Inflation Data Summary - November CPI year-on-year increased by 0.7%, matching expectations, and up from 0.2% in the previous month[1] - Core CPI, excluding food and energy, remained at 1.2% year-on-year, with a month-on-month decrease of 0.1%[1] - PPI year-on-year decreased by 2.2%, slightly worse than the expected -2.0%, and unchanged from the previous month[1] Key Drivers of CPI Changes - Food prices rose by 0.5% month-on-month, significantly above the seasonal average of -0.5%, primarily driven by a 7.2% increase in fresh vegetable prices due to supply shocks[2] - Non-food items showed resilience, with clothing prices up 0.7% and medical services prices increasing by 0.3% for eight consecutive months[2] - Service prices fell by 0.4% month-on-month, negatively impacting core CPI, particularly due to a 5.7% drop in tourism-related prices[2] PPI Insights - PPI has shown a month-on-month increase of 0.1% for two consecutive months, indicating stabilization in industrial product prices[3] - The mining sector saw a significant month-on-month increase of 1.7%, while the raw materials sector experienced a decline of 0.2%[3] - Manufacturing prices in high-weight sectors like photovoltaic equipment and lithium-ion batteries showed reduced year-on-year declines, supporting PPI stability[4] Future Outlook - December inflation readings are expected to remain stable, with CPI likely holding at 0.7% year-on-year if month-on-month changes align with seasonal trends[7] - PPI year-on-year may narrow to -2.0% if the recovery trend continues[7] - The necessity for monetary policy adjustments may increase due to inflation trends and PMI remaining below the growth threshold[7]

Market Overview - On December 10, the stock market experienced a decline while the bond market saw gains, continuing the seesaw effect observed recently[1] - The total trading volume of the Wande All A index was 1.79 trillion yuan, a decrease of 126.1 billion yuan compared to December 9[1] - The Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng Technology Index rose by 0.42% and 0.48%, respectively, with net outflow of southbound funds amounting to 1.018 billion HKD[2] Equity Market Insights - The Wande All A index rebounded after touching a support level around 6230, indicating a strong support[1] - The current market is in the second phase of a recovery trend, with potential resistance at the October high point[1] - Consumer sectors are highlighted as market beneficiaries due to low-value discovery and policy dynamics, with the food and beverage sector showing a return of -8.05% year-to-date[2] Bond Market Dynamics - Recent market concerns have been addressed, with expectations for a "loose monetary policy" remaining intact despite a shift in policy tone[3] - The November CPI and PPI data showed year-on-year changes of 0.7% and -2.2%, respectively, indicating a moderate recovery in inflation[3] - Fund institutions, previously cautious, have resumed buying in the bond market, with notable performance in 30-year and 10-year government bonds[4] Liquidity and Fund Flows - The People's Bank of China shifted from net withdrawal to net injection, with a net injection of 110.5 billion yuan on December 10[4] - Despite low interest rates, net inflows for funds and brokerages have not significantly increased, remaining below the quarterly average[5] - The stability of fund liabilities and the presence of incremental capital will be crucial for a potential year-end rally in the bond market[5] Risk Factors - Potential unexpected adjustments in monetary policy could impact market conditions[6] - Changes in liquidity levels may also lead to unforeseen market fluctuations[6] - Fiscal policy adjustments in response to economic slowdowns could further influence market dynamics[6]

证券研究报告|宏观研究报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 12 月 10 日 [Table_Title] 2026 债市，或比预期好一点 [Table_Title2] 2026 年投资展望系列之四 [Table_Summary] ► 2025，跌宕起伏 不同于 2023-2024 年的一帆风顺，2025 年的债市可谓是极具挑战。 长端利率的下行趋势早在年初便被打断，之后种种事件接力成为债市定价 主线，多空双方频繁上演"你方唱罢我登台"的戏码，激烈博弈之间，利 率走势大起大落。 2025 年同样是债市投资的变革之年，利率行情从"牛长熊短"切换 至"牛短熊长"，获取收益的难度呈指数级上升。一方面，上一年末的抢 跑行情，透支了来年的收益空间；另一方面，传统的定价框架遭遇挑战， 货币政策对"弱现实"不再敏感，风险资产沉寂多年之后觉醒，成为影响 利率定价的关键变量。 这些变化的背后，宽财政、稳货币、强风偏、严监管、弱现实，成为 关键词。宽财政和稳货币，奠定了债市震荡的格局；强风偏和严监管，营 造了牛短熊长的氛围；弱现实，成为被市场忽视的变量。这些变量在 2026 是否会延续，未来的行情又会如何演绎？ 请仔细阅 ...

Market Overview - On December 9, the stock and bond markets exhibited a seesaw trend, with bonds rising and stocks falling. The overall A-share market declined by 0.55% with a trading volume of 1.92 trillion yuan, down 133.9 billion yuan from the previous day[1] - The Hang Seng Index fell by 1.29%, while the Hang Seng Technology Index dropped by 1.90%. Southbound capital saw a net inflow of 531 million HKD, with Tencent, Xiaomi, and Alibaba receiving net inflows of 878 million HKD, 540 million HKD, and 425 million HKD respectively[1] Sector Performance - The concentration of trading volume reached 45%, indicating a historical high, with technology sectors, particularly AI computing, driving this concentration. Other sectors, such as non-ferrous metals and liquor, experienced significant declines[2] - Consumer sectors are becoming a focus for capital, particularly those related to policy, such as ice and snow tourism, and tech-related consumption like consumer electronics and digital marketing[2] Bond Market Dynamics - The bond market showed mixed performance, with most bonds closing in the green, but intraday rates fluctuated. The long-end rates initially opened lower by about 1 basis point but later turned upward due to market speculation on potential easing of bank economic value sensitivity indicators[4] - Despite a slight recovery in bond market sentiment, there remains pressure from redemptions in medium and short-term bond funds, indicating a cautious outlook for the bond market in the near term[7] Commodity Market Trends - The commodity market saw widespread declines, with precious metals like gold and silver down by 0.92% and 0.68% respectively. Industrial metals also faced downward pressure, with aluminum and copper dropping by 1.67% and 1.46%[7] - The market experienced a significant net outflow of 8.4 billion yuan in commodities, reflecting a lack of sustained bullish sentiment. Non-ferrous metals and precious metals were the main areas of capital outflow[8] Risk Factors - Potential risks include unexpected adjustments in monetary policy, liquidity changes, and fiscal policy shifts, which could impact market stability and investor sentiment[10]

Export Performance - In November 2025, total exports reached $330.4 billion, a year-on-year increase of 5.9%, exceeding market expectations of 3.0% and reversing the previous month's decline of -1.1%[1] - Exports to the EU, Africa, and Latin America improved significantly, contributing 1.9 percentage points, 1.5 percentage points, and 1.0 percentage points to overall export growth, respectively[1] - Exports to ASEAN, China's largest trading partner, saw a marginal slowdown, with year-on-year growth decreasing by 1.9 percentage points to 8.6%, marking the first single-digit growth since February of the same year[1] Trade with the United States - Exports to the U.S. fell by 3.2% month-on-month in November, with a year-on-year decline of 28.8%, the lowest in three months, remaining within the -25% to -30% range[2] - The decline in exports to the U.S. was influenced by high base effects from last year, where exports peaked at $47.3 billion in November 2024 due to anticipatory stockpiling ahead of tariff increases[2] Product Categories - The export growth rate for electromechanical products and high-tech products improved, with electromechanical exports rising by 9.8% and high-tech products by 7.8%, both nearing the average levels seen in the first nine months of the year[3] - Labor-intensive product exports saw a reduced decline from -14.8% to -8.2%, although this remains low compared to the average decline of around 5% in August and September[3] Import Trends - Total imports in November amounted to $218.7 billion, with a year-on-year increase of 1.9%, slightly above the previous month's 1.0%[4] - Imports of electromechanical and high-tech products improved, contributing 5.5 percentage points to overall import growth, while bulk commodity imports turned negative, declining by 1.0% year-on-year[5] Regional Economic Performance - Neighboring economies also showed strong export performance, with South Korea's exports rising by 8.4% year-on-year in November, up from 3.6% in October[6] - Vietnam's exports experienced a slight slowdown to 15.8% year-on-year but maintained double-digit growth[6] Future Outlook - Despite high base effects, November's export performance is expected to support a rebound in industrial value-added growth year-on-year[7] - The resilience of exports is anticipated to continue, bolstered by competitive pricing of manufactured goods, although fluctuations may occur in the coming months due to previous stockpiling effects[7]

证券研究报告|行业研究报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 12 月 8 日 [Table_Title] 第一量子 2025Q3 铜产量同比减少 9.9%至 10.46 万 吨，销量同比增加 6.0%至 11.88 万吨，归属于公 司股东的净利润为-4800 万美元 [Table_Title2] 有色金属-海外季报 [Table_Summary] 季报重点内容: ► 生产经营情况 1）铜 公司 2025Q3 铜产量为 10.46 万吨，同比减少 9.9%，环比增长 14.9%。 2025Q3 净实现金价为 3358 美元/盎司，同比上涨 40.9%，环比 上涨 6.1%。 ►财务业绩情况 2025Q3 销售收入为 13.46 亿美元，同比增长 5.2%，环比增长 9.8%。 公司 2025Q3 铜销量为 11.88 万吨，同比增加 6.0%，环比增加 17.4%。 2025Q3 铜 C1 现金成本为 1.95 美元/磅，同比上涨 24.2%，环 比下跌 2.5%。 2025Q3 铜总维持成本（AISC）为 3.07 美元/磅，同比上涨 26.9%，环比下跌 6.4%。 2025Q3 铜生产总成本为 3 ...

证券研究报告|宏观点评报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 12 月 08 日 第三，存量和增量。本次会议两个地方提到"存量和增量"，一是继续实施更加积极的财政政策和适度宽松 的货币政策，发挥存量政策和增量政策集成效应；二是持续扩大内需、优化供给，做优增量、盘活存量。这说明 26 年政策兼顾存量和增量，要将资源从低效存量转移出来以优化结构，而并非单纯在增量政策上发力做大总 量。与此同时，扩内需同样注重盘活存量。发挥存量政策和增量政策集成效应，切实提升宏观经济治理效能，也 与注重质效、跨周期调节相呼应。此外，货币适度宽松和财政更加积极的修饰词并无变化，关注中央经济工作会 议的详细表述。 第四，持续扩大内需，更好统筹国内经济工作和国际经贸斗争。本次会议再次提到"国际经贸斗争"，而今 年 7 月会议时未曾提及相关表述，当时正值中美经贸关系缓和期。当前中美经贸关系仍然处于缓和期，重提"国 际经贸斗争"，如何理解？在今年一季度美国加征关税之后，4 月政治局会议首次提出"国际经贸斗争"这一重 大判断。尽管当前中美经贸关系已经明显缓和，但部分欧洲、亚洲国家（如荷兰、日本等）在经贸等领域时有挑 请仔细阅读在本报告尾部 ...

Investment Rating - Industry rating: Recommended [5] Core Insights - In Q3 2025, the company's own copper production decreased by 1% year-on-year to 239,600 tons, but increased by 36% quarter-on-quarter, primarily due to improved grades from KCC, Antapaccay, and Antamina mines [2][4] - Cobalt production in Q3 2025 was 9,600 tons, a 9% decrease year-on-year but a 2% increase quarter-on-quarter [2] - Zinc production increased by 8% year-on-year to 244,200 tons, while lead and nickel production saw year-on-year decreases of 13% [2] - Silver production increased by 18% year-on-year to 5,721,000 ounces, while gold production decreased by 16% year-on-year to 147,000 ounces [3][2] - The Democratic Republic of Congo has lifted its cobalt export ban, setting annual quotas for 2026 and 2027 at 87,000 tons, with a remaining quota of 18,125 tons for the rest of 2025 [8][12] Summary by Sections Q3 2025 Production Overview - Copper production: 239,600 tons, down 1% YoY, up 36% QoQ [2] - Cobalt production: 9,600 tons, down 9% YoY, up 2% QoQ [2] - Zinc production: 244,200 tons, up 8% YoY, down 3% QoQ [2] - Lead production: 41,800 tons, down 13% YoY, up 2% QoQ [2] - Nickel production: 15,800 tons, down 13% YoY, down 11% QoQ [2] - Gold production: 147,000 ounces (4.57 tons), down 16% YoY, down 6% QoQ [2] - Silver production: 5,721,000 ounces (177.94 tons), up 18% YoY, up 18% QoQ [3] Year-to-Date Production Overview - Total copper production for the first three quarters of 2025 was 583,500 tons, a decrease of 12.17 million tons (17%) compared to the same period in 2024 [4] - Cobalt production for the same period was 28,500 tons, an increase of 2,000 tons (8%) YoY [6] - Zinc production for the first three quarters was 709,400 tons, an increase of 10% YoY [6] Future Production Guidance - The company expects copper production for FY 2025 to be between 850,000 and 875,000 tons [10] - Cobalt production guidance for FY 2025 is set at 41,000 to 43,000 tons [10] - Zinc production guidance for FY 2025 is between 950,000 and 975,000 tons [10]

Investment Rating - Industry Rating: Recommended [5] Core Insights - In Q3 2025, Freeport's copper production decreased by 5.2% quarter-on-quarter to 413,700 tons, with a year-on-year decline of 13.1% due to a mud leak incident at PTFI and declining ore grades [2][3] - The average realized price for copper in Q3 2025 was $4.68 per pound, reflecting an increase of 8.8% year-on-year and 3.1% quarter-on-quarter [2] - The average unit net cash cost for copper was $1.40 per pound, up 0.7% year-on-year and 23.9% quarter-on-quarter, but below the guidance of $1.59 per pound in July 2025 [3][4] - Gold production in Q3 2025 was 287,000 ounces, down 37.1% year-on-year and 9.5% quarter-on-quarter, primarily due to the same mud leak incident [7] - Molybdenum production in Q3 2025 was 22 million pounds, a decrease of 32.5% year-on-year, while the average realized price increased by 5.2% year-on-year to $24.07 per pound [8] Summary by Sections Production and Sales - Q3 2025 copper production was 912 million pounds, with sales of 977 million pounds, both showing declines compared to the previous year [14] - Q3 2025 gold sales were 336,000 ounces, down 39.8% year-on-year [14] - Q3 2025 molybdenum sales were 19 million pounds, remaining stable year-on-year [14] Financial Performance - Q3 2025 revenue was $6.972 billion, a year-on-year increase of 2.7% [15] - Operating income for Q3 2025 was $1.972 billion, up 1.8% year-on-year [15] - Net income attributable to common stock was $674 million, with earnings per share of $0.46, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 28.1% [15] Future Outlook - For 2025, total expected sales are approximately 3.5 billion pounds of copper, 1.05 million ounces of gold, and 82 million pounds of molybdenum, with a significant portion of production expected to ramp up in late 2025 and 2026 [9][10] - The Grasberg mine is set to resume large-scale production in Q2 2026, with anticipated copper and gold production levels expected to match 2025 estimates [13]

Group 1 - The report emphasizes the importance of identifying trend strength through moving average strategies, which can help in recognizing market trends effectively [3][4][9] - It introduces three key moving average indicators: moving average arrangement score, moving average dispersion distance, and moving average time series change, which collectively help in assessing market trends [8][10][13] - The report suggests that a higher composite score indicates a stronger upward trend, while a lower score suggests a stronger downward trend [13][21] Group 2 - The report outlines a funding flow strategy that aggregates various funding flow indicators to identify market consensus, focusing on both institutional and retail investor behaviors [26][28] - It highlights the significance of funding flow volatility over mere funding direction, suggesting that stable funding behavior can indicate potential market reversals [31][41] - The report proposes a combined approach of trend strength and funding consensus to select indices with clear trends and stable funding, enhancing investment decision-making [42][39] Group 3 - The report presents historical performance data for industry rotation and ETF rotation strategies, showing annual returns and excess returns compared to equal-weighted benchmarks [50][52] - It indicates that the industry rotation strategy has shown significant excess returns in certain years, particularly in 2020 with a return of 76.84% [50] - The ETF rotation strategy also demonstrated strong performance in 2019 and 2020, with excess returns of 30.33% and 26.62% respectively [52]