Core Viewpoint - Recent market focus on supply-side reform highlights the need to address "involution" in key industries such as photovoltaics, lithium batteries, new energy vehicles, and e-commerce platforms, with various sectors facing fundamental pressures [2][10] Industry Analysis 1. Policy Direction - "Involution" competition includes low-price competition, homogenization, and excessive marketing from enterprises, as well as unfair local government policies and market barriers [4] - Key industries targeted for "anti-involution" measures include photovoltaics, lithium batteries, new energy vehicles, and e-commerce platforms [4][10] - Measures to combat "involution" involve coordinated efforts on both supply and demand sides, government behavior regulation, and industry self-discipline [4] 2. Current Industry Status - **Photovoltaics**: Prices are weak, with a June index showing a year-on-year decline of 11.8%. However, production remains strong, with a 18.3% increase in solar cell output from January to May [5][13] - **Automobiles**: Increased low-price competition is evident, with sales discount rates rising to 25.2% in June. This trend may lead to intensified price wars among manufacturers [5][18] - **Steel**: Production decreased by 1.7% year-on-year from January to May, while prices remain weak, with a 13.4% decline in steel prices from January to June [5][23] - **Cement**: Production fell by 4% year-on-year, and prices have weakened, with a June index showing a 2.4% decline [5][26] - **Pork**: Production is strong but prices are weak, with net profits per pig dropping significantly, indicating the industry is nearing losses [5][29] 3. Anti-Involution Measures - **Photovoltaics**: Industry self-discipline is emphasized, with major manufacturers collectively reducing production by 30% and signing self-regulatory agreements [8][14] - **Automobiles**: Self-regulation is key, with companies like BYD halting aggressive pricing strategies and standardizing supplier payment terms [8][18] - **Steel**: A combination of self-discipline and administrative guidance is being implemented, with industry associations urging companies to manage production and cash flow effectively [8][24] - **Cement**: Measures include industry self-discipline and media supervision to ensure compliance with production standards and to recognize compliant companies [8][27] - **Pork**: Administrative guidance is being utilized, with reports of government requests for major producers to control breeding and market supply [8][30]

Group 1: Economic Trends - Service consumption shows an upward trend with domestic flight executions increasing to 14,300 flights in the first five days of July, up 4% year-on-year compared to 12,800 flights in June, which was up 0.8% year-on-year [1][10] - Land premium rates have rebounded from low levels, reaching 7.8% in the week of June 29, with a three-week average of 4.3%, compared to 4.93% in May [1][11] - Prices in coal and real estate infrastructure sectors have risen due to "anti-involution" trends, with prices for Shanxi-produced thermal coal increasing by 0.5%, rebar prices in Shanghai up by 2.9%, and iron ore price index rising by 2% [1][32] Group 2: Downward Economic Indicators - The Huachuang Macro WEI index remains at a high level at 6% as of June 29, down 1.63 points from 7.63% on June 22, indicating a general decline in indicators such as commodity housing transaction area and coal throughput [2][7] - Real estate sales have seen a significant decline, with a 30% year-on-year drop in housing transaction area in 67 cities in the first four days of July, compared to a 17.6% decline in June [2][10] - Foreign trade shows a decline, with container throughput at domestic ports dropping to a 3.1% year-on-year decrease as of June 29, down from 4.3% the previous week [2][18] Group 3: Debt and Interest Rates - The issuance of new special bonds has surpassed half of the annual target, with 2.2 trillion yuan issued by June 30, representing a 50.5% progress compared to 38.5% in the same period last year [3][38] - Interest rates have decreased post-half-year, with DR001 at 1.3140%, DR007 at 1.4222%, and R007 at 1.4881%, showing declines of -5.43bps, -27.46bps, and -43.2bps respectively from June 27 [3][46] Group 4: Production and Consumption - The construction sector shows fluctuations in asphalt and cement dispatch rates, with asphalt plant operating rates at 31.7%, up 6.5% year-on-year, while cement dispatch rates are at 40.8%, slightly down from the previous week [14][17] - Industrial production indicators such as coal throughput at Qinhuangdao port have shown a year-on-year increase of 8.3% in early July, maintaining stability compared to June [14][18] Group 5: Price Movements - Domestic commodity price indices have shown mixed trends, with the BPI down by 0.5% while the RJ/CRB commodity price index increased by 0.6% [31][37] - Prices for major commodities like copper, gold, and oil have risen, with COMEX gold at $3,332.5 per ounce, up 1.9%, and Brent crude oil at $68.3 per barrel, up 0.8% [31][37]

Core Viewpoint - The June non-farm payroll data exceeded expectations, indicating a robust job market, but there are mixed signals regarding employment strength and potential economic implications [1][3][14]. Group 1: Non-Farm Employment Data - In June, the U.S. added 147,000 non-farm jobs, surpassing the forecast of 106,000, marking the fourth consecutive month of exceeding expectations [1][14]. - Job growth was concentrated in four sectors: government (+73,000), education and healthcare services (+51,000), leisure and hospitality (+20,000), and construction (+15,000) [1][16]. - The employment diffusion index fell to 49.6%, indicating a low breadth of job growth compared to historical averages [14]. Group 2: Unemployment Rate - The unemployment rate decreased from 4.2% to 4.1%, below the expected 4.3%, with a decline in the labor force participation rate from 62.4% to 62.3% [2][20]. - Youth and female labor force participation saw significant declines, contributing to the drop in the unemployment rate [20][21]. Group 3: Wage Growth - Wage growth was below expectations, with hourly earnings increasing by 0.2% month-over-month, compared to the expected 0.3% [2][26]. - Weekly hours worked decreased from 34.3 to 34.2, leading to a 0.1% decline in weekly earnings, marking the first negative growth this year [2][26]. Group 4: Market Reactions - Following the non-farm report, market expectations for interest rate cuts diminished significantly, with July cut probabilities dropping from 25.3% to 4.7% and September from 91% to 70.7% [2][28]. - U.S. stock indices rose, with the Dow Jones up 0.77%, Nasdaq up 1.02%, and S&P 500 up 0.83%, while the dollar index increased by 0.35% [2][28].

Core Viewpoint - The document emphasizes that the research material is intended solely for professional investors recognized by Huachuang Securities, and it should not be shared or used by non-professional investors [1][2][3]. Group 1 - The research team at Huachuang Securities is positioned to provide timely exchanges of viewpoints for professional investors in the context of new media [3]. - The material is derived from previously published research reports by Huachuang Securities, and any discrepancies should refer to the complete content of the original report [4]. - The opinions and analyses presented may change without notice based on subsequent reports from Huachuang Securities [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the recent policy directions aimed at reducing "involution" in various industries, particularly focusing on the solar energy sector and the need for quality improvement and orderly competition [2][11]. Group 1: Policy Directions - On July 1, the Central Economic Committee meeting highlighted the importance of advancing a unified national market, addressing low-price disorderly competition, and promoting the exit of outdated production capacity [2][10]. - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology held a meeting on July 3 with 14 solar industry companies, reiterating the need to implement the decisions from the Central Economic Committee meeting and to enhance product quality [2][11]. Group 2: Trade Relations - The Ministry of Commerce addressed questions regarding U.S.-China trade relations, noting that there is no confirmation of a potential visit by Trump with a business delegation, and emphasized the need for mutual respect and cooperation [3][12]. - The Ministry of Commerce announced anti-dumping duties on brandy imported from the EU for five years and stated that measures would be taken in response to the EU's restrictions on Chinese companies in public procurement [3][13]. Group 3: Real Estate Market - The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development conducted research in Guangdong and Zhejiang, urging local authorities to effectively utilize real estate regulation policies and ensure the stability of the real estate market [4][13]. - The report noted that the overall real estate market remains stable, with a year-on-year increase in new and second-hand housing transactions, indicating a shift in market dynamics [4][13].

本资料来自华创证券研究所已经发布的研究报告，若对报告的摘编产生歧义，应以报告发布当日的完整内容为 准。须注意的是，本资料仅代表报告发布当日的判断，相关的分析意见及推测可能会根据华创证券研究所后续发 布的研究报告在不发出通知的情形下做出更改。华创证券的其他业务部门或附属机构可能独立做出与本资料的意 见或建议不一致的投资决策。本资料所指的证券或金融工具的价格、价值及收入可涨可跌，以往的表现不应作为 文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人： 陆银波（15210860866） 根据《证券期货投资者适当性管理办法》及配套指引，本资料仅面向华创证券客户中的金融机构专业投资者，请勿对本资料 进行任何形式的转发。若您不是华创证券客户中的金融机构专业投资者，请勿订阅、接收或使用本资料中的信息。本资料难 以设置访问权限，若给您造成不便，敬请谅解。感谢您的理解与配合。 华 创 证券研究所 定 位 为 面 向 专 业 投 资 者的研究团队，本资料仅适用于经认可的 专 业 投 资 者 ， 仅 供 在 新 媒 体 背景下研究 观 点 的 及 时 交 流 。 华 创证券不因任 ...

Core Viewpoint - The economic outlook for June and the second quarter suggests a low but stable growth trajectory, with GDP growth expected around 5.3% in Q2, supported by new domestic policies and resilient exports [2][4]. Group 1: GDP and Economic Growth - Q2 GDP growth is projected at approximately 5.3%, with industrial production growth expected at 5.9% due to equipment upgrades and resilient exports [4][11]. - Retail sector growth is anticipated to rebound, with wholesale and retail expected to grow by 6.8% in Q2, up from 5.8% in Q1 [4][11]. - High growth is expected in the information and leasing service sectors [4]. Group 2: Production Sector - June industrial production growth is expected to be around 6.0%, with a PMI production index increase to 51% [5][15]. - Truck traffic on highways shows a growth of 2.0% in June, improving from previous months [5][15]. - The automotive wholesale growth rate is projected at 14.1%, indicating strong performance in the automotive manufacturing sector [5][15]. Group 3: Demand Side - Retail sales growth is expected to temporarily decline to around 4.6% in June, influenced by holiday timing and promotional activities [6][20]. - Fixed asset investment growth is projected to decrease to approximately 3.4% for the first half of the year, with manufacturing investment at 8.1% and real estate investment at -11.2% [6][19]. - June export growth is expected to be around 3.5%, while imports are projected to grow by 1% [7][17]. Group 4: Financial Sector - New social financing in June is expected to reach 3.8 trillion, an increase of 600 billion compared to the previous year, with a projected growth rate of 8.8% for social financing stock [8][21]. - M2 money supply is expected to grow by approximately 7.9% year-on-year, while M1 is projected to grow by 2.9% [8][21]. - Government and corporate bond issuance is expected to total around 1.8 trillion in June, with significant net financing increases compared to the previous year [8][21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent trends in the US dollar, highlighting the divergence between a weakening dollar and rising US Treasury yields, suggesting caution in interpreting these signals as indicative of a broader trend towards de-dollarization [2]. Group 1: Conceptual Clarification - Two key concepts are defined: de-dollarization transactions, which involve selling dollar assets and reflect a contraction of US asset exposure, and weak dollar transactions, which do not require reducing dollar asset exposure but rather increasing short positions on the dollar [3]. Group 2: Background Context - Background 1: Since the strong dollar cycle began in 2014-2015, overseas institutions have maintained dollar exposure to benefit from both US Treasury yield spreads and dollar appreciation. By 2024-2025, major global pension funds have reduced their dollar hedging ratios to historical lows, indicating a significant dollar exposure [4]. - Background 2: There is a positive correlation between the dollar hedging ratios of pension funds and exchange rate volatility; higher volatility leads to stronger hedging demand [4]. Group 3: Current Analysis - Following the implementation of equal tariffs on April 3, the volatility of the dollar exchange rate has increased significantly. For institutions with large dollar exposures, there are two strategies: de-dollarization transactions or weak dollar transactions. The article leans towards weak dollar transactions as the primary reality, noting no significant outflows from US equities or bonds and a rise in speculative short positions on the dollar [5]. Group 4: Future Predictions - To predict the future of the dollar, two questions are posed: whether the short positions on the dollar have been fully covered and the structure of the holders of these short positions. Current data suggests that while some institutions have raised their hedging ratios, the momentum for covering short positions may have peaked, indicating a potential end to rapid dollar depreciation [9][10]. - The concentration of dollar short positions is at a historical low, suggesting a fragile trading structure. If the US economy remains stable and tech stocks perform well, there may be a risk of a rebound in the dollar as volatility decreases [10]. - Overall, the macro environment is characterized as "internal stability with external changes," with the narrative of de-dollarization being misinterpreted. The article concludes that the weakening of the dollar is nearing its end, with potential for a period of volatility or even a rebound [11].

文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人：夏雪 （微信 SuperSummerSnow） #出口系列 报告 20240603-全球制造业PMI回暖视角下的2024出口——出口扫描系列·机会篇 20240604-全球风险与中国挑战——出口扫描系列·风险篇 20240909-特朗普新关税主张对中国出口影响可能有多大？ —— 出口扫描系列·复盘篇 20240910-若美国挑起新一轮贸易战，与2018年有何异同？ —— 出口扫描系列·对比篇 20250118-找寻出口商品的"稳定之星" —— 出口扫描系列·变局篇 20250511-张瑜：出口不确定性的"β、α"二分法 20250607-不止是"出口" —— 中国出口研判进阶手册 核心观点 本篇作为出口深度思考系列第一篇，旨在帮助出口研究人员解决其通常面对的三个"灵魂"问题：这个月出口增速如何？过去几个月出口中抢进口、转港、异 动怎么"回头"定量？今年出口增速中枢怎么看？为了解答这三个问题，我们遍历中国出口相关的 40 余指标，尝试为每个问题构建最实用的跟踪体系。 报告摘要 一、问题之一：近月预测怎么做？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of increased tariffs on U.S. imports, highlighting the scale, regions, and types of goods being imported as a response to tariff changes [4][5][6]. Group 1: Tariff Increases - The effective tariff rate in the U.S. rose to 7% in April, with projections of 2.3% for 2024. The effective tariff rate on imports from China increased to 37.5% in April, up from 25% in March, and is expected to drop to 10.6% in 2024. For regions outside China, the effective tariff rate rose to 3.9% in April from 1.8% in March, with a forecast of 1% for 2024 [5][9]. Group 2: Scale of Imports - U.S. imports surged by approximately $188.3 billion, accounting for 68.6% of the average monthly import value for 2024. This surge indicates a potential drag on import growth of about 9.8% over the next seven months due to demand being pulled forward [6][12]. - The share of air freight in U.S. imports increased significantly, peaking at 37.1% in the first quarter of the year, compared to an annual average of 27.6% for 2024, before slightly declining to 31.5% in April [6][12]. Group 3: Sources of Imports - The primary regions contributing to the increase in U.S. imports include the Eurozone, ASEAN, Taiwan, Australia, and India, which collectively accounted for an 11 percentage point increase in year-on-year import growth [7][15]. - The air freight share from Australia, the Eurozone, India, Vietnam, and Taiwan saw significant increases, although there was a decline in April for Australia and the Eurozone, indicating a potential decrease in import momentum from these regions [15][20]. Group 4: Types of Goods Imported - The main categories of goods that U.S. companies have been importing include electronic products, pharmaceuticals, and raw metals, which together contributed 18.5 percentage points to the year-on-year import growth from January to April [8][23]. - In April, while the growth rates for pharmaceuticals and raw metals slowed, electronic products continued to show strong demand, contributing 4.1 percentage points to the overall import growth [23][24].