Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided Group 2: Core Viewpoints of the Report - The bond market may gradually recover in an oscillatory and progressive manner as the correlation between stocks and bonds weakens and commodity pressure eases, but other markets, seasonal factors, and regulatory policies may cause oscillations during the recovery process. It is recommended to adopt a dumbbell - shaped operation, and long - term bond rates may decline more smoothly in the second half of the fourth quarter, with rates expected to hit new lows this year [4][6][18] Group 3: Summary by Relevant Content Bond Market Performance This Week - This week, both long - term and short - term bonds remained oscillating. The active bonds of 10 - year and 30 - year treasury bonds, 250011.IB and 2500002.IB, changed by - 1.25bps and 0.95bps respectively compared with last week, reaching 1.77% and 2.03%. After the month - end, the capital price remained loose, and the 1 - year AAA certificate of deposit stayed at around 1.67%. Credit interest rates declined slightly, with the 3 - year and 5 - year AAA - secondary capital bonds falling by 1.7bps and 1.9bps respectively compared with last week, reaching 1.92% and 2.05% [1][9] Weakening Impact of the Stock and Commodity Markets on the Bond Market - The impact of the stock and commodity markets on the bond market has gradually weakened. The 10 - day moving correlation coefficient between the daily interest rate change of the 30 - year active bond and the increase of the Shanghai Composite Index dropped from around 0.8 in late July to around 0.15 currently. On one hand, it is due to the change in bond institutional positions; on the other hand, the relative cost - effectiveness of bonds compared with stocks has gradually increased. Since the end of July, the commodity price index has continued to decline, and the Nanhua Industrial Product Price Index on September 4th has cumulatively dropped by 6.3% compared with the high on July 25th [2][10] Factors Protecting the Bond Market - The loose capital and banks' under - allocation are the main protections for the bond market. The fundamentals are still under pressure, the demand is not strong, and the financing demand is insufficient, so the loose capital situation remains unchanged. The future asset supply will further decline, and the net financing of government bonds in the next 4 months may significantly decrease compared with the same period last year. For banks, the deposit growth rate is rising while the credit growth rate is slowing down, so banks need to increase bond allocation to make up for the gap, and they may have a high willingness to increase allocation [3][10] Reasons for the Oscillatory and Progressive Recovery of the Bond Market - Other markets still impact the bond market. Although the seesaw effect between stocks and bonds has weakened, non - banks still hold a relatively high position in long - term bonds, and a significant rise in the stock market may lead to institutional selling and short - term bond market fluctuations. Seasonal factors may restrict the downward speed of interest rates. September is often a period of interest rate adjustment, and October is an oscillatory period. The new regulations on public fund redemption fees may reduce institutional willingness to invest in bond funds, and the redemption behavior may bring short - term adjustment pressure to the market [4][14][17]

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the coal mining industry [5] Core Viewpoints - The report emphasizes that the performance pressure on coal companies has ended, and a recovery is expected, not just a rebound [3][8] - It anticipates that coal prices may peak by the end of the year, with a potential for upward movement due to supply constraints [3][8] Summary by Sections Market Overview - The CITIC Coal Index was at 3,459.14 points, up 0.10%, outperforming the CSI 300 Index by 0.91 percentage points [2][76] - Recent coal price trends show a slight recovery, with the price of Q5500 coal in major production areas experiencing increases [14][39] Financial Analysis of Coal Companies - The report identifies top performers in terms of cash flow and low debt levels among coal companies, highlighting companies like China Shenhua and Jinko Coal [3] - The report notes that the profitability of coal companies is likely to improve following the price lows observed in June [3] Key Areas of Analysis - **Thermal Coal**: The report indicates a rebound in thermal coal prices due to downstream demand for replenishment, with prices expected to rise during peak seasons [14][39] - **Coking Coal**: The report notes that coking coal prices are under pressure due to weak downstream demand, but there is still support for prices as the peak season approaches [41][55] - **Coke**: The report highlights that coke prices have seen a decline due to reduced demand from steel mills, with the first round of price reductions initiated by steel manufacturers [57][76] Investment Strategy - The report recommends stocks with high earnings elasticity, such as Lu'an Mining and Jinko Coal, and emphasizes the importance of monitoring domestic supply and import conditions [11][41] - It also suggests focusing on companies with strong performance records, such as Shaanxi Coal and Electric Power, and Huai Bei Mining [11][41]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for renewable energy operators due to the accelerated recovery of renewable energy subsidies, which is expected to alleviate cash flow pressures for green electricity operators [3][6][7]. Core Viewpoints - The "Document 136" promotes the full market entry of renewable energy, intensifying competition in the sector. The accelerated recovery of national renewable energy subsidies is anticipated to significantly ease cash flow pressures for green electricity operators, benefiting their recovery and long-term development [3][12]. - Recent data shows that several renewable energy operators have received substantial renewable energy subsidy funds, with notable increases in funding compared to the previous year. For instance, Jin Kai New Energy received CNY 1.214 billion, a 341.67% increase year-on-year, while Solar Energy received CNY 2.319 billion, a 232.23% increase [13][13][13]. Summary by Sections Industry Trends - The report indicates a 0.51% increase in the CITIC Power and Utilities Index, outperforming the CSI 300 Index by 1.33 percentage points during the week of September 1-5, 2025 [4][67]. - The coal price has dropped to CNY 687 per ton, which may impact the thermal power sector positively [15]. Renewable Energy - The price of silicon materials has risen to CNY 48 per kg, while the price of mainstream silicon wafers remains stable at CNY 1.42 per piece. This trend is expected to enhance the profitability of photovoltaic projects in the long run [50]. Hydropower - As of September 5, 2025, the inflow and outflow of the Three Gorges Reservoir have increased by 31.71% and 69.81% year-on-year, respectively, indicating a robust performance in hydropower generation [38]. Carbon Market - The national carbon market saw a 4.50% decrease in trading prices, with a total trading volume of 2.1243 million tons and a total transaction value of CNY 144 million during the week [60][64]. Key Stocks - The report highlights several key stocks with "Buy" ratings, including Zhejiang Energy, Anhui Energy, and Huaneng International, with projected earnings per share (EPS) and price-to-earnings (PE) ratios indicating potential growth [7].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for several key companies in the textile and apparel industry, including Anta Sports, Li Ning, and Xtep International, with respective 2025 PE ratios of 18x, 19x, and 12x [11][40]. Core Insights - Lululemon's FY2025Q2 revenue grew by 7% year-on-year to $2.5 billion, which was below the company's expectations, primarily due to weak performance in the U.S. market [1][16]. - The report highlights a continued recovery in the consumer environment for apparel, with a focus on the long-term growth potential of the sports footwear and apparel segment [3][24]. - The report emphasizes the importance of product differentiation and brand strength in the jewelry sector, predicting that companies with clear product differentiation will outperform the industry in 2025 [4][24]. Summary by Sections Lululemon's Performance - Lululemon's Q2 revenue was $2.5 billion, with a 7% year-on-year increase, and a 6% increase on a currency-neutral basis. The Americas segment saw a 1% increase, while international revenue grew by 22% [1][16]. - The gross profit increased by 5% to $1.5 billion, but the gross margin decreased by 1.1 percentage points to 58.5% [1][16]. - The company adjusted its FY2025 revenue growth forecast to 2%-4%, with a potential 4%-6% growth on a comparable 52-week basis [1][16]. Regional Analysis - In the U.S., Q2 revenue was flat, with a 1% increase in the Americas segment. The company noted that consumer response to new product colors was below expectations, indicating a potential issue with product lifecycle [20]. - In China, Q2 revenue grew by 24%, driven by the opening of five new stores and various brand-building activities. The company expects a 20%-25% revenue growth in FY2025 for the Chinese market [20][21]. Apparel and Footwear Sector - The report indicates that the sports footwear segment is expected to outperform the overall apparel market, with a healthy inventory turnover ratio of 4-5 [3][24]. - Key recommendations include Anta Sports, Li Ning, and Xtep International, which are expected to show strong performance due to their operational capabilities and market positioning [27][40]. Jewelry Sector - The report notes that the jewelry market is facing weak demand, with gold jewelry consumption down 27% and 24% in Q1 and Q2, respectively. Companies with strong product and brand capabilities are expected to perform better [39][24]. Manufacturing Sector - The textile manufacturing sector is experiencing changes due to new tariff policies, which may impact profit expectations for 2025-2026. Companies with integrated and international supply chains are expected to gain market share [8][25]. - Recommendations include Shenzhou International and Huayi Group, which are seen as having strong performance and competitive advantages [25][40].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a rating of "Buy" for companies such as Beixin Building Materials and China Jushi, while recommending "Overweight" for Weixing New Materials [9]. Core Views - The construction materials sector experienced a decline of 3.04% from September 1 to September 5, 2025, with cement down 2.22% and fiberglass down 7.46%, while glass manufacturing saw a slight increase of 2.13 [12]. - Shenzhen's recent real estate policy adjustments are expected to stimulate demand, particularly in the consumer building materials segment, benefiting companies like Beixin Building Materials and Weixing New Materials [2][9]. - The report highlights a potential recovery in the fiberglass market, with prices stabilizing after a price war, and an increase in demand from the wind power sector [2][7]. Summary by Sections Cement Industry Tracking - As of September 5, 2025, the national cement price index was 336.2 RMB/ton, a decrease of 0.43% week-on-week, with cement output at 2.5775 million tons, up 0.68% [17]. - The cement market is in a weak recovery phase, with demand expected to remain limited due to funding and progress constraints in infrastructure projects [17]. Glass Industry Tracking - The average price of float glass was 1192.99 RMB/ton, with a slight increase of 0.28% week-on-week, while inventory levels rose by 500,000 boxes [6]. - Market sentiment remains cautious, with demand primarily driven by essential replenishment rather than speculative buying [6]. Fiberglass Industry Tracking - The price of non-alkali fiberglass remained stable, with some manufacturers planning price increases due to seasonal demand and cost pressures [7]. - The demand for electronic fiberglass is recovering slowly, while high-end products continue to see strong sales [7]. Consumer Building Materials Tracking - The consumer building materials segment is benefiting from improved second-hand housing transactions and consumption stimulus policies, with companies like Beixin Building Materials and Weixing New Materials recommended for investment [2][9]. - The report notes a weak recovery in demand for consumer building materials, with fluctuations in raw material prices impacting market sentiment [8]. Carbon Fiber Industry Tracking - The carbon fiber market remains stable, with production levels at 1854 tons and an operating rate of 61.59% [8]. - The industry continues to face challenges with profitability, as many companies are still operating at a loss [8].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the real estate industry [4][6]. Core Insights - Shenzhen has followed Beijing and Shanghai in relaxing purchase restrictions, with a more significant impact expected compared to the latter cities [11]. - The overall performance of the real estate sector has lagged behind the broader market, with the Shenwan Real Estate Index down 1.5% this week, ranking 24th among 31 sectors [12]. - New home sales in 30 cities totaled 1.488 million square meters this week, reflecting a 17.9% decrease month-on-month and an 11.2% decrease year-on-year [23]. - The report emphasizes the importance of policy-driven changes in the real estate market, suggesting that the current policy environment is more robust than in previous cycles [4]. Summary by Sections Real Estate Development - Shenzhen's new policy has narrowed the scope of purchase restrictions, with only specific areas remaining under strict limits [11]. - The report anticipates that the marginal effects of Shenzhen's new policy will be more pronounced than those in Beijing and Shanghai [11]. Market Review - The Shenwan Real Estate Index has decreased by 1.5%, underperforming the CSI 300 Index by 0.67 percentage points [12]. - A total of 49 stocks in the real estate sector increased in value this week, while 62 stocks declined [12]. New Home and Second-Hand Home Transactions - New home sales in first-tier cities increased by 4.4% month-on-month, while second-tier cities saw a 23.3% decrease [23]. - Second-hand home transactions in 14 sample cities totaled 1.719 million square meters, with a year-on-year increase of 13.0% [34]. Credit Bonds - Eight credit bonds were issued by real estate companies this week, totaling 8.69 billion yuan, with a net financing amount of -1.24 billion yuan [42]. - The majority of bonds issued were rated AAA, indicating a strong credit quality among issuers [42]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on real estate stocks due to the expected policy-driven recovery and the early-cycle nature of the real estate market [4]. - Recommended companies include major players in both A-shares and H-shares, as well as local state-owned enterprises and property management firms [4].

Supply - The average operating rate of 247 sample blast furnaces nationwide decreased by 1.7 percentage points to 81.8%, which is 4.8 and 1.2 percentage points higher than the same period in 2024 and 2019, respectively[2] - The average operating rate of coking enterprises fell by 1.8 percentage points to 68.4%, which is 0.9 percentage points higher than 2024 but 4.1 percentage points lower than 2019[2] - The average operating rate of cement grinding fell by 2.3 percentage points to 40.3%, marking a new low compared to the same period in recent years, and is 10.1 and 27.4 percentage points lower than 2024 and 2019, respectively[2] Demand - New home sales in 30 major cities increased by 11.5% month-on-month, with a year-on-year increase of 2.7%[5] - The average sales area of second-hand homes in 18 cities decreased by 4.5% month-on-month but saw a year-on-year increase of 20.3%[5] - The apparent demand for steel increased by 0.1% to approximately 842.8 million tons, but the absolute value is the lowest in recent years, with a year-on-year decline of 1.6%[4] Prices - The South China Index decreased by 0.2% month-on-month, with a year-on-year increase narrowing to 4.0%[7] - Brent crude oil prices increased by 1.9% month-on-month, with a year-on-year decline narrowing to 12.4%[7] - Pork prices fell by 1.1% to approximately 19.9 yuan/kg, with a year-on-year decline expanding to 27.3%[7] Inventory - Coastal power plants' coal inventory decreased by 1.5% month-on-month, but the absolute value remains high, with a year-on-year decline of 1.2%[8] - Steel and electrolytic aluminum inventories increased by 4.7% and 6.0% month-on-month, respectively, with both being at near historical lows[8] - Asphalt inventory decreased by 7.0% month-on-month, with a year-on-year decline narrowing to 25.3%[8] Liquidity - The central bank net withdrew 10,086 billion yuan through OMO in the past half month, indicating a tightening of liquidity[10] - The issuance of local special bonds reached 4,449.9 billion yuan, with a cumulative issuance of 32,819.7 billion yuan since the beginning of the year, achieving 74.6% of the annual target[11]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for key stocks in the basic chemical sector, including Dongyangguang, Jingtai Holdings, Daoshi Technology, and Satellite Chemical [3]. Core Insights - The basic chemical sector is experiencing a configuration opportunity, with the index dropping 59.5% from a peak of 9565.18 points to a low of 3876.11 points between September 2021 and February 2024. However, the sector has shown resilience with a 14.3% increase in the basic chemical index from July 11 to September 5, 2024 [1]. - Solid-state battery materials are highlighted as a significant investment opportunity, with a projected order total exceeding 30 billion yuan and a year-on-year growth of 70-80% in the first half of 2025 [1]. - AI4S is accelerating its penetration in the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, with a notable increase in innovative drug license-out transactions reaching 41 deals worth 36.929 billion USD in Q1 2025 [2]. Summary by Sections Basic Chemical Sector - The sector has faced a significant downturn but is now showing signs of recovery, with a notable increase in the index and ongoing projects [1]. - The solid-state battery industry is receiving policy support, leading to increased demand for related materials [1]. AI4S and Material Investment Opportunities - AI is transforming drug development processes, significantly speeding up research and reducing costs [2]. - The report identifies key players in AI4S and related materials, emphasizing their potential for growth and innovation [2]. Key Stocks - Dongyangguang: Buy rating with projected EPS growth from 0.13 in 2024 to 0.74 in 2026 [3]. - Jingtai Holdings: Buy rating with a projected EPS improvement from -0.38 in 2024 to 0.02 in 2027 [3]. - Daoshi Technology: Buy rating with EPS expected to rise from 0.20 in 2024 to 1.45 in 2027 [3]. - Satellite Chemical: Buy rating with EPS projected to grow from 1.80 in 2024 to 3.27 in 2027 [3].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company [6] Core Views - The company's performance has been impacted by business adjustments leading to short-term fluctuations, with a focus on optimizing operational rhythm and product layout to strengthen long-term development foundations [2] - The domestic market is under short-term pressure, while the overseas market continues to grow, with expectations for the new AQ-400 product to ramp up production [1][3] Financial Performance Summary - In H1 2025, the company achieved revenue of 260 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 26.36%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of -40.77 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 820.03% [1] - The revenue breakdown for H1 2025 includes: - Endoscope equipment: Revenue of 240 million yuan (down 29.63%), gross margin of 63.75% (down 8.34 percentage points) - Endoscopic diagnostic consumables: Revenue of 9.66 million yuan (up 40.10%), gross margin of 22.74% (down 23.18 percentage points) - Endoscope maintenance services: Revenue of 9.33 million yuan (up 122.29%), gross margin of 70.76% (up 3.02 percentage points) [2] - The overall gross margin for H1 2025 was 62.39%, down 9.07 percentage points, primarily due to the increased proportion of lower-margin overseas business and changes in domestic product structure [2] Market Strategy and Product Development - The company is actively expanding its presence in both domestic and overseas markets, with successful product approvals and marketing efforts driving growth in overseas revenue [3] - The company has launched multiple new products, including the AQ-400 flagship model and various endoscopic devices, enhancing its product matrix for long-term growth [4] - The company has conducted 16 grassroots training activities across 11 provinces and 13 cities in China to promote endoscopic technology and expand its market reach [3] Earnings Forecast and Investment Recommendations - Revenue projections for 2025-2027 are estimated at 830 million, 995 million, and 1.197 billion yuan, representing year-on-year growth rates of 10.7%, 19.9%, and 20.4% respectively [4] - Net profit attributable to shareholders is forecasted to be 47 million, 94 million, and 156 million yuan for the same period, with year-on-year growth rates of 125.8%, 98.1%, and 66.1% respectively [4] - The corresponding price-to-earnings ratios are projected to be 136X, 68X, and 41X [4]

- Model Name: Timing Radar Hexagon; Model Construction Idea: The model is based on a multi-dimensional timing framework, considering factors such as liquidity, economic conditions, valuation, capital flow, technical indicators, and crowding. It generates a comprehensive timing score between [-1,1][1][6] - Model Construction Process: The model selects 21 indicators from six dimensions (liquidity, economic conditions, valuation, capital flow, technical indicators, and crowding) and categorizes them into four major categories: "Valuation Cost-Effectiveness," "Macro Fundamentals," "Capital & Trend," and "Crowding & Reversal." The comprehensive timing score is then generated within the range of [-1,1][1][6] - Model Evaluation: The model provides a neutral view with a current comprehensive score of -0.06, indicating a balanced market outlook[1][6] Model Backtest Results - Timing Radar Hexagon, Comprehensive Score: -0.06[1][6] - Liquidity Score: 0.25[1][8] - Economic Conditions Score: 0.25[1][8] - Valuation Score: -0.29[1][8] - Capital Flow Score: 0.00[2][8] - Technical Indicators Score: -0.50[2][8] - Crowding Score: 0.00[2][8] Factor Construction and Process 1. Factor Name: Monetary Direction Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor aims to determine the direction of current monetary policy by calculating the average change in central bank policy rates and short-term market rates over the past 90 days. If the factor is greater than 0, it indicates a loose monetary policy; if less than 0, it indicates a tight monetary policy[12] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Monetary Direction Factor} = \text{Average Change in Policy Rates and Market Rates over 90 Days} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the monetary direction factor is greater than 0, indicating a bullish signal with a score of 1[12] 2. Factor Name: Monetary Strength Factor; Factor Construction Idea: Based on the "interest rate corridor" concept, this factor measures the deviation of short-term market rates from policy rates. If the factor is less than -1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a loose environment for the next 120 trading days; if greater than 1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a tight environment[15] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Monetary Strength Factor} = \frac{\text{DR007}}{\text{7-Year Reverse Repo Rate}} - 1 $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the monetary strength factor indicates a bearish signal with a score of -1[16] 3. Factor Name: Credit Direction Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor measures the tightness of credit transmission from commercial banks to the real economy using long-term loan indicators. If the factor shows an upward trend compared to three months ago, it indicates a bullish signal; otherwise, it indicates a bearish signal[18] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Credit Direction Factor} = \text{Year-over-Year Change in Long-Term Loans over the Past 12 Months} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the credit direction factor shows an upward trend, indicating a bullish signal with a score of 1[18] 4. Factor Name: Credit Strength Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor captures whether credit indicators significantly exceed or fall short of expectations. If the factor is greater than 1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a significantly above-expectation environment for the next 60 trading days; if less than -1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a significantly below-expectation environment[21] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Credit Strength Factor} = \frac{\text{New RMB Loans - Median Expectation}}{\text{Standard Deviation of Expectation}} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the credit strength factor shows no significant signal with a score of 0[21] 5. Factor Name: Growth Direction Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor is based on PMI data and measures the year-over-year change in the 12-month average PMI. If the factor shows an upward trend compared to three months ago, it indicates a bullish signal; otherwise, it indicates a bearish signal[22] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Growth Direction Factor} = \text{Year-over-Year Change in 12-Month Average PMI} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the growth direction factor shows an upward trend, indicating a bullish signal with a score of 1[22] 6. Factor Name: Growth Strength Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor captures whether economic growth indicators significantly exceed or fall short of expectations. If the factor is greater than 1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a significantly above-expectation environment for the next 60 trading days; if less than -1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a significantly below-expectation environment[26] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Growth Strength Factor} = \frac{\text{PMI - Median Expectation}}{\text{Standard Deviation of Expectation}} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the growth strength factor indicates a bearish signal with a score of -1[26] 7. Factor Name: Inflation Direction Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor measures the current inflation level and its impact on monetary policy. If the factor shows a downward trend compared to three months ago, it indicates a bullish signal; otherwise, it indicates a bearish signal[27] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Inflation Direction Factor} = 0.5 \times \text{Smoothed CPI Year-over-Year} + 0.5 \times \text{Original PPI Year-over-Year} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the inflation direction factor shows a downward trend, indicating a bullish signal with a score of 1[27] 8. Factor Name: Inflation Strength Factor; Factor Construction Idea: This factor captures whether inflation indicators significantly exceed or fall short of expectations. If the factor is less than -1.5, it indicates a significantly below-expectation environment for the next 60 trading days; if greater than 1.5 standard deviations, it indicates a significantly above-expectation environment[30] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Inflation Strength Factor} = \frac{\text{CPI and PPI Expectation Difference}}{\text{Standard Deviation of Expectation}} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the inflation strength factor shows no significant signal with a score of 0[30] 9. Factor Name: Shiller ERP; Factor Construction Idea: This factor calculates the Shiller PE based on the average inflation-adjusted earnings over the past six years and then calculates the Shiller ERP. The score is the z-score of the past six years[31] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Shiller ERP} = \frac{1}{\text{Shiller PE}} - \text{10-Year Treasury Yield} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the Shiller ERP shows an upward trend, with the score rising to 0.18[31] 10. Factor Name: PB; Factor Construction Idea: This factor calculates the z-score of the past six years for the PB ratio, standardized to ±1 after capping at 1.5 standard deviations[35] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{PB Score} = \text{z-score of PB over the past 6 years} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the PB score rises to -0.39[35] 11. Factor Name: AIAE; Factor Construction Idea: This factor measures the aggregate investor allocation to equities, reflecting overall market risk appetite. The score is the z-score of the past six years[37] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{AIAE} = \frac{\text{Total Market Cap of CSI All Share}}{\text{Total Market Cap of CSI All Share + Total Debt}} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the AIAE score decreases to -0.66[37] 12. Factor Name: Margin Trading Increment; Factor Construction Idea: This factor measures the market sentiment and leverage by calculating the average increment of margin trading over the past 120 days compared to the past 240 days. If the short-term increment is greater than the long-term increment, it indicates a bullish signal; otherwise, it indicates a bearish signal[40] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Margin Trading Increment} = \text{Average Increment of Margin Trading over 120 Days - Average Increment over 240 Days} $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the margin trading increment indicates a bearish signal with a score of -1[40] 13. Factor Name: Trading Volume Trend; Factor Construction Idea: This factor measures the market trading activity by calculating the moving average distance of logarithmic trading volume. If the maximum distance of short-term moving averages is greater than the long-term moving averages, it indicates a bullish signal; otherwise, it indicates a bearish signal[43] - Factor Construction Process: $$ \text{Trading Volume Trend} = \frac{\text{ma120}}{\text{ma240}} - 1 $$ - Factor Evaluation: This week, the trading volume trend indicates a bearish signal