Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Recommended" rating for the automotive industry, indicating a positive outlook for the sector's fundamentals and expected performance exceeding the benchmark index [5][29]. Core Insights - The automotive industry experienced an overall increase of 2.4% from August 3 to August 9, with significant developments in the robotics sector catalyzing interest in the automotive supply chain, particularly in midstream manufacturing and automotive components [1][12]. - Key events include the launch of the world's first robot consumption festival in Beijing and the Shanghai government's plan to develop the embodied intelligence industry, aiming for a core industry scale of over 50 billion yuan by 2027 [1][26]. - Notable vehicle launches include the successful pre-sale of the new models from the Zhijie brand, with over 10,000 orders within the first hour [1][24]. Market Performance Overview - The automotive sector's performance was positive, with most sub-sectors showing gains. The motorcycle and other segments saw the highest weekly increase of 9.6%, while automotive parts and services rose by 4.5% and 2.2%, respectively [2][12]. - Individual stock performance was varied, with notable gainers including Zhongma Transmission (+49.5%) and Huami New Materials (+34.0%), while Jianghuai Automobile saw a decline of 7.2% [3][14]. Recent Developments - The report highlights several key developments, including the establishment of a subsidiary in Spain by Changshu Automotive Decoration and advancements in flying car technology by XPeng [9][22]. - BYD announced a breakthrough in its fifth-generation DM technology, achieving a new low in fuel consumption of 2.6L per 100 km under NEDC conditions [25]. - The report also notes the significant investment by Zhijie in R&D, with plans to expand its team to 5,000 and introduce multiple new products [24][27].

Group 1: Core Insights - The report introduces a quantitative model solution for addressing the value-growth style switching issue based on odds and win rates [1][8] - The recent performance shows that the growth style portfolio achieved a return of 2.54%, while the value style portfolio returned 2.24% [1][8] Group 2: Odds - The relative valuation levels of market styles are key factors influencing expected odds, which are negatively correlated [2][14] - The current estimated odds for the growth style is 1.11, while for the value style it is 1.09 [2][14] Group 3: Win Rates - Among seven win rate indicators, four point to growth and three to value, resulting in a current win rate of 53.87% for growth and 46.13% for value [3][16] Group 4: Investment Expectations and Strategy Returns - The investment expectation for the growth style is calculated at 0.14, while for the value style it is -0.04, leading to a recommendation for the growth style [4][18] - Since 2013, the annualized return of the style rotation model based on investment expectations is 27.62%, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.02 [4][19]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a rating of "Add" for the company with a target valuation of 19.00 - 22.00 CNY, while the current stock price is 15.89 CNY [3]. Core Views - The company's performance is improving, with a significant expected increase in net profit for the first half of 2025, projected to be between 300 million to 360 million CNY, representing a year-on-year growth of 79%-115% and 156%-204% for non-recurring net profit [1]. - The company is experiencing robust growth in its core business, particularly in the electric tool market, with overseas orders increasing, and is expected to see overseas revenue contribution rise above 50% [10][11]. - The BBU (Battery Backup Unit) business is anticipated to yield excellent returns due to the rapid application of AI computing power, with the company actively entering this market and beginning shipments [7][27]. Financial Data and Valuation - The company forecasts total revenue of 52.22 billion CNY for 2023, with a projected growth rate of 29% in 2024 and 21% in 2025 [2][37]. - The estimated net profit for 2025 is 759 million CNY, with a year-on-year growth of 56% [2][30]. - The company’s earnings per share (EPS) is expected to increase from 0.12 CNY in 2023 to 0.66 CNY in 2025 [2][38]. Business Analysis - The company has shipped approximately 310 million battery units in the first half of the year, with Q2 shipments reaching 170-180 million units, a year-on-year increase of 70% [11]. - The introduction of new products, particularly the full-tab cylindrical cells, is expected to enhance competitiveness in the BBU market, with the company already beginning to ship these products [27][28]. - The LED business has shown significant recovery, contributing over 50 million CNY in profit in Q2, with expectations for continued growth [10][11]. Profitability and Growth - The company’s operating profit is projected to recover significantly, with estimates of 954 million CNY in 2025, reflecting a 60% year-on-year increase [2][37]. - The gross margin is expected to improve from 12.8% in 2023 to 21.0% in 2025, indicating enhanced profitability [38]. - The company is focusing on expanding its market share in new applications such as BBU, robotics, and low-altitude sectors, which are expected to drive future growth [7][10].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - This week, the equity market closed higher overall, with the CSI 1000 leading the way and the small - cap growth style outperforming. The bond market also trended upward, and the convertible bond market rose [1][2][6]. - Among the industries, non - ferrous metals, machinery, and national defense and military industries led the gains, while pharmaceuticals and consumer services declined [2][6][9]. - Active equity funds had an average return of 1.80%. For bond - type funds, short - term bond funds had an average return of 0.06%, medium - and long - term bond funds had an average return of 0.08%, and convertible bond funds and bond funds with equity exposure achieved positive average returns [1][2]. - This week, there were 3 new stocks listed, and no new stocks broke their issue prices on the first day of listing. The average return of sample new - stock subscription funds was 0.59%, and the new - stock subscription yield of an 800 - million - yuan account was 0.023% [2][37]. - As of August 6, 2025, the average returns of low - risk, medium - risk, and high - risk FOF funds in the sample in the past week were 0.22%, 0.37%, and 0.47% respectively [2]. - During the statistical period, equity - biased QDII and bond - type QDII funds rose by 0.34% and 0.52% on average, while index - type and other - type QDII funds fell by 0.30% and 0.45% on average. REITs funds fell by 0.31% on average this week [2]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Market Review - The equity market closed higher overall this week, with the CSI 1000 leading the gains and the small - cap growth style outperforming. As of the close, the Shanghai - Shenzhen 300 Index closed at 4105 points, up 1.23%; the Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3635 points, up 2.11%; the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11129 points, up 1.25%; and the ChiNext Index closed at 2334 points, up 0.49%. In the Hong Kong stock market, the Hang Seng Index rose 1.43%, and the Hang Seng Tech Index rose 1.17% [6]. - In terms of industry performance, non - ferrous metals, machinery, and national defense and military industries led the gains, with increases of over 5%, while pharmaceuticals and consumer services declined [9]. - As of August 8, 2025, among the 5422 stocks in the A - share market, 4041 stocks rose this week. The number of rising stocks on the Beijing Stock Exchange, ChiNext, Science and Technology Innovation Board, and Main Board were 140, 1035, 421, and 2445 respectively [12]. 3.2 Key Fund Tracking 3.2.1 Active Equity - **Fund Performance**: The average return of the full - market funds in the sample this week was 1.80%. Funds with better performance were heavily invested in industries such as automobiles and machinery. For industry - themed funds, funds in the cyclical and mid - stream manufacturing sectors had leading average returns, while those in the pharmaceutical sector lagged behind [18][20]. - **Position Estimation**: This week, the positions of ordinary stock - type and partial - stock hybrid funds both increased. Compared with the previous week, the position of ordinary stock - type funds rose by 1.06 percentage points, and that of partial - stock hybrid funds rose by 2.19 percentage points. Actively managed partial - stock funds increased their allocations to cyclical, consumer, growth, and financial sectors and reduced their allocations to stable sectors. In terms of sub - industries, the allocations to household appliances, communications, and computers increased, while those to automobiles, electronics, and petroleum and petrochemicals decreased [23]. 3.2.2 Bond - type Funds - **Bond Market Performance**: This week, the bond market trended upward. The ChinaBond Total Wealth Index closed at 246.91, up 0.1% from last week; the ChinaBond Treasury Bond Index closed at 247.9, up 0.13%; and the ChinaBond Credit Bond Index closed at 224.18, up 0.09%. The CSI Non - Pure Bond Fund Index closed at 2229.59 on Thursday, up 0.45% from last Thursday. The CSI Convertible Bond Index closed at 467.77, with a weekly increase of 2.31%, and the trading volume was 422.4 billion yuan, a change of 36.293 billion yuan from last week [25][27]. - **Fund Performance Overview**: This week, the average return of short - term bond funds was 0.06%, and the median was 0.06%; the average return of medium - and long - term bond funds was 0.08%, and the median was 0.08%. The average return of first - tier bond funds was 0.29%, and the median was 0.16%; the average return of second - tier bond funds was 0.57%, and the median was 0.44%. The average return of partial - bond hybrid funds was 0.62%, and the median was 0.53%; the average return of low - position flexible allocation funds was 0.53%, and the median was 0.38%. The average return of convertible bond funds was 2.59%, and the median was 2.52% [31][33][34][36]. 3.2.3 New - stock Subscription Funds - **New - stock Overview**: This week, 3 new stocks were listed, and 2 had inquiry and offline placement details, with a total raised capital of 1.877 billion yuan. There were no break - even stocks on the first day of listing, and the total expected入围 income was 182,500 yuan [37]. - **New - stock Subscription Yield Calculation**: Assuming participation in the offline new - stock subscription of new stocks every week and being入围, the weekly new - stock subscription yield sequence of an 800 - million - yuan account was calculated based on the winning rate of Class A investors [38]. - **Fund Company New - stock Subscription Overview**: Six fund companies with more than 2 new - stock subscription funds were selected. The weekly new - stock subscription yield of an 800 - million - yuan account this week was 0.023%. The optimal scale for weekly and annual new - stock subscription was 400 million yuan [40]. - **New - stock Subscription Fund Performance**: According to the screening method, 38 new - stock subscription funds were selected. The average return of the new - stock subscription funds in the sample this week was 0.59% [43]. 3.2.4 FOF Funds - The average returns of low - risk, medium - risk, and high - risk FOF funds in the sample in the past week were 0.22%, 0.37%, and 0.47% respectively [44]. 3.2.5 QDII Funds - During the statistical period, equity - biased QDII funds rose by 0.34% on average, and index - type QDII funds fell by 0.30% on average. Other - type QDII funds fell by 0.45% on average, and bond - type QDII funds rose by 0.52% on average [45][46]. 3.2.6 REITs Funds - This week, REITs funds fell by 0.31% on average. Among them, Huatai Zijin Baowan Logistics Warehouse REIT led the gains, rising 4.31% in the past week. Huaxia Huadian Clean Energy REIT had the highest liquidity, with a trading volume of 214.361 million yuan in the past week [47].

Group 1: CPI Analysis - In July 2025, the CPI increased by 0.4% month-on-month and remained flat year-on-year at 0.0% due to significant pressure from food prices[2] - Core CPI, excluding food and energy, rose to 0.8%, the highest in 17 months, indicating effective domestic demand policies[2] - Vegetable prices saw a significant decline due to high base effects from the previous year, while pork prices continued to drop due to weak terminal demand[2] Group 2: PPI Analysis - In July 2025, the PPI decreased by 3.6% year-on-year and by 0.2% month-on-month, marking a continued decline in the mining and raw material processing industries[2] - The coal mining and oil extraction sectors were the largest contributors to the PPI decline, with mining industries showing a year-on-year drop of 14.0%[2] - The report anticipates a slight recovery in PPI in August, projecting a year-on-year rate around -3%, influenced by high base effects from the previous year[2] Group 3: Future Outlook - The report suggests that while CPI may rise above 0 in August, energy prices remain a significant constraint on overall inflation recovery[2] - The ongoing weak demand in the mid and downstream sectors is expected to limit the positive impact of anti-involution policies on PPI[2] - The effectiveness of domestic policies in stimulating demand will be crucial for any significant recovery in PPI throughout the year[2]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report The report focuses on the performance of the ETF fund market, summarizing the performance and capital flows of the overall ETF fund market, different popular sub - type ETF funds, and innovative theme and sub - industry ETF funds in the past week (August 4 - August 8, 2025) to provide references for investors [1]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 ETF Market Overall Performance - **Market Performance**: Most A - share - focused ETFs rose this week. Defense and military industry ETFs had the largest increase, with an average increase of 5.08% for funds above a certain scale, while pharmaceutical and biological ETFs had the deepest decline, with an average decrease of 0.91% for funds above a certain scale [2][6]. - **Capital Flow**: Funds continued to flow into Hong Kong stock ETFs significantly, with a net inflow of 12.342 billion yuan throughout the week. Conversely, the most capital flowed out of science and technology innovation/growth enterprise board - related index ETFs, with a net outflow of 3.945 billion yuan throughout the week [3][8]. 3.2 Different Popular Sub - type ETF Funds Market Performance - **Stock ETF - Broad - based Index**: Different broad - based index ETFs showed various performance in terms of capital flow, weekly increase/decrease, and performance in the past month and since the beginning of the year. For example, in the super - large - cap index, the China AMC SSE 50 ETF had a weekly net capital outflow of 2.243 billion yuan and a weekly increase of 1.18% [16]. - **Stock ETF - Industry Theme**: Different industry - themed ETFs also had different performances. For instance, in the TMT sector, the Harvest SSE STAR Market Chip ETF had a weekly net capital inflow of 406 million yuan and a weekly increase of 1.32% [22]. - **Bond ETF, QDII ETF, Commodity ETF**: Each type of ETF had its own characteristics in terms of capital flow and performance. For example, the Haitong Fortune CSI Short - term Financing Bond ETF in the bond ETF category had a weekly net capital inflow of 4.023 billion yuan and a weekly increase of 0.04% [30]. 3.3 Innovative Theme and Sub - industry ETF Funds Market Performance - **TMT Innovation Theme**: The animation and gaming index had a weekly increase of 6.41% and an increase of 35.09% since the beginning of the year. The China AMC Gaming ETF, representing this index, had a weekly increase of 6.25% [34]. - **Other Themes**: Other themes such as consumer sub - industries, pharmaceutical sub - industries, new energy themes, central and state - owned enterprise themes, and stable - growth themes also had their respective performance data in terms of weekly increase/decrease and performance since the beginning of the year [35][36][37].

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods DTW Timing Model - **Model Name**: DTW Timing Model - **Model Construction Idea**: The model is based on the principle of similarity and the DTW algorithm, focusing on price and volume timing[1][5][14] - **Model Construction Process**: - The model examines the similarity between current index trends and historical trends, selecting several historical segments with high similarity as references[25] - It calculates the weighted average future price change and weighted standard deviation of the selected historical segments (weights are the inverse of the distance)[25] - Based on the average future price change and standard deviation, trading signals are generated[25] - The model uses the DTW distance algorithm instead of the Euclidean distance for similarity measurement, as DTW distance can better handle time series mismatches[27] - Improved DTW algorithms such as Sakoe-Chiba and Itakura Parallelogram are introduced to overcome the "over-bending" issue in traditional DTW algorithms[29][30][35] - **Model Evaluation**: The model has shown stable excess returns in general market conditions, although it faced some drawdowns during periods of sudden macroeconomic policy changes[16] Foreign Capital Timing Model - **Model Name**: Foreign Capital Timing Model - **Model Construction Idea**: The model is based on the divergence between foreign and domestic related assets[1][14] - **Model Construction Process**: - The model uses two foreign-listed assets related to A-shares: FTSE China A50 Index Futures (Singapore market) and Southern A50 ETF (Hong Kong market)[34] - It constructs two indicators from FTSE China A50 Index Futures: premium and price divergence, forming the FTSE China A50 Index Futures timing signal[34] - It constructs a price divergence indicator from Southern A50 ETF, forming the Southern A50 ETF timing signal[34] - The timing signals from both assets are combined to form the foreign capital timing signal[34] - **Model Evaluation**: The model has shown good performance with high annualized returns and low maximum drawdowns[20][23] Model Backtest Results DTW Timing Model - **Absolute Return**: 25.79% since November 2022[5][16] - **Excess Return**: 16.83% relative to CSI 300[5][16] - **Maximum Drawdown**: 21.32%[5][16] - **Absolute Return (2024)**: 23.98% on CSI 300[18] - **Excess Return (2024)**: 2.76%[18] - **Maximum Drawdown (2024)**: 21.36%[18] - **Win Rate (2024)**: 53.85%[18] - **Profit-Loss Ratio (2024)**: 2.93[18] Foreign Capital Timing Model - **Absolute Return (2024)**: 29.11% for long strategy[5][23] - **Maximum Drawdown (2024)**: 8.32% for long strategy[5][23] - **Annualized Return (2014-2024)**: 18.96% for long-short strategy, 14.19% for long strategy[20] - **Maximum Drawdown (2014-2024)**: 25.69% for long-short strategy, 17.27% for long strategy[20] - **Daily Win Rate (2014-2024)**: Nearly 55%[20] - **Profit-Loss Ratio (2014-2024)**: Both exceed 2.5[20]

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. 2. Core Viewpoints The report comprehensively analyzes the bond market situation through multiple indicators, showing that last week the bond market sentiment recovered slightly, while the trading activity in the secondary market decreased. The bond - fund issuance increased significantly, and there were changes in the bond - buying behavior of different institutions. The relative valuation of bonds also showed certain fluctuations [1][2]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Bond Market Sentiment - The bond market sentiment index last week was 114.8, up 0.1 from the previous value; the bond market sentiment diffusion index was 50.1%, up 1.3 percentage points from the previous value [1]. 3.2 Institutional Duration - Last Friday, the fund duration was 2.21 years, up 0.01 years from the previous Friday; the rural commercial bank duration was 3.12 years, up 0.02 years; the insurance duration was 6.93 years, down 0.01 years [1]. 3.3 Leverage Ratio - Last week, the pledged repurchase balance was 11.9 trillion yuan, up 0.5 trillion yuan from the previous value; the large - bank net lending balance was 5.0 trillion yuan, up 1.0 trillion yuan; the bond market leverage ratio was 103.8%, up 0.2 percentage points [1]. 3.4 Secondary Market Transactions - Last week, in terms of turnover rate, the 30Y Treasury bond turnover rate was 2.3%, down 1.0 percentage point; the 10Y Treasury bond turnover rate was 0.7%, down 0.2 percentage points; the 10Y China Development Bank bond turnover rate was 28.7%, down 0.5 percentage points; the ultra - long - term credit bond turnover rate was 0.38%, down 0.06 percentage points [1]. 3.5 Institutional Allocation Power - Last week, the newly issued bond - fund shares were 25.1 billion yuan, up 22 billion yuan from the previous value. The stock market risk premium was 1.17%, up 0.02 percentage points; the US dollar index was 98.4, down 0.9. The rural commercial bank bond - allocation index was - 33.3%, up 19.3 percentage points; the insurance bond - allocation index was 50.1%, down 21.4 percentage points; the money - market fund bond - allocation index was 30.1%, down 16.1 percentage points; the insurance's allocation index for Tier 2 and perpetual bonds was - 10.2%, down 18.8 percentage points [2]. 3.6 Primary Market Subscription - Last week, the full - field multiple of Treasury bonds decreased by 1.2 times to 3.1 times, the full - field multiple of local government bonds decreased by 0.4 times to 23.3 times, and the full - field multiple of China Development Bank bonds was 3.5 times, remaining the same as the previous value [2]. 3.7 Relative Valuation - Last week, the spread between 10 - year China Development Bank bonds and Treasury bonds widened by 2.0bp to 8.3bp, the spread between 30 - year and 10 - year Treasury bonds widened by 1.4bp to 25.7bp, the spread between old and new 10 - year China Development Bank bonds narrowed by 0.9bp to 1.2bp, and the spread between 10 - year local government bonds and Treasury bonds widened by 2.1bp to 12.5bp [2].

Domestic Policy Focus: Beijing Real Estate Policy Relaxation - On August 8, Beijing issued a notice to further optimize and adjust real estate policies, leading to a relaxation of restrictions. Specifically, the number of properties that can be purchased outside the Fifth Ring Road has been uncapped, and significant upgrades to the housing provident fund policies have been made [5][9][10] - The adjustments to the housing provident fund include changes in the recognition standards for housing purchases, an increase in the maximum loan amount for second homes from 6 million yuan to 10 million yuan, and a unified minimum down payment ratio of 30% regardless of location [10][11] - The relaxation of policies in Beijing may accelerate similar adjustments in other first-tier cities, indicating a broader trend in real estate policy easing across major urban areas [5][8] Financial Support for New Industrialization - On August 5, multiple departments, including the central bank and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, jointly issued guidelines to support new industrialization, with a focus on mid-term planning goals aimed at establishing a mature financial support system for manufacturing by 2027 [11][12] - Key industries highlighted for support include semiconductors, machinery, computers, and medical devices, with various financial tools such as bank loans, corporate bonds, and capital market financing being utilized to support these sectors [11][12][13] - The policy emphasizes the importance of financing for emerging industries, including new-generation information technology and smart connected vehicles, which are expected to benefit from increased access to capital markets [12][13] Consumer Loan Interest Subsidy Policy - The State Council, led by Premier Li Qiang, has initiated a consumer loan interest subsidy policy aimed at reducing credit costs for residents and enhancing market vitality. This policy is expected to be implemented based on successful models from regions like Sichuan and Chongqing, with a potential interest subsidy rate of around 1.5% [14][15] - The subsidy may include limits on the maximum amount per application and restrictions on the number of applications per individual, ensuring targeted support for consumer spending [14][15] Overseas Policy Focus: Tariff Updates - Recent developments in tariffs include the U.S. imposing an additional 25% tariff on Indian purchases of Russian oil, raising India's total import tariffs to 50%, effective August 27 [20][21] - Japan has received a reduction in effective tariff rates on most goods, with the U.S. modifying its administrative order to set a maximum tariff rate of 15% on Japanese products, which will not be added to existing tariffs [20][21] - In the semiconductor sector, President Trump has threatened a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors and chips, excluding those produced in the U.S., while drug imports could face tariffs as high as 250% in the future [21][22]

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information about the industry investment rating in the report. 2. Core View of the Report The report focuses on the performance of the quantitative fund market, summarizing the performance of major indices and quantitative funds in the past week, the overall performance and distribution of different types of public - offering quantitative funds, and the top - performing quantitative funds in the week from August 4th to August 8th, 2025, for investors' reference. During this period, the A - share market rose, and quantitative funds showed good performance [1][2]. 3. Summary by Directory I. Performance of Major Indices and Quantitative Funds in the Past Week - A - shares continued to rise, with the weekly returns of the CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 being 2.51%, 1.78%, and 1.23% respectively [3][6]. - Quantitative funds performed well. Active quantitative funds rose 1.88%, market - neutral funds rose 0.29%, and all types of index - enhanced funds recorded positive returns. In terms of excess returns, CSI 300 index - enhanced, CSI 500 index - enhanced, and other index - enhanced funds achieved positive excess returns of 0.20%, 0.04%, and 0.07% respectively, while CSI 1000 index - enhanced funds underperformed the index [4][9]. II. Performance of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.44%, the excess return was 0.20%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.15%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.13% [14]. - **CSI 500 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.81%, the excess return was 0.04%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.37%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.29% [14]. - **CSI 1000 Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 2.36%, the excess return was - 0.15%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.39%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.47% [15]. - **Other Index - Enhanced Funds**: The weekly return was 1.49%, the excess return was 0.07%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.59%, and the excess maximum drawdown was - 0.26% [15]. - **Active Quantitative Funds**: The weekly return was 1.88%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.37%, and the return dispersion was 1.09% [16]. - **Market - Neutral Funds**: The weekly return was 0.29%, the maximum drawdown was - 0.11%, and the return dispersion was 0.45% [16]. III. Performance Distribution of Different Types of Public - Offering Quantitative Funds The report presents the performance trends of different types of public - offering quantitative funds in the past six months, as well as the performance distribution in the past week and the past year. Index - enhanced funds show the performance of excess returns [17]. IV. Top - Performing Public - Offering Quantitative Funds - **CSI 300 Index - Enhanced**: Funds such as Anxin Quantitative Selection CSI 300 Index Enhancement and Zhongou CSI 300 Quantitative Index Enhancement performed well in the past week [30]. - **CSI 500 Index - Enhanced**: Funds like Guotai CSI 500 Index Enhancement and Huian CSI 500 Enhancement had good performance [31]. - **CSI 1000 Index - Enhanced**: Funds including Guolianan CSI 1000 Index Enhancement and Penghua CSI 1000 Enhanced Strategy ETF showed good results [32]. - **Other Index - Enhanced**: Funds such as Great Wall GEM Index Enhancement and Fuguocheng GEM Enhanced Strategy ETF performed well [33]. - **Active Quantitative**: Funds like Changxin National Defense and Military Industry and Huian Quantitative Pioneer had high returns [34]. - **Market - Neutral**: Funds such as Zhongyou Absolute Return Strategy and Southern Absolute Return Strategy performed well [35].