证 券 研 究 报 告 钢铁行业周报（20250623-20250627） 淡季供需尚稳，钢价底部仍有支撑 行业观点：钢材总库存累库，钢价弱势震荡 事件：截至 6 月 27 日，五大品种螺纹钢、线材、热轧、冷轧、中板价格分别 报收 3181 元/吨、3514 元/吨、3205 元/吨、3607 元/吨、3371 元/吨，周环比分 别变化-0.63%、-0.71%、-0.17%、-0.19%、-0.78%。本周五大品种产量 880.99 万吨，周环比上升 12.48万吨。247家钢铁企业日均铁水 242.29万吨，周环比 上升 0.11万吨，高炉产能利用率 90.83%，周环比上升 0.04个百分点，高炉开 工率 83.82%，周环比持平。短流程企业，电炉产能利用率 54.50%，周环比下 降 0.04 个百分点，电炉开工率 70.14%，周环比下降 0.79 个百分点。库存方 面，本周钢材总库存 1340.03万吨，周环比上升1.14万吨。其中社会库存环比 下降 6.6万吨至 906.51万吨；钢厂库存环比上升 7.74万吨至 433.52万吨。需 求端，本周五大材合计消费量 879.85万吨，周环比下降 4 ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 通信行业周报（20250623-20250629） Marvell 投资者日指引积极，小米 AI 智能眼镜发 推荐（维持） 布，建议关注 AI 及端侧产业链进展 行业研究 通信 2025 年 06 月 29 日 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：欧子兴 邮箱：ouzixing@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360523080007 行业基本数据 | | | 占比% | | --- | --- | --- | | 股票家数(只) | 124 | 0.02 | | 总市值(亿元) | 48,433.38 | 4.82 | | 流通市值(亿元) | 21,923.73 | 2.78 | 相对指数表现 | % | 1M | 6M | 12M | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 绝对表现 | 12.9% | 3.1% | 34.1% | | 相对表现 | 10.8% | 4.6% | 20.6% | -11% 5% 20% 36% 24/06 24/09 24/11 25/01 25/04 25/06 2024-06-28~2025-06-27 通信 沪深300 相关研究报 ...

行业研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 华创交运|低空经济周报（第 43 期） 中国电科低空经济大会：发布三大产品体系， 推荐（维持） 持续推荐电科低空三杰 交通运输 2025 年 06 月 29 日 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：吴一凡 电话：021-20572539 邮箱：wuyifan@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360516090002 证券分析师：梁婉怡 邮箱：liangwanyi@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360523080001 证券分析师：吴晨玥 邮箱：wuchenyue@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360523070001 证券分析师：霍鹏浩 邮箱：huopenghao@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360524030001 证券分析师：卢浩敏 邮箱：luhaomin@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360524090001 联系人：李清影 邮箱：liqingying@hcyjs.com 行业基本数据 | | | | 占比% | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 股票家数(只) | | 122 | 0.02 | | 总市值(亿元) | | 33,406 ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 政策计算机行业周报（20250623-20250627） 推荐（维持） 小米 YU7 首销爆单，产业加速迭代升级 行业研究 计算机 2025 年 06 月 29 日 相对指数表现 | % | 1M | 6M | 12M | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 绝对表现 | 8.2% | 4.0% | 51.4% | | 相对表现 | 6.1% | 5.5% | 37.8% | $$\frac{1}{4}\mathbb{E}\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{1}{2}\mathbb{E}\frac{1}{4}\right)$$ 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：吴鸣远 邮箱：wumingyuan@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360523040001 联系人：周志浩 邮箱：zhouzhihao1@hcyjs.com 行业基本数据 | | | 占比% | | --- | --- | --- | | 股票家数(只) | 338 | 0.04 | | 总市值(亿元) | 45,343.43 | 4.40 | | 流通市值(亿元) | 39,023.53 | 4.8 ...

宏观研究 证 券 研 究 报 告 【宏观快评】 看股做债，不是看债做股 核心观点 1、宏观资配研判的时候，辨析股债关系是极其重要的: 当居民存款搬家为流动性主要矛盾的时候，股债交易大的逻辑是看股做债带来 的股债跷跷板——股票表达风险偏好➡风险偏好带动居民存款搬家➡居民存 款搬家带动非银存款提升➡非银存款存在脉冲性➡央行对冲空转的警惕➡银 行间资金易紧➡债券下跌； 当央行货币宽松为流动性主要矛盾的时候，股债交易大的逻辑是看债做股带来 的股债双牛——央行大幅宽松➡银行间充裕带来非银存款提升➡无风险利率 下行+非银存款提升➡股票估值与增量资金双击。 2、虽然本轮非银流动性的增长规模接近 2014年~2015年，但与2014~2015年 货币宽松主导流动性改善显著不同，本轮流动性改善的主逻辑是居民存款搬 家。因此大的宏观交易逻辑上，我们认为本轮更倾向于看股做债的股债跷跷板 逻辑，而非看债做股的股债双牛逻辑。 3、值得注意的是，与过往流动性宽松相比，本轮居民存款搬家也存在特殊性： 第一特殊，居民存款配置难回地产，客观面临资产荒，涌动力量更强。 第二特殊，自上而下"稳股市"政策助力资本市场，一定程度上限制了股票市 场风险 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a recommendation for the banking sector, indicating a positive outlook for long-term investment opportunities [4][8]. Core Insights - The banking sector has shown strong long-term performance, with returns exceeding those of the broader market indices over various holding periods. Historical returns since 2010, 2015, and 2020 for the banking index were 170%, 92.9%, and 39.6% respectively, outperforming the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index [3][4]. - The banking sector's return on equity (ROE) remains above 9%, supported by stable asset quality and a decline in credit costs, despite a narrowing net interest margin since 2020 [4][8]. - The sector's valuation is currently at a historically low level, with a price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 6.85 and a price-to-book (PB) ratio of 0.62, while the dividend yield stands at 5.21%, indicating attractive investment opportunities [25][24]. Monthly Performance Overview - In June 2025, the banking sector experienced a cumulative increase of 5.37%, outperforming the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index by 3.25 percentage points, ranking 9th among 31 sectors [12][5]. - The trading volume for the banking sector surged by 74.8% in June, reaching 606.9 billion yuan, reflecting increased market confidence following regulatory reforms [24][29]. - Key performers in the banking sector included Zhejiang Commercial Bank (10.71%), Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank (10.66%), and Pudong Development Bank (9.89%), driven by their low valuations and high dividend yields [17][16]. Market Environment - The interest rate environment remains low, with the 10-year government bond yield declining from 1.68% to 1.65% in June, contributing to a favorable backdrop for banking stocks [21][24]. - The report highlights a structural shift in credit demand, with direct financing increasing while traditional bank credit shows signs of decline, particularly in the residential loan segment [30][28]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests a diversified investment strategy focusing on state-owned banks and stable joint-stock banks, emphasizing the importance of dividend strategies and asset quality [8][4]. - It recommends monitoring banks with high dividend yields and strong asset quality, such as China Merchants Bank, CITIC Bank, and regional banks with robust provisioning coverage [8][4].

Group 1 - The banking sector has shown strong performance due to continuous inflow of incremental funds, with the banking index rising by 41.2% since Q2 2023, significantly outperforming the overall market which only increased by 3.9% [13][9][11] - The "national team" liquidity support has been a key factor, with an estimated net inflow of 1,043.5 billion yuan into banking stocks from ETFs since 2024, representing 3.2% of the current free float market value of banks [13][9][11] - Long-term capital from insurance funds continues to flow into the banking sector, which is characterized by large market capitalization, stable earnings, and high dividend yields, making it attractive to investors [13][9][11] Group 2 - The financial industry's value added as a percentage of GDP has been steadily increasing, reaching 7.29% in Q1 2025 [11][29] - The net profit growth of banks has been more stable, with a year-on-year increase of 0.5% in 2024 compared to a decline of 14.5% for non-financial A-shares, and banks accounted for 40.6% of total A-share net profits [11][29] - The core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of commercial banks reached a historical high of 11.0% in Q4 2024, indicating robust solvency [11][29] Group 3 - The banking sector's profitability remains resilient, with the net interest margin showing relative stability during the interest rate decline cycle, decreasing from 1.74% to 1.43% [11][30] - The dividend yield for banks remains high at 5.4% as of June 20, 2025, while other dividend-paying sectors have seen declines in their yields [11][30] - The overall credit cost for banks is expected to remain stable, with the net generation rate of non-performing loans anticipated to fluctuate at low levels [12][30] Group 4 - The outlook for banking operations indicates reduced pressure on core revenue growth, with credit costs expected to stabilize [12][30] - The banking sector's return on equity (ROE) is projected to remain above 9%, with a theoretical bottom line ROE of 8.5% [12][30] - The banking sector is expected to continue to outperform private enterprises as creditors in a low-price environment, benefiting from the relative strength of their balance sheets [10][29]

Investment Rating - The report assigns a "Recommended" rating to the company with a target price of 30 yuan, based on a projected market value of 310 billion yuan [2][7]. Core Viewpoints - The company is positioned as a leader in the ready-to-drink (RTD) beverage sector and is accelerating its entry into the whiskey market, aiming to establish itself as a benchmark in the industry and create a second growth curve [5][12]. - The whiskey segment is identified as a potential growth area, with a market size estimated to exceed 150 billion yuan, given the current low penetration of whiskey in China's liquor consumption [5][8]. - The company has a strong production capacity and a commitment to consumer education, which are seen as key advantages in capturing market share in the whiskey category [5][8]. Summary by Sections Company Overview - The company, founded in 1997, initially focused on flavor production and has since become a leader in the RTD market with a revenue share of approximately 90% from RTD beverages [12][13]. - It has strategically entered the whiskey market, launching brands "Lai Zhou" and "Bailide" in 2024, with plans for further expansion [12]. RTD Beverages - The RTD beverage market is characterized by a "pulse penetration" pattern, with significant growth potential despite current competitive pressures [25][33]. - The company holds a market share of about 72.5% in the RTD sector, benefiting from strong brand recognition and effective marketing strategies [39][41]. - The RTD segment is expected to stabilize and grow, supported by new product launches and improved marketing operations [5][6]. Whiskey Market - The whiskey market in China is currently underdeveloped, with only 0.5% of the liquor consumption, indicating substantial growth potential [5][8]. - The company has established a unique large-scale blending whiskey production capacity, with an annual output of 26,000 tons of grain whiskey, and a significant inventory of barrels [5][8]. - The report emphasizes the importance of flavor innovation and consumer education in driving the growth of domestic whiskey brands [5][8]. Financial Projections - The company is projected to achieve revenues of 3,048 million yuan in 2024, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14% expected through 2026 [6]. - Net profit forecasts for the company are 719 million yuan in 2024, increasing to 1,122 million yuan by 2027, reflecting a strong growth trajectory [6][7].

证 券 研 究 报 告 保险行业周报（20250623-20250627） 风偏上行催化板块行情，看好负债端经营质 推荐（维持） 量改善趋势 本周行情复盘：保险指数上涨 3.89%，跑赢大盘 1.93pct。保险个股表现分化， 阳光+9.57%，太平+8.63%，友邦+5.53%，太保+4.47%，平安+4.06%，财险 +3.61%，新华+3.46%，人保+2.82%，国寿+2.39%。10年期国债收益率1.65%， 较上周末+1bp。 本周动态： （1）中证网：6月 24日，港交所披露易最新数据显示，蚂蚁集团当日减持约 3375.48万股众安保险股。此次减持后，蚂蚁集团对众安保险的持股数量占已 发行的有投票权股份百分比降至 7.63%。 （2）众安在线：增资约 39亿港元，配售价 18.25港元/股，配售股份相当于现 有已发行 H股的 15.14%。本次增资主要用于补充资金需求、支撑金融科技创 新投资以及一般企业用途。 （3）金融监管总局：2025 年 1-5 月原保费收入 3.06 万亿，其中财产险 6129 亿元，人身险 24473 亿元。 保险近期行情点评： 近期保险板块行情表现突出，我们认为主要催 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given content. 2. Report's Core View - In May, the year - on - year profit of industrial enterprises above designated size dropped to -9.1%, a significant decline from April. The year - on - year decline of PPI in May was 3.3%, and the drag on profits increased compared to April. After excluding price factors, the growth rate of single - month operating income declined marginally, indicating that the support from quantity factors also weakened in May. The resonance of internal and external demand fluctuations and the widening decline of PPI under the influence of tariffs led to a further decline in the profit growth rate in May [2][25]. - Looking ahead, the "rush - to - export" effect has weakened since June. The internal driving force of the economy in the second quarter shows obvious off - season characteristics, and the economy in the second half of the year faces high - base disturbances, so the necessity of domestic demand policy stimulus increases. The lower price base and the gradual expenditure of fiscal funds may help repair the price side of corporate profits. The importance of domestic demand stimulus becomes prominent as the export elasticity may weaken and the external tariff policy environment faces uncertainties in August [2][28]. - In the third quarter, the existing domestic demand policies such as consumption and investment may be further strengthened, and the quantity factors may improve marginally. At the same time, the PPI base will be lower in the second half of the year. Coupled with the stimulus of domestic demand and the formation of project expenditures and physical work volume by previous fiscal funds, the drag of prices on corporate profits is also expected to narrow [28]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Industry Perspective: Downstream Consumption Policy Support Catalyzes, while Upstream and Mid - stream Face Disturbances - **Upstream**: Mining industry profits are still under pressure, with most industries seeing an expansion of profit decline, but the energy supply industry continues to grow positively. For example, the profit decline of coal mining and washing, oil and gas extraction, and ferrous metal ore mining industries widened; the profit of non - ferrous metal ore mining industry increased, and the profit of the power, heat, gas, and water production and supply industry increased slightly [8][16]. - **Mid - stream**: Equipment manufacturing is better than material processing, and it continues to grow slightly. The pressure on the material processing industry persists, with the year - on - year decline expanding. The profit growth rate of mid - stream equipment manufacturing decreased, with the cumulative year - on - year growth rate at +0.1% [17]. - **Downstream**: There is a structural differentiation between essential and optional consumption, and the electronics equipment industry still performs strongly. The profit of essential consumption turned negative year - on - year, while the profit of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery and the beverage industry maintained growth. Most of the optional consumption industries had weak year - on - year profits, but the electronics equipment industry still performed well [18]. 3.2 Cost Side: Slight Increase in Expenses, Marginal Slight Improvement in Profit Margin - From January to May, the cost per 100 yuan of operating income of industrial enterprises above designated size was 85.61 yuan, an increase of 0.24 yuan year - on - year and 0.07 yuan compared to January - April. The expense per 100 yuan of operating income was 8.29 yuan, a decrease of 0.14 yuan year - on - year but an increase of 0.01 yuan compared to January - April, indicating a slowdown in the pace of cost reduction. The cumulative operating income profit margin from January to May was 4.97%, a decrease of 0.22 percentage points year - on - year but an increase of 0.10 percentage points compared to January - April. Although the profit efficiency is still a drag compared to the same period last year, it has improved marginally [1][20]. 3.3 Inventory: Actual Inventory May Increase Passively - As of the end of May, the finished - product inventory of industrial enterprises above designated size was 6.65 trillion yuan, with a year - on - year growth rate of 4.1%, a decrease of 0.4 percentage points compared to the end of April, and the nominal inventory growth rate declined slightly. After considering price factors, the actual inventory growth rate after excluding PPI was 6.8%, an increase from 6.6% in April. Since the sales - to - production ratio slowed down in May, indicating weak actual demand recovery, the actual inventory may have increased passively. The turnover days of finished - product inventory from January to May were 20.8 days, an increase of 0.1 days year - on - year but a decrease of 0.2 days compared to January - April, indicating a slightly faster turnover rhythm. The average collection period of accounts receivable was 70.5 days, an increase of 3.7 days year - on - year but a decrease of 0.2 days compared to January - April, indicating that the policy of promoting the settlement of arrears has compressed the collection period [23].