2025 年 7 月 6 日 行业研究 25H1 原油市场波动剧烈，关注地缘政治和 OPEC+增产进展 ——石油化工行业周报第 410 期（20250630—20250706） 要点 供需宽松叠加地缘政治扰动， 25H1 油价震荡下行。2025H1，需求预期下行 叠加 OPEC+持续加速增产，油价整体震荡下行，但地缘政治事件使油价波动 较为剧烈。2025 年 1 月，美国对俄罗斯石油行业实施大规模制裁，推动油价 上涨，2-3 月俄乌和谈预期使油价下行，4 月以来，贸易冲突加剧叠加 OPEC+ 持续推动增产计划，油价中枢不断下行，6 月伊以短期冲突使油价快速上涨后 回落。截至 2025 年 6 月 30 日，布伦特、WTI 原油分别报收 66.63、64.97 美 元/桶，较年初分别-11.0%、-9.6%。 俄乌冲突长期化叠加伊以停火存隐忧，地缘政治风险仍将扰动油价。俄乌冲 突方面，由于 25Q2 以来和谈实际进展缓慢，且俄乌两次直接会谈均未取得成 果，目前俄乌冲突长期化成为市场共同预期。中东地缘冲突方面，本次伊以冲 突源于伊核谈判失败，而停火后伊核问题的后续谈判方案尚不明确，伊朗计划 继续其核计划，伊以停火 ...

——铜行业周报（20250630-20250704） 要点 2025 年 7 月 6 日 行业研究 6 月电解铜产量环比下降 0.3%、同比增长 13% 本周小结：需求继续走弱，逼仓风险仍存。截至 2025 年 7 月 4 日，SHFE 铜收 盘价 79730 元/吨，环比 6 月 27 日-0.24%；LME 铜收盘价 9852 美元/吨，环 比 6 月 27 日-0.27%。（1）交易：LME 铜库存本周微升，但仍处于 10 万吨以 下，美国以外的铜市场现货紧张局面并未扭转。（2）供需：矿端、废铜预期后 续仍维持紧张；需求端，线缆开工率持续回落，7-9 月国内空调排产同比增速逐 步放缓，需求后续有走弱风险。短期逼仓风险仍存，铜价或仍表现强势，逼仓交 易结束后或重回震荡。 库存：国内铜社库环比+1.3%，LME 铜库存环比+5.1%。（1）国内港口铜精矿 库存：截至 2025 年 7 月 4 日，国内主流港口铜精矿库存 66.6 万吨，环比上周 +6.8%。（2）全球电解铜库存：截至 2025 年 6 月 30 日，全球三大交易所库存 合计 38.1 万吨，环比-4.1%。截至 2025 年 7 月 3 日 ...

Report Summary 1. Investment Rating No investment rating for the industry is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - The central bank's tolerance of the current 10Y Treasury yield means it's unlikely to significantly raise DR rates if the (ultra) long - end of the yield curve stays at current levels or declines slightly and slowly [3][14]. - Before the next OMO rate cut, the room for further decline in the DR007 and DR001 central rates is limited [1][2][11]. - The 1Y CD rate is currently slightly overvalued, and the central bank will consider its impact on bank net interest margins, loan issuance, yield curve long - end, and future Treasury trading when supplying medium - term base money [15]. 3. Summary by Section 7 - month Funding Situation - Since July, the money market interest rates have been falling. As of July 4, DR001 and DR007 have dropped to 1.31% and 1.42% respectively, but the room for further decline is limited before the next OMO rate cut [1][9]. - OMO reverse repurchase operations have "tool mode" and "non - tool mode". In the "non - tool mode", the DR007 central rate is slightly higher than the 7D OMO rate, and DR001 is slightly lower. Currently, the spreads between DR007, DR001 and 7D OMO are lower than the 2024 average, approaching the 1/4 quantile [2][11]. - In the "non - tool mode", DR007 is not an indication of monetary policy attitude and is unlikely to decline ahead of the 7D OMO rate. In 2024, the 7D OMO rate changed first, and then DR007 adjusted accordingly [2][11]. Treasury Yield Analysis - The 10Y Treasury yield has been stable around 1.65% recently, and the central bank tolerates its current trend [3][14]. - Since June, the decline of the 50Y Treasury yield has been greater than that of the 10Y variety. As of July 4, the spread between the 50Y and 10Y Treasuries has compressed by 11.1bp compared to the end of May. If the (ultra) long - term interest rate yields decline significantly or rapidly, OMO may switch from "non - tool mode" to "tool mode", and the DR007 central rate may rise significantly [4][14]. CD Rate Analysis - The 1Y CD rate is currently slightly overvalued. On July 4, the spread between the 1Y AAA - rated CD and 7D OMO was 19.3bp, lower than 83% of trading days in 2024 [15]. - The central bank will consider the impact of CD rates on bank net interest margins, loan issuance, yield curve long - end, and future Treasury trading when supplying medium - term base money [15].

2025 年 7 月 6 日 行业研究 2Q25 特斯拉交付环比修复，小米 YU7 订单火爆引发新势力购车权益加码 ——特斯拉与新势力 6 月销量跟踪报告 要点 2Q25 特斯拉全球交付量环比修复：2Q25 特斯拉全球交付量同比 -13.5%/环比 +14.1%至 38.4 万辆（Model 3+Y 同比-11.5%/环比+15.4%至 37.4 万辆）。 6 月理想交付同环比下滑，小鹏/蔚来环比企稳：1）理想交付量同比-24.1%/环 比-11.2%至 36,279 辆；2）小鹏交付量同比+224.4%/环比+3.2%至 34,611 辆； 3）蔚来交付量同比+17.5%/环比+7.3%至 24,925 辆（乐道 L60 交付环比+1.9% 至 6,400 辆、萤火虫交付环比+6.8%至 3,932 辆）。 小米 YU7 订单火爆引发国内新势力权益加码，小鹏 G7 上市差异化策略清晰： 特斯拉：国产 Model 3 后驱版和长续航版交付周期维持 1-3 周、高性能版交付 周期延长至 8-10 周（vs. 6 月为 1-3 周），焕新版 Model Y 交付周期缩短至 1-3 周（vs. 6 月为 2-5 周 ...

Investment Rating - The industry is rated as "Buy" [6] Core Viewpoints - The pig farming sector is expected to see a recovery in prices due to seasonal demand and a slight increase in the number of breeding sows, indicating a potential long-term profit cycle [5][70] - The recent increase in pig prices is attributed to supply constraints caused by seasonal weather conditions and reduced slaughtering activities [24] - The overall agricultural sector has shown resilience, outperforming the market indices in recent weeks [15] Summary by Sections 1. Industry Performance - The agricultural sector index rose by 2.55% in the week ending July 4, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index by 1.15% [15] - The pig farming sub-sector saw a price increase of 4.28% for live pigs, while the average weight of pigs at slaughter reached 128.64 kg, up 0.50 kg week-on-week [24] 2. Key Data Tracking - As of the end of May, the number of breeding sows was 40.42 million, a slight increase of 0.1% month-on-month and 1.2% year-on-year [1] - The average price for live pigs decreased to 14.92 yuan/kg in May, down 0.9% month-on-month and 5.4% year-on-year [1] - The average profit per pig for large-scale farms dropped to 49 yuan per head in May, down from 86 yuan in April [1] 3. Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on the pig farming sector, highlighting companies such as Muyuan Foods, Wens Foodstuff Group, and Juxing Agriculture as key investment opportunities [5][70] - The feed and veterinary sectors are also expected to benefit from the recovery in pig stocks, with companies like Haida Group and Ruipu Biological Products suggested for consideration [5][70] - In the planting chain, the upward trend in grain prices presents investment opportunities in companies like Suqian Agricultural Development and Beidahuang Group [5][70]

2025 年 7 月 5 日 行业研究 "反内卷"叠加旺季来临，煤价板块底部或已出现 ——煤炭开采行业周报（2025.6.30~2025.7.6） 要点 "反内卷"叠加旺季来临，煤价板块底部或已出现。（1）7 月 1 日，中共中央 总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席、中央财经委员会主任习近平主持召开中央 财经委员会第六次会议，会议提出，要依法依规治理企业低价无序竞争，引导 企业提升产品品质，推动落后产能有序退出；（2）本周 28 个主要城市平均气 温为 30.56 ℃，已进入季节性高温区间，夏季用煤旺季已经来临；（3）在基本 面、事件共同驱动下，近期焦煤期货价格、煤炭板块均止跌回升。 本周港口煤价小幅反弹，海外天然气价格回落。（1）本周（6.30-7.4）秦皇岛 港口动力煤平仓价（5500 大卡周度平均值）为 621 元/吨，环比+5 元/吨 （+0.88%）；（2）陕西榆林动力混煤坑口价格（5800 大卡）周度平均值为 475 元/吨，环比+1 元/吨（+0.21%）；（3）澳大利亚纽卡斯尔港动力煤 FOB 价格 （5500 大卡周度平均值）为 65 美元/吨，环比-1.89%；（4）欧洲天然气期货 结算价（D ...

2025 年 7 月 5 日 行业研究 MXD6 具备高阻隔及高刚性特点，国产厂商放量在即空间广阔 ——MXD6 特种尼龙行业动态报告 要点 MXD6 商业化始于 20 世纪 80 年代，兼具高阻隔及高刚性特点。聚己二酰间苯 二甲胺（MXD6）是由间苯二甲胺（MXDA）与己二酸缩聚制得的一类结晶型聚 酰胺。20 世纪 80 年代，日本三菱瓦斯化学公司实现了 MXD6 的工业化。得益 于分子结构中引入的芳香环，MXD6 兼具脂肪族尼龙的易加工性与芳香族聚合物 的高强度，具备高气体阻隔性、高刚性、良好的热稳定性和低吸水率等特性。在 工程应用中，MXD6 通常通过直接熔融缩聚法制得，该工艺具备连续化、产品性 能优异等优势，技术门槛也更高。 基于高阻隔性，MXD6 在食品饮料包装领域用量空间可观。MXD6 因其优异的氧 气和二氧化碳阻隔能力，可应用于食品和饮料的包装材料中。通过与 PA6、PET 等材料共混或共挤，MXD6 可制成多种形态的包装结构，有效延长预制菜、碳酸 饮料、茶饮料等产品的货架期，并实现包装的轻量化。根据艾媒咨询统计，2024 年我国预制菜行业市场规模约为 6972 亿元。根据国家统计局等统计，20 ...

Quantitative Models and Construction Methods - **Model Name**: PB-ROE-50 **Model Construction Idea**: The model combines Price-to-Book ratio (PB) and Return on Equity (ROE) to select stocks with high profitability and reasonable valuation[3][25] **Model Construction Process**: The PB-ROE-50 portfolio is constructed by selecting 50 stocks with the highest combined scores of PB and ROE within specific stock pools (e.g., CSI 500, CSI 800, and the entire market). The portfolio is rebalanced periodically to maintain its composition[25][26] **Model Evaluation**: The model demonstrates consistent excess returns across different stock pools, indicating its effectiveness in capturing profitable investment opportunities[25][26] - **Model Name**: Institutional Research Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The model leverages public and private institutional research data to identify stocks with potential excess returns[28] **Model Construction Process**: The portfolio is constructed based on institutional research data, with public research focusing on CSI 800 stocks and private research tracking broader market stocks. Stocks are selected based on research frequency and sentiment, and the portfolio is rebalanced monthly[28][29] **Model Evaluation**: The model shows positive excess returns, particularly for private research tracking strategies, suggesting its ability to capture valuable insights from institutional activities[28][29] - **Model Name**: Block Trade Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The model identifies stocks with high block trade activity and low volatility to capture potential excess returns[31] **Model Construction Process**: Stocks are selected based on "block trade transaction ratio" and "6-day transaction volatility." The portfolio is rebalanced monthly to maintain its focus on high-transaction, low-volatility stocks[31][32] **Model Evaluation**: The model's performance varies, with occasional excess return drawdowns, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and adjustment[31][32] - **Model Name**: Directed Issuance Portfolio **Model Construction Idea**: The model focuses on stocks involved in directed issuance events to capture event-driven investment opportunities[37] **Model Construction Process**: Stocks are selected based on directed issuance announcements, considering factors like market capitalization, rebalancing frequency, and position control. The portfolio is rebalanced periodically to align with event-driven dynamics[37][38] **Model Evaluation**: The model shows mixed results, with occasional excess return drawdowns, indicating the need for further refinement in capturing event-driven effects[37][38] --- Model Backtesting Results - **PB-ROE-50 Model** - CSI 500: Weekly excess return 1.17%, absolute return 1.99%[25][26] - CSI 800: Weekly excess return 1.21%, absolute return 2.58%[25][26] - Entire Market: Weekly excess return 1.36%, absolute return 2.51%[25][26] - **Institutional Research Portfolio** - Public Research: Weekly excess return 0.02%, absolute return 1.37%[28][29] - Private Research: Weekly excess return 0.25%, absolute return 1.61%[28][29] - **Block Trade Portfolio** - Weekly excess return -0.24%, absolute return 0.88%[31][32] - **Directed Issuance Portfolio** - Weekly excess return -0.69%, absolute return 0.43%[37][38] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods - **Factor Name**: BP Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor uses the Book-to-Price ratio to identify undervalued stocks[20] **Factor Construction Process**: BP is calculated as the inverse of the Price-to-Book ratio. Stocks with higher BP values are considered undervalued and selected for portfolios[20] **Factor Evaluation**: BP demonstrates positive returns in multiple industries, indicating its effectiveness in identifying undervalued stocks[23][24] - **Factor Name**: ROE Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor measures profitability using Return on Equity[20] **Factor Construction Process**: ROE is calculated as net income divided by shareholder equity. Stocks with higher ROE values are considered more profitable and selected for portfolios[20] **Factor Evaluation**: ROE shows positive returns across various industries, highlighting its ability to capture profitable investment opportunities[23][24] - **Factor Name**: Nonlinear Market Cap Factor **Factor Construction Idea**: The factor captures the impact of market capitalization on stock returns using a nonlinear approach[20] **Factor Construction Process**: Nonlinear transformations of market capitalization are applied to identify stocks with specific size-related characteristics[20] **Factor Evaluation**: The factor shows negative returns, indicating challenges in capturing size-related effects[20] --- Factor Backtesting Results - **BP Factor** - Weekly return 0.30%[20] - **ROE Factor** - Weekly return 0.27%[20] - **Nonlinear Market Cap Factor** - Weekly return -0.31%[20] - **Scale Factor** - Weekly return -0.29%[20]

总量研究 政府就业回升不可持续，美国非农弱势渐显 ——2025 年 6 月美国非农数据点评 要点 2025 年 7 月 4 日 事件： 2025 年 7 月 3 日，美国劳工部公布 2025 年 6 月非农数据：新增非农就业 14.7 万人，预期 11.0 万人，前值由 13.9 万人修正至 14.4 万人；6 月失业率 4.1%， 预期 4.3%，前值 4.2%；平均时薪同比升 3.7%，预期升 3.9%，前值由升 3.9% 修正至升 3.8%。 核心观点： 2025 年 6 月美国新增就业回升，但仍有隐忧。一方面，从结构看，6 月政府就 业贡献新增就业近一半，远超季节性趋势，或因 DOGE 改革暂歇后的暂时性回 补，持续性存疑。另一方面，相比于政府部门，6 月私人部门就业转弱，服务业 部门新增就业明显放缓，从前值的 14.1 万人降至 6.8 万人，反映出关税扰动下 美国经济的潜在压力，不宜高估本次非农数据的韧性。 考虑到政府就业回升不可持续，非农数据有转弱风险，美联储在下半年重启降息 操作的概率较大。客观上看，本次非农数据高于预期，同时减税法案顺利落地， 缓和经济衰退担忧，短期内美联储或继续保持观望，7 ...

Group 1: Tax Reform Overview - The tax reform primarily extends existing tax cuts from the 2017 tax reform, with a limited incremental scale of approximately $4.5 trillion over the next ten years, while new tax relief measures amount to only $0.7 trillion[3] - The tax reform focuses on individual tax cuts, with an estimated reduction in tax revenue of about $4.2 trillion for individual taxes compared to $1.1 trillion for corporate taxes over the same period[4] - The U.S. government deficit is projected to increase by approximately $4 trillion over the next decade due to the tax reform, despite potential increases in tariff revenues[5] Group 2: Economic Impact - The tax reform is expected to partially offset the economic pressure from tariffs, potentially alleviating recession expectations in the U.S. economy[2] - The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the tax reform could increase U.S. GDP growth by an average of 0.5 percentage points from 2025 to 2034, while tariffs are projected to decrease GDP growth by 0.6 to 0.8 percentage points[14] - The distributional effects of the tax reform indicate that the bottom 10% of low-income households may see a decrease in disposable income by about 2% by 2027, while the top 10% may benefit from an increase[15]