Group 1 - The focus of the brokerage strategy discussions this week is on the upcoming trade agreement progress and the sustainability of the "anti-involution" sector [1][2] - The Huaxi strategy team indicates that the core pricing in the global market is centered around the trade agreement progress on July 9, with potential tariff extensions being a negotiation tactic [1][3] - The A-share market is expected to maintain an upward trend, with two main lines of focus: positive mid-term performance expectations in sectors like wind power, thermal power, and robotics, and the potential for domestic chains to catch up following Nvidia's overseas breakthroughs [1][3] Group 2 - The Dongfang strategy team notes that the market previously viewed the July 9 tariff as a negligible short-term risk, but it may escalate into a core issue next week, leading to a volatile market [1][3] - The Zhongyin strategy team emphasizes that the current liquidity environment supports the market, and as the third quarter progresses, domestic demand expectations may improve if tariff policies do not experience unexpected fluctuations [1][3] - The Xuch team's analysis suggests that "expectation management" is a key tool in the "anti-involution" policy, with limited space for further capacity clearance in traditional cyclical industries like coal and steel due to already high industry concentration [2][4] Group 3 - The market is currently in a state of fluctuation, with the potential for increased volatility in the coming weeks due to the expiration of the 90-day tariff grace period and the implications of the "Great Beautiful Act" [5] - The overall sentiment in the A-share market is that the liquidity environment remains a primary support factor, with expectations for recovery in domestic demand as price pressures ease and policies are implemented [5] - The current cycle of capacity reduction is crucial, but its short-term impact on profitability may be limited if demand does not show signs of recovery [4][5]

Group 1: Overview of the "Beautiful Bill" - The "Beautiful Bill" is expected to expand the total deficit by approximately $4.1 trillion, primarily continuing existing policies[1] - The bill includes tax cuts, increased spending on immigration enforcement, expanded defense spending, and cuts to welfare and renewable energy subsidies[1] - The overall deficit scale ranks among the highest since World War II, second only to the 1981 Reagan tax cuts when measured as a percentage of GDP[1] Group 2: Economic Effects - The bill is projected to moderately boost U.S. GDP growth by an average of 0.1 percentage points annually from 2025 to 2034, with the most significant impact occurring between 2026 and 2028, potentially reaching 0.8 percentage points[2] - The lowest 10% of income households may see a 3.9% decrease in income due to cuts in medical assistance and SNAP benefits, while the highest 10% could experience an average income increase of 2.3%[2] - Traditional and capital-intensive industries are expected to benefit, while the renewable energy and electric vehicle sectors may suffer due to reduced tax credits[2] Group 3: U.S. Treasury Bond Liquidity - The supply of U.S. Treasury bonds is expected to remain stable, with manageable macroeconomic conditions, although there may still be upward pressure on term premiums[3] - The projected increase in the deficit rate for next year is around 0.7%, potentially reaching approximately 7%[3] - The federal government's leverage ratio is anticipated to reach 103% by 2026 and 116% by 2030, but the risk of a sovereign debt crisis remains low[3] Group 4: Market Reactions and Asset Performance - Major U.S. stock indices rose collectively, with the S&P 500 increasing by 1.6% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average by 2.3%[4] - The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose by 6 basis points to 4.4%, while the dollar index fell by 0.3% to 96.99[4] - The upcoming expiration of tariff exemptions raises concerns about potential tariff escalations, with about 20 countries facing the possibility of reinstated tariffs[4]

Group 1: Impact of "Anti-Inner-Loop" Policy on the Market - The "Anti-Inner-Loop" policy has gained significant attention from the central government, particularly in industries facing overcapacity, as highlighted in the Central Financial Committee meeting on July 1, 2025 [2][11] - Following the policy announcement, sectors such as photovoltaic and cement have taken measures to reduce production and optimize industry structure, leading to a strong market response with noticeable capital inflow [2][11] - The policy aims to enhance supply structure, stabilize market expectations, and improve overall industry efficiency and competitiveness [11][12] Group 2: Investment Recommendations - The current market is in a volatile phase, with investment hotspots concentrated in technology, military industry, and state-owned enterprises, benefiting from stable policies and capital inflow from U.S. markets [5][16] - The technology sector is expected to be a key focus in July, supported by reduced policy uncertainty and domestic planning emphasizing technology [16][17] - The military sector is anticipated to perform well due to increased defense budgets and upcoming high-profile military events [17] - State-owned enterprises and public utilities are seen as having good allocation value in the third quarter, given the weakening internal dynamics of real estate and strict regulatory measures [18] Group 3: Market Overview and Trends - The market has shown a trend of oscillating upward, with major indices such as the Wind All A, CSI 300, and CSI 2000 rising by 1.22%, 1.54%, and 0.59% respectively [8][21] - The steel, banking, and building materials sectors have led the market, indicating a recovery in activity levels [21][23] - The average turnover rate for the entire market has increased, reflecting a rise in trading activity [27][28]

- The report highlights the "WanDe Micro Cap Index" as a dynamic strategy index rather than a static one, with its returns driven by micro-cap style and daily rebalancing that generates a "reversal effect"[12] - The reversal effect is attributed to the liquidity spillover effect, which has been amplified by the shift in market participant structure since 2021, where individual investors gained pricing power over institutional investors, favoring smaller-cap stocks[12] - The report suggests that the trading heat for small-cap stocks is likely to continue in July, supported by marginal optimism in overseas markets and eased liquidity shocks from U.S. Treasury issuance[12] - The "Barra Style Factors" analysis indicates positive returns for fundamental-related factors, with a preference for value over growth, particularly BP value assets[23] - Transaction-related factors such as short-term momentum, long-term reversal, and low-volatility stocks are expected to deliver excess returns[23] - The report notes a shift in market preference from extreme small-cap styles to larger-cap styles, as evidenced by the positive returns of the size factor and the expanded drawdown of the non-linear size factor[23] - The weekly performance of style factors includes metrics such as turnover (0.2%), financial leverage (0.2%), earnings volatility (0.2%), and BP value (0.2%), among others[24] - Negative returns are observed for non-linear size (-0.2%) and volatility (-0.3%), indicating a divergence in market preferences[24]

投资策略 | 定期报告 短期攻势暂缓，中期升势未变 策略周报 20250706 研究结论 ⚫ 全球市场下周或延续震荡 全球降息交易暂歇，下周延续震荡预期：前一周全球市场普涨系交易 9 月的美联储 降息预期，本周全球主要市场除巴西、美国和中国上涨外，整体出现震荡态势，降 息交易暂歇。我们认为美国市场本周全面上涨，并不是交易降息预期，主要是交易 政策不确定性下降，"大而美"法案成功落地短期降低了市场对特朗普政府执政能 力的担心，但这一利好已经落地，政策实际落地效果仍然具有不确定性。美国最新 就业数据公布后，利率期货交易员认为美国 7 月降息预期已微乎其微，9 月降息概率 也从 98%下降到 80%以下。综上我们认为全球市场的上涨或告一段落，下周延续震 荡预期。 风险事件乐观定价充分，预期差逆转压制上涨动力：上周中美推进"伦敦框架" （中方审批管制物项出口、美方松绑限制），市场或因此短期下调了风险评价。但 当前定价或已充分反映对关税战的乐观预期，市场可能会开始担心 9 日事件落地结 果难超预期。随着交易焦点转向 7 月 9 日关税休战到期， 风险评价预期短升将压制 全球市场反弹动能。 ⚫ A 股短期攻势或暂缓，关税 ...

Group 1 - The market is experiencing an upward shift in the oscillation center, characterized by "top and bottom" dynamics, with a positive outlook for effective index breakthroughs due to monthly momentum reversal and rising trading volume [2][12][13] - Profitability is still in a bottoming phase, with expectations that the profit bottom will not arrive before the end of Q3, limiting the elasticity of the current profit cycle [2][13] - Valuation support is provided by government-backed credit policies, with a focus on stable growth and market stabilization measures [2][13] Group 2 - Structural opportunities are emphasized, particularly in "Deep Sea Technology" and "Newly Listed Stocks," alongside existing themes like "Delta G Consumption" and "Self-Controlled Technology" [3][23] - "Deep Sea Technology" is positioned as a strong thematic opportunity for the second half of the year, aligning with national strategic priorities and policies aimed at enhancing marine economic development [4][24][29] - The deep sea technology industry chain is extensive, covering upstream materials, midstream manufacturing, and downstream resource utilization, indicating a comprehensive growth potential [4][32] Group 3 - Newly listed stocks have regained prominence since September 2024, with a significant upward trend observed in their performance, correlating closely with improvements in economic confidence [5][34] - The performance of newly listed stocks is highly correlated with macroeconomic indicators, suggesting that as economic expectations improve, these stocks are likely to outperform the market [5][38] - A new index, the "Open Source Newly Listed Stock Index," has been created to better track and represent the performance of newly listed stocks, expanding the criteria to include stocks listed for up to six years [5][44] Group 4 - Current investment strategy emphasizes diversification across sectors, focusing on "Delta G Consumption," "Self-Controlled Technology," "Stable Dividends," and "Gold" [6][50] - Specific sector recommendations include domestic consumption, technology growth, cost improvement sectors, and structural opportunities in exports, particularly to Europe [6][50] - The strategy aims to capture the greatest expected differences and domestic certainties while avoiding over-concentration in any single sector [6][50]

Core Insights - The current market environment shows similarities to late 2014, with investors in Hong Kong stocks, small-cap stocks, and industry sectors experiencing some profit effects, leading to a mild recovery in new product launches [1] - Non-financial sector profit expectations are nearing a bottom, with improved investor patience, although confidence still needs to be restored [1] - Policies aimed at reducing competition and boosting domestic demand are clear objectives, with specific policy implementations and adjustments expected soon, potentially showcased in the "14th Five-Year Plan" [1] Investment Strategies - The report maintains three strategic focuses for the mid-year reporting season: 1. Industries with strong industrial trend characteristics, focusing on AI and innovative pharmaceuticals [1] 2. Industries driven by performance and valuation matching, focusing on North American computing chains in telecommunications and electronics, as well as non-ferrous metals and gaming [1] 3. Industries with thematic and speculative characteristics, particularly related to military industry and new energy linked to reducing competition [1] - Overall, the rotation among non-ferrous metals, AI hardware, innovative pharmaceuticals, gaming, and military industries is expected to be the main theme during the mid-year reporting season [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the critical point of capitalism, indicating that the "buying time" strategy is nearing its limits due to the disconnection between debt repayment capacity and economic growth potential [1] - The U.S. national debt has surpassed $37 trillion since the 2008 financial crisis, with ongoing debates about the debt ceiling becoming a political tool, suggesting that the "myth of American economic invincibility" is at risk of collapse [2] - The trend of de-globalization has been ongoing since the 2008 financial crisis, indicating a shift in governance that reflects a desperate response to systemic failures of neoliberalism [5][6] Group 2 - The article highlights the transformation of the "tax state" into a "debt state," where the burden of public spending is shifted to lower-income groups, leading to increased wealth inequality [7] - The ongoing rise in public debt and the inability of Western democracies to maintain legitimacy is illustrated by the rise of right-wing populism, particularly in countries that have ceded some sovereignty to the EU [10] - The EU's tightening policies have stripped member states of their economic sovereignty, revealing a governance vacuum in the face of cross-border capital flows [9]

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods Model Name: Wind All A Index Timing System - **Model Construction Idea**: The model aims to distinguish the overall market environment by analyzing the distance between long-term and short-term moving averages of the Wind All A Index[1][10][16] - **Model Construction Process**: - Define the long-term moving average (120-day) and short-term moving average (20-day) of the Wind All A Index[1][10] - Calculate the distance between the two moving averages: $$ \text{Distance} = \frac{\text{Short-term MA} - \text{Long-term MA}}{\text{Long-term MA}} $$ where the short-term MA is the 20-day moving average and the long-term MA is the 120-day moving average[1][10] - Monitor the distance value to determine market conditions. If the distance exceeds 3%, it signals a change from a volatile to an upward trend[1][10][16] - **Model Evaluation**: The model is effective in identifying market trends and providing signals for adjusting positions[1][10][16] Model Name: Industry Allocation Model - **Model Construction Idea**: The model recommends industry sectors based on medium-term perspectives and current market trends[2][4][11] - **Model Construction Process**: - Analyze the performance and trends of various industry sectors[2][4][11] - Identify sectors with potential for reversal or growth, such as distressed reversal sectors, innovative drugs in Hong Kong stocks, and photovoltaic sectors benefiting from anti-involution[2][4][11] - Use the TWO BETA model to recommend technology sectors, focusing on military and communication industries[2][4][11] - **Model Evaluation**: The model provides targeted industry recommendations based on current market conditions and trends[2][4][11] Model Name: Position Management Model - **Model Construction Idea**: The model manages stock positions based on valuation indicators and short-term market trends[3][12] - **Model Construction Process**: - Evaluate the overall PE and PB ratios of the Wind All A Index[3][12] - Determine the stock position based on the valuation levels and short-term market trends. For example, with the Wind All A Index at a medium PE level (70th percentile) and a low PB level (30th percentile), the recommended position is 60%[3][12] - **Model Evaluation**: The model helps in managing stock positions effectively by considering valuation levels and market trends[3][12] Model Backtest Results Wind All A Index Timing System - **Distance between Moving Averages**: 2.52%[1][10][16] Industry Allocation Model - **Recommended Sectors**: Distressed reversal sectors, innovative drugs in Hong Kong stocks, photovoltaic sectors, technology sectors (military and communication), A-share banks, and gold stocks[2][4][11] Position Management Model - **Recommended Position**: 60%[3][12]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the passage of the "Big and Beautiful Act," which significantly increases U.S. military spending to $1 trillion, raising questions about its effectiveness in revitalizing the military [1][3][5] - The act was passed with a narrow margin in both the Senate and House, reflecting significant controversy and debate surrounding its implications for military funding and strategy [3][5][6] - The act allocates $156.2 billion specifically for new military projects, with a total military budget approaching $960 billion for the upcoming fiscal year [5][6][7] Group 2 - The funding breakdown includes $70 billion for improving military personnel quality of life, $29.1 billion for shipbuilding, and $24 billion for missile defense systems, among other allocations [7][8] - The military's current procurement strategy is under scrutiny, as the number of weapons being purchased is decreasing despite rising budgets, indicating potential inefficiencies [6][22] - The article highlights a shift in military strategy under the Trump administration, moving away from previous policies and focusing on more pragmatic military projects [19][21][22] Group 3 - The article discusses China's naval advancements, particularly the recent dual aircraft carrier exercises, marking a significant development in naval capabilities and strategy [23][24][27] - The performance of China's aircraft carriers, particularly in terms of sortie rates, is compared favorably to U.S. naval operations, indicating a shift in naval power dynamics [29][30][34] - The article emphasizes the importance of these developments in the context of U.S.-China military competition, suggesting that the era of U.S. naval dominance is being challenged [41][42]