关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、 陈达飞、李欣越 联系人 | 李欣越 关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 摘要 美元指数大幅下跌，原油价格暴涨。 当周，海外涨跌分化，韩国综合指数上涨2.9%，德国DAX 下跌 3.2%，道指下跌1.3%。10Y美债收益率下行10bp至4.41%；美元指数下跌1.1%至98.15。 WTI原油大涨 13%至73.0美元/桶，COMEX黄金上涨3.8%至3432.6美元/盎司。 中美第二轮贸易谈判结束，等待领导人批准协议。 6月11日，中美双方于伦敦举行的第二轮贸易谈判结 束，重点聚焦于落实日内瓦协议执行细节，涉及设立出口监督机制、放开稀土出口、优化学生签证等问 题。目前，谈判已完成，正等待双方领导最终批准。 5月美国核心CPI弱于市场预期，失业金申领人数上升。 5月美国核心CPI环比0.1%，低于市场预期，其中 服装、新车大幅降温，家电、玩具等分项仍有所升温，美国CPI在三、四季度或仍将进入上行区间；截止 6月7日当周，美国失业金初申领人数24.8万人，高于市场预期。 风险提示 地缘政治冲突升级；美国经济放缓超预期；国内政策变化超预期。 报告正文 1 大类资产：美元指 ...

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭 联系人| 贾东旭 摘要 核心观点：随后续政策性金融工具推出，信贷表现或趋于稳定持续走强。 5 月金融数据中最突出的变化是 M1 增速回暖，主要原因或有两点：其一，去年 "资金防空转" 政策下的低基数效应；其二，房地产销售边际回暖带 动资金注入企业端。 5月M1同比回升0.8个百分点，一方面源于去年"资金防空转"治理，使企业活期存款基数快速下降；另一方面，5月商品房成交 同比降幅收窄，部分资金转化为企业活期存款。 信贷持续性偏弱主要归因于企业部门，企业中长期贷款已连续两个月同比少增超1500亿元，这与PPI同比降幅扩大、企业未来预期不确定性仍存密切 相关。 企业投资计划与价格走势紧密相连，5月PPI同比降幅扩大至-3.3%，这或许预示着企业投资计划将进一步削减。同时，5月PMI中的企业生产 经营预期指数为也处于2024年10月以来的较低水平。 新增社会融资规模同比多增幅度收窄，主要是由于政府债净融资的基数抬升，财政融资"前置"推动社融快速改善的阶段可能已趋于结束。 社融存量 同比从2024年底的8.0%上升至8.7%，主因政府债净融资"前置" 。5月政府债净 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the transition into a "new phase" of transformation and a "reform period" for policies, questioning whether external shocks are obstacles or opportunities [5] - It highlights the end of the "American exceptionalism" narrative as a significant expectation gap in the first half of the year [8] - The impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy is identified as a major contradiction for the second half of the year, with a focus on inflation trends [9] Deep Dive Topics - The mid-year outlook emphasizes the need for new changes in policies, particularly regarding U.S. tariffs, tax cuts, and monetary policy, as domestic export data enters a "verification period" [11] - The article explores the emergence of new policy financial tools aimed at stabilizing growth, suggesting that these tools are becoming increasingly relevant [12][14] - The booming inbound tourism sector is analyzed, noting the expansion of visa-free access for additional countries, which is expected to have significant macroeconomic implications [15] High-Frequency Tracking - The article notes a shift in export strategies, with a transition from targeting emerging markets to focusing on the U.S. market [17] - It identifies three characteristics of stabilizing core CPI based on May inflation data [19] - The upcoming second round of U.S.-China trade negotiations is highlighted, with stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm employment data [22] Policy Updates - Recent communications between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Trump emphasize the importance of maintaining a cooperative relationship and mutual respect [27][28] - The article discusses the implications of ongoing trade negotiations with various countries, including Canada, the EU, and Mexico, and their potential outcomes [23]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in global macroeconomic narratives from "American exceptionalism" to "American denialism," driven by factors such as tariff impacts, fiscal constraints, and the implications of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" [2][8]. Group 1: Narrative Shift - The global macroeconomic narrative has transitioned from "American exceptionalism" to "American denialism" in the first half of 2025, influenced by tariff disruptions and trade conflicts [3][8]. - In early 2025, the S&P Global Manufacturing PMI remained above the neutral mark for three consecutive months, indicating resilience in industrial production, but fell below 50 in April [2][8]. - The IMF revised its global GDP growth forecast for 2025 down to 2.8%, with the U.S. forecast reduced from 2.7% to 1.8% [2][23]. Group 2: Economic Contradictions - The economic impact of tariffs has become a central theme, with the focus shifting to macro data validation rather than negotiation processes [4][53]. - The average tariff rate in the U.S. surged from 2.4% at the end of 2024 to approximately 16% by May 2025, marking a significant increase [4][54]. - The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" primarily extends existing tax cuts, which may have limited economic stimulation effects but could increase long-term debt supply pressure [4][84]. Group 3: Paradigm Shift in Asset Safety - The current economic baseline for the U.S. is a slowdown without recession, with inflationary pressures expected to persist for 2-3 quarters [5][8]. - The article suggests that if the dollar and U.S. Treasury bonds no longer serve as "safe assets," it could challenge the high valuations of U.S. tech stocks and the sustainability of twin deficits [6][8]. - The transition from "American exceptionalism" to "American denialism" raises questions about the long-term viability of U.S. assets in the global market [6][8].

Group 1: Industrial Production - Industrial production remains stable, with a slight year-on-year decrease in blast furnace operating rates by 0.2 percentage points to 2.1% [2][5] - The chemical chain shows resilience, with soda ash operating rates increasing by 2.7 percentage points, while PTA and polyester filament operating rates are stable compared to the previous week [2][15] - The automotive semi-steel tire operating rate has significantly decreased, down 4.4 percentage points to 6.7% year-on-year [2][15] Group 2: Construction Industry - The construction industry is experiencing weak performance, with a slight year-on-year decline in grinding operating rates by 0.1 percentage points to 1.9% [2][25] - Cement shipment rates have increased by 3.2 percentage points year-on-year, while asphalt operating rates have slightly risen by 0.8 percentage points to 4.3% [2][25] Group 3: Downstream Demand - New housing transactions have sharply declined, with average daily transaction area falling by 28.2% year-on-year [2][47] - Rail freight volume related to domestic demand has decreased by 2.4% year-on-year, while port cargo throughput and container throughput have also seen significant declines of 4% and 10.9% respectively [2][58] - The CCFI composite index has rebounded significantly, increasing by 3.3% month-on-month, with the West America route seeing a notable price increase of 9.6% [2][77] Group 4: Price Trends - Agricultural product prices are showing divergence, with pork and egg prices decreasing by 0.3% and 0.9% respectively, while vegetable and fruit prices have increased by 1.1% each [3][89] - The South China industrial product price index has decreased by 0.2% month-on-month, with energy and chemical prices down by 0.4% and metal prices down by 0.1% [3][100]

Group 1 - The tourism market is experiencing a strong recovery, with inbound tourism showing particularly robust growth, as evidenced by flight execution and travel orders. In 2024, domestic travel has rebounded to 56.1% of historical trends, while inbound tourism has reached 81.9% of historical trends, with travel exports recovering to 138% of 2019 levels [2][10][83] - From the perspective of visitor demographics, tourists from Southeast Asia are showing significant recovery in inbound tourism, while recovery from regions like North America is slower. In 2024, the proportion of visitors to Shanghai from Southeast Asia is 22.5%, up 6.8 percentage points from 2023, while the proportion from North America has decreased by 2 percentage points [2][17][83] - The recovery pace of China's inbound tourism market is accelerating after 2024, indicating that the tourism market's recovery is not solely dependent on scale expansion. By April 2025, inbound tourist numbers in Shanghai reached 115.3% of the 2019 average, surpassing countries like Thailand and Singapore [3][23][83] Group 2 - The increase in inbound tourism is driven by the facilitation of visa policies and cultural exports, which effectively stimulate inbound demand. Since 2024, the expansion of visa-free policies has significantly boosted inbound tourism, with 20.12 million foreign visitors entering through visa exemptions, a year-on-year increase of 112.3% [4][26][84] - Historical examples show that optimizing visa policies can effectively release inbound tourism demand. For instance, Japan's gradual relaxation of visa policies from 2013 led to a substantial increase in inbound visitors, from 8.358 million in 2012 to 31.882 million in 2019 [4][34][84] Group 3 - The potential for growth in inbound tourism is significant, as the current export of travel and entertainment services as a percentage of GDP is notably lower than that of other countries, primarily due to the low openness of the service sector. In 2024, travel exports are projected to account for only 0.1% of GDP, compared to a global average of 1.6% [6][50][61] - The Chinese government is increasing its focus on the opening of the service sector, which is expected to release substantial demand for inbound tourism. Policies aimed at enhancing service sector openness have been introduced, including a comprehensive pilot program to accelerate the opening of the service industry [7][66][61]

关注、加星，第一时间接收推送！ 文 | 赵伟、贾东旭、侯倩楠 联系人 | 贾东旭 摘要 在当前宏观政策积极发力稳增长的背景下，政策性金融工具备受关注。前两轮其成效显著，本轮新型工 具何时可能落地？资金投向又会有哪些新动向？本文分析，可供参考。 短期还有哪些稳增长工具值得期待？政策性金融工具或"呼之欲出"。 4月政治局会议对宏观政策做出新部署，货币政策率先在5月初落地，财政政策方面，政府债发行依旧保 持积极态势，短期内增量可能来源于政策性金融工具。 货币政策上，央行于 5月7日推出三大类货币政策 措施及十项具体举措。财政政策方面，除政府债净融资维持高位外，增量资金来源需关注政治局会议提 出的 "新型政策性金融工具"。 政策性金融工具可能在6月底落地，一方面源于发改委给出的指引，另一方面也和当前经济基本面稳健有 关。 国家发展改革委副主任表示，"力争6月底前下达2025年'两重'建设和中央预算内投资全部项目清 单，同时设立新型政策性金融工具。"另外，当前经济基本面表现稳健，5月乘联会乘用车零售同比 13.0%，出口相关指标也处于较高区间。 同时，5 月份以来，多地积极筹备项目并准备申报，召开新型政策性金融工具政策 ...

Group 1: Policy Developments - President Xi Jinping and President Trump discussed the importance of US-China relations, emphasizing the need for mutual respect and cooperation in economic matters [1][2] - The introduction of the "Regulations on Government Data Sharing" aims to enhance government digital governance and service efficiency, addressing the issue of "data silos" [2][3] - The Ministry of Finance and other departments announced a unified horizontal ecological compensation mechanism focusing on the Yangtze and Yellow River basins to improve ecological protection [4][5] Group 2: Urban Development Initiatives - The Ministry of Finance announced support for 20 cities, including Beijing and Tianjin, for urban renewal projects, with a total expected subsidy exceeding 20 billion [7][8] - The initiative aims to improve urban infrastructure and promote sustainable urban development through various financing methods [8] Group 3: Human Resources and Manufacturing Integration - The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security launched a pilot program to integrate human resources services with the manufacturing sector, focusing on cities with advanced manufacturing bases [9][10] - The program aims to establish a standard system for human resources services in manufacturing and enhance regulatory measures against illegal practices [9][10]

Core Viewpoints - The improvement in consumer demand stabilizes the core CPI, but supply-side factors significantly suppress inflation readings [3][72] - The core commodity PPI shows a notable rebound primarily due to demand improvement, with tariff impacts on prices not intensifying [3][72] - The overall CPI aligns with market expectations, with food supply showing a mixed performance leading to a slight decline in food CPI [28][74] Group 1: Core CPI Characteristics - Characteristic 1: The core commodity PPI rebounded by 0.3 percentage points to -1.4% YoY, driven by sustained effects of consumption policies and a moderation in tariff impacts [3][72][8] - Characteristic 2: The core commodity CPI increased by 0.1 percentage points to 0.2% YoY, supported by consumption policies and rising gold prices, with gold jewelry prices up 40.1% YoY [19][73] - Characteristic 3: The service CPI rose by 0.2 percentage points to 0.5% YoY, aided by an increase in holiday days, which enhanced service demand [22][61] Group 2: Future Outlook - The combination of policy reinforcement and recovery in domestic demand is expected to alleviate inflationary pressures, although supply-side changes may still impose constraints on price readings [5][74] - Continued emphasis on policies to boost service consumption may further improve core service CPI, while the "old-for-new" policy could support core commodity CPI and PPI [5][74] - Despite these positive factors, low capacity utilization in downstream sectors and uncertainties regarding tariffs may still limit price recovery [5][74] Group 3: Regular Tracking - The CPI remained flat YoY, with improvements in both core commodity and core service CPI [38][74] - The PPI continued to decline, with a YoY drop of 0.6 percentage points to -3.3%, particularly in production materials [38][74] - Food CPI showed a slight decline due to mixed supply conditions, with fresh fruits and fish prices rising while seasonal vegetables saw price drops [28][74]

Core Viewpoint - The role of "export grabbing" is shifting from emerging markets to the U.S. as May exports show a decline due to the retreat of "export grabbing" and a high base effect from the previous year [3][53]. Export Analysis - May exports fell by 3.3 percentage points to 4.8% year-on-year, influenced by a high base and a decline in exports to ASEAN (-6.0 percentage points to 15.1%) and India (-9.2 percentage points to 12.7%) [3][10]. - The export growth of midstream manufacturing remains high but shows a marginal decline, with energy resource exports dropping significantly, from 7.4% and 1.3% in April to 6.3% and -3.5% in May, respectively [3][17]. - There are emerging signs of "export grabbing" towards the U.S., with May exports to the U.S. declining by 13.5 percentage points to -34.4%, but certain categories like toys (+5.4 percentage points to -1.1%) and clothing (+3.7 percentage points to 2.5%) show recovery [4][19]. Future Outlook - In June, the focus is expected to shift from emerging markets to the U.S. for "export grabbing," with overall export growth likely to receive some support [4][29]. - Three indicators suggest continued "export grabbing": positive year-on-year growth in processing trade imports in May, a surge in container bookings from the U.S. in late May, and a seasonal price increase in Yiwu small commodities [4][29]. Import Analysis - May imports fell by 3.4% year-on-year, primarily due to a decline in bulk commodity imports, with copper (-18.6% to 5.8%), crude oil (-8.2% to -0.8%), and iron ore (-5.1% to -3.8%) all showing decreases [6][56]. - The import growth of electromechanical products saw a slight increase (+0.1 percentage points to 5.5%), while bulk commodity imports declined significantly [6][44]. Sector-Specific Trends - In consumer goods, the export growth of consumer electronics increased (+1.5 percentage points to 3.8%), while light industrial products and real estate chain goods saw declines [5][55]. - Capital goods and intermediate goods exports showed divergence, with ship exports rising (+7.6 percentage points to 43.7%) while general machinery exports fell (-11.4 percentage points to 5.6%) [5][35]. - Exports to major economies showed a general decline, with exports to the U.S. down (-13.5 percentage points to -34.4%) while exports to the UK increased (+13.1 percentage points to 15.8%) [5][40].