证券研究报告 固收 2025 年 11 月 23 日│中国内地 利率周报 华泰研究 张继强 研究员 zhangjiqiang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 仇文竹* 研究员 SAC No. S0570521050002 qiuwenzhu@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 吴宇航* 研究员 SAC No. S0570521090004 wuyuhang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 欧阳琳* 研究员 SAC No. S0570525070010 ouyanglin@htsc.com "五组利率比价关系"的启示 朱逸敏* 联系人 SAC No. S0570124070133 zhuyimin@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 央行政策利率和市场利率的关系 央行政策利率与市场利率的关系主要关注两个维度：1）OMO→资金利率→ 同业存单/短端国债利率： 5 月以来，DR001 资金利率回到政策利率附近波 动。向后看，央行几大目标更为均衡，资金面大概率延续平稳，货币市场利 率与 OMO 利差预计稳定且延续低位。2）OMO→ ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content 2. Core View of the Report - The current bond market is in a pricing dilemma with long - term interest rates remaining flat, making band - trading difficult. Investors are turning to coupon assets. Seeking relatively cost - effective assets may be a better choice[1][10] - Focus on varieties and entities with large yield increases but slow repair processes during the July - November bond market adjustment - repair cycle, as they may experience a catch - up rally[2][10] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Credit Market Performance Analysis - From November 10 - 14, interest - rate bonds fluctuated narrowly, and the yield curve flattened. General credit bonds performed weakly with most credit spreads widening slightly. Bank secondary and perpetual (two - Yong) bonds had a catch - up rally, outperforming general credit bonds[9] - For general credit bonds, medium - to high - grade long - term varieties were severely affected and repaired slowly during the bond market adjustment. From July 7 to November 14, the yields of 7 - 15 - year AAA and AA+ urban investment bonds increased significantly by 25 - 40bp, and credit spreads widened by 6 - 10bp, with 30 - year spreads widening by 12 - 14bp[2][10] - Some private and perpetual bonds had weaker performance than ordinary bonds during the adjustment - repair cycle, with higher current variety spreads. There are opportunities to obtain higher coupons by sacrificing some liquidity[3][14] 3.2 Investment Opportunity Recommendations - For general credit bonds, pay attention to medium - to high - grade long - term varieties and some issuers of 2 - 3 - year or 3 - 5 - year credit bonds with large yield adjustments[2][12] - Focus on entities with excess returns in perpetual bonds. 37 entities were screened based on certain criteria such as implicit rating, bond stock, average yield, and variety spread[3][16] - Bank two - Yong bonds still have cost - effectiveness compared to general credit bonds. However, they face challenges due to the unimplemented new regulations on fund sales fees and are more suitable for accounts with relatively stable liability ends or those insensitive to drawdowns[3][18] - Three - year medium - to high - grade securities company subordinated bonds have a coupon advantage over the same - term and same - grade bank secondary capital bonds, suitable for accounts with low liquidity requirements[5][20] 3.3 Specific Bond Type Analysis 3.3.1 Urban Investment Bonds - From November 1 - 16, 2025, urban investment bond net financing was negative, and the outflow scale increased. The issuance rate dropped significantly to a historical low. In the secondary market, the 3 - 5 - year market cooled, and credit spreads widened slightly[26][27] 3.3.2 Industrial Bonds - In November, industrial bond issuance and net financing increased year - on - year. The 3 - 5 - year issuance proportion increased significantly, and the issuance rate declined across the board, with a larger decline in the 3 - 5 - year segment[34][35]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - Not mentioned in the report Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - The concentrated opening of amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds may directly benefit general credit bonds, and the spread of general credit bonds may decline. After the opening of these funds drives up the price of general credit bonds, the medium - and long - term cost - performance of secondary perpetual bonds will be passively improved, attracting medium - and long - term allocation funds such as annuities and insurance companies, with the market of secondary perpetual bonds lagging behind that of general credit bonds [2][26][27]. - The concentrated opening of amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds may form a strong allocation demand for 3 - 5Y medium - and long - term credit bonds [20][30]. Group 3: Summary According to the Directory 1. Changes in the Holding Varieties of Amortized Fixed - Term Open - End Bond Funds - Since the beginning of 2024, the proportion of interest - rate bonds (especially policy - financial bonds) held by amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds has significantly decreased, while the proportion of general credit bonds has increased substantially. From 2024Q1 - 2025Q3, the proportion of financial bonds held decreased from 89% to 78% (the proportion of policy - financial bonds decreased from 73% to 61%), and the proportion of credit bonds increased from 2% to 14% [8]. - The proportion of medium - term notes held by amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds has steadily increased. From the perspectives of implicit rating and remaining term, the proportion of credit bonds with an implicit rating of AAA - and above and a remaining term of 3 - 5 years has significantly increased. The proportion of medium - term notes increased from 43% in 2024Q1 to 61% in 2025Q3, the proportion of high - grade bonds increased, and the proportion of credit bonds with a remaining term of 1 year or less decreased from 80% in 2024Q3 to 30% in 2025Q3, while the proportion of 3 - 5Y credit bonds increased to 42% in 2025Q3 [11]. 2. Impact of the Concentrated Opening of Amortized Fixed - Term Open - End Bond Funds - From 2025Q4 - 2026Q2, a round of opening days for amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds will be concentrated. Among the funds with a closed - end period of more than 1 year, 76 funds will open, with a total fund asset value of 7,433 billion yuan. In 2026Q1 and before, 53 funds with a closed - end period of more than 1 year will open [14][15]. - The concentrated opening of these funds may form a strong allocation demand for 3 - 5Y medium - and long - term credit bonds. After the opening days end and the funds enter the closed - end period to start building positions, they may have a relatively strong demand for such bonds [20]. - In terms of variety structure, the concentrated opening may directly benefit general credit bonds, and it is expected that general credit bonds may experience a good spread compression market. The medium - and long - term cost - performance of secondary perpetual bonds will be passively improved, attracting allocation funds [26][27]. - It is estimated that the opening of existing amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds will bring about 119.8 billion yuan of stable allocation funds to the credit bond market, and the funds entering the opening period before 2026Q2 are expected to bring about 51.8 billion yuan [29]. 3. Investment Suggestions - From 2025Q4 - 2026Q2, the concentrated opening of amortized fixed - term open - end bond funds may directly benefit credit bonds matching their closed - end periods, especially 3 - 5Y medium - and long - term credit bonds [30]. - The concentrated opening may directly benefit general credit bonds such as urban investment bonds and industrial bonds. High - grade (AAA - and above) medium - term notes are recommended as key trading targets in the future market [31][32].

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. Core Viewpoints - Entering the fourth quarter of 2025, a new batch of fixed - open bond funds priced using the amortized cost method are entering a concentrated opening period. These products can provide stable and predictable returns, alleviating investors' concerns about the uncertainty of the bond market and attracting market attention [1][11]. - From 2025Q4 to 2026Q2, the fixed - open bond funds with a 3 - 5 - year closed - end period will enter a new opening peak. Attention should be paid to the allocation opportunities of 3 - 5y varieties, including high - grade general credit bonds and policy - financial bonds [5][32]. Summary by Directory 1. Historical Amortized Cost Method Bond Funds - **Open - period Peaks**: Since their establishment in 2019, amortized cost fixed - open bond funds have experienced multiple open - period peaks. The third peak is expected from 2025Q4 to 2026Q2. They were first issued in May 2019, with issuance peaks in Q4 2019 and Q3 2020, and previous open - period peaks in 2022Q4 - 2023Q1 and 2023Q4 [2][11]. - **Bond Allocation Structure**: Policy - financial bonds dominate the bond allocation of existing products, but their proportion has declined in recent years. As of Q3 2025, the proportion of policy - financial bond holdings has dropped from around 90% to around 75% [2][12]. - **Historical Performance**: When amortized cost method bond funds enter the intensive open - period, the heavy - position varieties corresponding to the product's closed - end period perform well. For example, when 3y and 7y funds were concentratedly established or reopened, the spreads of corresponding - term policy - financial bonds were significantly compressed [16]. 2. What's Different This Round? (1) Investor Perspective - **Bank Self - operation**: In the affiliated - party context, the scale of bank self - operation holding amortized cost fixed - open bond funds has remained stable at around 250 billion yuan in recent years, mainly holding products with a term of 3y and above, indicating a stable long - term allocation demand [3][17]. - **Bank Wealth Management**: In 2025, due to the rectification of the valuation - smoothing method through the trust mechanism, bank wealth management has significantly increased its holdings of amortized cost method bond funds. The scale has increased from 1.71 billion yuan in Q4 2024 to 9.3 billion yuan in Q3 2025, a nearly 5.4 - fold increase. Bank wealth management prefers medium - term credit bonds and short - term (3y and within) amortized cost method bond funds [20][23]. (2) Asset Perspective - **Shift in Bond Allocation Preference**: Since 2025, the bond allocation preference of amortized cost method bond funds entering the open - period has shifted from policy - financial bonds to credit bonds. Among the 36 funds that reopened in the first three quarters of 2025, most have changed their bond allocation from policy - financial bonds to general credit bonds, with only 3 still mainly investing in policy - financial bonds [4][26]. - **Reasons for the Shift**: Firstly, the participation of bank wealth management in the investor structure has increased, and they prefer credit bonds. Secondly, in a low - interest - rate environment, institutions pursue higher - coupon - return assets [26]. - **Grade and Term Distribution**: In terms of the top five holdings of these 36 funds, they are mainly AAA - grade high - grade bonds, followed by non - rated bonds. The term is generally in line with the closed - end period of the funds, and subsequent structural opportunities of corresponding varieties can be grasped according to the term distribution of maturing funds [27]. 3. Opportunities for 3 - 5y Varieties under the New Round of Amortized Cost Method Bond Fund Openings - **Open - period Characteristics**: From 2025Q4 to 2026Q2, fixed - open bond funds with a 3 - 5 - year closed - end period will enter a new open - period. The main term shows a switching characteristic of "3 - 5 years → 5 years → 3 years", and the 5 - year variety will reach a maturity peak for the first time since the concentrated establishment of products in 2020 [5][32]. - **Credit Bonds**: With the increasing trend of wealth - management funds, attention can be paid to the spread - compression opportunities of 3 - 5 - year high - grade general credit bonds. However, the credit spreads of 3 - 5y high - grade medium - and short - term notes have been compressed to a relatively low level since 2024, so it is advisable to wait for the implementation of the fund - fee new regulations before seizing allocation opportunities [5][33]. - **Policy - financial Bonds**: Due to the previous selling pressure of funds, the spread quantiles of 3 - 5y policy - financial bonds are at a high level since 2022. After the implementation of the fund - fee new regulations, it is a good allocation time. However, the insufficient incremental funds of new products flowing into policy - financial bonds may lead to a less - effective spread - compression market than before [6][35][37].

固定收益 | 固定收益专题 摊余买信用，增多少？持续多久？ 证券研究报告 信用策略随笔 本篇聚焦，存续摊余债基分布如何？哪些摊余债基买信用多？陆续进 入开放期的摊余债基有哪些？对应将带来多大规模的信用配置新增力量？ 一、摊余债基再迎开放潮 截至 2025 年三季度末，存续摊余债基份额合计约 1.43 万亿份，对应 总资产合计约 2.06 万亿元，净资产合计约 1.48 万亿元。 封闭期在 1-3 年的摊余债基，在 2025 年以来增持普信债的趋势更为 明显，其对普信债的仓位较 2024 年末提高 22pct，或也是伴随着封闭期结 束的再配置调仓。 3-5 年及 5 年期以上的摊余债基更多或系进入开放期的体量相对还不 大，对普信债的增持还未得到体现。 进一步地，结合 2025 年三季报数据看，有 25 只摊余债基对普信债的 持仓较 2024 年末增加了 50+亿元，其中 19 只摊余债基的封闭期在 3 年左 右及 3 年内。 三、信用预计将迎来多少增量配置资金？ 从当前摊余债基预计开放时间分布来看： 结合摊余债基发行时间点及封闭期分布： 2019-2020 年发行的封闭期在 3 年左右的摊余债基在发行后的首个开 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond market is in a volatile and weak - trending situation, with the long - end and short - end yields showing different trends. The long - end yields move up and down following multiple logics, while the short - end yields are at a low level and are weakly volatile. The central bank's bond - buying operation may open up the game space for long - term interest rates, but the "rush - ahead" market in the bond market from November to December this year may not necessarily reappear [1][5][6]. - The positioning of the central bank's national debt trading tool is becoming more diversified and three - dimensional, which is an important part of improving the micro - foundation of the bond market and enhancing pricing efficiency. The impact of the scale of bond - buying on liquidity is not the main factor, and the ultimate shape of the yield curve depends on the desired range, which is affected by market expectations, fundamental conditions, and institutional behavior [2][3][12]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Market Review: Bond Market Continues to Seek Direction - This week, the bond market showed a volatile and weak - trending market under the rapid switching of multiple pricing logics. The long - end yields first declined and then rose following the logics of "central bank's bond - buying implementation - stock market strength suppressing - expectation fermentation of the new regulations on fund sales fees implementation", while the short - end yields were at a low level, and the central bank's bond - buying had limited boosting effect, showing a weak - trending volatility. On Friday, the short - end yields continued to correct due to slightly tight funds [1][8]. - At the beginning of the week, the market was mainly pricing around the central bank's restart of bond - buying in October. After the implementation of national debt trading on Tuesday afternoon, the long - end yields first rose and then strengthened. On Wednesday afternoon, the trading logic switched to the "stock - bond seesaw", and the bond market was suppressed by the strong stock market. On Friday, the expectation of the new regulations on fund sales fees implementation dominated the bond market, and the tightened funds also dragged down the market [8]. 3.2 This Week's Focus: How to Price the Yield Curve with the Central Bank's Resumption of Bond - Buying? - On October 27, the central bank mentioned resuming national debt trading, with new information including directly linking national debt trading to guiding the yield curve shape, affirming the current bond market operation, emphasizing two - way trading operations, and believing that national debt trading is beneficial to the reform and development of the bond market and the improvement of financial institutions' market - making and pricing capabilities [2][10]. - In October, the central bank net - bought 20 billion yuan of national debt. There is no need to over - focus on the relationship between the bond - buying scale in October and the operation time. The scale of bond - buying does not have a major impact on liquidity. National debt trading may open up the game space for long - term interest rates, and the market's pricing of the resumption of bond - buying may be nearing the end [3][12][14]. - The scale of bond - buying affects the market through expectations. A higher scale can boost market confidence, while a limited scale may be a short - term negative factor. The final shape of the yield curve depends on the desired range, which is affected by market expectations of interest rate trends, fundamental repair conditions, and institutional behavior [4][15][17]. 3.3 Next Week's Concern: Will There Be a "Rush - Ahead" Market at the End of the Year? - Near the end of the year, the market is turning its attention to the cross - year allocation market. The "rush - ahead" market at the end of last year was the main driving force for the rapid decline of bond market interest rates. However, this year, there are differences. The sustainability of the purchases by allocation - oriented investors such as rural commercial banks, large - scale banks, and insurance companies remains to be observed, and the increase in the purchase scale of wealth management products and funds is mainly driven by the expansion of the liability side, not by the rapid decline of bond market interest rates [5][19]. - It is believed that the "rush - ahead" market in the bond market from November to December this year may not necessarily reappear. The purchases by allocation - oriented investors may be restricted by floating losses and the high - base effect of last year's performance. Additionally, the imagination space for loose monetary policy has shrunk compared to the end of last year [5][22]. 3.4 Outlook for the Future - If the stock market strengthens and concerns about the new fund regulations ferment, it will still suppress the bond market. However, the wave - like recovery of the fundamentals and the central bank's resumption of bond - buying limit the upward adjustment momentum of interest rates. The cross - year allocation market remains to be confirmed, but the game space for long - term interest rates may be opened up. One can try to seize trading opportunities for long - term interest rates but should respond cautiously with a volatile mindset [6][23]. - In terms of spread trading, the current bond - swapping market has generally ended. The further compression space of the "China Development Bank Bond - National Debt" spread needs to be continuously observed based on the purchasing momentum of allocation - oriented investors. The "deposit transfer" may make the scale of wealth management products resilient, and the purchasing power of wealth management products may support medium - and short - term credit bonds. One can focus on medium - and short - duration bonds with coupon value [6][23][24].

Group 1 - The report highlights a divergence between credit rates and government bond yields, with credit spreads compressing due to stable funding and external factors such as tariff frictions and market dynamics [3][9]. - The net buying power for credit bonds, particularly "Puxin" bonds, remains strong, supporting the credit market's performance against interest rate movements [3][10]. - The report notes that the compression of credit spreads is more pronounced in "Puxin" bonds compared to perpetual bonds, with longer-term "Puxin" bonds and certain AA-rated city investment bonds leading the market [16][24]. Group 2 - The divergence in credit rates this year is attributed to the relatively poor liquidity of credit bonds and external supply-demand factors, such as the growth of credit bond ETFs, which have increased allocation demand [4][34]. - The report suggests that the current credit spread compression may have limited further upside, advising caution in trading strategies and recommending a focus on short credit positions [5][37]. - Specific investment opportunities include targeting bonds with yields above 2.0%, while maintaining a cautious stance on longer-duration perpetual bonds until new regulations are finalized [39][40].

Core Viewpoint - The recent decline in market risk appetite, influenced by ongoing US-China tariff issues, has led to a recovery in bond market sentiment, resulting in a general decrease in credit bond yields [1][2]. Market Sentiment and Trends - The credit bond market has seen a general downtrend in yields, with credit spreads narrowing. From October 13 to 17, yields on municipal bonds with a maturity of 10 years or less fell by 1 to 6 basis points, while credit spreads narrowed by 1 to 7 basis points [2]. - Institutions are currently favoring short to medium-term bonds with higher coupon rates and a safety margin, particularly 3-year municipal bonds and 2 to 4-year bank capital bonds. Demand for long-term bonds has not recovered in parallel [1][2][3]. Institutional Behavior - Fund demand for credit bonds with maturities of 3 years or more remains weak. In contrast to the period from mid-March to early April, where funds increased their holdings of medium to long-term credit bonds, the recent weeks have seen a shift back to shorter maturities [3][4]. - The demand for credit bonds is expected to decline further in the fourth quarter due to a decrease in the growth of wealth management products, which typically see a larger increase in the first half of the year [4][5]. Future Outlook - The credit bond market is anticipated to continue a pattern of oscillation and consolidation in the fourth quarter, with institutions likely to reduce their credit bond positions due to a weak supply-demand structure [4][5]. - Analysts suggest that, given the current supply-demand imbalance, credit bonds are unlikely to yield excess returns compared to interest rate bonds, and liquidity issues may exacerbate risks during interest rate hikes [5][6]. Investment Strategies - Institutions are advised to maintain a cautious approach, focusing on short-duration bonds with higher coupon rates to identify structural opportunities. Specific recommendations include targeting municipal bonds with maturities of 1 to 3 years and yields above 2.2% [7][8].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The adjustment of Tier 2 and Perpetual (Two - Yong) bonds may not be over, and they still face risks of callback and repricing. However, they still have certain cost - effectiveness, especially 5 - year high - rating varieties [5][6]. - In the fourth quarter, the bond market is likely to fluctuate and decline, and there are still concerns about the decline in spreads. It is difficult to reproduce the unilateral downward trend in April [5]. - After the official release of the new public offering sales regulations, the spread center of Two - Yong bonds and their yield may rise slightly [5]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Two - Yong Bonds' Cost - Effectiveness is Prominent - In September, affected by market risk appetite and rising interest rates, the bond market continued to adjust. After the China Securities Regulatory Commission solicited opinions on the new public offering sales regulations on September 5, the bond market faced redemption pressure. Two - Yong bonds, as heavily - held by public funds, had significant declines, and the yields of 5Y and above Two - Yong bonds reached new highs for the year [5][12]. - In October, the stock market pulled back, the 10Y Treasury bond interest rate declined slightly, and the yields of urban investment bonds and Two - Yong bonds decreased. The Two - Yong bonds with larger previous declines had more obvious recoveries. As of now, the yields and credit spreads of 5Y credit assets are still at relatively high historical percentile levels for the year, and the decline may be limited [5][14]. 3.2 What to Focus on in Two - Yong Bonds - From a macro - fundamental perspective, Sino - US games and a weak economy support the bond market. However, the stock market rebound in October and concerns about the new public offering sales regulations still pose concerns about the decline in yields of quasi - interest - rate varieties [20]. - In terms of supply structure, the redemption of Two - Yong bonds reached a new high in September, the net financing gap widened, and banks faced capital replenishment pressure. In the fourth quarter, the supply of Two - Yong bonds may not be weak due to "redeeming old and issuing new" [5][23]. - From the perspective of institutional behavior, the spread trend of Two - Yong bonds is more related to the net purchases of funds, wealth management products, and securities firms. Currently, the liquidity of Two - Yong bonds is okay, but the buying power of funds is not strong. The impact of the official release of the new public offering sales regulations remains to be observed [27]. - Historically, the bond market in the fourth quarter is likely to show a pattern of fluctuating recovery, and it mostly moves sideways in October. Currently, the trading volume and turnover rate of Two - Yong bonds have rebounded, and the decline space is limited. Attention can be paid to the effect of the interest - rate amplifier of Two - Yong bonds on increasing returns when interest rates decline [47]. 3.3 Which Two - Yong Bonds Still Have Cost - Effectiveness - From the perspective of asset comparison, except for 3Y - AA+ Tier 2 capital bonds, the historical percentiles of the yields of other Two - Yong bonds are higher than those of other varieties with the same maturity, still having certain cost - effectiveness. The yields of 3Y implied AAA - and AA+ perpetual bonds are higher than those of medium - short - term notes and Tier 2 capital bonds of the same maturity, at 76% and 18% historical percentile levels for the year respectively. The yields of 5 - year Tier 2 capital bonds and perpetual bonds are higher than those of other credit assets, and the yields are all at more than 16% historical percentile levels for the year [53]. - From the perspective of credit spreads, high - implied - rating Two - Yong bonds have relatively higher cost - effectiveness, especially 5Y Tier 2 capital bonds. The 3Y implied AAA - perpetual bonds have relatively large spread compression space compared with Tier 2 capital bonds of the same rating and maturity, at the 50% historical percentile level for the year. The spreads of 5 - year high - implied - rating Two - Yong bonds compared with general credit bonds are more sufficient, and the 5Y implied AAA - perpetual bonds are worthy of attention, with a credit spread of 66bp, at the 59% historical percentile level for the year [58].

Group 1: Report's Overall Information - Report Title: 3Y within General Credit Bonds and 3 - 5Y Tier 2 and Perpetual Bonds Spread Continues to Compress - Credit Spread Weekly Tracking 20251018 [1] - Report Date: October 18, 2025 [2] - Report Type: Special Report [2] Group 2: Report's Core Views - Interest rates are oscillating, and credit bonds continue to recover. The spreads of 1Y medium - low grade and 3Y medium - high grade bonds have significantly compressed. Credit spreads have generally converged, with short - duration spreads having a larger convergence amplitude. [2][5] - Urban investment bond spreads have generally declined by 4 - 5BP, with spreads of different external ratings and administrative levels all showing a downward trend. [2][9] - Most industrial bond spreads have declined, but the spreads of mixed - ownership real estate bonds have still increased. The spreads of central and state - owned enterprise real estate bonds have declined, while those of mixed - ownership and private real estate bonds have increased. The spreads of coal, steel, and chemical bonds have mostly declined. [2][20] - The yields of Tier 2 and perpetual bonds have all declined this week, and the spreads of 3 - 5Y bonds have continued to recover, with high - grade varieties performing better. [2][31] - The excess spread of 3Y industrial perpetual bonds has increased, while the excess spread of 5Y urban investment bonds has decreased. [2][34] Group 3: Summary by Directory I. Interest rates oscillate, and credit bonds continue to recover, with the spreads of 1Y medium - low grade and 3Y medium - high grade bonds significantly compressing - Interest rate bonds have maintained an oscillating pattern. The yields of 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, and 7Y China Development Bank bonds have increased by 1BP, 2BP, 1BP, and 2BP respectively compared to last week, while the yield of 10Y bonds has decreased by 1BP. [2][5] - Most credit bond yields have declined, and credit spreads have significantly converged. Short - duration credit spreads have a larger convergence amplitude. [2][5] - In terms of rating spreads, the spreads of different grades and terms have shown different changes. In terms of term spreads, the spreads of different grades and terms have also shown different trends. [5] II. Urban investment bond spreads have generally declined by 4 - 5BP - The credit spreads of external rating AAA platforms have generally declined by 4BP compared to last week, while those of AA+ and AA have both declined by 5BP. Spreads of platforms in different regions have different degrees of decline. [2][9] - In terms of administrative levels, the credit spreads of provincial platforms have generally declined by 4BP, while those of municipal and district - county platforms have both declined by 5BP. Spreads of platforms in different regions have different degrees of decline. [2][17] III. Most industrial bond spreads have declined, but the spreads of mixed - ownership real estate bonds have still increased - The spreads of central and state - owned enterprise real estate bonds have declined by 4BP, while those of mixed - ownership real estate bonds have increased by 46BP, and those of private real estate bonds have increased by 1BP. The spreads of some real estate companies have different degrees of change. [2][20] - The spreads of all grades of coal bonds have declined by 4BP; the spreads of AAA steel bonds have declined by 4BP, and those of AA+ have declined by 5BP; the spreads of AAA chemical bonds have declined by 4BP, and those of AA+ have declined by 5BP. The spreads of some companies have different degrees of decline. [2][20] IV. The spreads of 3 - 5Y Tier 2 and perpetual bonds continue to recover - The yields of 1Y Tier 2 capital bonds of all grades have declined by 1BP, and perpetual bonds have remained roughly flat, with credit spreads declining by 2 - 3BP. [2][31] - The yields of 3Y Tier 2 capital bonds of all grades have declined by 3 - 4BP, and the yields of perpetual bonds have declined by 2 - 3BP, with spreads compressing by 5 - 7BP. [2][31] - The yields of 5Y Tier 2 capital bonds of all grades have declined by 2 - 3BP, and the yields of all grades of perpetual bonds have declined by 3 - 5BP, with spreads declining by 3 - 6BP. [2][31] V. The excess spread of 3Y industrial perpetual bonds has increased, while the excess spread of 5Y urban investment bonds has decreased - The excess spread of industrial AAA 3Y perpetual bonds has increased by 0.99BP compared to last week to 15.51BP, at the 41.31% quantile since 2015. The excess spread of industrial 5Y perpetual bonds has remained flat compared to last week at 12.39BP, at the 25.90% quantile since 2015. [2][34] - The excess spread of urban investment AAA 3Y perpetual bonds has increased by 0.15BP to 4.97BP, at the 3.01% quantile. The excess spread of urban investment AAA 5Y perpetual bonds has declined by 3.39BP to 11.08BP, at the 16.73% quantile. [2][34] VI. Credit spread database compilation instructions - The overall market credit spreads, commercial bank Tier 2 and perpetual bond spreads, and urban investment/industrial perpetual bond credit spreads are calculated based on ChinaBond medium - short - term notes and ChinaBond perpetual bond data, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015. The credit spreads related to urban investment and industrial bonds are compiled and statistically analyzed by Cinda Securities R & D Center, with historical quantiles since the beginning of 2015. [39] - The calculation methods for various spreads and the sample selection criteria for industrial and urban investment bonds are provided. [41]