Core Viewpoints - Consumption and investment data have significantly weakened, but industrial production remains relatively resilient [3][88] - The economic indicators for July reflect some mid-term risks, but policies are being intensified, and economic growth is expected to remain within a reasonable range in the second half of the year [5][90] Consumption - In July, the year-on-year growth of social retail sales was 3.7%, down 1.1 percentage points from the previous value, primarily due to the slow disbursement of national subsidy funds [9][88] - The sales of furniture and home appliances saw significant declines, with furniture down 8.1 percentage points to 20.6% and home appliances down 3.7 percentage points to 28.7% [3][9] - Service consumption showed relative stability, with restaurant income slightly improving to 1.1% and cumulative service retail sales maintaining a high level at 5.2% year-on-year [3][9] Investment - Fixed asset investment in July fell sharply, reflecting short-term weather disturbances and mid-term impacts such as declining investment prices and the end of the equipment renewal cycle [4][13] - The year-on-year decline in fixed asset investment was 4.6 percentage points to -4.7%, marking the lowest level since Q1 2020 [4][13] - The construction progress was affected by extreme weather, with infrastructure and real estate investments experiencing greater declines than overall fixed investment [4][13] Real Estate - In July, real estate sales continued to decline, with corporate financing weakening and a lagging impact from reduced projects [4][89] - The growth rate of corporate credit financing dropped significantly by 13.5 percentage points to -15.8%, the lowest in nearly two years [4][89] - The sales area of commercial housing fell by 2.4 percentage points to -7.8%, indicating a slowdown in the release of pent-up demand [4][89] Production - Despite significant weaknesses in consumption and investment, industrial production maintained relative resilience, primarily due to improvements in export chain production [4][33] - The industrial added value year-on-year in July fell by 1.1 percentage points to 5.7%, but still remained at a high level [4][33] - Strong performance was noted in industries with robust export, such as black metal rolling and transportation equipment, while production in sectors like metal products and electrical machinery declined due to equipment renewal and internal competition [4][33] Summary - The economic indicators for July reflect some mid-term risks, with a continued pattern of weak domestic demand and strong external demand [5][90] - The second half of the year may see further declines in manufacturing and real estate investment, making it crucial to enhance service and infrastructure investment and stabilize consumer demand [5][90]

Core Viewpoint - The rebound in M2 year-on-year is primarily driven by the active capital market, which has accelerated the return of funds to the banking system, leading to a record high in non-bank deposits for July [3][48]. Financial Data Summary - As of July 2025, the credit balance decreased by 0.2 percentage points year-on-year to 6.9%, while the social financing stock increased by 0.1 percentage points to 9.0%, and M2 rose by 0.5 percentage points to 8.8% [2][8]. - Non-bank deposits increased by 21,400 billion, the highest level recorded for the same period since 2015, with a year-on-year increase of 13,900 billion [3][48]. - The total social financing scale stock rose from 8.0% at the end of 2024 to 9.0% by July 2025, mainly due to the front-loading of government bond net financing [4][24]. Loan and Credit Analysis - Resident loans saw a significant decline, decreasing by 4,893 billion, which is a year-on-year reduction of 2,793 billion, reflecting a cautious attitude towards debt amid an unstable job market [3][14]. - Corporate credit showed a mixed trend, with short-term loans and bill financing performing well, while medium- to long-term loans remained weak, indicating a cautious stance on long-term investments [19][49]. - In July, new loans decreased by 500 billion year-on-year, primarily due to the reduction in resident loans [27][50]. Future Outlook - The introduction of loan interest subsidy policies may help lower the overall financing costs and stimulate credit growth through fiscal and financial collaboration [26][49]. - The government bond net financing has been a significant contributor to the increase in social financing, but this phase may be nearing its end as the base for government bond financing remains high [4][24].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the upcoming expiration of the US-China tariff suspension measures and the potential for easing trade tensions following recent "investment for tariff" agreements between the US and other economies like Japan and the EU. It highlights the uncertainty surrounding the execution of these agreements and the ongoing risks of trade conflicts. Group 1: Trade Negotiation Progress - The US has made significant progress in trade negotiations, having reached agreements or suspensions with nine economies, covering 49.7% of its import goods as of August 1 [2][6][49] - The effective tariff rate in the US for Q2 was 7.9%, significantly lower than the theoretical rate, which has risen to 18.3% from 2.4% at the beginning of the year [2][9][50] - The US has established a three-tiered tariff system based on trade agreements, with low tariffs (10%) for allies, medium tariffs (15%-20%) for agreed economies, and high tariffs (20%-50%) for those with stalled negotiations [3][14][50] Group 2: Feasibility of Trade Agreements - The EU must increase its annual investment in the US by 2.6 times to meet its commitment of $600 billion, with the majority of funding coming from private enterprises, making execution uncertain [4][16][51] - Japan's commitment of $550 billion is primarily in loans, requiring a significant increase in annual investment to meet targets, while South Korea's commitment of $350 billion poses similar challenges due to its scale relative to national spending [4][21][51] - The EU's energy procurement goals are ambitious, aiming for $750 billion over three years, which is three times the expected imports in 2024, indicating a significant execution gap [4][26][51] Group 3: Tariff Risk Mitigation - The US is likely to continue leveraging tariffs as a source of revenue and negotiation power, with tariff income reaching $125.6 billion in 2025, 2.3 times that of 2024 [5][32][52] - The uncertainty surrounding the execution of trade agreements suggests that the US may maintain tariff threats as a pressure tactic, particularly in the lead-up to the August 12 deadline for US-China tariff discussions [5][32][52] - The US's approach to tariffs is shifting from a focus on currency manipulation to fiscal control, indicating a long-term strategy of using tariffs as a financial lever rather than solely for trade balance [5][37][40]

Group 1 - Developed markets' stock indices experienced a rebound, with the Nasdaq index rising by 3.9%, and the S&P 500 increasing by 2.4% [2][3] - Emerging market indices mostly saw gains, with the Ho Chi Minh index up by 6.0% and the Cairo CASE 30 up by 4.7%, while the Indian SENSEX fell by 0.9% [3][11] - The Hang Seng Index and related indices all rose, with the Hang Seng Index increasing by 1.4% and the Hang Seng Tech Index by 1.2% [11] Group 2 - The majority of sectors in the S&P 500 saw increases, particularly Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services, which rose by 4.3%, 3.8%, and 3.3% respectively [6] - In the Eurozone, sectors such as Financials, Materials, and Industrials also saw gains, with increases of 5.8%, 3.5%, and 2.8% respectively [6] Group 3 - The prices of major commodities showed mixed results, with WTI crude oil falling by 7.8% to $63.9 per barrel, while coking coal prices rose by 12.3% to 1,227 yuan per ton [26][30] - Precious metals prices increased, with COMEX gold rising by 1.3% to $3,403.5 per ounce and COMEX silver up by 4.4% to $38.4 per ounce [30][31] Group 4 - The U.S. announced new tariffs on semiconductor imports, imposing a 100% tariff on all imported semiconductor chips, effective August 7, while also increasing tariffs on Indian goods by 25% [32][34] - The U.S. Treasury held several bond auctions, with the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.26%, indicating weaker demand for long-term bonds [34] Group 5 - The U.S. ISM Services PMI for July was reported at 50.1, below the market expectation of 51.5, indicating a potential slowdown in the services sector [40] - Upcoming U.S. CPI data is anticipated, with consensus predicting a core CPI increase of 0.3% for July, which may influence future Federal Reserve rate decisions [43][44] Group 6 - Germany's industrial production for June fell by 1.9%, significantly below the expected decline of 0.5%, suggesting ongoing economic challenges [46]

文 | 赵伟、屠强 联系人 | 屠强、耿佩璇 摘要 事件： 8月9日，国家统计局公布7月通胀数据，CPI同比0%、前值0.1%、预期-0.1%、环比0.4%；PPI同 比-3.6%、前值-3.6%、预期-3.4%、环比-0.2%。 核心观点：统计时点及中下游产能利用率偏低是PPI表现偏弱的两条"暗线"。 7月PPI继续磨底，大宗价格对PPI环比拉动虽转正，但统计上未囊括下旬的涨价情况，因而中上游PPI表 现不及高频数据。 PPI为每月5日、20日调查单价的简单平均值，而反内卷带动的涨价集中于下旬，因此 本月PPI（环比-0.2%）不及预期。高频数据也与PPI走势分化，7月煤、钢价格回升，而煤炭采选 （-1.5%）、黑色压延（-0.3%）环比仍为负。相比之下，油价、铜价对本月PPI贡献为正， 测算大宗商品 价格拉动PPI环比0.1%。 同时中下游价格对PPI拖累仍较大，也令7月PPI表现低于市场预期。 与2016年上游涨价向下游传导不同 的是，本轮供给过剩更多在中下游，导致上游涨价向下游传导受阻。如石化链下游PPI跌幅大于上游价格 理论传导幅度；机械设备、消费下游亦有类似特征， 测算7月中下游拖累PPI环比-0 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of the U.S. labor market, highlighting its fragile "tight balance" and the implications for future Federal Reserve interest rate decisions, particularly the likelihood of a rate cut in September 2025 [12]. Group 1: Hot Topics - The U.S. July employment data was weaker than market expectations, primarily due to significant downward revisions in employment figures for May and June [12]. - The article raises questions about whether the downward revisions are due to statistical factors or indicative of a weakening economy [12]. - The Federal Reserve's potential decision to cut interest rates in September is suggested to be increasingly likely [12]. Group 2: Monthly Outlook - The article presents a paradox regarding inflation expectations, driven by anti-involution trends, while actual price performance remains weak [13]. - It emphasizes the need to monitor how supply and demand dynamics will evolve and their impact on pricing [13]. - The average tariff rate in the U.S. increased to 18.3% after August 1, 2025, which may affect trade dynamics [24]. Group 3: Export Trends - In July, China's exports (in U.S. dollar terms) grew by 7.2% year-on-year, surpassing the expected 5.8% [19]. - Imports also showed a year-on-year increase of 4.1%, compared to an expected 0.3% [19]. Group 4: Domestic High-Frequency Data - There has been a significant decline in port cargo volumes, indicating a seasonal slowdown in industrial production and mixed performance in the construction sector [21]. - The article notes that the construction industry is experiencing varied levels of activity, contributing to the overall decline in cargo volumes [21].

Core Viewpoint - The decline in "export grabbing" to the US and improvement in exports to emerging markets may be due to expectations of transshipment and recovery in domestic demand [3][10][62] Group 1: Export Trends - In July, exports increased by 7.2% year-on-year, exceeding market expectations of 5.8% [2][9][62] - Exports to the US fell by 21.6%, a decline of 5.6 percentage points, while exports to Latin America and Africa rose significantly [3][10][62] - The export growth to emerging markets, such as Africa (+42.5%) and Latin America (+7.8%), indicates a shift in trade dynamics [3][10][62] Group 2: Factors Influencing Export Changes - The phenomenon of "export grabbing" to the US has declined, particularly in consumer electronics and toys, suggesting a reduction in demand from the US [3][18][62] - The announcement of a 40% tariff on transshipment goods by the US has led to increased demand from ASEAN and Latin American companies for imports from China [4][26][63] - The industrialization of emerging markets, particularly in Africa, has increased the demand for Chinese production materials, contributing to overall export growth [4][29][63] Group 3: Future Outlook - The implementation of the "reciprocal tariff 2.0" may create uncertainty for exports in August, as the necessity for "export grabbing" to emerging markets diminishes [5][32][64] - Despite the decline in port throughput, the high level of processing trade imports in July suggests that the drop in exports may be relatively controllable [5][32][64] Group 4: Import Trends - Imports increased by 4.1% year-on-year in July, driven by a recovery in bulk commodity imports [7][52][66] - Specific commodities such as copper (+18.0%), soybeans (+18.4%), and crude oil (+11.5%) showed significant increases, reflecting a rebound in domestic investment demand [7][53][66]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the need for a stable economic environment, focusing on employment, enterprises, markets, and expectations, while implementing proactive fiscal and moderate monetary policies [1][2][3] - The Central Political Bureau meeting on July 30 highlighted the importance of maintaining policy continuity and flexibility to promote domestic and international dual circulation, aiming to achieve the annual economic and social development goals [2][3] - The meeting also stressed the need for high-quality urban renewal and the preparation of the "14th Five-Year Plan" [1][2] Group 2 - The meeting with non-Party figures on July 23 gathered opinions on the current economic situation and emphasized the importance of stabilizing employment and enterprises while boosting consumption [3][4] - The U.S.-China economic talks in Stockholm on July 28-29 resulted in an agreement to extend the suspension of certain tariffs for 90 days, highlighting the mutual benefits of stable economic relations [5][6] - The implementation plan for childcare subsidies was announced, providing annual subsidies of 3,600 yuan per child for those under three years old starting January 1, 2025, with financial support from the central government [7][8] Group 3 - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) is seeking public input on guidelines for government investment funds, focusing on enhancing high-end capacity supply and avoiding investments in structurally problematic industries [9][10] - A multi-department meeting from July 24 to August 1 outlined key tasks for the second half of the year, emphasizing the need to expand domestic demand and improve market regulation [11][12] - The joint implementation plan for promoting agricultural product consumption aims to enhance supply quality and innovate distribution methods to stimulate market demand [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in the management of local government hidden debts in China, highlighting the increased accountability measures and the focus on grassroots government actions and project-related hidden debts [2][4][6]. Summary by Sections Hidden Debt Accountability Cases - Since the initiation of the new round of hidden debt resolution work in 2022, the Ministry of Finance has reported 44 typical cases of "hidden debt accountability," indicating a strengthened regulatory approach and deeper focus on local projects [2][12]. - The accountability cases are primarily concentrated in low-tier cities in central and western regions, with significant occurrences in provinces like Jiangxi, Henan, and Anhui [3][15]. Changes in 2025 Accountability Cases - The 2025 accountability cases show a shift towards focusing on grassroots government behavior and project construction-related hidden debts, reflecting a "penetrating" regulatory approach [4][17]. - The accountability cases in 2025 emphasize the actions of city, district, and county-level governments, with specific instances of violations related to project financing and management [20][23]. New Trends in Hidden Debt Allocation - New hidden debt allocations in 2025 include funds for repaying loans for shantytown renovation and high-standard farmland improvement projects, indicating a shift in the types of projects being financed through hidden debts [5][23]. - The trend shows that local governments are increasingly using hidden debts to cover construction costs and repay existing debts, reflecting financial pressures at the grassroots level [7][38]. Reform Signals Behind Hidden Debt Accountability - The changes in hidden debt accountability cases signal a heightened emphasis on high-quality construction and strict regulation of new hidden debts, as highlighted in recent central government meetings [6][31]. - The accountability measures also point to the need for reform in the fiscal relationship between central and local governments, particularly in addressing the financial pressures faced by local governments [7][38].

Group 1: Industrial Production Trends - The industrial production shows signs of seasonal weakness, but infrastructure construction is experiencing a slight recovery. The blast furnace operating rate and apparent consumption have both increased year-on-year, with a rise of +1.1 and +0.5 percentage points to 2.2% and -0.3% respectively [2][6] - The social inventory of steel has seen a rebound [2] - In the textile sector, operating rates are higher than the same period last year, while the polyester filament and automotive sectors have seen a decline in operating rates [14][20] Group 2: Cement and Construction Industry - Cement production and demand are recovering, with grinding operating rates increasing significantly by +6.0 percentage points to -0.2% year-on-year. Cement shipment rates have also improved by +0.8 percentage points to -2.2% [25][29] - The cement inventory ratio has slightly decreased by -0.5 percentage points to -0.2% [32] Group 3: Glass and Asphalt Production - Glass consumption has decreased, with production slightly rebounding but still down by -7.7% year-on-year. Apparent consumption has also fallen by -5.0 percentage points to 8.7% [37][41] - Asphalt operating rates have increased year-on-year, up by +2.5 percentage points to 8.0% [37] Group 4: Real Estate and Demand Trends - The transaction volume of commercial housing has declined, with a year-on-year decrease of -13.6 percentage points to -19.6% in 30 major cities. The largest drop is observed in third-tier cities, with a decline of -44.0 percentage points to -31.5% [49][50] - National railway and highway freight volumes have also decreased, with year-on-year declines of -0.5 percentage points to 6.5% and -0.8 percentage points to 2.8% respectively [60][64] Group 5: Export and Shipping Trends - The shipping prices continue to decline, with the CCFI composite index dropping by -2.3% week-on-week. The Southeast Asia route has seen a significant price drop of -3.9% [89][90] - The BDI average price has also decreased by -3.1% [89] Group 6: Price Trends in Agriculture and Industry - Agricultural product prices are showing divergence, with pork and fruit prices falling by -0.3% and -0.2% respectively, while vegetable and egg prices have increased by +0.6% and +3.6% [101][105] - The industrial product prices have generally declined, with the Nanhua Industrial Price Index dropping by -1.4% [113][114]