Group 1 - UBS expresses caution regarding the outlook for U.S. consumers and the economy, anticipating significant pressure on risk appetite in financial markets due to new tariffs and inflationary pressures [1][2][3] - The firm predicts a decline in U.S. GDP growth to approximately 1% in 2025, influenced by delayed fiscal stimulus and a cautious consumer environment [2][3] - UBS highlights rising loan delinquency rates and weakened consumer spending intentions, indicating tightening credit conditions and increased potential credit risks [1][3][17] Group 2 - The macroeconomic environment is unfavorable for consumers, with slowing economic growth and a projected unemployment rate of about 4.6% in 2025 [3][4] - UBS forecasts core PCE inflation to remain around 3.4% by the end of 2025, contributing to sustained high interest rates that will burden household debt repayment [4][9] - The impact of increased tariffs is expected to erode consumer purchasing power, with 68% of respondents indicating inflation negatively affects their economic outlook [9][16] Group 3 - UBS recommends a defensive investment strategy, focusing on high-quality, cash-flow stable companies and essential consumer goods, while avoiding high-debt and cyclical sectors [21][22] - The firm identifies a "trade-down" trend among consumers, benefiting large discount retailers like Walmart and Costco, which dominate U.S. retail spending [22] - UBS emphasizes the importance of monitoring credit cycles, as rising delinquency rates in student loans and mortgages signal increasing financial pressure on consumers [17][21]

Market Overview - The A-share market showed mixed performance with the Shanghai Composite Index down 0.12%, Shenzhen Component Index up 0.11%, and ChiNext Index up 0.36% as of midday trading [1] - The total trading volume in the three major markets reached 927 billion yuan, a decrease of 169.1 billion yuan compared to the previous day [1] - Over 3,500 stocks in the market experienced gains [1] Bond Market Dynamics - The bond futures market exhibited mixed results, with the 30-year main contract down 0.08% and the 10-year main contract down 0.02% [1] - The 30-year government bond ETF (博时, 511130) saw significant trading activity, with a transaction volume exceeding 1.4 billion yuan and a turnover rate over 15% [1] - A report indicated that supply pressure in mid to late July may prompt the central bank to strengthen its support for the bond market, suggesting a potential recovery window [1] Funding Conditions - The funding environment is expected to face pressure due to a peak in certificate of deposit and government bond supply in mid-July, alongside tax payments [2] - The net financing scale for government bonds in July is projected to be around 1.6 trillion yuan, with a cumulative net payment of 400 billion yuan in the first two weeks [2] - The central bank's open market operations (OMO) are expected to maintain a net injection, with DR007 rates likely to stay around 1.5% [2] Market Sentiment and Risks - Factors unfavorable to the bond market include a sustained increase in equity risk appetite and high bond market congestion [3] - Conversely, the bond market may benefit from a recovery in odds after market adjustments, with the 10-year and 30-year government bond yields expected to stabilize around 1.7% and 1.9% respectively [3] - The central bank's supportive stance on liquidity is anticipated to remain firm, especially with ongoing supply pressures in late July [3] ETF Specifics - The 30-year government bond ETF (博时, 511130) was established in March 2024 and is one of only two long-duration bond ETFs in the market [4] - It tracks the "Shanghai Stock Exchange 30-Year Government Bond Index," reflecting the overall performance of 30-year government bonds listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange [4] - The ETF has a duration of approximately 21 years, making it highly sensitive to interest rate changes, which is a point of interest for investors [4]

Group 1 - The report highlights a marginal improvement in financing conditions and a stable, accommodative monetary environment as of June 2025 [2][3] - In June 2025, new RMB loans amounted to 2.24 trillion yuan, significantly higher than May's 0.62 trillion yuan, while new social financing reached 4.20 trillion yuan compared to 2.29 trillion yuan in May [3] - The year-on-year growth rate of social financing was 8.9% in June, slightly up from 8.7% in May, and M2 growth was 8.3%, up from 7.9% in the previous month [3] Group 2 - Government bonds continued to support the growth rate of social financing in June, with net financing of government bonds reaching 1.41 trillion yuan, although slightly down from 1.49 trillion yuan in May [3][5] - The demand for credit from the real economy remains weak, indicating that the effects of a loose monetary policy may take time to materialize [3] - The report notes that while corporate short-term loans showed seasonal improvement, medium to long-term loans remained low, suggesting weak investment intentions among enterprises [3] Group 3 - The report indicates that the growth rates of M1 and M2 have both increased, with the M1-M2 spread narrowing, which may reflect a marginal improvement in economic activity [3][34] - The adjustment in the bond market is primarily driven by risk appetite and asset pricing effects, with expectations that the adjustment period will be limited in time and space [3] - The report anticipates that the probability of continued tight funding conditions in July is low, supported by the central bank's clear stance on maintaining a moderately accommodative monetary policy [3]

Group 1 - The index is expected to consolidate and gather strength before reaching new highs, with the recent tariff delay being fully priced in by the market, leading to a rise in major indices, including the Shanghai Composite Index reaching a high of 3555.22 points [3][14] - The market's optimistic sentiment is currently prevailing, but there is insufficient risk pricing for potential negative surprises regarding tariffs, which may hinder further declines in risk evaluation [3][14] - The market's recent rise is primarily driven by an increase in risk appetite, with the ChiNext Index, CSI 1000 Index, and All A Index outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index [4][15] Group 2 - Short-term themes are expected to rotate between policy expectations and industrial trends, with a focus on the "anti-involution" sector and real estate, which has seen a 6.1% increase this week due to anticipated policy developments [6][16] - The "anti-involution" sector, particularly in steel, pork, and certain segments of new energy, is highlighted as a potential area of focus due to high policy expectations following recent government meetings [6][16] - The trading of industrial trends is expected to continue, with short-term attention on sectors such as stablecoins, rare earths, nuclear fusion, military industry, deep-sea economy, artificial intelligence, and innovative pharmaceuticals [7][17]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - The rating for treasury bonds is "oscillation" [6] 2. Core View of the Report - In the short - term, risk appetite has rebounded, but in the long - term, the bond market is still bullish. Although the recent trend of treasury bonds is relatively weak, the logic of activities like "transfer trade" is not sustainable. The long - term fundamental situation remains unchanged. Once risk appetite starts to decline and there are incremental positive factors, the bond market will strengthen non - linearly. Therefore, it is recommended to lay out medium - term long positions on dips [2][14][16] 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 One - Week Review and Views 3.1.1 This Week's Trend Review - From July 7th to July 13th, treasury bond futures oscillated and adjusted. On Monday, with a calm market news and slightly tightened funding, treasury bond futures oscillated narrowly, and the 30Y interest rate rose slightly due to the news of ultra - long special treasury bond issuance. On Tuesday, as trade conflict intensity was within market expectations, rising certificate of deposit (CD) rates and a strong stock market led to an oscillating decline in treasury bond futures. On Wednesday, the stock market weakened while long - term treasury bond futures strengthened, and the short - term ones were relatively weak with a flattening yield curve. On Thursday, the market sentiment improved marginally in the morning but then the stock market soared, causing the bond market to weaken. In the afternoon, the expectation of real - estate stabilizing policies led to a plunge in treasury bond futures. On Friday, with balanced funding, the bond market fluctuated with the stock market. As of July 11th, the settlement prices of the main contracts of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bond futures were 102.412, 105.975, 108.815, and 120.510 yuan respectively, down 0.096, 0.275, 0.295, and 0.690 yuan from last weekend [1][12] 3.1.2 Next Week's View - The market is still difficult to strengthen next week. With the arrival of the tax period, the funding will marginally tighten, and the expected strong economic data in June and high risk appetite will suppress the bond market. However, in the long - run, it is advisable to lay out medium - term long positions on dips. Strategies include holding long positions, paying attention to positive arbitrage opportunities in treasury bond futures, and stopping profit on the strategy of steepening the yield curve first and then looking for new opportunities [2][14][15][16] 3.2 Weekly Observation of Interest - Rate Bonds 3.2.1 Primary Market - This week, 70 interest - rate bonds were issued with a total issuance of 69 billion yuan and a net financing of 46.2369 billion yuan, up 17.6781 billion and 8.579 billion yuan respectively from last week. 45 local government bonds were issued with a total issuance of 23.179 billion yuan and a net financing of 11.0229 billion yuan, up 15.9651 billion and 8.858 billion yuan respectively. 454 CDs were issued with a total issuance of 42.713 billion yuan and a net financing of - 8.339 billion yuan, up 18.416 billion and down 8.057 billion yuan respectively [20] 3.2.2 Secondary Market - Treasury bond yields rose. As of July 11th, the yields of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bonds were 1.40%, 1.53%, 1.66%, and 1.87% respectively, up 4.28, 3.41, 2.05, and 1.95 basis points from last weekend. The 10Y - 1Y, 10Y - 5Y, and 30Y - 10Y spreads narrowed. The yields of 1 - year, 5 - year, and 10 - year policy - bank bonds were 1.50%, 1.61%, and 1.71% respectively, up 5.03, 4.51, and 3.13 basis points from last weekend [30] 3.3 Treasury Bond Futures 3.3.1 Price, Trading Volume, and Open Interest - Treasury bond futures oscillated and adjusted. As of July 11th, the settlement prices of the main contracts of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bond futures were 102.412, 105.975, 108.815, and 120.510 yuan respectively, down 0.096, 0.275, 0.295, and 0.690 yuan from last weekend. The trading volumes of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bond futures this week were 38,238, 66,066, 72,274, and 98,226 lots respectively, up 7,022, 7,450, 1,993, and 16,442 lots from last weekend. The open interests were 124,636, 202,629, 244,640, and 150,356 lots respectively, with changes of - 673, + 9,156, + 4,737, and + 6,317 lots from last weekend [38][43] 3.3.2 Basis and Implied Repo Rate (IRR) - Positive arbitrage opportunities were not obvious this week. With balanced and loose funding, the basis of futures oscillated narrowly. The IRR of the cheapest - to - deliver (CTD) bonds of each main contract was around 1.8%, and the current CD rate was slightly higher than 1.6%, resulting in relatively few positive arbitrage opportunities [48] 3.3.3 Inter - Delivery and Inter - Variety Spreads - As of July 11th, the inter - delivery spreads of 2 - year, 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year treasury bond futures between the 2509 and 2512 contracts were - 0.100, - 0.105, - 0.040, and + 0.180 yuan respectively, with changes of + 0.024, - 0.020, + 0.045, and + 0.050 yuan from last weekend. The far - term contracts adjusted more this week [53] 3.4 Weekly Observation of Funding - The central bank net - withdrew 22.65 billion yuan through reverse repurchase operations this week. As of July 11th, R007, DR007, SHIBOR overnight, and SHIBOR 1 - week were 1.51%, 1.47%, 1.33%, and 1.48% respectively, up 0.86, 0.58, 2.80, and 5.20 basis points from last weekend. The average daily trading volume of inter - bank pledged repurchase was 8.21 trillion yuan, up 0.61 trillion yuan from last week, and the overnight proportion was 89.57%, slightly lower than last week [57][60][63] 3.5 Weekly Overseas Observation - The US dollar index strengthened slightly, and the 10Y US treasury bond yield rose slightly. As of July 11th, the US dollar index rose 0.91% to 97.8731 from last weekend, the 10Y US treasury bond yield was 4.43%, up 8 basis points from last weekend, and the yield spread between Chinese and US 10Y treasury bonds was inverted by 276.7 basis points [67] 3.6 Weekly Observation of High - Frequency Inflation Data - Industrial product prices rose this week. As of July 11th, the Nanhua Industrial Product Index, Metal Index, and Energy and Chemical Index were 3,612.73, 6,281.86, and 1,679.68 points respectively, up 55.22, 65.52, and 29.21 points from last weekend. Agricultural product prices also rose, with the prices of pork, 28 key vegetables, and 7 key fruits at 20.60, 4.42, and 7.45 yuan/kg respectively, up 0.02, 0.08, and 0.15 yuan/kg from last weekend [70] 3.7 Investment Suggestions - It is recommended to lay out medium - term long positions on dips [71]

Core Viewpoint - President Trump's announcement of a 35% tariff on goods imported from Canada, effective August 1, has escalated trade threats and caused significant global market reactions, including declines in stock indices and a stronger US dollar [1][2]. Market Reactions - European stock indices opened lower, with the Euro Stoxx 50 down 0.4%, and the German DAX down 0.5%, reflecting investor concerns over the potential for increased tariffs [2][3]. - The US dollar index rose by 0.2%, while the Japanese yen fell, becoming the worst-performing currency among G10 currencies [1][3][6]. - Bitcoin continued its upward trend, surpassing $118,000, marking a new historical high [1][3][13]. Economic Impact - The new tariff rate of 35% is higher than the current 25% tariff on Canadian imports not covered by the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) [2]. - The UK economy contracted by 0.1% in May, marking the second consecutive month of negative growth, which is below economists' expectations of a 0.1% increase [2]. - Emerging market currencies in Asia, such as the Indian rupee and Malaysian ringgit, faced pressure against the US dollar [2][9]. Commodity Performance - Gold prices stabilized above $3,335 per ounce after two days of increases, while silver rose over 1% to $37.38 per ounce [3][10]. - Gold has increased by over 25% this year, supported by geopolitical tensions and central bank purchases [13].

Group 1 - The recent stock market rebound led by Nvidia has driven Bitcoin prices to briefly surpass $112,000, marking a historical high before a slight retreat [2] - Nvidia became the first company to briefly exceed a market capitalization of $4 trillion, contributing to the rise in tech stocks and the Nasdaq index reaching a new all-time high [2] - Despite the influx of billions into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), Bitcoin has only increased by 2% over the past month, indicating a period of narrow fluctuations [2] Group 2 - The sustainability of Bitcoin's price increase largely depends on macroeconomic conditions and developments in trade, particularly in light of the upcoming August 1 trade agreement deadline [3] - A potential trade agreement progress and lower inflation data could support a continued rise in Bitcoin prices, as indicated by the recent Federal Reserve meeting minutes suggesting a favorable environment for interest rate cuts [3] - A weaker dollar has also provided support for Bitcoin, as it is primarily priced in dollars [4]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report - The 50 - year treasury bond has performed well recently, with the spread between 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds continuously narrowing. The current 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread is at a neutral level, with limited room for further compression and limited adjustment pressure [1][4]. 3. Summary by Related Contents 3.1 Performance of 50 - year Treasury Bonds - The 50 - year treasury bond has become an increasingly important trading variety in the low - coupon period. The spread between 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds decreased from 15.6bps on June 16th to 8.4bps on July 4th, a cumulative decrease of 7.2bps, and is now below the 2023 average. The current stock of 50 - year treasury bonds has reached 1.3 trillion, making it a significant investment variety [1][7]. 3.2 Factors Affecting the 50 - 30 Year Treasury Bond Spread - **Fundamentals**: Fundamental indicators such as PMI, CPI, and PPI have no significant correlation with the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread in recent years, indicating that fundamentals have little explanatory power for this spread, which mainly reflects asset attribute differences [1][10]. - **Turnover Rate**: Since 2023, the turnover rate of ultra - long bonds has increased significantly. In June this year, the monthly turnover rate of 50 - year treasury bonds reached 7.5%, exceeding that of 30 - year treasury bonds. There is a certain correlation between the difference in turnover rates of 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds and the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread. As the liquidity of 50 - year treasury bonds improves, the liquidity premium decreases, leading to a trend compression of the spread [2][12]. - **Stock Market Risk Preference**: The risk preference reflected by the stock market has a certain positive correlation with the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread. Historically, the spread between 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds has a certain positive correlation with the Wind All - A Index, suggesting that 30 - year treasury bonds can better represent market risk preference. However, it remains to be seen whether this relationship will change as the liquidity of 50 - year treasury bonds improves [2][16]. - **Funding Price and Bond Supply**: There is a certain negative correlation between the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread and R007, indicating that the funding price has an impact on the curve slope, but the overall correlation is not significant. The net financing of 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds and their difference have a weak correlation with the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread, but they have had a strong impact on the spread since last year [3][18]. 3.3 Quantitative Pricing Model - A quantitative pricing model was constructed using the monthly average of R007, the monthly net financing difference between 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds, the monthly average turnover rate difference between 30 - year and 50 - year treasury bonds, and the Wind All - A Index as explanatory variables to explain the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread. The regression results show that the model has relatively strong explanatory power, and all four variables can strongly explain the ultra - long bond term spread [3][20]. 3.4 Current Situation and Outlook of the 50 - 30 Year Treasury Bond Spread - The June fitting value of the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread was 4.9bp, slightly lower than the current 8.4bps. Assuming that the turnover rates of 50 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds are at the average of the past two months, R007 is at 1.5%, the stock index remains at the current level, and net financing is calculated according to the bond issuance plan, the fitting value of the 50 - 30 year treasury bond spread in the next few months will be around 7.4bps, close to the current spread. Therefore, the current 50 - 30 year spread is at a neutral level, with limited room for further compression and limited adjustment risk in a context of continuous liquidity easing and active trading of 50 - year treasury bonds [4][23].

Group 1: Market Performance - A-shares reached a new high in 2025, while U.S. stocks hit historical highs, indicating a synchronized upward trend[3] - The Shanghai Composite Index increased by 5.9% from April to July 2025, while the S&P 500 rose by 16.1% during the same period[12] - Historical instances of synchronized rises between Chinese and U.S. markets include periods from January to April 2019, March 2020 to February 2021, October 2022 to April 2023, and April 2025 to July 2025[4] Group 2: Economic Drivers - The stock market's rise is driven by three main factors: interest rates, risk appetite, and profit growth[3] - Monetary easing expectations have led to a decrease in interest rates, which supports stock market growth[3] - The U.S. dollar's depreciation is beneficial for liquidity and market expectations, impacting non-U.S. assets positively[3] Group 3: Historical Context - The synchronized rises often follow significant events that lead to improved market sentiment and valuation expectations[4] - The period from January to April 2019 saw a 24.9% increase in the Shanghai Composite Index, driven by easing trade tensions and monetary policy shifts[12] - The period from March 2020 to February 2021 experienced a 46.4% increase in the S&P 500, supported by aggressive policy measures amid the pandemic[12] Group 4: Future Outlook - Trade uncertainty is expected to decrease, which may stabilize market volatility but could also introduce new fluctuations[6] - Short-term economic fundamentals in both countries are unlikely to drive stock market growth, with a focus on policy expectations instead[7] - The anticipated monetary easing in both the U.S. and China is expected to support market confidence until actual policy changes are implemented[7]

以下文章来源于六亿居士 ，作者六亿居士 六亿居士 . 雪球2024年度十大影响力用户。每周发布指数估值表，坚持指数基金(ETF)低估定投，分享指数基金基 础分析，让我们：买入有依，持有有底，卖出有据。 风险提示：本文所提到的观点仅代表个人的意见，所涉及标的不作推荐，据此买卖，风险自负。 作者：六亿居士 来源：雪球 前几天 ， 61和两个朋友聊天 。 一个是体制内老同学 ， 收入不高但胜在稳定 。 过去三年他定投沪深300 ， 虽然账户反复波动 ， 最近反而赚钱了 。 他笑着说 ： " 还好我不是靠投资吃饭的 ， 不然即便你提醒 ， 我也早就 扛不住了 。 " 另一个做互联网产品 ， 自2021年年中开始定投恒生科技 ， 自信来源于对行业的判断 。 结果到 2023年年底时不得不遗憾离场 ， 他叹了口气 ： " 我其实知道长期会好 ， 但那时候失业了 ， 心态不稳 ， 真的扛不动 。 " 是啊 ， 我们常听人说 " 长期主义 " ， 但长期主义的前提 ， 是我们能在市场下行时不被生活打 断 ， 不被现金流拖垮 。 今天这篇反思 ， 我们不谈市场 ， 不谈估值 ， 只谈 ： 我们靠什么吃饭 ？ 能扛多大风浪 ？ ...