Group 1 - The core viewpoint indicates a significant decline in bond futures prices across various maturities, with the 30-year bond futures dropping by 2.7% and the 10-year bond futures down by 0.4% since September [1] - The equity market's strength is exerting pressure on the bond market, leading to a noticeable "see-saw" effect between stocks and bonds, as liquidity shifts from the bond market to equities [1] - Economic data from August shows weakness, with the official manufacturing PMI improving but still below the growth line, indicating economic pressure [1] Group 2 - The article highlights the importance of responding to potential liquidity tightening risks, suggesting strategies for hedging in such scenarios [2] - Historical research indicates that the basis is significantly influenced by funding rates, with tightening conditions favoring long positions in bond futures [2] - The article recommends participating in interest rate flattening strategies and prioritizing the "short TS long T" arbitrage strategy, as the net basis showed a pattern of first expanding and then contracting in September [2]

交易咨询资格号： 证监许可[2012]112 2025 年 9 月 26 日 | | [Table_Finance] | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 联系人：王竣冬 | 2025/9/26 | | 基于基本面研判 | | | | 期货从业资格：F3024685 | 趋势空头 | 震荡偏空 | 震 荡 | 震荡偏多 | 趋势多头 | | 交易咨询从业证书号：Z0013759 | | 锌 | 上证50股指期货 | 沥青 | | | | | 液化石油气 | 原油 | 三十债 | | | 研究咨询电话： | | 氧化铝 | 中证500股指期货 | 十债 | | | | | 鸡蛋 | 中证1000指数期货 | 工业硅 | | | 0531-81678626 | | 纯碱 | 沪深300股指期货 | 二债 | | | | | | 尿素 | 五债 | | | 客服电话： | | | 铝 | 对二甲苯 | | | | | | 烧碱 | 乙二醇 | | | 400-618-6767 | | | 多晶硅 | 短纤 | | | | | | 棉纱 | PTA | | ...

Group 1 - The total scale of public funds in China has surpassed 36 trillion yuan, reaching 36.25 trillion yuan by the end of August, with a monthly increase of 1.18 trillion yuan [1] - The scale of bond funds has slightly decreased by 28.5 billion yuan due to the stock-bond seesaw effect [1] - The U.S. GDP growth for the second quarter has been revised up to 3.8%, the highest in nearly two years, indicating stronger inflationary pressures with a PCE price index of 2.6% [1][7] Group 2 - The U.S. stock market indices have experienced three consecutive declines, with the 2-year Treasury yield rising and prices for gold and crude oil increasing [1] - The financing balance in the Chinese market increased by 14.08 billion yuan to 24,141.23 billion yuan, indicating a more volatile market in September compared to July and August [2][11] - The market is currently in a high-level consolidation phase after a prolonged period of rising, with a divergence in bullish and bearish forces [2][11] Group 3 - The international oil market is affected by Russia's partial ban on diesel exports and extended ban on gasoline exports, leading to fuel shortages in certain regions [3][14] - The U.S. initial jobless claims have decreased to 218,000, the lowest since July, indicating a tightening labor market [3][14] - The International Energy Agency reports a significant acceleration in the decline of global oil and gas field production, primarily due to increased reliance on shale oil and deep-sea resources [3][14] Group 4 - The glass futures market continues to rebound, with production enterprise inventories decreasing by 1.42 million heavy boxes to 53.29 million heavy boxes [4][18] - The soda ash futures market has also seen a slight rebound, with inventories down by 54,000 tons to 1.444 million tons [4][18] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has released a plan to stabilize growth in ten key industries, leading to positive expectations for future supply changes in the glass industry [4][18]

Group 1 - The bond futures market continued to decline overall, with a slight rebound in the afternoon, as the 30-year main contract rose by 0.11% while the 10-year, 5-year, and 2-year contracts fell by 0.01% each [1] - As of 4:30 PM, the yields on major interbank government bonds showed mixed results, with the 10-year government bond yield decreasing by 0.75 basis points to 1.8075%, while the 30-year bond yield remained unchanged at 2.114% [1][2] - Recent adjustments in the bond market are attributed to multiple factors, including unmet policy expectations and increased short-term redemption costs for bond funds due to new public fund fee regulations [3] Group 2 - The recent bond market adjustments have led to a rise in the yields of the 10-year and 30-year government bonds, reaching previous highs, indicating a potential shift in market dynamics [2][3] - Analysts suggest that the current market volatility may define future trading ranges, with the possibility of a rebound in the short term, while the medium to long-term outlook remains uncertain [3] - Investment strategies recommended include cautious trading for short-term funds and gradual allocation for long-term investments, focusing on high-quality short to medium-duration bonds [3]

Core Insights - The overall liquidity in the interbank market remained balanced in August 2025, with a decrease in trading volume and balances in the money market, while major repo rates declined [1][2] - The Shanghai Composite Index reached a nearly 10-year high, and the recovery of VAT on government bond interest income contributed to a decrease in bond issuance and trading [1][4] - Long-term bond yields continued to rise, with the yield curve steepening, and the interest rate swap curve shifted upward [1][6] Group 1: Liquidity and Market Operations - The central bank maintained a supportive liquidity stance, with significant net injections in the open market, totaling 446.6 billion yuan for the month [2] - The central bank's MLF and reverse repos saw substantial net injections, with MLF at 300 billion yuan and reverse repos at 300 billion yuan [2] - Major repo rates, including overnight repo rates, saw slight declines, with DR001 and R001 down to 1.35% and 1.40% respectively [2][3] Group 2: Bond Market Dynamics - In August, the interbank market issued bonds totaling 4.72 trillion yuan, a decrease of 10.8% month-on-month and 13% year-on-year [4] - The net financing from bonds was 1.87 trillion yuan, reflecting a month-on-month decrease of 18.7% and a year-on-year decrease of 19.2% [4] - The yields on long-term government bonds fluctuated, with the 10-year bond yield ranging from 1.69% to 1.85%, and the yield curve steepening [4][5] Group 3: Interest Rate Swaps and Trading Activity - The interest rate swap curve shifted upward, with significant increases in long-term swap rates, particularly for 5-year and 10-year swaps [6] - The average daily trading volume for RMB interest rate swaps decreased, with a total nominal principal of 4.1 trillion yuan, reflecting a 3% decline [6][7] - Standard bond futures and interest rate options also saw a decrease in daily trading volume, indicating reduced market activity [7]

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report highlights a significant trend in the banking wealth management sector, with companies increasingly focusing on index-based products to enhance their offerings and meet market demands [4][11] - The collaboration between financial institutions, such as the partnership between Huaxia Wealth and Huaxia Fund, aims to create a robust index ecosystem to support high-quality development in asset management [13][14] - The report notes the successful IPO of Hesai Technology, marking a significant event in the market, with postal wealth management participating in this investment [15][16] - The introduction of the Shanghai Sci-Tech Financial Theme Wealth Management Product by Puyin Wealth Management reflects a strategic move to align with national innovation policies and support local tech enterprises [18] Summary by Sections 1. Regulatory and Industry Dynamics - Wealth management companies are actively launching index-based products, with an increase in both the number and issuance of such products in the market [4][11] - The core motivation for this shift includes reducing active management risks, enhancing strategy transparency, and meeting customized client demands through self-constructed indices [12] 2. Peer Innovation Dynamics - Huaxia Wealth and Huaxia Fund have signed a memorandum to deepen cooperation in the index business, aiming to build a market-influential index ecosystem [13][14] - Puyin Wealth Management has launched a new product focused on technology finance, raising 220 million yuan to support quality tech enterprises in Shanghai [18] 3. Yield Performance - Cash management products recorded a 7-day annualized yield of 1.29%, remaining stable compared to the previous week, while money market funds saw a slight increase to 1.19% [19][20] - The report indicates a general recovery in annualized yields for fixed-income products across various maturities [23][27] 4. Net Value Tracking - The net value ratio of banking wealth management products decreased to 2.04%, down by 0.61 percentage points, indicating a positive trend in credit spreads [29][32]

Key Insights - The expectation of a Federal Reserve interest rate cut has significantly increased, with market predictions exceeding 90% probability, driven by weak economic data, particularly in the labor market [8][9] - The credit bond market is experiencing a cooling trend, with issuance down to 13,127.58 billion yuan in August, a decrease of 1,349.78 billion yuan from the previous month, and net financing dropping to 543.99 billion yuan [10][49] - The monthly rolling default rate in the bond market is at 0.17%, with one new defaulting entity, Shenzhen Zhongzhuang, indicating ongoing credit risks [21][24] Market Review - The manufacturing PMI in August slightly improved to 49.4, indicating a weak recovery in the economy, while liquidity remains generally ample with the central bank injecting 1,466 billion yuan [10][36] - The average issuance rate for credit bonds has mostly increased, with the 3-year AAA corporate bond rate rising by 16 basis points, reflecting higher borrowing costs across various sectors [49][50] - The secondary market saw most bond yields rise, with the 10-year government bond yield increasing by 13 basis points to 1.84% [12][30] Credit Risk and Regulatory Environment - The ongoing high-pressure regulatory environment for implicit debt emphasizes the need to prevent "disposal risk" [11][12] - Five entities, including those in the real estate sector, have extended their bonds due to operational performance declines and cash flow issues, highlighting the challenges faced by these industries [24][25] - Credit spreads for short-term notes have generally widened, with most sectors experiencing increased issuance costs [30][51]

Report Summary 1. Investment Rating No investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core View The report suggests that Treasury bond futures are expected to trade in a low - level range in the short term, with both upward and downward pressures. There is potential for medium - to long - term interest rate cuts, but the possibility of an immediate full - scale rate cut is low [1][5]. 3. Summary by Section 3.1 Variety View Reference - Financial Futures Stock Index Sector - For the TL2512 variety, the short - term view is "sideways", the medium - term view is "sideways", the intraday view is "sideways - bullish", and the overall view is "sideways". The core logic is that there are still medium - to long - term expectations of interest rate cuts, but the possibility of a short - term full - scale rate cut is low [1]. 3.2 Main Variety Price and Market Driving Logic - Financial Futures Stock Index Sector - The varieties include TL, T, TF, and TS. The intraday view is "sideways - bullish", the medium - term view is "sideways", and the reference view is "sideways". - The core logic is that Treasury bond futures fluctuated and rose yesterday. Although the September LPR remained unchanged, there is still potential for medium - to long - term interest rate cuts. The weak credit data in August, the marginal slowdown in consumption growth, and the weak inflation data have increased the expectation of macro - policies to stabilize demand in the fourth quarter. With the Fed's rate cut in September and two more expected cuts this year, there is still an expectation of monetary easing in the future, providing strong support for Treasury bond futures in the medium - to long - term. - However, the upward momentum of Treasury bond futures is insufficient. Firstly, there is no high need for an immediate full - scale rate cut, which needs to be coordinated with fiscal policies. Secondly, the stock - bond seesaw effect suppresses the demand for Treasury bonds [5].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - No information about the industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - The current position of ultra - long bonds has both trading and allocation value. The ultra - long bond spread is expected to gradually repair, and in the second half of the fourth quarter, ultra - long bonds may decline more smoothly as the overall bond market strengthens [4][25]. - The current ultra - long bond term spread has significantly deviated from the fitted value, indicating that ultra - long bonds are oversold to some extent, and the space for the spread to continue rising is limited [3][21]. - As long as the liquidity of ultra - long bonds does not decline significantly, the spread is unlikely to return to the level before 2024, and currently, there is no basis for the spread to continue rising [3][24]. 3. Summaries According to Relevant Contents 3.1 Current Situation of Ultra - long Bonds - During the recent bond market adjustment, ultra - long bonds fell significantly, and the 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond term spread widened significantly, rising from about 21bps at the beginning of July to over 30bps, reaching the highest level since 2024 [1][7]. - The 30 - year Treasury bond yield rose from about 1.85% at the beginning of July to about 2.1% (active bond) currently, and the new bond yield rose to around 2.20% [7]. 3.2 Reasons for the Widening of Ultra - long Bond Term Spread - **Risk preference**: Since July this year, the stock market has risen, and the A - share market has strengthened significantly. The Shanghai Composite Index rose from 3458 points to 3820 points from July to September 19, with a cumulative increase of 10.5%. Due to the stock - bond seesaw effect, the market's investment enthusiasm for bonds declined, and the bond yield adjusted significantly, leading to the widening of the 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond spread [1][9]. - **Supply**: Since May this year, the issuance of ultra - long - term special Treasury bonds has accelerated. Except for June with a net financing of 19.2 billion yuan, the net financing in other months exceeded 20 billion yuan, significantly higher than the first - half average of 10.97 billion yuan. The issuance of ultra - long - term special Treasury bonds led to an upward movement of secondary - market interest rates and a widening of the term spread [1][13]. - **Funds**: There is a significant negative correlation between the 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond spread and R007. Since March this year, the capital price has declined significantly. R007 dropped from the high of 2.3% at the beginning of the year to 1.5% in August, and the decline in short - term interest rates intensified the steepness of the yield curve [1][13]. 3.3 Liquidity of Ultra - long Bonds - Since 2023, the turnover rate of ultra - long bonds has increased significantly, and ultra - long bonds have changed from a configuration variety to a trading variety, bringing a price premium to ultra - long bonds. In August, the monthly turnover rate of ultra - long bonds was still as high as 7.6%, indicating that ultra - long bonds still maintain high liquidity [2][16]. 3.4 Pricing Analysis of Ultra - long Bond Term Spread - Using the monthly average of R007, the monthly turnover rate of 30 - year Treasury bonds, the net financing of ultra - long Treasury bonds over 10 years (6M MA), and the Wind All - A Index as explanatory variables, a regression analysis was conducted on the 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond spread. The regression equation has a relatively strong explanatory ability [2][20]. - The current fitted central value of the 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond spread is 22.3bps, and the upper limit is about 27bps. However, the current ultra - long bond spread has exceeded the upper limit of one - standard deviation, indicating that ultra - long bonds are oversold to some extent, and the space for the spread to continue rising is limited [3][21]. - By assuming variables from September to December, the estimated 30 - 10 - year Treasury bond spread central values from September to December are 22.1bps, 22.7bps, 27.0bps, and 28.0bps respectively, all lower than the current spread level above 30bps, indicating that the risk of the ultra - long bond spread continuing to rise in the future is limited [21].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since July, the "stock - bond seesaw" and "trading bonds based on stocks" have become key factors affecting the market, and the short - term trading logic of the bond market has shifted from fundamental and capital - based pricing to the "asset reallocation" logic under changing risk preferences [11][12]. - The evolution of the "stock - bond seesaw" can be divided into four stages: expected - driven, asset - end rebalancing, liability - end driven, and full risk - preference enhancement. The impact on the bond market deepens gradually in these stages [13][14][15]. - Currently, the market is in the second stage (asset - end rebalancing), and there are no obvious signs of moving to the third stage. The linkage between stocks and bonds is likely to remain in the second stage this year. For the bond market, it is necessary to pay attention to the stock market performance, central bank's monetary policy response, the final implementation of the new regulations on public fund sales, and the entry timing of allocation funds [6][60]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1. Stock - Bond Linkage: Four - Stage Deduction of the "Seesaw" - In specific market stages, the "asset reallocation" logic driven by institutional behavior and capital flow may become the core factor leading the bond market trend. Understanding factors such as the liability characteristics, investment strategies, and regulatory constraints of different institutions is crucial for accurately grasping the micro - structure of the bond market and predicting market fluctuations [12]. 3.2. First Stage: Expected - Driven, Initial Appearance of the "Stock - Bond Seesaw" - This stage stems from marginal changes in the macro - economic environment, policy orientation, or market risk preferences, which first affect investors' expectations, leading to an initial pattern of rising stocks and falling bonds. Although there is no obvious capital migration, expectations are reflected in asset prices, and the market tilts towards equity assets. The direct impact on the bond market is relatively small [13][21]. - In July 2025, the stock market recovered significantly, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 3.3% to 3573 points, the CSI 300 Index rising 3.4% to 4076 points, and the ChiNext Index soaring 8.4%. The bond market sentiment was under pressure, and the yields of 1Y, 5Y, 10Y, and 30Y treasury bonds increased by 4BP, 6BP, 6BP, and 9BP respectively [21][22]. - Transaction - oriented institutions (such as funds) took defensive actions, reducing bond duration and long - positions in interest - rate bonds. Allocation - oriented institutions (such as insurance and rural commercial banks) were relatively stable, with insurance continuing to increase bond holdings and rural commercial banks turning from net sellers to net buyers [24]. 3.3. Second Stage: Asset - End Rebalancing, Intra - institutional Capital Migration - As the upward trend of the stock market is confirmed and the bond market is expected to be under pressure, stock and bond assets switch characteristics. Investors may reduce bond allocation, and capital shifts from fixed - income assets to equity assets, increasing bond market volatility [14][30]. - Banks increased the issuance of equity - containing products. In July 2025, the new issuance scale of "fixed - income +" products was 40.92 billion yuan, accounting for 65% of the total issuance scale, and the proportion rose to 71% in August [31]. - Funds increased the layout of the "fixed - income +" strategy. Since 2025, the performance of "fixed - income +" funds has been better than that of pure - bond funds. The share of equity funds has increased, while that of bond funds has decreased [34][35]. - Insurance funds increased the proportion of equity allocation. Policy support and the need to meet liability costs drove insurance funds to invest more in equity assets. As of Q2 2025, the balance of insurance funds in use exceeded 36 trillion yuan, with about 4.74 trillion yuan invested in stocks and securities investment funds [40][41]. 3.4. Third Stage: Liability - End Driven, Cross - institutional Capital Migration - When the "stock - bond seesaw" effect intensifies, capital migrates across institutions and products. Investor redemptions force institutions to sell bond assets passively, potentially forming a negative feedback loop and exerting significant selling pressure on the bond market [5][45]. - In some periods from August to September 2025, there were signs of the third stage, but the overall impact was controllable. On August 18, the A - share market rose, and bond - type funds were mainly redeemed by wealth management, trust, futures, and securities firms. On September 9, due to the public fund fee reform and market news, investors redeemed bond funds, and bond yields rose rapidly [45][46]. - The redemption of bond funds by wealth management and bank self - operation may lead to a negative feedback loop in the bond market. Wealth management first redeems bond funds, then bond funds sell bonds, which further drives down bond prices and triggers more redemptions [47][48]. 3.5. Fourth Stage: Full Risk - Preference Enhancement, "Reversal after Reaching the Extreme" - When the "stock - bond seesaw" effect reaches its extreme, there is a large - scale migration of capital from low - risk to high - risk assets. This is a systematic asset allocation rebalancing led by individual investors, causing bond yields to rise significantly and deviate from fundamental pricing [6][53]. - Residents' deposits "move" to non - bank financial institutions, and capital continuously flows from fixed - income products to the equity market, which may lead to long - term and deep adjustments in the bond market [54][56]. - The market in 2015 is an example of the fourth - stage deduction. During the bull market in May - June 2015, a large amount of capital flowed into the stock market, and the bond market experienced significant adjustments and capital outflows. After the stock market crash, capital flowed back to the bond market [57].