Group 1: Industrial Production - Industrial production remains stable, with a slight year-on-year decrease in blast furnace operating rates by 0.2 percentage points to 2.1% [2][5] - The chemical chain shows resilience, with soda ash operating rates increasing by 2.7 percentage points, while PTA and polyester filament operating rates are stable compared to the previous week [2][15] - The automotive semi-steel tire operating rate has significantly decreased, down 4.4 percentage points to 6.7% year-on-year [2][15] Group 2: Construction Industry - The construction industry is experiencing weak performance, with a slight year-on-year decline in grinding operating rates by 0.1 percentage points to 1.9% [2][25] - Cement shipment rates have increased by 3.2 percentage points year-on-year, while asphalt operating rates have slightly risen by 0.8 percentage points to 4.3% [2][25] Group 3: Downstream Demand - New housing transactions have sharply declined, with average daily transaction area falling by 28.2% year-on-year [2][47] - Rail freight volume related to domestic demand has decreased by 2.4% year-on-year, while port cargo throughput and container throughput have also seen significant declines of 4% and 10.9% respectively [2][58] - The CCFI composite index has rebounded significantly, increasing by 3.3% month-on-month, with the West America route seeing a notable price increase of 9.6% [2][77] Group 4: Price Trends - Agricultural product prices are showing divergence, with pork and egg prices decreasing by 0.3% and 0.9% respectively, while vegetable and fruit prices have increased by 1.1% each [3][89] - The South China industrial product price index has decreased by 0.2% month-on-month, with energy and chemical prices down by 0.4% and metal prices down by 0.1% [3][100]

Group 1 - The tourism market is experiencing a strong recovery, with inbound tourism showing particularly robust growth, as evidenced by flight execution and travel orders. In 2024, domestic travel has rebounded to 56.1% of historical trends, while inbound tourism has reached 81.9% of historical trends, with travel exports recovering to 138% of 2019 levels [2][10][83] - From the perspective of visitor demographics, tourists from Southeast Asia are showing significant recovery in inbound tourism, while recovery from regions like North America is slower. In 2024, the proportion of visitors to Shanghai from Southeast Asia is 22.5%, up 6.8 percentage points from 2023, while the proportion from North America has decreased by 2 percentage points [2][17][83] - The recovery pace of China's inbound tourism market is accelerating after 2024, indicating that the tourism market's recovery is not solely dependent on scale expansion. By April 2025, inbound tourist numbers in Shanghai reached 115.3% of the 2019 average, surpassing countries like Thailand and Singapore [3][23][83] Group 2 - The increase in inbound tourism is driven by the facilitation of visa policies and cultural exports, which effectively stimulate inbound demand. Since 2024, the expansion of visa-free policies has significantly boosted inbound tourism, with 20.12 million foreign visitors entering through visa exemptions, a year-on-year increase of 112.3% [4][26][84] - Historical examples show that optimizing visa policies can effectively release inbound tourism demand. For instance, Japan's gradual relaxation of visa policies from 2013 led to a substantial increase in inbound visitors, from 8.358 million in 2012 to 31.882 million in 2019 [4][34][84] Group 3 - The potential for growth in inbound tourism is significant, as the current export of travel and entertainment services as a percentage of GDP is notably lower than that of other countries, primarily due to the low openness of the service sector. In 2024, travel exports are projected to account for only 0.1% of GDP, compared to a global average of 1.6% [6][50][61] - The Chinese government is increasing its focus on the opening of the service sector, which is expected to release substantial demand for inbound tourism. Policies aimed at enhancing service sector openness have been introduced, including a comprehensive pilot program to accelerate the opening of the service industry [7][66][61]

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭、侯倩楠 联系人 | 贾东旭 摘要 在当前宏观政策积极发力稳增长的背景下，政策性金融工具备受关注。前两轮其成效显著，本轮新型工 具何时可能落地？资金投向又会有哪些新动向？本文分析，可供参考。 短期还有哪些稳增长工具值得期待？政策性金融工具或"呼之欲出"。 4月政治局会议对宏观政策做出新部署，货币政策率先在5月初落地，财政政策方面，政府债发行依旧保 持积极态势，短期内增量可能来源于政策性金融工具。 货币政策上，央行于 5月7日推出三大类货币政策 措施及十项具体举措。财政政策方面，除政府债净融资维持高位外，增量资金来源需关注政治局会议提 出的 "新型政策性金融工具"。 政策性金融工具可能在6月底落地，一方面源于发改委给出的指引，另一方面也和当前经济基本面稳健有 关。 国家发展改革委副主任表示，"力争6月底前下达2025年'两重'建设和中央预算内投资全部项目清 单，同时设立新型政策性金融工具。"另外，当前经济基本面表现稳健，5月乘联会乘用车零售同比 13.0%，出口相关指标也处于较高区间。 同时，5 月份以来，多地积极筹备项目并准备申报，召开新型政策性金融工具政策 ...

Group 1: Policy Developments - President Xi Jinping and President Trump discussed the importance of US-China relations, emphasizing the need for mutual respect and cooperation in economic matters [1][2] - The introduction of the "Regulations on Government Data Sharing" aims to enhance government digital governance and service efficiency, addressing the issue of "data silos" [2][3] - The Ministry of Finance and other departments announced a unified horizontal ecological compensation mechanism focusing on the Yangtze and Yellow River basins to improve ecological protection [4][5] Group 2: Urban Development Initiatives - The Ministry of Finance announced support for 20 cities, including Beijing and Tianjin, for urban renewal projects, with a total expected subsidy exceeding 20 billion [7][8] - The initiative aims to improve urban infrastructure and promote sustainable urban development through various financing methods [8] Group 3: Human Resources and Manufacturing Integration - The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security launched a pilot program to integrate human resources services with the manufacturing sector, focusing on cities with advanced manufacturing bases [9][10] - The program aims to establish a standard system for human resources services in manufacturing and enhance regulatory measures against illegal practices [9][10]

Core Viewpoints - The improvement in consumer demand stabilizes the core CPI, but supply-side factors significantly suppress inflation readings [3][72] - The core commodity PPI shows a notable rebound primarily due to demand improvement, with tariff impacts on prices not intensifying [3][72] - The overall CPI aligns with market expectations, with food supply showing a mixed performance leading to a slight decline in food CPI [28][74] Group 1: Core CPI Characteristics - Characteristic 1: The core commodity PPI rebounded by 0.3 percentage points to -1.4% YoY, driven by sustained effects of consumption policies and a moderation in tariff impacts [3][72][8] - Characteristic 2: The core commodity CPI increased by 0.1 percentage points to 0.2% YoY, supported by consumption policies and rising gold prices, with gold jewelry prices up 40.1% YoY [19][73] - Characteristic 3: The service CPI rose by 0.2 percentage points to 0.5% YoY, aided by an increase in holiday days, which enhanced service demand [22][61] Group 2: Future Outlook - The combination of policy reinforcement and recovery in domestic demand is expected to alleviate inflationary pressures, although supply-side changes may still impose constraints on price readings [5][74] - Continued emphasis on policies to boost service consumption may further improve core service CPI, while the "old-for-new" policy could support core commodity CPI and PPI [5][74] - Despite these positive factors, low capacity utilization in downstream sectors and uncertainties regarding tariffs may still limit price recovery [5][74] Group 3: Regular Tracking - The CPI remained flat YoY, with improvements in both core commodity and core service CPI [38][74] - The PPI continued to decline, with a YoY drop of 0.6 percentage points to -3.3%, particularly in production materials [38][74] - Food CPI showed a slight decline due to mixed supply conditions, with fresh fruits and fish prices rising while seasonal vegetables saw price drops [28][74]

Core Viewpoint - The role of "export grabbing" is shifting from emerging markets to the U.S. as May exports show a decline due to the retreat of "export grabbing" and a high base effect from the previous year [3][53]. Export Analysis - May exports fell by 3.3 percentage points to 4.8% year-on-year, influenced by a high base and a decline in exports to ASEAN (-6.0 percentage points to 15.1%) and India (-9.2 percentage points to 12.7%) [3][10]. - The export growth of midstream manufacturing remains high but shows a marginal decline, with energy resource exports dropping significantly, from 7.4% and 1.3% in April to 6.3% and -3.5% in May, respectively [3][17]. - There are emerging signs of "export grabbing" towards the U.S., with May exports to the U.S. declining by 13.5 percentage points to -34.4%, but certain categories like toys (+5.4 percentage points to -1.1%) and clothing (+3.7 percentage points to 2.5%) show recovery [4][19]. Future Outlook - In June, the focus is expected to shift from emerging markets to the U.S. for "export grabbing," with overall export growth likely to receive some support [4][29]. - Three indicators suggest continued "export grabbing": positive year-on-year growth in processing trade imports in May, a surge in container bookings from the U.S. in late May, and a seasonal price increase in Yiwu small commodities [4][29]. Import Analysis - May imports fell by 3.4% year-on-year, primarily due to a decline in bulk commodity imports, with copper (-18.6% to 5.8%), crude oil (-8.2% to -0.8%), and iron ore (-5.1% to -3.8%) all showing decreases [6][56]. - The import growth of electromechanical products saw a slight increase (+0.1 percentage points to 5.5%), while bulk commodity imports declined significantly [6][44]. Sector-Specific Trends - In consumer goods, the export growth of consumer electronics increased (+1.5 percentage points to 3.8%), while light industrial products and real estate chain goods saw declines [5][55]. - Capital goods and intermediate goods exports showed divergence, with ship exports rising (+7.6 percentage points to 43.7%) while general machinery exports fell (-11.4 percentage points to 5.6%) [5][35]. - Exports to major economies showed a general decline, with exports to the U.S. down (-13.5 percentage points to -34.4%) while exports to the UK increased (+13.1 percentage points to 15.8%) [5][40].

Group 1 - The economic transformation has entered a "new stage" since 2022, characterized by a downward trend in the contribution of traditional sectors like real estate to the economy, leading to a divergence in economic indicators and a "two extremes" situation in industries [2][8][25] - The pressure in this new stage is increasingly focused on terminal demand, resulting in a weaker CPI while PPI remains under pressure, with overcapacity shifting towards downstream sectors [2][14] - The traditional policy framework's effectiveness is declining, necessitating a comprehensive "policy innovation" to adapt to the new economic landscape, which began in late September 2024 [2][36] Group 2 - The external shocks, particularly during the tariff phases, have accelerated domestic industrial upgrades, with significant shifts observed in industries like automotive and electronics [3][66] - During the Tariff 1.0 phase, industries transitioned from "import assembly" to self-sufficiency in core components, leading to a decrease in low-value-added exports and an increase in high-value-added exports [3][66][77] - Tariff 2.0 has primarily impacted low-value-added consumer goods, while high-value-added sectors have shown resilience, indicating that the tariff impacts align with the direction of industrial transformation [3][99][107] Group 3 - The new policy framework emphasizes high-quality development, focusing on high-level openness, "dual circulation," and sustainable growth, with a shift from investment-driven to people-centered approaches [4][122] - The "anti-involution" initiative is seen as a structural reform on the supply side, gaining increasing attention from both government and industry since late 2024 [4][36] - The service sector is identified as a critical area for absorbing structural employment pressures during the transformation process, with significant support needed to address supply shortages [5][54]

Group 1: Key Insights - The article discusses the phenomenon of "disappearing inventory" in the U.S. economy, highlighting that despite significant imports, inventory accumulation has not been substantial [4][5][17] - It raises questions about the sustainability of the U.S. strategy of "importing heavily" and its implications for future economic performance [5][17] - The article also addresses the challenges faced by the unemployment insurance system in China, suggesting improvements to better support unemployed individuals [6][8] Group 2: Economic Indicators - The May PMI data indicates a deepening divergence between domestic and international economic conditions, with improvements noted in domestic demand sectors such as consumer goods and equipment manufacturing [8][16] - The article mentions that the new export index for May was relatively low, reflecting ongoing challenges in international trade [8] - It highlights the legal challenges faced by Trump's tariffs, which could impact trade dynamics and economic policies [12][22] Group 3: Policy Developments - The article outlines China's commitment to high-quality cooperation in the Belt and Road Initiative, emphasizing infrastructure, market rules, and payment systems [15] - It details recent diplomatic engagements by Chinese Premier Li Qiang with ASEAN and Gulf Cooperation Council countries to enhance economic integration and cooperation [15] - The article notes the introduction of a five-year multiple-entry visa for eligible business personnel from ASEAN countries to facilitate trade and investment [15]

Group 1: High-Quality Belt and Road Initiative - The Chinese government aims to discuss a high-quality action plan for the Belt and Road Initiative with ASEAN and GCC countries, focusing on infrastructure, market rules, and payment systems [2][4]. Group 2: Anti-Monopoly and Fair Competition - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee emphasizes the need to enhance fair competition governance and address new challenges in the market [4][5]. Group 3: Modern Enterprise System - The Central Committee and State Council released opinions to improve the modern enterprise system in China, focusing on income distribution, management compensation, and corporate governance [8][9]. Group 4: Marketization of Resource and Environmental Factors - The government issued opinions to establish a market-oriented system for carbon emissions and water rights, aiming for a more active trading market by 2027 [11][12]. Group 5: Employment Public Service Model - The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and other departments proposed a precise employment public service model to enhance job-seeking support and streamline employment services [14][15]. Group 6: Smart Supply Chain Development - Eight departments, including the Ministry of Commerce, released a plan to accelerate the development of smart supply chains across key sectors, aiming to reduce logistics costs and enhance supply chain integration [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of China's unemployment insurance system and how it can be improved to better support unemployed individuals through a closed-loop system of "ensuring livelihood, promoting training, and assisting employment" [1] Group 1: Current State of Unemployment Insurance System - The unemployment insurance fund primarily consists of insurance premiums and plays a significant role in counter-cyclical adjustment, with expenditures increasing by 22.4% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2024 [2][9] - The fund's income is mainly derived from unemployment insurance premiums, with 89.5% of income from 2018 to 2023 coming from employer and employee contributions [2][18] - Expenditures focus on basic living guarantees for unemployed individuals, such as unemployment benefits and medical insurance fee payments, which accounted for 32% and 8% of total expenditures from 2018 to 2023, respectively [2][24] Group 2: Challenges Faced by the Unemployment Insurance System - The coverage rate of unemployment insurance in China exceeded 50% in 2023, but the coverage for key groups such as migrant workers remains significantly low, with only 19% of new flexible employment positions covered by social insurance [4][33] - The beneficiary rate of unemployment insurance has been below 5% overall, with only 3% in 2023, indicating that less than 15% of the unemployed population benefits from the insurance [4][39] - Some regions face significant pressure on the balance of unemployment insurance funds, with 9 regions having a sustainability period of less than 24 months in 2023 [5][48] Group 3: International Experience in Unemployment Insurance Policies - International unemployment insurance systems can be categorized into four types: mandatory unemployment insurance, non-mandatory unemployment insurance, unemployment relief, and dual unemployment insurance systems [6][74] - Germany's dual unemployment insurance mechanism combines unemployment insurance and unemployment relief, covering over 90% of the workforce, while Japan also has a dual system with substantial fiscal support for unemployment policies [7][65] - The U.S. system features a federal-state dual structure with flexible tax rates based on employers' historical layoff records, incentivizing job stability [7][71] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To enhance the effectiveness of the unemployment insurance system, it is recommended to expand coverage, especially for new employment forms, and to improve the beneficiary rate by optimizing application conditions [7][75] - Implementing a model of "experience-rated" premiums could allow for localized adjustments, increasing policy flexibility [7][75] - Gradually establishing a dual system of "basic insurance + unemployment relief" could provide better financial support for long-term unemployed individuals [7][75]