美国，又在金融领域出手了。 当地时间 7 月 17 日 ，美国众议院以 308 票对 122 票通过美国的"天才法案"，18号当天，懂王正 式签署了该法案。 而这个所谓的天才法案，其实就是之前就让市场极其震动的 稳定币法案。 前两个月，这个法案还在讨论和通过程序之中，没有彻底落地。 最新的投票结束之后，现在正式获得众议院的通过，意味着稳定币彻底被美国招安，不再是灰黑 产业，可以登堂入室了。 稳定币地位提升，这几个月以来市场上有很多的解读。 多数的解读方向是： 美国利用稳定币，可以巩固美元霸权，确保市场上的美元支付的份额。 但我觉得现在多数人对于美元稳定币的解读，忽略了一个方向： 货币的流动性 稳定币带来的流动性，可能会导致"美元"双倍甚至多倍的增加 这一点要怎么理解？我下面给大家详细讲讲。 首先，1美元货币可以发行1枚美元稳定币，1枚美元稳定币绑定1美元美债。 这个对应关系和什么东西很像？ 港币的联系汇率 港币的联系汇率制度，就是要求港元兑美元汇率只能在7.75-7.85之间波动。 联系汇率确立之后，就相当于1美元和7.75-7.85的港元绑定。 汇丰、渣打以及中银想要发行港币，就必须要有对应额度的美元储备。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the legalization of stablecoins in the U.S. represents a significant shift in monetary policy, potentially allowing for increased liquidity and a new form of currency management that could rival the Federal Reserve [1][2][40]. - The "Genius Act," which has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, is essentially a stablecoin bill that legitimizes stablecoins, moving them from a gray market to a regulated financial instrument [3][4]. - The article suggests that the introduction of stablecoins could double or even multiply the purchasing power of the dollar, as one dollar can generate multiple stablecoins, leading to increased liquidity in the market [6][24][28]. Group 2 - The relationship between stablecoins and U.S. Treasury bonds is emphasized, indicating that stablecoins will likely be backed by U.S. debt rather than just the dollar itself, which could change the dynamics of currency issuance [13][14][37]. - The article discusses the potential for stablecoins to act as a "shadow central bank," allowing the U.S. government to issue currency without direct reliance on the Federal Reserve, thus altering the traditional monetary policy landscape [31][39]. - It is projected that the U.S. stablecoin market could grow from $200 billion to $2 trillion in three years, leading to an estimated $4 trillion in liquidity, which could significantly impact asset prices across the board [42][44].

Core Viewpoint - The legalization of stablecoins in the U.S. through the "Genius Act" is seen as a strategic move to enhance the liquidity of the dollar and potentially increase its dominance in the global market [1][2][3]. Group 1: Stablecoin Legitimization - The "Genius Act" passed by the U.S. House of Representatives signifies the formal acceptance of stablecoins, moving them from a gray area to a regulated status [1][3]. - The act is interpreted as a tool for the U.S. to solidify the dollar's supremacy and ensure its share in global payments [5][6]. Group 2: Liquidity Implications - The relationship between the dollar and stablecoins suggests that one dollar can generate multiple dollars in purchasing power through the issuance of stablecoins [24][28]. - The mechanism of stablecoins allows for a dollar to be used for transactions while simultaneously being used to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds, effectively doubling its utility [25][26]. Group 3: Impact on Monetary Policy - The introduction of stablecoins could lead to a scenario where the U.S. Treasury can issue debt without direct reliance on the Federal Reserve, potentially altering the dynamics of monetary policy [39][40]. - The expected growth of the stablecoin market from $200 billion to $2 trillion in three years could result in at least $4 trillion in liquidity, significantly impacting asset prices [42]. Group 4: Market Consequences - The influx of liquidity from stablecoins may create new wealth opportunities in certain assets but also risks inflating asset bubbles, particularly in dollar-denominated assets [48][49]. - The potential for the U.S. to shift towards stablecoins as a primary currency raises questions about the future necessity of the dollar [39][40].

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Views - Economic cycle: Tariff easing does not slow the cycle. Assuming the Fed's monetary policy remains cautious in the short - term (before the August central bank annual meeting), the constrained monetary liquidity (-0.42) is unlikely to change. After the short - term rebound of production and consumption indicators, the macro - economy may return to the cycle adjustment state. The real economic cycle has been more positive than expected since November 2024. As risk events land in the second and third quarters, the cycle bottoming process is expected to accelerate. The short - term economic cycle, especially the overseas economic cycle, is downgraded, and attention should be paid to the impact of the macro - demand decline on asset prices in the third quarter [8]. - Macro strategy: The US dollar may have only weakened temporarily in the first half of the year due to policy fluctuations and will turn to a safe - haven - driven rise in the second half as trade risks materialize. Gold's rise is cautious as the economic contraction effect of Tariff War 2.0 remains to be seen. The "Big Beautiful" bill expands the total scale of US Treasury bonds, and fiscal sustainability depends more on changes in interest - rate expectations. Interest rates may turn neutral from rising in the third quarter. A - shares have long - term attractiveness, and the yield curve should be steepened strategically after risks subside [9][10][11]. Summary by Directory Real Economic State: Tariff Easing Does Not Slow the Cycle - Short - term economic heat has rebounded. Production (+0.70) has improved month - on - month, and consumption (-0.02) has also significantly recovered (+0.37). However, forward - looking indicators and price - type indicators suggest that the macro - cycle has not improved significantly. With the Fed's cautious policy in the short - term, the constrained monetary liquidity (-0.44) is unlikely to change, and the macro - economy may return to adjustment after the short - term rebound [16]. Economic Growth: Short - term Inventory Replenishment Brings Resilience - Since mid - 2022, the global macro - cycle has been under pressure. As of May 2025, the global manufacturing PMI heat value is - 0.51 (-0.09), still in an "unfavorable" state. Except for Europe, the global macro - economic climate has slowed or declined to varying degrees [19][20]. Inflation: The Sound of Asset Price Bursting - The downward trend of macro - prices continues. Since August 2024, the global inflation heat value has been in a "cold" state. As of May 2025, it is - 0.47, up 0.11 percentage points month - on - month, and the risk of price adjustment remains. In June, there was a short - term rapid price increase, which may signal a cycle change [21][23]. Market Cycle Pricing: Focus on RMB Assets - The market's downward pricing remains unchanged. The real economic cycle has been more positive than expected since November 2024. As risk events land in 2025, the cycle bottoming process will accelerate. The short - term economic cycle, especially the overseas one, is downgraded. Attention should be paid to the impact of the third - quarter macro - demand decline on asset prices. High - interest - rate economies should focus on debt - fluctuation risks, while low - interest - rate economies should focus on the pressure of reduced real demand [26]. US Treasury Bond Liquidity: The US Cycle Continues to Be Pressured - The US debt - ceiling issue affects the US dollar. In 2025, the restart of the debt - ceiling issue increased the refinancing pressure of US Treasury bonds, and the market's macro - expectations of the US and Europe led to a decline in the US dollar index in the first half of the year. The resolution of the debt - ceiling issue is crucial for stabilizing US Treasury bond liquidity. The "Stablecoin Act" has limited short - term effects. The downgrade of the US sovereign credit rating may speed up the resolution of the debt - ceiling issue. The focus in the second half of the year is on the increase of the debt ceiling and the change of the Fed's balance - sheet policy [30][38][40]. High Energy Prices: A Stress Test for Non - US Cycles - There is a divergence in the money - market liquidity between China and Europe. The ECB cut interest rates in June, and its balance sheet has been shrinking. The People's Bank of China cut interest rates and reserve - requirement ratios in May, and its balance sheet has been expanding. High energy prices may affect the European economy, while China focuses on balancing debt leverage and improving real - economy liquidity [50]. Macro Strategy: Bearish but Not Short - Selling, Rising After a Slow Start - Global macro - policies are turning. The market needs to re - balance inflation expectations and interest rates. The US dollar may turn to a safe - haven - driven rise in the second half of the year. Gold's rise is cautious, and US Treasury bond interest rates may turn neutral. A - shares have long - term attractiveness, and the yield curve should be steepened strategically after risks subside [64][65][66]. Overseas Macro: Policy Aims to Expand, but Pressure Looms - The Fed's monetary policy is on standby. The short - term easing of the tariff war has improved the US financial conditions, but fiscal uncertainties remain. The Fed is cautious about cutting interest rates due to potential price pressure and needs a "low" and "moderate" interest - rate level [67]. Domestic Macro: Waiting for the Release of External Pressure - China's short - term economic data is relatively stable, but private - sector demand is under pressure. With the reduction of external "non - interest - rate - cut" constraints, domestic macro - policies may expand in the third quarter. However, there is a risk of a further decline in macro - data in the second half of the year [69].

1、《非农弱化美联储 Q3 降息 紧迫性——2025 年 5 月美国就 业数据分析》2025-06-07 2、《基建和制造业投资增速或 延续强势——2025 年 5 月宏观 经济预测报告》2025-06-06 3、《美国 Q1 工业品抢进口大 幅透支未来需求——2025 年 3 月美国行业库存数据点评》 2025-06-02 | 张静静 | S1090522050003 | zhangjingjing@cmschina.com.cn | | --- | --- | --- | | 张一平 | S1090513080007 | zhangyiping@cmschina.com.cn | | 马瑞超 | S1090522100002 | maruichao@cmschina.com.cn | | 罗丹 | S1090524070004 | luodan7@cmschina.com.cn | | 王泺宾 | S1090523070007 | wangluobin@cmschina.com.cn | | 张玉书 | 研究助理 | zhangyushu@cmschina.com.cn | ——宏观与大类资产周报 频率： ...