Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and reminds investors of the May 11, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action filed against the company [1] Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - The complaint alleges that Trip.com and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and failing to disclose regulatory risks associated with monopolistic business activities [1] - On January 14, 2026, Trip.com stock fell 17% after the company disclosed it is under investigation by China's market regulator for potential antitrust violations [1] Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased or acquired securities in Trip.com between April 30, 2024, and January 13, 2026, are encouraged to contact Faruqi & Faruqi to discuss their legal rights [1] - The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class, who will oversee the litigation on behalf of the class [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Trip.com Group Limited is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misrepresented regulatory risks associated with its monopolistic practices during the class period from April 30, 2024, to January 13, 2026 [1] Company Overview - Trip.com operates as a travel service provider, offering services such as accommodation reservations, transportation ticketing, packaged tours, and corporate travel management [1] Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Trip.com and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose the regulatory risks stemming from their monopolistic business activities [1] - A Bloomberg article published on January 14, 2026, reported that China is investigating Trip.com for alleged antitrust conduct, which led to a significant drop of approximately 19% in the price of Trip.com American Depositary Shares over two trading sessions [1] Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Trip.com securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1] - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm to litigate the case [1] Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1] - The firm has a strong track record, recovering a total of $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, making it one of the largest plaintiffs' firms globally [1]

Investment Rating - The report assigns a "Buy" rating to multiple companies, indicating a potential upside in their stock prices over the next 12 months [5][13]. Core Insights - The report highlights a basket of 26 stocks with an average return of -3.0%, which underperformed the MSCI China Index by 0.8 percentage points [10]. - Among the 26 stocks, 11 outperformed the benchmark, suggesting selective opportunities within the basket [10]. Summary by Relevant Sections Company Ratings - Companies such as Geely Automobile, Luckin Coffee, and Tencent are rated "Buy" with target prices indicating significant upside potential ranging from 38% to 109% [5]. - Specific target prices include: - Geely Automobile: 18.00 HKD (current price: 8.61 HKD) [5] - Luckin Coffee: 129.83 HKD (current price: 67.95 HKD) [5] - Tencent: 760.00 HKD (current price: 551.00 HKD) [5] Market Performance - The average market capitalization of the highlighted companies ranges from 1.3 billion to 641.3 billion, with varying average daily trading volumes [5]. - The report notes that the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios for FY24A and FY25E show a wide range, indicating differing growth expectations across sectors [5]. Analyst Coverage - The report includes insights from multiple analysts, indicating a collaborative approach to stock evaluation [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased securities of Trip.com Group Limited between April 30, 2024, and January 13, 2026, alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements regarding regulatory risks and business operations [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that defendants made false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant regulatory risks associated with Trip.com's monopolistic business activities [1]. - The lawsuit asserts that the misleading statements led to material misrepresentations about Trip.com's business, operations, and prospects, resulting in investor damages when the truth was revealed [1]. Group 2: Investor Participation - Investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - To participate in the class action, investors must move the Court by May 11, 2026, if they wish to serve as lead plaintiff, representing other class members in the litigation [1]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [1]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has consistently ranked in the top 4 for securities class action settlements since 2013 [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Trip.com class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding regulatory risks associated with its monopolistic practices, leading to significant financial losses for investors during the specified class period [4][5]. Company Overview - Trip.com operates as a travel service provider, offering services such as accommodation reservations, transportation ticketing, packaged tours, in-destination services, and corporate travel management [3]. Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that during the class period, Trip.com failed to disclose the regulatory risks it faced due to its monopolistic business activities [4]. - Following a Bloomberg article on January 14, 2026, which reported an antitrust investigation into Trip.com by Chinese authorities, the company's American Depositary Shares experienced a price drop of approximately 19% over two trading sessions [5]. Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, representing the interests of the class [6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone, and a total of $8.4 billion over the past five years [7].

Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has announced a class action lawsuit against Trip.com Group Limited, alleging that the company understated regulatory risks associated with its monopolistic business practices, which led to misleading statements about its operations and prospects [1][1][1] Allegations - The lawsuit claims that during the class period from April 30, 2025, to January 13, 2026, Trip.com failed to disclose significant regulatory risks due to its monopolistic activities [1][1] - On January 14, 2026, Bloomberg reported that China was investigating Trip.com for alleged antitrust conduct, which resulted in a significant drop in the company's American Depository Shares (ADS) price by $12.90, or 17.05%, closing at $62.78 [1][1] - The following day, the ADS price fell further by $1.48, or 2.35%, to close at $61.30 [1][1] Company Background - Trip.com Group Limited is positioned as a leading global one-stop travel service provider, offering a comprehensive suite of travel products and services [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Trip.com Group Limited for securities purchased between April 30, 2024, and January 13, 2026, seeking to recover damages under federal securities laws [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit is initiated by Rosen Law Firm, which specializes in investor rights [1] - The class action aims to represent investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the specified class period [1] - Investors interested in joining the class action can find more information on the Rosen Law Firm's website or contact a representative [1]

Financial Performance - Trip.com Group Limited reported a full-year net revenue of RMB62.4 billion for 2025, marking a 17% increase year-over-year [1] - For Q4, the company achieved net revenue of RMB15.4 billion, which is a 21% increase year-over-year, driven by resilient travel demand [1] - Net income for the full year rose to RMB33.4 billion, attributed to substantial investment gains [1] Revenue Drivers - Accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing were the primary revenue drivers, accounting for 42% and 36% of total annual revenue, respectively [2] - The international business of Trip.com saw significant expansion, with bookings on its international platform increasing by approximately 60% year-over-year [2] - The company served around 20 million inbound travelers in 2025 [2] Leadership Changes and Investigations - Significant leadership changes were announced, with co-founders Min Fan and Qi Ji resigning from their board positions [3] - May Yihong Wu and Iris Yang Xiao were appointed as new independent directors to maintain diverse expertise [3] - The company is cooperating with an ongoing anti-monopoly investigation by the State Administration for Market Regulation, which began in January [3] - Despite the investigation, management stated that business operations remain normal and the company is focused on its global growth strategy [3] Company Overview - Trip.com Group Limited operates as a travel service provider, offering accommodation reservations, transportation ticketing, packaged tours, in-destination services, corporate travel management, and other travel-related services both in China and internationally [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing demand for English-speaking customer service positions at Ctrip, highlighting how these roles have become attractive to recent graduates, particularly those with overseas study experience, due to competitive salaries and perceived job stability [4][6][25]. Group 1: Job Market Dynamics - Ctrip's English customer service positions are seen as a "refuge" for international students, with high competition for roles requiring strong English skills and educational backgrounds [4][6]. - The salary for Ctrip's English online customer service ranges from 11,000 to 14,000 yuan, which is higher than some entry-level positions in other tech companies [7][8]. - Many graduates prioritize salary over job satisfaction, with some choosing Ctrip over firms like PwC due to better pay [8][11]. Group 2: Work Environment and Responsibilities - The role offers a work-life balance, but employees often face pressure from KPIs and may end up working overtime voluntarily [10][11]. - Ctrip's customer service positions are distinct from traditional roles, focusing on international clients and requiring higher language proficiency, which is reflected in the job's appeal to graduates [17][18]. - The work involves handling customer complaints, managing hotel partnerships, and addressing complex issues, often requiring significant mental effort [21][22]. Group 3: Career Progression and Perception - Many view customer service roles as a stepping stone to other positions within Ctrip, although opportunities for internal transfers have become limited [26][27]. - Ctrip's customer service team is substantial, with over 16,000 employees, making it a critical part of the company's operations [27][29]. - The company emphasizes the importance of customer service in maintaining high profit margins and customer satisfaction, which has been a key factor in its success [30][31]. Group 4: Future of Customer Service - Despite advancements in AI, the demand for human customer service representatives remains strong due to the complexity of customer interactions [31][32]. - Ctrip has implemented measures to support its customer service staff, recognizing the high stress associated with the role, especially during peak seasons [32][33].

携程拿去花（类似花呗的功能）为了恶意吃客户的利息，哪怕默认还款银行卡里有钱，也会只扣款最低应还额，把剩余消费记入下个月我刚刚才发现并意识到这件事，稍微算了下，为此已多支付了应该有超过 5000 元本不应该支出的利息不知道是否我理解错了，这携程金融未免也太恶劣了 😅 https://t.co/M2iBxB7SX5 ...