1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core Views of the Report - 4Q25 macro - tone is generally favorable for precious metals, but price volatility is expected to increase. Market expectations of interest - rate cut rhythm, economic outlook interpretations, and supply bottlenecks of platinum and palladium will drive price fluctuations and asset performance differentiation [13]. - For non - ferrous metals, the contradiction lies in whether macro - level benefits can offset micro - level demand weakness and supply contradictions. Prices are expected to fluctuate widely between the bottom range provided by macro - level easing expectations and the top range formed by industrial fundamentals pressure [2][45]. - The core drivers of black commodities will revolve around policy uncertainty and demand effectiveness. Prices are supported in the early stage but face significant downward risks in the middle and later stages of the quarter [3][57]. - The core contradiction of energy and chemical commodities is whether macro - level easing expectations can offset the fundamental pressure at the bottom of the industrial cycle. 4Q25 will be a bottom - grinding process [4][76]. - For agricultural products, export - country control measures may create artificial supply shortages and upward price risks, while import - country procurement rhythms, quota management, and domestic substitution policies form downward price pressure. La Nina - induced supply contraction expectations and current supply pressures and weak global macro - demand will drive price trends [5][91]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Precious Metals: Risks after the Interest - Rate Cut "Boot Drops" - **Monetary Policy Path Risk**: The Fed's interest - rate cut in September started a new round of easing, but the rhythm, depth, and end - point of the subsequent path are uncertain. Hawkish risks (slower - than - expected rate cuts) will push up the US dollar index and real yields of US Treasuries, negatively affecting precious metals. Dovish risks (faster - than - expected rate cuts) will be a major positive for all precious metals [13][23][26]. - **Economic "Landing" Form Risk**: The market will sway among "soft landing", "hard landing", and premature recovery scenarios in 4Q25. A "soft landing" is beneficial for the precious - metal sector as a whole. A "hard landing" will lead to significant differentiation within the sector, with gold rising and silver, platinum, and palladium potentially falling. Premature recovery trading may cause gold to face pressure while silver and platinum may benefit [29][30][31]. - **Supply - Side and Geopolitical Risk**: Supply - side risks mainly affect platinum and palladium due to their concentrated production in South Africa and Russia. Any production interruption in these countries can cause price surges. Geopolitical risks will increase the volatility of gold and silver, with gold having a more sustainable safe - haven premium [33][35]. - **Structural Market Dynamic Change Risk**: The sustainability of central - bank gold - buying demand is in doubt. The "platinum - for - palladium" substitution in the automotive industry is a long - term negative for palladium and a positive for platinum. Speculative funds in the precious - metal market are profit - seeking and volatile, which can amplify price fluctuations [37][42][44]. 3.2 Non - Ferrous Metals: Macro - Level Benefits and Industrial Weakness Risks - **Macro - Economic Narrative Risk**: The Fed's interest - rate cut provides support for non - ferrous metals, but different economic scenarios ("soft landing", "hard landing", and premature recovery) will have different impacts on non - ferrous metals. A "soft landing" is beneficial for copper, aluminum, and lithium to different extents. A "hard landing" will hit all industrial non - ferrous metals. Premature recovery trading will bring a "Davis double - click" for copper and aluminum [45][46][47]. - **Sino - Foreign Policy - Level Risk**: China's "anti - involution" policies may affect the supply of polysilicon, industrial silicon, and potentially copper and aluminum. Trade frictions, political instability in Guinea, and lithium - mine supply risks in Africa also pose threats to non - ferrous metals [50][52]. - **Supply - Side Bottleneck Risk**: Global copper - mine supply is tight, which is a strong support for copper prices. The resumption time of some lithium mines in China is uncertain, which creates two - way risks for lithium prices [53][55]. 3.3 Black Commodities: Policy Game and Demand Downturn Risks - **Downstream Demand Structural Differentiation and Total Slowdown Risk**: The real - estate industry's weakness suppresses the demand for construction steel and the entire black - commodity chain. The manufacturing industry provides support for plate - type steel, but its demand may face challenges in 4Q25. Infrastructure investment may also slow down, affecting the demand for construction steel [58][59][60]. - **Supply - Side Policy Risk**: The implementation of the "flat - control" policy for crude - steel production is uncertain. Strict implementation will benefit steel prices but harm raw - material prices, while non - implementation or under - implementation will lead to supply - surplus pressure on steel prices [66]. - **Raw - Material Supply - Side Structural Risk**: Iron - ore supply is expected to increase seasonally, which may lead to price declines. Coking - coal supply, especially for high - quality coking coal, is tight, which supports coking - coal and coke prices and squeezes steel - mill profits [70][71]. - **Inventory and Market Structural Risk**: Steel inventories face a cyclical inflection point. If post - holiday demand is weak, it will lead to passive inventory accumulation and price declines. Iron - ore port inventories may accumulate, which will pressure iron - ore prices [74]. 3.4 Energy and Chemicals: Long - Term Capacity Clearance and Prolonged Bottom - Grinding Risks - **Geopolitical and Supply - Side Seasonal Risk**: Geopolitical risks, such as the situation in the Red Sea and OPEC+ production policies, can affect oil prices. In winter, natural - gas supply shortages in Iran may increase methanol prices, and LPG supply may also be affected [77][81]. - **Inventory Level and Industrial - Chain Internal Profit Risk**: The global crude - oil market is expected to enter a stocking phase in 4Q25, which may put downward pressure on oil prices. High inventories of some chemicals, such as methanol and LPG, will suppress their prices. Profit - distribution contradictions in the chemical industrial chain are intensifying [83][84][87]. - **Structural Over - Capacity and Industry Profit - Cycle Risk**: The chemical industry is in a long - term over - capacity situation. Polyolefins, methanol, and LPG are severely affected. The process of capacity clearance is slow, and the low - price, low - profit industry pattern will persist [89][90]. 3.5 Agricultural Products: Risks under Policy and Weather Interference - **Key Countries' Policy Risk**: Export - control measures of major agricultural - product exporters can cause price surges, while import - country policies, such as China's procurement and quota management, can limit price increases [92]. - **Terminal Demand Weakness Risk**: Global economic slowdown weakens consumer purchasing power, affecting the demand for cotton, oils, sugars, and feed raw materials. China's internal demand also has structural risks, and changes in bio - fuel policies can affect the demand for corn and vegetable oils [98][100][103]. - **Global Supply Cycle Risk**: The concentrated listing of Northern - Hemisphere autumn - harvest crops brings short - term supply pressure. The long - term supply situation is affected by policies and climate [91]. - **Global Climate Risk**: The evolution towards La Nina poses risks to the upcoming Southern - Hemisphere sowing season and Southeast - Asian production [91].

2025年9月22日，亚洲时区，比特币市场如同被突如其来的急刹车甩入前座，屏幕上血红的K线与交易 群里"冲冲冲"的呐喊形成鲜明对比，两种极端情绪的碰撞，预示着一场不同寻常的动荡。加密货币的领 头羊，比特币，在11.4万美元附近瞬间崩盘，短短几分钟内，市值蒸发大半。期货市场上，17亿美元的 多头头寸顷刻间化为乌有，强平提示如狂风暴雨般涌来。 "这是不是一个拐点？"群里有人抛出疑问，我却不动声色地回复："别急，先看谁先认输，再看谁补 仓。市场节奏已非上周的直线冲刺。" 三天后的9月26日，高盛的分析师Paolo Schiavone在一份内部报告中，一针见血地指出了市场的变化。 他认为，过去三周，风险偏好如同踩了氮气加速，动量策略表现强劲，但本周的节拍已然改变。他将周 一那记"急刹车"定性为第一个真正的信号，并强调，比特币此次已不再是跟随者，而是领头羊。他的原 话更是尖锐："跌破200日均线，风险便会陡增。" 事后复盘，盘后数据显示，10.9万美元附近出现了承接的现货买盘，挂单如同精心守护的防线。技术派 将其视为支撑，而情绪派则称之为"护城河"。当天晚些时候，以太坊及主流山寨币也未能幸免，纷纷出 现下滑。社交媒体上 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. labor market is showing signs of cooling, with August non-farm payrolls increasing by only 22,000, significantly below the expected 77,000, indicating a potential economic slowdown [1][7][28]. Group 1: Employment Data - In August, the private sector added 38,000 jobs, also below the expected 78,000, while the government sector saw a decrease of 16,000 jobs [1][7]. - The healthcare sector contributed the most to job growth, adding 31,000 positions, while manufacturing and professional services sectors experienced declines [8][9]. - The unemployment rate rose slightly to 4.32%, with long-term unemployment (over 27 weeks) increasing by 385,000 year-on-year, indicating challenges in re-employment for certain demographics [3][12][13]. Group 2: Wage and Hour Data - Average hourly earnings increased by 3.7% year-on-year, down from 3.9% in the previous month, suggesting a moderation in wage growth [3][16]. - The total payroll index showed a year-on-year increase of 5.0%, indicating stable wage growth but with signs of slowing momentum [16][17]. - Average weekly hours remained unchanged at 34.2 hours, reflecting cautious hiring practices among employers [16][17]. Group 3: Economic Outlook - The current employment data suggests a typical post-cycle economic characteristic, with signs of a cooling labor market [4][18]. - Historical analysis indicates that significant negative shifts in non-farm payrolls often correlate with economic recessions, with a 67% success rate in predicting downturns [4][20]. - The Federal Reserve may consider interest rate cuts as a response to the weakening labor market, with market expectations indicating high probabilities for rate cuts in the coming months [5][6][28]. Group 4: Market Reactions - Market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts are high, with probabilities of 92%, 72.6%, and 67.9% for September, October, and December respectively [6][28]. - U.S. Treasury yields have declined, with the 10-year yield falling to 4.07%, and the dollar index has also retreated [6][28]. - Gold prices have risen significantly as a safe-haven asset, while U.S. stock indices showed mixed performance, with small-cap stocks outperforming [6][28].

Group 1 - The report indicates that July economic data shows downward pressure, with non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations but structural weaknesses evident, and domestic demand components significantly declining [3][4][73] - The report highlights that the U.S. stock market reached new historical highs in July, while U.S. Treasury yields experienced a notable rebound [4][13] - The report suggests that the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield may reach a new low of 3.6%, breaking the previous low of 3.8% in April [3][7] Group 2 - The report notes that the total issuance of U.S. Treasuries in July was $2.51 trillion, an increase from the previous month's $2.3 trillion [19][20] - It mentions that the demand for U.S. Treasuries has weakened marginally due to the lower attractiveness of U.S. Treasury yields compared to European and Japanese government bonds after currency hedging costs [7][21] - The report states that the issuance of short-term Treasury bills (T-Bills) increased significantly, with a total issuance of $2.37 trillion in July, compared to $1.62 trillion in June [20][27] Group 3 - The report discusses the macroeconomic environment, indicating that the FOMC maintained the policy rate at 4%-4.25% during the July meeting, reflecting a more cautious outlook on economic uncertainty [62][63] - It highlights that the labor market remains resilient, with non-farm payrolls adding 147,000 jobs in June, surpassing expectations [73][79] - The report emphasizes that inflationary pressures are expected to remain moderate, with the CPI rising by 0.3% month-on-month in June, aligning with expectations [73][74] Group 4 - The report outlines the strategy for the U.S. Treasury market, recommending specific instruments such as TLT, TMF, and 10-year and above Treasury futures [3][7] - It suggests that the current economic conditions may lead to a "soft landing," but if the Federal Reserve misjudges inflation, it could result in a "hard landing" scenario [106] - The report indicates that the Treasury market is expected to experience high volatility due to ongoing economic pressures and potential shifts in monetary policy [7][49]

Core Insights - A significant shift in investor sentiment regarding economic recession concerns has been observed, with 59% of investors now believing a recession is unlikely [1] - The report indicates that this represents a major change from April, when only 42% of respondents felt a recession was unlikely [1] - Approximately 65% of investors anticipate a "soft landing" for the economy, characterized by a slowdown in inflation without a significant economic downturn [1] - Only 9% of investors expect a "hard landing," where inflation decreases alongside a slowdown or recession in the economy [1]

Group 1 - The U.S. ADP employment report for June unexpectedly showed a loss of 33,000 jobs, challenging the narrative of a robust labor market [1] - The government announced plans to cut nearly 290,000 federal positions this year, adding pressure to an already tight labor market [1] - Job search activity for positions such as policy analysts has surged tenfold year-over-year, indicating increased competition among job seekers [1] Group 2 - The shift of stable government employees to the private sector may dilute already slowing hiring demand, potentially leading to downward pressure on wages for knowledge-based positions [3] - If public sector wages, seen as a stabilizing factor, decline, it could negatively impact mortgage payments and durable goods orders, affecting consumer spending [3] - The bond market reacted with the ten-year yield dropping below 4.1%, indicating a flight to safety, while consumer staples and utilities showed slight gains amidst pressure on banks, construction, and small tech stocks [3] Group 3 - A true turning point in the labor market may require three signals: consecutive negative private sector job additions, a reduction in average hours worked, and initial jobless claims surpassing post-pandemic highs [3] - If these conditions are met, the anticipated "soft landing" for the economy could shift to a "hard reality" [3] - In the interim, a prudent strategy involves reducing concentrated bets, using high-dividend assets to hedge against volatility, and adjusting positions based on rolling data [3]

【5 月 13 日沪铜主力合约市场动态】5 月 13 日，沪铜主力合约开盘价 78080 元/吨，最高 78190 元/ 吨，最低 77620 元/吨，收盘价78090 元/吨，跌幅 0.19%。全天成交量 9.1 万手，减仓 3.4 万手。持仓量 18.2 万手，减仓 0.6 万手。 宏观方面，中美关税问题谈判有进展，市场避险情绪降温。美国银行调研显 示，26%的基金经理认为将硬着陆，低于 4 月的 49%。 供给上，铜精矿供应紧张。虽技术进步和勘探 能力提升，新矿源开发加快，但短期内全球铜精矿供应增量有限，相对铜冶炼产能增长，供应有较大缺 口，冶炼厂竞争加剧，进口矿加工费下行压力大，利润承压。 需求方面，SMM预计 5 月精铜杆企业开 工率环比下滑至 71.01%，下滑 2.83 个百分点，同比上升 8.17 个百分点。5 月漆包线行业开工率预计为 69.81%，环比下降 6.98 个百分点。4 月中国主流光伏组件企业光伏组件产量 55GW，环比上涨 3.38%， 同比持平。4 月光伏组件国内企业产能开工率 56.1%。Mysteel 预计 2025 年 5 月光伏组件排产约 52GW，环比下降 5.45 ...

该银行在中美贸易会谈前进行的调查显示，基金经理净减持了38%的美国股票，这是两年来最高水平。 但由于投资者对股票的风险敞口很低，市场参与者警告称，持续的股市上涨将使看跌头寸蒙受巨额损 失。同时，在已经高企的水平上追涨可能会给交易员带来更多痛苦。 投资者对5月份全球经济增长的悲观情绪有所缓解。净59%的投资者预计全球经济增长将放缓，低于4月 份的82%。净1%的人认为可能出现衰退，较4月份的42%大幅下降。投资者目前的共识是软着陆，即通 胀下降，而经济不会明显放缓或陷入衰退。本月，61%的投资者预计会出现这种结果，高于4月份的 37%，对硬着陆的预期已从4月份的49%降至26%。 43%的投资者将贸易战列为最有可能引发系统性信贷危机的因素。第二个最有可能的来源是美国的影子 银行，占比25%。美国银行在调查的同时发布的一份新闻稿中说，中美经贸会谈成果"防止了经济衰退 或信贷事件"。这项调查是在周一宣布削减关税之前进行的。 对于美股，美国银行策略师表示，在美国和中国达成贸易休战引发股市上涨后，投资者可能被迫追涨， 因为他们在上月的反弹中大部分错失了机会。 美国股市因贸易战出现缓和迹象而持续反弹。标普500指数较其2 ...

美银调查显示，投资者对全球经济增长的悲观情绪有所缓解 金十数据5月13日讯，美国银行对全球基金经理的月度调查显示，投资者对5月份全球经济增长的悲观情 绪有所缓解。净59%的投资者预计全球经济增长将放缓，低于4月份的82%。净1%的人认为可能出现衰 退，较4月份的42%大幅下降。投资者目前的共识是软着陆，即通胀下降，而经济不会明显放缓或陷入 衰退。本月，61%的投资者预计会出现这种结果，高于4月份的37%。，对硬着陆的预期已从4月份的 49%降至26%。 ...

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry Overview - The discussion revolves around the U.S. stock market and its historical volatility, particularly focusing on significant market shocks in 1987, 2008, and 2020, as well as current market conditions influenced by tariffs and AI technology advancements [1][3][4]. Core Insights and Arguments - **Historical Market Shocks**: - The 1987 Black Monday was characterized by a rapid depreciation of the U.S. dollar post-Plaza Accord, Federal Reserve interest rate hikes, and a stock market bubble, leading to a single-day drop of over 20% in both the Dow Jones and S&P 500 [1][3]. - The 2008 financial crisis was driven by a housing market bubble fueled by subprime loans, resulting in a liquidity crisis after Lehman Brothers' collapse, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones experiencing maximum drawdowns close to 40% [1][3]. - The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant economic downturn, with real GDP growth dropping to -7.5% and manufacturing PMI at 41.5, leading to four circuit breakers triggered within ten days and maximum drawdowns of 35% and 38% for the S&P 500 and Dow Jones, respectively [1][3]. - **Current Market Conditions**: - In April 2023, the U.S. stock market experienced volatility primarily due to Trump's tariff policies and internal reforms, raising concerns about a potential hard landing for the U.S. economy and geopolitical risks, which led to a surge in safe-haven assets like gold and Bitcoin [4][5]. - Following the announcement of tariffs on April 2, the S&P 500 saw a maximum decline of 12%, while the Nasdaq dropped 13%, with rising U.S. Treasury yields reflecting negative market sentiment towards these policies [5]. - **Future Market Influences**: - The future of the U.S. stock market may be influenced by two main factors: the real impact of tariff policies on the macroeconomy, which remains uncertain and could lead to stagflation or a hard landing, thereby exerting negative pressure on the stock market [6]. - The rapid expansion of the AI industry, exemplified by breakthroughs like ChatGPT, may provide support for stock market performance, as U.S. tech giants hold a first-mover advantage in this sector [2][6]. Other Important Insights - The discussion highlights the cyclical nature of market volatility and the interplay between macroeconomic policies and technological advancements, suggesting that investors should remain vigilant about both economic indicators and industry trends [1][6].