bonds, leading to increased trading activity and turnover rates [5][6]. - Analysts caution about the re-pricing risks associated with component bonds of sci-tech bond ETFs, particularly in a volatile market environment where large sell-offs could exacerbate losses [6].

Core Viewpoint - The global asset allocation is likely to continue shifting towards gold due to various economic factors and geopolitical tensions, with expectations of further liquidity easing in the U.S. market [1][2][4]. Group 1: Market Analysis - Galaxy Futures indicates that Powell's remarks suggest a tight monetary policy, interpreted by the market as opening space for further rate cuts, maintaining high expectations for U.S. liquidity easing [1]. - The latest PMI data points to resilience in the U.S. economy, which may alleviate concerns about economic slowdown, although profit-taking is observed near historical highs in precious metals [1]. - The demand for precious metals, particularly gold and silver, is increasing, driven by ongoing conflicts between the Federal Reserve and the Trump administration, which is reigniting upward momentum in gold prices [4]. Group 2: Price Predictions - Scotiabank forecasts that gold could reach $4,800 per ounce next year under optimistic conditions, with a near-term target of $3,800 and support levels at $3,650 and $3,550 [4]. - Jefferies' Christopher Wood predicts that gold prices could touch $6,600 per ounce, based on historical bull markets and U.S. disposable income analysis, indicating a potential increase of over 76% from current levels [5]. Group 3: Economic Indicators - The recent U.S. PPI data falling below expectations supports the notion of Federal Reserve easing, with market expectations fully pricing in rate cuts starting in September and three cuts within the year [2]. - Political uncertainties, including the collapse of the French government and the resignation of Japan's Prime Minister, are heightening risk aversion, benefiting gold prices [2][4].

Report Overview - Report Title: Global Asset Market Performance - Major Asset Morning Report - Report Date: September 24, 2025 - Research Team: Macro Team of the Research Center 1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Report's Core View - The report presents the performance data of various global asset markets on September 23, 2025, including 10 - year and 2 - year government bond yields of major economies, exchange rates of the US dollar against major emerging - economy currencies, major economy stock indices, credit bond indices, stock index futures trading data, and government bond futures trading data. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Global Asset Market Performance - Bond Yields - **10 - Year Government Bond Yields**: On September 23, 2025, the 10 - year government bond yields of the US, UK, France, etc. were 4.107%, 4.679%, 3.563% respectively. The latest changes ranged from - 0.041 (US) to 0.004 (France), with weekly changes from - 0.030 (Switzerland) to 0.078 (US), monthly changes from - 0.155 (US) to 0.065 (France), and annual changes from - 0.220 (Switzerland) to 0.912 (UK) [2]. - **2 - Year Government Bond Yields**: On September 23, 2025, the 2 - year government bond yields of the US, UK, Germany, etc. were 3.570%, 3.950%, 2.019% respectively. The latest changes ranged from 0.000 (US, Japan) to 0.011 (South Korea), with weekly changes from - 0.014 (China 1Y) to 0.058 (Japan), monthly changes from - 0.012 (UK) to 0.084 (Germany), and annual changes from - 0.432 (South Korea) to 0.544 (Japan) [2]. 3.2 Global Asset Market Performance - Exchange Rates - **US Dollar against Major Emerging - Economy Currencies**: On September 23, 2025, the exchange rates of the US dollar against the Brazilian real, South African rand, etc. were 5.282, 17.245 respectively. The latest changes ranged from - 0.99% (Brazil) to 0.24% (South Korean won), with weekly changes from - 0.54% (South African rand) to 1.09% (South Korean won), monthly changes from - 2.75% (Brazil) to 0.05% (South Korean won), and annual changes from - 5.07% (Brazil) to 4.58% (South Korean won) [2]. - **Renminbi**: On September 23, 2025, the on - shore RMB, off - shore RMB, and the central parity rate were 7.113, 7.113, 7.106 respectively. The latest changes were - 0.02%, - 0.03%, - 0.07% respectively, with weekly changes of - 0.02%, 0.12%, 0.04% respectively, monthly changes of - 0.55%, - 0.56%, - 0.18% respectively, and annual changes of 0.23%, 0.18%, 0.04% respectively [2]. 3.3 Global Asset Market Performance - Stock Indices - **Major Economy Stock Indices**: On September 23, 2025, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and NASDAQ were 6656.920, 46292.780, 22573.470 respectively. The latest changes ranged from - 0.95% (NASDAQ) to 0.59% (Mexican stock index), with weekly changes from - 0.03% (Spanish stock index) to 1.21% (German DAX), monthly changes from - 2.24% (German DAX) to 7.29% (Mexican stock index), and annual changes from 5.45% (French CAC) to 31.35% (Spanish stock index) [2]. 3.4 Global Asset Market Performance - Credit Bond Indices - **Credit Bond Indices**: The latest changes of the US investment - grade credit bond index, euro - zone investment - grade credit bond index, etc. ranged from - 0.03% (euro - zone investment - grade credit bond index) to 0.40% (emerging - economy high - yield credit bond index), with weekly changes from - 0.39% (US investment - grade credit bond index) to 0.27% (euro - zone high - yield credit bond index), monthly changes from 0.26% (euro - zone investment - grade credit bond index) to 1.61% (US investment - grade credit bond index), and annual changes from 3.66% (US investment - grade credit bond index) to 13.30% (emerging - economy high - yield credit bond index) [2][3]. 3.5 Stock Index Futures Trading Data - **Index Performance**: The closing prices of A - shares, CSI 300, SSE 50, etc. were 3821.83, 4519.78, 2919.51 respectively, with changes of - 0.18%, - 0.06%, - 0.09% respectively [4]. - **Valuation**: The PE (TTM) of the CSI 300, SSE 50, and CSI 500 were 14.01, 11.64, 34.17 respectively, with环比 changes of 0.04, 0.07, - 0.25 respectively [4]. - **Fund Flow**: The latest values of the fund flow of A - shares, the main board, and small - and medium - sized enterprise boards were - 1566.78, - 1050.60, etc., with 5 - day average values of - 1037.14, - 806.14, etc. respectively [4]. - **Trading Volume**: The latest trading volumes of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets, CSI 300, and SSE 50 were 24943.82, 6805.14, 1689.87 respectively, with环比 changes of 3728.99, 1173.65, 125.86 respectively [4]. - **Main Contract Premium/Discount**: The basis of IF, IH, and IC were - 35.98, 5.49, - 240.11 respectively, with premiums/discounts of - 0.80%, 0.19%, - 3.34% respectively [4]. 3.6 Government Bond Futures Trading Data - **Government Bond Futures**: The closing prices of T00, TF00, T01, and TF01 were 107.715, 105.625, 107.385, 105.505 respectively, with changes of 0.13%, 0.09%, 0.12%, 0.09% respectively [5]. - **Funding Rates**: The funding rates of R001, R007, and SHIBOR - 3M were 1.4619%, 1.5218%, 1.5620% respectively, with daily changes of - 7.00 BP, - 1.00 BP, 0.00 BP respectively [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of the Permanent Portfolio proposed by Harry Browne, which consists of 25% stocks, 25% long-term government bonds, 25% gold, and 25% cash, and questions its viability in the current high valuation environment of these asset classes [1][7]. Investment Portfolio Analysis - The expected return of the Permanent Portfolio may only be around 5%, with potential losses in unfavorable years, as stocks are the primary source of returns, and their contribution is limited due to the 25% allocation [1]. - Concerns are raised about the long-term performance of gold, long-term government bonds, and cash, questioning the ability to hold these assets without significant returns or facing purchasing power erosion [1][5]. Alternative Portfolio Suggestions - Some investors suggest adjusting the asset allocation, increasing equity exposure to 50% while considering the realities of the Chinese stock market, and replacing ordinary stocks with convertible bonds or stocks with cash options to mitigate risks during bear markets [4]. - The idea of not maintaining a fixed cash allocation is proposed, allowing for opportunistic adjustments based on market conditions [5]. Personalization of Investment Strategies - The article emphasizes the importance of personalizing investment strategies rather than strictly adhering to Browne's model, suggesting that investors can adapt the framework to include commodities, digital currencies, and internal asset rotation [8]. - It highlights the potential for leveraging strategies using futures and options to enhance returns while maintaining a diversified portfolio [8]. Conclusion - The article concludes that while Browne's framework provides a foundational approach to asset allocation, investors should feel free to modify it according to their risk tolerance, market conditions, and investment goals [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent rise of A-shares above 3800 points presents an opportunity for investors to reassess their portfolios, emphasizing the importance of a diversified asset allocation strategy to navigate market volatility and potential downturns [4][6]. Group 1: Market Sentiment and Fund Performance - Despite the current bullish market sentiment and many funds reaching historical highs, a significant number of investors redeemed their holdings before the market's upswing, leading to missed opportunities [6]. - Data indicates that from 2022 to 2024, the net subscription scale of equity funds has continuously shrunk, with net redemptions peaking in the first quarter and fourth quarter of 2024 [6]. Group 2: Volatility and Historical Performance - The Shanghai Composite Index has a compound annual growth rate of 11.6% since its inception in 1990, but it also has an annualized volatility of 43.71%, which is significantly higher than many global indices [10][11]. - Since 2014, the annual maximum drawdown for the CSI 300 and equity fund indices has exceeded 15% in about 60% of the years, highlighting the challenges of long-term holding for domestic investors [12]. Group 3: Timing Strategies and Their Challenges - The desire to time the market is common among investors, but the reality often leads to missed opportunities, as evidenced by the significant drop in annualized returns when missing the best-performing days [16][18]. - From 2014 to the present, maintaining a position in equity funds yields an average annual return of around 15%, but missing the top-performing days drastically reduces this return [16][18]. Group 4: Asset Allocation Strategies - Given the high volatility of the A-share market, a diversified asset allocation strategy is recommended to mitigate risks and enhance returns [22]. - Different asset classes exhibit varying risk-return characteristics, and combining low or negatively correlated assets can help reduce overall portfolio volatility [22][24]. Group 5: Simulation of Asset Allocation - Simulations show that adjusting the asset allocation to include dividend stocks and global indices can lead to smoother net value curves and reduced drawdowns during market downturns [30][32]. - Incorporating bonds into the asset mix further stabilizes the portfolio, increasing the likelihood of maintaining positions during market fluctuations [35][37]. Group 6: Importance of Diversification - Diversification in asset allocation is emphasized as a crucial strategy for investors, with notable figures in finance advocating for a mix of uncorrelated return streams to enhance portfolio performance [38].