Investment Rating - The report initiates coverage with a rating of "Buy" for the company [1]. Core Insights - The company has significant supply chain and operational advantages, with ample growth potential [2]. - The projected revenue for 2025-2027 is estimated at 112.79 billion, 132.31 billion, and 155.86 billion RMB, with growth rates of 28%, 17%, and 18% respectively [10][15]. - The adjusted net profit for the same period is expected to be 21.63 billion, 25.31 billion, and 29.96 billion RMB, with growth rates of 40%, 17%, and 18% respectively [10][15]. Financial Summary - Total revenue is projected to grow from 7,676 million RMB in 2023 to 15,586 million RMB by 2027, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 38.1% in 2023, followed by 14.5%, 28.3%, 17.3%, and 17.8% in subsequent years [5][10]. - Gross profit is expected to increase from 2,403 million RMB in 2023 to 4,909 million RMB in 2027 [5]. - The adjusted net profit is forecasted to rise from 1,459 million RMB in 2023 to 2,996 million RMB in 2027, with a notable increase of 85% in 2024 [5][10]. Market Position and Strategy - The company is positioned as a leading player in the domestic ready-to-drink tea market, focusing on high-quality, short-shelf-life ingredients [22]. - The business model emphasizes a high-density store network supported by self-built cold chain logistics, allowing for cost-effective delivery of fresh ingredients [10][22]. - The company plans to expand its store count significantly, with projections of opening 2,500, 3,000, and 3,500 new stores from 2025 to 2027, respectively [17]. Valuation - The report assigns a target price of 29.66 HKD based on a projected PE ratio of 30x for 2025, which is above the industry average [20]. - The current market capitalization is approximately 57,790 million HKD [7]. Management and Governance - The management team is experienced, with a strong focus on operational efficiency and franchisee support [29][32]. - The company has a concentrated ownership structure, with the founding team holding over 70% of the shares, ensuring alignment of interests [29][30]. Growth Potential - The ready-to-drink beverage market in China has substantial growth potential, particularly in lower-tier cities, which are expected to be the main source of growth [10][22]. - The company is leveraging digital operations and a robust supply chain to enhance its competitive edge [10][22].

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Accumulate" rating for the industry [4] Core Insights - The 2025 World Robot Conference will be held from August 8 to 12 in Beijing, showcasing over 1,500 exhibits, including more than 100 new product launches from over 200 domestic and international robot companies [6][8] - The core advantage of humanoid robots lies in their fine operation capabilities in general scenarios, which is expected to be a key focus for future commercialization [6][8] - Significant breakthroughs in mobility and dexterity have been achieved in humanoid robots, which are anticipated to play important roles in domestic services, manufacturing, and logistics [8] Summary by Sections Event Overview - The 2025 World Robot Conference will feature 50 humanoid robot manufacturers presenting the latest exhibits and industry solutions, marking the highest participation in similar events [8] Market Potential - The report highlights that in 2024, China accounted for two-thirds of global robot patent applications, indicating a strong innovation landscape [8] - The humanoid robots are expected to leverage advanced capabilities such as grasp control, dynamic vision, object recognition, force feedback, and task planning, facilitated by high-performance embodied intelligent models [8] Recommended Stocks - The report recommends the following stocks: - Fengcai Technology (688279.SH) with a closing price of 188.33 and a PE ratio of 52.90 for 2025E - Orbbec (688322.SH) with a closing price of 73.79 and a PE ratio of 368.95 for 2025E - Rockchip (603893.SH) with a closing price of 162.96 and a PE ratio of 59.69 for 2025E [9]

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: Value Smart Beta Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The Value Smart Beta portfolios are constructed based on the goal of achieving high beta elasticity and long-term stable excess returns. The portfolios are designed to capture the value style with low historical correlation to other styles[7] **Model Construction Process**: Two portfolios are constructed under the value style: the "Value 50 Portfolio" and the "Value Balanced 50 Portfolio". These portfolios are selected and weighted to optimize for the value factor while maintaining diversification and minimizing correlation with other factors[7] **Model Evaluation**: The Value Smart Beta portfolios demonstrate a focus on capturing value-oriented excess returns, but their performance is sensitive to market conditions[7] - **Model Name**: Growth Smart Beta Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The Growth Smart Beta portfolios aim to capture the growth style with high beta elasticity and long-term stable excess returns. These portfolios are designed to have low historical correlation with other styles[7] **Model Construction Process**: Two portfolios are constructed under the growth style: the "Growth 50 Portfolio" and the "Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio". The portfolios are optimized to emphasize growth characteristics while maintaining diversification[7] **Model Evaluation**: The Growth Smart Beta portfolios are effective in capturing growth-oriented returns but may underperform in value-dominated market conditions[7] - **Model Name**: Small-Cap Smart Beta Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The Small-Cap Smart Beta portfolios are designed to capture the small-cap style with high beta elasticity and long-term stable excess returns. These portfolios are constructed to have low historical correlation with other styles[7] **Model Construction Process**: Two portfolios are constructed under the small-cap style: the "Small-Cap 50 Portfolio" and the "Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio". The portfolios are optimized to emphasize small-cap characteristics while maintaining diversification[7] **Model Evaluation**: The Small-Cap Smart Beta portfolios show strong performance in capturing small-cap excess returns, particularly in favorable market environments[7] --- Model Backtesting Results - **Value 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: -2.12% - Weekly Excess Return: -0.41% - Monthly Absolute Return: 0.20% - Monthly Excess Return: 0.33% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 12.44% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 8.78% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 2.35%[8] - **Value Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: -0.46% - Weekly Excess Return: 1.26% - Monthly Absolute Return: 0.48% - Monthly Excess Return: 0.61% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 10.16% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 6.50% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 3.99%[8] - **Growth 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: -1.48% - Weekly Excess Return: 0.68% - Monthly Absolute Return: -0.71% - Monthly Excess Return: -0.31% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 4.50% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 2.38% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 3.61%[8] - **Growth Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: -1.64% - Weekly Excess Return: 0.53% - Monthly Absolute Return: 0.06% - Monthly Excess Return: 0.46% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 8.71% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 6.59% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 6.11%[8] - **Small-Cap 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: 1.25% - Weekly Excess Return: 1.43% - Monthly Absolute Return: 1.07% - Monthly Excess Return: 0.85% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 36.52% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 19.90% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 6.23%[8] - **Small-Cap Balanced 50 Portfolio**: - Weekly Absolute Return: -1.09% - Weekly Excess Return: -0.90% - Monthly Absolute Return: 0.61% - Monthly Excess Return: 0.39% - Year-to-Date Absolute Return: 26.60% - Year-to-Date Excess Return: 9.98% - Maximum Relative Drawdown: 4.56%[8]

AI Industry Trends - ByteDance has open-sourced its AI Agent "Coze," which supports commercial use and has over 6,000 stars on GitHub, providing a platform for developing intelligent agents without coding[14] - The "Step 3" model by Jieyue features 321 billion total parameters and 38 billion activated parameters, achieving a 300% inference efficiency compared to DeepSeek-R1, with expected revenue of nearly $1 billion in 2025[11] - Ant Group released the financial reasoning model "Agentar-Fin-R1," which outperforms similar models in multiple financial evaluations and is based on a comprehensive financial dataset[16] AI Applications and Platforms - SenseTime launched the "Wuneng" embodied intelligence platform, featuring a multimodal reasoning model that improves cross-modal reasoning accuracy by 5 times compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro[8] - Huawei introduced the AI-Box platform, designed for lightweight edge deployment, supporting local execution of multimodal large models with low power consumption[9] - Tencent's Tairos platform offers modular services for multimodal perception and planning, focusing on enhancing robotic software capabilities[10] AI Model Developments - Zhiyuan released the GLM-4.5 model, which integrates reasoning, programming, and agent capabilities, achieving top performance in global open-source model benchmarks[17] - JD Cloud announced the open-source enterprise-level intelligent agent "JoyAgent," which supports multi-agent collaboration and has been tested in over 20,000 internal applications[18] - ByteDance and Nanjing University developed the CriticLean framework, improving the accuracy of mathematical formalization from 38% to 84%[19] Market Risks - AI software sales are below expectations, leading to adjustments in capital expenditure plans and slower iteration speeds for core AI products[34]

Market Performance - Global markets experienced a general decline, with MSCI Global down by 2.2%, MSCI Developed down by 2.3%, and MSCI Emerging down by 1.6% [8][15][17] - Among developed markets, the Australian S&P 200 showed the best performance with a decline of only 0.1%, while the French CAC40 was the weakest, down by 3.7% [8][15] - In the emerging markets, the Taiwan Weighted Index was the best performer, up by 0.3%, while the Hang Seng Index was the worst, down by 3.5% [8][15] Trading Sentiment - Trading volume increased across major indices, with the Hang Seng Index reaching 198 billion shares and a turnover of 736.1 billion USD, while the S&P 500 had a turnover of 58.6 billion USD [24] - Investor sentiment in the Hong Kong market improved, with short-selling accounting for 13.5% of total turnover, while North American sentiment showed a decline [24][29] - Volatility increased in the US markets, while it decreased in the Hong Kong market [24][30] Fund Flows - Global macro liquidity expectations turned more accommodative, with the market anticipating 2.4 rate cuts by the Federal Reserve within the year [53][56] - Significant capital inflows were observed in the Hong Kong market, with a total of 18.3 billion HKD flowing in during the last week [61][65] - The net inflow of funds into the Hong Kong market was primarily driven by stable foreign capital, amounting to 13.8 billion HKD [61] Earnings Expectations - The earnings expectations for the Hang Seng Index were revised down from 2195 to 2191 for 2025, with the financial sector seeing the largest upward revision [66][68] - The S&P 500's earnings expectations were adjusted upward from 265 to 267, with the technology sector experiencing the most significant increase [66][68] - The Eurozone STOXX50 index saw a slight downward revision in earnings expectations from 336 to 335 for 2025 [66][68]

稳固优化：中国权益仍具备上行动能 [Table_Authors] 王子翌(分析师) 战术性资产配置周度点评（20250803） 本报告导读： 我们维持此前的战术性大类资产配置观点。我们建议战术性超配 A 股、美股，战术 性标配人民币，战术性低配原油。 投资要点： 策略研究 /[Table_Date] 2025.08.04 | | 021-38038293 | | --- | --- | | | wangziyi@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880523050004 | | | 方奕(分析师) | | | 021-38031658 | | | fangyi2@gtht.com | | 登记编号 | S0880520120005 | [Table_Report] 相关报告 既是中国经济"转型牛"，也是中国资本市场"改 革牛" 2025.08.03 成交活跃度上升，万得全 A 估值领涨 2025.07.28 势如破竹：风险偏好改善主导资产定价 2025.07.27 甘霖终降：基建发力提振市场风险偏好 2025.07.22 成交活跃度上升，小盘估值领涨 2025.07.21 策 略 研 究 略 周 报 ...

Macroeconomic Insights - The US GDP growth rate for Q2 2025 increased significantly to 3% due to a rebound in personal consumption income and expenditure, with disposable income rising by 4.3% year-on-year and expenditure by 4.75%[8] - The core PCE price index showed a year-on-year increase of 2.79% in June, indicating persistent inflationary pressures[8] - The US non-farm payrolls added only 73,000 jobs in July, with significant downward revisions to previous months' data, raising concerns about the labor market's strength[23] Market Trends - Major global stock indices experienced declines, with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.9%, Nikkei 225 down 1.6%, S&P 500 down 2.4%, and Hang Seng Index down 3.5%[7] - Commodity prices showed mixed results, with IPE Brent crude oil futures up 1.7% and COMEX copper down 20.2% due to policy impacts[7] - The dollar index rose by 1% over the week, reflecting a recovery after a rapid decline[7] Investment Strategies - The report emphasizes a focus on long-term investment opportunities in low-inflation environments, particularly in bond assets and high-dividend equities[20] - The ongoing transformation of the Chinese economy is expected to create new investment opportunities, especially in technology and new consumption sectors[42] - The report suggests that the decline in risk-free rates, with long-term government bond yields falling below 2%, will further enhance the attractiveness of equities over fixed-income products[44]

Core Insights - The report indicates a decline in trading activity, with the CSI 300 index experiencing the largest drop in valuation [1] - Overall valuations have decreased across indices, with the CSI 300 leading the decline [1][4] - Consumer services have shown resilience in PE valuation, while banks have led in PB valuation [4][5] Index Valuation - The CSI 300 index has seen a PE-TTM historical percentile drop of 6.5 percentage points, while the PB-LF historical percentile has decreased by 7.5 percentage points [4][5] - All major indices have experienced a comprehensive decline in valuations, with the CSI 300 index leading the downturn [4][5] Industry Valuation - In terms of PE valuation, consumer services have increased by 1.0 percentage point, while banks have led in PB valuation with a 0.5 percentage point increase [4][5] - The automotive sector is noted for its cost-effectiveness in the PE-G comparison [4] Market Sentiment - Trading activity has decreased, with turnover rates and transaction volumes declining across most indices, except for the ChiNext index, which saw an increase of 2.3% in turnover rate and 8.2% in transaction volume [4][5] - The margin trading balance has risen to 1.98 trillion yuan, reflecting a 2.30% increase [4][5] Risk Premium - The equity risk premium (ERP) for the entire A-share market has slightly increased to 4.71%, up by 0.12 percentage points from the previous week [4][5]

Group 1: Strategy Overview - The report emphasizes that the Chinese economy is undergoing a transformation, leading to a "transformation bull market" in the stock market, with expectations for new highs in the future [1][15][16] - Key investment themes include a focus on financials, growth sectors, and certain cyclical industries, as the market adjusts and gains confidence [1][2][3] Group 2: Key Investment Recommendations - The August stock selection includes: 1. Banking: China Merchants Bank 2. Non-bank: CICC and New China Life Insurance 3. Overseas Technology: Tencent Holdings and Kuaishou-W 4. Electronics: Cambricon Technologies, Chipone Technology, and Suzhou Tianmai 5. Computing: Dingjie Smart and Anheng Information 6. Machinery: Hengli Hydraulic and Mingzhi Electric 7. Military: AVIC Shenfei 8. Coal: Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry 9. Light Industry: Sun Paper 10. Agriculture: Muyuan Foods 11. Transportation: SF Express 12. Pharmaceuticals: MicroPort Medical 13. Real Estate: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle 14. Utilities: Huadian International Power [1][4][12] Group 3: Banking Sector Insights - The banking sector is expected to face revenue pressure but maintain positive net profit growth, with a gradual recovery in net interest margins anticipated [22][23] - China Merchants Bank is projected to benefit from economic recovery, with an upward revision of net profit growth forecasts for 2025-2027 [25][26][27] Group 4: Non-Banking Sector Insights - The impact of the new tax on bond interest income is expected to be limited for the non-banking sector, with continued optimism for growth in this area [30][32] - CICC is forecasted to see significant profit growth driven by active trading and investment recovery, with an increase in EPS estimates for 2025-2027 [33][34] Group 5: Technology Sector Insights - Major tech companies are increasing capital expenditures significantly, particularly in AI, indicating a robust growth trajectory for the sector [43][45] - Tencent is expected to leverage AI to enhance its core business, with revenue and profit projections being adjusted upwards for 2025-2027 [45][46][47]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The implementation of the new policy of resuming VAT on the interest income of newly issued bonds after August 8, 2025, will have a significant impact on the spot bond market and will also be transmitted to the pricing logic and trading strategies of Treasury bond futures. The key to whether there will be inter - period gaming opportunities or short - squeezing phenomena in Treasury bond futures lies in whether the CTD bond (cheapest to deliver bond) switches. The T contract may be a special case in the subsequent CTD bond changes, and there may be inter - period arbitrage opportunities and short - squeezing [1][6]. 3. Summary According to the Directory 3.1 Whether the Cancellation of Tax Exemption on Treasury Bonds Will Lead to CTD Bond Switching: The T Contract Is a Special Case - Generally, new bonds are difficult to replace old bonds as CTD bonds. New bonds with longer durations need to be fully discounted, which is difficult to achieve in practice. However, the 7 - year new bond in the T contract's deliverable bonds has a relatively short duration and only needs a small discount to become the CTD bond [11][12]. - There are two common empirical rules for identifying CTD bonds: when the spot bond yield is higher than the coupon rate (3%) of the Treasury bond futures virtual bond, high - duration bonds tend to be CTD bonds; when it is lower, low - duration bonds tend to be CTD bonds. For bonds with similar durations, the one with a higher yield to maturity is more likely to be the CTD bond [11]. - For TS, TF, and TL contracts, the newly issued bonds are generally of longer duration among the deliverable bonds, so they need to be significantly discounted to replace old bonds as CTD bonds. For the T contract, the 7 - year new bond only needs to have an issue rate about 3 - 6bp higher than the active bond to become the CTD bond for the 2512 or 2603 contracts, while the 10 - year new bond needs an issue rate about 30bp higher [14][17][18]. 3.2 How Will the Inter - period Change After the Cancellation of Tax Exemption: Focus on Contracts with CTD Bond Switching - The key to whether there are inter - period arbitrage opportunities after the cancellation of tax exemption on Treasury bonds lies in whether the CTD bonds of near - and far - month contracts switch. If the CTD bonds switch, considering the tax - exemption effect, the contract with the old bond as the CTD bond may be stronger than the one with the new bond, and inter - period arbitrage can be carried out [19]. - Contracts where CTD bonds are more likely to switch are TS2603, T2603, and T2512. With the new issuance of 2 - year and 7 - year Treasury bonds on September 12, there may be opportunities to focus on the inter - period spreads of TS2512 - TS2603 and T2512 - T2603 [7][20]. 3.3 Will There Be a "Short - Squeezing" in Treasury Bond Futures After the Cancellation of Tax Exemption on Treasury Bonds? - The possibility of short - squeezing in Treasury bond futures contracts with old bonds as CTD bonds is relatively small. The large stock of old bonds and subsequent issuances ensure sufficient supply, and excessive chasing will reduce their cost - effectiveness, thus suppressing the buying sentiment [23][25]. - Contracts where CTD bonds may switch to new bonds may face short - squeezing pressure. New bonds have low supply and circulation at the initial issuance stage, and the market lacks experience in dealing with new bonds as CTD bonds. The T contract and TS2603 contract are more likely to have CTD bond switches, and the T contract may face more severe short - squeezing pressure due to its large delivery volume and the relatively poor liquidity of the 7 - year Treasury bond [25].