Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the document. Core View of the Report The report delves into the evolution of the Phillips Curve and its current state of alienation in the US, aiming to explain the Fed's policy dilemmas. It analyzes the factors contributing to the flattening and steepening of the curve and offers insights into the Fed's current policy stance, including reasons for delaying interest rate cuts [2][8][14]. Summary by Related Catalog Evolution of the Phillips Curve Theory - In 1926, Irving Fisher pointed out the inverse relationship between unemployment and price changes, emphasizing the impact of unexpected price changes on the economy [3]. - In 1958, Phillips proposed the negative correlation between the unemployment rate and the rate of change in money - wages, and drew the Phillips Curve [3]. - In 1960, Samuelson and Solow proposed the "unemployment - price" Phillips Curve, replacing the rate of change in money - wages with price increases and incorporating the theory of wage - cost - driven inflation [4]. - In 1962, Okun proposed the "output - price" Phillips Curve, replacing the unemployment rate with the economic growth rate. The combination of Okun's Law and the Phillips Curve forms the basis of the Keynesian policy framework [5]. - In the 1970s, Friedman and Phelps proposed the Phillips Curve with adaptive expectations, introducing the concepts of short - term and long - term curves and the natural unemployment rate [6]. - In the mid - 1970s, the rational expectations school argued that there is no stable relationship between unemployment and inflation in both the short and long term, and the Phillips Curve is vertical [7]. - After the 1980s, the New Keynesian Phillips Curve (NKPC) became systematic, emphasizing forward - looking expectation management [7]. Alienation of the Phillips Curve - **Flattening**: In recent years, the Phillips Curve has flattened. From 1960 - 1983, the slope was 0.67, but from 2000 - 2019, it dropped to 0.03, making it difficult for policymakers to adjust inflation and employment. Factors include stable inflation expectations, supply - chain reconstruction due to trade globalization, and labor - market structural issues [8][9][10]. - **Steepening**: Since 2020, due to large - scale fiscal stimulus and supply - side disruptions after the pandemic, the Phillips Curve has shown a short - term steepening, leaving behind government debt pressure and weakening the curve's elasticity [11]. - **Underlying Cause**: The essence of the Phillips Curve's changes is that the US economy is no longer a closed loop, and the economic cycle's scope changes, leading to local breaks in the curve [12]. Understanding the Fed's Policy Attitude - **Two Concerns**: The Fed is worried about uncontrollable inflation expectations and whether tariff shocks and loose policies will lead to persistent inflation [14]. - **Reasons for Delaying Interest Rate Cuts**: The Fed's ability to suppress inflation is declining; the effectiveness of interest rate cuts depends on the smooth operation of the global dollar system; managing inflation expectations is crucial; and the Fed uses the CME FedWatch tool for expectation management [15].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints - The recent bond market correction was beyond investors' expectations, with the 10-year Treasury bond yield rising from 1.66% to 1.74%. After analyzing the influencing factors, investors don't need to worry too much. Key points to focus on include the central bank's continued intention to support funds, whether the redemption pressure peak on July 24 has passed, and whether commodity prices drive subsequent PPI to rise significantly and form inflationary pressure. In the short term, the supply pressure of government bonds in the second half of the year has decreased compared to the first half, the fundamentals are not bearish for the bond market, the possibility of unexpectedly incremental policies in the July Politburo meeting is low, the curve steepening from an institutional behavior perspective will continue, and investors' bullish sentiment remains [2][6]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs Analysis of Bond Market Correction Factors - **Redemption Tide**: On July 24, the redemption intensity of pure bond funds was significantly stronger than that in February this year, second only to the redemption tide in October last year, and roughly equivalent to that in August last year. From July 23 - 24, funds sold a large amount of bonds, and the selling volume corresponded to the redemption index without excessive selling. If subsequent redemption indicators stabilize, the bond market correction will be relatively controllable [4]. - **Fund Tightening and Treasury Bond Issuance**: Although there was a net withdrawal in the central bank's open - market operations from Monday to Wednesday this week, the funding rate DR007 remained below 1.50%, and the amount of funds provided by the banking system was maintained at 4 trillion yuan. On July 24, the funding tightened, but on July 25, the central bank conducted 7893 billion yuan of 7D reverse repurchases (net investment of 6018 billion yuan), indicating its clear intention to support liquidity. Investors don't need to worry too much about fund tightening and primary issuance [4]. - **Impact of Commodity Market Rally on Bond Market**: The rally in the commodity market has suppressed bond market sentiment. Although historically, PPI and the 10 - year Treasury bond yield have a high correlation, there have been some divergences. For the current market, real estate investment remains under pressure, the funding rate is maintained about 10bp above the OMO, and whether PPI can turn positive and continue to rise is uncertain. The current commodity price increase lacks strong demand - side support and is difficult to effectively transmit to CPI and form comprehensive inflationary pressure [4][5].

Investment Rating - The report suggests a positive outlook for the controllable nuclear fusion industry, particularly focusing on the FRC (Field-reversed Configuration) technology path, which is expected to lead to commercial viability sooner than other methods [5][10]. Core Insights - FRC technology is highlighted as a "dark horse" in the nuclear fusion sector due to its simpler structure and lower costs, making it more likely to achieve commercialization first [10][13]. - The report emphasizes the importance of semiconductor switches in the power systems of FRC devices, which are crucial for stable operation and energy recovery [5][31]. - Investment opportunities are identified in companies that are leading in technology and have established core customer relationships, particularly in the context of the rising domestic fusion industry [7][14]. Summary by Sections Short-term Opportunities - Domestic startups like Nova Fusion, Xingneng Xuanguang, and Hanhai Fusion are rapidly emerging, increasing investment demand for core components such as vacuum switches and capacitors [7]. - Key companies benefiting from this trend include Xuguang Electronics, Guoguang Electric, Wangzi New Materials, and Shengye Electric [7]. Long-term Prospects - Helion is projected to be the first company to achieve commercial fusion power sales, with plans to provide 50MW of fusion power to Microsoft by 2028 [7]. - Helion's technology combines FRC with a magnetic energy recovery system, enhancing efficiency and reducing costs [7]. - The report notes that semiconductor switches are expected to have a longer lifespan and higher reliability, making them essential for large drivers in the future [7][35]. Industry Trends - The report discusses the increasing number of startups focusing on FRC technology, indicating a growing market interest and investment [14]. - The semiconductor switch technology is identified as a key trend for large driver applications, with advantages over traditional gas switches [35][37]. Relevant Companies - Sijingt Technology (0580.HK) has secured orders for pulse power switches from TAE, a leading US fusion company, indicating its strong position in the market [39][42]. - Hongwei Technology is recognized as a leading domestic semiconductor power device company, with expectations of turning profitable by 2025 [53]. - Xuguang Electronics is noted for its strategic partnership with Hanhai Fusion, enhancing its position in the nuclear fusion sector [57].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly state an investment rating for the synthetic biology industry Core Insights - The synthetic biology sector is experiencing a global biotechnology revolution, providing innovative solutions to major challenges such as health, climate change, resource security, and food security. The National Development and Reform Commission has issued the "14th Five-Year Plan for the Development of the Bioeconomy," indicating a trillion-yuan market potential in the bioeconomy [4][5] Market Performance - The Huazhong Synthetic Biology Index rose by 14.49% to 1709.48 during the week of July 14-18, 2025, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index by 13.8 percentage points and the ChiNext Index by 11.32 percentage points [5][18] - The overall performance of synthetic biology stocks was strong, with the top six performing companies being all from the pharmaceutical sector, including Kanghong Pharmaceutical (+22%) and Zhejiang Zhenyuan (+19%) [20][23] Company Developments - China National Pharmaceutical invested approximately 6.8 billion yuan to acquire 95.09% of Lixin Pharmaceutical, enhancing its R&D capabilities in oncology [26] - New Fengming invested 100 million yuan in Hefei Lifeng Biotechnology to promote the industrialization of bio-based polyester PEF [26] - Sichuan Huanlong Ecological Technology received approval for a 1.5 billion yuan bamboo fiber project, expected to produce 250,000 tons of bleached bamboo pulp annually [27] - Cargill and HELM AG launched the world's largest bio-based BDO project in Iowa, with an investment of 300 million USD, showcasing the potential of bio-based materials in the chemical industry [29] Industry Financing - The synthetic biology sector has seen accelerated financing, with nearly 100 companies completing new funding rounds in 2025. Notable examples include Tuoxin Tiancheng, which raised nearly 40 million USD for T-cell immunotherapy product development [35] - Illimis Therapeutics completed a 58 billion KRW (approximately 42 million USD) B round financing to advance its Alzheimer's disease candidate [35] Research and Development - Fuhong Hanlin announced the completion of the first patient dosing of its innovative HER2 antibody HLX22 in the US, marking a significant milestone in cancer treatment [39] - He Yuan Biotechnology's plant-derived recombinant human serum albumin received approval, representing a breakthrough in the field of plant-based recombinant protein drugs [39]

Group 1: Report Information - Report Title: "Fixed Income Weekly: How Has the Bond Market Broken Through Sideways Trading Historically? - Interest Rate Weekly (Week 3 of July)" [1] - Report Date: July 22, 2025 [2] - Analysts: Yan Ziqi, Hong Ziyan [2] Group 2: Industry Investment Rating - No information provided Group 3: Core Viewpoints - The current bond market has been in a long - lasting sideways trading with low interest rates and extremely low volatility. From April to July this year, the 10 - year Treasury bond yield oscillated between 1.60% - 1.70%, with a range of only 10bp, and the volatility on July 8 reached the lowest in the past 5 years [2]. - Historically, out of 12 rounds of bond market sideways trading from 2019 to now, 7 times the subsequent interest rates broke through downward and 5 times upward, with the sideways trading usually lasting about 1 month. A transition to a bull market typically requires a combination of increased economic downward pressure, monetary policy easing, and asset shortage, while a transition to a bear market needs factors like better - than - expected economic recovery, tightened monetary policy, rising inflation expectations, and regulatory impacts [3]. - The current trading theme in the bond market is unclear. On one hand, the strong GDP performance in the first half of the year makes investors expect no significant incremental policies in the short term, and recent consumption policies have made the bond market underperform. On the other hand, the current capital situation is in a balanced state, and the government bond supply pressure from July to August is not large and can be hedged by the central bank [4][7]. - A method to judge the end of a sideways market turning bearish is to observe the significant cooling of investors' aggressiveness in non - interest - rate bond strategies. When investors' expectation of further interest rate decline weakens, their buying of non - interest - rate bonds decreases, especially in the case of Tier 2 and perpetual bonds [7]. - Historically, the bond market breaking through sideways trading usually requires unexpected macro and policy factors. Currently, considering the long - term sideways trading, low interest rates, and small fluctuations in the bond market, and the enhanced learning effect in the market this year, investors can focus on the aggressiveness of non - interest - rate bond strategies to measure the bond market's risk - preference expectations [10]. Group 4: Summary by Related Catalog Historical Bond Market Sideways Trading and Breakthrough - The report sorted out 12 rounds of bond market sideways trading from 2019 to now, analyzing the sideways trading periods, 10 - year Treasury bond fluctuation ranges, reasons for sideways trading, post - breakthrough performances, and triggering factors [3][4]. Current Bond Market Situation - The trading theme is unclear, with factors from economic performance, policies, capital situation, and supply side affecting the market [4][7]. Micro - perspective Analysis - By observing the trading behavior of non - interest - rate bonds, especially the buying intensity of Tier 2 and perpetual bonds by brokers and funds, a method to judge the end of a sideways market turning bearish is provided [7].

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Overweight" [1] Core Views - The chemical sector's overall performance ranked 11th this week, with a change of +1.77%, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index by 1.08 percentage points and underperforming the ChiNext Index by 1.40 percentage points [4] - The chemical industry is expected to continue its trend of differentiated performance in 2025, with recommendations to focus on synthetic biology, pesticides, chromatography media, sugar substitutes, vitamins, light hydrocarbon chemicals, COC polymers, and MDI [4] - The supply of third-generation refrigerants is entering a high prosperity cycle due to quota policies, with demand remaining stable amid market expansion [5] - The electronic specialty gases market presents significant domestic substitution opportunities due to high technical barriers and increasing demand from semiconductor, display, and photovoltaic sectors [6][8] - The trend of light hydrocarbon chemicals is becoming global, with a shift towards lighter raw materials for olefin production, which is expected to lead to a revaluation of leading companies in this sector [8] - The MDI market is characterized by oligopoly, with a favorable supply structure expected as demand gradually recovers [12] Summary by Sections Industry Review - The chemical sector's performance for the week of July 14-18, 2025, showed a rise of 1.77%, ranking 11th among sectors [22] - The top three performing sub-sectors were synthetic resins, membrane materials, and polyurethanes, while the bottom three were oil product trading, compound fertilizers, and organic silicon [24] Supply Side Tracking - A total of 155 companies in the chemical industry had their production capacities affected this week, with 1 new shutdown and 7 restarts reported [14] Key Industry Dynamics - A fire at Covestro's plant in Germany led to supply disruptions for key products, including TDI, due to a chlorine supply interruption [35] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced upcoming growth stabilization plans for ten key industries, including petrochemicals [35]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" (maintained) [2] Core Views - The company plans to invest 100 million RMB in Lif Biotechnology, acquiring a 7.0175% stake, which is a strategic move to position itself in the bio-based polyester industry chain [6][7] - Lif Biotechnology is a leading manufacturer of bio-based FDCA, a key material in the "green chemistry" sector, which has the potential to replace petrochemical-based PET in the long term [6][7] - The investment is expected to create synergies with the company's existing polyester business, despite short-term challenges such as the target company's losses and industrialization risks [7] Financial Summary - The company’s projected net profits for 2025, 2026, and 2027 are 1.344 billion, 1.845 billion, and 2.234 billion RMB respectively, with corresponding P/E ratios of 12.65, 9.21, and 7.61 [8] - Revenue is expected to grow from 67.091 billion RMB in 2024 to 81.610 billion RMB in 2027, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6.5% [11] - The gross margin is projected to improve from 5.6% in 2024 to 7.5% in 2027, indicating enhanced profitability [11]

Group 1: Report Overview - Report Title: "固收周报 - 债市回调，但情绪依然乐观 —— 债市情绪面周报（7 月第 3 周）" [1] - Report Type: Fixed Income Weekly Report [10][16][28] - Analysts: Yan Ziqi, Hong Ziyan [3] Group 2: Core Views - Current bond market situation: Sellers are bullish, while buyers expect a sideways trend. Recent anti - involution and consumption policies, along with the strength of the infrastructure sector, have led to a weak performance in the bond market. After the major tax period, the capital market is generally stable, with a slight increase in interest rates [3]. - Outlook for the future: The probability of unexpected incremental policies in the Politburo meeting in July is low. The market still expects the central bank to restart treasury bond trading. There are still uncertainties in the Sino - US tariff situation in August. It is expected that the fundamental situation in the second half of the year will not be negative for the bond market. At the micro - level, as large banks increase their net purchases of certificates of deposit and short - term treasury bonds, the steepening of the yield curve may continue. The bond market has been sideways for three months, and the use of various investment strategies by investors is quite saturated, with high market congestion, so the probability of continued sideways movement is high [3]. - Market sentiment: Nearly 60% of fixed - income sellers are still bullish on the bond market this week, but the sentiment has declined compared to last week. Fixed - income buyers' views are generally neutral to bullish, and the sentiment index has remained unchanged for two weeks [3][4]. Group 3: Seller and Buyer Market 3.1 Seller Market - Sentiment index: The weighted sentiment index is 0.37, and the unweighted index is 0.54, down 0.1 from last week. 15 institutions are bullish, 10 are neutral, and 1 are bearish [11]. - Bullish institutions (58%): Key factors include lack of support on the commodity demand side, reduced sensitivity of the bond market to equities, and stable capital operation after the tax period [11]. - Neutral institutions (38%): Key factors include the neutral impact of the unfreezing of pledged bonds on the bond market, resilient economic data, and accelerated issuance of local government bonds in the future [11]. - Bearish institutions (4%): Key factors include that the unfreezing of pledged bonds does not mean the central bank will restart bond purchases, and the stock - bond ratio leads to an increase in bond market interest rates [11]. 3.2 Buyer Market - Sentiment index: The sentiment index is 0.13, remaining unchanged from last week. 5 institutions are bullish, and 13 are neutral [12]. - Bullish institutions (28%): Key factors include the resonance of slowing nominal GDP growth and monetary easing, average economic data, a friendly central bank attitude, and increased fiscal fund investment [12]. - Neutral institutions (72%): Key factors include that the impact of the tax period on the capital market has not completely ended, the stock - bond跷跷板 effect still exists, good production, investment, and export data, possible improvement in Sino - US relations, uncertainties in the Politburo meeting at the end of the month, and the need for substantial news to break the deadlock [12]. Group 4: Bond Market Segments 4.1 Credit Bonds - Market trends: Financial management funds are entering the market, and the Science and Technology Innovation Bond ETF is expanding. The spread is expected to compress slightly due to the entry of financial management funds and the support from the central bank for science and technology innovation bonds [19][20]. 4.2 Convertible Bonds - Market view: Institutions are generally bullish this week. All 8 institutions hold a bullish attitude, supported by short - term supply - demand issues, the allocation demand of fixed - income + institutions, the urgency of conversion near maturity, and clause games [22]. Group 5: Treasury Bond Futures Tracking 5.1 Futures Trading - Price: As of July 18, the prices of TS/TF/T/TL contracts were 102.43 yuan, 105.99 yuan, 108.79 yuan, and 120.46 yuan respectively, down 0.02 yuan, 0.01 yuan, 0.04 yuan, and 0.15 yuan from last Friday [24]. - Open interest: The open interest of TS/TF/T/TL contracts decreased by 1753, 4914, 5152, and 3403 hands respectively compared to last Friday [24]. - Trading volume: From a 5 - day moving average perspective, the trading volumes of TS/TF/T/TL contracts decreased by 170.93 billion yuan, 117.46 billion yuan, 106.42 billion yuan, and 128.95 billion yuan respectively compared to last Friday [24]. - Trading volume to open interest ratio: The trading volume to open interest ratios of TS/TF/T/TL contracts decreased by 0.07, 0.07, 0.04, and 0.09 respectively compared to last Friday [25]. 5.2 Spot Bond Trading - Turnover rate: The turnover rates of 30 - year treasury bonds, interest - rate bonds, and 10 - year China Development Bank bonds all decreased. On July 18, the turnover rates were 2.86%, 0.82%, and 5.14% respectively, down 3.17pct, 0.15pct, and 0.44pct from last week [32][43]. 5.3 Basis Trading - Basis: The basis of TS and T main contracts widened, while others narrowed. As of July 18, the basis of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were 0.003 yuan, 0.01 yuan, 0.06 yuan, and 0.22 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.003 yuan, - 0.01 yuan, +0.06 yuan, and - 0.12 yuan from last Friday [41]. - Net basis: The net basis of TF and TL main contracts widened, while others narrowed. As of July 18, the net basis of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were - 0.01 yuan, - 0.02 yuan, 0.02 yuan, and - 0.05 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.01 yuan, - 0.002 yuan, +0.08 yuan, and - 0.08 yuan from last Friday [42][45]. - IRR: The IRR of main contracts showed mixed trends. As of July 18, the IRR of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were 1.56%, 1.65%, 1.37%, and 1.71% respectively, with changes of - 0.02%, +0.06%, - 0.39%, and +0.36% from last Friday [45]. 5.4 Spread Trading - Inter - delivery spread: The inter - delivery spread of T contracts widened, while others narrowed. As of July 18, the near - month minus far - month spreads of TS/TF/T/TL contracts were - 0.07 yuan, - 0.06 yuan, - 0.05 yuan, and 0.18 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.03 yuan, +0.05 yuan, - 0.01 yuan, and +0 yuan from last Friday [52]. - Inter - product spread: Except for the 3*T - TL contract, the inter - product spreads of other main contracts widened. As of July 18, 2*TS - TF, 2*TF - T, 4*TS - T, and 3*T - TL were 98.86 yuan, 103.20 yuan, 300.93 yuan, and 205.90 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.01 yuan, +0.06 yuan, +0.09 yuan, and - 0.03 yuan from last Friday [53].

Market Overview - The潮玩 industry in China is in a rapid growth phase, with low per capita spending on潮玩, indicating high growth potential[4] - Emerging markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America show significant growth potential due to demographic advantages and rapid e-commerce penetration[4] - Mature markets in North America and Europe are experiencing a shift in consumer demand from traditional content IP to emerging image IP due to market saturation and changing media consumption habits[4] IP Lifecycle and Characteristics - Content IP generally has a longer lifecycle compared to image IP, with a higher ceiling for derivative value due to a complete worldview[4] - Image IP tends to experience rapid bursts of popularity but relies heavily on ongoing management for sustained value[4] Company Analysis - Pop Mart's growth is not limited by existing IP like Labubu; its core advantage lies in its ability to cultivate new IP efficiently, emphasizing an industrialized approach to the IP ecosystem[4] - Big Media's IP business, backed by Alibaba, has strong operational capabilities and can attract quality IP rights holders and downstream customers[4] - Blucol's strategy focuses on strong IP and low-price products, with significant growth potential in lower-tier markets[4] - Card Game's core advantage is its channel strength, with a focus on managing inventory and capitalizing on market trends[4] Investment Recommendations - The潮玩 industry in China is recommended for investment due to its rapid growth and low PEG ratios compared to global peers, with a focus on companies like Pop Mart (9992.HK), Big Media (1060.HK), Blucol (0325.HK), and Card Game (not yet listed)[4] Risk Factors - Potential risks include underperformance in copyright renewals, intensified industry competition, and production capacity issues[4]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Hold" [1] Core Views - The report highlights a significant divergence in performance among companies as they release their semi-annual earnings forecasts, with some companies showing remarkable growth while others face declines [3][19] - Key drivers for growth include market expansion, product upgrades, operational efficiency improvements, and effective cost control [21][24] Summary by Sections Semi-Annual Earnings Forecasts - Jiangxin Home reported a net profit of 410-460 million yuan for H1 2025, representing a year-on-year growth of 43.70%-61.23% [21] - Aorijin expects a net profit of 850-960 million yuan for H1 2025, with a growth rate of 55%-75% [21] - Zhongshun Jierou anticipates a net profit of 140-160 million yuan, reflecting a growth of 59.85%-82.68% [24] - Saifutian forecasts a turnaround with a net profit of 2.55-3.80 million yuan, compared to a loss of 12.49 million yuan in the previous year [23] Market Performance - From July 14 to July 18, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.69%, while the ShenZhen Component Index increased by 2.04% [25] - The light industry manufacturing index rose by 0.08%, ranking 21st among 31 sectors, while the textile and apparel index increased by 0.24%, ranking 19th [25] Key Data Tracking - Real estate data shows a significant decline in property transactions, with a 35.98% decrease in the transaction area of commercial housing in major cities [34] - The price of cotton in China is reported at 15,508 yuan per ton, with a week-on-week increase of 1.59% [12] - The report indicates a notable increase in furniture sales, with June 2025 sales reaching 20.77 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 28.7% [9]