Summary of Credit Bond Yield Trends in April Overall Credit Bond Performance - In April, credit bond yields exhibited a downward trend overall, with short-term spreads narrowing across the board. However, the decline in medium to long-term yields was less pronounced compared to the same maturity national development bonds, leading to a widening of credit spreads [5][9][11]. - By the end of April, short-term credit spreads remained at historically low levels, while medium to long-term financial bonds were at relatively high historical percentiles [5][11]. Industry-Specific Credit Spread Trends - **Industrial Bonds**: Most AAA-rated industrial bonds saw credit spreads widen in April. Among public bonds, the financial holding sector experienced the largest widening of 8.68 basis points, while the textile and apparel sector saw the most significant narrowing of 4.89 basis points. In private bonds, the basic chemical and retail sectors experienced slight narrowing, while other sectors generally widened by 3-10 basis points, with the steel sector widening the most at 10.86 basis points [13][15]. - **Local Government Bonds**: Credit spreads for local government bonds showed mixed trends, with lower-rated bonds generally narrowing while higher-rated bonds widened. Regions with relatively high spreads, such as Guizhou and Qinghai, mostly saw narrowing, while lower spread regions like Beijing and Shanghai experienced widening [5][9]. - **Financial Bonds**: The credit spreads for bank perpetual bonds mostly narrowed, while the spreads for securities company subordinated bonds and insurance company capital replenishment bonds widened across the board [5][9]. Historical Context - The credit spreads for various types of bonds remained at historically low levels, with AA-rated public and private industrial bonds reaching 30%-50% of their historical percentiles. Financial bonds generally had higher spread levels, exceeding the 30% historical percentile [11][12]. Key Industry Observations - In April, the steel and coal industries saw credit spreads widen across the board, with changes not exceeding 7 basis points. The high-grade bonds in these sectors experienced more significant widening. The electricity and construction engineering sectors also saw most spreads widen [15][16].

证券研究报告 固收 沿着债市定价体系找机会 华泰研究 2025 年 5 月 25 日│中国内地 利率周报 研究员 张继强 SAC No. S0570518110002 SFC No. AMB145 zhangjiqiang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 研究员 吴宇航 SAC No. S0570521090004 wuyuhang@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 研究员 仇文竹 SAC No. S0570521050002 qiuwenzhu@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 联系人 欧阳琳 SAC No. S0570123070159 ouyanglin@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 联系人 朱逸敏 SAC No. S0570124070133 zhuyimin@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 与信贷等广谱利率对比：债市定价基本合理 债券与存贷款之间会通过比价效应和机构行为传导。但本次 LPR 下调后， 一些银行通过减少加点幅度，仍维持新增按揭贷款 3%的原利率。如果 3% 是房贷利率的 ...

1. Investment Rating of the Reported Industry There is no information provided regarding the industry investment rating in the given content. 2. Core Views of the Report - The bond market is in a stalemate and under slight pressure, with ultra - long bonds rising first and then falling. The trading activity of ultra - long bonds decreased slightly last week, but it was still quite active. The term spread of ultra - long bonds narrowed, and the variety spread showed mixed trends [1][4][11]. - For the 30 - year treasury bond, as of May 23, the spread between the 30 - year and 10 - year treasury bonds was 17BP, at a historically low level. With the weakening of policy support, the probability of a decline in bond yields is higher, but the term spread protection is limited [2][12]. - For the 20 - year CDB bond, as of May 23, the spread between the 20 - year CDB bond and the 20 - year treasury bond was 2BP, at a historically extremely low level. With the weakening of policy support, the probability of a decline in bond yields is higher, but the variety spread protection is limited [3][13]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Weekly Review 3.1.1 Ultra - long Bond Review - Last week, important events included the release of April economic data (the domestic economy declined significantly compared to March but continued to develop positively), a 500 - billion MLF operation in May with a 10BP cut in LPR after half a year, balanced funds during the tax period, and a relatively high winning bid rate for the new 10 - year treasury bond on Friday, which put slight pressure on the bond market. Overall, the bond market was in a stalemate and under slight pressure, with ultra - long bonds rising first and then falling. The trading activity of ultra - long bonds decreased slightly but remained quite active. The term spread of ultra - long bonds narrowed, and the variety spread showed mixed trends [1][4][11]. 3.1.2 Ultra - long Bond Investment Outlook - **30 - year Treasury Bond**: As of May 23, the spread between the 30 - year and 10 - year treasury bonds was 17BP, at a historically low level. The April economic data showed resilience, with the estimated GDP growth rate of about 4.1% year - on - year, a 0.8% decline from March but still higher than the annual target. The CPI in April was - 0.1% and PPI was - 2.7%, indicating obvious deflation risks. With the recent easing of Sino - US trade frictions, investors' pessimistic expectations have dissipated. The short - term focus will return to the second - quarter domestic economic data. It is expected that with the weakening of policy support, the probability of a decline in bond yields is higher, but the term spread protection is limited [2][12]. - **20 - year CDB Bond**: As of May 23, the spread between the 20 - year CDB bond and the 20 - year treasury bond was 2BP, at a historically extremely low level. Similar to the 30 - year treasury bond situation, with the weakening of policy support, the probability of a decline in bond yields is higher, but the variety spread protection is limited [3][13]. 3.1.3 Ultra - long Bond Basic Overview - The balance of outstanding ultra - long bonds exceeded 21.1 trillion. As of April 30, the total amount of ultra - long bonds with a remaining term of more than 14 years was 21,157.7 billion (excluding asset - backed securities and project revenue notes), accounting for 14.2% of the total bond balance. Local government bonds and treasury bonds are the main varieties. By variety, treasury bonds accounted for 25.6% (5,422.3 billion), local government bonds accounted for 68.2% (14,427.6 billion), etc. By remaining term, the 30 - year variety had the highest proportion [14]. 3.2 Primary Market 3.2.1 Weekly Issuance - Last week (from May 12 to May 16, 2025), a large amount of ultra - long bonds were issued, with a total of 242.4 billion yuan. Compared with the previous week, the total issuance of ultra - long bonds increased significantly. By variety, treasury bonds accounted for 121 billion, local government bonds accounted for 106.4 billion, etc. By term, 15 - year bonds accounted for 22.9 billion, 20 - year bonds accounted for 37.2 billion, 30 - year bonds accounted for 132.2 billion, and 50 - year bonds accounted for 50 billion [19]. 3.2.2 This Week's Pending Issuance - The announced issuance plan for ultra - long bonds this week totals 111.7 billion yuan. By variety, ultra - long treasury bonds account for 0 billion, ultra - long local government bonds account for 104.9 billion, and ultra - long medium - term notes account for 6.9 billion [23]. 3.3 Secondary Market 3.3.1 Trading Volume - Last week, the trading of ultra - long bonds was quite active, with a trading volume of 861.7 billion yuan, accounting for 10.2% of the total bond trading volume. By variety, ultra - long treasury bonds accounted for 31.4% of the total treasury bond trading volume, ultra - long local bonds accounted for 49.6% of the total local bond trading volume, etc. Compared with the previous week, the trading activity of ultra - long bonds decreased slightly, with the trading volume decreasing by 43.8 billion yuan and the proportion decreasing by 0.5%. Among them, the trading volume of ultra - long treasury bonds decreased by 49.8 billion yuan, the trading volume of ultra - long local bonds increased by 3.1 billion yuan, etc. [26]. 3.3.2 Yield - Due to multiple important events last week, the bond market was in a stalemate and under slight pressure, with ultra - long bonds rising first and then falling. For treasury bonds, the yields of 15 - year, 20 - year, 30 - year, and 50 - year bonds changed by 2BP, - 1BP, 1BP, and 3BP to 1.88%, 1.98%, 1.89%, and 2.06% respectively. For CDB bonds, the yields of 15 - year, 20 - year, 30 - year, and 50 - year bonds changed by 0BP, 0BP, 1BP, and 3BP to 1.94%, 2.00%, 2.07%, and 2.30% respectively. For local bonds, the yields of 15 - year, 20 - year, and 30 - year bonds changed by 0BP, 0BP, and - 2BP to 2.08%, 2.12%, and 2.11% respectively. For railway bonds, the yields of 15 - year, 20 - year, and 30 - year bonds changed by - 3BP, - 4BP, and 0BP to 2.00%, 2.04%, and 2.13% respectively. For representative individual bonds, the yield of the 30 - year treasury bond active bond 24 Special Treasury Bond 06 changed by 1BP to 1.95%, and the yield of the 20 - year CDB bond active bond 21 CDB 20 changed by 0BP to 1.98% [33][34]. 3.3.3 Spread Analysis - **Term Spread**: Last week, the term spread of ultra - long bonds narrowed, and the absolute level was low. The spread between the 30 - year and 10 - year treasury bonds was 17BP, a change of - 3BP from the previous week, at the 1% quantile since 2010 [42]. - **Variety Spread**: Last week, the variety spread of ultra - long bonds showed mixed trends, and the absolute level was low. The spread between the 20 - year CDB bond and the treasury bond was 2BP, and the spread between the 20 - year railway bond and the treasury bond was 5BP, changing by 2BP and - 4BP respectively from the previous week, at the 4% and 2% quantiles since 2010 [46]. 3.4 30 - year Treasury Bond Futures - Last week, the main contract of the 30 - year treasury bond futures, TL2509, closed at 119.60 yuan, an increase of 0.32%. The total trading volume was 469,900 lots (a decrease of 182,500 lots), and the open interest was 129,300 lots (an increase of 6,141 lots). The trading volume decreased significantly compared with the previous week, while the open interest increased slightly [48].

【市场表现】 昨日期债延续窄幅震荡。短期看，一方面期债下跌的风险有限，当前仍处在逆周期政策周期中，资金面 持续收紧的可能性小，MLF增量续作也体现了央行对资金面的呵护，LPR与存款利率双调降，中期广谱 利率处于下行周期中；另一方面在关税压力缓释的背景下，当下央行进一步引导资金利率下行的概率也 不高，还需要观察政策后效和出口动向，目前整体或以稳为主，从期限利差的角度来看长债目前吸引力 也相对有限。短期信息空窗期，整体债市或进入震荡阶段，等待基本面指引。目前预计，短期10年期国 债利率可能在1.65%-1.7%区间波动，30年国债利率可能在1.85%-1.95%区间波动。单边策略上建议观望 为主，关注高频经济数据和资金面动态。 免责声明：本报告中的信息均来源于被广发期货有限公司认为可靠的已公开资料，但广发期货对这些信 息的准确性及完整性不作任何保证。在任何情况下，报告内容仅供参考，报告中的信息或所表达的意见 并不构成所述品种买卖的出价或询价，投资者据此投资，风险自担。本报告的最终所有权归报告的来源 机构所有，客户在接收到本报告后，应遵循报告来源机构对报告的版权规定，不得刊载或转发。 国债期货收盘涨跌不一，30年期 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Long - term credit bonds adjusted with interest rates, while short - term credit bond spreads significantly compressed. This week, affected by the easing of Sino - US trade tariff policies, market interest rates fluctuated upward. Credit bond trends were differentiated, with long - end yields adjusting with interest rates and medium - short - end yields falling. Credit spreads of various types of credit bonds compressed, with short - term varieties having a larger decline [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads declined. Spreads of urban investment bonds generally decreased this week, with different levels of decline for platforms of different external subject ratings and in different regions and administrative levels [2][9]. - Industrial bond spreads generally declined, and the spreads of mixed - ownership real estate bonds significantly compressed. Central and local state - owned real estate bond spreads decreased, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads dropped significantly, and private real - estate bond spreads slightly increased. Spreads of coal, chemical, and steel bonds also declined [2][19]. - Secondary and perpetual bond spreads were generally stable, and their overall performance was weaker than that of ordinary credit bonds. Most yields of secondary and perpetual bonds followed the interest rate upward, with only some weakly - qualified varieties slightly falling [2][29]. - Industrial perpetual excess spreads were basically flat, and urban investment perpetual excess spreads slightly declined [2][32]. Summary by Directory 1. Long - term credit bonds adjusted with interest rates, short - term credit bond spreads significantly compressed - Market interest rates fluctuated upward. 1Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y maturity China Development Bank bond yields increased by 3BP, 3BP, 6BP, 6BP, and 5BP respectively [2][5]. - Credit bond trends were differentiated. 1Y maturity credit bond yields of all grades decreased by 3 - 6BP, 3Y maturity yields decreased by 0 - 2BP, 5Y maturity yields increased by 1 - 2BP, and 7Y and 10Y maturity yields increased by 2 - 3BP [2][5]. - Credit spreads compressed. 1Y maturity credit bond spreads of all grades decreased by 6 - 9BP, 3Y, 5Y, and 7Y maturity spreads decreased by 3 - 5BP, and 10Y maturity spreads decreased by 2BP. Rating spreads and term spreads were differentiated [2][5]. 2. Urban investment bond spreads declined - Spreads of different rating platforms declined. AAA - rated platform credit spreads decreased by 7BP, while AA+ and AA - rated platform spreads decreased by 8BP [2][9]. - Regional spreads showed different declines. In different provinces, spreads of AAA - rated platforms mostly decreased by 6 - 8BP, AA+ - rated platforms mostly decreased by 7 - 9BP, and AA - rated platforms mostly decreased by 6 - 8BP. Different regions had different decline amplitudes [9][11][12]. - Spreads of different administrative levels declined. Provincial, municipal, and district - county - level platform credit spreads decreased by 7BP, 7BP, and 8BP respectively [2][15]. 3. Industrial bond spreads generally declined, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads significantly compressed - Real estate bond spreads varied. Central and local state - owned real estate bond spreads decreased by 6 - 7BP, mixed - ownership real estate bond spreads decreased by 104BP, and private real - estate bond spreads increased by 4BP. Spreads of some real - estate companies like Longfor and Vanke also changed [2][19]. - Spreads of other industrial bonds declined. Spreads of coal, chemical, and steel bonds decreased, with coal and chemical bonds decreasing by 7BP and steel bonds decreasing by 8BP [2][19]. 4. Secondary and perpetual bond spreads were generally stable, overall performance was weaker than that of ordinary credit bonds - Yields and spreads of different terms and grades changed. 1Y maturity secondary capital bonds and AA+ and above perpetual bonds' yields increased by 2 - 3BP, with spreads decreasing by 0 - 1BP; AA - rated perpetual bond yields decreased by 1BP, with spreads decreasing by 4BP. Similar changes occurred in 3Y and 5Y maturity bonds [2][29]. 5. Industrial perpetual excess spreads were basically flat, urban investment perpetual excess spreads slightly declined - Industrial perpetual excess spreads were stable. The AAA3Y excess spread was 11.71BP, at the 20.54% quantile since 2015, and the AAA5Y excess spread was 9.22BP, at the 9.54% quantile [2][32]. - Urban investment perpetual excess spreads declined slightly. The AAA3Y urban investment perpetual bond excess spread decreased by 0.03BP to 7.25BP, at the 3.45% quantile; the AAA5Y excess spread decreased by 0.89BP to 10.56BP, at the 9.68% quantile [2][32]. 6. Credit Spread Database Compilation Instructions - Market credit spreads and related excess spreads were calculated based on ChinaBond medium - short - term notes and perpetual bonds data, with historical quantiles starting from the beginning of 2015. Credit spreads of urban investment and industrial bonds were compiled and statistically analyzed by the R & D center of Cinda Securities, also with historical quantiles starting from 2015 [38]. - Calculation methods were provided for industrial and urban investment individual bond credit spreads, bank secondary capital bond/perpetual bond excess spreads, and industrial/urban investment perpetual bond excess spreads [38][39]. - Sample selection criteria were given, including selecting medium - term notes and public corporate bonds, excluding guaranteed and perpetual bonds, and removing bonds with remaining maturities below 0.5 years or above 5 years. Different rating types were used for different bond types [40].

双降之后，债市行情从短端开始修复，收益率曲线进入兑现阶段。长端调整幅 度较大，主要受协议签订后整体风险偏好显著修复的影响。从宏观角度看，债 市逻辑变化较大。4 月份外部冲击明显加强导致收益率下行约十个 BP 左右。5 月初降息落地后政策利率调降十个 BP，对长端定价有同等幅度的估值下行。然 而协议达成超预期，中间有三个月缓冲期，这期间可能出现强劲出口变化、国 内需求端边际强化及价格端变化，带来短期宏观趋势逻辑明显变化。 摘要 • 政策利率下调 10BP 后，长端利率面临不确定性，三个月缓冲期内出口、 需求和价格可能出现变化，导致长端利率近期或维持震荡调整，难以找到 明确主线。 • 期限利差压缩至 20BP 以下，表明长端行情变动可能性小，应关注短端修 复。降准及货币政策组合拳使得流动性乐观，资金价格中枢预计移至 1.4- 1.5 附近，或阶段性突破 1.4。 • 大规模结构性货币政策（如再贷款）超预期，央行或迎来中长期流动性投 放高峰，资金价格可能向下偏离政策利率，类似于 2020 年以来的超常规 宽松。 • 存款利率调降对银行流动性有影响，但受结构性货币政策支撑，当前流动 性略偏松。银行投放高峰期，新价格证 ...

Group 1 - The report highlights that the Shanghai Stock Exchange has tightened the issuance of municipal investment bonds, making it more difficult for weaker quality issuers to finance [2][7][8] - The newly implemented guidelines include increased scrutiny on issuers with high proportions of inventory and receivables, as well as those with low EBITDA relative to interest expenses [12][8] - The special treasury bond injection into four major banks is expected to enhance their core Tier 1 capital adequacy ratios by approximately 1 percentage point, with the Agricultural Bank of China likely to receive additional support due to its lower capital adequacy [9][10] Group 2 - Credit bond yields have generally declined, with notable compressions in credit spreads across various sectors, particularly in the banking sector, which saw a reduction of 8 basis points [3][4][18] - The report indicates that the credit spreads for municipal investment bonds have also compressed, with no overdue non-standard municipal bonds reported in recent weeks [19][22] - The strategy outlook suggests focusing on short-duration opportunities as credit spreads may widen in the future due to lower supply of credit bonds compared to interest rate bonds [6][30]

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided on the report industry investment rating Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - On April 2, Trump announced "reciprocal tariffs", setting a 10% minimum benchmark tariff for trading partners, with higher - tariff economies including China (34%), EU (20%), Vietnam (46%), India (26%), Japan (24%), etc., and also re - emphasized 25% auto tariffs and announced a 25% tariff on all imported beer, which increased capital market volatility [2] - On April 3, in the domestic bond market, the yields of various maturities declined, with the 10Y Treasury bonds 240011 and 250004 down about 5bp, and the decline of ultra - long bonds > long bonds > medium - short bonds [3] - After the "reciprocal tariffs" shock, the bond market is close to the pricing of unchanged short - term interest rate center + historical minimum term spread. The subsequent market decline needs to focus on the influx of risk - averse funds into the bond market and the opening of the broad - money window. The 10 - year Treasury bond is likely to fluctuate in the range of 1.70% - 1.80%. Active bonds are more cost - effective during the bond - replacement period, and some secondary - active bonds may over - adjust due to temporary tightening of funds [6] Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Impact of Tariff Announcement - Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" announcement was a major surprise to the market, targeting multiple economies and increasing capital market volatility [2] 2. Bond Market Performance on April 3 - The domestic bond market priced in the tariff impact in the morning, with the yields of 10Y Treasury bonds 240011 and 250004 dropping by about 5bp, and the decline pattern of different - maturity bonds was ultra - long bonds > long bonds > medium - short bonds [3] 3. Three Perspectives on the Subsequent Bond Market 3.1. Tariff's Impact on Fundamental Expectations and Term Spread - Tariffs increase pessimistic expectations about the economic fundamentals. When there are such expectations, term spreads like 10Y - 1Y and 30Y - 10Y usually compress. Given the current short - term interest rate above 1.5% (1.54% on April 2) and the 10Y - 1Y term spread compressed to 25bp, the short - term interest rate is approaching the theoretical lower limit of 1.74% (calculated based on the historical minimum term spread of 20bp) [3] 3.2. Conditions for Further Decline in Short - term Interest Rates - A further decline in short - term interest rates depends on broad - money policies, but the window may not open immediately. The pressure to stabilize the economy has increased, and the expectation of reserve requirement ratio cuts and interest rate cuts has risen again. However, stabilizing the exchange rate restricts broad - money policies in the short term, the space for broad - money policies is limited compared to 2018, and the probability of broad - money policies in May - June to cooperate with government bond issuance is higher, while the net financing pressure in April is relatively small [4] 3.3. Focus on Institutional Behavior when the 10 - year Treasury Bond Fluctuates between 1.70% - 1.80% - In the current bond - replacement market, 240011 may face upward pressure because the short - selling force of 240011 is still strong (as shown by the increase in bond lending volume after the quarter), and 250004 is about to replace 240011 as the active bond, so its interest rate may rise due to liquidity pricing [5][6] - The secondary - active bonds of 30Y Treasury bonds may also face upward pressure. Although the funds have loosened, the negative Carry phenomenon still exists. During the Q2 when there is a 30Y Treasury bond issuance plan, the secondary - active bonds may over - adjust after the seasonal tightening of funds [6]