Group 1 - Gold prices experienced volatility, initially dropping below $3,300 to $3,296.37 before rebounding to close at $3,336.19 [1] - The U.S. stock market saw a collective decline, with the Dow Jones down 0.94% to 44,406.36 points, the S&P 500 down 0.79% to 6,229.98 points, and the Nasdaq down 0.92% to 20,412.52 points [1] - The U.S. government announced new tariffs on imports from 14 countries, with rates ranging from 25% to 40% depending on the country [4] Group 2 - The EU is still negotiating with the U.S. for a bilateral trade agreement before July 9, amidst rising tensions over tariffs [5] - Concerns are growing that the new tariffs could exacerbate inflation in the U.S., impacting consumer spending [6] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary indicated that the market is factoring in potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, with expectations of two cuts remaining this year [8] Group 3 - The Reserve Bank of Australia decided to maintain its cash rate at 3.85%, contrary to market expectations of a rate cut [9] - Recent unexpected rate cuts by central banks in Poland and Norway highlight a trend of monetary policy adjustments in response to economic conditions [11] - Investor sentiment in the U.S. stock market has shifted, with a recovery in indices despite ongoing concerns about tariffs and inflation [11]

虽然关税收入能在一定程度上缓解财政压力，但公共债务占GDP的比例仍预计将在2034年前后攀升至 119%。大多数减税措施不太可能显著提振消费，而最大的支出削减将集中在医疗保障和食品补助领 域。鉴于该预算案对经济增长的实际拉动作用有限，Lombard Odier维持此前对美国经济增速的预测： 2025年增长1.3%，2026年增长1.4%。 【白银技术面分析】 尽管美国政府称其财政计划为"一项宏大而美丽的法案"，但Lombard Odier却难以从中看到任何值得乐 观的地方。该机构认为，这项预算案在宏观经济层面几乎没有提振作用，反而可能进一步恶化财政前 景。战略分析师Filippo Pallotti指出，该法案预计将在未来十年内使联邦赤字扩大约4万亿美元；如果减 税措施被永久化，赤字规模甚至可能更高。 周二（7月8日）欧市盘中，白银走势偏弱运行，截至发稿报36.70美元/盎司，跌幅0.11%。特朗普8月1 日的关税实施以及潜在的惩罚性关税带来了政策不确定性，但强劲的经济数据持续削弱贵金属的避险溢 价。 【要闻聚焦】 白银的技术面走势表明，交易者正等待更深幅度的回调后再重新入场。尽管中期上升趋势在关键均线上 方保 ...

中辉有色观点 | 品种 | 核心观点 | 主要逻辑及价格区间 | | --- | --- | --- | | | | 特朗普推迟对等关税大限，已经向多国发出 25%——40%不等的关税威胁。另 | | 黄金 | 高位震荡 | 外市场美国财政扩张既成事实，多国财政继续扩大，中长期货币宽松、不确定 | | | | 性仍然较多，长期全球秩序尚在重塑，黄金战略配置。【765-790】 | | | | 未来几年一个确定性的趋势是各国政府将像美国一样更多依靠财政赤字刺激经 | | 白银 | 强势震荡 | 济，白银需求有支撑。白银盘面 8700 附近支撑较强，受基本金属和黄金价格情 绪影响较大，高位区间思路操作，做好仓位控制。【8800-9075】 | | | | 特朗普关税施压，宏观情绪回落，短期非美地区铜库存紧张和铜精矿扰动对铜价有 | | 铜 | 多单持有 | 支持，铜回调企稳后仍可逢低试多，中长期我们对铜依旧看好。沪铜关注区间 | | | | 【78000，80000】 | | | | 特朗普关税施压，宏观情绪回落，基本面锌精矿加工费修复，国内锌库存小幅 | | 锌 | 震荡 | 累库，国内消费淡季，锌承压回落，长 ...

Core Viewpoint - BlackRock Investment Institute upgraded the rating of European government bonds from slightly underweight to neutral, citing the attractiveness of eurozone bonds compared to U.S. Treasuries [1] Group 1: Investment Outlook - The institute believes that eurozone government bonds and credit markets offer more attractive yields than U.S. bonds [1] - The increase in term premium has brought yields closer to the institute's expected levels [1] Group 2: Economic Context - Persistent inflation in the U.S. prevents the Federal Reserve from significantly lowering interest rates [1] - The large scale of the U.S. fiscal deficit may lead investors to demand higher returns for holding long-term U.S. Treasuries [1] Group 3: Regional Preferences - Within the eurozone, BlackRock favors bonds from non-core members such as Italy and Spain [1]

| 贵金属日评20250708:中国央行6月续增持黄金储备,特朗普政府开始对各国设定新税率 | 交易日期 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 较昨日变化 | 较上周变化 | 2025-07-01 | 2025-07-07 | 2025-07-04 | 收盘价 | 771. 30 | 777.06 | 776.10 | -5. 76 | -4. 80 | | | | | | 成交量 | 213782.00 | 190256.00 | 171739.00 | -23, 526. 00 | 18, 517. 00 | 期货活跃合约 | 持仓重 | 175040.00 | 167465.00 | 175760.00 | 720.00 | 8, 295. 00 | | | | 库存(十克) | 21456.00 | 21456.00 | 18453.00 | 0. 00 | 3,003.00 | 上海黄金 | 收盘 ...

Group 1: New Zealand and Australia Economic Outlook - Westpac Bank expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand to keep the official cash rate unchanged in July, adopting a wait-and-see approach for future rate adjustments [1] - The Reserve Bank of New Zealand may allow the market to interpret potential rate changes and will decide based on economic data released before the August monetary policy statement [1] - The Reserve Bank of New Zealand might indicate that economic activity in Q1 2025 could exceed expectations, although subsequent indicators show a slowdown in economic momentum [1] - The Reserve Bank of Australia did not cut rates in July as widely anticipated, but future rate cuts remain a possibility, contingent on upcoming inflation data [2] - The Reserve Bank of Australia stated that inflation risks have become more balanced, suggesting that while there is no immediate pressure to cut rates, it may be delayed rather than canceled [2] Group 2: Japan's Economic Challenges - Mizuho Securities analysts suggest that the Bank of Japan should maintain its current policy amid external uncertainties, particularly regarding U.S. tariffs [3] - The potential for a 25% tariff on Japanese imports by the U.S. starting August 1 adds uncertainty and could negatively impact Japan's exports and overall economic performance [3] - Mitsubishi UFJ Securities economists believe that U.S. tariffs will challenge Japan's economy, especially in exports and capital investment, prompting the government to consider broader economic stimulus measures [3] - Japan's central bank plans to slow the pace of its bond purchase reduction starting April 2026, considering market stability and participant feedback [3] Group 3: Singapore's Economic Performance - DBS Group economists indicate that Singapore's economy may avoid technical recession in Q2 2025 due to early shipments by export companies, which temporarily supported actual export growth [4] - While short-term export data appears strong due to early deliveries, long-term challenges loom for Singapore's export sectors, particularly electronics and biopharmaceutical manufacturing, due to potential U.S. tariff measures [4]

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming Japanese Senate election is creating uncertainty in the bond market, with the ruling coalition potentially losing its majority, leading to a significant sell-off in long-term Japanese government bonds [1][3]. Group 1: Election Impact on Bond Market - The yield on Japan's 30-year government bonds rose by 12.5 basis points to 3.09%, while the 40-year bond yield is nearing historical highs due to investor concerns over the ruling coalition's performance in the upcoming election [1]. - Polls indicate that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its coalition partner Komeito may lose their majority, which could trigger expectations of more aggressive fiscal stimulus, further pushing up long-term bond yields [3][4]. - The ruling coalition needs to secure at least 50 out of 125 seats to maintain its majority, with the election focusing on economic stimulus proposals [4]. Group 2: Political and Economic Implications - If the ruling coalition loses, the new government may favor larger fiscal stimulus measures, increasing Japan's already high public debt burden [4]. - The market is likely to price in a more fluid political situation if the ruling coalition loses the Senate, which could lead to increased volatility and downward pressure on Japanese stocks [3][4]. - The Bank of Japan faces a dilemma in normalizing its monetary policy due to market volatility and election uncertainties, potentially delaying the reduction of its bond-buying program [5].

Group 1 - The market is overly optimistic about the economic outlook, ignoring the negative impacts of unprecedented high tariffs, particularly on small businesses and inflation [1] - Multiple factors, including tariffs, a weak dollar, and potential demand slowdown, are impacting the inflation outlook, with tariffs expected to drive inflation higher in the second half of the year [1] - The labor market's ability to buffer against economic recession is weaker than in any period post-pandemic, with fewer job vacancies per unemployed person compared to 2021-2022 [1] Group 2 - The U.S. fiscal policy is creating a tug-of-war effect on economic growth, with both tariffs and fiscal measures raising inflation risks [2] - Inflation-protected assets, such as TIPS, appear relatively cheap, and could benefit if market sentiment shifts towards inflation concerns [2] - The Federal Reserve's economic forecast suggests a median expectation of a 50 basis point rate cut this year, but inflation pressures may lead to fewer cuts than anticipated [2]

2025年已然过半，中国经济总体平稳运行，而这背后显然离不开更加积极财政政策的助力。 "面对国际经贸环境急剧变化，上半年宏观经济延续稳中向好态势，经济增长韧性超出普遍预期，一个重 要原因就是今年财政政策逆周期调节力度加大，发力节奏适度前置，促消费、稳投资作用凸显。"东方金 诚首席宏观分析师王青告诉第一财经。 在近些年推动经济平稳运行的宏观政策体系中，财政政策是一大支柱，今年中国首次提出实施"更加积极 的财政政策"，力度空前。上半年财政政策执行情况如何？对经济增长、民生保障等究竟起到什么作用？ 下半年财政政策如何实施、重点在哪？ 财政政策积极有力 自2008年国际金融危机以来，中国连续17年采用积极财政政策，即政府在经济增长乏力时通过增加支 出、减少税收、扩大赤字、发行政府债券、增加转移支付等手段，刺激总需求，促进经济复苏和增长的一 种宏观调控政策。 与往年有所不同的是，面对复杂的内外形势，今年的政府工作报告首次提出"更加积极的财政政策"，其中 今年财政赤字率首次提到4%左右高位，新增政府债务总规模达到11.86万亿元，比去年增加2.9万亿元， 释放了财政政策扩张加码稳经济信号。 2025.07. 08 本文字 ...

上天天基金APP搜索【777】注册即可 领500元券包 ， 优选基金10元起投！限量发放！先到先得！ 特朗普"极限施压"美联储降息的真实目的曝光。 《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip在最新发布的文章中表示，美国总统特朗普要求美联储降息的目的是， 希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先策略。文章警告称，这种"财政主导"模式往往导致通胀、危机和经 济停滞的"危险组合"。 7月7日，美国财长贝森特表示，市场可能在将特朗普的降息观点计入价格。贝森特认为，今年剩下的时间将会 降息两次。关键不仅在于美联储主席鲍威尔，更在于整个联邦公开市场委员会。 同日， 特朗普贸易顾问纳瓦罗表示，美联储主席鲍威尔维持政策利率不变的做法正在造成严重伤害。 纳瓦罗 呼吁美联储理事会干预鲍威尔的立场。纳瓦罗还表示，鲍威尔导致收入损失和利息支出增加。 特朗普的真实目的 7月6日消息，《华尔街日报》资深央行记者Greg Ip发表文章称，特朗普近期密集要求美联储主席鲍威尔降 息，他希望通过更低的利率来满足自己的财政优先目标，为美国国会刚通过的减税法案提供更便利的融资支 持。 Greg Ip表示，特朗普正试图打破预算赤字与利率之间的传统联系。传 ...