文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人：付春生（18482259975） 事 项 5月，CPI同比下降0.1%，预期下降0.2%，前值下降0.1%；核心CPI同比上涨0.6%，前值上涨0.5%。PPI同 比下降3.3%，预期下降3.2%，前值下降2.7%。 核心观点 物价环比的意义较同比可能更为重要。我们系统分析，从环比来看，今年以来的物价，哪些"强"，哪 些"弱"，更有助于全面和定量地看待物价的分化特征 。 CPI的"强"与"弱" 就CPI而言，因季节性较为明显且变动相对较小，若今年前5个月的环比累计涨幅大于2021-2024年同期环比 累计涨幅，定义为"强"，反之定义为"弱" 。 第一，整体来看 ，今年以来CPI环比累计涨幅为0%，弱于2021-24年同期的0.4%；但核心CPI环比累计涨幅 为0.5%，略好于2021-24年同期的0.4%。 第二，从大类来看 ， 食品 （ 今年环比累计涨幅-0.6%，过去4年同期为-1%，下同） 、 房租（0.1%， 0%）、核心商品（0.9%，0.1%） 价格"强"，能源（-2.3%，3.8%）、除房租以 ...

法律声明 华 创 证券研究所 定 位 为 面 向 专 业 投 资 者的研究团队，本资料仅适用于经认可的 专 业 投 资 者 ， 仅 供 在 新 媒 体 背景下研究 观 点 的 及 时 交 流 。 华 创证券不因任何订阅本资料的行为而将订 阅 人 视 为 公 司 的 客 户 。 普 通 投资者若使 用 本 资 料 ， 有 可 能 因 缺乏解读服务而对报告中的关键假设、评 级 、 目 标 价 等 内 容 产 生 理 解 上的歧义， 进 而 造 成 投 资 损 失 。 本资料来自华创证券研究所已经发布的研究报告，若对报告的摘编产生歧义，应以报告发布当日的完整内容为 准。须注意的是，本资料仅代表报告发布当日的判断，相关的分析意见及推测可能会根据华创证券研究所后续发 布的研究报告在不发出通知的情形下做出更改。华创证券的其他业务部门或附属机构可能独立做出与本资料的意 见或建议不一致的投资决策。本资料所指的证券或金融工具的价格、价值及收入可涨可跌，以往的表现不应作为 文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人： 付春生（18482259975） 根据《证券期货投资 ...

文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人： 陆银波（15210860866） 袁玲玲（微信 Yuen43） 报告摘要 继 5 月 10 日日内瓦经贸会谈后，近一周中美关税会谈再次出现新的积极变化： （一）总书记同美国总统特朗普通电话。总书记指出，"校正中美关系这艘大船的航向，需要我们把好 舵、定好向"，并"欢迎特朗普再次访华" ； 特朗普表示，"美方愿同中方共同努力落实协议。美方欢迎 中国留学生来美学习"；两国元首同意双方团队继续落实好日内瓦共识，尽快举行新一轮会谈。 （二）中美经贸磋商机制将举行首次会议 。 6 月 7 日，外交部发言人宣布：应英国政府邀请，中共 中央政治局委员、国务院副总理何立峰将于 6 月 8 日至 13 日访问英国。其间，将与美方举行中美经 贸磋商机制首次会议。 （三）稀土出口管制措施出现变化 。 6 月 7 日，商务部新闻发言人就中重稀土出口管制措施答记者 问，"已依法批准一定数量的合规申请，并将持续加强合规申请的审批工作。中方愿就此进一步加强与 相关国家的出口管制沟通对话"。 近一周，其他值得关注的政策： （一）外交：与 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the "trade-in" program for consumer goods is accelerating, particularly in the categories of home appliances and automobiles, while electric bicycles remain stable [1][2][3] - In May, the average daily trade-in volume for automobiles was approximately 38,000 units, a slight decrease from April's 39,000 units, while projections for September to December 2024 suggest an increase to 47,000 units per day [2][10] - Home appliances saw an increase in trade-in activity, with May's average daily volume reaching about 829,000 units, up from 630,000 units in April [2][10] - The trade-in volume for electric bicycles remained relatively stable, with May's average daily volume at approximately 62,000 units, compared to 65,000 units in April [2][11] Group 2 - The overall trade-in activity for the three consumer goods categories (automobiles, home appliances, and electric bicycles) showed an increase in May, with a weighted average daily trade-in volume rising from 92,000 units in April to 109,000 units in May [3][12] - The trade-in program is projected to drive significant sales, with the Ministry of Commerce estimating that the program will generate over 1.3 trillion yuan in product sales in 2024, and approximately 1.1 trillion yuan in the first five months of 2025 [4][5] - The macroeconomic indicators suggest a mixed outlook, with infrastructure projects and durable goods consumption being the main drivers of economic activity, while industrial production and external demand remain weak [15][16][22] Group 3 - The trade-in program's impact on consumer spending is significant, as evidenced by the strong sales figures driven by the program [4][5] - The weekly economic observations indicate a slight decline in the macroeconomic activity index, but it remains above 5%, suggesting ongoing economic recovery [15][16] - The trade-in program is part of a broader strategy to stimulate consumption and support economic growth, particularly in the context of fluctuating external trade dynamics [28][29]

Core Insights - The rapid growth of stablecoins and the introduction of regulations such as Hong Kong's Stablecoin Regulation and the US GENIUS Act have made stablecoins a focal point in the market [2][11] - The impact of stablecoin flows on short-term US Treasury yields is significant, with a net inflow of $3.5 billion leading to a decrease in 3-month Treasury yields by approximately 2-2.5 basis points within 10 days [2][6] - Conversely, outflows have a more pronounced effect, with a $3.5 billion outflow resulting in an increase of about 6-8 basis points in yields [2][6] - The influence of stablecoin flows is primarily concentrated in the short end of the yield curve, particularly affecting 3-month Treasury yields, while having minimal spillover effects on 2-year and 5-year yields [2][6] - Continued rapid expansion of the stablecoin market could significantly depress short-term Treasury yields, potentially disrupting the effectiveness of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy transmission [2][7] Group 1: Stablecoins and Safe Asset Prices - The total asset management scale of dollar stablecoins exceeded $200 billion by March 2025, surpassing the holdings of major foreign investors like China in short-term US securities [4][12] - Stablecoin issuers, particularly Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), support their tokens primarily through US Treasury bills and money market instruments, making them key players in the short-term debt market [4][12] - In 2024, dollar stablecoins purchased nearly $40 billion in US Treasury bills, comparable to the largest government money market funds in the US [4][12] Group 2: Data and Methodology - The research utilized daily frequency data from January 2021 to March 2025, sourced from various platforms including CoinMarketCap and Yahoo Finance [5][16] - The study focused on the 3-month Treasury yield as the primary variable, employing a simple univariate local projection model to analyze the impact of stablecoin flows [5][23] Group 3: Empirical Research on Stablecoin Flows - The empirical results indicate that a total inflow of $3.5 billion in stablecoins correlates with a decrease of approximately 2.5 basis points in the 3-month Treasury yield within 10 days, and up to 5 basis points within 20 days [6][35] - The contributions of different stablecoin issuers to yield changes were analyzed, with USDT accounting for approximately -1.54 basis points (70% of the total impact) and USDC contributing about 19% [6][38] Group 4: Discussion and Policy Implications - The potential for stablecoin market expansion to compress short-term Treasury yields raises concerns about the Federal Reserve's control over short-term interest rates [7][40] - The transparency of reserves is crucial, with USDC's disclosures being more transparent compared to USDT, highlighting the need for standardized reporting to mitigate systemic risks [7][41] - The strong demand for Treasuries from stablecoins may exacerbate the "safe asset scarcity" issue faced by non-bank financial institutions, affecting liquidity premiums [8][40]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the May non-farm payroll data, highlighting that while job additions slightly exceeded expectations, the overall employment market shows signs of slowing down, with a notable focus on wage growth as a positive aspect [1]. Group 1: Employment Data Overview - In May, non-farm employment increased by 139,000, surpassing the expected 130,000, with job growth concentrated in three sectors: education and health services (+87,000), leisure and hospitality (+48,000), and financial activities (+13,000) [2][16]. - The unemployment rate remained steady at 4.2%, but this stability was achieved at the cost of a declining labor force participation rate, which fell from 62.6% to 62.4% [5][22]. - The employment growth breadth has decreased, with the employment diffusion index dropping to 50%, indicating that job growth is becoming less widespread across various sectors [4][16]. Group 2: Wage Growth Insights - Wage growth in May was a highlight, with hourly earnings increasing by 0.4% month-over-month, exceeding the expected 0.3%, and a year-over-year increase of 3.9%, also above the anticipated 3.7% [6][31]. - The article emphasizes that the wage growth is crucial for protecting the purchasing power of consumers, particularly for low- and middle-income groups, amidst rising inflation concerns [6][12]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Following the non-farm report, market expectations for interest rate cuts have cooled, with the probability of a September rate cut dropping from 61.3% to 51.8% [3][35]. - The stock market reacted positively, with major indices such as the Dow Jones and Nasdaq rising, indicating a rebound in risk appetite among investors [3][35].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of tariff uncertainties on China's exports, emphasizing the need to understand the core contradictions in the export transmission path and to closely monitor key variables through a high-frequency tracking framework [4][17]. Group 1: Tariff Uncertainty and Export Impact - The fluctuations in Trump's tariffs create significant estimation errors regarding their impact on China's overall exports, making it crucial to identify key variables and track their changes [4][17]. - The core elements affecting U.S. import demand under tariff pressures include U.S. tariff policies, the transmission of tariffs to import prices, and the impact on consumer purchasing power [17]. Group 2: High-Frequency Tracking Framework - A high-frequency tracking framework has been established, consisting of six categories and sixteen indicators to monitor global trade demand, Chinese export volume and price, direct trade flow between China and the U.S., potential transshipment trade, U.S. import demand, and effective tariff rates [18]. - The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) and JPMorgan Global Manufacturing PMI are used to track global trade volume, indicating a downward trend in global cargo export volume growth [5][24]. - The RJ/CRB Index is employed to monitor global trade price growth, showing a recovery from -0.8% to 1.2% between April and May [6][25]. Group 3: Monitoring Chinese Exports - Container throughput at monitored ports is used to track China's export volume, which has shown a marginal decline from 7.3% to 6.7% year-on-year as of May 25 [7][29]. - The Producer Price Index (PPI) serves as a leading indicator for China's export prices, indicating a potential weakening trend in export prices over the next three months [8][33]. - Import data from South Korea and Vietnam are utilized as synchronous indicators for China's overall export performance, with recent data suggesting a marginal weakening in exports [9][41]. Group 4: U.S. Import Demand and Tariff Rates - U.S. import demand is tracked through IHS Markit customs data, revealing a decline in import amounts and container volumes, reflecting the impact of new tariffs [13][68]. - The effective tariff rate in the U.S. has increased from 6.3% in April to 8.1% in May, indicating a rising burden on imports [14][86]. - Predictions from the National Retail Federation suggest a significant drop in U.S. container imports, with expectations of a -13% year-on-year decline in May [78][79].

文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人： 李星宇（18810112501） 核心观点 5月全球大类资产总体表现为：全球股票（5.72%）>大宗商品（1.26%）>人民币（1.00%）> 0%>美元（-0.14%）>全球债券（-0.36%）。 报告摘要 十张图速览全球资产脉络 1、美国"大而美法案"通过或加剧美国长债风险 。共和党推动的"大而美法案"包括大规模减税及支出调整，引发市场对美国债务可持续性的担忧。当前美国国债规 模已突破36万亿美元，如果法案落地，预计2035年债务/GDP比率恐飙升至134%-149%，引发市场对财政可持续性的深度担忧。在此背景下，穆迪于5月16日将美 国主权信用评级从Aaa下调至Aa1。评级调降触发连锁反应，30年期美债收益率突破5%，同时需求端结构性走弱，30年期国债投标认购比例显著回落，反映全球投 资者对美债信用锚定的动摇。 2、美国经济衰退概率上升下美股防御性板块跑赢周期性板块 。关税政策升级与经济增速放缓的双重压力下，2025年美国股市呈现出防御性板块跑赢周期性板块的 特征。截至2025年5月底，美股防御板块 ...

Core Viewpoint - The macroeconomic focus in May is expected to shift towards exports, with internal changes remaining relatively small. The anticipated export growth rate is around 3.5%, while imports are expected to decline by approximately 2% [2][3][11]. Export - Overall export growth is projected to marginally decline but remains within an acceptable range, with a forecasted year-on-year growth of 3.5% in dollar terms for May [3][11]. - High-frequency data indicates a decrease in container throughput at monitored ports, with a year-on-year decline of 6.7% as of May 25, compared to 7.3% at the end of April [4][12]. - The number of container ships from China to the U.S. has decreased significantly, with a year-on-year drop of 20.2% in May, reflecting weak direct exports to the U.S. [4][12]. - Imports from ASEAN countries have also shown a marginal decline, with a year-on-year increase of 6.3% in ship arrivals in May, down from 8.3% in April [4][12]. Domestic Demand - Retail sales are expected to grow by around 5.5% in May, with strong performance in the automotive sector but weaker pricing [5][15]. - Fixed asset investment growth is projected to decline to approximately 3.8% for January to May, influenced by insufficient project availability [5][14]. - Consumer Price Index (CPI) is expected to show a year-on-year decline of about 0.4%, while Producer Price Index (PPI) is anticipated to decrease by around 3.5% [6][8]. Financial Data - New social financing is expected to reach 1.9 trillion yuan in May, a decrease of 100 billion yuan compared to the same period last year [6][16]. - M2 money supply is projected to grow by approximately 7.6% year-on-year, while new M1 is expected to increase by around 2.4% [6][16]. Real Estate - Real estate sales are anticipated to show a year-on-year decline of about 3.0% in May, with major cities reporting a decrease of 4.1% [15][16]. Summary - The report highlights a cautious outlook for exports and domestic demand, with specific attention to the automotive and real estate sectors. The financial landscape shows signs of slowing growth in social financing and investment, indicating potential challenges ahead for the economy [2][5][11][15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes a long-term bullish outlook on gold, driven by global order restructuring and geopolitical tensions, particularly in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the end of the U.S. interest rate hike cycle [2][3]. Summary by Reports Report 1: Strategic Bullish on Gold (December 2023) - Gold has been trading around $2000 per ounce for nearly three years, with a key resistance at $2050. The report argues that the global order is likely undergoing significant changes, influenced by ongoing geopolitical conflicts and the waning effects of the pandemic [3]. Report 2: Unusual Pricing of Gold (May 2024) - By May 2024, gold prices reached $2400-$2500 per ounce, but traditional pricing models failed to explain this surge. The report highlights a divergence from historical pricing models, suggesting that non-traditional factors are now driving gold prices [4]. Report 3: Extreme Scenarios for Gold Prices (March 2025) - In March 2025, gold prices hit $3000 per ounce, with the report exploring five extreme scenarios that could further elevate gold prices. It argues that market perceptions of gold's potential are underestimating its tail risk in a restructuring global order [5]. Report 4: Gold Implicit Order Restructuring Index (May 2025) - Following a price increase to $3300-$3400 per ounce, the report introduces a new analytical tool to capture the portion of gold price movements not explained by traditional models. This index reflects investor expectations regarding the restructuring of global financial and political orders [6][7]. Current View on Gold - The current price surge in gold is seen as a reflection of expectations surrounding global order restructuring, drawing parallels to historical periods of upheaval. The company maintains a strategic bullish stance on gold, highlighting its value in reducing portfolio volatility [9].