Group 1: Economic Uncertainty Factors - The correlation coefficients for economic uncertainty factors and policy factors across provinces in 2024 are 0.70 and 0.72, respectively, indicating that larger provinces face greater economic uncertainty and policy support[3] - Provinces are categorized into three groups based on the relationship between economic uncertainty factors and policy factors: 14 provinces with higher economic uncertainty than policy support (48% of national GDP), 16 provinces with lower economic uncertainty (48% of national GDP), and Beijing where both factors are approximately equal[3] - Provinces with economic uncertainty factors lower than policy factors show better GDP growth, averaging 5.1%, compared to 4.76% for those with higher uncertainty[3] Group 2: Real Estate Factor - In 2024, the real estate industry chain's contribution to GDP for six major economic provinces is 14.1%, compared to the national average of 13.5%[4] - The land finance dependency for major economic provinces is significantly higher, with an average of 41% compared to the national average of 24.3%[4] - Provinces like Jiangsu, Sichuan, and Shandong have land finance dependency exceeding 40%[4] Group 3: Export Factor - The six major economic provinces account for 65% of national exports, significantly higher than their 44% share of national GDP[5] - The export-to-GDP ratio for eastern coastal provinces is 28.6%, compared to the national average of 18.8% and much lower ratios for western provinces[5] - Provinces such as Zhejiang and Guangdong have export-to-GDP ratios of 43.3% and 41.6%, respectively, indicating a strong reliance on exports[5] Group 4: Policy Factor - The total central government subsidies for 2024 are estimated at 11.3 trillion CNY, with major economic provinces receiving only 23.5% of this, which is lower than their GDP share of 44.4%[8] - The net financing from local debts and credits for major economic provinces is 40.7%, also below their GDP share of 44.4%[9] - The financial resources allocated to major economic provinces have been declining, with their share of social financing dropping from 53% in 2022 to 48% in 2024[9]

证 券 研 究 报 告 【债券分析】 关税豁免期临近到期，关注贸易格局演变 ——6 月海外月度观察 油价：6 月，国际原油先受中美元首通话提振油需前景，后受中东局势引发 供给担忧双重因素带动下强势上涨至 75.60 美元/桶，随后中东局势缓和，油 价回落至 64.92 美元/桶。 美国就业市场超预期疲软；金融市场流动性紧缩。 债券研究 经济方面，全球制造业景气度收缩，服务业保持高景气度。贸易方面，波罗 的海干散货指数先升后降，5 月前 20 日韩国出口同比跌幅收缩至-2.5%。货 币政策方面，关税政策加剧经济前景的不确定性，主要央行保持谨慎态度。 财政政策方面，德国政府内阁批准 2025 年财政预算草案和 2026 年财政预 算框架。 ❖ 发达经济体：关税冲击经济前景，通胀继续降温 美国经济景气度回落，制造业和服务业景气度均处于收缩区间；劳动力市场 温和走弱，时薪增速超预期；通胀继续降温，关税影响暂未体现；零售销售 继续走弱，消费者支出放缓；房贷利率居高不下以及持续上涨的房价加剧居 民购房负担。英国、日本制造业和服务业景气度分化，欧元区增长乏力。通 胀方面，欧元区、英国通胀降温，日本通胀水平继续处于政策目标上 ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 美光科技（MU）FY2025Q3 业绩点评及业绩说明会纪要 HBM 带动强劲增长，FY25Q3 业绩超预期 会议地点：线上 ❖ 事项： 2025 年 6 月 26 日，美光科技发布 FY25 Q3 报告，并召开业绩说明会。 ❖ 评论： 1. 总 体业 绩 情况 ：FY2025Q3 实现营 收 93.01 亿美元（QoQ+15.5%， YoY+36.6%），高于指引中值（指引中值为 88 亿美元），营收环比增长主要受 益于终端市场增长，其中数据中心收入创纪录，消费者导向的市场也实现强劲 环比增长。FY25Q3 的 Non-gaap 毛利率为 39.0%（QoQ+1.1pct，YoY+10.9pct）， 超过指引区间上限（指引为 36.5%上下浮动 100 个基点），主要得益于 DRAM 和 NAND 价格上涨。FY25Q3 公司 DRAM 收入创下新高，主要得益于 HBM 收入环比增长近 50%。 2. 数据中心市场预期及进展情况：美光 FY25Q3 数据中心 DRAM 收入连续第 四个季度创下新高，得益于 HBM 带来的强劲增长，以及行业领先的高容量 DIMM 和低功耗服务器 DRAM ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 生猪行业 5 月跟踪报告 价格小幅回落，体重延续上行 行业研究 农林牧渔 2025 年 06 月 27 日 推荐（维持） 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：陈鹏 电话：021-20572579 邮箱：chenpeng1@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360521080002 行业基本数据 | | | 占比% | | --- | --- | --- | | 股票家数(只) | 101 | 0.01 | | 总市值(亿元) | 13,111.51 | 1.27 | | 流通市值(亿元) | 9,904.42 | 1.22 | 相对指数表现 | % | 1M | 6M | 12M | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 绝对表现 | 2.2% | 7.1% | 9.8% | | 相对表现 | -0.0% | 8.2% | -3.6% | -16% -3% 10% 22% 24/06 24/09 24/11 25/01 25/04 25/06 2024-06-26~2025-06-26 农林牧渔 沪深300 相关研究报告 《华创农业 5 月白羽肉禽月报：毛鸡、鸡苗价格 保持平 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" recommendation for the liquor industry, specifically for leading companies in the sector [2]. Core Viewpoints - The liquor industry is currently undergoing extreme pressure testing due to weak demand and intensified policy enforcement, leading to an anticipated bottoming out around mid-year [12][19]. - It is suggested that leading liquor companies should lower their annual growth targets to stabilize pricing systems and build long-term brand value [7][22]. - The report emphasizes the importance of monitoring policy execution and the adjustment of annual targets by liquor companies as key indicators for market recovery [9][19]. Summary by Sections Industry Overview - The liquor industry is facing significant challenges, including a weak demand environment and strict policy enforcement that has led to a decline in consumption [12][13]. - The total market capitalization of the liquor sector is approximately 30,170.68 billion, with 20 listed companies [3]. Performance Metrics - The absolute performance of the liquor sector has declined by 5.8% over the past month, 8.8% over six months, and 6.0% over the past year [4]. Policy Impact - Recent government policies aimed at reducing waste and curbing extravagant spending have negatively impacted liquor consumption, particularly in the restaurant sector [12][13]. - The report notes that the execution of these policies has varied by region, with some areas experiencing stricter enforcement than others [14]. Investment Logic - The report identifies three perspectives on the safety margin for leading liquor companies: high dividend yields, low price-to-earnings ratios, and potential for increased institutional investment [8]. - Leading companies like Moutai and Wuliangye are highlighted for their strong market positions and attractive dividend yields, which exceed 4% [8]. Comparative Analysis - The report compares Moutai and Pop Mart, noting that both possess strong consumer, collectible, and financial attributes, but differ in demand elasticity and product matrix [24][27]. - Moutai's demand is driven by consumption and gifting, while Pop Mart relies on its IP-driven product strategy [25][27]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests that investors should focus on acquiring shares of leading liquor companies during this strategic bottoming phase, as the long-term commercial attributes remain strong despite short-term pressures [7][8]. - Specific recommendations include Moutai, Gujing, and Wuliangye as primary targets for investment [8].

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given content. Core Viewpoints of the Report The research on the regulatory framework, fund operation, bond - allocation behavior, and the latest characteristics of the bank wealth - management industry's development is of great reference value for bond - market trend analysis. The bank wealth - management sector currently faces challenges such as the rectification of net - value smoothing methods, difficulty in achieving performance benchmarks in a low - interest - rate environment, and potential shrinkage of small and medium - sized banks' wealth - management scale, which may affect bond - allocation preferences. The report also provides strategies for bond investment to respond to the institutional behavior changes of bank wealth - management [7]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Overview of Bank Wealth - Management Bond Allocation - As of the end of 2024, the bank wealth - management bond - allocation scale reached 18.6 trillion yuan, ranking third in the market and accounting for 10.5% of the 177 - trillion - yuan balance of China's bond - market custody. In recent years, affected by the redemption wave, the growth rate of bank wealth - management bond allocation first declined and then rebounded. Bank wealth - management prefers credit bonds and certificates of deposit in bond - allocation [1][13]. 2. Wealth - Management Regulatory Rules: A Multi - layer Regulatory Framework Led by the New Asset Management Regulations (1) Evolution of Wealth - Management Supervision - Since the introduction of the New Asset Management Regulations in 2018, a multi - layer regulatory framework of "New Asset Management Regulations - Wealth - Management Regulations and Wealth - Management Company Regulations + Supporting Rules for Wealth - Management Business Supervision + Valuation Methods + Window Guidance" has been formed. The New Asset Management Regulations initiated the era of net - value transformation, while the Wealth - Management Regulations and Wealth - Management Company Regulations carried out wealth - management business in a dual - track system [19]. (2) Regulatory Details of Bank Wealth - Management Product Investment and Operation - **Investment Scope**: Private - placement wealth management has a wider investment scope than public - placement wealth management, and public - placement wealth management can invest in non - standard assets and large - denomination certificates of deposit to increase returns compared with public - offering funds. There are also slight differences in supervision between commercial banks and wealth - management subsidiaries [25]. - **Investment Ratio**: The 80% investment ratio of major asset classes is the basis for product - type classification. The upper limit of non - standard asset investment is 35%. The liquidity - asset ratio requirement is similar to that of funds, and the credit - rating limit for cash - management products is in line with that of money - market funds. The concentration limit basically follows the requirements of the New Asset Management Regulations, with an exception clause for investment in index bond funds [2][30]. - **Leverage and Maturity Requirements**: The leverage requirements are the same as those of funds, with upper limits of 120%, 140%, and 200%. The maturity requirements aim to reduce the risk of maturity mismatch [2]. - **Valuation Method Requirements**: Specific products can use the amortized cost method, including cash - management wealth management and closed - end wealth management with the mixed - valuation method. The amortized cost method also needs to meet the requirements of the "Accounting Treatment Provisions for Asset Management Products". Market - value method requires the use of third - party valuation, and the means of smoothing net value have been gradually rectified [2]. 3. Bank Wealth - Management Operation: How to Respond to Net - Value Transformation? (1) Source of Funds - Since 2022, the wealth - management scale has gone through three stages: "fluctuating growth - redemption shrinkage - recovery growth". Individual investors are the main participants, preferring low - volatility and stable products. The proportion of parent - bank sales has been continuously declining [3][51]. (2) Asset Allocation - **Major Asset Allocation**: After the redemption wave in 2022, bank wealth - management increased the allocation of monetary assets and managed liquidity more through outsourced funds. The proportion of trust companies as the main outsourced channel increased due to their valuation advantages [3]. - **Bond - Asset Investment**: After the redemption wave, the bond - allocation scale of wealth management first shrank and then recovered. Currently, it is still mainly credit bonds, but the proportion of low - volatility inter - bank certificates of deposit is increasing. The proportion of outsourced investment has exceeded that of direct investment, showing the characteristics of "direct investment for stable net value and outsourced investment for higher returns" [3]. 4. New Developments: Challenges and Countermeasures for Bank Wealth - Management to Stabilize Net Value - **Challenge 1: Rectification of Wealth - Management Net - Value Smoothing Methods**: Since 2023, the proportion of wealth - management products with a net value below par has been generally controllable thanks to various net - value smoothing methods. However, since 2024, many smoothing methods have been rectified. In 2025, direct investment in bank wealth management increased capital lending and still controlled relatively short durations, while outsourced investment became more conservative [4][8]. - **Challenge 2: Difficulty in Achieving Wealth - Management Performance Benchmarks in a Low - Interest - Rate Bond Market**: In a tight - money environment, wealth management may increase lending and allocate more short - term bonds. In a low - interest - rate environment, it may increase the allocation of equity assets [4][8]. - **Challenge 3: Potential Shrinkage of Small and Medium - Sized Banks' Wealth - Management Scale**: According to news reports, the wealth - management scale of small and medium - sized banks may shrink, with the proposed rectification volume around 3.5 trillion yuan, accounting for about 12%. Wealth - management subsidiaries of large - state - owned banks may undertake the capital gap of small and medium - sized banks' wealth management, and the allocation demand for some inter - bank certificates of deposit and corporate bonds may shift to cash, bank deposits, and financial bonds [4][8]. 5. How Should Bond Investment Respond to the Institutional Behavior Changes of Wealth Management? - **Grasp the Seasonal Bond - Allocation Rules**: In April, July, and from October to November, there are usually opportunities for the credit spreads of 1 - year AAA inter - bank certificates of deposit and AAA short - and medium - term notes within 1 year to compress [5][8]. - **Track Redemption Waves**: Divide redemption waves into small - scale and large - scale ones according to the degree of negative feedback in the bond market. Use product net value, product scale, and spot - bond trading as the key indicators to track the redemption pressure of various products, and grasp the investment opportunities in redemption waves in different stages [5][9]. - **Pay Attention to Leading Indicators and Be Alert to the Risk of Wealth - Management Net - Value Fluctuation**: Observe whether the wealth - management safety cushion turns negative and whether the seasonal decline in wealth - management scale exceeds the fund - holding position. Before these situations occur, the risk of wealth - management net - value retracement is controllable [5][9].

Group 1: Long-term Trends - The U.S. economic share has declined from 28.3% in 2000 to 23.6% in 2023, while the dollar index has increased, indicating a long-term divergence[12][16]. - The dollar index has maintained a fluctuation center around 103-104, despite the U.S. economic share dropping, which historically corresponds to a 27%-28% economic share[12][16]. - The increase in the dollar index post-2008 is attributed to a liquidity expansion and the relative weakness of the Eurozone and Japan[15][16]. Group 2: Short-term Dynamics - Since April 2023, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose from approximately 4.2% to a peak of about 4.58%, while the dollar index fell from around 104 to 99, showing a negative correlation[27][29]. - In April 2023, foreign investors sold $589 billion in U.S. long-term securities, with $472 billion being U.S. Treasuries, indicating a significant outflow of capital[30][29]. - The net short positions in dollar index futures surged from 2,010 contracts at the end of March to 11,000 contracts by mid-June, reflecting a strong consensus against the dollar[36][43]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The consensus suggests that the dollar may not enter a prolonged downtrend in the next year, as U.S. nominal GDP growth is expected to remain competitive against the Eurozone and Japan[25][57]. - The current low concentration of net short positions indicates a higher risk of a dollar rebound, as historical data shows that extreme positioning often leads to reversals[43][57]. - The dollar's rapid decline may have reached its peak, and caution is advised regarding potential short-term rebounds due to extreme positioning in the market[57][57].

Investment Rating - The report gives a "Strong Buy" rating for the company, Yuchip Technology (688049), with a target price of 76.84 CNY based on a 65x PE for 2025 [2][11]. Core Viewpoints - Yuchip Technology is a leading domestic low-power AIoT chip design manufacturer, focusing on the mid-to-high-end smart audio SoC sector. The company has established itself as a mainstream supplier in the Bluetooth speaker SoC market and is expanding into wireless microphones, home theaters, and wearable products [8][9][11]. - The company is expected to achieve significant revenue and profit growth in 2024 and 2025, driven by an increase in market share and the launch of new products. The projected revenue for 2024 is 652 million CNY, with a year-on-year growth of 25.3%, and a net profit of 107 million CNY, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 63.8% [2][30]. Company Overview - Yuchip Technology specializes in the research, design, and sales of mid-to-high-end smart audio SoC chips, with applications in various products such as Bluetooth speakers, smart wearables, and AIoT devices. The company has a diverse product matrix that includes smart wireless audio SoC chips, low-latency high-quality audio SoC chips, smart wearable SoC chips, and edge AI processor chips [19][20]. - The company has a stable and concentrated shareholding structure, with the controlling shareholder being the Taiwan Yeh family, ensuring consistent decision-making and strategic direction [24][26]. Financial Performance - The company is projected to achieve a net profit of 173 million CNY in 2025, 235 million CNY in 2026, and 317 million CNY in 2027, indicating strong growth potential [2][11]. - The revenue from the wireless audio SoC chip segment is the largest contributor to the company's income, accounting for over 74% of total revenue in recent years. The gross margin for this segment has been increasing, reaching 48.94% in 2024 [34][35]. Industry Analysis - The Bluetooth technology upgrade is driving the expansion of application scenarios, with the market for smart audio SoC chips expected to grow significantly. The structural recovery of the Bluetooth speaker market and innovations in wearable products are anticipated to further boost demand [10][11]. - The company is well-positioned to benefit from the ongoing energy efficiency revolution, with its innovative CIM architecture addressing the challenges of traditional computing structures. This positions Yuchip Technology as a leader in the low-power edge AI market [9][10].

证券研究报 告 【策略专题】 分红能力盘点：周期&公用篇 ——自由现金流资产系列 12 工业金属：25Q1 现金流比例 33%，具备较大股东回报提升空间 石化：25Q1 现金流比例 26%，盈利周期熨平、现金流稳定 港口： 25Q1 现金流比例 33%，市场或已充分认知其稳定现金创造能力 2）行业逻辑演变带来现金流改善：航运受益于近年来地缘事件频繁、运价 大波动的时代背景，农业则正发生开支周期转向平稳阶段的积极变化： 航运：25Q1 现金流比例 41%，地缘事件频繁、运价大波动时代 农业：25Q1 现金流比例 34%，开支周期进入平稳阶段 3）景气周期承压：虽然资本开支力度下降，但 EPS 压力较大，包括煤炭、 钢铁、建材、航空机场、地产： 煤炭：25Q1 现金流比例 25%，煤价下跌与开支高位持续矛盾 钢铁：25Q1 现金流比例 42%，去库影响显著 建材：25Q1 现金流比例 28%，股东回报提升空间有限 航空机场：25Q1 现金流比例 64%，盈利规模与疫情前接近 地产：25Q1 现金流阶段性修复，去库补充现金流 4）仍处高资本开支阶段：资本开支力度均在 2 以上，行业逻辑仍以扩张为 主，包括贵金属、能 ...

Investment Rating - The report gives a "Strong Buy" rating for Hunan Haili, with a target price of 9.9 CNY per share [2][11]. Core Viewpoints - Hunan Haili is a leading company in the carbamate pesticide industry, leveraging its strong R&D capabilities and abundant resources to maintain a dominant market position. The company is expected to benefit from the recovery of the pesticide industry and the expansion of its unique product, Methyl Pyrimidine Phosphorus [7][9][10]. - The report anticipates significant revenue growth for the company, projecting revenues of 2,471 million CNY in 2024, increasing to 4,775 million CNY by 2027, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34% from 2024 to 2027 [3][11]. Financial Summary - **Revenue Forecast**: - 2024: 2,471 million CNY - 2025: 3,243 million CNY (31.3% YoY growth) - 2026: 4,016 million CNY (23.8% YoY growth) - 2027: 4,775 million CNY (18.9% YoY growth) [3][11] - **Net Profit Forecast**: - 2024: 265 million CNY - 2025: 368 million CNY (38.6% YoY growth) - 2026: 502 million CNY (36.5% YoY growth) - 2027: 633 million CNY (26.0% YoY growth) [3][11] - **Earnings Per Share (EPS)**: - 2024: 0.47 CNY - 2025: 0.66 CNY - 2026: 0.90 CNY - 2027: 1.13 CNY [3][11] - **Valuation Ratios**: - Price-to-Earnings (PE) Ratio: Expected to decrease from 15 in 2025 to 6 in 2027 - Price-to-Book (PB) Ratio: Expected to decrease from 1.3 in 2025 to 1.0 in 2027 [3][11]. Company Overview - Hunan Haili is recognized as the first listed company in Hunan Province, with a strong backing from the Hunan Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission [15][24]. - The company has established a robust production capacity of 28,000 tons for carbamate pesticides, with additional capacity being released from its Ningxia base [7][9][10]. Industry Insights - The carbamate pesticide sector is expected to experience a recovery due to the increasing demand for high-toxicity traditional pesticides, which are currently in short supply [7][9][45]. - The global pesticide market has shown a consistent growth trend, with an average annual growth rate of approximately 4.2% from 2017 to 2023, driven by the rising global population [46][49].