Investment Rating - The industry rating is "Positive" [1] Core Viewpoints - The report indicates that the negative impact from the mid-year report has been fully absorbed, and the fundamentals of the coal industry remain upward [1] - The coal sector has underperformed the CSI 300 index, with a decline of 0.74% compared to a 1.09% increase in the index, resulting in a relative underperformance of 1.83 percentage points [2] - Key monitored enterprises reported an average daily coal sales volume of 7.31 million tons, which is a week-on-week increase of 2.8% and a year-on-year increase of 4.7% [2] - The report highlights a decrease in coal inventory by 4% week-on-week, while year-on-year inventory has increased by 19.8% [2] Summary by Sections Coal Market Performance - The coal sector saw 6 stocks rise and 31 stocks fall during the week, with ST Dazhou showing the highest increase of 4.89% [2] - The average daily sales of thermal coal increased by 3.2% week-on-week, while coking coal sales rose by 1.9% [2] Price Trends - As of July 18, 2025, the price index for thermal coal (Q5500K) in the Bohai Rim was 663 RMB/ton, reflecting a week-on-week increase of 0.15% [3] - The price of coking coal at Jing Tang Port was 1420 RMB/ton, with a week-on-week increase of 8.4% [4] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests that social inventory continues to decline, and current demand remains promising, with domestic power plants showing a significant increase in daily coal consumption [6] - The report recommends focusing on high-dividend thermal coal companies and coking coal companies that are experiencing turnaround potential, such as China Shenhua, Shaanxi Coal, and others [6]

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: Index Enhancement Strategy (80% Component Constraint) **Model Construction Idea**: The model aims to replicate the performance of typical index enhancement products by adjusting the distribution of components across different market capitalization domains[4][33][34] **Model Construction Process**: 1. The model constrains the component weight to 80% while adjusting the allocation in micro-cap stocks. 2. Specific constraints include: - Industry exposure: 0.1% - Weight cap for CSI 2000 components: 0.2% - Weight cap for micro-cap stocks: 0.1% - Monthly rebalancing frequency 3. Performance metrics such as excess return, tracking error, IR, and maximum drawdown are calculated for different micro-cap allocations (0%, 5%, 10%)[34][35] **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates that higher micro-cap allocations can enhance excess returns, albeit with slightly increased tracking error and drawdown[35] - **Model Name**: Index Enhancement Strategy (Relaxed Component Constraint) **Model Construction Idea**: This model explores the impact of relaxing the component weight constraint to 40% while varying micro-cap allocations and market capitalization exposures[33][39] **Model Construction Process**: 1. The component weight constraint is relaxed to 40%, and micro-cap allocations are adjusted (0%, 10%, 20%). 2. Additional constraints include: - Industry exposure: 0.1% - Weight cap for CSI 2000 components: 0.2% - Weight cap for micro-cap stocks: 0.1% - Monthly rebalancing frequency 3. Performance metrics such as excess return, tracking error, IR, and maximum drawdown are calculated for different scenarios[39][40] **Model Evaluation**: Relaxing the component constraint significantly improves excess returns, especially with higher micro-cap allocations, though it introduces higher tracking error and drawdown risks[40] Model Backtesting Results - **Index Enhancement Strategy (80% Component Constraint)**: - CSI 300 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 7.97%, Tracking Error: 3.34%, IR: 5.38, Max Drawdown: -1.16% - CSI 300 (5% micro-cap): Excess Return: 8.52%, Tracking Error: 3.45%, IR: 5.58, Max Drawdown: -1.19% - CSI 300 (10% micro-cap): Excess Return: 8.70%, Tracking Error: 3.57%, IR: 5.51, Max Drawdown: -1.33% - CSI 500 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 7.55%, Tracking Error: 3.87%, IR: 4.38, Max Drawdown: -1.52% - CSI 500 (5% micro-cap): Excess Return: 8.23%, Tracking Error: 3.88%, IR: 4.78, Max Drawdown: -1.38% - CSI 500 (10% micro-cap): Excess Return: 9.20%, Tracking Error: 3.98%, IR: 5.24, Max Drawdown: -1.39% - CSI 1000 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 10.12%, Tracking Error: 4.28%, IR: 5.40, Max Drawdown: -1.50% - CSI 1000 (5% micro-cap): Excess Return: 9.76%, Tracking Error: 4.31%, IR: 5.16, Max Drawdown: -1.69% - CSI 1000 (10% micro-cap): Excess Return: 9.76%, Tracking Error: 4.31%, IR: 5.16, Max Drawdown: -1.69%[35] - **Index Enhancement Strategy (Relaxed Component Constraint)**: - CSI 300 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 10.87%, Tracking Error: 4.35%, IR: 5.73, Max Drawdown: -1.29% - CSI 300 (10% micro-cap): Excess Return: 13.96%, Tracking Error: 7.01%, IR: 4.64, Max Drawdown: -3.02% - CSI 500 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 10.25%, Tracking Error: 6.65%, IR: 3.52, Max Drawdown: -2.19% - CSI 500 (20% micro-cap): Excess Return: 17.08%, Tracking Error: 7.98%, IR: 5.07, Max Drawdown: -2.43% - CSI 1000 (0% micro-cap): Excess Return: 10.84%, Tracking Error: 6.24%, IR: 3.98, Max Drawdown: -1.54% - CSI 1000 (20% micro-cap): Excess Return: 16.81%, Tracking Error: 7.38%, IR: 5.38, Max Drawdown: -2.04%[40] Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: Market Capitalization (Size) **Factor Construction Idea**: Market capitalization is used as a linear factor to segment stocks into deciles, with smaller-cap stocks expected to deliver higher excess returns[19][22] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Divide the market into 10 deciles based on market capitalization. 2. Calculate the excess return for each decile. 3. Analyze the trend of excess returns across deciles[22] **Factor Evaluation**: The smallest decile (G01) delivers the highest excess return (22.4%), while returns decrease progressively with increasing market capitalization[22] - **Factor Name**: Mid-Cap (Nonlinear Size) **Factor Construction Idea**: Mid-cap is modeled as a cubic function to capture the performance of stocks outside the large-cap and small-cap domains[2][25] **Factor Construction Process**: 1. Define mid-cap stocks using a cubic function of market capitalization. 2. Analyze the overlap between mid-cap and market capitalization groups. 3. Evaluate the excess return of mid-cap groups[25][26] **Factor Evaluation**: Mid-cap stocks exhibit significant overlap with small-cap stocks, and the smallest mid-cap group (G01) delivers high excess returns (21.6%)[22][25] Factor Backtesting Results - **Market Capitalization (Size)**: - G01: 22.4%, G02: 15.0%, G03: 22.6%, G04: 20.4%, G05: 13.6%, G06: 13.2%, G07: 10.9%, G08: 6.9%, G09: 3.9%, G10: -5.6%[22] - **Mid-Cap (Nonlinear Size)**: - G01: 21.6%, G02: 13.7%, G03: -0.5%, G04: 0.0%, G05: 1.5%, G06: 0.8%, G07: 0.5%, G08: -2.1%, G09: -0.2%, G10: -2.7%[22]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index rose by 0.4%, while the CSI 300 increased by 0.7%, the STAR Market 50 by 0.8%, the CSI 1000 by 1.1%, and the ChiNext Index by 1.8%. The Hang Seng Index decreased by 0.1% [5] - The best-performing sectors included defense and military (+2.7%), communication (+2.4%), electronics (+2.2%), pharmaceutical and biological (+1.8%), and steel (+1.4%). The worst-performing sectors were banking (-0.4%), transportation (-0.4%), environmental protection (-0.3%), public utilities (-0.2%), and construction decoration (-0.2%) [5] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets was 15,394 billion, with a net inflow of 1.855 billion Hong Kong dollars from southbound funds [5] Important Recommendations Oriental Tower (002545) - The recommendation logic is based on the sustained high prosperity of global potash fertilizer, with the company actively expanding production, which is expected to lead to record-breaking performance [6] - Revenue projections for 2025-2027 are 4,417 million, 4,944 million, and 5,864 million, with growth rates of 5.26%, 11.93%, and 18.61% respectively. Net profit is projected at 1,082.6 million, 1,198.9 million, and 1,540.31 million, with growth rates of 91.86%, 10.74%, and 28.48% respectively [6] - Recent price increases in potash fertilizer are seen as a catalyst for growth [6] Source Pet (001222) - The recommendation logic highlights the company's leadership in pet leashes and the rapid growth of its self-owned brand, which is expected to open up valuation space [7] - Revenue projections for 2025-2027 are 1,671 million, 2,067 million, and 2,458 million, with growth rates of 27.59%, 23.66%, and 18.93% respectively. Net profit is projected at 166 million, 209 million, and 251 million, with growth rates of 1.26%, 25.45%, and 20.43% respectively [7] - The growth of the OEM business and the acceleration of the self-owned brand are seen as key drivers [7] Important Insights Strategy Report - The core viewpoint indicates that since 2018, only a few assets have outperformed gold, including certain cryptocurrencies and specific sectors like precious metals and small-cap stocks [8] - The report suggests that while some assets may temporarily outperform gold, maintaining that performance over the long term is challenging, thus emphasizing gold's long-term allocation value [8] - The report recommends focusing on high-dividend stocks and emerging technology sectors for long-term investments, while short-term attention should be on financial and technology sectors [9] Bond Market Research - The issuance of land reserve bonds is expected to have limited benefits for state-owned and private enterprises, primarily improving liquidity for urban investment platforms [10] - The report emphasizes a more granular analysis at the provincial level for potential interest rate spread opportunities [10] Important Comments Chalk (02469) - The introduction of the AI test preparation system is expected to help the company regain market share and enhance profits, marking a pivotal moment for growth [12] - Revenue forecasts for 2025-2027 are 2,805 million, 2,914 million, and 3,027 million, with net profit projections of 391 million, 434 million, and 473 million, reflecting growth rates of 7.94%, 10.89%, and 9.16% respectively [12] - The AI product's competitive pricing and market share recovery are seen as critical catalysts for future profitability [13]

证券研究报告 合规时代开启，全球竞赛加速 ——稳定币行业深度报告 行业评级：看好 2025 年 7 月 17 日 分析师 刘雯蜀 分析师 童非 研究助理 张致远 邮箱 liuwenshu03@stocke.com.cn 邮箱 tongfei01@stocke.com.cn 邮箱 zhangzhiyuan@stocke.com.cn 证书编号 S1230523020002 证书编号 S1230524050005 摘要 2 1、稳定币：币值稳定的数字货币 • 稳定币是锚定法币、商品或加密资产的加密数字货币，通过足额抵押或算法调节供应量维持价值稳定。相较传统支付，稳定币依托区块链实现点 对点实时清算，交易成本低（如币安$ENA合约资金费率仅为0.25%，2023 Q3全球平均汇款成本为6.18%）、高效（只需几秒到几分钟内，传统 时间需3-5天）、门槛低（稳定币最低只需几美元即可转账）。稳定币已广泛用于交易撮合、DeFi、供应链金融及跨境支付，成为数字经济生态的 重要基石。 2、核心催化：香港《稳定币条例》8月1日实施，美国推进GENIUS法案 95% • 2025年6月6日，香港特区政府在宪报发布公告，指定202 ...

Investment Rating - The industry rating is "Positive" (maintained) [6] Core Viewpoints - The non-bank financial sector is expected to continue its positive performance in H1 2025, with a narrowing of performance differentiation among insurance companies. The average growth rate of new business value (NBV) for life insurance is projected at 34.1%, and net profit is expected to improve overall, with the securities industry net profit anticipated to grow by 46.4% [1][4] Summary by Sections Insurance Industry Performance Outlook - For H1 2025, major listed insurance companies are expected to see a continued rapid increase in NBV, with an average growth rate of 34.1%. Specific growth rates are projected as follows: New China Life (45.9%) > Ping An (41.8%) > China Pacific Insurance (32.7%) > China Life (16.1%) [2] - Factors driving this growth include lower preset interest rates compared to the same period last year, a decrease in expense ratios due to regulatory requirements, and an optimized business structure focusing on increasing regular premium products while reducing single premium business [2] - The comprehensive cost ratio (COR) for property insurance is expected to improve by 1.4 percentage points to 95.4% due to a normal state of operations compared to the previous year's extreme weather events [3] - Overall net profit for insurance companies is expected to improve, driven by increased investment income, with the equity market performing better than the previous year [3] Securities Industry Performance Outlook - The securities industry is projected to see a net profit growth of 46.4% year-on-year for H1 2025. The brokerage business is expected to benefit from active market trading, with daily average stock fund turnover reaching 1.5 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 57% [4] - The investment banking sector is expected to see significant growth, with equity underwriting volumes increasing over 13 times year-on-year, driven by refinancing activities [4] - Asset management business is projected to see a slight decline in net income due to decreased management fees, despite a small year-on-year increase in public fund scale [4][5] - The credit business is expected to see a decline in net income due to pressure on interest margins, despite a year-on-year increase in average margin financing balances [5] - Investment income is expected to grow by 32% year-on-year, supported by a recovering equity and bond market [8] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests a positive outlook for the non-bank sector in the short term, with both numerator and denominator factors aligning for upward momentum. In the medium to long term, continued policy support and deepening reforms are expected to enhance the strategic allocation value of the sector, which is currently undervalued [9] - Specific stock recommendations include New China Life, China Life Insurance, China Pacific Insurance, GF Securities, Xiangcai Securities, Dongfang Wealth, Guiding Compass, Lianlian Digital, and OSL Group [9]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is "Buy" [4] Core Insights - The main brand of the company shows steady growth, with a low single-digit increase in revenue for Q2 2025, while Saucony's revenue grew by over 20% year-on-year, with a strategic adjustment in e-commerce channels leading to a reduction in low-priced products and tighter discounts [1][2] - The company expects Saucony's revenue to grow by 30-40% for the full year, maintaining its guidance despite a slowdown in Q2 due to strategic adjustments [2] - The Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) strategy will officially start in Q4 2025, aiming to optimize retail structure and improve operational efficiency [2] Financial Summary - The projected revenue for 2025 is approximately 14.39 billion, with a year-on-year growth of 6% [4] - The expected net profit for 2025 is around 1.37 billion, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 10.92% [4] - The earnings per share (EPS) is projected to be 0.50 yuan for 2025, with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 9.86 [4]

Market Overview - On July 16, the Shanghai Composite Index decreased by 0.03%, the CSI 300 fell by 0.3%, the STAR 50 rose by 0.14%, the CSI 1000 increased by 0.3%, the ChiNext Index dropped by 0.22%, and the Hang Seng Index declined by 0.29% [4] - The best-performing industries on July 16 were social services (+1.13%), automotive (+1.07%), pharmaceutical and biotechnology (+0.95%), light industry manufacturing (+0.94%), and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (+0.85%). The worst-performing industries were steel (-1.28%), banking (-0.74%), non-ferrous metals (-0.45%), non-bank financials (-0.43%), and construction decoration (-0.42%) [4] - The total trading volume of the A-share market on July 16 was 14,617.34 billion yuan, with a net inflow of 1.603 billion Hong Kong dollars from southbound funds [4] Key Insights - The macroeconomic research indicates that with the gradual implementation of tariffs, external demand is expected to weaken, signaling an approaching downturn in exports. Attention is drawn to the impact of tariff conflicts on companies establishing overseas warehouses for cross-border stockpiling, which may disrupt export rhythms [5] - The macroeconomic deep report highlights that the economic recovery in June shows a good momentum, with the actual GDP growth in the second quarter at 5.2%. The growth rate of industrial added value above designated size in June increased by 6.8% year-on-year, indicating a significant divergence between supply and demand [6]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company [5] Core Views - The company is expected to achieve strong revenue growth in 25H1, with a forecasted revenue of 60.13 billion, representing an 18% year-on-year increase, outperforming market expectations [1] - Profit is projected to decline to between 4.43 billion and 5.41 billion, a decrease of 21% to 35% year-on-year, with an average estimate of 4.92 billion, indicating a significant narrowing of the profit decline in Q2 [1][2] - The decline in profit is attributed to increased incentive costs, marketing investments, and legal service fees, with adjusted net profit expected to be between 6.88 billion and 7.87 billion, reflecting a year-on-year change of -9% to +4% [2] Revenue Insights - The company's revenue from vaping products has shown resilience due to regulatory improvements, with all products being compliant [3] - The implementation of bans on disposable e-cigarettes in various regions, including the UK and New Zealand, has led to a shift towards open and refillable e-cigarettes, benefiting the company's sales [3] Future Outlook - The recent trial sales of HNB products in Japan have received positive feedback, with expectations for significant market share growth as the product is set for nationwide launch on September 1 [4] - The pricing strategy for Glo Hilo in Japan has been adjusted to enhance supply chain value distribution, indicating a strong competitive position [4] Financial Forecast and Valuation - The company is projected to achieve revenues of 131.61 billion, 155.90 billion, and 186.33 billion from 2025 to 2027, with year-on-year growth rates of 11.55%, 18.45%, and 19.52% respectively [5] - Net profit is expected to reach 13.11 billion, 20.40 billion, and 27.63 billion during the same period, with growth rates of 0.57%, 55.68%, and 35.40% respectively [5] - The current market capitalization corresponds to a PE ratio of 90.72X, 58.28X, and 43.04X for the years 2025 to 2027 [5]

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the company is upgraded to "Buy" [5][13]. Core Insights - The launch of the AI question-answering system class is expected to help the company regain market share and enhance profitability, marking a pivotal moment for growth [7][12]. - The AI product line is anticipated to expand beyond public examination training to include civil service and teaching qualification exams, leveraging the company's existing user base and technology [3][4]. - The company is projected to achieve a revenue of approximately 800 million yuan from the AI question-answering system class in 2025, with a potential user base exceeding 200,000 [2][5]. Summary by Sections AI Product Development - The AI question-answering system class was launched on April 7, 2025, initially priced at 499 yuan, with a subsequent price adjustment to 399 yuan expected to double daily order numbers [2]. - The AI teacher product, "Fenbi Head," was launched on August 1, 2024, significantly improving teacher efficiency and user satisfaction [2][3]. Market Potential - The AI question-answering system class is projected to generate revenues of 4.7 billion to 15.7 billion yuan under various market penetration scenarios [5][8]. - The civil service training market, while smaller than K12, presents a favorable competitive landscape for the company, which is currently the only player with an internet or AI-driven approach [3][4]. Financial Projections - The company is expected to achieve total revenues of 2.805 billion yuan in 2025, with a slight growth of 0.54% year-on-year, and a net profit of 312 million yuan, reflecting a growth of 30.4% [15][12]. - The projected earnings per share for 2025 is 0.14 yuan, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 19.39 [15][12]. Competitive Advantage - The AI question-answering system class offers a high cost-performance ratio, appealing to a price-sensitive consumer base, which is crucial in the current competitive environment [4][10]. - The company’s extensive user base and continuous product iteration are expected to enhance brand loyalty and market penetration [9][10].

Group 1: Core Insights - Gold has emerged as a strong asset since 2018, outperforming most other asset classes due to factors like weakening dollar credit, normalized global geopolitical risks, and rising economic uncertainty [1] - Since 2018, only a few assets, such as certain cryptocurrencies and small-cap stocks, have managed to yield positive returns compared to gold, highlighting the challenges faced by traditional investments [1][14] Group 2: Major Asset Classes - In the equity market, U.S., Indian, and European stocks have underperformed gold, with nominal growth driven by liquidity rather than intrinsic value [2][16] - Fixed income assets, including U.S. and Chinese government bonds, have shown no advantage against gold, with significant declines in returns when priced in gold [2][37][38] - Commodities have generally underperformed gold, with precious metals leading, followed by industrial metals and energy products [2][44] - Virtual assets, particularly cryptocurrencies, have outperformed gold due to their advantages in payment convenience, technological innovation, and limited supply [2][54][55] - Real estate prices in major economies have also lagged behind gold, with the U.S. and India showing relatively smaller declines [2][21] Group 3: Industry Performance - Among primary industries, resource and new economy sectors have performed relatively well, while traditional consumer goods and old economy sectors have struggled against gold [3] - In the past year, financial and technology sectors have outperformed gold, while resource, consumer, and real estate sectors have underperformed [3][4] - Within secondary industries, emerging technologies have outperformed traditional sectors, and financial services have benefited from favorable market conditions [4][5] Group 4: Investment Styles - The micro-cap stock index has significantly outperformed gold since 2018, driven by a natural "contrarian investment mechanism" and liquidity premiums [5] - In the past year, micro-cap and financial styles have outperformed gold, while dividend styles have lagged [5][6] Group 5: Strategy Indices - Small-cap factors have shown strong performance since 2018, with pre-announcement and positive surprise indices performing relatively well [6] - In the past year, small-cap factors have remained strong, while large-cap factors have underperformed gold [6]