在上半年债券发行放量、利率大幅波动的背景下，下半年债市的走向成为各方关注的焦点。综合多家机 构观点，下半年债市预计维持震荡格局，10年期国债收益率波动区间或维持在1.5%~1.8%之间。 市场分析人士指出，下半年债市运行将受到经济增长动能、政策协同效应、债务化解进展等多重因素的 综合影响，投资者需在复杂多变的市场环境中寻找结构性机遇。 规模扩容与利率波动交织 规模扩容与利率波动交织，成为2025年上半年债券市场的显著特征。 Wind数据显示，上半年债市总发行量达27.29万亿元，同比增幅接近24%。其中，利率债作为绝对主 力，发行量达16.9万亿元，占比近四成。在利率债中，国债发行7.89万亿元，地方债发行5.49万亿元， 共同构成了核心驱动力。 三季度在资金面宽松延续、央行流动性管理预期以及潜在降息空间的共同支撑下，做多胜率相对较高。 2025年上半年，债券市场在规模扩容与利率波动的交织影响下，呈现出复杂多变的格局。 Wind数据显示，上半年债市总发行量突破27万亿元，其中利率债占比近四成。与此同时，债市利率剧 烈波动，10年期国债收益率在一季度上行30个基点后，于二季度又快速下行，形成"倒V"形走势。 伴 ...

机构认为，利率债收益率上行，应该和短期资金利率似到阶段底部有关。随着月中税期走款、MLF （中期借贷便利）回笼、政府债缴款，资金面波动可能加大，需要关注央行投放情况。 【行情跟踪】 国债期货收盘全线下跌，30年期主力合约跌0.22%报120.920，10年期主力合约跌0.08%报109.020，5年 期主力合约跌0.08%报106.135，2年期主力合约跌0.03%报102.466。 新华财经北京7月8日电（王菁）债市周二（7月8日）延续偏弱，因短期资金利率下行乏力、A股走强共 同施压，银行间主要利率债收益率普遍小幅上行，国债期货主力全线收跌；公开市场单日净回笼620亿 元，资金利率多数保持回落。 银行间主要利率债收益率纷纷上行，截至发稿，30年期国债"25超长特别国债02"收益率上行0.55BP报 1.8605%，10年期国开债"25国开10"收益率上行0.55BP报1.7220%，10年期国债"25附息国债11"收益率上 行0.3BP报1.6430%，2年期国债"25附息国债06"收益率上行1BP报1.3625%。 中证转债指数收盘上涨0.77%，报450.01点，成交金额752.27亿元。景23转债、双 ...

上海银行间同业拆放利率（Shibor）延续窄幅波动。具体来看，隔夜Shibor与前日持平，报1.3120%；7天Shibor下跌0.30BP，报1.4550%；14天Shibor上涨 0.60BP，报1.5000%。 | | | | 2025-07-08 11:00 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 期限 | Shibor(%) | 涨跌(BP) | | 价 | O/N | 1.3120 | 0.00 | | 中 | 1W | 1.4550 | 0.30 | | � | 2W | 1.5000 | 0.60 | | � | 1M | 1.5460 | 1.10 | | 中 | 3M | 1.5700 | 0.90 | | ゃ | 6M | 1.5970 | 0.30 | | 价 | 9M | 1.6090 | 0.30 | | 价 | 1Y | 1.6120 | 0.40 | 新华财经北京7月8日电（刘润榕）人民银行8日开展690亿元7天期逆回购操作，操作利率持平1.40%；鉴于当日有1310亿元7天期逆回购到期，公开市场实 现净回笼620元。 上海银行间同业拆放利率（7月8日） ...

关注央行态度。 他进一步指出，OMO逆回购操作具有"工具模式"和"非工具模式"。在"非工具模式"下，货币当局舍弃对 于OMO规模的主动调节，OMO规模不再是中央银行调节流动性的手段，而是由各一级交易商根据政策 利率、自身流动性的需求、对市场的判断决定。市场竞争的作用使得最终形成的DR007中枢会略微高于 7天期 OMO利率，此外实践中DR001的中枢略低于7天期OMO利率。 跨季后央行加大回笼力度，但资金利率利率中枢持续下行。存单方面，银行"钱紧"明显缓解，平稳度过 6月的4.2万亿元到期高峰后，一年期AAA同业存单收益率下破1.6%。 在此背景下，市场上关于未来资金面的乐观情绪升温，对存单价格会否继续下行的关注度增加。不少机 构认为，这一方面基于财政支出加速、跨季后信贷冲量结束，另一方面与理财、货基对存单需求放量支 撑有关。 不过，随着银行同业存单备案额度使用加快，关于下半年银行负债压力及存单提额的担忧也有所增加。 7月8日，一年期AAA同业存单利率仍在1.6%附近，但个别大行一级发行已较上周有小幅抬价趋势。多 位受访人士表示，短期看，下半年同业存单提额压力有限，利率会否进一步下行仍取决于央行态度和市 场操 ...

投资咨询业务资格:证监详可【2012】31号 宏观金融数据日报 | | 国贸期货研究院 宏观金融研究中心 郑雨婷 | | 期货执业证号:F3074875; 投资咨询证号: Z0017779 | | | 2025/7/8 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 品种 | 收盘价 | 较前值变动(bp) | 品种 | 收盘价 | 较前值变动 (bp) | | | DROO1 | 1.31 | 0.05 | DR007 | 1.47 | 4.37 | | हूं | GC001 | 1.49 | 5.50 | GC007 | 1.51 | 2.00 | | E | SHBOR 3M | 1.58 | -1.80 | LPR 5年 | 3.50 | 0.00 | | 市 | 1年期国债 | 1.34 | 0.40 | 5年期国债 | 1.47 | 0.15 | | 场 | 10年期国债 | 1.64 | -0.10 | 10年期美债 | 4.35 | 5.00 | | 与 | DAID | 回顾:央行昨日开展了1065亿元7天期逆回购操作, 中山斗笛 出口名 ...

市场回顾与分析 一级市场回顾 上周一级市场国债、地方债和政策性金融债发行规模分别为2801亿、721亿和1610亿，净融资额为1999 亿、216亿和1550亿。非金信用债共计发行规模2082亿，净融资额843亿。可转债新券发行1只，预计融 资规模7亿元。 二级市场回顾 上周利率有所下行。主要影响因素包括：资金利率创年内新低、理财资金回表、国债发行缩量、股债跷 跷板等。 流动性跟踪 OMO净回笼1.4万亿，但财政支出补充流动性，季初资金明显转松，匿名资金跌至1.3%，1年国股存单 跌破1.6%。 政策与基本面 中央财经委员会提及依法依规治理企业低价无序竞争。6月中采制造业PMI录得49.7，高于预期与前 值。 受银行板块强势，反内卷、创新药利好等产业消息影响，上周A股多数宽基指数收涨，钢铁、医药和银 行等板块领涨。具体而言，万得全A上涨1.22%，沪深300收涨1.54%，创业板大涨1.50%。A股成交缩 量，日均成交额1.44万亿，周度日均成交量减少1302.12 亿。截至2025年7月3日，全A融资余额18， 463.82 亿，较6月26日增加198.47 亿，融资余额连续9个交易日净增长。 债市策略展望 ...

兴业期货日度策略：2025.07.07 重点策略推荐及操作建议： 商品期货方面：驱动分化，焦煤偏强，碳酸锂、PTA 偏弱。 联系电话：021-80220262 操作上： 品种基本面分析及行情研判： | 品种 | 观点及操作建议 | 方向研判 | 分析师 | 联系人 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 股指 | 震荡蓄势，关注中报业绩表现 随着股指上行至年内高位，资金表现逐渐谨慎，市场量能小幅 | 震荡 | 投资咨询部 张舒绮 | 联系人：房紫薇 | | | 上周 A 股震荡走强，上证指数再创新高，沪深两市成交额在 | | | | | | 1.4 万亿元左右，较前一周小幅回落。从行业来看，钢铁、银行、 | | | | | | 建材板块领涨，综合金融、计算机行业跌幅居前。四大股指期货走 | | | | | | 势分化，IF、IH 走强；IC、IM 高位震荡，基差贴水小幅走阔。 | | | | | | | | 从业资格： | 021-80220135 | | | | | F3037345 | 从业资格： | | | 走弱，短期或维持高位震荡蓄势。中长期来看，政策托底态度依旧 | ...

市场中每次都有新鲜的故事让你防不胜防，让你琢磨不透。同样一类故事，结果还有可能是不一样的。 所以，想通过总结各类影响因素或事件来预测未来是行不通的。 ——笔记哥《应对》 【笔记20250707— 债农暗地狂卷，债市暗流涌动（-股市微涨+特朗普威胁对金砖国家加征新关税+资金 面均衡宽松=涨跌互现)】 资金面均衡宽松，长债收益率涨跌不一。 央行公开市场开展1065亿元7天期逆回购操作，今日有3315亿元逆回购到期，净回笼2250亿元。 资金面均衡宽松，资金利率平稳，DR001在1.31%附近，DR007在1.47%附近。 -------------------------- 今天的债市，如果只看10Y国债和10Y国开活跃券，那只能说是"一潭死水"（合计成交笔数不足1200 笔，振幅均不足半个BP），但债农暗地狂卷，债市"暗流涌动"：尾盘公布下周一30Y国债发行增量、 20Y国债缩量，于是30Y"怒上"0.35BP、20Y"大下"1.35BP。 昨晚传出"深圳全面解除限购、取消增值税"的小作文，今日利率和商品均未理会，但至少地产股还是挺 捧场。对比之下，特朗普一会儿签署贸易信函、一会儿威胁新加关税，但全球市场抱团交 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Views of the Report - The potential negative factors for the current bond market come from the fundamentals, including economic data disclosure and the progress of Sino-US negotiations. Under the consensus expectation, it is difficult to say that the bond market will reverse. Attention should be paid to the changes in bond market expectations caused by event shocks [2]. - The sentiment index of fixed-income sellers has reached a new high this year, while buyers mainly expect the market to fluctuate, and their sentiment has declined for three consecutive weeks [2]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Seller and Buyer Markets 1.1 Seller Market Sentiment Index and Interest Rate Bonds - This week, the weighted tracking index was 0.47, showing a mostly bullish view but lower than last week. The unweighted tracking index was 0.68, up 0.09 from last week. Currently, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 18 bullish, 6 neutral, and 1 bearish [10]. - 72% of institutions are bullish, with keywords such as weak credit, slow economic recovery, external demand shocks, loose monetary policy, low supply pressure in July, and opportunities for a bullish flattening of the curve after the short end declines [4][10]. - 24% of institutions are neutral, with keywords such as the neutral impact of restarting treasury bonds, and potential disturbances from the stock-bond seesaw and unexpected Sino-US negotiations [4][10]. - 4% of institutions are bearish, with the view that the central bank's bond purchases are not the reason for the decline in interest rates, and the economic recovery in the second half of 2025 is expected to drive up prices and interest rates [4][10]. 1.2 Buyer Market Sentiment Index and Interest Rate Bonds - This week, the tracking sentiment index was 0.13, showing a mostly neutral view and lower than last week. Currently, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 5 bullish and 18 neutral [11]. - 22% of institutions are bullish, with keywords such as loose funds and a possible quarter-on-quarter weakening of the economic fundamentals in the third quarter [11]. - 78% of institutions are neutral, with keywords such as the reduced expectation of broad credit after the second-quarter monetary policy meeting and the suppression of bond market sentiment by the equity market [11]. 1.3 Credit Bonds - Market hot topics include the recovery of wealth management scale and loose funds. The recovery of wealth management scale may further improve the demand for credit bonds, and loose funds, combined with weak fundamentals, support the overall strength of the bond market and a decline in benchmark interest rates [17]. 1.4 Convertible Bonds - This week, institutions generally hold a neutral-to-bullish view, with 8 bullish and 6 neutral [18]. - 57% of institutions are bullish, believing that with the new bond supply not accelerating significantly on the issuance side, the convertible bond market scale may gradually shrink in the second half of the year, and medium and large-cap convertible bonds among high-quality existing and newly issued bonds are worth attention [18]. - 43% of institutions are neutral, stating that there is still uncertainty about the US tariff increase, and the allocation value of convertible bonds will be better reflected after the valuation is moderately digested [18]. 2. Treasury Bond Futures Tracking 2.1 Futures Trading - Futures prices showed mixed trends. As of July 4, the prices of TS/TF/T/TL treasury bond contracts were 102.51 yuan, 106.26 yuan, 109.10 yuan, and 121.20 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.03 yuan, -0.01 yuan, +0.05 yuan, and +0.31 yuan compared to last Friday [21]. - The trading volume of treasury bond futures generally increased. As of July 4, from a 5MA perspective, the trading volumes of TS/TF/T/TL futures contracts were 640 billion yuan, 622 billion yuan, 766 billion yuan, and 988 billion yuan respectively, with changes of +3.04 billion yuan, +30.63 billion yuan, +77.98 billion yuan, and -19.99 billion yuan compared to last Friday [21]. - The trading-to-holding ratio of treasury bond futures generally increased. As of July 4, from a 5MA perspective, the trading-to-holding ratios of TS/TF/T/TL futures contracts were 0.27, 0.40, 0.38, and 0.85 respectively, with changes of +0.01, +0.03, +0.04, and -0.03 compared to last Friday [22]. 2.2 Spot Bond Trading - The turnover rate of 30-year treasury bonds decreased. On July 4, the turnover rate was 4.03%, down 3.90 percentage points from last week and up 0.61 percentage points from Monday, with an average weekly turnover rate of 4.21%. The weekly average turnover rate of interest rate bonds decreased, and the turnover rate on July 4 was 0.93%, down 0.09 percentage points from last week and up 0.28 percentage points from Monday [29]. - The turnover rate of 10-year China Development Bank bonds increased. On July 4, the turnover rate was 4.91%, up 0.45 percentage points from last week and up 1.60 percentage points from Monday [32]. 2.3 Basis Trading - The basis generally narrowed, while the net basis widened across the board. As of July 4, the basis (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were -0.02 yuan, 0.001 yuan, 0.14 yuan, and 0.25 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.05 yuan, +0.05 yuan, +0.16 yuan, and -0.07 yuan compared to last Friday [39]. - In terms of the net basis, the net basis of main contracts widened. As of July 4, the net basis (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were -0.05 yuan, -0.06 yuan, -0.11 yuan, and -0.11 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.01 yuan, -0.01 yuan, -0.07 yuan, and -0.12 yuan compared to last Friday [41]. - In terms of IRR, the IRR of T and TL main contracts increased, while the others decreased. As of July 4, the IRR (CTD) of TS/TF/T/TL main contracts were 1.65%, 1.69%, 1.89%, and 1.80% respectively, with changes of -0.20%, -0.23%, +0.03%, and +0.14% compared to last Friday [41]. 2.4 Inter-period and Inter-variety Spreads - Inter-period spreads showed mixed trends. As of July 4, the spreads between the near and far months of TS/TF/T/TL contracts were -0.12 yuan, -0.08 yuan, -0.08 yuan, and 0.13 yuan respectively, with changes of +0.01 yuan, -0.005 yuan, -0.07 yuan, and -0.01 yuan compared to last Friday [48]. - Inter-variety spreads of main futures contracts all narrowed. As of July 4, 2*TS - TF, 2*TF - T, 4*TS - T, and 3*T - TL were 98.77 yuan, 103.39 yuan, 300.92 yuan, and 206.13 yuan respectively, with changes of -0.06 yuan, -0.07 yuan, -0.19 yuan, and -0.14 yuan compared to last Friday [48].

6月我国制造业PMI为49.7%，前值为49.5%。制造业供需两端持续修复，生产指数环比回升0.3个百分 点，至51%，新订单指数环比回升0.4个百分点，至50.2%，新出口订单环比回升0.2个百分点，至 47.7%。值得注意的是，当前制造业PMI主要受产成品库存积压的阶段性拖累，随着库存逐步消化，叠 加需求端持续修复，新订单增长动能有望进一步释放，推动制造业景气水平稳步回升。 6月非制造业PMI为50.5%，较前值回升0.2个百分点。建筑业PMI回升1.8个百分点，至52.8%。建筑业 PMI边际回升，可能与"两重"项目加快落地、更大力度推动房地产止跌回稳等政策相关。服务业PMI环 比回落0.1个百分点，至50.1%。这可能与线下出行热度下行有关，随着五一、端午节假日影响退去，住 宿餐饮、道路运输等行业景气度有所回落。不过6月线上消费等服务业景气度回升或起到一定对冲作 用，此外货币金融服务、资本市场服务、保险等行业商务活动指数均处于高景气区间，综合来看，服务 业整体变化不大。 最近，期债总体在前期高点附近震荡整理。 6月PMI环比回升 政府债供给与资金面 今年上半年财政供给力度不弱，尤其国债供给进度较快，地 ...